| Logics for defeasible argumentation H Prakken, G Vreeswijk Handbook of philosophical logic, 219-318, 2002 | 969 | 2002 |
| Abstract argumentation systems GAW Vreeswijk Artificial intelligence 90 (1-2), 225-279, 1997 | 525 | 1997 |
| Towards an argument interchange format C Chesnevar, S Modgil, I Rahwan, C Reed, G Simari, M South, ... The knowledge engineering review 21 (4), 293-316, 2006 | 510 | 2006 |
| Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics GAW Vreeswijk, H Prakken European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 239-253, 2000 | 250 | 2000 |
| A critical review of argument visualization tools: Do users become better reasoners? SW van den Braak, H Oostendorp, H Prakken, GAW Vreeswijk Workshop notes of the ECAI-06 workshop on computational models of natural …, 2008 | 112 | 2008 |
| Towards a testbed for multi-party dialogues FPM Dignum, GAW Vreeswijk Workshop on Agent Communication Languages, 212-230, 2003 | 94 | 2003 |
| Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? F Bex, S Van den Braak, H Van Oostendorp, H Prakken, B Verheij, ... Law, Probability & Risk 6 (1-4), 145-168, 2007 | 90 | 2007 |
| An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems GAW Vreeswijk Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 109, 2006 | 76 | 2006 |
| Argumentation in Bayesian belief networks GAW Vreeswijk International workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, 111-129, 2004 | 71 | 2004 |
| Defeasible dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach towards defeasible argumentation G Vreeswijk Journal of Logic and Computation 3 (3), 317-334, 1993 | 69 | 1993 |
| Practical reasoning using values: Giving meaning to values TL van der Weide, F Dignum, JJC Meyer, H Prakken, GAW Vreeswijk International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 79-93, 2009 | 64 | 2009 |
| A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues EM Kok, JJC Meyer, H Prakken, GAW Vreeswijk International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 31-48, 2010 | 53 | 2010 |
| The Feasibility of Defeat in Defeasible Reasoning. G Vreeswijk KR 91, 526-534, 1991 | 53 | 1991 |
| Final review and report on formal argumentation system L Amgoud, L Bodenstaff, M Caminada, S McBurney, H Prakken, J Veenen, ... ASPIC Consortium, 2006 | 46 | 2006 |
| Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 4, chapter Logics for Defeasible Argumentation H Prakken, G Vreeswijk Kluwer Academic 2, 218-319, 2002 | 44 | 2002 |
| IACAS: an implementation of Chisholm’s principles of knowledge GAW Vreeswijk The proceedings of the 2nd Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning …, 1995 | 44 | 1995 |
| Dungine: A java dung reasoner M South, G Vreeswijk, J Fox Computational Models of Argument, 360-368, 2008 | 40 | 2008 |
| Representation of formal dispute with astanding order GAW Vreeswijk Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2), 205-231, 2000 | 40* | 2000 |
| Argue tuProlog: A lightweight argumentation engine for agent applications D Bryant, PJ Krause, G Vreeswijk COMMA 144, 27-32, 2006 | 37 | 2006 |
| Studies in defeasible argumentation GAW Vreeswijk | 36 | 1993 |
Henry PrakkenDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityVerified email at cs.uu.nl
