Failings in post return process make Finn not worth it
I am writing this detailed review to help potential customers make an informed decision before entering into a contract with Finn.
While the vehicle itself (a brand-new Peugeot 5008) was excellent and the monthly rental price competitive, I cannot recommend Finn due to serious issues in the vehicle return and damage assessment process.
What went wrong
After returning the vehicle, Finn sent us a damage report claiming €4,000 in damages. This was unexpected and highly stressful, as we were confident that we had not caused such damage.
Fortunately, we had taken clear photos at the time of handover. These showed that a substantial part of the claimed damage occurred after the vehicle had already been returned. Despite this, Finn initially attempted to collect the full amount through an automated process, without properly verifying the claim.
Only after repeated follow-up and the submission of evidence did Finn revise the bill. The final amount was lower and somewhat fairer, but the situation should never have reached this point.
Customer service experience
Customer service remained polite throughout, but was slow, rigid, and reluctant to escalate the case appropriately. To date, I have received neither a clear apology nor an explanation of how Finn intends to improve this process for future customers.
Conclusion
The vehicle and pricing were good, but the financial risk after vehicle return lies almost entirely with the customer. Without persistence and proper documentation, we would have been wrongly charged thousands of euros.
For these reasons, I do not recommend Finn
Reply from FINN