RU190530U1 - THE DEVICE OF AUTOMATED EVALUATION OF THE REALIZABILITY OF THE BATTLE TASK OF GROUPING ROCKET COMPLEXES - Google Patents

Abstract

The device for the automated assessment of the realizability of the combat task of grouping missile systems relates to specialized devices of computer technology. It can be used in assessing and analyzing the effectiveness of existing and prospective missile systems, preparing proposals for their improvement. The technical result of the invention is the expansion of the functional capabilities of the device and the provision on this basis of the most adequate reflection in the device actually occurring losses of the combat life of the group during combat operations. The technical result is achieved by taking into account in the device the multiple diverse types of the enemy’s impact on the combat resource of the group at each stage of its application.

Description

The utility model relates to specialized computing devices. It can be used in assessing and analyzing the effectiveness of existing and advanced missile systems (RK), the preparation of proposals for their improvement.

A utility model is a device containing elements (blocks) and connections between them that are in a functional and constructive unity and placed in a confined space with the ability to perform in a single package.

One of the indicators of the level of realizability by the RK grouping of the combat mission assigned to it is the number of destructive elements of the combat equipment of the missiles (hereinafter referred to as elements of the battlefield) delivered to enemy targets [Volkov EB, Norenko A.Yu. Rocket standoff. M .: SIP RIA, 2001. - 168 p.]. This indicator is adopted in the present utility model for assessing the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping. The combat mission of the grouping is considered to be realizable if the number of elements of the BO delivered to the targets of destruction is not less than the specified number. For a given number of BO elements, as a rule, their minimum required number is taken to ensure the destruction of enemy targets.

The change (decrease) in the number of BO elements from their initial composition is a consequence of the losses of the combat life of the grouping from the effects of the enemy’s funds on the components of the Republic of Kazakhstan and failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan during combat use. By a combat resource of a group of RK, we will mean launchers (launchers), missiles, steps of dilution (CP) and elements of BO, which the group has.

To assess the feasibility of a combat task assigned to the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan, funds are needed to ensure a priori determination of the number of elements of the battlefield, delivered by the grouping to enemy targets during combat operations, and comparing them with the required number.

A device for automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping is known [Application for the invention No. 201119582 dated 05.28.2018], which is taken as the prototype of the present utility model. This device is based on the method described in the invention [Patent RU No. 2647135 dated March 14, 2018, Bull. №8].

The main provisions of the method, which is implemented in the device prototype, are as follows.

The losses of the combat resource of the grouping are determined in stages. For each stage, a time interval is taken which has its own specificity of losses of the combat life of the group. To this end, the whole process of confrontation of the warring parties is divided into 4 stages:

- Stage 1: from the moment (t ₀ ) of the detection of launches of the enemy’s missiles or from the time of the decision to launch the missiles of the Republic of Kazakhstan (whichever comes first) before the launch of the group’s missiles (t _c ). The result of the stage is the number of launched missiles.

- Stage 2: from the moment of the launch of the missiles (t _c ) to the completion of the active launch site (t _ay ). The completion of the active elimination section (AUV) is the separation of the dilution stage from the rocket (for missiles with sequential separation of the BO elements) or separation of the BO elements (for monoblock rockets and rockets with parallel separation of the BO elements). The result of the stage is the number of missiles, the last stages of the elimination of which nominally completed the separation of the stages of breeding or elements of BO.

- Stage 3: from the beginning (t _ay ) to completion (t _auras ) of the active breeding area (AUR). The completion of the AUR is the separation from the stage of dilution of all elements of the BO. The result of the third stage is the number of elements BO, nominally separated from the steps of breeding. For monoblock rockets and rockets with parallel separation of elements of a BO, the third stage is absent.

- Stage 4: from the moment of separation of the elements of the BO from the last stage of the rocket (t _out ) until the delivery of the elements of the BO to the targets (t _dbo ). The result of the stage is the number of BO elements delivered to the targets.

At each stage, determine the number of surviving combat resource groups after exposure to enemy funds and failures of elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The calculated dependence characterizing the number of surviving combat resources of the group at an arbitrary point in time at the stage of its use has the following form:

where n (t) is the quantity of the combat resource of the group that survived to the time t;

n _nr - the number of combat resource groups at the beginning of the stage;

R _W - the survivability of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan involved in the stage;

t _n , t _to - start and end time of the stage, respectively;

P _in (t _н ≤t≤t _к ) - the probability of the impact of the enemy on the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan at the moment of time t;

Р _рк - reliability of the RK elements involved at the stage;

Р _from (t _н ≤t≤t _к ) - probability of failures of the RK elements at the moment of time t.

On the basis of formula (1), the dependencies of changes in the surviving combat resource of the group at each stage of its application are formed:

where n _c (t), n _aou (t), n _auras (t), n _dbo (t) is the number of surviving combat resources of the group as a function of time at stages 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively;

n _DB - the initial number of launchers (missiles) of the RK group on alert;

K _g - RK readiness ratio for launching missiles;

R _zhpu , P _zhr , P _zsr , P _zhbo - survivability of the combat resource of the grouping (PU, missiles, breeding stages, BO element);

P _b1 (t ₀ ≤t≤t _c ), P _b2 (t _c <t≤t _ayv ), P _b3 (t _ayv <t≤t _auras ), P _b4 (t _out <t≤t _dbo ) - probability of impact the enemy on PU, missiles, CP and elements of BO, respectively, at time t;

R _bu - the probability of bringing to PU an order for launching missiles;

P _pu , P _p , P _cf , P _bo - reliability of PU, missiles, CP and BO element, respectively;

P _ot1 (t ₀ <t≤t _c ), P _ot2 (t _with <t≤t _ayv ), P _ot3 (t _ayv <t≤t _auras ), P _ot4 (t _out <t≤t _dbo ) - probability of failures RK, missiles, CP and BO element, respectively, at time t;

n _c (t _c ), n _ayv (t _ayv ), n _out (t _out ) - the number of combat resources of the group at the beginning of stages 2, 3, 4, respectively.

The formula dependence (2) describes the time variation of the number of surviving combat resources of the group at the first stage of its use. Expressions (3), (4) and (5) provide a solution to a similar problem for the second, third, and fourth stages, respectively.

The number of combat resources of the group at the beginning of the 2nd and 3rd stages (rockets and breeding stages) corresponds to the number of the remaining resource at the time of completion of the preceding stages. The number of combat resources at the beginning of the last stage (elements of the BO) is determined from the following expression:

where n _ay (t _ay ) - the number of combat-ready missiles at the time of the end of the AUV;

n _bo - the number of BO elements on one rocket;

Δn _bo - the number of BO elements of the grouping lost at the AUR (only for the Republic of Kazakhstan, equipped with missiles with a consistent separation of the BO elements).

Losses of BO elements on AUR (Δn _bo ) make up BO elements that are not separated by the time of loss of the SR. Therefore, the value of Δn _bo is determined by comparing the times of loss of the steps of breeding with the times of separation of the elements of BO from them. For this, it is necessary to specify the laws of the distribution of losses of the dilution steps and the separation of the elements of the BO from the CP. For example, accept the assumption that the loss of CP and the moments of separation of elements of BO are evenly distributed throughout the AUR. Given this assumption, the procedure for determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR is as follows.

Step 1. From the results obtained when calculating by formulas (2) ... (4), determine:

- the number of CPs lost on AUR:

- the duration of the breeding of the elements of BO:

- time interval between CP loss:

- the time interval between the offices of BO elements:

Step 2. Set the initial values of the parameters for the calculation:

Δn _bo = 0 - the number of lost items BO;

- номер потерянной CP,

- number of lost CP,

p = 1 is the number of the BO element separated from CP, p = {1, ..., n _bo }.

CP и отделения от нее р-го элемента БО посредством контроля выполнения условия:Step 3. Determine the ratio of the moments of loss

CP and separation from it of the pth element of the BO by monitoring the fulfillment of the condition:

CP происходит до отделения р-го элементов БО. В результате этого совместно со ступенью разведения будут потеряны не отделившиеся от нее элементы БО. Их количество определяют из выражения:Step 4. If condition (13) is satisfied, then the loss

CP occurs before the separation of the pth BO elements. As a result of this, together with the step of dilution, elements of BO that are not separated from it will be lost. Their number is determined from the expression:

ступенью разведения:Adjust the total number of lost BO elements of the grouping to the number of BO elements lost together with

breeding stage:

Increase the number of lost CP:

выполняют переход к шагу 3. В противном случае выполняют переход к шагу 6.If a

proceed to step 3. Otherwise, proceed to step 6.

Step 5. If condition (13) is not satisfied, then increase the number of the separated element of the BO:

If p≤n _bo , proceed to step 3. Otherwise, proceed to step 6.

Step 6. Completion of calculations.

The final value Δn _bo , obtained by the formula (13), characterizes the number of BO elements lost in the AUR. Using this value, by the formula (6) find the number of combat-ready elements of the BO at the beginning of the last stage of the combat use of the group.

For the value of n _dbo , obtained by the formula (5) at the time of arrival of elements of the BO to the objects of destruction (t _dbo ), make a conclusion about the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan. When the condition is met:

The combat mission of the RK grouping is considered realizable.

Here, n _dbo (t _dbo ) is the number of combat-ready elements of the battlefield, delivered by the RK grouping to the targets of the enemy;

n _dbo.min is the minimum number of elements of a BW necessary to accomplish the combat mission of the RK grouping.

As follows from expressions (2) ... (5), the model of changing the composition of the combat resource of the group takes into account at each stage of the use of the grouping only one type of enemy impact on the combat resource. At the first stage, such an impact is described by the parameter Р _в1 in the formula (2), at the second, third and fourth stages of the impact are described by the parameters Р _в2 , Р _в3 , Р _в4 in formulas (3), (4), (5), respectively. In a real situation, at each stage there are several possible impacts of different types. For example, nuclear launchers of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, conventional high-precision weapons, reconnaissance and sabotage groups can affect launchers. A missile in flight may be affected by a ground-based, sea-based, and space-based missile defense system. A similar situation is typical for other types of combat resources.

Thus, the disadvantage of the described method, implemented in the prototype, and, consequently, of the prototype itself, is the inability to take into account the multiple effects of the enemy on the combat resource of the group at each of its application stages. The consequence of this is the insufficient adequacy of the reflection in the model of the actual loss of the combat life of the group in a number of situations of confrontation between the parties.

The task, which is solved in the proposed utility model, and its technical result is to expand the functional capabilities of the device and ensure, on this basis, the most adequate reflection in the device of the actual loss of the combat life of the group during combat operations.

The task is solved, and the required technical result is achieved by taking into account in the device the multiple, diverse types of enemy impact on the combat resource of the group at each stage of its application.

The basis of the technical solutions, which are applied in the claimed device for automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat task of the RK grouping, is the methodical apparatus proposed in [Kotyashev NN, Krasnoslobodtsev VP, Kunavin VI On a model for assessing the readiness of a group of missiles for use in the context of multiple impacts on it // XXXVII All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference "Problems of the effectiveness and safety of complex technical and information systems." Collection of papers. Part 7. Military Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces named after Peter the Great (branch in the city of Serpukhov, Moscow region), 2018. - 263 p., P. 34-39]. In presenting the methodological apparatus in this work, the directions of its technical realization in the form of a device are not considered.

The paper shows that the calculated dependence characterizing the number of surviving combat resources of the group at an arbitrary time t of each stage of its application, with the number m of types of effects, has the following form:

where n (t) is the quantity of the combat resource of the group that survived to the time t;

n _nr - the number of combat resource groups at the beginning of the stage;

P _ci is the resistance of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan involved in the stage to the effects of the i-th type;

t _n , t _to - start and end time of the stage, respectively;

F _bi (t _n ≤ t ≤ t _k ) - function of the probability of the impact of the i-th type on the elements of the RK at time t.

In addition to the implementation in the inventive device, expressions (17) propose:

- similar to the prototype, the loss of combat resources to determine consistently at the four stages of the conduct of hostilities;

- to take into account the peculiarities of the loss of a combat resource at various stages;

- at each stage of the combat use of the grouping, add the expression (17) to the failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

Taking into account the proposed formula dependencies of determining the number of surviving combat resources, the groups of the RK take the following form:

where n _{with, in} (t), n _{ay, in} (t), n _{auras, in} (t), n _{dbo, in} (t) - the number of surviving combat resources of the group as a function of time at stages 1, 2, 3, 4 accordingly, taking into account the effects of the enemy;

n _c (t), n _ау (t), n _auras (t), n _dbo (t) - the number of surviving combat resources of the group as a function of time at stages 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively, taking into account the enemy’s actions and failures of the RK elements ;

n _DB - the initial number of launchers (missiles) of the RK group on alert;

_Spui P, P _{cpi, ssri} P, P _sboi - combat resistance resource groups (PU, missiles, dilution steps, elements BO respectively) to the effects of i-th type;

F _в1i (t ₀ ≤t≤t _c ), F _в2i (t _c <t≤t _auv ), F _в3i (t _ау <t≤t _auras ), F _в4i (t _out <t≤t _dbo ) - probability functions effects of type i on PU, missiles, CP and elements of BO at time t at stages 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively;

P _pu , P _p , P _cf , P _bo - reliability of PU, missiles, CP and elements of BO, respectively;

F _{from 1} (t ₀ <t≤t _c ), F from ₂ (t _c <t≤t _auv ), F from ₃ (t _auv <t≤t _auras ), F from ₄ (t _out <t≤t _dbo ) - probability functions failures of PU, missiles, CP and elements of BO at time t at stages 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively;

n _c (t _c ), n _ayv (t _ayv ), n _out (t _out ) - the number of combat resources of the group at the beginning of stages 2, 3, 4, respectively.

Formula dependencies (18) - (19) describe the time variation of the number of surviving combat resources of the group at the first stage of its use. Dependence (18) shows the degradation of a combat resource as a result of multiple, diverse types of influences on it by the enemy. Expression (19) finally specifies the number of surviving combat life of the group at the first stage, taking into account possible failures of the elements of the RK involved at this stage. Expressions (20) - (21), (22) - (23), (24) - (25) provide the solution of similar problems in relation to the second, third and fourth stages, respectively.

The probability distribution functions of the adversary's impact on the elements of the RC and the failures of the RC elements used in formulas (18) ... (25) can be given by any theoretical distribution law (uniform, normal, exponential, etc.) or experimental frequency ranges followed by their approximation.

Having a set of data characterizing the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the type and parameters of the probability distribution functions of the enemy's actions and failures of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan, using the dependencies (18) ... (25) and the above order of determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR, you can get the number of surviving combat resources grouping at any time of its application. The values of the amount of the resource, obtained with a given discreteness in time, make it possible to form the trajectory of changes in the combat resource of the RK grouping during the confrontation of the warring parties. The volume of the combat resource of the grouping in the form of elements of the battlefield, preserved by the time of their delivery to the targets of destruction, characterizes the realizability of the combat mission of the grouping. An analysis of the resource loss dynamics of the grouping throughout the fighting will reveal the bottlenecks, their causes and suggest ways to improve the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan in order to increase the level of realizability of its combat mission.

Formula dependencies (18) ... (25) allow us to obtain an estimate of the feasibility of the combat task of grouping only the same type of RoK. This is due to the use in the formulas of the parameters of efficiency, reliability, sustainability, which have different meanings for different types of RC. The assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the entire group of the Republic of Kazakhstan is found by summing the results of assessments for several groups of the same type at synchronized times of combat operations.

The essence of the proposed utility model is illustrated in the drawing (Fig.). Here is a block diagram of an automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the Republic of Kazakhstan grouping.

The device contains:

- block 1 of input, control and recording of input data;

- block 2 memory input data;

- block 3 of the original data memory;

- block 4 of input, updating and recording of initial data;

- block 9 memory evaluation results;

- block 10 of the output of the evaluation results;

- four blocks (5, 6, 7, 8) of determining the composition of the surviving combat life of the group (one block for each stage of the process of confrontation of the warring parties).

The last four blocks (5, 6, 7, 8) are identical in structure and each of them contains the following blocks:

- block of formation of initial data (5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1);

- a unit for modeling the process of several impacts of a different type on the combat resource of the grouping (5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2);

- block of modeling of failures of elements of rocket complexes (5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3);

- a unit for converting a surviving combat resource of a group at a stage into an equivalent number of damaging elements of missile combat equipment (5.4, 6.4, 7.4), with the exception of block 8 for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of a group in the fourth stage, where such a block is missing.

The links between the blocks are organized as follows.

The output of block 1 of input, control and recording of input data is connected to the input of block 2 of the memory of input data. The output of block 4 of input, updating and recording of initial data is connected to the input of block 3 of memory of initial data. The output of block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results is connected to the input of the block 10 of the output of the evaluation results.

The outputs of block 2 of the input data memory and block 3 of the source data memory are connected respectively with the first and second inputs of the 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1 blocks for generating initial data for each of the four stages.

The first outputs of the blocks 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1 of forming the initial data of each stage are connected to the first inputs of blocks 5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2 of the process of modeling several effects of different types on the combat life of the group at the respective stages. The second outputs of blocks 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1 are connected to the first inputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3 of modeling failures of elements of rocket complexes at the corresponding stages. The third outputs of blocks 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 are connected to the first inputs of blocks 5.4, 6.4, 7.4 of converting the combat life of the grouping into the equivalent number of elements of the battlefield at the corresponding stages.

The outputs of blocks 5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2 of simulating the process of several impacts of different types on the combat life of the group at each stage are connected to the second inputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3 of modeling failures of elements of rocket complexes at the respective stages.

The first outputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3 of simulating failures of elements of rocket complexes in the first and second stages, as well as the output of the analogous block 7.3 for the third stage, are connected to the second inputs of blocks 5.4, 6.4, 7.4 of converting the combat life of the group into the equivalent number of BO elements on the first, the second and third stages, respectively. The second outputs of blocks 5.3, 6.3 of modeling the failures of elements of missile complexes in the first and second stages are connected to the second inputs of blocks 6.2, 7.2 of modeling the process of several different types of impacts on the combat life of the group in the second and third stages, respectively.

The output of block 5.4 converting the combat life of the grouping into the equivalent number of elements of the CP at the first stage and the first outputs of similar blocks (6.4, 7.4) at the second and third stages, as well as the output of block 8.3 of modeling failures of elements of rocket complexes at the fourth stage are connected to the input of block 9 memory evaluation results. The second outputs of blocks 6.4, 7.4 of converting a combat resource of a grouping into an equivalent amount of elements of a BO in the second and third stages are connected to the second input of a block 8.2 of simulating a process of several effects of different types on the combat resource of a group in the fourth stage.

The blocks of modeling the enemy's impact on the combat resource of the grouping (5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2) and the blocks for modeling failures of elements of the missile systems (5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3) are created on the basis of analytical models of changes in the composition of the combat life of the group when exposed to it adversary or failure of its elements.

Block 8.3 of modeling the failures of elements of rocket complexes at the fourth stage is made with the possibility of a final assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of grouping rocket complexes. This function of the block is realized by calculating the number of combat-ready elements of the BO delivered by the group to the enemy targets, and comparing the result obtained with the required value.

Blocks 5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2 of simulating the process of several impacts of different types on the combat resource of a group are new elements of the proposed device in comparison with the device prototype. Their additional introduction into the composition of the proposed device provides for expanding its functionality and ensuring, on this basis, the most adequate reflection in the device of the real enemy actions on the elements of the RK grouping at each stage of combat operations.

The device contains elements (blocks), characterized at the functional level. Their implementation involves the use of, in particular, programmable (customizable) multifunctional tools.

The device for the automated assessment of the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping functions as follows.

Previously in block 3 of the original data memory using the block 4 of input, updating and recording of the initial data the information is recorded:

- on troop and weapon control systems:

the time of the detection of enemy missiles from the moment of their launch;

the duration of the decision to respond;

time to bring an order to launch missiles to launchers;

- about the groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan:

the number of similar groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

RK type of each group;

the number of PU in each grouping;

- about the missile system and its elements in each grouping:

operational characteristics of the elements of the Republic of Kazakhstan:

 the duration of the pre-launch preparation of missiles for launch;

 the duration of the site of removal of combat equipment or combat stage of breeding elements of BO;

 the length of the plot breeding elements BO;

 reliability of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its elements;

the resistance of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its elements to the damaging factors of each type of impact on them;

 type of rocket head (monoblock, with sequential separation of BO elements, with parallel separation of BO elements);

the number of BO elements on the rocket;

types of probability distribution functions of failures of the RK elements at each stage of the combat use of the grouping;

the values of the parameters of the probability distribution functions of failures of the RK elements for each stage;

- about the possible impact of the enemy on the component parts of the grouping of the Republic of Kazakhstan at each stage of its application:

the number of types of enemy actions on the component parts of the RK grouping at each stage of its application;

types of enemy actions on the component parts of the RK grouping at each stage of its application;

types of probability distribution functions of the enemy's impact on the constituent parts of the RK grouping at each stage of its application for each type of impact;

the values of the parameters of the probability distribution function of the impact of the enemy for each stage of application of the grouping and each type of impact.

This information using the block 4 input, updating and recording the source data can be updated and updated during the operation of the proposed device.

The initial data contains all the necessary information to assess the feasibility of the combat mission of the RK grouping, and for some parameters (for example, the types of the probability distribution functions for the failure of elements of the RK and the enemy’s impact on the grouping) information is even redundant. Such redundancy is due to the fact that for each stage of grouping there are several possible types of distribution functions, from which to solve a particular variant of the problem it is necessary to select from the existing sets.

Immediately before carrying out an assessment of the feasibility of the formed variant of the combat mission of the RK grouping, the values of the input data parameters for this variant are entered into the device. The input data should determine the composition of the studied group, the content of the assessment results that are displayed when the problem is completed, and clarify the types of functions used to distribute the probability of failure of the RC elements and the impact of the enemy at each stage of the group application. This is the minimum required amount of input data. In addition, to solve research problems by setting the parameters of the input data, any parameters from the source data can be quickly adjusted. Each input value of the input data parameter is monitored for compliance with its allowable values or ranges of variation, as well as for mutual correspondence with the values of other parameters from the input and input data. All of the above functions are implemented by block 1 input, control and recording of input data. If the result of the control of the entered parameters is positive, they are recorded in block 2 of the input data memory.

After the recording of the input data is completed, blocks 5, 6, 7, 8 are determined sequentially to determine the composition of the surviving combat life of the group in the first, second, third and fourth stages, respectively. The order of functioning of these units is very similar. We describe the functioning of unit 5 for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of the grouping at the first stage, and then we indicate the features of the work of the rest of the indicated units (6, 7, 8).

Exhaustive information for determining the surviving combat life of the grouping at the first stage is prepared by the unit 5.1 of generating initial data based on the available information in block 2 of the input data memory and block 3 of the source data memory. The composition of the initial data is formed primarily from the information of the block 2 memory input data. Information that is not in block 2 of the input data memory, but is necessary for solving the problem, is extracted from block 3 of the original data memory. The number of launchers of the group on duty is taken as the initial value of the combat resource located by the grouping. This and other information given in expressions (18) and (19) is prepared by the initial data generation unit 5.1 and transmitted to blocks 5.2, 5.3, 5.4.

The basis of block 5.2 of modeling the process of several impacts of different types on the combat resource of the grouping is computational procedures that implement the expression (18). The output information of block 5.2 is the number of surviving combat resources of the group after the enemy’s impact at certain points in time t of the first stage of confrontation between the parties. The combat life of the group at the beginning of the stage is represented by launchers, and at the end of the stage, by successfully launched missiles. The time moments of the stage are formed on the basis of a given discreteness, with which it is necessary to obtain output information. According to the results of the simulation of the enemy's impact on the combat life of the grouping, the number of surviving launchers (missiles) at each discrete point in time of the first stage is determined.

Information about discrete values of time and the number of surviving PU (missiles) by this time is transferred from block 5.2 to block 5.3 of modeling failures of the RK elements. The basis of block 5.3 consists of computational procedures that implement the expression (19), i.e. this block additionally takes into account the loss of combat resources as a result of failures of its elements. The output information of block 5.3 is the resultant amount of the surviving combat life of the grouping (taking into account the enemy’s actions and failures of the RK elements) at discrete points in time t of the first stage of confrontation between the parties.

The number of successfully launched missiles at the time of the end of the first stage is transferred from block 5.3 to block 6.2 of the next stage as the initial value of the quantity of the combat resource of the group at this (second) stage.

In addition, the number of surviving launchers at each point in time of the first stage and the number of successfully launched missiles at the end of this stage are transferred from block 5.3 to block 5.4 to convert the combat life of the group at the stage into its equivalent number of BO elements. Such a transformation is auxiliary. It is necessary so that the final results of solving the problem can be represented as a change over time of the quantity of both the initial combat resource of the group at the stage (PU or missile) and its equivalent number of BO elements at synchronized points in time.

The conversion of the combat resource of the grouping from the original form to the equivalent number of elements of the BO at each time point of the t stage is carried out in block 5.4 based on the implementation of the following expression:

where n _bo (t) is the number of combat-ready elements of the BO in the group at time t;

n _br (t) - the number of surviving combat life of the group in its original form at time t;

n _bo - the nominal number of BO elements on one rocket.

The output of block 5.4 (the number of surviving combat resources of the grouping in the original form and in the equivalent number of elements of the battlefield with reference to time t) is transmitted to the block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results for their recording and storage.

After the recording of the output information of block 5.4 is completed in block 9, the determination of the number of surviving combat resources of the group begins at the next (second) stage of confrontation between the parties. This problem is solved in block 6.

The functioning of the elements of blocks 6, 7, 8 has the following differences from the order of operation of the elements of block 5 described above.

In the initial data formation units (6.1, 7.1, 8.1), the function of preparing the quantity of the combat resource of the group at the beginning of the stage is excluded. This information comes in blocks 6.2, 7.2 of the process of modeling several effects of different types on the combat life of the group in the second and third stages of blocks 5.3, 6.3 of modeling failures of elements of missile systems at the preceding stages. In block 8.2, such information (the number of combat-ready elements of the BO at the beginning of the last stage) comes from block 6.4 or from block 7.4, depending on the type of warheads (MS) of the grouping missiles. For single-block MS or MS with parallel separation of the BO elements, the initial value of the number of BO elements for the fourth stage is formed by the block 6.4 of the second stage. For MS with a sequential separation of elements of the BO, the number of elements of the BO at the beginning of the fourth stage is formed by the block 7.4 of the third stage.

The functional blocks 6.2, 6.3, 7.2, 7.3, 8.2, 8.3 differ from the blocks 5.2, 5.3 described above by the implementation of other formula dependencies in them, namely (22) ... (27), respectively. In addition, blocks 7.3 and 8.3 differ from blocks 5.3 and 6.3 by the presence of only one output. But the connections of these outputs are different. From the output of block 7.3, information is transmitted about the surviving combat stages of the grouping as a function of time to the input of block 7.4 for the subsequent determination of the number of combat-ready elements of the BM in the third stage. And the output information of block 8.3 as the number of combat-ready elements of the BO as a function of time is transmitted at the final stage for recording in block 9 of the memory of the evaluation results.

Block 6.4 is functionally implemented as described above block 5.4. However, unlike block 5.4, it has an additional output, by which the final value of the number of surviving BO elements at the second stage is transmitted to the input of block 8.2 of the last stage when the missiles are equipped with a group of monoblock warheads and warheads with parallel separation of the BO elements.

Block 7.4 in interaction with other blocks is similar to block 6.4. It has the same additional output for transmitting information in block 8.2 on the number of combat-ready elements of the BO at the end of the third stage. This information in block 8.2 is used as the initial value of the quantity of the combat resource of the grouping at the fourth stage for rockets with sequential separation of elements of the BO. Functionally, block 7.4 differs significantly from blocks 5.4 and 6.4. To determine the number of surviving (combat-ready) elements of the BO at any point in time of the third stage, it implements the formula dependence (6) and the above procedure for determining the number of BO elements lost in the AUR, using formulas (7) ... (15).

Structurally, block 8 differs from similar blocks (5, 6, 7) in the absence of an element that converts a combat resource of a grouping into an equivalent number of BO elements, since throughout the final stage, the combat resource of the group is taken into account in the elements of the BO.

After the last of the four blocks 5, 6, 7, 8 is completed and their results are recorded in block 9, the conformity of the number of RK groups of the same type and the number of groups assessed to the assessment is monitored. If not all specified groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan are still assessed, then using the technology described above, an assessment of the feasibility of the next group's combat mission is performed until the entire specified number of them is exhausted.

After completing the solution of the problem for the last one-type grouping, the results of the assessment of the feasibility of the combat task of the group of the Republic of Kazakhstan are carried out. This function performs the block 10 output of the evaluation results. The volume and form of the output information, as well as the information output device, are specified by the user in the input data to solve the problem. According to the user's task, it is possible to display all intermediate values or only the final result, the displayed information should be presented in graphical and / or tabular form, the information should be displayed on the screen or a printing device.

Thus, thanks to the introduced blocks and connections specified in the formula of the utility model, the required technical result is achieved, which consists in expanding the functional capabilities of the device (taking into account the multiple impact of the enemy on the combat life of the group at each stage of its application) and ensuring the most adequate reflection on this basis in the device actually occurring losses of the combat resource of the group during the conduct of hostilities.

Claims (1)

A device for automated assessment of the realizability of a combat mission for grouping missile systems, containing an input block, control and recording of input data, an input data memory block, an initial data memory block, an input data block, updates and initial data records, an evaluation result memory block, an evaluation result output block, one unit for determining the composition of the surviving combat resource of the grouping at each of the four stages of the process of confrontation of the warring parties, the last four blocks being the same in structure and each It contains the following blocks: a block of forming initial data, a block of modeling of failures of elements of rocket complexes, a block converting a combat resource of a group at a stage to an equivalent number of damaging elements of combat equipment (BO) of rockets, except for a block determining the composition of a surviving combat resource of a group at the fourth stage where the last of the listed blocks is missing, characterized in that the composition of each of the four blocks to determine the composition of the surviving combat resource At the stage, an additional block was added to simulate the process of several impacts of a different type on the combat resource of the grouping, which was created based on an analytical model of the time variation of the composition of the combat resource of the group in the case of a multiple heterogeneous impact on the enemy, while the links between the blocks are organized as follows: , monitoring and recording the input data is connected to the input of the memory block of the input data, the output of the input block, updating and recording the source data is connected to the input of the memory block and initial data, the output of the evaluation results memory block is connected to the input of the evaluation results output block, the outputs of the input data memory block and the initial data memory block are connected respectively to the first and second inputs of initial data generation units for each of the four stages, first outputs of initial data generation units for each stage, they are connected to the first inputs of the simulation blocks of the process of several impacts of different types on the combat resource of the group at the respective stages; the second outputs of the pho blocks initial data are connected to the first inputs of blocks for modeling missile system elements at appropriate stages, the third outputs of initial data formation blocks for the first three stages are connected to the first inputs of the group’s combat life conversion units to the equivalent number of BO elements at the corresponding stages, process modeling blocks several actions of different types on the combat resource of the group at each stage are connected to the second inputs of the simulation blocks of the first outputs of the missile complex elements at the first and second stages, as well as the output of a similar block for the third stage, connected to the second inputs of the group’s combat life conversion units to the equivalent number of BO elements at the first, second and the third stages, respectively, the second outputs of the blocks of modeling failures of elements of rocket complexes in the first and second stages are connected to the second inputs of the blocks the process of several impacts of different types on the combat resource of the grouping at the second and third stages, respectively, the output of the conversion unit of the combat resource of the grouping into the equivalent number of BO elements at the first stage and the first outputs of similar blocks at the second and third stages, as well as the output of the element failure modeling module rocket complexes in the fourth stage are connected to the input of the memory block of the assessment results, the second outputs of the conversion units of the combat life of the group into an equivalent amount elements of the BO in the second and third stages are connected to the second input of the simulation module of the process of several impacts of different types on the combat resource of the group in the fourth stage, while the block modeling of failures of elements of the missile complexes in the fourth stage is designed to assess the feasibility of the combat task of grouping missile complexes by calculating the number combat-ready elements BO, delivered by the group to the targets of the enemy, and comparing the result obtained with the desired value.

Images