| Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle N Merat, AH Jamson, FCH Lai, M Daly, OMJ Carsten Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 27, 274-282, 2014 | 901 | 2014 |
| What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems R Madigan, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, N Merat Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 50, 55-64, 2017 | 671 | 2017 |
| Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state N Merat, AH Jamson, FCH Lai, O Carsten Human factors 54 (5), 762-771, 2012 | 558 | 2012 |
| Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions AH Jamson, N Merat, OMJ Carsten, FCH Lai Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 30, 116-125, 2013 | 489 | 2013 |
| Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? O Carsten, FCH Lai, Y Barnard, AH Jamson, N Merat Human factors 54 (5), 747-761, 2012 | 479 | 2012 |
| Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model R Madigan, T Louw, M Dziennus, T Graindorge, E Ortega, M Graindorge, ... Transportation Research Procedia 14, 2217-2226, 2016 | 471 | 2016 |
| A human factors perspective on automated driving M Kyriakidis, JCF de Winter, N Stanton, T Bellet, B van Arem, K Brookhuis, ... Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 20 (3), 223-249, 2019 | 432 | 2019 |
| The “Out-of-the-Loop” concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications N Merat, B Seppelt, T Louw, J Engström, JD Lee, E Johansson, CA Green, ... Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1), 87-98, 2019 | 360 | 2019 |
| Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: The cognitive control hypothesis J Engström, G Markkula, T Victor, N Merat Human factors 59 (5), 734-764, 2017 | 356 | 2017 |
| Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries S Nordhoff, T Louw, S Innamaa, E Lehtonen, A Beuster, G Torrao, ... Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 74, 280-297, 2020 | 343 | 2020 |
| User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study S Nordhoff, J de Winter, R Madigan, N Merat, B van Arem, R Happee Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 58, 843-854, 2018 | 335 | 2018 |
| Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving AH Jamson, N Merat Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8 (2), 79-96, 2005 | 328 | 2005 |
| Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations A Schieben, M Wilbrink, C Kettwich, R Madigan, T Louw, N Merat Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1), 69-85, 2019 | 321 | 2019 |
| Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic G Markkula, R Madigan, D Nathanael, E Portouli, YM Lee, A Dietrich, ... Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21 (6), 728-752, 2020 | 283 | 2020 |
| Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation T Louw, N Merat Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 76, 35-50, 2017 | 277 | 2017 |
| What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? N Merat, T Louw, R Madigan, M Wilbrink, A Schieben Accident Analysis & Prevention 118, 244-252, 2018 | 263 | 2018 |
| The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: Comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies J Santos, N Merat, S Mouta, K Brookhuis, D De Waard Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8 (2), 135-146, 2005 | 224 | 2005 |
| Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives W Tabone, J De Winter, C Ackermann, J Bärgman, M Baumann, S Deb, ... Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives 9, 100293, 2021 | 220 | 2021 |
| Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles YM Lee, R Madigan, O Giles, L Garach-Morcillo, G Markkula, C Fox, ... Cognition, Technology & Work 23 (2), 367-380, 2021 | 217 | 2021 |
| Pedestrian models for autonomous driving part ii: high-level models of human behavior F Camara, N Bellotto, S Cosar, F Weber, D Nathanael, M Althoff, J Wu, ... IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (9), 5453-5472, 2020 | 197 | 2020 |
Ruth MadiganResearch Fellow, University of LeedsVerified email at leeds.ac.uk
