8000 targets: a modify/extend of a missing file says a new file is a create by adeelahmad · Pull Request #102 · adeelahmad/aloop · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
1 8000

targets: a modify/extend of a missing file says a new file is a create - #102

Merged
adeelahmad merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/project-thread-qerfr9
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

adeelahmad merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/project-thread-qerfr9

Conversation

@adeelahmad
@adeelahmad adeelahmad commented Oct 20, 2026 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Requested by Adeel · project thread

Before: in live runs 47 and 48 the planner wrote extend tests/common/mod.rs for a test helper module that no target created. targets check refused it with "neither in the tree nor planned" but did not say what to write instead.

After: the refusal now also says that a new file is a create (with its first planned_symbol) and that a later target may extend it. The gate refuses exactly what it refused before.

Run 49 (live, cli, on this branch and #95): 13/13 in 13m50s for $0.87. It had 3 gate blocks, down from 5, and none of them was a suppression refusal or "neither in the tree nor planned".

How:

  • The message change is in plugin/bin/targets.
  • semantic-targets.test.py asserts the hint and was RED before the change.
  • The evidence row for run 49 is added.
  • make ci is green.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_015QxyVf3NgwsgRyYpBgDDTC

Live runs 47-48: the planner's `extend tests/common/mod.rs` for a helper
module no target created was refused without saying what to write instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QxyVf3NgwsgRyYpBgDDTC
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QxyVf3NgwsgRyYpBgDDTC
@adeelahmad
adeelahmad marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2026 11:16
@adeelahmad
adeelahmad merged commit 7dfdb46 into master Oct 20, 2026
5 checks passed
adeelahmad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2026
adeelahmad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2026
…gate branch

Run 49 and run 50 both kept in the evidence ledger. ROADMAP M0.9 records
that M10.2's dependency check should also ask `events approval`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WBVFNrEg85XAnSfHQidCXN
adeelahmad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2026
…ch; docs for M9.31

Conflicts: the OpenCode plugin's header comment (gate-dispatch on task from
master, the door gate last from this branch) and codex-hooks.test.py (both
blocks kept). ROADMAP: M9.31 done, new items M9.48, M9.49, M9.54-M9.59, and
the M9 row of section 0 brought up to date; TRACKING, CHANGELOG, OVERVIEW.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012rsDo9GYzNx8tXucywZHnA
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0