[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0980424A2 - Traitement a l'acide nucleique enzymatique de maladies et etats pathologiques associes aux niveaux d'expression de c-raf - Google Patents

Traitement a l'acide nucleique enzymatique de maladies et etats pathologiques associes aux niveaux d'expression de c-raf

Info

Publication number
EP0980424A2
EP0980424A2 EP98920299A EP98920299A EP0980424A2 EP 0980424 A2 EP0980424 A2 EP 0980424A2 EP 98920299 A EP98920299 A EP 98920299A EP 98920299 A EP98920299 A EP 98920299A EP 0980424 A2 EP0980424 A2 EP 0980424A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
nucleic acid
rna
acid catalyst
acid molecule
ribozyme
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP98920299A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Thale Jarvis
Jasenka Matulic-Adamic
Mark Reynolds
Kevin Kisich
Laurent Bellon
Tom Parry
Leonid Beigelman
James A. Mcswiggen
Alexander Karpeisky
Alex Burgin
James Thompson
Christopher T. Workman
Amber Beaudry
David Sweedler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sirna Therapeutics Inc
Original Assignee
Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals Inc filed Critical Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals Inc
Priority to EP03002270A priority Critical patent/EP1321521A1/fr
Publication of EP0980424A2 publication Critical patent/EP0980424A2/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11—DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1135—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • A61P17/06—Antipsoriatics
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P29/00—Non-central analgesic, antipyretic or antiinflammatory agents, e.g. antirheumatic agents; Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAID]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11—DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1137—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against enzymes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11—DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1138—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against receptors or cell surface proteins
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y204/00—Glycosyltransferases (2.4)
    • C12Y204/02—Pentosyltransferases (2.4.2)
    • C12Y204/02001—Purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (2.4.2.1)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y207/00—Transferases transferring phosphorus-containing groups (2.7)
    • C12Y207/01—Phosphotransferases with an alcohol group as acceptor (2.7.1)
    • C12Y207/01037—Protein kinase (2.7.1.37)
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10—Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/11—Antisense
    • C12N2310/111—Antisense spanning the whole gene, or a large part of it
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10—Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/12—Type of nucleic acid catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10—Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/12—Type of nucleic acid catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes
    • C12N2310/121—Hammerhead
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10—Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/12—Type of nucleic acid catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes
    • C12N2310/122—Hairpin
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30—Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/31—Chemical structure of the backbone
    • C12N2310/315—Phosphorothioates
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30—Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/31—Chemical structure of the backbone
    • C12N2310/317—Chemical structure of the backbone with an inverted bond, e.g. a cap structure
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30—Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/32—Chemical structure of the sugar
    • C12N2310/321—2'-O-R Modification
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30—Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/32—Chemical structure of the sugar
    • C12N2310/322—2'-R Modification
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00—Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30—Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/33—Chemical structure of the base
    • C12N2310/332—Abasic residue

Definitions

  • This invention relates to methods and reagents for the treatment of diseases or conditions relating to the levels of expression of raf genes.
  • the Raf family of serine/threonine kinases function as cytoplasmic signaling proteins that transduce mitogenic signals in response to activation of various growth factor receptors (for reviews, see Daum, 1994 Trends in Biochem. Sci. 19, 474; Katz,
  • c-Raf is the cellular homolog of v-Raf, the transforming element of the murine sarcoma virus 3611.
  • the Raf family consists of three highly conserved isozymes in vertebrates: c-Raf-1, which is constitutively expressed in all tissues, A-Raf, which is expressed in urogenital tissue and B-Raf which is expressed in and cerebrum and testes (Storm, 1990, Oncogene 5, 345).
  • Raf is one of the major downstream effectors of Ras, a member of the class of small GDP/GTP-binding proteins involved in cellular signal transduction pathways (figure 35; Marshall, 1995, Molec. Reprod. Devel, 42, 493).
  • Appropriate mitogenic signals cause an increase in levels of the GTP -bound Ras.
  • Ras In its GTP-bound active state, Ras binds Raf and localizes it to the plasma membrane. This results in activation of the Raf kinase activity.
  • Activated Raf in turn phosphorylates MEK, thereby activating the MAP kinase signaling cascade leading to cell cycle progression. Amino terminal truncation of Raf leads to constitutively active protein.
  • Raf activation is triggered by a variety of growth factors and cytokines.
  • Raf activation has been observed in cardiac myocyte cultures stimulated by fibroblast growth factor (FGF), endothelin or phorbol ester (Bogoyevitch, 1995, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1).
  • FGF fibroblast growth factor
  • phorbol ester phorbol ester
  • Activation has also been seen in Swiss 3T3 cells treated with bombesin and platelet derived growth factor (Mitchell, 1995, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8623) or with colony stimulating factor or lipopolysacchride (Reimann, 1994, J. Immun.
  • Raf activation leads to induction of several immediate early transcription factors including NF-kB and AP-1 (Bruder, 1992, Genes Devel. 6, 545; Finco, 1993, J. Biol Chem. 268, 17676).
  • AP-1 regulates expression of a variety of proteases (Sato, 1994 Oncogene 8, 395; Gaire, 1994, J Biol Chem 269, 2032; Lauricell-Lefebvre, 1993, Invasion Metastasis 13, 289; Troen, 1991, Cell Growth Differ 2, 23).
  • a cascade of MMP and serine proteinase expression is implicated in the acquisition of an invasive phenotype as well as in angiogenesis in tumors (MacDougall, 1995, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 14, 351).
  • Raf signaling is expected to contribute to increased invasiveness in tumor cells, leading to metastasis.
  • Raf- 1 and Bcl-2 Coexpression studies of Raf- 1 and Bcl-2 have shown that these proteins bind and interact to synergistically suppress apoptosis (Wang, 1994, Oncogene 9, 2751). Thus, overexpression of Raf- 1 in tumor cells is likely to contribute to malignant transformation and increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Overexpression of c-Raf-1 is observed in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck taken from patients resistant to radiation therapy (Riva, 1995, Oral Oncol, Eur. J. Cancer 31B, 384) and in lung carcinomas (Rapp, 1988, The Oncogene Handbook, 213).
  • Activated (truncated) Raf has been detected in a number of human cancers including small-cell lung, stomach, renal, breast and laryngeal cancer (Rapp, 1988, The Oncogene Handbook, 213).
  • Antisense oligonucleo tides targeting c-Raf-1 were used to demonstrate that IL-2 stimulated growth of T cells requires c-raf (Riedel, 1993, EMr. J. Immunol. 23, 3146). Antisense oligonucleotides targeting c-Raf-1 in SQ-20B cells showed reduced Raf expression and increased radiation sensitivity (Sol Scheme, 1997, The Cancer J. from Scientific American 3, 13). Rapp et al. have disclosed a method for inhibiting c-Raf-1 gene expression using a vector expressing the gene in the antisense orientation (International PCT Publication No. WO 93/04170).
  • Antisense oligonucleotides targeting c-Raf-1 in SQ-20B cells showed reduced DNA synthesis in response to insulin stimulation in rat hepatoma cells (Tomkvist, 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13919).
  • Monia et al. have disclosed a method for inhibiting Raf expression using antisense oligonucleotides (U.S. Patent No. 5,563,255) and shown that antisense oligonucleotides targeting c-Raf-1 can inhibit Raf mRNA expression in cell culture, and inhibit growth of a variety of tumor types in human tumor xenograft models (Monia et al, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad.
  • This invention relates to identification, synthesis and use of nucleic acid catalysts to cleave RNA species that are required for cellular growth responses.
  • applicant describes the selection and function of ribozymes capable of cleaving RNA encoded by c-raf gene. Such ribozymes may be used to inhibit the hyper-proliferation of tumor cells in one or more cancers, restenosis, psoriasis, fibrosis and rheumatoid arthritis.
  • ribozymes that cleave c-raf RNA are described. Moreover, applicant shows that these ribozymes are able to inhibit gene expression and cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, and that the catalytic activity of the ribozymes is required for their inhibitory effect. From those of ordinary skill in the art, it is clear from the examples described herein, that other ribozymes that cleave target RNAs required for cell proliferation may be readily designed and are within the invention.
  • inhibitor is meant that the activity of c-raf or level of RNAs encoded by c-raf is reduced below that observed in the absence of the nucleic acid, particularly, inhibition with ribozymes is preferably below that level observed in the presence of an inactive
  • RNA molecule able to bind to the same site on the mRNA, but unable to cleave that
  • nucleic acid catalyst is meant a nucleic acid molecule capable of catalyzing (altering the velocity and/or rate of) a variety of reactions including the ability to repeatedly cleave other separate nucleic acid molecules (endonuclease activity) in a nucleotide base sequence-specific manner.
  • a molecule with endonuclease activity may have complementarity in a substrate binding region to a specified gene target, and also has an enzymatic activity that specifically cleaves RNA or DNA in that target.
  • the nucleic acid molecule with endonuclease activity is able to intramolecularly or intermolecularly cleave RNA or DNA and thereby inactivate a target RNA or DNA molecule.
  • This complementarity functions to allow sufficient hybridization of the enzymatic RNA molecule to the target RNA or DNA to allow the cleavage to occur.
  • the nucleic acids may be modified at the base, sugar, and/or phosphate groups.
  • the term enzymatic nucleic acid is used interchangeably with phrases such as ribozymes, catalytic RNA, enzymatic RNA, catalytic DNA, catalytic oligonucleotides, nucleozyme, DNAzyme, RNA enzyme, endoribonuclease, endonuclease, minizyme, leadzyme, oligozyme or DNA enzyme. All of these terminologies describe nucleic acid molecules with enzymatic activity.
  • nucleic acid catalysts described in the instant application are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in a nucleic acid catalyst of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site which is complementary to one or more of the target nucleic acid regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart a nucleic acid cleaving activity to the molecule.
  • substrate binding arm or “substrate binding domain” is meant that portion/region of a ribozyme which is complementary to (i.e., able to base-pair with) a portion of its substrate. Generally, such complementarity is 100%, but can be less if desired. For example, as few as 10 bases out of 14 may be base-paired. Such arms are shown generally in Figure 1 and 3. That is, these arms contain sequences within a ribozyme which are intended to bring ribozyme and target RNA together through complementary base-pairing interactions.
  • the ribozyme of the invention may have binding arms that are contiguous or non-contiguous and may be of varying lengths.
  • the length of the binding arm(s) are preferably greater than or equal to four nucleotides; specifically 12-100 nucleotides; more specifically 14-24 nucleotides long. If two binding arms are chosen, the design is such that the length of the binding arms are symmetrical (i.e., each of the binding arms is of the same length; e.g., five and five nucleotides, six and six nucleotides or seven and seven nucleotides long) or asymmetrical (i.e., the binding arms are of different length; e.g., six and three nucleotides; three and six nucleotides long; four and five nucleotides long; four and six nucleotides long; four and seven nucleotides long; and the like).
  • the nucleic acid catalyst is formed in a hammerhead or hairpin motif, but may also be formed in the motif of a hepatitis d virus, group I intron, group II intron or RNaseP RNA (in association with an RNA guide sequence) or Neurospora VS RNA.
  • Group II introns are described by Griffin et al, 1995, Chem. Biol. 2, 761; Michels and Pyle, 1995, Biochemistry 34, 2965; Pyle et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/22689; and of the Group I intron by Cech et al, U.S. Patent 4,987,071.
  • These specific motifs are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in a nucleic acid catalyst of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site which is complementary to one or more of the target gene RNA regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart an RNA cleaving activity to the molecule.
  • RNA to c-raf is meant to include those naturally occurring RNA molecules associated with cancer in various animals, including human, rodent, primate, rabbit and pig.
  • the equivalent RNA sequence also includes in addition to the coding region, regions such as 5 '-untranslated region, 3 '-untranslated region, introns, intron-exon junction and the like.
  • complementarity is meant a nucleic acid that can form hydrogen bond(s) with another RNA sequence by either traditional Watson-Crick or other non-traditional types (for example, Hoogsteen type) of base-paired interactions.
  • the invention provides a method for producing a class of enzymatic cleaving agents which exhibit a high degree of specificity for the RNA of a desired target.
  • the nucleic acid catalyst is preferably targeted to a highly conserved sequence region of a target mRNAs encoding c-raf proteins such that specific treatment of a disease or condition can be provided with either one or several enzymatic nucleic acids.
  • Such nucleic acid catalysts can be delivered exogenously to specific cells as required.
  • the ribozymes can be expressed from DNA/RNA vectors that are delivered to specific cells.
  • Such ribozymes are useful for the prevention of the diseases and conditions discussed above, and any other diseases or conditions that are related to the levels of c- Raf activity in a cell or tissue.
  • RNAs By “related” is meant that the inhibition of c-raf RNAs and thus reduction in the level of respective protein activity will relieve to some extent the symptoms of the disease or condition.
  • the ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the target sequences in TablesXII-XIX. Examples of such ribozymes are also shown in Tables XII-XIX. Examples of such ribozymes consist essentially of sequences defined in these Tables.
  • the active ribozyme contains an enzymatic center or core equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind mRNA such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such cleavage.
  • the invention features ribozymes that inhibit gene expression and/or cell proliferation.
  • RNA molecules contain substrate binding domains that bind to accessible regions of their target mRNAs.
  • the RNA molecules also contain domains that catalyze the cleavage of RNA.
  • the RNA molecules are preferably ribozymes of the hammerhead or hairpin motif. Upon binding, the ribozymes cleave the target mRNAs, preventing translation and protein accumulation. In the absence of the expression of the target gene, cell proliferation is inhibited.
  • ribozymes are added directly, or can be complexed with cationic lipids, packaged within liposomes, or otherwise delivered to target cells.
  • the nucleic acid or nucleic acid complexes can be locally administered to relevant tissues ex vivo, or in vivo through injection, infusion pump or stent, with or without their incorporation in biopolymers.
  • the ribozyme is administered to the site of c-raf expression (e.g., tumor cells) in an appropriate liposomal vehicle.
  • ribozymes that cleave target molecules and inhibit c-raf activity are expressed from transcription units inserted into DNA or RNA vectors.
  • the recombinant vectors are preferably DNA plasmids or viral vectors. Ribozyme expressing viral vectors could be constructed based on, but not limited to, adeno-associated virus, retrovirus, adenovirus, or alphavirus.
  • the recombinant vectors capable of expressing the ribozymes are delivered as described above, and persist in target cells.
  • viral vectors may be used that provide for transient expression of ribozymes. Such vectors might be repeatedly administered as necessary.
  • the ribozymes cleave the target mRNA. Delivery of ribozyme expressing vectors could be systemic, such as by intravenous or intramuscular administration, by administration to target cells ex-planted from the patient followed by reintroduction into the patient, or by any other means that would allow for introduction into the desired target cell (for a review see Couture and Stinchcomb, 1996, TIG., 12, 510).
  • ribozymes that cleave target molecules and inhibit cell proliferation are expressed from transcription units inserted into DNA, RNA, or viral vectors.
  • the recombinant vectors capable of expressing the ribozymes are locally delivered as described above, and transiently persist in smooth muscle cells.
  • other mammalian cell vectors that direct the expression of RNA may be used for this purpose.
  • patient is meant an organism which is a donor or recipient of explanted cells or the cells themselves.
  • Patient also refers to an organism to which nucleic acid -.
  • a patient is a mammal or mammalian cells. More preferably, a patient is a human or human cells.
  • vectors any nucleic acid- and/or viral-based technique used to deliver a desired nucleic acid.
  • ribozymes individually, or in combination or in conjunction with other drugs, can be used to treat diseases or conditions discussed above.
  • the patient may be treated, or other appropriate cells may be treated, as is evident to those skilled in the art.
  • the described ribozymes can be used in combination with other known treatments to treat conditions or diseases discussed above.
  • the described ribozymes could be used in combination with one or more known therapeutic agents to treat cancer.
  • the ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the sequences in the tables, shown as Seq. I.D. Nos. 1-501, 1078-1152, 1461-1768, 1841-1912, 2354-2794 and 2846-2956. Examples of such ribozymes are shown as Seq. I.D. Nos. 502-1002, 1003-1077, 1153-1460, 1769-1840, 1913-2353 and
  • Ribozymes that cleave the specified sites in Raf mRNAs represent a novel therapeutic approach to treat tumor angiogenesis, ocular diseases, rhuematoid arthritis, psoriasis and others. Applicant indicates that ribozymes are able to inhibit the activity of Raf and that the catalytic activity of the ribozymes is required for their inhibitory effect. Those of ordinary skill in the art will find that it is clear from the examples described that other ribozymes that cleave Raf mRNAs may be readily designed and are within the invention.
  • Figure 1 shows the secondary structure model for seven different classes of nucleic acid catalysts. Arrow indicates the site of cleavage. indicate the target sequence. Lines interspersed with dots are meant to indicate tertiary interactions. - is meant to indicate base-paired interaction.
  • Group I Intron: P1-P9.0 represent various stem-loop structures (Cech et al, 1994, Nature Struc. Bio., 1, 273).
  • Group II Intron 5'SS means 5' splice site; 3'SS means 3 '-splice site; IBS means intron binding site; EBS means exon binding site (Pyle et al, 1994, Biochemistry, 33, 2716).
  • VS RNA: I- VI are meant to indicate six stem-loop structures; shaded regions are meant to indicate tertiary interaction (Collins, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/19577).
  • Hammerhead Ribozyme I-III are meant to indicate three stem-loop structures; stems I-III can be of any length and may be symmetrical or asymmetrical (Usman et al, 1996, Curr. Op. Struct. Bio., 1, 527).
  • Helix 2 and helix 5 may be covalently linked by one or more bases (i.e., r is 1 base). Helix 1, 4 or 5 may also be extended by 2 or more base pairs (e.g., 4 - 20 base pairs) to stabilize the ribozyme structure, and preferably is a protein binding site.
  • each N and N' independently is any normal or modified base and each dash represents a potential base- pairing interaction. These nucleotides may be modified at the sugar, base or phosphate. Complete base-pairing is not required in the helices, but is preferred.
  • Helix 1 and 4 can be of any size (i.e., o and p is each independently from 0 to any number, e.g., 20) as long as some base-pairing is maintained.
  • Essential bases are shown as specific bases in the structure, but those in the art will recognize that one or more may be modified chemically (abasic, base, sugar and/or phosphate modifications) or replaced with another base without significant effect.
  • Helix 4 can be formed from two separate molecules, i.e., without a connecting loop.
  • the connecting loop when present may be a ribonucleotide with or without modifications to its base, sugar or phosphate, "q" is 2 bases.
  • the connecting loop can also be replaced with a non-nucleotide linker molecule.
  • H refers to bases A, U, or C.
  • Y refers to pyrimidine bases.
  • " " refers to a covalent bond.
  • Figure 2 shows a general approach to accessible site and target discovery using nucleic acid catalysts.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a hammerhead ribozyme.
  • the consensus hammerhead cleavage site in a target RNA is a "U” followed by "H” (anything but “G”).
  • the hammerhead ribozyme cleaves after the "H.”
  • This simple di-nucleotide sequence occurs, on average, every 5 nt in a target RNA.
  • Stems I and III are formed by hybridization of the hammerhead binding arms with the complementary sequence in target RNA; it is these binding arms that confer specificity to the hammerhead ribozyme for its target.
  • the binding arms of the hammerhead are interrupted by the catalytic domain that forms part of the structure responsible for cleavage.
  • Figure 4 shows a scheme for the design and synthesis of a Defined Library: simultaneous screen of 400 different ICAM-targeted ribozymes is used as an example. DNA oligonucleotides encoding each ICAM-targeted ribozyme are synthesized individually (A), pooled (B), then cloned and converted to retroviral vectors as a pool. The resulting retroviral vector particles are used to transduce a target cell line that expresses ICAM (B).
  • ICAM- low Cells expressing ribozymes that inhibit ICAM expression (ICAM- low) are sorted from cells expressing ineffective ribozymes by FACS sorting (C), effective ribozymes enriched in the ICAM-low population of cells are identified by filter hybridization (D).
  • Figure 5 A) shows randomization of the binding arms of a hammerhead ribozyme to produce a Random Library.
  • the binding arms can be of any length and any symmetry, i.e., symmetrical or assymmetrical.
  • B) shows complexities of hammerhead Random Ribozyme Libraries comprising a 6-nt or a 7-nt long binding arms.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic overview of Target Discovery strategy.
  • An oligonucleotide is prepared in a single reaction vessel in which all 4 standard nucleotides are incorporated in a random fashion in the target binding arm(s) of the ribozyme to produce a pool of all possible ribozymes (A).
  • This pool is cloned into an appropriate vector in a single tube to produce the Random Library expression vector (B) and retroviral vector particles are produced from this pool in a single tube (C).
  • the resulting Random Ribozyme Library retroviral expression vector pool is then used to transduce a cell type of interest (D).
  • Cells exhibiting the desired phenotype are then separated from the rest of the population using a number of possible selection strategies (E and see text).
  • Genes that are critical for expression of the selected phenotype can then be identified by sequencing the target binding arms of ribozymes contained in the selected population (F).
  • FIG. 7 shows an example of application of Random Ribozyme Libraries to identify genes critical for the induction of ICAM expression.
  • Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) are transduced with a Random Ribozyme Library (A), ICAM expression is induced using TNF-alpha (B), and cells expressing ribozymes that inhibit ICAM induction are selected from cells expressing ineffective ribozymes by sorting ICAM-low cells (C).
  • Genes critical for ICAM induction are identified by sequencing the binding arms of the ribozymes that inhibit ICAM expression in the ICAM- low cells.
  • Figure 8 is an example of an efficient cloning strategy for producing a Defined or Random Ribozyme Libraries.
  • DNA oligos encoding ribozyme coding regions and restriction sites for cloning are designed to also contain a stem-loop structure on the 3' ends (1).
  • This stem loop forms an intramolecular primer site for extension to form a double-stranded molecule by DNA polymerase (2).
  • the double-stranded fragment is cleaved with appropriate restriction endonucleases to produce suitable ends for subsequent cloning (3).
  • Figure 9 shows molecular analysis of the PNP -targeted Defined Ribozyme
  • the sequencing primer used reads the non-coding strand of the region encoding the ribozymes. Note that the sequence diverges at the binding arm, converges at the catalytic domain (5'
  • Figure 10 shows molecular analysis of the PNP-targeted Defined Ribozyme Library: sequence analysis after propagation in Sup TI human T cells and selection in 10 mmol 6-thioguanosine. Sup TI cells were transduced with retroviral vector-based
  • Ribozyme Library comprised of 40 different PNP-targeted ribozyme oligos cloned into the U6+27 transcription unit ( Figure 11D).
  • the cells were propagated for 2 weeks following transduction, then subjected to 16 days of selection in 10 mmol 6- thioguanosine.
  • Surviving cells were harvested, and ribozyme sequences present in the selected population of cells were amplified and sequenced. Note that, relative to the original Library where sequences of the binding arms were ambiguous due to the presence of 40 different ribozymes (Figure 9), the sequence of the binding arms in the selected population corresponded to only 1 of the 40 ribozymes included in the Library.
  • Figure 11 is a schematic representation of transcription units suitable for expression ribozyme library of the instant invention.
  • A) is a diagrammatic representation of some RNA polymerase (Pol) II and III ribozyme (RZ) transcription units.
  • CMV Promoter Driven is a Pol II transcript driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter; the transcript can designed such that the ribozyme is at the 5'- region, 3 '-region or some where in between and the transcript optionally comprises an intron.
  • tRNA-DC is a Pol III transcript driven by a transfer RNA (tRNA) promoter, wherein the ribozyme is at the 3'- end of the transcript; the transcript optionally comprises a stem-loop structure 3' of the ribozyme.
  • U6+27 is a Pol III transcript driven by a U6 small nuclear (snRNA) promoter; ribozyme is 3' of a sequence that is homologous to 27 nucleotides at the 5 '-end of a U6 snRNA; the transcript optionally comprise a stem-loop structure at the 3 '-end of the ribozyme.
  • VAI-90 is a Pol III transcript driven by an adenovirus VA promoter; ribozyme is 3' of a sequence homologous to 90 nucleotides at the 5 '-end of a VAI RNA; the transcript optionally comprises a stem-loop structure at the 3 '-end of the ribozyme.
  • VAC is a Pol III transcript driven by an adenovirus VAI promoter; the ribozyme is inserted towards the 3'- region of the VA RNA and into a S35 motif, which is a stable greater than or equal to 8 bp long intramolecular stem formed by base-paired inteaction between sequences in the 5 '-region and the 3 '-region flanking the ribozyme (see Beigelman et al, International PCT Application No. WO 96/18736); the S35 domain positions the ribozyme away from the main transcript as an independent domain.
  • TRZ is a Pol III transcript diven by a tRNA promoter; ribozyme is inserted in the S35 domain and is positioned away from the main transcript (see Beigelman et al, International PCT Application No. WO 96/18736).
  • B) shows various transcription units based on the UI small nuclear RNA (snRNA) system.
  • C) is a schematic representation of a retroviral vectors encoding ribozyme genes. NGFR, nerve growth factor receptor is used as a selectable marker, LTR, long terminal repeat of a retrovirus, UTR, untranslated region.
  • D) shows a U6+27 hammerhead ribozyme transcription unit based on the U6 snRNA.
  • the ribozyme transcript comprises the first 27 nt from the U6 snRNA which is reported to be necessary for the stability of the transcript.
  • the transcript terminates with a stretch of uridine residues.
  • the hammerhead ribozyme shown in the figure has random (N) binding arm sequence.
  • Figure 12 is a schematic representation of a combinatorial approach to the screening of ribozyme variants.
  • FIG 13 shows the sequence of a Starting Ribozyme to be used in the screening approach described in Figure 12.
  • the Starting Ribozyme is a hammerhead (HH) ribozyme designed to cleave target RNA A (HH-A).
  • Position 7 in HH-A is also referred to in this application as position 24 to indicate that U24 is .
  • the 24th nucleotide incorporated into the HH-A ribozyme during chemical synthesis Similarly, positions 4 and 3 are also referred to as positions 27 and 28, respectively. s indicates phosphorothioate substitution.
  • Lower case alphabets in the HH-A sequence indicate 2'- O-methyl nucleotides; uppercase alphabets in the sequence of HH-A at positions 5, 6, 8, 12 and 15J indicate ribonucleotides. Positions 3, 4 and 7 are shown as uppercase, large alphabets to indicate the positions selected for screening using the method shown in Figure 12. • indicates base-paired interaction. iB represents abasic inverted deoxy ribose moiety.
  • Figure 14 shows a scheme for screening variants of HH-A ribozyme. Positions
  • Figure 15 shows non-limiting examples of some of the nucleotide analogs that can be used to construct ribozyme libraries.
  • 2'-O-MTM-U represents 2'-O-methylthiomethyl uridine
  • 2'-O-MTM-C represents 2'-O-methylthiomethyl cytidine
  • 6-Me-U represents 6- methyl uridine (Beigelman et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/18736 which is incorporated by reference herein).
  • Figure 16 shows activity of HH-A variant ribozymes as determined in a cell-based assay. * indicates the substitution that provided the most desirable attribute in a ribozyme.
  • Figure 17A shows the sequence and chemical composition of ribozymes that showed the most desirable attribute in a cell. -. _
  • Figure 17B shows formulae for four different novel ribozyme motifs.
  • Figure 18 shows the formula foe a novel ribozyme motif.
  • Figure 19 shows the sequence of a Starting Ribozyme to be used in the screening approach described in Figure 14.
  • a HH ribozyme targeted against RNA B (HH-B) was chosen for analysis of the loop II sequence variants.
  • Figure 20 shows a scheme for screening loop-II sequence variants of HH-B ribozyme.
  • Figure 21 shows the relative catalytic rates (k ⁇ ) for RNA cleavage reactions catalyzed by HH-B loop-II variant ribozymes.
  • Figure 22 is a schematic representation of HH-B ribozyme-substrate complex and the activity of HH-B ribozyme with either the 5'-GAAA-3' or the 5'-GUUA-3' loop-II sequence.
  • Figure 23 shows a scheme for using a combinatorial approach to identify potential ribozyme targets by varying the binding arms.
  • Figure 24 shows a scheme for using a combinatorial approach to identify novel ribozymes by the varying putative catalytic domain sequence.
  • Figure 25 shows a table of accessible sites within a Bcl-2 transcript ((975 nucleotides) which were found using the combinatorial in vitro screening process.
  • Figure 26 shows a table of accessible sites with a Kras transcript (796 nucleotides) which were found using the combinatorial in vitro screening process as well as a graphic depiction of relative activity of ribozymes to those sites.
  • Figure 27 shows a table of accessible sites with a UP A transcript (400 nucleotides) which were found using the combinatorial in vitro screening process as well as a graphic depiction of relative activity of ribozymes to those sites.
  • Figure 28 shows a graph displaying data from a ribonuclease protection assay
  • the graph includes an untreated control and an irrelevant ribozyme (no complementarity with Bcl-2 mRNA).
  • Figure 29 displays a schematic representation of NTP synthesis using nucleoside substrates.
  • Figure 30 depicts a scheme for the synthesis of a xylo ribonucleoside phosphoramidite.
  • Figure 31 is a diagrammatic representation of hammerhead (HH) ribozyme targeted against stromelysin RNA (site 617) with various modifications.
  • Figure 32 is a is a schematic representation of a one pot deprotection of RNA synthesized using RNA phosphoramidite chemistry.
  • Figure 33 is a comparison of a one-pot and a two-pot process for deprotection of RNA.
  • Figure 34 shows the results of a one-pot deprotection with different polar organic reagents.
  • Figure 35 is a diagrammatic represention of ras signal transduction pathway.
  • Figure 36 is a diagrammatic representation of hammerhead ribozymes targeted against c-raf RNA.
  • Figure 37 is a graphical representation of c-raf 2' -C- allyl 1120 hammerhead (HH) ribozyme-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation.
  • Figure 38 is a graphical representation of inhibition of cell proliferation mediated by c-raf 2'-C-allyl 1120 and 1251 hammerhead (HH) ribozymes.
  • Figure 39 shows the effects of flt-1 ribozymes (active/inactive) on LLC-HM primary tumor growth in mice.
  • Figure 40 shows the effects of flt-1 ribozymes on LLC-HM primary tumor volume immediately following the cessation of treatment.
  • Figure 41 shows the effects of flt-1 ribozymes on lung metastatic indices (number of metastases and lung mass).
  • Figure 42 shows the effects of flk-1 ribozymes (active/inactive) on LLC-HM primary tumor growth in mice.
  • Figure 43 shows the effects of flk-1 ribozymes on LLC-HM primary tumor volume immediately following the cessation of treatment.
  • Figure 44 shows the effects of flk-1 ribozymes on lung metastatic indices (number of metastases and lung mass).
  • Catalytic nucleic acid molecules are nucleic acid molecules capable of catalyzing one or more of a variety of reactions, including the ability to repeatedly cleave other separate nucleic acid molecules in a nucleotide base sequence-specific manner.
  • Such nucleic acid catalysts can be used, for example, to target cleavage of virtually any RNA transcript (Zaug et al, 324, Nature 429 1986 ; Cech, 260 JAMA 3030, 1988; and Jefferies et al, 17 Nucleic Acids Research 1371, 1989).
  • Catalytic nucleic acid molecules mean any nucleotide base-comprising molecule having the ability to repeatedly act on one or more types of molecules, including but not limited to nucleic acid catalysts.
  • such molecules include those that are able to repeatedly cleave nucleic acid molecules, peptides, or other polymers, and those that are able to cause the polymerization of such nucleic acids and other polymers.
  • such molecules include ribozymes, DNAzymes, external guide sequences and the like. It is expected that such molecules will also include modified nucleotides compared to standard nucleotides found in DNA and RNA.
  • nucleic acid catalysts can be designed to cleave specific RNA targets within the background of cellular RNA. Such a cleavage event renders the RNA non- functional and abrogates protein expression from that RNA. In this manner, synthesis of a protein associated with a disease state can be selectively inhibited.
  • nucleic acid catalysts can be used to validate a therapeutic gene target and/or to determine the function of a gene in a biological system (Christoffersen, 1997, Nature Biotech. 15, 483).
  • enzymatic RNA molecules derived from naturally occurring self-cleaving RNAs (see Table I). Each can catalyze the hydrolysis of RNA phosphodiester bonds in trans (and thus can cleave other RNA molecules) under physiological conditions.
  • enzymatic nucleic acids act by first binding to a substrate/target RNA. Such binding occurs through the substrate/target binding portion of an nucleic acid catalyst which is held in close proximity to an enzymatic portion of the molecule that acts to cleave the target RNA.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid first recognizes and then binds a target RNA through complementary base-pairing, and once bound to the correct site, acts enzymatically to cut the target RNA.
  • RNA Strategic and selective cleavage of such a target RNA will destroy its ability to direct synthesis of an encoded protein. After an enzymatic nucleic acid has bound and cleaved its RNA target, it is released from that RNA to search for another target and thus can repeatedly bind and cleave new targets.
  • ribozyme The enzymatic nature of a ribozyme is advantageous over other technologies, since the effective concentration of ribozyme sufficient to effect a therapeutic treatment is generally lower than that of an antisense oligonucleotide. This advantage reflects the ability of the ribozyme to act enzymatically.
  • a single ribozyme (enzymatic nucleic acid) molecule is able to cleave many molecules of target RNA.
  • the ribozyme is a highly specific inhibitor, with the specificity of inhibition depending not only on the base-pairing mechanism of binding, but also on the mechanism by which the molecule inhibits the expression of the RNA to which it binds.
  • the inhibition is caused by cleavage of the RNA target and so specificity is defined as the ratio of the rate of cleavage of the targeted RNA over the rate of cleavage of non-targeted RNA.
  • This cleavage mechanism is dependent upon factors additional to those involved in base- pairing. Thus, it is thought that the specificity of action of a ribozyme is greater than that of antisense oligonucleotide binding the same RNA site.
  • ribozymes that are optimal for catalytic activity would contribute significantly to any strategy that employs RNA-cleaving ribozymes for the purpose of regulating gene expression.
  • the hammerhead ribozyme functions with a catalytic rate (k C ⁇ J) of ⁇ 1 min -1 in the presence of saturating (10 mM) concentrations of Mg 2+ cofactor.
  • k C ⁇ J catalytic rate
  • Mg 2+ concentrations concentrations of Mg 2+ cofactor
  • the RNase P holoenzyme can catalyze pre-tRNA cleavage with a ⁇ cat °f ⁇ 30 min -1 under optimal assay conditions.
  • An artificial 'RNA ligase' ribozyme (Bartel et al, supra) has been shown to catalyze the corresponding self-modification reaction with a rate of -100 min -1 .
  • certain modified hammerhead ribozymes that have substrate binding arms made of DNA catalyze RNA cleavage with multiple turn-over rates that approach 100 min -1 .
  • nucleotide as used herein is as recognized in the art to include natural bases (standard), and modified bases well known in the art. Such bases are generally located at the 1' position of a sugar moiety.
  • Nucleotide generally comprise a base, sugar and a phosphate group.
  • the nucleotides can be unmodified or modified at the sugar, phosphate and/or base moiety, (also referred to interchangeably as nucleotide analogs, modified nucleotides, non-natural nucleotides, non-standard nucleotides and other ; see for example, Usman and McSwiggen, supra; Eckstein et al, International PCT Publication No.
  • base modifications that can be introduced into enzymatic nucleic acids without significantly effecting their catalytic activity include, inosine, purine, pyridin-4-one, pyridin-2-one, phenyl, pseudouracil, 2, 4, 6-trimethoxy benzene, 3-methyl uracil, dihydrouridine, naphthyl, aminophenyl, 5-alkylcytidines (e.g., 5-methylcytidine), 5-alkyluridines (e.g., ribothymidine), 5-halouridine (e.g., 5-bromouridine) or 6-azapyrimidines or 6- alkylpyrimidines (e.g., 6-methyluridine) and others (Burgin et al, 1996, Biochemistry, 35, 14090).
  • 5-alkylcytidines e.g., 5-methylcytidine
  • 5-alkyluridines e.g., ribothymidine
  • 5-halouridine
  • modified bases in this aspect is meant nucleotide bases other than adenine, guanine, cytosine and uracil at 1' position or their equivalents; such bases may be used within the catalytic core of the enzyme and/or in the substrate-binding regions.
  • catalytic activity of the molecules described in the instant invention can be optimized as described by Draper et al., supra. The details will not be repeated here, but include altering the length of the ribozyme binding arms, or chemically synthesizing ribozymes with modifications (base, sugar and/or phosphate) that prevent their degradation by serum ribonucleases and/or enhance their enzymatic activity (see e.g., Eckstein et al, International Publication No. WO 92/07065; Perrault et al, 1990 Nature 344, 565; Pieken et al, 1991 Science 253, 314; Usman and Cedergren, 1992 Trends in Biochem. Sci.
  • Ribozymes are modified to enhance stability and/or enhance catalytic activity by modification with nuclease resistant groups, for example, 2'-amino, 2'-C-allyl, 2'- flouro, 2'-O-methyl, 2'-H, nucleotide base modifications (for a review see Usman and Cedergren, 1992 TIBS 17, 34; Usman et al, 1994 Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 31, 163; Burgin et al, 1996 Biochemistry 35, 14090).
  • nuclease resistant groups for example, 2'-amino, 2'-C-allyl, 2'- flouro, 2'-O-methyl, 2'-H, nucleotide base modifications
  • nucleic acid catalysts having chemical modifications which maintain or enhance enzymatic activity is provided.
  • Such a nucleic acid is also, generally, more resistant to nucleases than the corresponding unmodified nucleic acid.
  • the activity may not be significantly lowered.
  • ribozymes are useful in a cell and/or in vivo even if activity over all is reduced 10 fold (Burgin et al, 1996, Biochemistry, 35, 14090).
  • modifications herein are said to "maintain" the enzymatic activity on all RNA ribozyme.
  • the nucleic acid catalysts of the invention are added directly, or can be complexed with cationic lipids, packaged within liposomes, or otherwise delivered to smooth muscle cells.
  • the RNA or RNA complexes can be locally administered to relevant tissues through the use of a catheter, infusion pump or stent, with or without their incorporation in biopolymers.
  • other nucleic acid catalysts that cleave target nucleic acid may be derived and used as described above. Specific examples of nucleic acid catalysts of the instant invention are provided below in the Tables and figures. Sullivan, et al, WO 94/02595, describes the general methods for delivery of nucleic acid catalysts.
  • Ribozymes may be administered to cells by a variety of methods known to those familiar to the art, including, but not restricted to, encapsulation in liposomes, by iontophoresis, or by incorporation into other vehicles, such as hydrogels, cyclodextrins, biodegradable nanocapsules, and bioadhesive microspheres.
  • ribozymes may be directly delivered ex vivo to cells or tissues with or without the aforementioned vehicles.
  • the RNA vehicle combination is locally delivered by direct injection or by use of a catheter, infusion pump or stent.
  • routes of delivery include, but are not limited to, intravascular, intramuscular, subcutaneous or joint injection, aerosol inhalation, oral (tablet or pill form), topical, systemic, ocular, intraperitoneal and/or intrathecal delivery. More detailed descriptions of ribozyme delivery and administration are provided in Sullivan et al, supra and Draper et al, WO 93/23569 which have been incorporated by reference herein.
  • nucleic acid catalysts can be delivered exogenously to specific cells as required.
  • the small size (less than 60 nucleotides, preferably between 30-40 nucleotides in length) of the molecule allows the cost of treatment to be reduced.
  • ribozymes delivered exogenously must remain stable within cells until translation of the target RNA has been inhibited long enough to reduce the levels of the undesirable protein. This period of time varies between hours to days depending upon the disease state.
  • ribozymes must be resistant to nucleases in order to function as effective intracellular therapeutic agents. Improvements in the chemical synthesis of RNA (Wincott et al, 1995 Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2677; incorporated by reference herein) have expanded the ability to modify ribozymes by introducing nucleotide modifications to enhance their nuclease stability as described above. o
  • RNA molecules are chemically synthesized and purified by methodologies based on the use of tetrazole to activate the RNA phosphoramidite, ethanolic-NH4OH to remove the exocyclic amino protecting groups, tetra-n- butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) to remove the -OH alkylsilyl protecting groups, and gel purification and analysis of the deprotected RNA.
  • TBAF tetra-n- butylammonium fluoride
  • Examples of chemical synthesis, deprotection, purification and analysis procedures for RNA are provided by Usman et al., 1987 J. Am. Chem. Soc, 109, 7845; Scaringe et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 5433- 5341; Perreault et al. Biochemistry 1991, 30 4020-4025; Slim and Gait Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 1183-1188. All the above noted references are all hereby incorporated by reference herein.
  • nucleic acid motifs e.g., antisense oligonucleotides, hammerhead or the hairpin ribozymes
  • small nucleic acid motifs e.g., antisense oligonucleotides, hammerhead or the hairpin ribozymes
  • the simple structure of these molecules increases the ability of the nucleic acid to invade targeted regions of the mRNA structure.
  • these nucleic acid molecules can also be expressed within cells from eukaryotic promoters (e.g., Izant and Weintraub, 1985 Science 229, 345; McGarry and Lindquist, 1986 Proc. Natl. Acad.
  • nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2259 any nucleic acid can be expressed in eukaryotic cells from the appropriate DNA RNA vector.
  • the activity of such nucleic acids can be augmented by their release from the primary transcript by a ribozyme (Draper et al, PCT WO93/23569, and Sullivan et al, PCT WO94/02595, both hereby incorporated in their totality by reference herein; Ohkawa et al, 1992 Nucleic Acids Symp.
  • the ribozymes were chemically synthesized.
  • the method of synthesis used follows the procedure for normal RNA synthesis as described in Usman et al, 1987 J. Am. Chem. Soc, 109, 7845; Scaringe et al, 1990 Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 5433; and Wincott et al, 1995 Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2677-2684 and makes use of common nucleic acid protecting and coupling groups, such as dimethoxytrityl at the 5'-end, and phosphoramidites at the 3'-end. Small scale synthesis were conducted on a 394 Applied Biosystems, Inc.
  • R ⁇ A Deprotection of the R ⁇ A was performed as follows.
  • MA methylamine
  • the supernatant was removed from the polymer support.
  • the support was washed three times with 1.0 mL of EtOH:MeC ⁇ :H2 ⁇ /3:l :l, vortexed and the supernatant was then added to the first supernatant.
  • the combined supernatants, containing the oligoribonucleotide, were dried to a white powder.
  • TEA » HF/NMP solution 250 ⁇ L of a solution of 1.5mL N-methylpyrrolidinone, 750 ⁇ L TEA and 1.0 mL TEA » 3HF to provide a 1.4M HF concentration
  • HF/NMP solution 250 ⁇ L of a solution of 1.5mL N-methylpyrrolidinone, 750 ⁇ L TEA and 1.0 mL TEA » 3HF to provide a 1.4M HF concentration
  • the TEAB solution was loaded onto a Qiagen 500® anion exchange cartridge (Qiagen Inc.) that was prewashed with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL). After washing the loaded cartridge with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL), the R ⁇ A was eluted with 2 M TEAB (10 mL) and dried down to a white powder.
  • Qiagen 500® anion exchange cartridge Qiagen Inc.
  • oligoribonucleotides For high throughput chemical synthesis of oligoribonucleotides, it is important that the two main steps involved in the deprotection of oligoribonucleotides (i.e., aqueous basic treatment to remove exocyclic amino protecting groups and phosphate protecting groups and fluoride treatment to remove the 2' -OH alkylsilyl protecting groups such as the tButylDiMethylSilyl) are condensed.
  • aqueous basic treatment to remove exocyclic amino protecting groups and phosphate protecting groups
  • fluoride treatment to remove the 2' -OH alkylsilyl protecting groups such as the tButylDiMethylSilyl
  • Stinchcomb et al, supra describe a time-efficient ( ⁇ 2 hrs) one-pot deprotection protocol based on anhydrous methylamine and triethylamine trihydrogen fluoride. Since it has recently been reported that water contamination during fluoride treatment may be detrimental to the efficiency of the desilylation reaction (Hogrefe et al, Nucleic Acids Res. (1993), 21 4739-4741), it is necessary to use an anhydrous solution of base such as a 33% methylamine in absolute ethanol followed by neat triethylamine trihydro fluoride to effectively deprotect oligoribonucleotides in a one-pot fashion.
  • base such as a 33% methylamine in absolute ethanol followed by neat triethylamine trihydro fluoride
  • a 1 : 1 mixture of the ethanolic methylamine solution and different polar additives such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol, hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), l-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) or 2- methoxyethyl ether (glyme).
  • DMSO dimethylsulfoxide
  • DMF N,N-dimethylformamide
  • HMPA hexamethylphosphoramide
  • NMP l-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
  • 2- methoxyethyl ether glyme
  • the deprotection process commonly involves the deprotection of the exocyclic amino protecting groups by NH4OH, which is time consuming (6-24 h) and inefficient. This step is then followed by treatment with TBAF to facilitate the removal of alkylsilyl protecting groups, which again is time consuming and not very effective in achieving efficient deprotection.
  • the optimized conditions make use of aqueous methylamine at 65°C for 15 minutes in place of the ammonium hydroxide cocktail to remove exocyclic amino protecting groups while the desilylation treatment needed to remove the 2'-OH alkylsilyl protecting groups utilizes a mixture of triethylamine trihydrogen fluoride (TEA.3 ⁇ F), N-methyl- pyrrolidinone and triethylamine at 65°C for 90 minutes, thereby replacing tetrabutyl ammonium fluoride.
  • TSA.3 ⁇ F triethylamine trihydrogen fluoride
  • N-methyl- pyrrolidinone N-methyl- pyrrolidinone
  • triethylamine at 65°C for 90 minutes
  • This invention concerns a one-pot process for the deprotection of RNA molecules.
  • This invention features a novel method for the removal of protecting groups from the nucleic acid base and 2'-OH groups, which accelerates the process for generating synthetic RNA in a high throughput manner (e.g., in a 96 well format).
  • RNA synthesis of RNA is generally accomplished using a traditional column format on a RNA synthesizer where only one oligoribonucleotide is synthesized at a time. Simultaneous synthesis of more than one RNA molecule in a time efficient manner requires alternate methods to the traditional column format, such as synthesis in a 96 well plate format where up to 96 RNA molecules can be synthesized at the same time.
  • the invention features a one-pot process for rapid deprotection of RNA.
  • the invention features the use of a 1 J mixture of the ethanolic methylamine solution and a polar additive, such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol, hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), 1- methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP), 2-methoxyethyl ether (glyme) or the like. More specifically, dimethylsufoxide is used to partially deprotect oligoribonucleotides (Figure 32). A comparison of the one pot and two pot deprotection methods are outlined and demonstrated in Figure 33.
  • DMSO dimethylsulfoxide
  • DMF N,N-dimethylformamide
  • HMPA hexamethylphosphoramide
  • NMP 1- methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
  • Glyme 2-methoxyethyl ether
  • This invention also concerns a rapid (high through-put) deprotection of RNA in a 96-well plate format. More specifically rapid deprotection of enzymatic RNA molecules in greater than microgram quantities with high biological activity is featured. It has been determined that the recovery of enzymatically active RNA in high yield and quantity is dependent upon certain critical steps used during its deprotection.
  • the invention features a process for one-pot deprotection of RNA molecules comprising protecting groups, comprising the steps of: a) contacting the RNA with a mixture of anhydrous alkylamine (where alkyl can be branched or unbranched, ethyl, propyl or butyl and is preferably methyl, e.g., methylamine), trialkylamine (where alkyl can be branched or unbranched, methyl, propyl or butyl and is preferably ethyl, e.g., ethylamine) and dimethylsulfoxide, preferably in a 10:3:13, or 1:0.3:1 proportion at temperature 20-30 °C for about 30-100 minutes, preferably 90 minutes, to remove the exocyclic amino (base) protecting groups and the phosphate protecting group (e.g., 2-cyanoethyl) (vs 4-20 h at 55-65 °C using
  • anhydrous alkylamine where alkyl can be
  • RNA NH 4 OH/EtOH or NH 3 /EtOH, or 10-15 min at 65 °C using 40% aqueous methylamine) under conditions suitable for partial deprotection of the RNA; b) contacting the partially deprotected RNA with anhydrous triethylamine»hydrogen fluoride (3HF » TEA) and heating at about 50-70 °C, preferably at 65 °C, for about 5-30 min, preferably 15 min to remove the 2 '-hydroxyl protecting group (vs 8 - 24 h using TBAF, or TEA » 3HF for 24 h
  • ammonium bicarbonate buffer is perfectly suited to retain the 5'-O-dimethoxytrityl group at the 5 '-end of the oligoribonucleotide thereby facilitating a reverse phase-based solid-phase extraction purification protocol.
  • one-pot deprotection is meant that the process of deprotection RNA is carried out in one container instead of multiple containers as in two-pot deprotection.
  • the invention features a process for one pot deprotection of RNA molecules comprising protecting groups, comprising the steps of: a) contacting the RNA with a mixture of anhydrous alkylamine (where alkyl can be branched or unbranched, ethyl, propyl or butyl and is preferably methyl, e.g., methylamine), and dimethylsulfoxide, preferably in a 1:1 proportion at 20-30 °C temperature for about 30-100 minutes, preferably 90 minutes, to remove the exocyclic amino (base) protecting groups and the phosphate protecting group (e.g., 2-cyanoethyl) (vs 4-20 h at 55-65 °C using NH 4 OH/EtOH or NH 3 /EtOH, or 10-15 min at 65°C using 40% aqueous methylamine) under conditions suitable for partial deprotection of the RNA; b) contacting the partially deprotected RNA with anhydrous triethylamine'hydr
  • the reaction can then be quenched by using aqueous ammonium bicarbonate (1.4 M).
  • aqueous ammonium bicarbonate 1.4 M
  • some other buffers can be used to quench the desilylation reaction (i.e., triethylammonium bicarbonate, ammonium acetate)
  • the ammonium bicarbonate buffer is perfectly suited to retain the 5'-O-dimethoxytrityl group at the 5 '-end of the oligoribonucleotide thereby facilitating a reverse phase-based solid-phase extraction purification protocol.
  • the invention features a process for RNA deprotection where the exocyclic amino and phosphate deprotection reaction is performed with the ethanolic methylamine solution at room temperature for about 90 min or at 65°C for 15 min or at 45 °C for 30 min or at 35°C for 60 min.
  • the process for deprotection of RNA of the present invention is used to deprotect a ribozyme synthesized using a column format as described in (Scaringe et al, supra; Wicott et al, supra).
  • Inactive hammerhead ribozymes were synthesized by substituting a U for G5 and a U for A14 (numbering from Hertel, K. J., et al, 1992, Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 3252).
  • Hairpin ribozymes are synthesized in two parts and annealed to reconstruct the active ribozyme (Chowrira and Burke, 1992 Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 2835-2840). Ribozymes are also synthesized from DNA templates using bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (Milligan and Uhlenbeck, 1989, Methods Enzymol 180, 51).
  • Ribozymes are modified to enhance stability and/or enhance catalytic activity by modification with nuclease resistant groups, for example, 2'-amino, 2'-C-allyl, 2'-flouro, 2'-O-methyl, 2'-H, nucleotide base modifications (for a review see Usman and Cedergren,
  • Ribozymes were purified by gel electrophoresis using general methods or are purified by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; See Stinchcomb et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 95/23225, the totality of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) and are resuspended in water.
  • HPLC high pressure liquid chromatography
  • sequences of the ribozymes that are chemically synthesized, useful in this study are shown in Tables XII-XIX. Those in the art will recognize that these sequences are representative only of many more such sequences where the enzymatic portion of the ribozyme (all but the binding arms) is altered to affect activity.
  • stem-loop II sequence of hammerhead ribozymes can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequences provided a minimum of two base-paired stem structure can form.
  • stem-loop IV sequence of hairpin ribozymes can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequence, provided a minimum of two base-paired stem structure can form.
  • sequences listed in Tables XII-XIX may be formed of ribonucleotides or other nucleotides or non-nucleotides. Such ribozymes (which have enzymatic activity) are equivalent to the ribozymes described specifically in the Tables.
  • nucleoside triphosphates as precursor molecules to assemble oligonucleotides. Each nucleotide is attached by a phosphodiester bond formed through nucleophilic attack by the 3 ' hydroxyl group of the oligonucleotide' s last nucleotide onto the 5' triphosphate of the next nucleotide. Nucleotides are incorporated one at a time into the oligonucleotide in a 5' to 3' direction. This process allows RNA to be produced and amplified from virtually any DNA or RNA templates.
  • nucleic acid Most natural polymerase enzymes incorporate standard nucleoside triphosphates into nucleic acid.
  • a DNA polymerase incorporates dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP into DNA and an RNA polymerase generally incorporates ATP, CTP, UTP, and GTP into RNA.
  • RNA polymerase generally incorporates ATP, CTP, UTP, and GTP into RNA.
  • certain polymerases that are capable of incorporating non-standard nucleoside triphosphates into nucleic acids (Joyce, 1997, PNAS 94, 1619- 1622, Huang et al., Biochemistry 36, 8231-8242).
  • nucleosides Before nucleosides can be incorporated into RNA transcripts using polymerase enzymes they must first be converted into nucleoside triphosphates which can be recognized by these enzymes. Phosphorylation of unblocked nucleosides by treatment with POCl 3 and trialkyi phosphates was shown to yield nucleoside 5'- phosphorodichloridates (Yoshikawa et al, 1969, Bull. Chem. Soc. (Japan) 42, 3505).
  • Adenosine or 2'-deoxyadenosine 5 '-triphosphate was synthesized by adding an additional step consisting of treatment with excess tri-n-butylammonium pyrophosphate in DMF followed by hydrolysis (Ludwig, 1981, Ada Biochim. et Biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16, 131-133).
  • Non-standard nucleoside triphosphates are not readily incorporated into RNA transcripts by traditional RNA polymerases. Mutations have been introduced into RNA polymerase to facilitate incorporation of deoxyribonucleotides into RNA (Sousa & Padilla, 1995, EMBO J. 14,4609-4621 , Bonner et al, 1992, EMBO J. 11, 3767-3775, Bonner et al., 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 42, 25120-25128, Aurup et al, 1992, Biochemistry 31, 9636-9641).
  • the article describes the use of the polymerase synthesized RNA for in vitro selection of aptamers to human neutrophil elastase (HNE).
  • HNE human neutrophil elastase
  • the invention features NTP's having the formula triphosphate-OR, for example the following formula I:
  • R is any nucleoside; specifically the nucleosides 2'-O-methyl-2,6-diaminopurine riboside; 2'-deoxy-2'amino-2,6-diaminopurine riboside; 2'-(N-alanyl) amino-2'-deoxy- uridine; 2'-(N-phenylalanyl)amino-2'-deoxy-uridine; 2'-deoxy -2'-(N- ⁇ -alanyl) amino ; 2'-deoxy-2'-(lysiyl) amino uridine; 2'-C-allyl uridine; 2'-O-amino-uridine; 2'-O- methylthiomethyl adenosine; 2'-O-methylthiomethyl cytidine ; 2'-O-methylthiomethyl guanosine; 2'-O-methylthiomethyl-uridine; 2'-Deoxy-2'-(N-histidyl) amino
  • the invention features a process for the synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotide triphosphate (such as UTP, 2'-O-MTM-UTP, dUTP and the like) including the steps of monophosphorylation where the pyrimidine nucleoside is contacted with a mixture having a phosphorylating agent (such as phosphorus oxychloride, phospho-tris- triazolides, phospho-tris-triimidazolides and the like), trialkyi phosphate (such as triethylphosphate or trimethylphosphate or the like) and dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) under conditions suitable for the formation of pyrimidine monophosphate; and pyrophosphorylation where the pyrimidine monophosphate is contacted with a pyrophosphorylating reagent (such as tributylammonium pyrophosphate) under conditions suitable for the formation of pyrimidine triphosphates.
  • a phosphorylating agent such as phosphorus oxychlor
  • nucleotide triphosphate or "NTP” is meant a nucleoside bound to three inorganic phosphate groups at the 5' hydroxyl group of the modified or unmodified ribose or deoxyribose sugar where the 1 ' position of the sugar may comprise a nucleic acid base or hydrogen.
  • the triphosphate portion may be modified to include chemical moieties which do not destroy the functionality of the group (i.e., allow incorporation into an RNA molecule).
  • nucleoside triphosphates (NTP's) of the instant invention are incorporated into an oligonucleotide using an RNA polymerase enzyme.
  • RNA polymerases include but are not limited to mutated and wild type versions of bacteriophage T7, SP6, or T3 RNA polymerases.
  • the invention features a process for incorporating modified NTP's into an oligonucleotide including the step of incubating a mixture having a DNA template, RNA polymerase, NTP, and an enhancer of modified
  • NTP incorporation under conditions suitable for the incorporation of the modified NTP into the oligonucleotide.
  • reagent of modified NTP incorporation is meant a reagent which facilitates the incorporation of modified nucleotides into a nucleic acid transcript by an RNA polymerase.
  • reagents include but are not limited to methanol; LiCl; polyethylene glycol (PEG); diethyl ether; propanol; methyl amine; ethanol and the like.
  • the modified nucleoside triphosphates can be incorporated by transcription into a nucleic acid molecules including enzymatic nucleic acid, antisense, 2-5A antisense chimera, oligonucleotides, triplex forming oligonucleotide (TFO), aptamers and the like (Stull et al, 1995 Pharmaceutical Res. 12, 465). 3o
  • antisense it is meant a non-nucleic acid catalyst that binds to target RNA by means of RNA-RNA or RNA-DNA or RNA-PNA (protein nucleic acid; Egholm et al,
  • 2-5A antisense chimera an antisense oligonucleotide containing a 5' phosphorylated 2'-5'-linked adenylate residues. These chimeras bind to target RNA in a sequence-specific manner and activate a cellular 2-5A-dependent ribonuclease which, in turn, cleaves the target RNA (Torrence et al, 1993 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 1300).
  • TFO triple forming oligonucleotides
  • oligonucleotide as used herein is meant a molecule having two or more nucleotides.
  • the polynucleotide can be single, double or multiple stranded and may have modified or unmodified nucleotides or non-nucleotides or various mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • the modified nucleoside triphosphates of the instant invention can be used for combinatorial chemistry or in vitro selection of nucleic acid molecules with novel function.
  • Modified oligonucleotides can be enzymatically synthesized to generate libraries for screening.
  • RNA modifications of bases and sugars have been discovered in a variety of naturally occurring RNA (e.g., tRNA, mRNA, rRNA; reviewed by Hall, 1971 77*e Modified Nucleosides in Nucleic Acids, Columbia University Press, New York; Limbach et al, 1994 Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2183).
  • tRNA, mRNA, rRNA reviewed by Hall, 1971 77*e Modified Nucleosides in Nucleic Acids, Columbia University Press, New York; Limbach et al, 1994 Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2183.
  • nucleosides synthesized nucleosides, nucleotides and phosphoramidites with various base and sugar modifications and incorporated them into oligonucleotides.
  • catalytic activity of the molecules described in the instant invention can be optimized as described by Draper et al., supra. The details will not be repeated here, but include altering the length of the ribozyme binding arms, or chemically synthesizing ribozymes with modifications (base, sugar and/or phosphate) that prevent their degradation by serum ribonucleases and/or enhance their enzymatic activity (see e.g., Eckstein et al, International Publication No. WO 92/07065; Perrault et al, 1990 N ⁇ twre 344, 565; Pieken et al., 1991 Science 253, 314; Usman and Cedergren, 1992 Trends in Biochem. Sci.
  • enhanced enzymatic activity is meant to include activity measured in cells and/or in vivo where the activity is a reflection of both catalytic activity and ribozyme stability. In this invention, the product of these properties is increased or not significantly (less that 10 fold) decreased in vivo compared to an all RNA ribozyme.
  • nucleic acid catalysts having chemical modifications which maintain or enhance enzymatic activity is provided.
  • Such nucleic acid is also generally more resistant to nucleases than unmodified nucleic acid.
  • the activity may not be significantly lowered.
  • ribozymes are useful in a cell and/or in vivo even if activity over all is reduced 10 fold (Burgin et al, 1996, Biochemistry, 35, 14090).
  • Such ribozymes herein are said to "maintain” the enzymatic activity on all RNA ribozyme.
  • the invention features a method of synthesizing ribozyme libraries of various sizes.
  • This invention describes methods to chemically synthesize ribozyme libraries of various sizes from suitable nucleoside analogs.
  • nucleotide building blocks In addition to structural considerations (hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, stacking properties, pucker orientation of sugars, hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of some subgroups constitutive of the nucleotides) that may lead to the selection of a specific nucleotide to be included in the design of a ribozyme library, one of the important features that needs to be considered when selecting nucleotide building blocks is the chemical compatibility of such building blocks with ribozyme synthesis.
  • a "nucleotide building block” is a nucleoside or nucleoside analog that possess a suitably protected phosphorus atom at the oxidation state V reacting readily, upon activation, to give a P v -containing intemucleoside linkage.
  • a suitable nucleoside building block may also contain a phosphorus atom at the oxidation state III reacting readily, upon activation, to give a P ⁇ -containing intemucleoside linkage that can be oxidized to the desired P v - containing intemucleoside linkage.
  • the phosphoramidite chemistry P ⁇
  • ribozyme libraries there are several other considerations while designing and synthesizing certain ribozyme libraries, such as: a) the coupling efficiencies of the nucleotide building blocks considered for a ribozyme library should not fall below 90% to provide a majority of full-length ribozyme; b) the nucleotide building blocks should be chemically stable to the selected synthesis and deprotection conditions of the particular ribozyme library; c) the deprotection schemes for the nucleotide building blocks incorporated into a ribozyme library, should be relatively similar and be fully compatible with ribozyme deprotection protocols.
  • nucleoside building blocks requiring extended deprotection or that cannot sustain harsh treatment should be avoided in the synthesis of a ribozyme library.
  • the reactivity of the nucleotide building blocks should be optimum when diluted to 100 mM to 200 mM in non-protic and relatively polar solvent.
  • the deprotection condition using 3:1 mixture of ethanol and concentrated aqueous ammonia at 65 degrees C. for 4 hours followed by a fluoride treatment as exemplified in Wincott et al. supra is particularly useful for ribozyme synthesis and is a preferred deprotection pathway for such nucleotide building blocks.
  • nucleotide building block mixing to generate ribozyme libraries. This method involves mixing various nucleotide building blocks together in proportions necessary to ensure equal representation of each of the nucleotide building blocks in the mixture. This mixture is incorporated into the ribozyme at position(s) selected for randomization.
  • the nucleotide building blocks selected for incorporation into a ribozyme library are typically mixed together in appropriate concentrations, in reagents, such as anhydrous acetonitrile, to form a mixture with a desired phosphoramidite concentration.
  • This approach for combinatorial synthesis of a ribozyme library with one or more random positions within the ribozyme (X as described above) is particularly useful since a standard DNA synthesizer can handle a building block mixture similar to a building block solution containing a single building block.
  • Such a nucleotide building block mixture is coupled to a solid support or to a growing ribozyme sequence attached to a solid-support.
  • the scale of the synthesis is increased substantially above that of the total complexity of the library.
  • a 2.5 ⁇ mole ribozyme synthesis provides ⁇ 3x10 17 ribozyme molecules corresponding to sub-nanomolar amounts of each member of a billion compounds ribozyme library.
  • Divinylbenzene highly cross-linked polystyrene solid-support constitutes the preferred stationary phase for ribozyme library synthesis.
  • solid-support systems utilized in DNA or RNA synthesis can also be used for ribozyme library synthesis.
  • This includes silica-based solid-supports such as controlled-pore glass (CPG) or polymeric solid-supports such as all types of derivatized polystyrene resins, grafted polymers of chloromethylated polystyrene crosslinked with ethyiene glycol, oligoethylene glycol.
  • CPG controlled-pore glass
  • polymeric solid-supports such as all types of derivatized polystyrene resins, grafted polymers of chloromethylated polystyrene crosslinked with ethyiene glycol, oligoethylene glycol.
  • a building block that presents a slow coupling kinetic will be over-represented in the mixture and vice versa for a building block that presents a fast coupling kinetic.
  • acceptable limits for unequal incorporation may generally be +/-10%.
  • Synthesis of a random ribozyme library can be performed either with the mixture of desired nucleotide building blocks, or with a combination of certain random positions (obtained by using one or more building block mixtures) and one or more fixed positions that can be introduced through the incorporation of a single nucleotide building block reagent.
  • the positions from 3 '-end 1 is fixed as 2'-deoxy-inverted abasic ribose (B), positions 2, 3, 8 and 9 have been fixed as 2'-deoxy-thymidine (T) while the X positions 4-7 correspond to an approximately equimolar distribution of all the nucleotide building blocks that make up the X mixture.
  • a "mix and split" approach to generate ribozyme libraries is described.
  • This method is particularly useful when the number of selected nucleotide building blocks to be included in the library is large and diverse (greater than 5 nucleotide building blocks) and/or when the coupling kinetics of the selected nucleotide building blocks do not allow competitive coupling even after relative concentration adjustments and optimization.
  • This method involves a multi-step process wherein the solid support used for ribozyme library synthesis is "split" (divided) into equal portions, (the number of portions is equal to the number of different nucleotide building blocks (n) chosen for incorporation at one or more random positions within the ribozyme).
  • the solid support is divided into 10 different portions. Each portion is independently coupled to one of the selected nucleotide building blocks followed by mixing of all the portions of solid support.
  • the ribozyme synthesis is then resumed as before the division of the building blocks.
  • the number of "splitting" and “mixing" steps is dependent on the number of positions that are random within the ribozyme. For example if three positions are desired to be random then three different splitting and mixing steps are necessary to synthesize the ribozyme library.
  • Random ribozyme libraries are synthesized using a non-competitive coupling procedure where each of the selected nucleotide analogs "n" separately couple to an inverse "n" (1/n) number of aliquots of solid-support or of a growing ribozyme chain on the solid-support.
  • a very convenient way to verify completeness of the coupling reaction is the use of a standard spectrophotometric DMT assay (Oligonucleotide Synthesis, A Practical Approach, ed. M. Gait, pp 48, IRC Press, Oxford, UK; incorporated by reference herein). These aliquots may be subsequently combined, mixed and split into one new aliquot.
  • a similar approach to making oligonucleotide libraries has recently been described by Cook et al, (US Patent No. 5,587,471) and is incorporated by reference herein.
  • nucleosides are dissolved in triethyl phosphate and chilled in an ice bath. Phosphorus oxychloride (POCl 3 ) is then added followed by the introduction of DMAP. The reaction is then warmed to room temperature and allowed to proceed for 5 hours. This reaction allows the formation of nucleoside monophosphates which can then be used in the formation of nucleoside triphosphates. Tributylamine is added followed by the addition of anhydrous acetonitrile and tributylammonium pyrophosphate.
  • reaction is then quenched with TEAB and stirred overnight at room temperature (about 20C).
  • TEAB Triphosphate
  • the triphosphate is purified using column purification and HPLC and the chemical structure is confirmed using NMR analysis.
  • Those skilled in the art will recognize that the reagents, temperatures of the reaction, and purification methods can easily be alternated with substitutes and equivalents and still obtain the desired product.
  • the invention provides nucleoside triphosphates which can be used for a number of different functions.
  • the nucleoside triphosphates formed from nucleosides found in table III are unique and distinct from other nucleoside triphosphates known in the art.
  • Incorporation of modified nucleotides into DNA or RNA oligonucleotides can alter the properties of the molecule. For example, modified nucleotides can hinder binding of nucleases, thus increasing the chemical half-life of the molecule. This is especially important if the molecule is to be used for cell culture or in vivo.
  • Modified nucleotides are incorporated using either wild type and mutant polymerases.
  • mutant T7 polymerase is used in the presence of modified nucleotide triphosphate(s), DNA template and suitable buffers.
  • Other polymerases and their respective mutant versions can also be utilized for the incorporation of NTP's of the invention.
  • Nucleic acid transcripts were detected by incorporating radiolabelled nucleotides ( ⁇ - 32 P NTP).
  • the radiolabeled NTP contained the same base as the modified triphosphate being tested.
  • the effects of methanol, PEG and LiCl were tested by adding these compounds independently or in combination.
  • Detection and quantitation of the nucleic acid transcripts was performed using a Molecular Dynamics Phosphorlmager. Efficiency of transcription was assessed by comparing modified nucleotide triphosphate incorporation with all-ribonucleotide incorporation control. Wild type polymerase was used to incorporate NTP's using the manufacturers buffers and instructions (Boehringer Mannheim). 4
  • Incorporation rates of modified nucleoside triphosphates into oligonucleotides can be increased by adding to traditional buffer conditions, several different enhancers of modified NTP incorporation.
  • Applicant has utilized methanol and LiCl in an attempt to increase incorporation rates of dNTP using RNA polymerase. These enhancers of modified NTP incorporation can be used in different combinations and ratios to optimize transcription. Optimal reaction conditions differ between nucleoside triphosphates and can readily be determined by standard experimentation. Overall however, inclusion of enhancers of modified NTP incorporation such as methanol or inorganic compound such as lithium chloride, have been shown by the applicant to increase the mean transcription rates.
  • nucleotide monophosphates, diphosphates, or triphosphates can be used as a therapeutic agent either independently or in combination with other pharmaceutical components.
  • These molecules of the inventions can be administered to patients using the methods of Sullivan et al, PCT WO 94/02595.
  • Molecules of the invention may be administered to cells by a variety of methods known to those familiar to the art, including, but not restricted to, encapsulation in liposomes, by iontophoresis, or by incorporation into other vehicles, such as hydrogels, cyclodextrins, biodegradable nanocapsules, and bioadhesive microspheres.
  • ribozymes may be directly delivered ex vivo to cells or tissues with or without the aforementioned vehicles.
  • the modified nucleotide triphosphate, diphosphate or monophosphate/vehicle combination is locally delivered by direct injection or by use of a catheter, infusion pump or stent.
  • Other routes of delivery include, but are not limited to, intravascular, intramuscular, subcutaneous or joint injection, aerosol inhalation, oral (tablet or pill form), topical, systemic, ocular, intraperitoneal and or intrathecal delivery. More detailed descriptions of delivery and administration are provided in Sullivan et al, supra and Draper et al, PCT WO93/23569 which have been incorporated by reference herein.
  • This invention further relates to a compound having the Formula II:
  • an "alkyl” group refers to a saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon, including straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic alkyl groups.
  • the alkyl group has 1 to 12 carbons. More preferably it is a lower alkyl of from 1 to 7 carbons, more preferably 1 to 4 carbons.
  • the alkyl group may be substituted or unsubstituted. When substituted the substituted group(s) is preferably, hydroxy, cyano, alkoxy, NO2 or N(CH 3 ) 2 , amino, or SH.
  • alkenyl group refers to unsaturated hydrocarbon groups containing at least one carbon-carbon double bond, including straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic groups.
  • the alkenyl group has 1 to 12 carbons. More preferably it is a lower alkenyl of from 1 to 7 carbons, more preferably 1 to 4 carbons.
  • the alkenyl group may be substituted or unsubstituted. When substituted the substituted group(s) is preferably, hydroxyl, cyano, alkoxy, NO 2 , halogen, N(CH 3 )2, amino, or SH.
  • alkynyl refers to an unsaturated hydrocarbon group containing at least one carbon-carbon triple bond, including straight-chain, branched-chain, and cyclic groups.
  • the alkynyl group has 1 to 12 carbons. More preferably it is a lower alkynyl of from 1 to 7 carbons, more preferably 1 to 4 carbons.
  • aryl group refers to an aromatic group which has at least one ring having a conjugated p electron system and includes carbocyclic aryl, heterocyclic aryl and biaryl groups, all of which may be optionally substituted.
  • the preferred substituent(s) on aryl groups are halogen, trihalomethyl, hydroxyl, SH, cyano, alkoxy, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, and amino groups.
  • alkylaryl refers to an alkyl group (as described above) covalently joined to an aryl group (as described above).
  • Carbocyclic aryl groups are groups wherein the ring atoms on the aromatic ring are all carbon atoms. The carbon atoms are optionally substituted.
  • Heterocyclic aryl groups are groups having from 1 to 3 heteroatoms as ring atoms in the aromatic ring and the remainder of the ring atoms are carbon atoms. Suitable heteroatoms include oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, and include furanyl, thienyl, pyridyl, pyrrolyl, pyrrolo, pyrimidyl, pyrazinyl, imidazolyl and the like, all optionally substituted.
  • amide refers to an -C(O)-NH-R, where R is either alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl or hydrogen.
  • ester refers to an -C(O)-OR', where R is either alkyl, aryl, or alkylaryl.
  • a “blocking group” is a group which is able to be removed after polynucleotide synthesis and/or which is compatible with solid phase polynucleotide synthesis.
  • a "phosphorus containing group” can include phosphorus in forms such as dithioates, phosphoramidites and/or as part of an oligonucleotide.
  • the invention features a process for synthesis of the compounds of formula II.
  • the invention features a process for the synthesis of a xylofuranosyl nucleoside phosphoramidite comprising the steps of: a) oxidation of a 2' and 5 '-protected ribonucleoside with a an oxidant such as chromium oxide/pyridine/aceticanhydride, dimethylsulfoxide/aceticanhydride, or Dess-Martin reagent (periodinane) followed by reduction with a reducing agent such as, triacetoxy sodium borohydride, sodium borohydride, or lithium borohydride, under conditions suitable for the formation of 2' and 5'-protected xylofuranosyl nucleoside; b) phosphitylation under conditions suitable for the formation of xylofuranosyl nucleoside phosphoramidite.
  • a an oxidant such as chromium oxide/pyridine/aceticanhydride, dimethylsulfoxide/aceticanhydride,
  • the invention features the incorporation of the compounds of Formula II into polynucleotides.
  • These compounds can be incorporated into polynucleotides enzymatically.
  • these novel nucleotide analogs can be incorporated into RNA at one or more positions (Milligan et al, 1989, Methods Enzymol, 180, 51).
  • novel nucleoside analogs can be incorporated into polynucleotides using solid phase synthesis (Brown and Brown, 1991, in Oligonucleotides and Analogues: A Practical Approach, p. 1, ed. F.
  • the compounds of Formula II can be used for chemical synthesis of nucleotide- tri-phosphates and/or phosphoramidites as building blocks for selective incorporation into oligonucleotides.
  • These oligonucleotides can be used as an antisense molecule, 2-5A antisense chimera, triplex forming oligonucleotides (TFO) or as an nucleic acid catalyst.
  • TFO triplex forming oligonucleotides
  • the oligonucleotides can also be used as probes or primers for synthesis and/or sequencing of RNA or DNA.
  • the compounds of the instant invention can be readily converted into nucleotide diphosphate and nucleotide triphosphates using standard protocols (for a review see Hutchinson, 1991, in Chemistty of Nucleosides and Nucleotides, v.2, pp 81-160, Ed. L. B. Townsend, Plenum Press, New York, USA; incorporated by reference herein).
  • the compounds of Formula II can also be independently or in combination used as an antiviral, anticancer or an antitumor agent. These compounds can also be independently or in combination used with other antiviral, anticancer or an antitumor agents.
  • the nucleic acid catalyst is formed in a hammerhead or hairpin motif, but may also be formed in the motif of a hepatitis d vims, group I intron, group II intron or RNaseP RNA (in association with an RNA guide sequence) or Neurospora VS RNA.
  • introns are described by Griffin et al, 1995, Chem. Biol. 2, 761; Michels and Pyle, 1995, Biochemistry 34, 2965; Pyle et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/22689; and of the Group I intron by Cech et al, U.S. Patent 4,987,071. These specific motifs are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in a nucleic acid catalyst of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site which is complementary to one or more of the target gene RNA regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart an RNA cleaving activity to the molecule.
  • a polynucleotide of the invention would bear one or more 2'-hydroxylamino functionalities attached directly to the monomeric unit or through the use of an appropriate spacer. Since oligonucleotides have neither aldehyde nor hydroxylamino groups, the formation of an oxime would occur selectively using oligo as a polymeric template. This approach would facilitate the attachment of practically any molecule of interest (peptides, polyamines, coenzymes, oligosaccharides, lipids, etc.) directly to the oligonucleotide using either aldehyde or carboxylic function in the molecule of interest.
  • aminooxy "tether" in oligonucleotides such as a ribozyme
  • carboxylic groups e.g., aminoacids, peptides, "cap” stmctures ,etc.
  • Target Discovery Applicant has developed an efficient and rapid method for screening libraries of catalytic nucleic acid molecules capable of performing a desired function in a cell.
  • the invention also features the use of a catalytic nucleic acid library to modulate certain attributes or processes in a biological system, such as a mammalian cell, and to identify and isolate a) nucleic acid catalysts from the library involved in modulating the cellular process/attribute of interest; and b) modulators of the desired cellular process/attribute using the sequence of the nucleic acid catalyst.
  • the method of the instant invention involves designing and constmcting a catalytic nucleic acid library, where the catalytic nucleic acid includes a catalytic and a substrate binding domain, and the substrate binding domain (arms) are randomized.
  • This library of catalytic nucleic acid molecules with randomized binding arm(s) are used to modulate certain processes/attributes in a biological system.
  • the method described in this application involves simultaneous screening of a library or pool of catalytic nucleic acid molecules with various substitutions at one or more positions and selecting for ribozymes with desired function or characteristics or attributes.
  • This invention also features a method for constmcting and selecting for catalytic nucleic acid molecules for their ability to cleave a given target nucleic acid molecule or an unknown target nucleic acid molecule (e.g., RNA), and to inhibit the biological function of that target molecule or any protein encoded by it.
  • a given target nucleic acid molecule or an unknown target nucleic acid molecule e.g., RNA
  • the cell-based screening protocol described in the instant invention offers many advantages over extracellular systems, because the synthesis of large quantities of RNA by enzymatic or chemical methods prior to assessing the efficacy of the catalytic nucleic acid molecules is not necessary.
  • the invention further describes a rapid method of using catalytic nucleic acid molecule libraries to identify the biological function of a gene sequence inside a cell.
  • Applicant describes a method of using catalytic nucleic acid molecule libraries to identify a nucleic acid molecule, such as a gene, involved in a biological process; this nucleic acid molecule may be a known molecule with a known function, or a known molecule with a previously undefined function or an entirely novel molecule.
  • This is a rapid means for identifying, for example, genes involved in a cellular pathway, such as cell proliferation, cell migration, cell death, and others.
  • This method of gene discovery is not only a novel approach to studying a desired biological process but also a means to identify active reagents that can modulate this cellular process in a precise manner.
  • Applicant describes herein, a general approach for simultaneously assaying the ability of one or more members of a catalytic nucleic acid molecule library to modulate certain attributes/process(es) in a biological system, such as plants, animals or bacteria, involving introduction of the library into a desired cell and assaying for changes in a specific "attribute,” "characteristic” or “process.”
  • the specific attributes may include cell proliferation, cell survival, cell death, cell migration, angiogenesis, tumor volume, tumor metastasis, levels of a specific mRNA(s) in a cell, levels of a specific protein(s) in a cell, levels of a specific protein secreted, cell surface markers, cell morphology, cell differentiation pattern, cartilage degradation, transplantation, restenosis, viral replication, viral load, and the like.
  • the invention involves synthesizing a Random Binding Arm Nucleic Acid Catalyst Library (Random Library) and simultaneously testing all members of the Random Library in cells.
  • This library has ribozymes with random substrate binding arm(s) and a defined catalytic domain.
  • Cells with an altered attribute (such as inhibition of cell proliferation) as a result of interaction with the members of the Random Library are selected and the sequences of the ribozymes from these cells are determined.
  • Sequence information from the binding arm(s) of these ribozymes can be used to isolate nucleic acid molecules that are likely to be involved in the pathway responsible for the desired cellular attribute using standard technology known in the art, e.g., nucleic acid amplification using techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This method is a powerful means to isolate new genes or genes with new function.
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • Random Library as used herein is meant ribozyme libraries comprising all possible variants in the binding arm (s) of a given ribozyme motif.
  • the Random Library is expected to comprise sequences complementary to every potential target sequence, for the ribozyme motif chosen, in the genome of an organism.
  • This Random Library can be used to screen for ribozyme cleavage sites in a known target sequence or in a unknown target.
  • the Random Library is introduced into the cell of choice and the expression of the known target gene is assayed. Cells with an altered expression of the target will yield the most effective ribozyme against the known target.
  • the Random Library is introduced into the cell of choice and the cells are assayed for a specific attribute, for example, survival of cells.
  • Cells that survive the interaction with the Random Library are isolated and the ribozyme sequence from these cells is determined.
  • the sequence of the binding arm of the ribozyme can then be used as probes to isolate the gene(s) involved in cell death.
  • the ribozyme(s) from the Random Library is able to modulate (e.g., down regulate) the expression of the gene(s) involved in cell death, the cells are able to survive under conditions where they would have otherwise died.
  • This is a novel method of gene discovery. This approach not only provides the information about mediators of certain cellular processes, but also provides a means to modulate the JO
  • This method can be used to identify modulators of any cell process in any organism, including but not limited to mammals, plants and bacteria.
  • the invention provides a method for producing a class of enzymatic cleaving agents which exhibit a high degree of specificity for the nucleic acid sequence of a desired target.
  • the nucleic acid catalyst is preferably targeted to a highly conserved sequence region of a target such that specific diagnosis and/or treatment of a disease or condition can be provided with a single enzymatic nucleic acid.
  • the invention features a method for identifying one or more nucleic acid molecules, such as gene(s), involved in a process (such as, cell growth, proliferation, apoptosis, mo ⁇ hology, angiogenesis, differentiation, migration, viral multiplication, dmg resistance, signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, temperature sensitivity, chemical sensitivity and others) in a biological system, such as a cell.
  • a process such as, cell growth, proliferation, apoptosis, mo ⁇ hology, angiogenesis, differentiation, migration, viral multiplication, dmg resistance, signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, temperature sensitivity, chemical sensitivity and others
  • the method involves the steps of: a) providing a random library of nucleic acid catalysts, with a substrate binding domain and a catalytic domain, where the substrate binding domain has a random sequence, to the biological system under conditions suitable for the process to be altered; b) identifying any nucleic acid catalyst present in that biological system where the process has been altered by any nucleic acid catalyst; and c) determining the nucleotide sequence of at least a portion of the binding arm of such a nucleic acid catalyst to allow identification of the nucleic acid molecule involved in the process in that biological system.
  • the invention features a method for identification of a nucleic acid molecule capable of modulating a process in a biological system.
  • the method includes: a) introducing a library of nucleic acid catalysts with a substrate binding domain and a catalytic domain, where the substrate binding domain has a random sequence, into the biological system under conditions suitable for modulating the process; and b) determining the nucleotide sequence of at least a portion of the substrate binding domain of any nucleic acid catalyst from a biological system where the process has been modulated to allow said identification of the nucleic acid molecule capable of modulating said process in that biological system.
  • the invention further concerns a method for identification of a nucleic acid catalyst capable of modulating a process in a biological system. This involves: a) introducing a library of nucleic acid catalysts with a substrate binding domain and a catalytic domain, where the substrate binding domain has a random sequence, into the biological system under conditions suitable for modulating the process; and b) identifying any nucleic acid catalyst from a biological system where the process has been modulated.
  • enzyme portion or “catalytic domain” is meant that portion/region of the ribozyme essential for cleavage of a nucleic acid substrate (for example see Figure 3).
  • nucleic acid molecule as used herein is meant a molecule having nucleotides.
  • the nucleic acid can be single, double or multiple stranded and may comprise modified or unmodified nucleotides or non-nucleotides or various mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • An example of a nucleic acid molecule according to the invention is a gene which encodes for macromolecule such as a protein.
  • the "biological system” as used herein may be a eukaryotic system or a prokaryotic system, may be a bacterial cell, plant cell or a mammalian cell, or may be of plant origin, mammalian origin, yeast origin, Drosophila origin, or archebacterial origin.
  • This invention further relates to novel nucleic acid molecules with catalytic activity, which are particularly useful for cleavage of RNA or DNA.
  • the nucleic acid catalysts of the instant invention are distinct from other nucleic acid catalysts known in the art.
  • This invention also relates to a method of screening variants of nucleic acid catalysts using standard nucleotides or modified nucleotides. Applicant has determined an efficient method for screening libraries of catalytic nucleic acid molecules, particularly those with chemical modifications at one or more positions. The method described in this application involves systematic screening of a library or pool of ribozymes with various substitutions at one or more positions and selecting for ribozymes with desired function or characteristic or attribute.
  • a method for identifying a nucleic acid molecule involved in a process in a cell including the steps of: a) synthesizing a library of nucleic acid catalysts, having a substrate binding domain and a catalytic domain, where the substrate binding domain has a random sequence; b) testing the library in the cell under conditions suitable to cause the process in the cell to be altered (such as: inhibition of cell proliferation, inhibition of angiogenesis, modulation of growth and /or differentiation, and others); c) isolating and enriching the cell with the altered process; d) identifying and isolating the nucleic acid catalyst in the altered cell; e) using an oligonucleotide, having the sequence homologous to the sequence of the substrate binding domain of the nucleic acid catalyst isolated from the altered cell, as a probe to isolate the nucleic acid molecule from the cell or the altered cell.
  • nucleic acid molecules identified using the selection/screening method described above are likely to be involved in the process that was being assayed for alteration by the member(s) of the ribozyme library.
  • These nucleic acid molecules may be new gene sequences, or known gene sequences, with a novel function.
  • nucleic acid sequences, such as genes, involved in a biological process such as differentiation, cell growth, disease processes including cancer, tumor angiogenesis, arthritis, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, restenosis, vascular disease and the like, can be readily identified using the Random Library approach.
  • one Random Library for a given ribozyme motif can be used to assay any process in any biological system.
  • the invention involves synthesizing a Defined Arm Nucleic Acid Catalyst Library (Defined Library) and simultaneously testing it against known targets in a cell.
  • the library includes ribozymes with binding arm(s) of known complexity (Defined) and a defined catalytic domain. Modulation of expression of the target gene by ribozymes in the library will cause the cells to have an altered phenotype. Such cells are isolated and the ribozymes in these cells are the ones most suited for modulating the expression of the desired gene in the cell.
  • Defined Library is meant a library of nucleic acid catalysts, wherein each member nucleic acid catalyst is designed and produced independently, then added to the library.
  • the content, complexity (number of different ribozymes contained in the library) and ratios of library members are defined at the outset.
  • Defined Library comprises > 2 ribozymes. The process involves screening the sequence of the known target RNA for all possible sites that can be cleaved by a given ribozyme motif and as described, for example in McSwiggen, US Patent No. 5,525,468, inco ⁇ orated by reference herein. Synthesizing a representative number of different ribozymes aginst the target sequence. Combining the ribozymes and introducing the pooled ribozymes into a biological system comprising the target RNA under conditions suitable to facilitate modulation of the expression of the target RNA in said biological system.
  • Applicant describes herein, a general combinatorial approach for assaying ribozyme variants based on ribozyme activity and/or a specific "attribute" of a ribozyme, such as the cleavage rate, cellular efficacy, stability, delivery, localization and the like. Variations of this approach also offer the potential for designing novel catalytic oligonucleotides, identifying ribozyme accessible sites within a target, and for identifying new nucleic acid targets for ribozyme-mediated modulation of gene expression.
  • the method relies upon testing mixtures (libraries) of ribozymes with various nucleotides, nucleotide analogs, or other analog substitutions, rather than individual ribozymes, to rapidly identify the nucleotide, nucleotide analog, or other analog that is variable at one or more positions within a ribozyme.
  • a desired number of positions for example, 3 positions as shown in Figure 2 are chosen for variation in a first ribozyme motif (Starting Ribozyme); there is no requirement on the number of positions that can be varied and these positions may or may not be phylogenetically conserved for the ribozyme.
  • step 2 ribozyme pools are synthesized containing a random mixture of different nucleotides, nucleotide analogs, or other analogs at all of the desired positions (designated "X") to be varied except one, which is the "fixed” position (designated "F”).
  • the fixed position contains a specific nucleotide, nucleotide analog or other analog.
  • nucleotides, or analogs there is no requirement for the number of nucleotides, or analogs be used.
  • step 3 the different pools of ribozymes are tested for desired activity, phenotype, characteristic or attribute.
  • the testing may be determining in vitro rates of target nucleic acid cleavage for each pool, testing ribozyme-substrate binding affinities, testing nuclease resistance, determining pharmacodynamic properties, or determining which pool is most efficacious in a cellular or animal model system.
  • Desired Variant- 1 a desired variant
  • Z the nucleotide or the analog present at the fixed position within the Desired Variant- 1
  • Z constant
  • a single position within a ribozyme is therefore varied, i.e., the variable nucleotide or analog at a single position, when all other X positions are random, is identified within a ribozyme motif.
  • new ribozyme pools (Classes 2, 3 etc.) are synthesized containing an equal mixture of all nucleotides or analogs at the remaining positions to be optimized except one fixed position and one or more constant positions.
  • a specific nucleotide or analog is "fixed” at a single position that is not randomized and the pools are assayed for a -,
  • step 4 This process is repeated until all desired positions have been varied and screened. For example if three positions are chosen for optimization, the synthesis and testing will need to be repeated three times (3 Classes). In the first two Classes, pools will be synthesized; in the final Class, specific ribozymes will be synthesized and tested. When the final position is analyzed (step 5), no random positions will remain and therefore only individual ribozymes are synthesized and tested. The resulting ribozyme or ribozymes (designated "second ribozyme motif) will have a defined chemical composition which will likely be distinct from the Starting Ribozyme motif (first ribozyme motif). This is a rapid method of screening for variability of one or more positions within a ribozyme motif.
  • the invention involves screening of chemical modifications at one or more positions within a hammerhead ribozyme motif. More specifically, the invention involves variability in the catalytic core sequence of a hammerhead ribozyme. Particularly, the invention describes screening for variability of positions 3, 4 and 7 within a hammerhead ribozyme. The invention also features screening for optimal loop II sequence in a hammerhead ribozyme.
  • the invention features a rapid method for screening accessible ribozyme cleavage sites within a target sequence.
  • This method involves screening of all possible sequences in the binding arm of a ribozyme.
  • the sequence of the binding arms determines the site of action of certain ribozymes.
  • the combinatorial approach can be used to identify desirable and/or accessible sites within a target sequence by essentially testing all possible arm sequences.
  • the difficulty with this approach is that ribozymes require a certain number of base pairs (for example, for hammerhead ribozymes the binding arm length is approximately 12-16 nucleotides) in order to bind functionally and sequence-specifically.
  • Each pool would contain the four different nucleotides (A, C, U and G) or nucleotide -
  • the number of pools within a Class equals the number of nucleotides or analogs in the random mixture (i.e., n) to the w power, where w equals the number of positions fixed in each Class.
  • the number of Classes that need to be synthesized to optimize the final ribozyme equals the total number of positions to be optimized divided by the number of positions (w) tested within each Class.
  • the number of pools in each Class n .
  • the number of Class total number of positions ⁇ v.
  • the invention features a rapid method of screening for new catalytic nucleic acid motifs by keeping the binding arms constant and varying one or more positions in a putative catalytic domain.
  • Applicant describes a method to vary positions within the catalytic domain, without changing positions within the binding arms, in order to identify new catalytic motifs.
  • An example is illustrated in Figure 24. It is unclear how many positions are required to obtain a functional catalytic domain in a nucleic acid molecule, however it is reasonable to presume that if a large number of functionally diverse nucleotide analogs can be used to constmct the pools, a relatively small number of positions could constitute a functional catalytic domain.
  • ribozyme libraries (Class 1) are constmcted: position 1 is fixed (F,) and positions 2, 3 and 4 are random (X 2 , X 3 and X 4 , respectively).
  • the pools (the number of pools tested depends on the number of analogs used; n) are assayed for activity. This testing may be performed in vitro or in a cellular or animal model.
  • Every position has been made constant and the chemical composition of the catalytic domain is determined. If the number of positions in the catalytic domain to be varied are large, then it is possible to decrease the number of Classes by testing multiple positions within a single Class.
  • the number of pools within a Class equals the number of nucleotides or analogs in the random mixture (i.e., n) to the w power, where w equals the number of positions fixed in each Class.
  • the number of Classes that need to be synthesized to optimize the final ribozyme equals the total number of positions to be optimized divided by the number of positions (w) tested within each Class.
  • the number of pools in each Class n w .
  • a method for identifying variants of a nucleic acid catalyst comprising the steps of: a) selecting at least three (3) positions, preferably 3-12, specifically 4-10, within said nucleic acid catalyst to be varied with a predetermined group of different nucleotides, these nucleotides are modified or unmodified (non-limiting examples of nucleotides that can used in this method are shown in Figure 15); b) synthesizing a first class of different pools of said nucleic acid catalyst, wherein the number of pools synthesized is equal to the number of nucleotides in the predetermined group of different nucleotides (for example if 10 different nucleotides are selected to be in the group of predetermined nucleotides then 10 different pools of nucleic acid catalysts have to be synthesized), wherein at least one of the positions to be varied in each pool comprises a defined nucleotide (fixed position; F) selected from the predetermined group of different nucleotides and the remaining positions to be
  • a method for identifying novel nucleic acid molecules in a biological system comprising the steps of: a) synthesizing a pool of nucleic acid catalyst with a substrate binding domain and a catalytic domain, wherein said substrate binding domain comprises a random sequence; b) testing the pools of nucleic acid catalyst under conditions suitable for showing a desired effect (such as inhibition of cell proliferation, inhibition of angiogenesis, modulation of growth and /or differentiation, and others) and identifying the catalyst with said desired attribute; c) using an oligonucleotide, comprising the sequence of the substrate binding domain of the nucleic acid catalyst showing said desired effect, as a probe, screening said biological system for nucleic acid molecules complementary to said probe ; and d) isolating and sequencing said complementary nucleic acid molecules.
  • a desired effect such as inhibition of cell proliferation, inhibition of angiogenesis, modulation of growth and /or differentiation, and others
  • nucleic acid molecules identified using a nucleic acid screening method described above may be new gene sequences, or known gene sequences.
  • the advantage of this method is that nucleic acid sequences, such as genes, involved in a biological process, such as differentiation, cell growth, disease processes including cancer, tumor angiogenesis, arthritis, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, restenosis, vascular disease and the like, can be readily identified.
  • the invention features a nucleic acid molecule with catalytic activity having one of the formulae III- VII:
  • N represents independently a nucleotide or a non- nucleotide linker, which may be same or different;
  • M and Q are independently oligonucleotides of length sufficient to stably interact (e.g., by forming hydrogen bonds with complementary nucleotides in the target) with a target nucleic acid molecule (the target can be an RNA, DNA or RNA/DNA mixed polymers); preferably the length of Q is greater than or equal to 3 nucleotides and the length of M is preferably greater than or equal to 5 nucleotides; o and n are integers greater than or equal to 1 and preferably less than about 100, wherein if (N) 0 and (N) n are nucleotides, (N)o and (N)n are optionally able to interact by hydrogen bond interaction;
  • L is a linker which may be present or absent (i.e., the molecule is assembled from two separate molecules), but when present, is a nucleotide and/
  • 2'-O-MTM-U and 2'-O-MTM-C refers to 2'-O-methylthiomethyl uridine and 2'-O-methylthiomethyl-cytidine, respectively.
  • A, C, U and G represent adenosine, cytidine, uridine and guanosine nucleotides, respectively.
  • the nucleotides in the formulae are unmodified or modified at the sugar, base, and/or phosphate portions as known in the art. oo
  • the nucleotide linker (L) is a nucleic acid aptamer, such as an ATP aptamer, HIV Rev aptamer (RRE), HIV Tat aptamer (TAR) and others (for a review see Gold et al, 1995, Ann . Rev. Biochem., 64, 763; and Szostak & Ellington, 1993, in The RNA World, ed. Gesteland and Atkins, pp 511, CSH Laboratory Press).
  • RRE HIV Rev aptamer
  • TAR HIV Tat aptamer
  • a "nucleic acid aptamer” as used herein is meant to indicate nucleic acid sequence capable of interacting with a ligand.
  • the ligand can be any natural or a synthetic molecule, including but not limited to a resin, metabolites, nucleosides, nucleotides, dmgs, toxins, transition state analogs, peptides, lipids, proteins, aminoacids, nucleic acid molecules, hormones, carbohydrates, receptors, cells, viruses, bacteria and others.
  • non-nucleotide linker (L) is as defined herein.
  • the invention features modified ribozymes having a base substitution selected from pyridin-4-one, pyridin-2-one, phenyl, pseudouracil, 2, 4, 6-trimethoxy benzene, 3-methyluracil, dihydrouracil, naphthyl, 6-methyl-uracil and aminophenyl.
  • non-nucleotide linker (L) is as defined herein.
  • non-nucleotide include either abasic nucleotide, polyether, polyamine, polyamide, peptide, carbohydrate, lipid, or polyhydrocarbon compounds. Specific examples include those described by Seela and Kaiser, Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 75:6353 and Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 75:3113; Cload and Schepartz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 773:6324; Richardson and Schepartz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 773:5109; Ma et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 27:2585 and Biochemistry 1993, 32:1751; Durand et al., Nucleic Acids Res.
  • the invention features a nucleic acid catalyst having one or more non-nucleotide moieties, and having enzymatic -._
  • non-nucleotide any group or compound which can be inco ⁇ orated into a nucleic acid chain in the place of one or more nucleotide units, including either sugar and/or phosphate substitutions, and allows the remaining bases to exhibit their enzymatic activity.
  • the group or compound is abasic in that it does not contain a commonly recognized nucleotide base, such as adenosine, guanine, cytosine, uracil or thymine.
  • abasic or “abasic nucleotide” as used herein encompass sugar moieties lacking a base or having other chemical groups in place of base at the 1' position.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid includes one or more stretches of RNA, which provide the enzymatic activity of the molecule, linked to the non-nucleotide moiety.
  • RNA Ribonucleic acid
  • RNA is meant a molecule comprising at least one ribonucleotide residue.
  • non-nucleotide-containing enzymatic nucleic acid means a nucleic acid molecule that contains at least one non-nucleotide component which replaces a portion of a ribozyme, e.g., but not limited to, a double- stranded stem, a single-stranded "catalytic core” sequence, a single-stranded loop or a single-stranded recognition sequence.
  • These molecules are able to cleave (preferably, repeatedly cleave) separate RNA or DNA molecules in a nucleotide base sequence specific manner. Such molecules can also act to cleave intramolecularly if that is desired.
  • Such enzymatic molecules can be targeted to virtually any RNA transcript.
  • nucleic acid catalysts described in the instant application are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in a nucleic acid catalyst of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site (e.g., M and/or Q of Formulae III- VII above) which is complementary to one or more of the target nucleic acid regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart a nucleic acid cleaving activity to the molecule.
  • substrate binding site e.g., M and/or Q of Formulae III- VII above
  • nucleic acid catalysts of the instant invention can be expressed within cells from eukaryotic promoters (e.g., Izant and Weintraub, 1985 Science 229, 345; McGarry and Lindquist, 1986 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 83, 399; Scanlon et al, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10591-5; Kashani-Sabet et al, 1992 Antisense Res. Dev., 2, 3-15; Dropulic et al, 1992 J. Virol, 66, 1432-41; Weerasinghe et al, 1991 J.
  • eukaryotic promoters e.g., Izant and Weintraub, 1985 Science 229, 345; McGarry and Lindquist, 1986 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 83, 399; Scanlon et al, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad.
  • nucleic acids can be augmented by their release from the primary transcript by a ribozyme (Draper et al, PCT WO 93/23569, and Sullivan et al, PCT WO 94/02595; Ohkawa et al, 1992 Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 27, 15-6; Taira et al, 1991, Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 5125-30; Ventura et al, 1993 Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3249-55; Chowrira et al, 1994 J. Biol Chem. 269, 25856; all of the references are hereby inco ⁇ orated in their totality by reference herein).
  • a ribozyme Draper et al, PCT WO 93/23569, and Sullivan et al, PCT 94/02595; Ohkawa et al, 1992 Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 27, 15-6; Taira et al, 1991
  • nucleic acid catalysts that cleave target molecules are expressed from transcription units (see for example Figure 11) inserted into DNA or RNA vectors.
  • the recombinant vectors are preferably DNA plasmids or viral vectors. Ribozyme expressing viral vectors could be constmcted based on, but not limited to, adeno-associated vims, retrovims, adenovims, or alphavims.
  • the recombinant vectors capable of expressing the ribozymes are delivered as described above, and persist in target cells.
  • viral vectors may be used that provide for transient expression of ribozymes. Such vectors might be repeatedly administered as necessary.
  • the ribozymes cleave the target mRNA.
  • the active ribozyme contains an enzymatic center or core equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind target nucleic acid molecules such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such cleavage. Delivery of ribozyme expressing vectors could be systemic, such as by intravenous or intramuscular administration, by administration to target cells ex-planted from the patient followed by reintroduction into the patient, or by any other means that would allow for introduction into the desired target cell (for a review see Couture and Stinchcomb, 1996, TIG., 12, 510).
  • an expression vector comprising nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one of the nucleic acid catalyst of the instant invention.
  • the nucleic acid sequence encoding the nucleic acid catalyst of the instant invention is operable linked in a manner which allows expression of that nucleic acid molecule.
  • the expression vector comprises: a transcription initiation region (e.g., eukaryotic pol I, II or III initiation region); b) a transcription termination region (e.g., eukaryotic pol I, II or III termination region); c) a gene encoding at least one of the nucleic acid catalyst of the instant invention; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said nucleic acid molecule.
  • the vector may optionally include an open reading frame (ORF) for a protein operably linked on the 5' side or the 3'- side of the gene encoding the nucleic acid catalyst of the invention; and/or an intron (intervening sequences).
  • ORF open reading frame
  • RNA polymerase I (pol I), RNA polymerase II (pol II), or RNA polymerase III (pol III).
  • Transcripts from pol II or pol III promoters will be expressed at high levels in all cells; the levels of a given pol II promoter in a given cell type will depend on the nature of the gene regulatory sequences (enhancers, silencers, etc.) present nearby.
  • Prokaryotic RNA polymerase promoters are also used, providing that the prokaryotic RNA polymerase enzyme is expressed in the appropriate cells (Elroy-Stein and Moss, 1990 Proc. Natl.
  • transcription units such as the ones derived from genes encoding U6 small nuclear (snRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA) and adenovims VA RNA are useful in generating high concentrations of desired RNA molecules such as ribozymes in cells (Thompson et al, supra; Couture and Stinchcomb, 1996, supra; Noonberg et al, 1994, Nucleic Acid Res., 22, 2830; Noonberg et al, US Patent No. 5,624,803; Good et al, 1997, Gene Ther. 4, 45; Beigelman et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/18736; all of these publications are inco ⁇ orated by reference herein.
  • transcription units suitable for expression of ribozymes of the instant invention are shown in Figure 11.
  • the above ribozyme transcription units can be inco ⁇ orated into a variety of vectors for introduction into mammalian cells, including but not restricted to, plasmid DNA vectors, viral DNA vectors (such as adenovims or adeno-associated vims vectors), or viral RNA vectors (such as retroviral or alphavims vectors) (for a review see Couture and Stinchcomb, 1996, supra).
  • an expression vector comprising nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one of the catalytic nucleic acid molecule of the invention, in a manner which allows expression of that nucleic acid molecule.
  • the expression vector comprises in one embodiment; a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) a gene encoding at least one said nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said nucleic acid molecule.
  • the expression vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an open reading frame; d) a gene encoding at least one said nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3'-end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said nucleic acid molecule.
  • the expression vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) a gene encoding at least one said nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said nucleic acid molecule.
  • the expression vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) an open reading frame; e) a gene encoding at least one said nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3'-end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said nucleic acid molecule.
  • the nucleic acid catalysts are added directly, or can be complexed with cationic lipids, packaged within liposomes, or otherwise delivered to smooth muscle cells.
  • the RNA or RNA complexes can be locally administered to relevant tissues through the use of a catheter, infusion pump or stent, with or without their inco ⁇ oration in biopolymers.
  • other nucleic acid catalysts that cleave target nucleic acid may be derived and used as described above. Specific examples of nucleic acid catalysts of the instant invention are provided below in the Tables and figures.
  • Ribozymes may be administered to cells by a variety of methods known to those familiar to the art, including, but not restricted to, encapsulation in liposomes, by iontophoresis, or by inco ⁇ oration into other vehicles, such as hydrogels, cyclodextrins, biodegradable nanocapsules, and bioadhesive microspheres.
  • ribozymes may be directly delivered ex vivo to cells or tissues with or without the aforementioned vehicles.
  • the RNA/vehicle combination is locally delivered by direct injection or by use of a catheter, infusion pump or stent.
  • routes of delivery include, but are not limited to, intravascular, intramuscular, subcutaneous or joint injection, aerosol inhalation, oral (tablet or pill form), topical, systemic, ocular, intraperitoneal and or intrathecal delivery. More detailed descriptions of ribozyme delivery and administration are provided in Sullivan et al, supra and Draper et al, supra which have been inco ⁇ orated by reference herein.
  • the present invention also includes pharmaceutically acceptable formulations of the compounds described. These formulations include salts of the above compounds, e.g., ammonium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, lithium, and potassium salts.
  • a pharmacological composition or formulation refers to a composition or formulation in a form suitable for administration, e.g., systemic administration, into a cell or patient, preferably a human. Suitable forms, in part, depend upon the use or the route of entry, for example oral, transdermal, or by injection. Such forms should not prevent the composition or formulation to reach a target cell (i.e., a cell to which the negatively charged polymer is desired to be delivered to). For example, pharmacological compositions injected into the blood stream should be soluble. Other factors are known in the art, and include considerations such as toxicity and forms which prevent the composition or formulation from exerting its effect.
  • systemic administration in vivo systemic abso ⁇ tion or accumulation of dmgs in the blood stream followed by distribution throughout the entire body.
  • Administration routes which lead to systemic abso ⁇ tion include, without limitations: intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, inhalation, oral, intrapulmonary and intramuscular.
  • Each of these administration routes expose the desired negatively charged polymers, e.g., NTP's, to an accessible diseased tissue.
  • the rate of entry of a dmg into the circulation has been shown to be a function of molecular weight or size.
  • a liposome or other dmg carrier comprising the compounds of the instant invention can potentially localize the dmg, for example, in certain tissue types, such as the tissues of the reticular endothelial system (RES).
  • tissue types such as the tissues of the reticular endothelial system (RES).
  • RES reticular endothelial system
  • a liposome formulation which can facilitate the association of dmg with the surface of cells, such as, lymphocytes and macrophages is also useful. This approach may provide enhanced delivery of the dmg to target cells by taking advantage of the specificity of macrophage and lymphocyte immune recognition of abnormal cells, such as the cancer cells.
  • the invention also features the use of the a composition comprising surface- modified liposomes containing poly (ethyiene glycol) lipids (PEG-modified, or long- circulating liposomes or stealth liposomes).
  • PEG-modified, or long- circulating liposomes or stealth liposomes These formulations offer an method for increasing the accumulation of dmgs in target tissues.
  • This class of dmg carriers resists opsonization and elimination by the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS or RES), thereby enabling longer blood circulation times and enhanced tissue exposure for the encapsulated dmg (Lasic et al. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2601-2627; Ishiwataet al, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 1005-1011).
  • liposomes have been shown to accumulate selectively in tumors, presumably by extravasation and capture in the neovascularized target tissues (Lasic et al, Science 1995, 267, 1275-1276; Oku et al, 1995, Biochim. Biophys. Ada, 1238, 86-90).
  • the long-circulating liposomes enhance the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dmgs, particularly compared to conventional cationic liposomes which are known to accumulate in tissues of the MPS (Liu et al, J. Biol Chem. 1995, 42, 24864-24870; Choi et al, International PCT Publication No.
  • WO 96/10391 Ansell et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/10390; Holland et al, International PCT Publication No. WO 96/10392; all of these are inco ⁇ orated by reference herein).
  • Long-circulating liposomes are also likely to protect dmgs from nuclease degradation to a greater extent compared to cationic liposomes, based on their ability to avoid accumulation in metabolically aggressive MPS tissues such as the liver and spleen. All of these references are inco ⁇ orated by reference herein.
  • compositions prepared for storage or administration which include a pharmaceutically effective amount of the desired compounds in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
  • Acceptable carriers or diluents for therapeutic use are well known in the pharmaceutical art, and are described, for example, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing Co. (A.R. Gennaro edit. 1985) hereby inco ⁇ orated by reference herein.
  • preservatives, stabilizers, dyes and flavoring agents may be provided. Id. at 1449. These include sodium benzoate, sorbic acid and esters of /?-hydroxybenzoic acid.
  • antioxidants and suspending agents may be used.
  • a pharmaceutically effective dose is that dose required to prevent, inhibit the occurrence, or treat (alleviate a symptom to some extent, preferably all of the symptoms) of a disease state.
  • the pharmaceutically effective dose depends on the type of disease, the composition used, the route of administration, the type of mammal being treated, the physical characteristics of the specific mammal under consideration, concurrent medication, and other factors which those skilled in the medical arts will recognize. Generally, an amount between OJ mg/kg and 100 mg/kg body weight/day of active ingredients is administered dependent upon potency of the negatively charged polymer.
  • the invention provides nucleic acid catalysts that can be delivered exogenously to specific cells as required.
  • Local ribozyme administration offers the advantages of achieving high tissue concentrations of ribozymes and limiting their exposure to catabolic and excretory mechanisms. Although local routes of administration provide access to pathologies involving a number of organ systems, systemic administration would make ribozyme treatment of several other major human diseases feasible.
  • tissue accumulate oligonucleotides and/or oligonucleotide formulations following systemic administration.
  • These tissues include sites of inflammation (Wu et al. 1993, Cancer Res. 53: 3765-3767), solid tumors (Yuan et al. 1994, Cancer Res. 54: 3352-3356), kidney (Cossum et al. 1993, J. Pharmaco. and Exp. Ther. 267: 1181-1190), brain (Wu et al. 1996, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 276: 206- 1 ) and those rich in reticulo-endothelial cells (liver, spleen, lymphatics; Litzinger et al. 1994, Biochim.
  • RES reticulo-endothelial system
  • the invention features method of treating inflammation using ribozymes.
  • Inflammatory processes underlie the pathology of a large number of human diseases. Many of these processes can be blocked by inhibiting the expression of inflammatory mediators and or their receptors (Cohen et al. 1995, Am. J. Med. 99: 45 S- 52S). Systemic administration of monoclonal antibodies specific to these mediators have been shown to be efficacious in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (Arend et al. 1990, Arthritis and Rheumatism 33: 305-315).
  • TNF-a has been shown participate in a variety of inflammatory processes and is produced mainly by macrophages which are known to accumulate cationic lipid- formulated ribozymes (Masahiro et al. 1990, J. Immunology. 144: 1425-1431).
  • Anti- mouse TNF- a ribozymes were effective in cell culture, thus, it may be possible that systemic delivery of ribozymes by a liposome formulation could be an effective therapeutic in the above mentioned inflammatory disease states.
  • the invention features methods of treating diseases involving RES using ribozymes.
  • RES tissues liver, spleen and lymphatics.
  • Pathology involving the RES includes a number of infectious /o
  • HIV human immunodeficiency vims
  • mycobacterium infections including tuberculosis (TB), avium, and leprae (leprosy).
  • TB tuberculosis
  • leprae leprae
  • the invention features method of treating cancer using ribozymes.
  • antisense phosphorothioates have been have been reported to exhibit antitumor efficacy in a murine model of Burkitt's lymphoma (Huang et al. 1995, Mol. Med. 1: 647-658).
  • the molecular targets of systemic antineoplastic ribozymes could include oncogenes, protooncogenes, or angiogenic factors and receptors. Although the link between oncogenes and tumorigenesis is now well established, the specific mutations that lead to activation of a proto-oncogene can be widely diverse.
  • Upregulation of protooncogene products is also common in human cancer. Reducing the levels of these gene products may be beneficial in treatment of cancer.
  • angiogenic factors or receptors may provide good alternate or adjunct targets to oncogenes for the therapy of solid tumors and their metastases.
  • Applicant in a non-limiting example infra, show ribozymes targeting angiogenic mediators.
  • Angiogenesis refers to formation of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels which is an essential process in reproduction, development and wound repair.
  • Tumor angiogenesis refers to the induction of the growth of blood vessels from surrounding tissue into a solid tumor. Tumor growth and tumor metastasis are dependent on angiogenesis (for a review see Folkman, 1985, Nature Med. 1: 27-31; Folkman 1990 J. Natl. Cancer Inst, 82, 4; Folkman and Shing, 1992 J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10931).
  • Tumor metastasis refers to the transfer and/or migration of tumor cells, originating from a primary tumor, from one part of the body or organ to another. Most malignant tumors have the capacity to metastasize.
  • Tumor refers to a new growth of tissue wherein the cells multiply, divide and grow uncontrolled.
  • the invention features a method of treating non-hepatic ascites using ribozymes.
  • Nonhepatic ascites or peritoneal fluid accumulation resulting from abdominal cancer and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) can result in significant fluid loss from the intravascular space and hypovolemia. If ascites volumes are large, abdominal pain, hypovolemic hypotension, electrolyte abnormalities and respiratory difficulties can ensue. Thus, if ascites is left untreated, it can be life threatening.
  • Evidence is now accumulating that nonhepatic ascites may be induced, at least in part, by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). For this reason, nonhepatic ascites may be a potential therapeutic indication for ribozymes directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors delivered either systemically or regionally to the peritoneum.
  • VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor
  • Ovaries can be overstimulated by hormonal therapy during fertility treatment.
  • women can experience ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome which is associated with grossly enlarged ovaries and extreme ascites fluid accumulation.
  • This fluid accumulation is thought to be induced by the release of a vascular permeability agent which may interact with vessels of the peritoneal cavity leading to plasma extravasation.
  • Abramov and co-workers (1997, Fertil Steril 67: 261) have shown that plasma VEGF levels are elevated in OHSS and return to normal upon resolution of the syndrome.
  • VEGF is elevated in the semm and follicular fluid of OHSS patients and that the source of this VEGF may be the luteinizing granulosa cells of the ovary (Krasnow et al., 1996, Fertil. Steril. 65: 552). McClure et al. (1994, Lancet 344, 235) concluded that VEGF is the key mediator of OHSS ascites production since rhVEGF increases OHSS ascites but not liver ascites and that this increase is reversible by rhVEGF antisemm.
  • reducing the expression of VEGF receptors in the vasculature of the peritoneum may have a therapeutic benefit in OHSS by substantially reducing OHSS- stimulated ascites production. Since VEGF can interact with VEGF receptors on vessels throughout the peritoneum from ovarian release of VEGF into systemic circulation, systemic treatment may represent the best option for treating this syndrome.
  • Malignant ascites Another form of ascites can be induced by malignancies of the peritoneum including breast, pancreatic, uterine and colorectal cancers. It is thought that certain cancers produce factors which influence peritoneal vascular permeability leading to plasma extravasation (Garrison et al., 1986; Ann. Surg. 203: 644; Garrison et al., 1987, J. Surg. Res. 42: 126; Nagy et al, 1993, Cancer Res. 53: 2631). Several solid tumors including some colorectal and breast carcinomas are known to secrete VEGF to recmit blood vessels for sustained growth and metastasis. This secreted VEGF may also serve to increase local vasculature permeability.
  • Tissue accumulation of ribozymes can be improved by formulation, conjugation, or further chemical stabilization of the ribozyme. Elimination due to glomeralar filtration can be slowed by increasing the apparent molecular weight of the ribozyme, e.g., by liposome encapsulation or bioconjugation to PEG. Applicant has observed that the rate of catabolism can be slowed by a factor of 100 and lung accumulation increased 500 fold by formulation with DMRIE/DOPE reagents. Liposomal encapsulation is likely to have a similar effect on the rate of catabolism.
  • the rate of clearance into non-target tissues could also be reduced by encapsulation into liposomes, provided that the liposomes were surface modified with PEG such that RES clearance were avoided.
  • Increasing the rate of uptake by target tissues can also be enhanced, for example, by conjugation of cholesterol to the ribozymes.
  • Applicant has also observed that in tissues of the RES, accumulation has been increased several hundred fold by complexation with a cationic lipid carrier.
  • Sustained or continuous delivery devices such as ALZET ® osmotic mini-pumps, may also enhance accumulation in target tissues by increasing exposure relative to bolus i.v. administration.
  • Sustained delivery from ALZET ® pumps has been shown to be an effective way of administering a phosphorothioate antisense molecule for inhibition of tumor growth in mice (Huang et al. 1995, supra). Applicant has observed that the rate of ribozyme catabolism in and rate of clearance from the circulation is concentration dependent and may relate to the equilibrium plasma protein binding of the ribozyme. Phosphorothioate DNA is rapidly cleared from circulation when its concentration exceeds the plasma protein binding constant, as is the case after i.v. bolus administration.
  • Osmotic pumps administer oligonucleotides at a slower and constant rate, and therefore may maintain plasma levels near the equilibrium binding capacity. This would result in less of the administered dose being lost to glomerular filtration (elimination) and hepatic extraction (catabolism); more of the administered dose may be available for uptake into target tissues.
  • mice For a typical systemic study involving 10 mice (20 g each) per dose group, 5 doses
  • Identifying a common animal model for systemic efficacy testing of ribozymes is an efficient way of screening ribozymes for systemic efficacy.
  • the Lewis lung carcinoma and B-16 murine melanoma models are well accepted models of primary and metastatic cancer and are used for initial screening of anti-cancer. These murine models are not dependent upon the use of immunodeficient mice, are relatively inexpensive, and minimize housing concerns. Both the Lewis lung and B-16 melanoma models involve subcutaneous implantation of approximately 10 6 tumor cells from metastatically aggressive tumor cell lines (Lewis lung lines 3LL or D122, LLc-LN7; B-16-BL6 melanoma) in C57BL/6J mice. Alternatively, the Lewis lung model can be produced by the surgical implantation of tumor spheres (approximately 0.8 mm in diameter). Metastasis also may be modeled by injecting the tumor cells directly i.v..
  • systemic pharmacotherapy with a wide variety of agents usually begins 1-7 days following tumor implantation inoculation with either continuous or multiple administration regimens.
  • Concurrent pharmacokinetic studies can be performed to determine whether sufficient tissue levels of ribozymes can be achieved for pharmacodynamic effect to be expected.
  • primary tumors and secondary lung metastases can be removed and subjected to a variety of in vitro studies (i.e., target mRNA reduction).
  • VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor
  • a catalytically active ribozyme targeting flt-1 RNA inhibits VEGF-induced neovascularization in a dose-dependent manner in a rat comeal model of angiogenesis. Testing with cytotoxic agents in combination with antiangiogenic ribozymes may also prove useful.
  • the protein product of the proto-oncogene c-fos is a nuclear transcription factor which is involved in tumorigenesis.
  • null mouse mutations of c-fos have been shown to result in viable mice.
  • c-fos is important in malignant conversion of papillomas.
  • c-fos has been shown to up-regulate tumor metalloproteinases (Schonthal et al. 1988, Cell 54: 325-334).
  • c-fos may play a role in tumor angiogenesis as evidenced by VEGF mRNA levels being significantly reduced in c-fos deficient tumors. It has also been shown that c- os is highly expressed in some B-16 cell and human melanoma cell lines (Kroumpouzos et al. 1994, Pigment Cell Res. 7: 348-353; Nakayama et al. 1995, J. Dermatol 22: 549- 559; Peris et al. 1991, Arch. Dermatol. Res. 283: 500-505). The expression of c-fos may be directly proportional to metastatic potential in B-16 melanoma cell lines. With this evidence, it is reasonable to conclude that c-fos represents a suitable systemic ribozyme target in either the Lewis lung, B-16 melanoma, or human melanoma models.
  • ribozyme formulations including cationic lipid complexes which may be useful for inflammatory diseases (e.g., DIMRIE/DOPE, etc.) and RES evading liposomes which may be used to enhance vascular exposure of the ribozymes, are of interest in cancer models due to their presumed biodistribution to the lung.
  • liposome formulations can be used for delivering ribozymes to sites of pathology linked to an angiogenic response.
  • sequences of the ribozymes that are chemically synthesized, useful in this study are non-limiting examples. Those in the art will recognize that these sequences are representative only of many more such sequences where the enzymatic portion of the ribozyme (all but the binding arms) is altered to affect activity.
  • stem-loop II sequence of hammerhead ribozymes can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequences provided a minimum of two base-paired stem stmcture can form.
  • stem-loop IV sequence of hai ⁇ in ribozymes listed in Tables IV (5'-CACGUUGUG-3 ?
  • sequences listed in Tables III and IV may be formed of ribonucleotides or other nucleotides or non- 06
  • ribozymes which have enzymatic activity
  • ribozymes are equivalent to the ribozymes described specifically in the Tables.
  • Targets for useful ribozymes can be determined as disclosed in Draper et al, WO 93/23569; Sullivan et al, WO 93/23057; Thompson et al, WO 94/02595; Draper et al, WO 95/04818; McSwiggen et al, US Patent No. 5,525,468 and hereby inco ⁇ orated by reference herein in totality. Rather than repeat the guidance provided in those documents here, below are provided specific examples of such methods, not limiting to those in the art. Ribozymes to such targets are designed as described in those applications and synthesized to be tested in vitro and in vivo, as also described. Such ribozymes can also be optimized and delivered as described therein.
  • the sequence of human c-raf mRNAs were screened for optimal ribozyme target sites using a computer folding algorithm. Hammerhead or hai ⁇ in ribozyme cleavage sites were identified. These sites are shown in Tables XII-XIX (All sequences are 5' to 3' in the tables)
  • the nucleotide base position is noted in the Tables as that site to be cleaved by the designated type of ribozyme.
  • the nucleotide base position is noted in the Tables as that site to be cleaved by the designated type of ribozyme.
  • Raf RNAs are highly homologous in certain regions, some ribozyme target sites are also homologous (see Table XVIII and XIX). In this case, a single ribozyme will target different classes of Raf RNA. The advantage of one ribozyme that targets several classes of Raf RNA is clear, especially in cases where one or more of these RNAs may contribute to the disease state.
  • arm lengths can be chosen to optimize activity. Generally, at least 5 bases on each arm are able to bind to, or otherwise interact with, the target RNA. Ribozymes of the hammerhead or hai ⁇ in motif were designed to anneal to various sites in the mRNA message. The binding arms are complementary to the target site sequences described above.
  • the following examples demonstrate the selection of ribozymes that cleave c-raf RNA.
  • the methods described herein represent a scheme by which ribozymes may be derived that cleave other RNA targets required for cell division. Also provided is a description of how such ribozymes may be delivered to cells.
  • the examples demonstrate that upon delivery, the ribozymes inhibit cell proliferation in culture and modulate gene expression in vivo. Moreover, significantly reduced inhibition is observed if mutated ribozymes that are catalytically inactive are applied to the cells. Thus, inhibition requires the catalytic activity of the ribozymes.
  • the sequence of human c-raf RNA was screened for accessible sites using a computer folding algorithm. Regions of the mRNA that did not form secondary folding stmctures and contained potential hammerhead and/or hai ⁇ in ribozyme cleavage sites were identified. The sequences of these cleavage sites are shown in tables XII-XIX.
  • Ribozyme target sites were chosen by analyzing genomic sequences of human c-raf (GenBank Accession No. X03484; Bonner et al, 1986, Nucleic Acids Research, 14, oo
  • Ribozyme target sites within A-Raf were chosen by analyzing genomic sequences of human A-raf-1 (GenBank Accession No. X04790; Beck et al, 1987, Nucleic Acids Research, 115, 595-609). Ribozyme target sites within B-Raf were chosen by analyzing genomic sequences of human B-raf-1 (GenBank Accession No. M95712 M95720 X54072; Sitanandam et al, 1990, Oncogene, 5, 1775- 1780).
  • Ribozymes of the hammerhead or hai ⁇ in motif were designed to anneal to various sites in the RNA message.
  • the binding arms are complementary to the target site sequences described above.
  • the ribozymes were chemically synthesized. The method of synthesis used followed the procedure for normal RNA synthesis as described in Usman et al., (1987 J. Am. Chem. Soc, 109, 7845), Scaringe et al., (1990 Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 5433) and Wincott et al., supra, and made use of common nucleic acid protecting and coupling groups, such as dimethoxytrityl at the 5'-end, and phosphoramidites at the 3'- end. The average stepwise coupling yields were >98%.
  • Inactive ribozymes were synthesized by substituting a U for G5 and a U for A14
  • Ribozymes were modified to enhance stability by modification with nuclease resistant groups, for example, 2'-amino, 2'-C-allyl, 2'-flouro, 2'-O-methyl, 2'-H (for a review see Usman and Cedergren, 1992 TIBS 17, 34). Ribozymes were purified by gel electrophoresis using general methods or were purified by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; See Wincott et al., supra; the totality of which is hereby inco ⁇ orated herein by reference) and were resuspended in water. The sequences of the chemically synthesized ribozymes used in this study are shown below in Table XII-XIX.
  • Ribozymes targeted to the human c-raf RNA are designed and synthesized as described above. These ribozymes can be tested for cleavage activity in vitro, for example using the following procedure.
  • the target sequences and the nucleotide location within the c-raf mRNA are given in Table XII.
  • RNA for ribozyme cleavage assay is prepared by in vitro transcription in the presence of [a- 32 p] CTP, passed over a G 50 Sephadex column by spin chromatography and used as substrate RNA without further purification.
  • substrates are 5'-32p-end labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase enzyme.
  • Assays are performed by pre-warming a 2X concentration of purified ribozyme in ribozyme cleavage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 at 37°C, 10 mM MgCt ⁇ ) and the cleavage reaction was initiated by adding the 2X ribozyme mix to an equal volume of substrate RNA (maximum of 1-5 nM) that was also pre-warmed in cleavage buffer. As an initial screen, assays are carried out for 1 hour at o
  • RNA cleavage products generated by ribozyme cleavage are visualized on an autoradiograph of the gel. The percentage of cleavage is determined by Phosphor Imager® quantitation of bands representing the intact substrate and the cleavage products.
  • Example 5 Ability of c-raf Ribozymes to Inhibit Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation.
  • Ribozymes targeting sites in c-Raf mRNA were synthesized using modifications that confer nuclease resistance (Beigelman, 1995, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25702).
  • the ribozymes were screened for their ability to inhibit cell proliferation in serum-starved primary rat aortic smooth muscle cells as described by Jarvis et al. (1996, 7?NJ 2, 419; inco ⁇ orated by reference herein).
  • the ribozyme targeting site represented by Seq ID ⁇ os 175 and 198 showed particularly high activity in inhibiting cell proliferation.
  • An inactive control ribozyme was synthesized which had identical substrate binding arms but contained mutations in the catalytic core that eliminate cleavage activity.
  • cationic lipids have been shown to enhance the bioavailability of oligonucleotides to cells in culture (Bennet, C. F., et al., 1992, Mol. Pharmacology, 41, 1023-1033).
  • ribozymes were complexed with cationic lipids.
  • the cationic lipid, Lipofectamine (a 3:1 (w/w) formulation of DOSPA (2,3-dioleyloxy- ⁇ -[2(sperminecarboxamido)ethyl]- ⁇ , ⁇ - dimethyl-1-propanaminium trifluoroacetate) and dioleoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine (DOPE)) was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
  • DMRIE N-[l-(2,3- ditetradecyloxy)propyl]-N,N-dimethyl-N-hydroxyethylammonium bromide
  • VICAL VICAL
  • DMRIE was resuspended in CHCI3 and mixed at a 1:1 molar ratio with dioleoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine (DOPE).
  • DOPE dioleoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine
  • the CHCI3 was evaporated, the lipid was resuspended in water, vortexed for 1 minute and bath sonicated for 5 minutes.
  • Ribozyme and cationic lipid mixtures were prepared in serum-free DMEM immediately prior to addition to the cells.
  • DMEM plus additives was warmed to room temperature (about 20- 25 °C), cationic lipid was added to the final desired concentration and the solution was vortexed briefly.
  • RNA oligonucleotides were added to the final desired concentration and the solution was again vortexed briefly and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature.
  • the RNA/lipid complex was serially diluted into DMEM following the 10 minute incubation.
  • Serum-starved smooth muscle cells were washed twice with PBS, and the RNA/lipid complex was added. The plates were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. The medium was then removed and DMEM containing 10% FBS, additives and 10 ⁇ M bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was added. In some wells, FBS was omitted to determine the baseline of unstimulated proliferation.
  • Ribozyme Libraries were purchased from Life Technologies (BRL). A schematic of the oligonucleotide design used to constmct said Defined or Comprehensive Ribozyme Libraries is shown in Figure 8. This example is meant to illustrate one possible means to constmct such libraries. The methods described herein are not meant to be inclusive of all possible methods for constmcting such libraries.
  • the oligonucleotides used to construct the hammerhead ribozyme libraries were designed as follows:
  • Nl the Stem I target-specific binding arm of length x
  • Catalytic Core the hammerhead catalytic domain 5'-CTGATGAGGCCGUUAGGCCGAAA-3'
  • N2 the Stem III target specific binding arm of length x.
  • the oligonucleotides were designed to self-prime via formation of a stem-loop stmcture encoded at the 3' ends of the oligos ( Figure 8A). This intramolecular interaction favored an unbiased extension of complex pools of ribozyme-encoding oligonucleotides.
  • Nl and N2 were 8 nt each and were designed to be complimentary to the RNA encoded by the purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) gene.
  • PNP purine nucleoside phosphorylase
  • Nl and N2 were randomized during synthesis to produce a single pool of all possible hammerhead ribozymes.
  • oligonucleotides encoding 40 different PNP-specific hammerhead ribozymes were pooled to a final concentration of 1 ⁇ M total oligonucleotides (2.5 nM each individual oligo). Oligos were heated to 68°C for 30 min and then cooled to ambient temperature to promote formation of the 3' stem-loop for self-priming (Figure 8A).
  • the 3' stem loop was extended (Figure 8B) using Klenow DNA polymerase (1 ⁇ M total oligonucleotides in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, lOmM MgC12, 100 ⁇ g/ml BSA. 25 ⁇ g M dNTP mix, and 200 U Klenow) by incubating for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction mixtures were then heated to 65°C for 15 min to inactivate the polymerase.
  • Klenow DNA polymerase (1 ⁇ M total oligonucleotides in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, lOmM MgC12, 100 ⁇ g/ml BSA. 25 ⁇ g M dNTP mix, and 200 U Klenow
  • the double-stranded oligos (approximately 30 ⁇ g) were digested with the 100 U of the 5' restriction endonuclease Mfe I (NEB) as described by the manufacturer, then similarly digested with the 3' restriction endonuclease BsiWI ( Figure 8C).
  • the cleaved products were treated with Calf Intestinal Phosphatase (CIP, Boehringer Mannheim) as described by the manufacturer to remove the phosphate groups at the 5' ends. This step inhibits intra- and intermolecular ligation of the ribozyme-encoding fragments.
  • Full-length product corresponding to the double-stranded, restriction digested and phosphatase-treated products was gel-purified following electrophoresis through 10% non-denaturing acrylamide gels prior to cloning to enrich for full-length material.
  • the cloning vectors used contained the following cloning sites: 5'- Mfel - Cla I - BsiWI -3'. Vectors were digested with Mfe I and BsiWI prior to use. Thus, vectors cleaved with both enzymes should lack the Cla I site present between the sites, while vectors cleaved with only one of the enzymes should still retain the Cla I site. Pooled oligos were ligated to vector using a 2:1 or 5:1 molar ratio of double-stranded oligo to vector in 50-mL reactions containing 500 ng vector and 5 U ligase in lx ligase buffer (Boehringer Mannheim).
  • Ligation reactions were incubated over night at 16°C, then heated to 65°C 10 min to inactivate the ligase enzyme.
  • the desired products contain a single ribozyme insert and lack the original Cla I site included between the Mfe I and BsiWI cloning sites. Any unwanted, background vector lacking ribozyme inserts and thus still containing the Cla I sites were inactivated by cleaving the product with 5 U of the restriction endonuclease Cla I for 1 h at 37°C. Approximately 150 ng of ligated vector was used to transform 100 ⁇ l XL-2 Blue competent bacteria as described by the supplier (Stratagene).
  • Example 8 Simultaneous screening of 40 different ribozymes targeting PNP using Defined Ribozyme Libraries.
  • PNP is an enzyme that plays a critical role in the purine metabolic/salvage pathways.
  • PNP was chosen as a target because cells with reduced PNP activity can be readily selected from cells with wild-type activity levels using the dmg 6-thioguanosine. This agent is not toxic to cells until it is converted to 6-thioguanine by PNP. Thus, cells with reduced PNP activity are more resistant to this dmg and can be selectively grown in concentrations of 6-thioguanosine that are toxic to cells with wild-type activity levels.
  • the PNP-targeted Defined Ribozyme Library expression vectors were converted into retroviral vector particles, and the resulting particles were used to transduce the Sup TI human T cell line.
  • a T-cell line was chosen for study because T lymphocytes are more dependent on the purine salvage pathway and thus are highly susceptible to 6-thioguanosine killing.
  • Two weeks after transduction the cells were challenged with 10 mmol 6-thioguanosine. Resistant cells began to emerge two weeks after initiation of selection. 6-Thioguanosine-resistant cells were harvested, and the ribozyme-encoding region of the expression vector was amplified using PCR and sequenced.
  • the sequence pattern of the ribozyme region in the selected cells was significantly different from that produced from the starting library shown in Figure 9.
  • sequences of the binding arms were ambiguous due to the presence of all 40 PNP-targeted ribozymes (Figure 9).
  • the sequence of the ribozyme- encoding regions from the 6-thioguanosine selected cells was clearly weighted towards one of the ribozymes contained in the original pool - the ribozyme designed to cleave at nucleotide #32 of PNP mRNA.
  • Applicant first chose to "fix" (designated F) position 3 because preliminary experiments indicated that the identity of the base at this position had the most profound effects on activity; positions 1, 2 and 4 are random.
  • the four pools were assayed under stoichiometric conditions (l ⁇ M ribozyme; l ⁇ M substrate), to help ensure that the entire population of ribozymes in each pool was assayed.
  • Substrate and ribozyme were pre- annealed and the reactions were initiated with the addition of lOmM MgCl 2 .
  • the rate of cleavage for each library was derived from plots of fraction of substrate cleaved as a function of time. Reactions were also performed simultaneously with the starting . ..
  • the relative rate of cleavage for each library was calculated by dividing the observed rate of the library by the rate of the control/starting ribozyme and is plotted in Figure 21.
  • the error bars indicate the standard error derived from the curve fits. The results show that all four pools had similar rates (K e ⁇ ). however, the library possessing "U" at position 3 was slightly faster.
  • Ribozyme pools were again synthesized (Class 2) with position 3 being made constant (U 3 ), position 4 was fixed (F 4 ) and positions 1 and 2 were random (X). The four pools were assayed as before; the pool containing "A" at position 4 was identified as the most desirable pool. Therefore, during the synthesis of the next pool (Class 3), positions 3 and 4 were constant with U 3 and A 4 , position 2 was fixed (F 2 ) and position 1 was random (X). The four pools were again assayed; all four pools showed very similar, but substantially elevated rates of cleavage. The pool containing U at position 2 was identified as the fastest.
  • the remainder of the hammerhead ribozyme "template” remained constant and is based on a previously described hammerhead motif (Thompson et al, US Patent No. 5,610,052, inco ⁇ orated by reference herein).
  • the starting ribozyme template is targeted against nucleotide position 823 of k-ras mRNA (Site A). Down regulation of this message, as a result of ribozyme action, results in the inability of the cells to proliferate. Therefore in order to optimize a ribozyme, we chose to identify "variants" which were successful in inhibiting cell proliferation.
  • Ribozymes and LipofectAMINE were combined DMEM at final concentrations of 100 nM and 3.6 ⁇ M, respectively. Complexes were allowed to form for 15 min at 37 C in the absence of semm and antibiotics.
  • RASMC Primary rat aortic smooth muscle cells
  • the medium was replaced and cells were incubated for 24 h in DMEM with 0.25% FCS. Cells were then stimulated with 10% FBS for 24 h. 3 H-thymidine (0.3 ⁇ Ci//well) was present for the last 12 h of semm stimulation.
  • ten different pools (Class 1) were synthesized by the mix and split approach described herein. Positions 24 and 27 were random and position 28 was fixed with each of the ten different analogs.
  • the ten different pools were formulated with a cationic lipid (Jarvis et al, 1996, RNA, 2,419; inco ⁇ orated by reference herein), delivered to cells in vitro, and cell proliferation was subsequently assayed (see Figure 16).
  • a positive control (active ribozyme) inhibited cell proliferation by -50% and an inactive control (inactive) resulted in a less than 25% reduction in cell proliferation.
  • the ten ribozyme pools resulted in intermediate levels of reduction. However, the best pool could be identified as X 24 X 27 2'-MTM-U 28 (positions 24 and 27 random; 2'-O-MTM-U at position 28). Therefore, a second ribozyme library (Class 2) was synthesized with position 28 constant (2'-O-MTM-U); position 24 was random (X 24 ) and position 27 was fixed with each of the ten different analogs (F 27 ). Again, the ten pools were assayed for their ability to inhibit cell proliferation.
  • Figure 23A shows general formula for four different motifs.
  • a formula for a novel ribozyme motif is shown in Figure 18.
  • Example 11 Identifying Accessible Sites for Ribozyme Action in a target
  • the number of pools within a group equals the number of nucleotides or analogs in the random mixture (i.e., n) to the w power, where w equals the number of positions fixed in each group.
  • the number of groups that need to be synthesized to optimize the final ribozyme equals the total number of positions to be optimized divided by the number of positions (w) tested within each group.
  • the number of pools in each group n .
  • the number of groups total number of positions / w.
  • Figure 23 illustrates this concept on a hammerhead ribozyme containing 12 base pair binding arms. Each of the two binding arms form 6 base pairs with it's corresponding RNA target. It is important to note that for the hammerhead ribozyme one residue (A15J) must remain constant; A15J forms a base pair with a substrate nucleotide (U16J) but is also absolutely required for ribozyme activity. It is the only residue within the hammerhead ribozyme that is part of both the catalytic domain, and the binding domain (arms). In the example this position is not optimized.
  • the 2 '-O-methyl modification stabilizes the ribozyme against nuclease degradation and increases the binding affinity with it's substrate.
  • the total number of pools in each group does not equal n, as in the previous examples.
  • all 64 pools all other positions in the arm are made random (designated X) by the nucleotide mixing building block approach.
  • the catalytic domain is not considered in this example and therefore remains part of the ribozyme template (i.e., constant).
  • ribozyme pools are tested. This test may be cleavage in vitro (see Example 9), or efficacy in a cellular (see Example 10) or animal model, or any other assayable end-point. This end-point however, should be specific to a particular RNA target. For example, if one wishes to identify accessible sites within the mRNA of GeneB, a suitable end-point would be to look for decreased levels of GeneB mRNA after ribozyme treatment. After a winning pool is identified, since each pool specifies the identity of three positions (w), three positions can be made constant for the next group (Class 2).
  • Class 2 is synthesized containing 64 different pools; three positions that were fixed in Class 1 are now constant (designated TJ), three more positions are fixed (F), and the remaining positions (X) are a random mix of the four nucleotides.
  • the 64 pools are assayed as before, a winning pool is identified, allowing three more positions to be constant in the next Class of ribozyme pools (Class 3) and the process is repeated again.
  • the 16 ribozymes are tested; the winning ribozyme defmes the sequence of the binding arms for a particular target.
  • a second advantage to this approach is that it decreases the complexity of molecules in each pool. If one would expect that many combinations within a given pool will be inactive, by decreasing the number of different ribozymes in each pool, it will be easier to identify the "winning" pool. In this approach, a larger number of pools have to be tested in each group, however, the number of groups is smaller and the complexity of each ribozyme pool is smaller. Finally, it should be emphasized there is not a restriction on the number of positions or analogs that can be tested. There is also no restriction on how many positions are tested in each group.
  • the assayed used to identify the "winning" pool of ribozymes is not defined and may be cleavage in vitro (see Example 8), or efficacy in a cellular (see Example 9) or animal model, or any other assayable end-point.
  • this end-point should be specific to a particular RNA target (e.g., mRNA levels).
  • the . end-point could also be nonspecific. For example, one could choose a disease model and simply identify the winning ribozyme pool based on the ability to provide a desired effect. In this case, it is not even necessary to know what the cellular target that is being acted upon by the ribozyme is.
  • RNA target any other assayable phenotype.
  • the process of identifying an optimized ribozyme identifies both the dmg (ribozyme) and the RNA target, which may be a known RNA sequence or a novel sequence leading to the discovery of new genes.
  • positions within the binding domain of the hammerhead ribozyme were varied and positions within the catalytic domain were not changed. Conversely, it is possible to vary positions within the catalytic domain, without changing positions within the binding arms, in order to identify new catalytic motifs.
  • An example is illustrated in Figure 24.
  • the hammerhead ribozyme for example comprises about 23 residues within the catalytic domain. It is unclear how many of these 23 positions are required to obtain a functional catalytic domain, however it is reasonable to presume that if a large number of functionally diverse nucleotide analogs can be used to constmct the pools, a relatively small number of positions could constitute a functional catalytic domain.
  • ribozyme libraries (Class 1) are constmcted: position 1 is fixed (FJ) and positions 2, 3 and 4 are random (X 2 , X 3 and X 4 , respectively).
  • the pools (the number of pools tested depends on the number of analogs used; n) are assayed for activity. This testing may be performed in vitro or in a cellular or animal model.
  • amidites 1 to 10 were assessed using ten model sequences agacXGAuGa (where upper case represents ribonucleotide residues, lower case represents 2'-O-methyl ribonucleotide residues and X is amidites 1 to 10, to be used in the constmction of a hammerhead ribozyme library wherein the modified amidites 1 to 10 would be inco ⁇ orated.
  • Ten model sequences were synthesized using ten 0J 12 g aliquots of 5'-O-DMT-2'-O-Me- Adenosine Polystyrene (PS) solid- support loaded at 22.3 ⁇ mol/g and equivalent to a 2.5 ⁇ mol scale synthesis.
  • PS Polystyrene
  • Oligomers were cleaved from the solid support by treatment with a 3 : 1 mixture of ammonium hydroxide:absolute ethanol at 65 degree C for 4 hrs followed by a desilylation treatment and butanol precipitation as described in Wincott et al. (Wincott et al, Nucleic Acids Res, 1995, 23, 2677-2684; inco ⁇ orated by reference herein).
  • the average stepwise yield (ASWY), indicating the coupling efficiency of phosphoramidites, 1 to 10, were calculated from peak-area percentages according to the equation ASWY (FLP%) 1 n where FLP% is the percentage full-length product in the cmde chromatogram and n the number of synthesis cycles. ASWY ranging from of 96.5%o to 97.5% were obtained for phosphoramidites, 1 to 10.
  • EXAMPLE 15 Determination of optimal relative concentration of a mixture of 2'-O- methyl-guanosine, cytidine, uridine and adenosine providing equal representation of the four nucleotides.
  • the cmde nonamer was analyzed on an anion-exchange HPLC column (see example 6). From the HPLC analysis, an averaged stepwise yield (ASWY) of 99.3% was calculated (see example 14) indicating that the overall coupling efficiency of the mixture N was comparable to that of 2'-deoxythymidine.
  • ASWY averaged stepwise yield
  • the full-length product TTXXXXTTB was further purified and subjected to base composition analysis as described herein. Purification of the FLP from the failures is desired to get accurate base composition.
  • Base composition analysis summary A standard digestion/HPLC analysis was performed: To a dried sample containing
  • TTXXXXTTB 50 ⁇ l mixture, containing 1 mg of nuclease PI (550 units/mg), 2.85 ml of 30 mM sodium acetate and 0.3 ml of 20 mM aqueous zinc chloride, was added. The reaction mixture was incubated at 50 degrees C overnight. Next, 50 ⁇ l of a mixture comprising 500 ⁇ l of alkaline phosphatase (1 units/ ⁇ l), 312 ⁇ l of 500 mM Tris pH 7.5 and 2316 ⁇ l water was added to the reaction mixture and incubated at 37 degrees C for 4 hours.
  • HPLC percentage areas of the different nucleoside peaks, once corrected for the extinction coefficient of the individual nucleosides, are directly proportional to their molar ratios.
  • EXAMPLE 16 A Non-competitive coupling method for the preparation of the X24, X27 and N28 ribozyme library 5'- a s c s a s a ; ag aFX GAY Gag gcg aaa gcc Gaa Age ecu cB -3' wherein 2'-C-allyl-uridine. 1; 4'-thio-cytidine. 2; 2 '-methylthiomethyl -uridine. 3; 2'- methylthiomethyl-cytidine. 4; 2'-amino-uridine. 5; N3-methyl-uridine, 6: 1-b-D-
  • Each pool comprises a 3'-terminal inverted abasic residue B, followed by the sequence Gag gcg aaa gcc Gaa Age ecu c, followed with one random position X in the 24th position corresponding to a mixture of amidites 1 to 10, followed by the sequence GA, followed one random position X in the 27th position corresponding to a mixture of amidites 1 to 10, followed by a fixed monomer F (one of the amidites 1 to 10) in the 28th position and finally the 5'-terminal sequence a s c s a s a s a g a. This is represented by the sequence notation 5'- a s c s a s a s ag aFX
  • the total complexity of such a ribozyme library was 10 or 1,000 members separated in 10 pools of 100 different ribozyme sequences each.
  • EXAMPLE 17 Competitive coupling method (monomer mixing approach) for the preparation of the x 2 ⁇ and X ? _ ⁇ "binding arms" ribozyme library
  • the syntheses of this ribozyme library was performed with an ABI 394 DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) using standard nucleic acid synthesis reagents and synthesis protocols, with the exception of an extended (7.5 min) coupling time for the ribonucleoside phosphoramidites (upper case) and 2'-amino-uridine phosphoramidite, u, (2.5 min) coupling time for the 2'-O-methyl-ribonucleoside phosphoramidites (lower case) and the 2'-O-methyl-ribonucleoside phosphoramidites mixture, n.
  • ABI 394 DNA synthesizer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.
  • Each subset of Class 1 was then divided into four subsets of four aliquots (Class 2) that were reacted with either mA, mG, mC, mU to synthesize the F30 position.
  • Each subset of Class 2 was then divided into four subsets of one aliquot (Class 3) that were reacted with either mA, mG, mC, mU to synthesize the F31 position.
  • the random sequence 5'- x s x s x x was added onto each of the 64 aliquots.
  • the ribozyme library yielded sixty four random ribozymes pools each having an equal mixture of the four 2'-O-methyl-nucleoside at the position x2 to 6 and x30 to 35, and a defined 2'-O-methyl-nucleoside chosen among mA, mC, mG, mU at the positions F6, F30 and F31.
  • the total complexity of such a "binding arms" ribozyme library was
  • EXAMPLE 18 Competitive coupling method (monomer mixing approach) for the preparation of the position 15 to 18 "loop II" ribozyme library
  • CCU 3' is described, with F being a defined ribonucleoside chosen among adenosine (A), guanosine (G), cytidine (C), uridine (U) and X being an equal mixture of adenosine (A), guanosine (G), cytidine (C), uridine (U).
  • the syntheses of this ribozyme library was performed with an ABI 394 DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) using standard nucleic acid synthesis reagents and synthesis protocols, with the exception of an extended (7.5 min) coupling time for the ribonucleoside phosphoramidites (A, G, C, U) and the ribonucleoside phosphoramidite mixture, X.
  • the four aliquots of solid-supports were then individually reacted with either of the four ribonucleoside phosphoramidites (A, G, C, U) to create the F16 position.
  • the position XI 7 and XI 8 were then added onto the F16 (either A, G, C or U) of the four aliquots of solid-supports by repeating twice the same procedure used for the position XI 5.
  • the synthesis of the ribozyme library was then ended by adding the sequence 5'- UCU CCA UCU GAU GAG GCC on the position XI 8 of each of the four subsets of the ribozyme library.
  • the ribozyme library yielded four random ribozymes pools that each have an equal mixture of the four ribonucleoside (A, G, C and U) at the position XI 5, XI 7 and XI 8, and a discrete ribonucleoside chosen among A, C, G or U at the positions F16.
  • the total complexity of such a loop II ribozyme library was 256 members separated in 4 pools of 64 different ribozyme sequences.
  • Example 19 Arm-Combinatorial Library Screening For Bcl-2, K-ras and Urokinase plasminogen Activator (UP A) Substrate synthesis through in vitro transcription: Run-off transcripts for Bcl-2 and Kras were prepared using linearized plasmids (975 and 796 nucleotides respectively). Transcripts for UPA were produced from a PCR generated DNA fragment containing a T7 promoter (400 nucleotides).
  • Transcription volume was then increased to 200ul with buffer containing 50mM TRIS pH 7.5, lOOmM KC1, and 2mM MgCl 2 and spin column purified over Bio-Gel P-60 (BioRad) equilibrated in the same buffer. lOOul of transcript was then applied to 750ul of packed resin.
  • the estimated size of the cleavage product is therefore compared with the potential sites to identify the exact site of cleavage.
  • This protocol has been completed on three different transcripts: Bcl-2 (figure 25), K-ras (figure 26), and UPA (figure 27).
  • Bcl-2 (figure 25), K-ras (figure 26), and UPA (figure 27).
  • the data is summarized in the figures. All potential hammerhead ribozyme cleavage sites are indicated in the graph with a short vertical line. The actual sites identified are indicated in the graph.
  • the size of the bar reflects the intensity of the cleavage product from the cleavage reaction.
  • Ribozymes Two ribozymes targeted against the same site in the bcl-2 transcript (SeqJD#9, figure 25) were synthesized, but the two ribozymes were stabilized using two different chemistries (U4/U7 amino and U4 c-allyl). Ribozymes (200 nM) were delivered using lipofectamine (7.2 mM) for 3 hours into MCF-7 cells (50% confluency). Cellular RNA was harvested 24 hours after delivery, analyzed by RNase protectection analysis (RPA) and normalized to GAPDH mRNA in triplicate samples. Both ribozymes gave a reduction in bcl-2 mRNA (see Figure 28).
  • a ribozyme targeted against an irrelevant mRNA had no effect on the ratio of bcl-2 mRNA to GAPDH mRNA. All reduction of bcl-2 RNA was statistically significant with respect to untreated samples and samples treated with the irrelevant ribozyme.
  • reaction mixture was quenched with 20 ml of 2M TEAB after 15 minutes at 0 C (HPLC analysis with above conditions showed consumption of monophosphate at 10 minutes) then stirred ovemight at room temperature, the mixture was evaporated in vacuo with methanol co-evaporation (4x) then diluted in 50 ml 0.05M TEAB.
  • DEAE sephadex purification was used with a gradient of 0.05 to 0.6 M TEAB to obtain pure triphosphate (0.52 g, 66.0% yield) (elutes around 0.3M TEAB); the purity was confirmed by HPLC and NMR analysis.
  • Example 22 Synthesis of Pyrimdine nucleoside triphosphates: 2'-O-methylthiomethyl- uridine-5 ' -triphosphate 2'-O-methylthiomethyl uridine nucleoside (0.27 grams, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in triethyl phosphate (5.0 ml). The resulting clear, colorless solution was cooled to 0 C with an ice bath under an argon atmosphere. Phosphoms oxychloride (2.0 eq., 0J90 ml) was then added to the reaction mixture with vigorous stirring.
  • Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 0.2eq., 25 mg) was added, the solution warmed to room temperature and the reaction was monitored by HPLC, using a sodium perchlorate gradient. After 5 hours at 20 C, tributylamine (1.0 ml) was added followed by anhydrous acetonitrile (10.0 ml), and after 5 minutes tributylammonium pyrophosphate (4.0 eq., 1.8 g) was added. The reaction mixture was quenched with 20 ml of 2M TEAB after 15 minutes at 20 C (HPLC analysis with above conditions showed consumption of monophosphate at 10 minutes) then stirred ovemight at room temperature.
  • DMAP Dimethylaminopyridine
  • BUFFER 1 Materials Used in Bacteriophage T7 RNA Polymerase Reactions BUFFER 1: Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 1 (400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8J), 200 mM MgCl 2 , 100 mM DTT, 50 mM spermidine, and 0.1% triton X-100.
  • LiCl Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction methanol, LiCl is added and the buffer is diluted such that the final reaction conditions for condition 1 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.1), 20mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM DTT, 5 mM spermidine, 0.01% triton X-100, 10% methanol, and 1 mM LiCl.
  • BUFFER 2 Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 2(400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8J), 200 mM MgCl 2 , 100 mM DTT, 50 mM spermidine, and 0.1% triton X-100.
  • LiCl Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction PEG, LiCl is added and the buffer is diluted such that the final reaction conditions for buffer 2 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.1), 20mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM DTT, 5 mM spermidine, 0.01% triton X-100, 4% PEG, and 1 mM LiCl.
  • BUFFER 3 Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 3 (400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 120 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM DTT, 10 mM spermidine and 0.02% triton X-100. Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction PEG is added and the buffer is , , , ,
  • buffer 3 diluted such that the final reaction conditions for buffer 3 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.0), 12 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM DTT, 1 mM spermidine, 0.002% triton X-100, and 4% PEG.
  • BUFFER 4 Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 4 (400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 120 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM DTT, 10 mM spermidine and 0.02% triton X-100.
  • buffer 4 Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction PEG, methanol is added and the buffer is diluted such that the final reaction conditions for buffer 4 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.0), 12 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM DTT, 1 mM spermidine, 0.002% triton X-100, 10% methanol, and 4% PEG.
  • BUFFER 5 Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 5 (400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 120 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM DTT, 10 mM spermidine and 0.02% triton X-100.
  • buffer 5 Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction PEG, LiCl is added and the buffer is diluted such that the final reaction conditions for buffer 5 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.0), 12 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM DTT, 1 mM spermidine, 0.002% triton X-100, 1 mM LiCl and 4% PEG.
  • BUFFER 6 Reagents are mixed together to form a 10X stock solution of buffer 6 (400 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 120 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM DTT, 10 mM spermidine and 0.02% triton X-100.
  • methanol Prior to initiation of the polymerase reaction PEG, methanol is added and the buffer is diluted such that the final reaction conditions for buffer 6 consisted of : 40mM tris pH (8.0), 12 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM DTT, 1 mM spermidine, 0.002% triton X-100, 10% methanol, and 4% PEG.
  • Each modified nucleotide triphosphate was individully tested in buffers 1 through 6 at two different temperatures (25 and 37°C). Buffers 1-6 tested at 25°C were designated conditions 1-6 and buffers 1-6 test at 37°C were designated conditions 7-12 (table VII).
  • Y639F mutant T7 polymerase (Sousa and Padilla, Supra) (0.3-2 mg/20 ml reaction), NTP's (2 mM each), DNA template (10 pmol), inorganic pyrophosphatase (5U/ml) and ⁇ - 32 P NTP(0.8 mCi/pmol template) were combined and heated at the designated temperatures for 1-2 hours.
  • the radiolabeled NTP used was different from the modified triphosphate being testing.
  • Bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim at 0.4 U/ ⁇ L concentration. Applicant used the commercial buffer supplied with the enzyme and 0.2 ⁇ Ci alpha- 32 P NTP in a 50 ⁇ L reaction with nucleotides triphosphates at 2 mM each. The template was double-stranded PCR fragment, which was used in previous screens. Reactions were carried out at 37°C for 1 hour. 10 ⁇ L of the sample was mn on a 7.5% analytical PAGE and bands were quantitated using a Phosphorlmager. Results are calculated as a comparison to an "all ribo" control (non-modified nucleoside triphosphates) and the results are in Table IX.
  • Two modified cyti dines (2'-NH 2 -CTP or 2'dCTP) were inco ⁇ orated along with 2'-his-NH 2 -UTP with identical efficiencies.
  • 2'-his-NH 2 -UTP and 2'-NH 2 -CTP were then tested with various unmodified and modified adenosine triphosphates in the same buffer (Table Xb).
  • the best modified adenosine triphosphate for inco ⁇ oration with both 2'-his- NH 2 -UTP and 2'-NH 2 -CTP was 2'-NH 2 -DAPTP.
  • EXAMPLE 27 Optimization of Reaction conditions for Inco ⁇ oration of Modified Nucleotide Triphosphate The combination of 2'-his-NH 2 -UTP, 2'-NH 2 -CTP, 2'-NH 2 -DAP, and rGTP was tested in several reaction conditions (Table XI) using the inco ⁇ oration protocol described in example 14. The results demonstrate that of the buffer conditions tested, inco ⁇ oration of these modified nucleoside triphosphates occur in the presence of both methanol and LiCl.
  • Example 28 Deprotection of Ribozyme in a 96 Well Plate
  • a ribozyme sequence (200nmole) was synthesized as described herein on a polystyrene solid support in a well of a 96 well plate.
  • a 10:3:13 mixture 800 ⁇ L) of anhydrous methylamine (308 ⁇ L), triethylamine (92 ⁇ L) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (400 ⁇ L) was prepared of which half (400 ⁇ L) was added to the well and incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes. Following the reaction the solution was replaced with the remaining 400 ⁇ L and incubated as before.
  • the solid support was filtered off, all 800 ⁇ L of MA/TEA/DMSO solution was collected together and 100 ⁇ L of TEA.3HF was added.
  • a ribozyme was synthesized using the column format as described herein.
  • the polystyrene solid-support with protected oligoribonucleotide or modified oligoribonucleotide (200 nmole) was transferred into a glass vial equipped with a screw cap.
  • a 10:3:13 mixture of anhydrous methylamine ( 308 ⁇ L), triethylamine (92 ⁇ L) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (400 ⁇ L) was added followed by vortexing of the glass vial. After allowing the reaction for 1.5 hours, the solid support was filtered off. 100 ⁇ L of TEA.3HF was added at room temperature to the vial and the reaction was mixed causing the solution to gel. The reaction was then heated at 65 °C for 15 minutes and then cooled to room temperature. The solution was then quenched with 1.5 M aqueous NH 4 ⁇ CO 3 "
  • a ribozyme was synthesized using the column format as described herein.
  • the polystyrene solid-support with protected oligoribonucleotide or modified oligoribonucleotide (200 nmole) was transferred into a glass vial equipped with a screw cap.
  • a 1:1 mixture of anhydrous ethanolic methylamine ( 400 ⁇ L) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (400 ⁇ L) was added followed by vortexing of the glass vial. After allowing the reaction for 1.5 hours, the solid support was filtered off. 100 ⁇ L of TEA.3HF was added at room temperature to the vial and the reaction was mixed causing the solution to gel.
  • the reaction was then heated at 65 °C for 15 minutes and then cooled to room temperature.
  • the solution was then quenched with 1.5 M aqueous NH 4 ⁇ CO 3 " (ImL).
  • HPLC chromatography of the reaction mixture afforded 32 O. D.u 260 nm of which
  • a ribozyme was synthesized at the 0.5 mmol scale using the column format as described herein.
  • the polystyrene solid-support 24 grs
  • protected oligoribonucleotide or modified oligoribonucleotide 500 ⁇ mole
  • the reaction mixture was then frozen at -70 °C for 30 minutes.
  • the reaction mixture was separated from the polystyrene solid-support by filtration on a sintered glass funnel (10-20 ⁇ m porosity).
  • UN. spectrophotometric quantification and HPLC chromatography of the reaction mixture afforded 160,000 O.D.u 260 nm of which 46.4%) was full length ribozyme.
  • the solid support was filtered off
  • Example 32 Antitumor and antimetastatic efficacy of ribozymes directed against the mR ⁇ A encoding the two VEGF receptor subtypes, flt-1 and flk-1 in the mouse Lewis lung-HM carcinoma model of primary tumor growth and metastasis
  • the Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model is a syngeneic mouse model of metastatic cancer commonly used for antitumor agent efficacy screening. According to Folkman (1995, supra), primary tumor growth and metastasis in this model is dependent upon VEGF-induced angiogenesis.
  • the low metastatic form involves the implantation of a tumor, usually subcutaneous, which sends micrometastases to the lungs whose growth is suppressed by the presence of the primary tumor.
  • the highly metastatic (HM) form differs from the low metastatic variant in that the growth of metastases is not suppressed by the presence of the primary tumor.
  • the HM form is a model in which it is possible to measure pharmacologic efficacy on both primary tumor growth and metastasis in the same mouse without excision of the primary tumor.
  • Applicant selected the highly metastatic variant of the Lewis lung model for antitumor/metastatic screening of ribozymes directed against VEGF receptor (flt-1 and flk-1) mR ⁇ A. These ribozymes have been shown to reduce VEGF binding and VEGF- stimulated proliferation in cultured MVEC's as well as VEGF-induced neovascularization of the rat cornea (Cushman et al., 1996, Angiogenesis Inhibitors and Other Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Ocular Diseases of Neovascularization, IBC Conference Abstract). Pharmacokinetically, Applicant has found that ribozymes distribute systemically following continuous i.v.
  • Ribozymes The ribozymes used in this study were hammerhead ribozymes comprising a 4 base pair stem II, four phosphorothioate linkages at the 5 '-end, a 2'-C-allyl substitution at position 4 (see Figure 1), and an inverted abasic nucleotide substitution at the 3 '-end.
  • the catalytically active and inactive ribozymes were RPI.4610/4611 (active/inactive) and RPI.4733/4734 directed against ⁇ 7t- and flk-1 messages, respectively.
  • Ribozymes solutions were prepared in normal saline (USP).
  • USP normal saline
  • osmotic minipumps Prior to animal implantation, osmotic minipumps were placed in 37 °C sterile water for at least four hours to activate pumping.
  • LLC-HM Highly metastatic variant Lewis lung carcinoma
  • mice 10 cells were injected subcutaneously in mice. Tumors were allowed to grow for 25 days at which time animals were euthanized by CO 2 inhalation and lung macrometastases were counted. Animals with the most macrometastases (approximately 15-20) were selected for preparation of tumor breis and propogation. When tumors in animals selected for propogation reached a volume of approximately 1500 mm , animals were euthanized by CO 2 inhalation and tumors were excised. Tumors were seived through a 100 ⁇ m pore size sterile nylon mesh. LLC-HM cells were resuspended in normal saline to a final concentration of 5 x 10 viable cells/ml (via hemocytometer). Three days prior to ribozyme dosing, all animals were subcutaneously inoculated on the right flank with 5 x
  • Each ribozyme solution was prepared to deliver 100, 30, 10, 3, or 1 mg/kg/day in a volume of 12 ml.
  • a total of 10 animals per dose or saline control group were surgically implanted on the left flank with osmotic minipumps pre-filled with the respective test solution three days following tumor inoculation. Pumps were attached to indwelling jugular vein catheters.
  • the specifications for the model #1002 Alzet osmotic minipump show that they accurately deliver aqueous solutions at 0.5 ⁇ l/h for 14 days. Table III summarizes the experimental groups.
  • Tumor volumes were calculated using the standard formula for an elipsoid volume, (L ' W )/2. Tumor volumes were calculated in triplicate for each animal. A mean tumor volume was calculated for each animal. Group means and standard error of the group means were calculated from individual animal mean tumor volumes. Twenty-five days following tumor inoculation, all animals were euthanized by CO 2 inhalation and lungs and primary tumors harvested. Lung macrometastases were counted under a dissecting microscope (2.5 X magnification). Lungs and primary tumors were also weighed on an analytical balance. Lung weights served as an index of total lung metastatic burden.
  • the growth curve data was subjected to exponential regression.
  • the curve fits show that the tumor growth data fits an exponential curve with a high correlation coefficient
  • Figures 41 A and B illustrate that the active ribozyme reduced both the number of lung metastases and lung mass in a dose-dependent manner.
  • the active flt-1 ribozyme showed a significant reduction (p ⁇ 0.05 by Dunnetts) in the number of lung metastases at the 30 and 100 mg/kg/day doses compared to saline. There was also a significant difference between active and inactive ribozymes at these doses (p , 0.05 by Student's t).
  • RPI.4610 reduced the lung weight to almost normal levels at the highest dose (100 mg/kg/day). There was no observable dose-related effect of the inactive ribozyme on either the number of lung metastases or lung weight.
  • Example 33 Effects of flk-1 ribozymes (active/inactive) on LLC-HM primary tumor growth in mice.
  • a number of human diseases are characterized by the inappropriate proliferation of cells at sites of injury or damage to the normal tissue architecture. These diseases include restenosis, caused by the local proliferation of medial smooth muscle cells at sites of arterial wall dismption by surgery; psoriasis, caused by proliferation of keratinocytes at regions of endothelial cell damage in the skin, and various fibrosis, caused by the inappropriate replication of cells during wound healing processes.
  • cell proliferation may not be causative, yet it exacerbates the disease pathology. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis, synovial hype ⁇ lasia leads to accelerated cartilage damage due to secretion of proteases by the expanding population of synovial fibroblasts.
  • ribozymes which inhibit the expression of the cellular Raf gene products.
  • ribozyme inhibition of the cellular growth factor receptors could be used to inhibit downstream signalling pathways. The specific growth factors involved would depend upon the cell type indicated in the proliferative event.
  • Ribozymes with their catalytic activity and increased site specificity (see above), are likely to represent a potent and safe therapeutic molecule for the treatment of cancer.
  • ribozymes are shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation.
  • Ribozymes of this invention may be used as diagnostic tools to examine genetic drift and mutations within diseased cells or to detect the presence of c-raf RNA in a cell.
  • the close relationship between ribozyme activity and the structure of the target RNA allows the detection of mutations in any region of the molecule which alters the base- pairing and three-dimensional stmcture of the target RNA.
  • By using multiple ribozymes described in this invention one may map nucleotide changes which are important to RNA stmcture and function in vitro, as well as in cells and tissues. Cleavage of target RNAs with ribozymes may be used to inhibit gene expression and define the role (essentially) of specified gene products in the progression of disease.
  • ribozymes of this invention include detection of the presence of mRNAs associated with c-raf related condition. Such RNA is detected by determining the presence of a cleavage product after treatment with a ribozyme using standard methodology.
  • ribozymes which can cleave only wild-type or mutant forms of the target RNA are used for the assay.
  • the first ribozyme is used to identify wild-type RNA present in the sample and the second ribozyme will be used to identify mutant RNA in the sample.
  • synthetic substrates of both wild-type and mutant RNA will be cleaved by both ribozymes to demonstrate the relative ribozyme efficiencies in the reactions and the absence of cleavage of the "non-targeted" RNA species.
  • the cleavage products from the synthetic substrates will also serve to generate size markers -
  • RNAse protection assay so that full-length and cleavage fragments of each RNA can be analyzed in one lane of a polyacrylamide gel. It is not absolutely required to quantify the results to gain insight into the expression of mutant RNAs and putative risk of the desired phenotypic changes in target cells.
  • the expression of mRNA whose protein product is implicated in the development of the phenotype i.e., c-raf
  • RNA levels will be adequate and will decrease the cost of the initial diagnosis. Higher mutant form to wild-type ratios will be correlated with higher risk whether RNA levels are compared qualitatively or quantitatively.
  • sequence-specific nucleic acid catalysts of the instant invention might have many of the same applications for the study of RNA that DNA restriction endonucleases have for the study of DNA (Nathans et al, 1975 Ann. Rev. Biochem. 44:273).
  • the pattern of restriction fragments could be used to establish sequence relationships between two related RNAs, and large RNAs could be specifically cleaved to fragments of a size more useful for study.
  • the ability to engineer sequence specificity of the ribozyme is ideal for cleavage of RNAs of unknown sequence.
  • NTP's described in this invention have several research and commercial applications. These modified nucleoside triphosphates can be used for in vitro selection (evolution) of oligonucleotides with novel functions. Examples of in vitro selection protocols are inco ⁇ orated herein by reference (Joyce, 1989, Gene, 82, 83-87 Beaudry et al, 1992, Science 257, 635-641; Joyce, 1992, Scientific American 267, 90-97 Breaker et al, 1994, TIBTECH 12, 268; Bartel et ⁇ /.J993, Science 261 :1411-1418 Szostak, 1993, TIBS 17, 89-93; Kumar et al, 1995, FASEB , 9, 1183; Breaker, 1996, Curr.
  • the pattern of restriction fragments could be used to establish sequence relationships between two related RNAs, and large RNAs could be specifically cleaved to fragments of a size more useful for study.
  • the ability to engineer sequence specificity of the ribozyme is ideal for cleavage of RNAs of unknown sequence.
  • Nucleic acid molecules (e.g., ribozymes) of the invention can be used, for example, to target cleavage of virtually any RNA transcript (Zaug et al, 324, Nature 429 1986 ; Cech, 260 JAMA 3030, 1988; and Jefferies et al, 17 Nucleic Acids Research 1371, 1989).
  • Such nucleic acids can be used as a therapeutic or to validate a therapeutic gene target and/or to determine the function of a gene in a biological system (Christoffersen, 1997, Nature Biotech. 15, 483).
  • Various ligands can be attached to oligonucleotides using the componds containing zylo modification for the pu ⁇ oses of cellular delivery, nuclease resistance, cellular trafficking and localization, chemical ligation of oligonucleotide fragments. Inco ⁇ oration of one or more compounds of Formula II into a ribozyme may increase its effectiveness. Compounds of Formula II can be used as potential antiviral agents.
  • RNAse P RNA M1 RNA
  • Size -290 to 400 nucleotides.
  • RNA portion of a ubiquitous ribonucleoprotein enzyme • Cleaves tRNA precursors to form mature tRNA [ 13 ].
  • Reaction mechanism possible attack by M -OH to generate cleavage products with 3'- OH and 5 '-phosphate.
  • RNAse P is found throughout the prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
  • the RNA subunit has been sequenced from bacteria, yeast, rodents, and primates. • Recruitment of endogenous RNAse P for therapeutic applications is possible through hybridization of an External Guide Sequence (EGS) to the target RNA [ 14 , 15 ]
  • EGS External Guide Sequence
  • Reaction mechanism 2'-OH of an internal adenosine generates cleavage products with 3'- OH and a "lariat" RNA containing a 3'-5' and a 2'-5' branch point.
  • Reaction mechanism attack by 2'-OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2', 3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5'-OH ends.
  • Reaction mechanism attack by 2' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2', 3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5'-OH ends.
  • a group II intron R ⁇ A is a catalytic component of a D ⁇ A endonuclease involved in intron mobility. Cell (Cambridge, Mass.) (1995), 83(4), 529-38. 21 . Griffin, Edmund A., Jr.; Qin, Zhifeng; Michels, Williams J., Jr.; Pyle, Anna Marie. Group II intron ribozymes that cleave D ⁇ A and R ⁇ A linkages with similar efficiency, and lack contacts with substrate 2'-hydroxyl groups. Chem. Biol. (1995), 2(11 ), 761-70. 2 . Michel, Francois; Ferat, Jean Luc. Structure and activities of group II introns. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (1995), 64, 435-61.
  • Reaction mechanism attack by 2'-OH 5 ' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2',3'-cyclic phosphate and 5'-OH ends.
  • Ligation activity (in addition to cleavage activity) makes ribozyme amenable to engineering through in vitro selection [ 35 ]
  • HDV Hepatitis Delta Virus
  • Wait time does not include contact time during delivery.
  • AAGACGUUC CUGAAGCU 83 AGCUUCAG CUGAUGAG X CGAA AACGUCUU 584
  • ACUCUUAUU GUUUCCAA 110 UUGGAAAC CUGAUGAG X CGAA AUAAGAGU 611

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

Catalyseurs sous forme d'acide nucléique qui modulent l'expression du gène Raf, méthode d'administration, de criblage, d'identification, de synthèse, de déprotection, de purification de catalyseurs sous forme d'acide nucléique et procédés d'identification de molécules d'acide nucléique.
EP98920299A 1997-05-09 1998-05-05 Traitement a l'acide nucleique enzymatique de maladies et etats pathologiques associes aux niveaux d'expression de c-raf Withdrawn EP0980424A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03002270A EP1321521A1 (fr) 1997-05-09 1998-05-05 Ribozymes diriges contre la flt-1

Applications Claiming Priority (17)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US4605997P 1997-05-09 1997-05-09
US46059P 1997-05-09
US4900297P 1997-06-09 1997-06-09
US49002P 1997-06-09
US5171897P 1997-07-03 1997-07-03
US51718P 1997-07-03
US5680897P 1997-08-22 1997-08-22
US56808P 1997-08-22
US6132497P 1997-10-02 1997-10-02
US6132197P 1997-10-02 1997-10-02
US61321P 1997-10-02
US61324P 1997-10-02
US6486697P 1997-11-05 1997-11-05
US64866P 1997-11-05
US6821297P 1997-12-19 1997-12-19
US68212P 1997-12-19
PCT/US1998/009249 WO1998050530A2 (fr) 1997-05-09 1998-05-05 Traitement a l'acide nucleique enzymatique de maladies et etats pathologiques associes aux niveaux d'expression de c-raf

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03002270A Division EP1321521A1 (fr) 1997-05-09 1998-05-05 Ribozymes diriges contre la flt-1

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0980424A2 true EP0980424A2 (fr) 2000-02-23

Family

ID=27574318

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98920299A Withdrawn EP0980424A2 (fr) 1997-05-09 1998-05-05 Traitement a l'acide nucleique enzymatique de maladies et etats pathologiques associes aux niveaux d'expression de c-raf

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0980424A2 (fr)
JP (1) JP2001525667A (fr)
AU (1) AU749561B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2288640A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1998050530A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6602713B1 (en) * 2001-02-09 2003-08-05 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Antisense modulation of protein phosphatase 2 catalytic subunit beta expression
EP1037972B1 (fr) * 1997-12-19 2005-09-14 HK Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clonage non bacterien pour l'apport et l'expression d'acides nucleiques
DE69933856D1 (de) * 1998-02-13 2006-12-14 Koester Hubert Verwendung von ribozymen zur bestimmung der funktion von genen
EP1493818A3 (fr) * 1998-04-29 2006-02-15 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nucléosides triphosphates et leur intégration aux ribozymes
WO1999055857A2 (fr) * 1998-04-29 1999-11-04 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nucleoside triphosphates et leur integration aux ribozymes
ES2402799T3 (es) 1998-07-23 2013-05-09 Southern Research Institute Prepreparación de compuestos de tioarabinofuranosilo y utilización de los mismos
AUPP795198A0 (en) * 1998-12-24 1999-01-28 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Miniribozymes active at low magnesium ion concentrations
US7125660B2 (en) 2000-09-13 2006-10-24 Archemix Corp. Nucleic acid sensor molecules and methods of using same
US6566135B1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2003-05-20 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Antisense modulation of caspase 6 expression
CN101321775B (zh) 2005-10-03 2012-05-23 大学健康网络 用于治疗疟疾的odcase抑制剂
WO2008083465A1 (fr) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-17 University Health Network Dérivés de pyrimidine comme agents anti-cancer
WO2008109365A1 (fr) * 2007-03-02 2008-09-12 Mdrna, Inc. Composés d'acide nucléique permettant d'inhiber l'expression de gène raf1 et utilisations de ceux-ci
US20090318380A1 (en) * 2007-11-20 2009-12-24 Pharmasset, Inc. 2',4'-substituted nucleosides as antiviral agents
WO2009143372A2 (fr) * 2008-05-21 2009-11-26 Intradigm Corporation Compositions comportant des arnsi des gènes a-raf, b-raf, et c-raf et leurs procédés d’utilisation
JP7016511B2 (ja) * 2017-06-20 2022-02-07 学校法人甲南学園 核酸合成法

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1992001806A1 (fr) * 1990-07-16 1992-02-06 The Public Health Research Institute Of The City Of New York, Inc. Selection de ribozymes assurant un clivage efficace d'arn cible
CA2135646A1 (fr) * 1992-05-11 1993-11-25 Kenneth G. Draper Methode et reagent permettant l'inhibition de la replication virale
AU706417B2 (en) * 1994-02-23 1998-06-17 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method and reagent for inhibiting the expression of disease related genes
DE4424762C1 (de) * 1994-07-04 1995-07-27 Max Planck Gesellschaft Ribozym-Bibliothek, ihre Herstellung und ihre Verwendung
AU4412096A (en) * 1994-12-13 1996-07-03 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method and reagent for treatment of arthritic conditions, induction of graft tolerance and reversal of immune responses
EP0996741A4 (fr) * 1997-01-23 2004-06-09 Immusol Inc Analyse fonctionnelle et decouverte de genes a l'aide de banques de vecteurs de genes de ribozymes specifiques a une cible ou bien rendues aleatoires

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9850530A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2001525667A (ja) 2001-12-11
WO1998050530A3 (fr) 1999-07-29
WO1998050530A9 (fr) 1999-03-25
AU7290598A (en) 1998-11-27
CA2288640A1 (fr) 1998-11-12
AU749561B2 (en) 2002-06-27
WO1998050530A2 (fr) 1998-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6127173A (en) Nucleic acid catalysts with endonuclease activity
US6831171B2 (en) Nucleic acid catalysts with endonuclease activity
AU748176B2 (en) Enzymatic nucleic acid treatment of diseases or conditions related to levels of epidermal growth factor receptors
AU749561B2 (en) Nucleic acid molecules having endonuclease and/or catalytic activity
WO1998043993A2 (fr) Acides nucleiques en tant que catalyseurs
US6103890A (en) Enzymatic nucleic acids that cleave C-fos
AU3974001A (en) Method and reagent for the inhibition of checkpoint kinase-1 (chk 1) enzyme
US6656731B1 (en) Nucleic acid catalysts with endonuclease activity
AU3497701A (en) Nucleozymes with endonuclease activity
AU6055299A (en) Hairpin hybridizer molecules for modulation of gene expression
AU757789B2 (en) Method and reagents for the treatment of diseases or conditions related to molecules involved in angiogenic responses
US6280936B1 (en) Method for screening nucleic acid catalysts
US20030144489A1 (en) Method for screening nucleic acid catalysts
US6548657B1 (en) Method for screening nucleic acid catalysts
EP1321521A1 (fr) Ribozymes diriges contre la flt-1
KR20010043111A (ko) Ｃ형 간염 바이러스성 감염과 관련된 질환의 효소적 핵산치료제
WO2002011674A2 (fr) Procede et reactif permettant d'inhiber le canal chlorure active par le calcium 1 (clca-1)
MXPA99007142A (en) Enzymatic nucleic acid treatment of diseases or conditions related to levels of epidermal growth factor receptors
MXPA01002953A (en) Hairpin hybridizer molecules for modulation of gene expression

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19991129

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020116

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20030205