| What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems R Madigan, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, N Merat Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50, 55-64, 2017 | 671 | 2017 |
| Acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model R Madigan, T Louw, M Dziennus, T Graindorge, E Ortega, M Graindorge, ... Transportation Research Procedia 14, 2217-2226, 2016 | 471 | 2016 |
| The" Out-of-the-Loop" concept in automated driving: Proposed definition, measures and implications N Merat, B Seppelt, T Louw, J Engström, JD Lee, E Johansson, CA Green, ... Cognition, Technology and Work 21 (1), 87-98, 2019 | 360 | 2019 |
| The “out-of-the-loop” concept in automated driving: Proposed definition, measures and implications N Merat, B Seppelt, T Louw, J Engström, JD Lee, E Johansson, CA Green, ... Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1), 87-98, 2019 | 360 | 2019 |
| Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries S Nordhoff, T Louw, S Innamaa, E Lehtonen, A Beuster, G Torrao, ... Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 74, 280-297, 2020 | 343 | 2020 |
| Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations A Schieben, M Wilbrink, C Kettwich, R Madigan, T Louw, N Merat Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1), 69-85, 2019 | 323 | 2019 |
| Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation T Louw, N Merat Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 76, 35-50, 2017 | 277 | 2017 |
| What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? N Merat, T Louw, R Madigan, M Wilbrink, A Schieben Accident Analysis & Prevention 118, 244-252, 2018 | 264 | 2018 |
| Engaging with Highly Automated Driving: To be or not to be in the Loop? T Louw, N Merat, AH Jamson 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment …, 2015 | 176 | 2015 |
| Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. T Louw, G Markkula, E Boer, R Madigan, O Carsten, N Merat Accident Analysis and Prevention 108, 9-18, 2017 | 155 | 2017 |
| Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis R Madigan, S Nordhoff, C Fox, RE Amini, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, ... Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 66, 196-213, 2019 | 136 | 2019 |
| Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential T Louw, R Madigan, O Carsten, N Merat Injury prevention 23 (4), 281-286, 2017 | 127 | 2017 |
| Driver inattention during vehicle automation: how does driver engagement affect resumption of control? T Louw, G Kountouriotis, O Carsten, N Merat 4th International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention (DDI2015), 2015 | 117 | 2015 |
| Engaging in NDRTs affects drivers’ responses and glance patterns after silent automation failures T Louw, J Kuo, R Romano, V Radhakrishnan, MG Lenné, N Merat Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 62, 870-882, 2019 | 103 | 2019 |
| Handbook of human factors for automated, connected, and intelligent vehicles DL Fisher, WJ Horrey, JD Lee, MA Regan CRC Press, 2020 | 61 | 2020 |
| Physiological indicators of driver workload during car-following scenarios and takeovers in highly automated driving V Radhakrishnan, N Merat, T Louw, RC Gonçalves, G Torrao, W Lyu, ... Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 87, 149-163, 2022 | 59 | 2022 |
| Physiological indicators of driver workload during car-following scenarios and takeovers in highly automated driving V Radhakrishnan, N Merat, T Louw, RC Gonçalves, G Torrao, W Lyu, ... Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 2022 | 59 | 2022 |
| Why would people want to travel more with automated cars? E Lehtonen, F Malin, T Louw, YM Lee, T Itkonen, S Innamaa Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 89, 143-154, 2022 | 54 | 2022 |
| The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers’ lane changing behaviour R Madigan, T Louw, N Merat PloS one 13 (2), e0192190, 2018 | 53 | 2018 |
| Gaze-based Intention Anticipation over Driving Manoeuvres in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles M Wu, T Louw, L Morteza, W Ruan, X Huang, N Merat, M Kwiatkowska Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent …, 2019 | 45 | 2019 |
Natasha MeratUniversity of LeedsVerified email at its.leeds.ac.uk
