Four months, several admitted service failures, a breach of UK law, and seventy dollars - yet still ongoing
The worst experience I have had with any company in any sector. Not the worst airline. The worst, full stop, and I have dealt with banks, insurers, utilities and government departments.
This started on 6 April 2026 and it is still not resolved. LATAM locked my LATAM Pass account without warning or explanation, which shut me out of seat selection on both legs of a Brasilia to London return. I flew two eleven-hour overnight sectors in a centre-block aisle seat, clipped by service trolleys on every pass in both directions, no sleep either way, on a service I had paid for and been locked out of adjusting. LATAM describes the block as a "preventive measure" and has never said what it was preventing.
Everything since has been me chasing them. Weeks on the phone, by email and through social media before I escalated anywhere. Then Reclame Aqui, then the Brazilian government's official consumer platform, then Resolver in the UK, formally and on the record, from 3 June. Six routes, two countries, one of them a state consumer body. Four months of my life spent trying to get a company to answer a question about my own account.
The people I reached could not help and largely did not try. Hours on the phone with agents reading from scripts, none of whom could tell me why my account had been locked. Dismissive when they engaged at all. Assurances that an answer was coming, followed by the ticket being closed with nothing in it. I asked repeatedly for a manual review by a senior manager with authority to actually resolve something. That request has been ignored every single time. Four months on, the basic question is still unanswered.
Then there is the law. I submitted a Subject Access Request on 29 May 2026 to LATAM's European passenger address. Under UK GDPR the response was legally due by 29 June. It was never acknowledged through that channel at all. LATAM then told me it had acknowledged the request on 30 June and was "still within the required timeframe". That is false. The statutory clock runs from receipt of the request, not from the date the company chooses to notice it. Either LATAM does not know its legal obligations in a market it operates in, or it was prepared to tell a customer something untrue about them. The breach is now with the Information Commissioner's Office.
And this is the part that makes it indefensible. LATAM has repeatedly acknowledged, in writing, that the service I received was poor. They have apologised for it more than once. Having admitted the failure, their answer to four months of my time is 2,190 air miles, worth about seventy dollars, in a scheme whose own restrictions make the miles I already hold nearly impossible to spend. I had already accepted air miles once as an interim gesture while the complaint stayed open. The identical gesture then came back as the final settlement. An apology costs a company nothing, which is presumably why it is the only thing they have offered freely.
Their systems compounded all of it. At one point my frequent flyer account was relocated to Ecuador, a country I have never visited. Repeated requests for an explanation produced silence, then the single word "desynchronisation", then nothing further.
If you fly LATAM, understand this: a booking that goes wrong will cost you months, not hours, and there is no route to a person who can fix it. I have tried six. This is also the case when they simply lock your account for no reason. If you have an alternative airline, use them. LATAM pride themselves on their poor service.
4 April 2026
Unprompted review