Groover Reviews 

I’ve only just joined Groover.co about I think a week ago and have gotten so much feedback and actual articles and plays from this site ..I can’t thank them enough especially being a ai music creator..I know most of the industry don’t like ai music creation so having this feedback means the world to me and would recommend this site for anyone to use if they’re starting out or already established

Easy to start with. Very good for independent artists. You can do your own campaigns. A lot of different curators for different purposes. Best thing so far.

As an independent musician, I’ve tried several playlist promotion services, and Groover stands out.

Unlike anonymous submission platforms, Groover creates real, transparent connections between artists and curators, bloggers, and industry professionals. The feedback I received was honest, specific, and clearly came from people who actually listened. One curator even shared my track with their team and reached out directly to continue the collaboration — something that simply doesn’t happen on faceless playlist services.

Groover respects both sides of the equation. Artists get genuine access to relevant industry pros, and curators get quality submissions worth their time. That balance is rare.

If you’re an independent artist looking for real relationships in the music industry — not just numbers — Groover delivers.

Very straightforward and easy to use, fairly priced compared to other sites that offer similar things, and we got on a decent amount of playlists thanks to them, as well as a Radio station. It's LIT! 🔥

I just have used the site for the first time. My experience has been very positive. I found a wide variety of curators available to send my music and the response has been great. Also, the site is very user friendly.

I have only run one very small campaign (submitted to 10 curators) this far and it had a 50% success rate. very good results!

Really impressed with Groover. For an indie musician, the hardest part is getting your songs in front of the right people — and this platform nails it, with a vast network of playlist curators, radio programmers and blogs you can pitch to directly.

Curator feedback is honest and constructive, even when they pass, and it's genuinely sharpened my pitching and promo campaigns. Actual playlist adds and media coverage — highly recommended.

A great platform for independent artists

My experience with Groover has been very positive. It has given me the opportunity to send my music directly to curators, media and radio professionals that I probably wouldn’t have been able to reach on my own.

Since submitting my debut single 24F, I have received valuable feedback, playlist opportunities, media support and interesting contacts for my music project. It has also helped me discover new ways to promote my music and reach a wider audience.

I really appreciate how easy the platform is to use and the possibility of receiving direct feedback from music professionals. For independent artists who are trying to get their music heard, I definitely recommend giving Groover a try.

Such an easy way to further promote my music! I am very satisfied! Big Thumb! :D

479
Groover offers a platform for self-created music. Whether the music is good or bad is decided by the people who have the power to amplify the song's reach. It represents a real opportunity—especially for independent artists—and that is a good thing. The fact that Groover does not categorically rule out AI is also very positive; after all, there are both good and bad examples in this realm—ranging from people who put a great deal of effort into AI-generated music to those who simply churn out content in bulk.

Well, I use it to promote my music and I'm very satisfied with them and the opportunities it brings to you. I recommend Groover with no doubt

I understand that there simply isn’t enough room in the market for everyone who creates art — and that is something natural. Not every artist will be able to turn their work into a career or reach the audience they would like to. Still, people need to create because, for many of them, art is an essential form of expression and an important part of their lives. That is why I believe Groover’s value goes beyond the purely commercial side of things — making contacts, finding opportunities, or eventually generating some kind of business. The platform also creates the possibility for artists to connect with people who are genuinely willing to listen to what they are doing. Having access to feedback that is genuine, honest, and at the same time respectful is extremely important, especially when that feedback helps artists recognize aspects of their work that might otherwise take them much longer to identify on their own. A good review doesn’t need to say that everything is great, but it can point out possible directions and help someone improve more quickly. For me, this space for exchange, listening, and guidance has a great deal of value.

I spent about $80 submitting one track to 28 curators through Groover. Every submission was rejected. I did receive feedback, but none of it led to a placement or meaningful promotional result.

My main issue is that the service can feel misleading for independent artists: you pay for curator feedback, not for actual promotion or playlist consideration that produces results. In my case, the cost was substantial and the outcome was 0 placements from 28 submissions.

I would advise artists to be very cautious, understand that rejections with feedback are not refunded, and not expect a real promotional return just because the platform presents a large network of curators.

It's really a waste of money in reality. I've tried out different genres and it could depend on the genre but overall curators have no clue what they're talking about in terms of sound production and they just copy and paste feedback. And I'm not looking for a sound feedback from a playlist curator anyways, if it fits and they like they sound put it just to help out new artist instead giving a nonsense feedback about sound production which clearly the majority don't know anything about. After some trials I don't recommend this website at all. If you're looking for sound production feedback don't look for curators look for actual sound engineers. This website doesn't help.

My experience with Groover has been genuinely excellent.
The platform is professional, beautifully organized and, most importantly, offers independent artists access to a remarkably high-quality network of music professionals, curators and media from around the world.
As an independent artist releasing my debut single, SOMADAYLESS, I have been particularly impressed by the quality of the people and organizations I have been able to connect with through Groover. The communication has been professional, the feedback thoughtful, and my experience has already led to meaningful international exposure and new opportunities for my music.
What stands out most to me is the feeling that Groover genuinely understands independent artists and has created a service that gives their work a serious chance to reach the right people beyond their own country and existing audience.

Thank you, Groover, for the work you do and for giving independent music a place to be heard.
P.Peeva

Groover is an amazing tool for independent music promotion. It provides a direct and honest connection with music curators, radios, and playlist editors worldwide. The platform is very intuitive, transparent, and easy to use. Even when you face rejections, the feedback you receive is constructive and helps you improve your strategy. The support team is also very responsive and friendly. I highly recommend Groover to any artist who wants to take their project to the next level and gain real international exposure!

Basically a scam. You pay for services or playlisting and get a half assed rejection or curators who don’t follow through on their services. Contacting support is also useless as they say curators have endless time to do fulfill their service or they just continue to “try and reach out to them”. It’s a waste of money and can not help you grow. Go to Submithub instead.

Well, see my first review of Groover and then read this before you spend your money. For sending our rock track to classical curators and then classifying our our classical track as rock, Groover has sent us 70 Groovz back, even though we would never ever use Gt.over again. Their algorithm and their suggestions of over 50 curators turned out to be complete waste of time and money - and a lot of the curators sending feedback seemed to enjoy negativity without actually explaining what they mean when they say things like not aligning with their production values, which sounds very knowledgable but actually mean diddly squat in real terms. This site is just a chance for a lot of people to feel self-important and musicians pay a not-inconsiderable amount of money for the privilege. Another major distributor is actually taking our tracks for radio play - they have no issues with "quality of recording" (no further explanation from curator). Groover also uploaded a blurry image taken from our profile image as our banner image - when we have our own banner image. When we replaced the profile image so this could be used as the banner image, the blurry set of legs belonging to one of our guitarists remains as the banner image. This site is amateur hour. We have all worked in the music industry and this seems designed to take money from newcomers hoping to get a break. Save your money. As previously stated, we have been given 70 Groovz back as a refund for damaging our brand, what is a breach of moral rights regarding the banner image as i am a also photographer who has had images exhibited at galleries - and circulating the wrong tracks to the wrong curators. The whole concept of Groover is based on what appears to be childish enthusiasm without any actually knowledge, ability to promote music or judgement. The casual, clap-happy culture that infests a lot of music platforms while taking your money is here in bucketloads. There is nothing groovy about Groover at all in our experience. And despite being a media company, they do not appear to work weekends, so if you have an urgent issue, tough. No one has adjusted the image on our banner or even apologised for taking nearly £140 and sending the wrong track to the wrong curators. If you are starting our, this is a lot of money to waste. We have had to pay for the dubious feedback received - which was mainly critical without explaining exactly what the issue is; or suggested we should check their profile to see the sort of tracks they want after Groover produced a long litt of curators "who would be interested in your track" , which originally would have cost more than £250 had we not edited it down. The track still went to the wrong curators. After uploading our rock track, we found our existing classical track also labelled "rock" when it had clearly been labelled "classical". If you produce more than once genre of music, you have to choose almost every type of music from the extensive list to make sure your music is classified correctly - and even then, the algorithm may make up its own mind. This site uses AI. AI is only as good as the people who train it. I have often been approached to train AI . I always decline because I do not want to pour my USP into a platform for £30ph for companies to profit by by millions. But if you use Groover, as we did, you run the risk that your brand and USP as a creator will be trashed by sloppy imaging software on the platform and an algorithm that might mis-classify your genre of music and waste the hundreds of pounds you have invested in promoting it.
So Groover has replied stating that the banner image can be edited on the site - it cannot otherwise our banner image would be there. You can edit the profile pic but on our site there is no link to edit the banner. Also we are now talking to a robot. The robot is "sorry you feel that way" It offered to put us through to a human. However, the humans are not available and will be back Wednesday - it is now 7pm Tuesday. They are presumably drinking our money in a bar somewhere, whereas we should be. We certainly feel like it after the mness Groover and its algorithm have created. Just avoid. It really isn't worth the trouble. All you get back are more Groovrs as a refund to spend on a site that is not helpful in any way - and the same robot that caused the issues telling you how sorry it is "you feel that way". Plus a whole load of "curators" who seem to enjoy being negative, without actually explaining what they think the issues are. I suspect they don't even know themselves. It is almost verging on a scam, in our experience. luckily, we have a radio distributor more than happy to accept our work. Odd that, isn't it? They have a strict acceptance process, unlike Groover. Keep your money rather than waste it and have to deal with a whole load of problems you do not need or want.

Very artist friendly, unlike many other artist services
they do seam to care about your promotions.
Would use again to gauge if a track is working or not!

Most of time feedbacks is not what we expect, some are incorrectly negative, some not, there are some positive too of course and even so, when is positive In some cases you can find someone that like your music but in the end have to pass, Its a stick of two points, Its a platform not to make money, its an investment of risk that sometimes its not worthy.