RU2691268C1 - Device for automated assessment of feasibility of a combat mission of a group of missile systems - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: rocket equipment.SUBSTANCE: invention relates to an automated assessment of feasibility of a combat mission of a grouping of missile systems. Device comprises a unit for input, control and recording of input data, an input data memory unit, a source data memory unit, a unit for inputting, updating and recording initial data, a memory unit for evaluation results, a unit for outputting evaluation results, according to one unit for determining the composition of the remaining combat resource of the grouping at each of the four stages of the warring parties process, wherein each of the last four blocks consists of identical in structure blocks: unit for generating initial data, unit for simulating failures of elements of missile systems and effect of enemy equipment on combat resource of grouping, which is built on the basis of analytical model of dynamics of changing composition of combat resource of grouping, and unit of combat resource of grouping at stage to equivalent number of striking elements of missile combat equipment, except for unit for determining composition of surviving combat resource of grouping at fourth stage, where such unit is absent.EFFECT: high accuracy of the result of assessing the combat mission of a group of missile systems.1 cl, 1 dwg

Description

The invention relates to specialized computing devices. It can be used in assessing and analyzing the effectiveness of existing and prospective missile systems (RK), the preparation of proposals for their improvement.

The invention is a device containing elements (blocks) and connections between them, which are in functional and structural unity and placed in a confined space with the ability to perform in a single package.

One of the indicators of the level of realizability by the RK grouping of the combat mission assigned to it is the number of destructive elements of the combat equipment of the missiles (hereinafter referred to as elements of the battlefield) delivered to enemy targets [Volkov EB, Norenko A.Yu. Rocket standoff. M .: SIP RIA, 2001. - 168 p.]. This indicator is adopted in the present invention to assess the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan grouping. The combat mission of the grouping is considered to be realizable if the number of elements of the BO delivered to the targets of destruction is not less than the specified number. For a given number of BO elements, as a rule, their minimum required number is taken to ensure the destruction of enemy targets.

The change (decrease) in the number of BO elements from their initial composition is a consequence of the losses of the combat life of the grouping from the effects of the enemy’s funds on the components of the Republic of Kazakhstan and failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan during combat use. By the combat resource of the group of RK we will mean launchers (launchers), missiles, stages of breeding (CP) and elements of the BO, which the group has.

For an automated assessment of the feasibility of a combat task assigned to the RK grouping, it is necessary to create a priori means of determining the number of elements of the battlefield, delivered by the grouping to enemy targets during combat operations, and comparing them with the required number.

Known technical solutions that can be used in devices for assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping. These include approaches based on:

- simulation modeling of the warring parties confrontation processes;

- representation of the attainability coefficient of objects of destruction by BO elements in the form of a product of technical characteristics indicators of the Republic of Kazakhstan

- an analytical representation of the dynamics of changes in the composition of the elements of BO groups.

Simulation [White A.F. Formalization of information confrontation processes in military automation equipment // Strategic Stability, №4, 2011, p. 2-7] requires the creation of complex models that describe all stages of the process of confrontation of the warring parties. Practical use of such models is associated with a large amount of computational operations and the need to use high-performance hardware and software to reduce the time spent on obtaining assessment results. In addition, simulation modeling is unsuitable for solving synthesis problems due to the lack of a parametric connection of the model for changing the resource of a RK group with the parameters of the operational and technical characteristics of the RK elements.

In [Volkov EB, Norenko A.Yu. Rocket standoff. M .: SIP RIA, 2001. - 168 p.] Proposed an approach to the assessment, which is based on the representation of the number of BO elements that have reached the goals, in the form of a work:

- количество элементов БО, достигших целей;Where

- the number of BO elements that have reached the goals;

- исходное количество элементов БО, находящихся на боевом дежурстве в группировке РК;

- the initial number of elements of the BO, on duty in the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

- коэффициент готовности РК к пуску ракет;

- the coefficient of readiness of the Republic of Kazakhstan to launch rockets;

- вероятность доведения до ПУ приказа на пуск ракет;

- the probability of bringing to order the launch of missiles;

- надежность РК;

- reliability of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

- живучесть РК.

- vitality of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

This approach ensures the rapid receipt of assessment results. But at the same time it has the following disadvantages:

- lack of consideration of specific technical characteristics of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the intensity of the impact of the enemy in relation to the various stages of confrontation of the warring parties;

- the inability to display the dynamics of changes in the combat life of the group during its combat use.

The first of these drawbacks reduces the reliability of the results obtained assessing the feasibility of a combat mission under various scenarios of combat operations. The second drawback does not allow identifying the periods of time for the use of a grouping with the most critical losses of a combat resource.

The closest analogue to the approach used in the claimed invention, is the approach described in [Vasilenko V.V., Kazakov G.V., Kotyashev N.N. Evaluation of the functional stability of a group of intercontinental ballistic missiles // Astronautics and Rocket Science, 2011, no. 1 (62), p. 139-147]. It is based on an analytical view of the dynamics of changes in the number of elements of a BO grouping due to their losses from the effects of the enemy. The number of surviving (combat-ready) elements of the CP at an arbitrary time of application of the group has been proposed to be determined from the following expression:

- произвольный момент времени применения группировки;Where

- arbitrary time of application of the group;

- количества боеготовых элементов БО в момент времени

;

- the number of combat-ready elements of the BO at time

;

- функция распределения вероятностей воздействия средств противника на элементы РК в момент времени

.

- probability distribution function of the impact of the enemy’s funds on the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan at the time point

.

Expression (2) allows one to obtain the number of elements of the BO remaining with a given step in the interval of application of the grouping under arbitrary laws of the probability distribution of the impact on the grouping.

The disadvantages of this approach include:

- lack of accounting for failures of elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the dynamics of the combat use of the grouping;

- lack of consideration of the specifics of loss of elements of BO at various stages of the application of the grouping;

- taking into account the combat life of the group throughout the course of combat operations only in the elements of the battlefield, and not in those components of the missile systems, which are directly affected by the enemy’s weapons and the failure of which results in losses of the elements of the battlefield.

In addition, the calculated dependence (2) adequately describes the change in the composition of elements of a BO only when the defeat or failure of one unit of a combat resource (PU, rocket, stage of dilution, element BO) corresponds to a decrease in the combat readings of the BO of a group by one unit. This condition is performed only for groups equipped with rockets with monoblock warheads (MS).

For missiles whose combat equipment contains more than one BO element, the loss of PU, missile or dilution steps, if they are defeated or refused, leads to the loss of several BO elements. In this case, the ratio between the lost resource and the number of lost elements of the BO varies depending on the stage and time of the loss of the combat resource. For example, the loss of one launcher before the launch of a rocket, as well as the loss of one rocket in flight at the active launch site (AUV), lead to a reduction in the combat readiness elements of the grouping BO by a number corresponding to the number of BO elements on the rocket. In the active breeding area (AUR) of the elements of the BW, there is a more complex ratio between the number of lost combat resources (breeding steps) and the number of elements of the BW lost at the same time. This is due to the fact that the loss of elements of BO on AUR correspond to their number, not separated from the step of breeding by the time of the occurrence of the event of its defeat or failure. Depending on the time of occurrence of the specified event, the number of lost BO elements may vary from one to the entire number of BO elements on a rocket or be completely absent.

Thus, the aforementioned disadvantages of the considered approach reduce the reliability of the results of assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan grouping with missiles containing multi-element combat equipment.

The problem, which is solved in the present invention, and its technical result is to ensure acceptable efficiency and improve the accuracy of the result of assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan group with any type of combat equipment (single-block, with the sequential separation of elements of the BO, with a parallel separation of the elements of the BO) Bo on a rocket.

The above problem is solved, and the required technical result is achieved due to:

- implementation in the proposed device of an analytical model of the dynamics of changes in the composition of the combat resource of the group at all stages of its combat use, taking into account the impact on the grouping of enemy vehicles and failures of the missile complexes in the process of bringing an order to launch missiles, launch missiles and elements combat equipment;

- additions of the model for changing the combat life of a grouping with a stage for the breeding of combat equipment, at which the specific features of the ratio of the number of lost stages of breeding of combat equipment and the number of BO elements lost during this are manifested;

- accounting of the combat life of the group at each stage of its combat use in those components of the missile systems (launchers, missiles, breeding stages, striking elements of the combat equipment) that are directly affected by the enemy’s assets and failures result in losses of the elements of the BO grouping.

The approach used to account for combat resources at the stages of combat use and the introduction of an additional stage adequately reflect the actual losses of the combat resource of the grouping and preclude obtaining an erroneous result of assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping with any type of combat equipment and different numbers of BO elements on the rocket.

The basis of the technical solutions that are applied in the inventive device for the automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping, contains the approach (method) proposed in the invention [Patent RU No. 2647135 of 03/14/2018, Byul. №8]. In presenting this approach, the specified invention does not consider the direction of its technical implementation in the form of a device.

The main theoretical background of the approach, which is implemented in the proposed device, are as follows.

The losses of the combat resource of the grouping are determined in stages. For each stage, a time interval is taken which has its own specificity of losses of the combat life of the group. To this end, the whole process of confrontation of the warring parties is divided into 4 stages:

) обнаружения пусков ракет противника или от времени принятия решения на пуск ракет группировки РК (в зависимости от того, что наступит раньше) до старта ракет группировки (

). Результатом этапа является количество стартовавших ракет.- Stage 1: from the moment (

) detection of enemy missile launches or from the time a decision is made to launch missiles of the RK grouping (depending on what happens earlier) before the group’s missiles launch (

). The result of the stage is the number of launched missiles.

) старта ракет до завершения активного участка выведения (

). Завершением АУВ является отделение от ракеты ступени разведения (для ракет с последовательным отделением элементов БО) или отделение элементов БО (для моноблочных ракет и ракет с параллельным отделением элементов БО). Результатом этапа является количество ракет, последние ступени выведения которых штатно завершили отделение ступеней разведения или элементов БО.- Stage 2: from the moment (

) the launch of missiles before the completion of the active launch site (

). The completion of the AUV is the separation from the rocket of the stage of dilution (for missiles with sequential separation of elements of the BO) or the separation of elements of the BO (for monoblock rockets and missiles with parallel separation of the elements of the BO) The result of the stage is the number of missiles, the last stages of the elimination of which nominally completed the separation of the stages of breeding or elements of BO.

) до завершения (

) активного участка разведения. Завершением АУР является отделение от ступени разведения всех элементов БО. Результатом третьего этапа является количество элементов БО, штатно отделившихся от ступеней разведения. Для моноблочных ракет и ракет с параллельным отделением элементов БО третий этап отсутствует.- Stage 3: from the beginning (

) to completion (

) active breeding site. The completion of the AUR is the separation from the stage of dilution of all elements of the BO. The result of the third stage is the number of elements BO, nominally separated from the steps of breeding. For monoblock rockets and rockets with parallel separation of elements of a BO, the third stage is absent.

) до момента доставки элементов БО к объектам поражения (

). Результатом этапа является количество элементов БО, доставленных до объектов поражения.- Stage 4: since the separation of the elements of the BO from the last stage of the rocket (

) until the delivery of elements of the BO to the objects of destruction (

). The result of the stage is the number of BO elements delivered to the targets.

At each stage, determine the number of surviving combat resources of the group after the impact on him of the enemy and the failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The calculated dependence characterizing the number of surviving combat resources of the group at an arbitrary point in time at the stage of its use has the following form:

- количество боевого ресурса группировки, сохранившегося к моменту времени

;Where

- the number of combat resources of the group, preserved by the time

;

- количество боевого ресурса группировки на начало этапа;

- the number of combat resources of the group at the beginning of the stage;

- живучесть элементов РК, задействованных на этапе;

- the survivability of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan involved in the stage;

,

- время начала и окончания этапа соответственно;

,

- the start and end time of the stage, respectively;

- вероятность воздействия противника на элементы РК в момент времени

;

- the probability of the impact of the enemy on the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan at the time

;

- надежность элементов РК, задействованных на этапе;

- reliability of the elements of the RK involved in the stage;

- вероятность отказов элементов РК в момент времени

.

- probability of failure of elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan at the time

.

On the basis of formula (3), the dependencies of changes in the surviving combat resource of the group at each stage of its application are formed:

- количество сохранившегося боевого ресурса группировки в функции времени на этапах 1, 2, 3, 4 соответственно;Where

- the number of surviving combat resources of the group as a function of time at stages 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively;

- исходное количество ПУ (ракет) группировки РК, находящихся на боевом дежурстве;

- the initial number of launchers (missiles) of the RK group on alert;

- живучесть боевого ресурса группировки (ПУ, ракеты, ступени разведения, элемента БО);

- survivability of the combat life of the grouping (PU, missiles, cultivation levels, BO element);

- вероятность воздействия противника на ПУ, ракеты, СР и элементы БО соответственно в момент времени

;

- the probability of the impact of the enemy on PU, missiles, SR and elements of BO, respectively, at the time

;

- надежность ПУ, ракеты, СР и элемента БО соответственно;

- reliability of PU, missiles, CP and BO element, respectively;

- вероятность отказов РК, ракеты, СР и элемента БО соответственно в момент времени

;

- the probability of failures of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the missile, the CP and the BO element, respectively, at the time point

;

- количество боевого ресурса группировки на начало этапов 2, 3, 4 соответственно.

- the number of combat resources of the group at the beginning of stages 2, 3, 4, respectively.

The formula dependence (4) describes the time variation of the number of surviving combat resources of the group at the first stage of its use. Expressions (5), (6) and (7) provide a solution to a similar problem for the second, third and fourth stages, respectively.

The number of combat resource groups at the beginning of the 2nd and 3rd stages (rockets and breeding stages) corresponds to the number of surviving resources at the time of completion of the preceding stages (launchers and missiles). The number of combat resources at the beginning of the last stage (elements of the BO) is determined from the following expression:

- количество боеготовых ракет на момент окончания АУВ;Where

- the number of combat missiles at the time of the end of AUV;

- количество элементов БО на одной ракете;

- the number of BO elements on one rocket;

- количество элементов БО группировки, потерянных на АУР (только для РК, оснащенных ракетами с последовательным отделением элементов БО).

- the number of elements of the BO grouping lost at the AUR (only for the Republic of Kazakhstan, equipped with missiles with sequential separation of elements of the BO).

) составляют элементы БО, не отделившиеся к моменту потери СР. Поэтому значение

может быть определено из сопоставления времен потерь ступеней разведения с временами отделения от них элементов БО. Для этого необходимо задать законы распределения моментов потерь ступеней разведения и отделения элементов БО от каждой СР на протяжении АУР. Например, принимают допущение, что потери СР и моменты отделения элементов БО от каждой СР распределены равномерно на протяжении АУР. С учетом такого допущения порядок определения количества элементов БО, потерянных на АУР, представляют следующим образом.The loss of elements of the BO on AUR (

) are the elements of BO, not separated by the time of loss of SR. Therefore meaning

can be determined by comparing the times of loss of the steps of breeding with the times of separation of the elements of BO from them. For this, it is necessary to specify the distribution laws of the moments of loss of the dilution steps and the separation of the elements of the CP from each CP throughout the AUR. For example, it is assumed that the CP loss and the moments of separation of the BO elements from each CP are distributed evenly throughout the AUR. Given this assumption, the procedure for determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR is as follows.

Step 1. From the results obtained when calculating by formulas (4) ... (6), determine:

- the number of CP lost at AUR:

- the duration of the breeding of the elements of BO:

- the time interval between the losses of the SR:

- the time interval between the offices of BO elements:

Step 2. Set the initial values of the parameters for the calculation:

- количество потерянных элементов БО;

- the number of lost items BO;

- номер потерянной СР,

;

- number of lost CP,

;

- номер элемента БО, отделяемого от СР,

.

- the number of the BO element separated from the CP,

.

Step 3. Determine the ratio of the moments of time of loss of the lth CP and separation of the pth BO element from it by monitoring the condition:

Step 4. If condition (13) is satisfied, then the loss of the lth CP will occur before the separation of the pth elements of the BO. As a result, together with the CP, the elements of the BO that are not separated from it will be lost. Their number is determined from the expression:

Adjust the total number of lost BO elements in the grouping to the number of BO elements lost together with the lth breeding step:

Increase the number of lost CP:

, выполняют переход к шагу 3. В противном случае выполняют переход к шагу 6.If a

, proceed to step 3. Otherwise, proceed to step 6.

Step 5. If condition (13) is not satisfied, then increase the number of the separated element of the BO:

, выполняют переход к шагу 3. В противном случае выполняют переход к шагу 6.If a

, proceed to step 3. Otherwise, proceed to step 6.

Step 6. Completion of calculations.

, полученное по формуле (15), характеризует количество элементов БО, потерянных на АУР. Используя это значение, по формуле (8) находят исходное количество боеготовых элементов БО на начало последнего этапа боевого применения группировки.Total value

, obtained by the formula (15), characterizes the number of BO elements lost in the AUR. Using this value, using the formula (8), find the initial number of combat-ready elements of the BO at the beginning of the last stage of the combat use of the group.

, полученному по формуле (7) на момент подлета элементов БО к объектам поражения (

), делают заключение о реализуемости боевой задачи группировки РК. При выполнении условия: By value

, obtained by the formula (7) at the time of arrival of elements of the BO to the objects of destruction (

), make a conclusion about the feasibility of the combat mission of the group of the RK. When the condition is met:

The combat mission of the RK grouping is considered realizable.

- количество боеготовых элементов БО, доставленных группировкой РК до объектов поражения противника;Here

- the number of combat-ready elements of the BO, delivered by the Republic of Kazakhstan to the targets of the enemy;

- минимальное количество элементов БО, необходимое для выполнения боевой задачи группировки РК.

- the minimum number of elements of the BO required to perform the combat mission of the group of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

The probability distribution functions of the adversary's impact on the RK elements and the failures of the RK elements used in formulas (4) ... (7) can be given by any theoretical distribution law (uniform, normal, exponential, etc.) or experimental frequency ranges followed by their approximation.

Having a set of data characterizing the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the type and parameters of the probability distribution functions of the enemy's actions and failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan, using the dependencies (4) ... (7) and the above order of determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR, you can get the number of surviving combat resources grouping at any time of its application. The values of the amount of the resource, obtained with a given discreteness in time, make it possible to form the trajectory of changes in the combat resource of the RK grouping during the confrontation of the warring parties. The volume of the combat resource of the grouping in the form of elements of the battlefield, preserved by the time of their delivery to the targets of destruction, characterizes the realizability of the combat mission of the grouping. An analysis of the resource loss dynamics of the grouping throughout the fighting will reveal the bottlenecks, their causes and suggest ways to improve the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan in order to increase the level of realizability of its combat mission.

Formula dependencies (4) ... (7) allow us to obtain an assessment of the feasibility of the combat task of grouping only the same type of RoK. This is due to the fact that in expressions (4) ... (7) the parameters of efficiency, reliability, survivability are used, having different values for different types of RC. The assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the entire group of the Republic of Kazakhstan is found by summing the results of assessments for several groups of the same type at synchronized points in time during the period of confrontation between the parties. In this case, each private group includes missile systems of the same type.

The essence of the invention is illustrated in the drawing (Fig. 1). Here is a block diagram of an automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan grouping.

The device contains:

- block 1 of input, control and recording of input data;

- block 2 memory input data;

- block 3 of the original data memory;

- block 4 of input, updating and recording of initial data;

- block 9 memory evaluation results;

- block 10 of the output of the evaluation results;

- four blocks (5, 6, 7, 8) of determining the composition of the surviving combat life of the group (one block for each stage of the process of confrontation of the warring parties).

Each of the last four blocks contains:

- block of formation of initial data (5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1);

- a unit for simulating failures of elements of rocket complexes and the effect of enemy funds on the combat life of the group (5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2), which is based on an analytical model of the dynamics of changes in the composition of the combat life of the group;

- a unit for converting a combat resource of a group at a stage to an equivalent number of damaging elements of missile combat equipment (5.3, 6.3, 7.3), with the exception of block 8 for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of a group at the fourth stage, where such a block is missing.

The links between the blocks are organized as follows.

The output of block 1 of input, control and recording of input data is connected to the input of block 2 of the memory of input data. The output of block 4 of input, updating and recording of initial data is connected to the input of block 3 of memory of initial data. The output of block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results is connected to the input of the block 10 of the output of the evaluation results. The outputs of block 2 of the input data memory and block 3 of the source data memory are connected respectively with the first and second inputs of the 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1 blocks of forming the initial data. The first outputs of blocks 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 of forming initial data for the first, second and third stages, as well as the output of the similar block 8.1 for the fourth stage, are connected to the inputs of blocks 5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2 of simulating failures of elements of missile complexes and the effect of the enemy’s weapons on combat resource grouping for the first, second, third and fourth stages, respectively. The second outputs of blocks 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 of forming initial data for the first, second and third stages are connected to the first inputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3, 7.3 of converting the combat life of the grouping into the equivalent number of elements of the BO in the first, second and third stages, respectively. The first outputs of blocks 5.2, 6.2 of simulating failures of elements of rocket complexes and the effects of enemy funds on the combat resource of the group for the first and second stages, as well as the output of the similar block 7.2 for the third stage are connected to the second inputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3, 7.3 of converting the combat resource of the group into the equivalent him the number of elements of BO in the first, second and third stages, respectively. The second outputs of blocks 5.2, 6.2 of simulating failures of elements of rocket complexes and the effects of enemy funds on the combat resource of the group for the first and second stages are connected to the second inputs of similar blocks 6.2, 7.2 at the second and third stages, respectively. The first outputs of blocks 6.3, 7.3 of converting a combat resource of a grouping into the equivalent number of BO elements in the second and third stages are connected to the second input of a block 8.2 for modeling failures of elements of missile systems and the effect of enemy assets on the combat resource of the group for the fourth stage. The output of block 5.3 converting a combat resource of a grouping into an equivalent number of elements of a CP at the first stage and the second outputs of such blocks (6.3, 7.3) at the second and third stages, as well as the output of a block 8.2 of modeling failures of elements of missile systems and the impact of the enemy’s assets on a combat resource of the group at the fourth stage, connected to the input of block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results.

The device contains elements (blocks), characterized at the functional level. Their implementation involves the use of, in particular, programmable (customizable) multifunctional tools.

The device for the automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan works as follows.

Previously in block 3 of the original data memory using the block 4 of input, updating and recording of the initial data the information is recorded:

системах управления войсками и оружием:-

troop and weapon control systems:

время обнаружения ракет противника от момента их старта;

the time of the detection of enemy missiles from the moment of their launch;

длительность принятия решения на ответные действия;

the duration of the decision to respond;

время доведения приказа на пуск ракет до пусковых установок;

time to bring an order to launch missiles to launchers;

группировках РК:-

RK groupings:

количество однотипных группировок РК;

the number of similar groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

тип РК каждой группировки;

RK type of each group;

количество ПУ в каждой группировке;

the number of PU in each grouping;

ракетном комплексе и его элементах в каждой группировке:-

rocket complex and its elements in each grouping:

оперативные характеристики элементов РК:

operational characteristics of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan:

длительность предстартовой подготовки ракет к пуску;

the duration of the pre-launch preparation of missiles for launch;

длительность участка выведения боевого оснащения или боевой ступени разведения элементов БО;

the duration of the site of removal of combat equipment or combat stage of breeding elements of BO;

длительность участка разведения элементов БО;

the length of the plot breeding elements BO;

надежность РК и его элементов;

reliability of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its elements;

живучесть РК и его элементов;

the vitality of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its elements;

тип головной части ракеты (моноблочная, с последовательным отделением элементов БО, с параллельным отделением элементов БО);

type of rocket head (monoblock, with sequential separation of BO elements, with parallel separation of BO elements);

количество элементов БО на ракете;

the number of BO elements on the rocket;

виды функций распределения вероятностей отказов элементов РК на каждом этапе боевого применения группировки;

types of probability distribution functions of failures of the RK elements at each stage of the combat use of the grouping;

значения параметров функций распределения вероятностей отказов элементов РК для каждого этапа;

the values of the parameters of the probability distribution functions of failures of the RK elements for each stage;

возможном воздействия противника на составные части группировки РК на каждом этапе ее применения:-

possible impact of the enemy on the component parts of the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan at each stage of its application:

виды функций распределения вероятностей воздействия противника на составные части группировки РК на каждом этапе ее применения;

types of probability distribution functions of the impact of the enemy on the components of the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan at each stage of its application;

значения параметров функций распределения вероятностей воздействия противника.

the values of the parameters of the probability distribution functions of the enemy's impact.

This information using the block 4 input, updating and recording the source data can be updated and updated during the operation of the proposed device.

The initial data contains all the necessary information to assess the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping, and for some parameters (for example, the types of the probability distribution functions for the failure of elements of the RK and the effect of enemy funds on the grouping), the information is even redundant. Such redundancy is due to the fact that for each stage of grouping there are several possible types of distribution functions, from which to solve the problem it is necessary to select and specify only one type.

Immediately before carrying out an assessment of the feasibility of the formed variant of the combat mission of the RK grouping, the values of the input data parameters for this variant are entered into the device. The input data should determine the composition of the studied group, the content of the assessment results that are displayed when the problem is completed, and clarify the types of functions used to distribute the probability of failure of the RC elements and the impact of the enemy at each stage of the group application. This is the minimum required amount of input data. In addition, to solve research problems by setting the parameters of the input data, any parameters from the source data can be quickly adjusted. Each input value of the input data parameter is monitored for compliance with its allowable values or ranges of variation, as well as for mutual correspondence with the values of other parameters from the input and input data. All of the above functions are implemented by block 1 input, control and recording of input data. If the result of the control of the entered parameters is positive, they are recorded in block 2 of the input data memory.

After the recording of the input data is completed, blocks 5, 6, 7, 8 are determined sequentially to determine the composition of the surviving combat life of the group in the first, second, third and fourth stages, respectively. The order of functioning of these units is very similar. We describe the functioning of unit 5 for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of the grouping at the first stage, and then we indicate the features of the work of the rest of the indicated units (6, 7, 8).

Exhaustive information for determining the surviving combat life of the grouping at the first stage is prepared by the unit 5.1 of generating initial data based on the available information in block 2 of the input data memory and block 3 of the source data memory. The composition of the initial data is formed primarily from the information of the block 2 memory input data. Information that is not in block 2 of the input data memory, but is necessary for solving the problem, is extracted from block 3 of the original data memory. The number of launchers of the group on duty is taken as the initial value of the combat resource located by the grouping. This and other information given in expression (4) is prepared by the initial data generation unit 5.1 and transmitted to the 5.2 block of modeling the failures of elements of the missile complexes and the effect of the enemy’s assets on the combat life of the group.

The basis of block 5.2 of modeling the failures of elements of rocket complexes and the effect of enemy weapons on the combat resource of the group is computational procedures that implement the expression (4). The output information of block 5.2 is the number of surviving combat resources of the grouping at a certain point in time t of the first stage of the process of confrontation between the parties. The combat life of the group at the beginning of the stage is represented by launchers, and at the end of the stage, by successfully launched missiles. The time moments of the stage are formed on the basis of a given discreteness, with which it is necessary to obtain output information. The number of successfully launched rockets at the end of the first stage is transferred from block 5.2 to the same block 6.2 of the next stage as the initial value of the number of the combat resource of the group at this (second) stage. In addition, the number of surviving launchers at each point in time of the stage and the number of successfully launched missiles at the end of the stage are transferred from block 5.2 to block 5.3 to convert the combat life of the group into the equivalent amount of BO elements. Such a transformation at this stage is auxiliary. It is necessary so that the final results of solving the problem can be represented as the dynamics of changes in the number of both the initial combat resource of the group at the stage (PU or missile) and its equivalent number of BO elements at synchronized times.

The transformation of the combat resource of the grouping from its original form into the equivalent number of elements of the BO at each time point of the t stage is carried out in block 5.3 based on the implementation of the following expression:

- количество боеготовых элементов БО в группировке на момент времени t;Where

- the number of combat-ready elements of the BO in the group at the moment of time t ;

- количество сохранившегося боевого ресурса группировки в исходном виде на момент времени t;

- the number of surviving combat life of the group in its original form at time t ;

- штатное количество элементов БО на одной ракете.

- the regular number of BO elements on one rocket.

The output of block 5.3 (the number of surviving combat resources of the grouping in its original form and in the equivalent number of elements of the battlefield with reference to time t ) is transmitted to the block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results for their recording and storage.

Upon completion of recording the output information of block 5.3 in block 9, the determination of the number of surviving combat resources of the group begins at the next (second) stage of confrontation between the parties. This problem is solved in block 6.

The functioning of the elements of blocks 6, 7, 8 has the following differences from the order of operation of the elements of block 5 described above.

In the initial data formation units (6.1, 7.1, 8.1), the function of preparing the quantity of the combat resource of the group at the beginning of the stage is excluded. This information comes in blocks 6.2, 7.2 of modeling the failures of elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the impact of enemy funds on the combat resource of a group of similar blocks 5.2, 6.2 of the preceding stages. In block 8.2, such information (the number of combat-ready elements of a battlefield at the beginning of the last stage) comes from block 6.3 or from block 7.3, depending on the type of warheads of the grouping missiles. For single-block MS or MS with parallel separation of the BO elements, the initial value of the number of BO elements for the fourth stage is formed by the block 6.3 of the second stage. For warheads with sequential separation of elements of the BO, the number of BO elements at the beginning of the fourth stage is formed by the block 7.3 of the third stage.

Functionally, blocks 6.2, 7.2, 8.2 differ from block 5.2 in the implementation of other formula dependencies in them, namely (5), (6) and (7), respectively. Block 7.2 as well as block 8.2, differs from blocks 5.2 and 6.2 by the presence of only one output. But the connections of these outputs are different. From the output of block 7.2, information is transmitted about the surviving combat stages of the grouping as a function of time to the input of block 7.3 for the subsequent determination of the number of combat-ready elements of the BM in the third stage. And the output information of block 8.2 as the number of combat-ready elements of the BO as a function of time at the final stage is transmitted for recording in block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results.

Block 6.3 is functionally implemented as described above block 5.3. However, unlike block 5.3, it has an additional output, by which the final value of the number of surviving BO elements at the second stage is transmitted to the input of block 8.2 of the last stage when the missiles are equipped with a group of monoblock warheads and warheads with parallel separation of BO elements.

Block 7.3 for interaction with other blocks is similar to block 6.3. It has the same additional output for transmitting information in block 8.2 on the number of combat-ready elements of the BO at the end of the third stage. This information in block 8.2 is used as the initial value of the quantity of the combat resource of the grouping at the fourth stage for rockets with sequential separation of elements of the BO. Functionally, block 7.3 is significantly different from blocks 5.3 and 6.3. To determine the number of surviving (combat-ready) elements of the BO at any point in time of the third stage, it implements the above procedure for determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR and the formula dependence (8).

Structurally, block 8 differs from similar blocks (5, 6, 7) in the absence of an element that converts a combat resource of a grouping into an equivalent number of BO elements, since throughout the last stage of the combat resource group is taken into account in the elements of the BO.

After the last of the four blocks 5, 6, 7, 8 is completed and their results are recorded in block 9, the conformity of the number of RK groups of the same type and the number of groups assessed to the assessment is monitored. If not all specified groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan are still assessed, then using the technology described above, an assessment of the feasibility of the next group's combat mission is performed until the entire specified number of them is exhausted.

After completing the solution of the problem for the last one-type grouping, the results of the assessment of the feasibility of the combat task of the group of the Republic of Kazakhstan are carried out. This function performs the block 10 output of the evaluation results. The volume and form of the output information, as well as the information output device, are specified by the user in the input data to solve the problem. According to the user's task, it is possible to display all intermediate values or only the final result, the displayed information should be presented in graphical and / or tabular form, the information should be displayed on the screen or a printing device.

The approach of the invention [Patent RU № 2647135 from 03/14/2018, Byul. No. 8], implemented in the proposed device, differs from the known approaches to the assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan group with the following features:

- an additional stage was introduced into the model for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of the grouping - the stage of diluting combat equipment, which has specific features for determining the number of lost elements of the CP;

- at each stage of the confrontation of the warring parties, the combat resource of the group is taken into account in those elements of the missile complex in which it is lost at these stages.

The presence of the listed signs provides the most adequate reflection in the device of the actual loss of the combat life of the group. The consequence of this is to increase the reliability of the result of assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping with any type of combat equipment, different numbers of BO elements on the rocket and under all possible scenarios of combat operations.

Thus, thanks to the introduced blocks and connections specified in the claims, the required technical result is achieved, which consists in providing acceptable operational and accuracy characteristics of the automated assessment device of the combat mission of the RK group with any type and quantity of combat equipment on the rocket.

Claims (1)

A device for automated assessment of the realizability of a combat mission for grouping missile systems, containing an input block, control and recording of input data, an input data memory block, an initial data memory block, an input data block, updates and initial data records, an evaluation result memory block, an evaluation result output block, one unit for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of the grouping at each of the four stages of the process of confrontation of the warring parties, each of the last four units consists of the same on the structure of the blocks: the initial data generation unit, the unit for modeling the failures of the missile system elements and the impact of the enemy’s assets on the combat resource of the group, which is based on the analytical model of the dynamics of changes in the composition of the combat resource of the group, and the transformation unit of the combat resource of the group in the equivalent amount of damage elements of combat equipment (BO) missiles, with the exception of the block determining the composition of the surviving combat life of the group at the fourth stage, which By the way such a block is absent, and communications between the blocks are organized as follows: the output of the input block, control and recording of input data is connected to the input of the input data memory block, the output of the input block, updating and recording of the initial data is connected to the input of the initial data memory block, the output of the memory block evaluation results connected to the input of the evaluation output unit, the outputs of the input data memory and the initial data memory are connected respectively to the first and second inputs of the initial data generation units, the first outputs blocks of formation of initial data for the first, second and third stages, as well as the output of the same block for the fourth stage are connected to the inputs of blocks for modeling failures of elements of rocket complexes and the impact of enemy funds on the combat resource of the group for the first, second, third and fourth stages, respectively, second outputs blocks of formation of initial data for the first, second and third stages are connected to the first inputs of blocks for the conversion of the combat resource of the group into equivalent quantities about the elements of the BO in the first, second and third stages, respectively, the first outputs of the blocks of modeling failures of elements of missile complexes and the impact of the enemy’s assets on the combat resource of the group for the first and second stages, as well as the output of the similar block for the third stage are connected to the second inputs of the conversion blocks of the combat resource groupings in the equivalent number of BO elements in the first, second and third stages, respectively, the second outputs of the blocks for modeling failures of elements of missile systems and airborne For the first and second stages, the enemy’s funds for the combat resource of the grouping are connected to the second inputs of similar blocks in the second and third stages, respectively; the first outputs of the group’s combat resource conversion blocks to the equivalent number of BO elements in the second and third stages are connected to the second input of the failure simulation block elements of rocket complexes and the impact of the enemy’s assets on the combat resource of the group for the fourth stage, the output of the unit for converting the combat resource of the group into the equivalent number of BO elements in the first stage and the second outputs of such blocks in the second and third stages, as well as the output of the simulation module for failures of elements of missile complexes and the impact of the enemy’s assets on the combat resource of the group in the fourth stage are connected to the input of the evaluation results memory block, modeling of failures of elements of rocket complexes and the impact of enemy funds on the combat resource of the fourth stage of the process of confrontation of the warring parties is designed to assess the feasibility the combat task of grouping missile complexes by calculating the number of combat-ready elements of a battlefield brought by a group of missile complexes to enemy targets.

Images