| What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems R Madigan, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, N Merat Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 50, 55-64, 2017 | 671 | 2017 |
| Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model R Madigan, T Louw, M Dziennus, T Graindorge, E Ortega, M Graindorge, ... Transportation Research Procedia 14, 2217-2226, 2016 | 471 | 2016 |
| User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study S Nordhoff, J de Winter, R Madigan, N Merat, B van Arem, R Happee Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 58, 843-854, 2018 | 335 | 2018 |
| Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations A Schieben, M Wilbrink, C Kettwich, R Madigan, T Louw, N Merat Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1), 69-85, 2019 | 321 | 2019 |
| Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic G Markkula, R Madigan, D Nathanael, E Portouli, YM Lee, A Dietrich, ... Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21 (6), 728-752, 2020 | 283 | 2020 |
| What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? N Merat, T Louw, R Madigan, M Wilbrink, A Schieben Accident Analysis & Prevention 118, 244-252, 2018 | 263 | 2018 |
| Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles YM Lee, R Madigan, O Giles, L Garach-Morcillo, G Markkula, C Fox, ... Cognition, Technology & Work 23 (2), 367-380, 2021 | 217 | 2021 |
| Application of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to UK rail safety of the line incidents R Madigan, D Golightly, R Madders Accident Analysis & Prevention 97, 122-131, 2016 | 168 | 2016 |
| Coming back into the loop: Drivers’ perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving T Louw, G Markkula, E Boer, R Madigan, O Carsten, N Merat Accident Analysis & Prevention 108, 9-18, 2017 | 155 | 2017 |
| Human factors, user requirements, and user acceptance of ride-sharing in automated vehicles N Merat, R Madigan, S Nordhoff International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 2017 | 143 | 2017 |
| Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian’crossing behavior YM Lee, R Madigan, C Uzondu, J Garcia, R Romano, G Markkula, ... Journal of safety research 80, 270-280, 2022 | 135 | 2022 |
| Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis R Madigan, S Nordhoff, C Fox, RE Amini, T Louw, M Wilbrink, A Schieben, ... Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 66, 196-213, 2019 | 135 | 2019 |
| Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential T Louw, R Madigan, O Carsten, N Merat Injury prevention 23 (4), 281-286, 2017 | 127 | 2017 |
| External human–machine interfaces can be misleading: an examination of trust development and misuse in a CAVE-based pedestrian simulation environment AA Kaleefathullah, N Merat, YM Lee, YB Eisma, R Madigan, J Garcia, ... Human factors 64 (6), 1070-1085, 2022 | 126 | 2022 |
| When should the chicken cross the road C Fox, F Camara, G Markkula, R Romano, R Madigan, N Merat Game theory for autonomous vehicle-human interactions, 2018 | 94 | 2018 |
| User acceptance of driverless shuttles running in an open and mixed traffic environment S Nordhoff, B Van Arem, N Merat, R Madigan, L Ruhrort, A Knie, ... 12th ITS European Congress, 19-22, 2017 | 89 | 2017 |
| Drivers display anger‐congruent attention to potential traffic hazards AN Stephens, SL Trawley, R Madigan, JA Groeger Applied cognitive psychology 27 (2), 178-189, 2013 | 89 | 2013 |
| Explaining unsafe pedestrian road crossing behaviours using a psychophysics-based gap acceptance model K Tian, G Markkula, C Wei, YM Lee, R Madigan, N Merat, R Romano Safety science 154, 105837, 2022 | 84 | 2022 |
| Models of human decision-making as tools for estimating and optimizing impacts of vehicle automation G Markkula, R Romano, R Madigan, CW Fox, OT Giles, N Merat Transportation research record 2672 (37), 153-163, 2018 | 80 | 2018 |
| Understanding the messages conveyed by automated vehicles YM Lee, R Madigan, J Garcia, A Tomlinson, A Solernou, R Romano, ... Proceedings of the 11th international conference on automotive user …, 2019 | 79 | 2019 |
