While the inspector demonstrated professionalism, the resulting report is disappointingly generic and low-value. It fails to offer any specialized insight, presenting observations that would be obvious to an unskilled observer. The content appears to be a basic template or copy-paste, lacking the detailed analysis and added value we require.
December 3, 2025
Unprompted review
Reply from WoonKeur - Bouwkundige keuringen
Dear Luca,
Thank you for your review and for the extra information you shared. We have now been able to look into your comment. You booked your inspection through one of our partners, so we do not know exactly what they told you a technical home inspection would include, which makes it difficult for us to comment on that part.
What we can confirm is that you selected our most basic inspection. As you described correctly, this is a visual inspection of the property supported by a few basic tools such as a moisture meter. The report is a basic summary that is mainly used for the most essential insights or for meeting a bank requirement. It is not more than that. Our system also shows that our inspector clearly explained the limitations of this basic inspection during the appointment and advised you to add a more specialised inspection while we were there so that we could give you deeper insights. You indicated that you did not see the added value of this extra inspection. You therefore received exactly what you selected: a basic home inspection.
If there is anything we can still do to improve your experience with us, please feel free to contact us. And if you feel you should have been informed better about the limitations or advised differently, please let us know. We are always open to improving our service where possible.