Lucie Ogé
Stafford, England, United Kingdom
1K followers
500+ connections
View mutual connections with Lucie
Lucie can introduce you to 8 people at Proof3
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Lucie
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Activity
1K followers
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisHaving been before, we know this is one of the top events in the eCommerce calendar. So when the opportunity came up to sponsor this year’s Dotdigital Summit, it was an easy yes. Ilan B. Joe Turner Lauren Quayle will be there on the day chatting about the trends, challenges and opportunities shaping eCommerce right now and giving attendees a chance to get hands-on with Sonar, our AI-powered search visibility platform. 📍 You’ll find us in the Sponsors Zone, so come and say hello (yes, we'll have swag/sweets) If you’ve not got your ticket yet, there’s still time - https://lnkd.in/etKfBVcK And if the chance to hear from some of the brightest minds in eCommerce wasn’t enough… Stephen from The Traitors is speaking too 👀 See you there.
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted this🚨 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐑𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐎 𝐠𝐞́𝐧𝐞́𝐫𝐞́ 𝐏𝐀𝐑 𝐈𝐀 𝐩𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭 𝐞̂𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫 𝐣𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞. C’est tentant, n’est-ce pas ? Un prompt, 30 secondes d'attente, et voilà un logo "unique" pour votre marque. Mais en tant que DA, je dois tout de même vous alerter : ce que vous gagnez en temps, vous le risquez clairement en capital. Voici pourquoi l'utilisation de l'IA pour votre identité visuelle est un terrain miné aujourd'hui : 𝐋𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐞́𝐭𝐞́ 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 : La plupart des outils d'IA s'entraînent sur des bases de données massives contenant des œuvres protégées. Résultat ? Votre logo n'est souvent qu'une copie de ce qui existe déjà ! Dans de nombreuses juridictions, une œuvre sans intervention humaine significative ne peut pas être protégée par le droit d'auteur. 𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚̀ 𝐥𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐚𝐜̧𝐨𝐧 : Si l'IA s'est un peu trop "inspirée" d'un logo existant pour créer le vôtre, vous êtes légalement responsable. Le véritable propriétaire peut vous poursuivre pour contrefaçon ! 𝐋'𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞́ : L'IA lisse les concepts. Elle produit du "probable", pas du "mémorable", elle produit des "illustrations", pas de réelles "identités" déclinables sur vos différents supports. Si votre logo ressemble à celui de 15 autres entreprises parce qu'elles ont utilisé le même modèle, votre image de marque est clairement désuète. >> M̲o̲n̲ c̲o̲n̲s̲e̲i̲l̲ d̲e̲ D̲A̲ : Utilisez l’IA pour brainstormer, pour explorer des textures, des palettes, des inspirations d'univers. Mais pour votre identité finale, exigez une création humaine, tracée de A à Z, garantissant une cession de droits réelle et sécurisée. 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐦𝐞́𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐝'𝐞̂𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞́𝐠𝐞́𝐞, 𝐩𝐚𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐞 "𝐠𝐞́𝐧𝐞́𝐫𝐞́𝐞". Et vous, avez-vous déjà utilisé les IA pour générer des identités ? Aviez-vous connaissance de tous ces risques réels ?
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisOrganic search traffic is declining. AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and others are changing how people search. There’s no shortage of opinions on what this means. Many of them are speculative. So instead, let's look at evidence grounded in data. Over the last 12 months, we tracked LLM referral traffic across a group of eCommerce and transactional websites to understand how AI is influencing real user journeys. This is what we found... AI traffic is growing fast. In some cases 400–600% YoY. But it’s still small. For context, one particular client saw ~1.3k AI sessions vs ~200k from organic. So no, SEO isn’t dead. But while AI rises, organic is slipping. We’re seeing ~20% YoY declines, and search demand in Google is trending downwards too. People haven’t stopped searching. They’ve just stopped searching in one place. The real shift is behaviour. Users aren’t browsing anymore. Up to 90–95% of AI traffic lands directly on product and category pages. The middle of the journey is disappearing. That creates pressure elsewhere: - Rankings hold, but CTR drops - Users arrive closer to a decision - AI sends traffic to pages Google wouldn’t even index SEO isn’t just about being found anymore. It’s about being chosen. Because in an AI-driven journey, you don’t get multiple chances. You either get surfaced… or you don’t exist.
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisGoogle confirmed on Friday 3rd April that it had made something of a boo-boo: ❌ Search Console has been over-reporting impressions… since May 2025 ❌ Clicks are fine. But impressions have been inflated. Which makes a lot of this familiar pattern we've been seeing across many clients worth revisiting: 📈 Impressions going up 📉 Clicks going down Plenty of people (understandably) started pointing at AI, zero-click search, changing behaviour etc. Some of that is real. But some of it might just be bad data. And that’s the bit worth paying attention to. Because when the data’s off, the decisions usually follow: You think performance is growing when it isn’t You think something’s broken when it isn’t You start “fixing” the wrong things That’s where this actually becomes a commercial problem, not just a reporting one. As Google corrects things, don’t be surprised if you see your impressions drop. Not because demand disappeared. Because the numbers are getting closer to reality. If you’re using GSC regularly, a couple of simple things worth doing: – Don’t read too much into impression trends on their own – Sense-check against clicks, revenue, and other sources – Export your data now if you want a clean before/after view Main thing to remember: Dashboards are very good at creating confidence. They’re not always as good at telling the truth. Full article available 👉 https://lnkd.in/eh9PHivHGSC Logging Error Yielded Inflated Impressions Since May 2025GSC Logging Error Yielded Inflated Impressions Since May 2025
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisThere’s a growing gap between what SEO is doing and what reporting can prove. That gap is where bad decisions get made. Across multiple accounts, the pattern is the same: Impressions up. CTR down. Traffic...less predictable. We’ve seen cases with some eCommerce retailers where year-on-year impressions doubled, but clicks still fell in the same period. This isn’t a tracking issue. It’s a behaviour shift. People are discovering differently. Evaluating differently. Clicking less. The problem is that measurement hasn’t caught up. There’s no clean way to say: “This visit was influenced by AI search.” - Search Console blends it. - GA4 fragments it. - SEO tools estimate it. So you end up in an awkward position: You can see the change. You just can’t evidence it cleanly. That’s where this becomes a commercial problem. Budgets still need defending. Channels still get judged on performance. But the data you’re using is only telling part of the story. And partial data leads to confident but wrong decisions. Most businesses respond the same way. Another tool. Another dashboard. Another breakdown. But it doesn’t fix it. You just get a more detailed version of an incomplete picture. The gap isn’t your setup. It’s that the ecosystem isn’t built to show this clearly yet. So change your objective. Stop chasing perfect attribution. Start working with directional truth. If visibility is rising but clicks aren’t following, something has changed upstream. That’s enough to act on. Because the fundamentals haven’t moved: If you’re hard to index, you’re invisible. If your content doesn’t help people decide, you won’t get chosen. If your brand isn’t trusted, you lose before the click anyway. AI hasn’t replaced those things. It’s made them more valuable. Less traffic. Higher stakes. By the time the data looks 'clean', the opportunity’s usually gone.
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisPersonalisation is one of the most oversold things in eCommerce. It’s not that it doesn’t work… it’s that most of it is too broad to genuinely influence behaviour. If it was as powerful as it’s made out to be, every site using it would be flying. But they’re not. What actually works is less exciting. Working together with Salesfire and award-winning flower bulb specialist Peter Nyssen, our job wasn’t to “add personalisation”. It was to stop customers getting stuck. So instead of broad rules and generic widgets, we focused on: – Recommendations driven by what people were actually doing in-session – Cross-sells that made sense with the product being viewed – Exit intent that showed relevant alternatives, not just discounts – Email capture tied to behaviour, not blanket popups In other words, help people make a decision instead of giving them more to look at. The results: ✅ 16% conversion rate ✅ 9% average order value ✅ 21% revenue per visitor No extra traffic. No heavier spend. Just less friction in the moments that matter. That’s the bit we see so many retailers miss. They invest in getting more people to the site before fixing what happens when they arrive. If the journey makes people think too hard, personalisation won’t save you. It’ll just make the noise more relevant. Full case study: https://lnkd.in/g-HZfgF4
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisEveryone’s understandably a bit giddy about AI in eCommerce right now. AI for ads. AI for forecasting. AI for Conversion Rate Optimisation. While we don’t want to pee on anyone’s proverbial bonfire, there are a few home truths we need to talk about. AI won’t fix your data. It will amplify it. If… your tracking is messy attribution is wrong campaigns optimise to revenue instead of profit AI will just scale the mistake faster. We see this all the time when auditing eCommerce setups. Lots of raw data. Plenty of dashboards. But very little agreement between them. And if the signals aren’t reliable, automation just makes the consequences bigger. So before asking: “How can we use AI?” It’s worth asking: “Would we trust the decisions it makes with the data we have today?” Because AI is a multiplier. It multiplies good systems. And bad ones. — If you’re experimenting with AI tools right now, it’s worth sanity-checking the data they’re learning from first. That’s something we end up helping a lot of retailers untangle.
-
Lucie Ogé reposted thisLucie Ogé reposted thisOrganic growth is one thing. Showing up in places you can’t easily track yet is another. We’ve been working with a leading Motorcycle Clothing & Accessories brand on their organic visibility (eCommerce & physical store footfall), and this has been a win we've celebrated together recently: “Our presence in AI-driven platforms is increasing.” Not rankings. Not traffic. Presence. That’s where this is heading. Yes, last month was strong on the traditional metrics: 📈 Organic sessions up 📈 Organic revenue up 📈 Clear month-on-month and year-on-year growth But there was noise in the data too with some spam-heavy direct traffic skewing parts of the picture. So instead of over-celebrating dashboards, we focused on what we could trust: 🧼 Clean organic performance 💶 Revenue contribution 🔍 Where the brand is actually showing up And increasingly, that’s not just Google. It’s AI summaries. LLM-driven results. Surfaces where visibility isn’t measured in rankings, but in inclusion. That’s why the current work matters: – Strengthening E-E-A-T across category & product pages – Making content easier to interpret (not just rank) – Tracking brand mentions beyond traditional search Because if AI can’t understand you, it won’t surface you. And if it doesn’t surface you, you’re invisible - no matter how “well” you rank. SEO isn’t just about winning positions anymore. It’s about being present wherever decisions get shaped.
-
Lucie Ogé shared thisI don’t post much on LinkedIn, but I thought this might be worth sharing. My colleagues in the CRO team at Proof3 have just released a tool called RADAR that does a quick CRO opportunity scan for eCommerce sites. The idea is simple: sometimes you don’t need a full audit or months of analysis, you just need a quick sense of where friction might be happening. With this tool, you just drop in a URL and it highlights areas that could be worth investigating, along with an estimate of potential revenue impact. It’s intentionally lightweight and definitely not meant to replace proper CRO work or experimentation. I’ve been testing it on a few sites recently and it’s been interesting to see what it surfaces. If you're curious, you can try it here: https://lnkd.in/eFfB4Vfa We’re still refining it and would genuinely love any feedback.
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisAfter three full years of writing, drawing, and navigating the world of self-publishing, my very first graphic novel is finally here! Taking a 156-page full-colour book from an initial concept to a finished physical product was an incredible learning curve. Beyond writing and illustrating the story, bringing it to market meant teaching myself the technical side of publishing: everything from pre-press colour management and local print production to setting up direct fulfillment. Navigating entirely unfamiliar territory took a lot of curiosity, endless trial and error, and a very determined mindset to get it over the finish line. 3 Raccoons in Canada follows three mischievous characters on a fun, humorous adventure across all 10 provinces and 3 territories to finally reach Toronto, the Raccoon Capital of the World. https://lnkd.in/eUTSxvuB #SelfPublishing #GraphicNovelAuthor #CreativeJourney
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisTime for my annual post iWeb & Proof3 Live thank you's. I am of course bias but I reckon it might just have been our best one yet. Thankfully the feedback form submissions so far back me up. New venue, new formats but ultimately still the same great energy and good conversations with good people. A few things that stuck with me; Trust is quickly becoming a visibility problem, not just a conversion problem. It’s no longer enough to be found. You need to be the brand that gets recommended. Most retailers aren’t struggling with a lack of ideas. They’re struggling with prioritisation. Knowing what to focus on, what to ignore, and how to actually get things done. The most interesting AI examples weren’t the flashy ones. They were the practical applications helping teams save time, improve decisions and remove friction. Perhaps the biggest takeaway was that despite all the noise around AI, the fundamentals haven’t changed nearly as much as people think. A massive thank you to all our attendees and sponsors, it (literally) wouldn't work without you. John Brolly Dan Ford Emilia Whitaker Sarah Logan David Nisbet Luke McFarland Dave O Leary Chris Atkinson Chris Garbutt Darran Matthews Chris Pendse Nadine Pote Nick Fox Andrés Mendoza Taylor And special mention to Ricki Larkin for compering, Ilan B. for chairing the panel session and Lauren Quayle & Tiago Faustino for a brilliant debut on stage.
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisHaving been before, we know this is one of the top events in the eCommerce calendar. So when the opportunity came up to sponsor this year’s Dotdigital Summit, it was an easy yes. Ilan B. Joe Turner Lauren Quayle will be there on the day chatting about the trends, challenges and opportunities shaping eCommerce right now and giving attendees a chance to get hands-on with Sonar, our AI-powered search visibility platform. 📍 You’ll find us in the Sponsors Zone, so come and say hello (yes, we'll have swag/sweets) If you’ve not got your ticket yet, there’s still time - https://lnkd.in/etKfBVcK And if the chance to hear from some of the brightest minds in eCommerce wasn’t enough… Stephen from The Traitors is speaking too 👀 See you there.
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisWe see lots of people selling “AI Search Optimisation” right now. Google’s latest guidance basically says: A lot of is nonsense. For the last 12 months we’ve seen a flood of new acronyms: GEO. AEO. LLMO. Along with endless advice about: - Chunking content - Creating llms.txt files - Publishing pages for AI bots - Engineering citations - “Prompt optimisation” for Google Google’s most recent guidance says something very different. If you want to perform well in Google Search, including AI-powered experiences: ✅ Build a technically sound website ✅ Create genuinely useful content ✅ Demonstrate expertise ✅ Give people information they can’t get everywhere else In other words… The same fundamentals that have worked for years. One line stood out: “You can ignore tactics like chunking content, creating unnecessary AI text files (like llms.txt), or pursuing inauthentic mentions.” That’s Google saying it, not us. The more interesting part is what they do recommend: → Create non-commodity content → Share real expertise → Build things worth referencing → Stay aware of how AI agents may interact with websites in future The irony? The businesses most likely to benefit from AI search aren’t the ones chasing AI search hacks. They’re the ones creating content, products and experiences that are genuinely useful. The technology is changing. The job isn’t. Clarity. Authority. Trust. Still the same game. You can check out Google's guidance here 👉 https://lnkd.in/esPp-iVTGoogle's Guide to Optimizing for Generative AI Features on Google Search | Google Search Central | Documentation | Google for DevelopersGoogle's Guide to Optimizing for Generative AI Features on Google Search | Google Search Central | Documentation | Google for Developers
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked this🚨 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐑𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐎 𝐠𝐞́𝐧𝐞́𝐫𝐞́ 𝐏𝐀𝐑 𝐈𝐀 𝐩𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭 𝐞̂𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫 𝐣𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞. C’est tentant, n’est-ce pas ? Un prompt, 30 secondes d'attente, et voilà un logo "unique" pour votre marque. Mais en tant que DA, je dois tout de même vous alerter : ce que vous gagnez en temps, vous le risquez clairement en capital. Voici pourquoi l'utilisation de l'IA pour votre identité visuelle est un terrain miné aujourd'hui : 𝐋𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐞́𝐭𝐞́ 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 : La plupart des outils d'IA s'entraînent sur des bases de données massives contenant des œuvres protégées. Résultat ? Votre logo n'est souvent qu'une copie de ce qui existe déjà ! Dans de nombreuses juridictions, une œuvre sans intervention humaine significative ne peut pas être protégée par le droit d'auteur. 𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚̀ 𝐥𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐚𝐜̧𝐨𝐧 : Si l'IA s'est un peu trop "inspirée" d'un logo existant pour créer le vôtre, vous êtes légalement responsable. Le véritable propriétaire peut vous poursuivre pour contrefaçon ! 𝐋'𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞́ : L'IA lisse les concepts. Elle produit du "probable", pas du "mémorable", elle produit des "illustrations", pas de réelles "identités" déclinables sur vos différents supports. Si votre logo ressemble à celui de 15 autres entreprises parce qu'elles ont utilisé le même modèle, votre image de marque est clairement désuète. >> M̲o̲n̲ c̲o̲n̲s̲e̲i̲l̲ d̲e̲ D̲A̲ : Utilisez l’IA pour brainstormer, pour explorer des textures, des palettes, des inspirations d'univers. Mais pour votre identité finale, exigez une création humaine, tracée de A à Z, garantissant une cession de droits réelle et sécurisée. 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐦𝐞́𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐝'𝐞̂𝐭𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞́𝐠𝐞́𝐞, 𝐩𝐚𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐞 "𝐠𝐞́𝐧𝐞́𝐫𝐞́𝐞". Et vous, avez-vous déjà utilisé les IA pour générer des identités ? Aviez-vous connaissance de tous ces risques réels ?
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisIt's London Marathon week! (And MS Awareness Week!) 🏃 500 miles covered in training. 🥰 £3,400 fundraised to date. Early mornings, night runs, rain, hail, sunshine, wind, mud, lots of running partners, tonnes of support from my wife and daughter. Now just four days until it becomes worth it. Four days until I don't wake up to Runna notifications saying how many miles it is today 😅 It'll be emotional crossing the line in memory of my dad, but I'm excited and ready to go. A huge thank you to everyone who has supported and donated for MS-UK. It's a small charity that relies so heavily on marathon fundraising and this money will make a big difference to those affected by MS. All support truly appreciated! https://lnkd.in/d5HPhi7R Bib number: 14185 Wave Start time: 10:02 #LondonMarathon #MSAwarenessWeek #DaddyPigImComingForYou
-
Lucie Ogé liked thisLucie Ogé liked thisLast week I had the chance to present in a webinar organised by OMD New Zealand in Wellington, and co-hosted by Microsoft's Adam Goodman, to unpack AI's impact on search discovery. We focused on the practical side of Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO); specifically how brands and government sites can stay visible in LLM answers and expand their digital toolkits. If you're a New Zealand brand looking to get started with GEO, drop us a note!
Experience
Education
-
Université catholique de l'Ouest
-
-
I studied foreign languages (English/German) and business at the UCO during the first term. During the second term I went to London for a 6-months internship in social media. This internship allowed me to improve my English skills while learning new social media and digital marketing skills.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Licenses & Certifications
Publications
Languages
-
English
Full professional proficiency
-
French
Native or bilingual proficiency
Recommendations received
10 people have recommended Lucie
Join now to viewView Lucie’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Lucie directly
Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
Nijam Uddin
OnQuality IT • 909 followers
How One Technical SEO Fix Can Recover Lost Local Visibility Local visibility rarely disappears overnight. More often, a small technical issue quietly limits how Google crawls, understands, or indexes important location and service pages. The problem is that local companies often notice the impact only after rankings, organic enquiries, and revenue have already started declining. In larger local businesses, this can happen when a website evolves quickly—new locations are added, templates change, redirects are updated, or important pages become harder for search engines to access. One technical fix can sometimes make a disproportionate difference. 1. Find the bottleneck before changing the strategy. If valuable location pages are not being crawled or indexed properly, publishing more content or building more links may simply add activity without fixing the underlying problem. 2. Prioritise revenue-driving pages. A technical issue affecting a high-value service or location page matters far more than an error on a low-priority page. Local SEO decisions should follow business value, not just the number of errors found. 3. Measure visibility after the fix. The goal is not simply to make a technical issue disappear. The real question is whether important pages become more visible, attract more qualified searches, and contribute to stronger local performance. The lesson is simple: Sometimes declining local visibility is not a content problem, a backlink problem, or a competition problem. It may be one technical issue quietly blocking the value your website has already built.
1
-
Next Level Digital Marketing
248 followers
🚀 Stop Guessing. Start Dominating Your PPC Campaigns. Most small businesses run ads — few truly understand what makes them win. Our latest guide breaks down the strategies top agencies use to capture prime SERP visibility: ✅ SERP analysis to decode user intent ✅ Competitor intelligence that reveals real market gaps ✅ Semantic optimization for smarter, higher-converting ads If you’re serious about turning ad spend into measurable growth, it’s time to go beyond the basics. 👉 Run your free assessment today to start converting leads. 🔗 https://1l.ink/N7HL53L #PPCStrategy #DigitalMarketing #SmallBusinessGrowth #GoogleAds #LeadGeneration #MarketingTips #ColoradoSpringsBusiness #PaidSearch #AdOptimization #SEM
1
-
The Marketing Eye
650 followers
SEO can feel unnecessarily complicated, particularly when you're running a small Shopify store. But before worrying about technical audits and elaborate SEO strategies, it's worth looking at the basics. Are your product descriptions actually unique? Are your collection pages giving Google enough context? Have you thought about how quickly the store loads on mobile? Small details, but across an entire Shopify store they can add up. We've looked at some of the common SEO basics UK Shopify merchants still overlook — and where we'd start fixing them. Read the full post:
2
-
Rick Ashworth
Yellow Lava • 2K followers
Every year, the SEO industry falls in love with a new acronym: AEO or GEO or Voice Search Optimisation (yes, apprecaite it's not an acronym). Regardless of what it is, it's always the same work with just a new label - often coming with a higher price tag for your external SEO. This week, Benjamin Houy publicly called it out when he shut down his GEO tracking platform, stating: “There’s no such thing as GEO strategy separate from brand building. AI models are trained on the same content that builds your brand everywhere else.” Lily Ray (an actual industry expert) confirmed: “The industry needs to hear this.” And here's my punchy, expert reply: "And we really do." (I spend all day staring at a laptop and having conversations with AI, what were you expecting!). Look, most of what's being sold as “innovation” is just "foundation". It's what any decent SEO has been doing year-after-year. They might write articles and record YouTube about their "insane" new guides that will send your web traffic skyward faster than a Space X rocket, but it's all just good old-fashioned SEO - plus, you've seen how those rockets tend to land...? Can't imagine Elon is reading this. Anyway, the original SEO formula still works: • Write content that genuinely answers user intent • Embrace technical excellence so search engines (and humans) understand it • Create topical authority built by depth and quality, not hacks • Love semantic clarity and structured knowledge, not gimmicks No magic potion. No secret sauce. No new version - it just gets worse every time we remix it. If you lead SEO in 2025, your job is to separate strategy from repackaging. Protect your organisation from shiny acronyms. Build something that compounds. Good SEO doesn’t need a new name every year, it just needs to work. If you're building SEO that lasts, drop me a comment, I'd love to know your thougths . Contact: richard.ashworth@protonmail.com #seo #digitalmarketing #searchengineoptimization #contentstrategy #brandbuilding #aio #leadership #search #topicalauthority
3
-
ClickGuard
2K followers
🚨 Your PPC strategy might be losing money after the click. You’ve invested in targeting, copy, and bidding strategies, yet conversions are flat. Why? Poor user experience (UX) could be killing your ROI. From mismatched messaging to slow load times and confusing layouts, bad UX drives visitors away before they even have a chance to convert. In this carousel, we’re sharing 4 practical ways to align UX and PPC. 👉 Want better conversion rates and lower CPAs? Start improving the post-click experience. 📖 Dive deeper into how UX design shapes PPC results on our blog: https://lnkd.in/d2gZcPhT #PPCStrategy #UserExperience #UX #PPCMarketing #PPC #PaidMedia
3
-
SALT.agency
4K followers
We’ve just published original research from Dan Taylor ♒ on Hugo sites and technical SEO performance in 2026. We analysed 5,000 Hugo URLs to understand what “normal” actually looks like – and where teams quietly fall behind as sites scale. Here are a few high-level signals from the study: ✅ Hugo sites are generally very fast, especially on mobile – but speed alone doesn’t guarantee strong search visibility ✅ Canonical setups are inconsistent, which can make URL selection in search less predictable at scale ✅ Most Hugo sites aren’t using international targeting, even when multilingual setups are likely ✅ Small template decisions can affect thousands of URLs, for better or worse. If you’re running Hugo (or considering it) this benchmark study is a great sanity-check. The link to the full study is in the comments.
13
1 Comment -
Taoufik J. 🔎
Vanksen • 7K followers
SEO in 2025 is no longer just about keywords. Google, but also LLMs and AI-driven search engines, think in entities: brands, people, places, concepts. When an LLM generates an answer, it doesn’t pick a keyword — it connects entities and topics. If your entity isn’t clearly tied to a domain, you risk being absent from Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, or ChatGPT Search. Entity SEO means: - Relevance: Align your entities with the right topics. - Context: Strengthen your signals through schema, internal linking, and semantic relationships. - Authority: Dominate your topical field to become the reference AI will cite. In summary: Keywords get you indexed. Entities make you exist in AI. The real question: Are you still stuck in a “keywords only” mindset? Or are you already building an entity-topic footprint that AI engines will recognize? #SEO #EntitySEO #SearchMarketing #AIsearch #DigitalMarketing #KnowledgeGraph #ContentStrategy #TopicalAuthority #SemanticSEO #LLMOptimization
42
-
Daniel Baker
JDR Group • 215 followers
What should you write about if your customers are asking questions that barely appear in keyword research tools? This is something we were discussing with a client recently. They work in a very specialist industry and wanted to create content around issues such as high scrap rates, rework and concessions. These topics might not show huge search volumes in traditional keyword research, but that doesn't mean potential customers aren't looking for answers. The way people search is changing. Instead of typing a couple of keywords into Google, they can now ask ChatGPT much more specific questions like, “Why are our manufacturing scrap rates so high?” or “How can we reduce rework?” This is why keyword research shouldn't be the only thing shaping your content strategy. Listen to the questions your sales team gets asked, the problems customers bring to you and the conversations your team is having every day. They can uncover some of your best content opportunities, particularly in specialist industries. Sometimes the best topic isn't the one with the biggest search volume. It's the one your ideal customer really wants an answer to. #AEO #ContentMarketing #AISearch #JDRGroup
-
Charles Travers
Charles Travers • 6K followers
Took on a new client recently... Their previous SEO agency hadn't even touched the basics. Zero optimisation on meta titles and descriptions. We're not talking about advanced technical SEO here. This is foundational work that should've been done in month 1. Here's the thing: When you're paying someone to handle your SEO, you shouldn't have to wonder if the fundamentals are in place. You shouldn't be crossing your fingers hoping they know what they're doing. This is why I always start with a full site review before taking on any client. Because if the basics aren't dialed in, nothing else matters. No amount of backlinks or content strategy will compensate for missing fundamentals. If you're working with an SEO agency or freelancer right now, ask yourself: -> Do you actually know what work is being done each month? -> Can they show you clear before/after improvements? -> Do they communicate what's happening with your site? If the answer is no to any of these, you might be in the same boat as this client was.
18
7 Comments -
PPC Geeks Ltd
3K followers
🕵️ ♂️ Are you ready to boost your Google Ads performance? 🌟 Conducting a Google Ads audit is essential for every UK digital marketer! It's a thorough examination of your advertising account that uncovers areas for improvement and highlights what might be holding you back. 🔍 Key benefits include: - Improved Ad Relevance: Align your keywords and ad copy to enhance quality scores. - Better Budget Management: Identify high-performing campaigns and allocate funds more effectively. - Enhanced Conversion Tracking: Make informed decisions by accurately tracking your campaigns' success. Don't miss out on these vital insights! Level up your advertising game today! 🚀 #DigitalMarketing #GoogleAds #MarketingStrategy
1
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore More