DeeVid AI Reviews 

Too expensive

I used DeeVid for short AI video. Some times did not understand the prompt and I am forced to create two or more times just for one short video and it is on my cost.

I have had some of the same problems as other users in terms of the AI not getting a shot right in the first or even third time...but I think it's unrealistic to expect perfection...especially when any experience with human animators will teach you that this is the same process but ultimately much easier and much cheaper. Making animated videos is just not easy for AI or humans

Really good content and reasonable policy. The AI discussion tool is fair minded and excellent. Highly recommend.

Quite happy with the results ...
Important constraint is that the prompt is not always properluy interpreted. After extending the prompt (which should not be needed in some cases), you have to pay again.
Might be an option to provide a none dowloaded low quality preview.

Some results are genuinely stunning and unbelievably realistic - modern photographic realism often generated from just one sketch drawing (I find the more reference images you use, the more it compunds mistakes). My best results are exactly what I'm after. Despite very detailed prompts though, there are almost always unwanted mistakes, and I spend literally hours using 'erase' on Microsoft photos and Paint 3D - sometimes freehand - (I'm quite a good forger), to try to correct! It's great at cleaning up and colourising old photos but it changes faces too much to recognise the people wanted (some 5-second videos didn't do that, but others did) Other results can be laughably awful and are only kept to do that - laugh. Unfortunately, that's where most of my credits go! It reminds me of using 35mm film - a 36-shot film would often only give me one or two really good photographs and the rest might be okay-ish or useless. Anyway, I give it four stars for the fantastic results that I can really use. It did originally give me the feeling that the mistakes were deliberate to use up credits - but I'm just a bitter, old cynic!

This AI system is exceptionally useful and highly user-friendly, making it well worth recommending to friends. However, my sole reservation lies in its security and data privacy.

Generally high quality renditions of prompts. Better than most.

One of a kind, I would say!

My experience has largely been positive, but so far I've only used it for limited requests. The results are often excellent. When I am dissatisfied, it is because the results are mistaken or incorrect interpretations of the prompt, as when (for example) a vehicle in the photograph moves backwards, yet the people walk forward.

The images produced are great. They are accurate to what I describe.

I am satisfied with the results when I create images based on reference drawings. There can be up to 5 of them with some models, which is sufficient. As for the creation of images, some are very nice. The animation is usually weaker, or rather the original objects are simplified and distorted, especially faces. What works with very little success is editing images, where the AI ​​often does not understand the description. Moreover, editing is very expensive in terms of credits, so it is generally not worth editing a generated image. I have been using Deevid for several months and it looks like I will be for some time.

The concept behind this is great but the pricing should be based on success. The Ai often agrees that it makes errors, but the consumer still pays. I read other reviews and the review summary, it is spot on. The credit system is a failure, much too expensive when you include paying for Ai errors. Sure we humans will always make them, but a learning curve needs to be provided for. As a hobbyist a monthly subscription would suit me better. Once my credits run out so will I. Hope you can make this more Human friendly. Regards Tony P. Mt Barker, Australia

I like that the software allows you to input prompts without always saying that a harmless word violates its safety policies. On a different app I wanted it to create a scene with people swimming in a lake and I couldn't even say "swim suit". However I do think that this Ai software makes a lot of mistakes that require multiple edits, and the edits are costly.

Very bad, don't waste your money, the videos don't turn out well and they charge for each edit.

Having used it since 2025, I found that it is quite good at creating images and videos. However, it consumes a lot of credits.

Since there are no discount events, it is a significant burden to use. Therefore, it is difficult to use it frequently. If it were a bit cheaper, I think I could use it without any burden.

good and reasonable results, ai is sometime confused with community guide line, and image that it has its self produced, when re-imported can be flagged as a community violation, thought it makes a good image, it is case sensitive, and can ignore a word, then produce a first class image that has nothing to do with the prompt

I work in audiovisuals and I'm just starting to work with AI. And the experience has been really good because it's very easy to use and the different sections fit well with what I wanted to achieve.

first time trying it worked pretty good got what I asked for