| Handbook of argumentation theory JHM van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E.C.W., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F ... Dordrecht: Springer, 2014 | 1524* | 2014 |
| A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence Z Akata, D Balliet, M De Rijke, F Dignum, V Dignum, G Eiben, A Fokkens, ... Computer 53 (8), 18-28, 2020 | 586 | 2020 |
| Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages B Verheij Proc. NAIC 96 (357-368), 1.2-1.2, 1996 | 345 | 1996 |
| A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law T Bench-Capon, M Araszkiewicz, K Ashley, K Atkinson, F Bex, F Borges, ... Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3), 215-319, 2012 | 287 | 2012 |
| Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme B Verheij Argumentation 19 (3), 347-371, 2005 | 250 | 2005 |
| Rules, reasons, arguments: formal studies of argumentation and defeat B Verheij Formal studies of argumentation and defeat, Doctorial dissetation …, 1996 | 240 | 1996 |
| Rules, Reasons, Arguments: formal studies of argumentation and defeat B Verheij Universiteit Maastricht, 1996 | 240 | 1996 |
| Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic B Verheij Artificial intelligence and Law 11 (2), 167-195, 2003 | 230 | 2003 |
| Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation B Verheij Artificial intelligence 150 (1-2), 291-324, 2003 | 217 | 2003 |
| Deflog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions B Verheij Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (3), 319-346, 2003 | 209 | 2003 |
| A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence FJ Bex, PJ Van Koppen, H Prakken, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2), 123-152, 2010 | 190 | 2010 |
| Arguing on the Toulmin model D Hitchcock, B Verheij Arguing on the Toulmin Model 10, 2006 | 186 | 2006 |
| How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study H De Weerd, R Verbrugge, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence 199, 67-92, 2013 | 153 | 2013 |
| Virtual arguments: on the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers B Verheij TMC Asser Press, 2005 | 136 | 2005 |
| Negotiating with other minds: the role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information H De Weerd, R Verbrugge, B Verheij Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 31 (2), 250-287, 2017 | 117 | 2017 |
| A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios CS Vlek, H Prakken, S Renooij, B Verheij Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (3), 285-324, 2016 | 111 | 2016 |
| Automated argument assistance for lawyers B Verheij Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial intelligence …, 1999 | 110 | 1999 |
| Artificial intelligence as law B Verheij Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2), 181-206, 2020 | 102 | 2020 |
| A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks ST Timmer, JJC Meyer, H Prakken, S Renooij, B Verheij International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 80, 475-494, 2017 | 101 | 2017 |
| An integrated view on rules and principles B Verheij, JC Hage, HJ Van Den Herik Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1), 3-26, 1998 | 100 | 1998 |
Henry PrakkenDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityVerified email at cs.uu.nl
