Re: [LogiLogi-list] LiquidPub workshop, weaknesses
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
wybow
|
From: Bruno S. <bs...@gm...> - 2010-02-09 14:35:11
|
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Wybo Wiersma <ma...@wy...> wrote: > I just came back from the LiquidPub Second Snow workshop: > http://foundation.logilogi.org/2010/2/9/liquidpub-second-snow-workshop > > Was a fascinating conference with a good atmosphere. > > The presentation on LogiLogi went well, and most people were quite > positive about it (which is good, given that it is the audience most > specialized in things such as LogiLogi, that I gave a presentation for > so far). > > Yet LogiLogi and LiquidPub are totally different, and also aim to do > different things. Where the LiquidPub project mostly seems to be about > research, and replacing publishing, LogiLogi is a simple small project > which tries to build usable software. > > It also gave me time to think about LogiLogi, and it's possible weak > spots. I wrote some Logis about them: > http://en.logilogi.org/Logi_Logi/Weak_Points/Sharing_Ideas=Wybo_Wiersma_125 > http://en.logilogi.org/Logi_Logi/Weak_Points/Usability=Wybo_Wiersma_124 > http://en.logilogi.org/Logi_Logi/Weak_Points/Similar_To/Blog=Wybo_Wiersma_127 > > Ideas and comments welcome, > Good writings Wybo. I'm willing to work on the usability improvements you talk about and other things like spanish translation. I'll have time for this from next month. It would be great if Miguel could find some time too. Meanwhile I'll keep reading the list :) Greetings! -- Bruno |