[go: up one dir, main page]

US2831574A - Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores - Google Patents

Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2831574A
US2831574A US397372A US39737253A US2831574A US 2831574 A US2831574 A US 2831574A US 397372 A US397372 A US 397372A US 39737253 A US39737253 A US 39737253A US 2831574 A US2831574 A US 2831574A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
ore
pulp
concentrate
collector
magnesium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US397372A
Inventor
Arthur J Weinig
James F Mcintosh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Basic Inc
Original Assignee
Basic Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Basic Inc filed Critical Basic Inc
Priority to US397372A priority Critical patent/US2831574A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2831574A publication Critical patent/US2831574A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/01Organic compounds containing nitrogen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/008Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/02Collectors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores
    • B03D2203/04Non-sulfide ores

Definitions

  • Magnesite ores have in the past been subjected to froth flotation to purify the ore sufiiciently for the production of metallic magnesium.
  • considerable care has been required to eliminate, insofar as possible, the naturally occurring impurities, such as silica compounds, limestone, alumina compounds, and the like, with the result that the cost of the process has necessarily been relatively high.
  • the cost of these processes is further accentuated by the grinding characteristics of the material which are such as to yield appreciable quantities of ultra-fine material which must be eliminated, as by scalping, prior to froth flotation if excessive reagent consummation is to be avoided.
  • This type of ore is low in lime, and may contain substantial amounts of brucite.
  • magnesite ores contain dolomite as the principal contaminant.
  • the large amounts of brucite substantially change the characteristics of the ore, especially as to flotation beneficiation. The normal procedures for the purification of magnesite are not satisfactory for the brucite-magnesite ores.
  • One of the principal objects of our invention is the provision of an inexpensive process and collector reagents for treating low grade brucite-magnesite ore in such manner as' to yield a concentrate suitable for use in the fabrication of refractories.
  • Another important object of our invention is to provide 2,8315% Patented Apr. 22, 1958 ice i collector reagents for use in the process of the type described which are relatively insensitive to the presence of slimes or ultra-fine particles.
  • a further object of our invention is the provision of a process of the type described, wherein a substantial por tion of the impurities naturally present are eliminated, and some being allowed to remain with the concentrate to assist in the formation of a binder for the refractory composition during subsequent processing.
  • Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a suitable flow sheet incorporating our invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a modified form of flow sheet incorporating our invention.
  • the ore in one form of the invention, we grind our ore, which is mined in Nye County, Nevada, to approximately minus 200 mesh.
  • the ore must be finely ground so as to separate the impurities.
  • One impurity is serpentine which is dispersed throughout the ore, and only by grinding to such fine sizes will the process be eflicient, economical, and provide a high yield.
  • the ore is ground to minus 200 mesh, which provides for substantial separation of the constituents of the ore.
  • the grind to minus 200 mesh gives substantial quantities of ground ore which is about 300 mesh or finer. Since the brucitemagnesite ore is very soft, the grinding is easy.
  • a pulp of the ground ore is then subjected to a mild froth flotation treatment which eliminates from the pulp the easily floated portion of the siliceous contaminants such as the various forms of talc and chloritic minerals.
  • a magnesium material collector reagent preferably by stages, a magnesium material collector reagent, and subject the pulp to froth flotation, with the result that a refractory grade magnesium material, together with a small proportionof silica is concentrated in the froth overflow.
  • the excess silica contaminant which isusually in granular form, and the excess calcite, dolomite, etc. and a small amount of magnesite is discharged from the froth flotation stages as tailings.
  • the quantities of calcium and silica-bearing contaminants collected in the concentrate may be controlled in such manner that they willpermit additions and adjustments to form a suitable binder for the refractory during subsequent processing.
  • the ore, after grinding, may be classified prior to froth flotation and only the classifier underflow is subjected to froth flotation, since it has been found that in some ores the classifier overflow is high enough in silicon dioxide forrejection as a tailing.
  • the magnesium material flotation stage may be divided into primary and scavenger units separated by a classifier. The overflow or fines of this classifier may be discharged from the system without further processing, while the underflow, containing the relatively coarser particles, is subjected to further froth flotation in the scavenger unit, the concentrate from this unit being recycled to the primary flotation cells and the underflow discharged as tailings from the process.
  • Fig. 1 a typical flow sheet, wherein brucite-magnesite ore of the type obtained near the town of Gabbs in Nye County, Nevada, is fed in conventional manner to a ball mill 10 with water and discharged into a suitable Dorr or Akins classifier 11, wherein the ore pulp is classified into a coarse fraction and a fine fraction. If brucite is present in the ore, the pulp will have a pH .of about 8.5. The portion of the ore coarser than approximately 200 mesh is recycled through the ball mill 10, while the minus 200'mesh fraction is discharged from the classifier 11 to a second classifier 12, which is a hydro separator or a bowl classifier.
  • a second classifier 12 which is a hydro separator or a bowl classifier.
  • the classifier 12 divides the ore into two approximately equal portions, one portion being plus about 300 mesh and the other being minus about 300 mesh.
  • the coarser, or plus 300 mesh is discharged into a primary coarse brucite-magnesite froth flotation unit 13, it being understood that each froth flotation unit may include several cells.
  • a suitable brucite-magnesite collector reagent is added to the pulp, preferably by stages during passage of the pulp through the primary flotation unit 13, with the result that the relatively coarse brucite-magnesite particles are collected and concentrated in the froth overflow of the flotation unit 13.
  • the underflow or tailings from the primary flotation cells 13 is discharged through a scavenger flotation unit 14 of similar design, where additional magnesium material collector reagent may be added. Most of the remaining magnesium material is concentrated in the froth overflow of the flotation cells 14 and are recycled for passage through the primary unit 13 in conventional manner. The underflow from the unit 14 is discharged from the system as tailing reject.
  • the overflow of the classifier 12 is passed through a silica froth flotation unit 16, limited quantities of a suitable silica collector reagent being added, preferably by stages, in this operation.
  • the effect of this flotation stage is to concentrate in the froth overflow of the unit 16 the easily floated portions of the silica contaminants naturally present in the ore and which concentrate largely in the overflow of the classifier 12.
  • These easily floated particles are usually silica minerals having a relatively flaky, rather than granular, form, and include the various talc and some chloritic minerals commonly encountered in the type of ore described.
  • the underflow from the flotation unit 16 contains the magnesite values and is discharged into a fine magnesite froth flotation unit 17, where suitable magnesite collector reagents are added, preferably by stages.
  • This stage of the operation concentrates in the froth overflow the magnesium minerals in the fine portion of the ore. It will be found, however, that the brucitemagnesite collector reagent employed also collects and floats a small proportion of the calcium-bearing minerals naturally present. Calcium carbonate, or calcite, and dolomite are the predominant minerals in this category. Also since the pulp contains limited quantities of the silica collector reagent added in the unit 16, it will be found that a small quantity of silica is also incorporated in the froth concentrate.
  • the calcium-bearing and silica-bearing minerals incorporated in the overflow from the unit 17 will be in such proportion as to permit adjustments and additions to form a suitable binder during future processing of the concentrate.
  • the underflow from the unit 17 contains the unfloated silicabearing minerals of the fine fraction of the ground ore, these usually being granular in nature, together with a certain amount of dolomite, calcite, and other impurities and are discharged as a reject tailing.
  • Fig. 2 we have illustrated a somewhat modified process, wherein ore of the type described is fed in conventional manner to a ball mill 18 and discharged as an aqueous pulp into a classifier 19, similar to classifier 11.
  • the classifier 19 may be operated in such manner as to recycle plus 325 mesh ore particles to the ball mill 18 for further grinding, While the underflow from the classifier 19 is discharged to a silica froth flotation unit 21, similar to the unit 16, previously described.
  • a suitable silica collector reagent is added at this point, preferably by stages, and the easily floated portion of the silica contaminants present in the ore discharged as a froth reject from the flotation unit 21.
  • the underflow from theunit, 21 contains a substantial portion of the Fire p int F silica contaminants present, together with the brucitemagnesite ore and the calcium-bearing minerals.
  • This underflow is discharged to a primary magnesium material froth flotation unit 22, where suitable collector reagents are added, preferably by stages.
  • the magnesium values are thereby concentrated in the froth overflow from the flotation unit 22, together with a portion of the silica and calcium-bearing mineral contaminants present in the ore, this portion of the operation being somewhat similar to the operation of the froth flotation unit 17 previously described.
  • the underflow from the flotation cell 22 is discharged into a classifier 23, which is operated in such manner that the coarse particles are discharged into a scavenger magnesium material froth flotalion cell 24 for further treatment.
  • the overflow from the classifier 23 consists predominantly of silicate minerals and other impurities suitable for discharge from the system as tailing reject.
  • Froth concentrate produced by the scavenger battery 24 contains most of the remaining brucite-magnesite ore particles, the underflow consists of undesirable impurities suitable for discharge from the process at railings.
  • the froth concentrate from the scavenger flotation unit 24 is recycled through the unit 22 in conventional manner.
  • the collector is a combination of cresylic acid (usually derived from petroleum sources) and certain high molecular weight aliphatic ammonium acetates; the first of which is known as Aquaquad 12, which is a lauryl trimethyl ammonium acetate.
  • Another collector reagent suitable for the combination is an amine and has a general chemical formula RNH acetate, in which R represents the rosin acids derived from tall oil.
  • Armac S is a variable composition and consists of the various saturated and unsaturated fatty acids derived from soy beans and reacted with ammonia to form amines after which the amines are reacted with acetic acid to form the corresponding acetate.
  • the collector reagents suitable for use in the magnesium material flotation stages include a reagent known as Armour Neo Fat S142, essentially a refined tall oil product of somewhat variable composition. A typical analysis of this reagent indicates the following approximate composition:
  • This composition similar to Neo Fat S142, contains abietic, linoleic, and linolenic acids, usable directly or in saponified form.
  • the characteristics of this reagent are substantially as follows:
  • napthenic acids may also be employed as collector reagents for magnesium materials.
  • cresylic acid or a suitable substitute may be employed as a frother.
  • the collector reagent for the silica may be varied to suit the particular batch of ore being processed.
  • the amine acetate may be used in amounts from 0.10 to 0.75 pound per ton of head ore, and the cresylic acid may also be varied from about 0.10 to 0.75 pound 'per ton of head ore.
  • the magnesium material collector may be used in amounts of 0.30 to 5.0 pound per ton, determined by the requirements of the ore.
  • the Mg concentrate will yield a calcine of 3% Si0 or less since the insoluble matter is somewhat higher in value than pure SiO While specific examples have been utilized to fully de* scribe the invention, there is no intent to limit the scope thereof to the precise details so set forth, except insofar as defined by the following claims.

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

United States Patent G BENEFICIATION F LOW GRADE MAGNESITE ORES Arthur J. Weinig, Golden, and James F. McIntosh, Denver, Colo, assignors to Basic Incorporated, a corporation of Ohio Application December 10, 1953, Serial No. 397,372 8 Claims. (Cl. 209-466) Our invention relates to a process for the treatment of magnesium, refractory-type ores by froth flotation in such manner as to yield a concentrate suitable for use in formin refractory compositions.
Magnesite ores have in the past been subjected to froth flotation to purify the ore sufiiciently for the production of metallic magnesium. In such processes considerable care has been required to eliminate, insofar as possible, the naturally occurring impurities, such as silica compounds, limestone, alumina compounds, and the like, with the result that the cost of the process has necessarily been relatively high. The cost of these processes is further accentuated by the grinding characteristics of the material which are such as to yield appreciable quantities of ultra-fine material which must be eliminated, as by scalping, prior to froth flotation if excessive reagent consummation is to be avoided.
According to the present invention We have discovered an economical, efiicient process for treating low grade magnesium refractory-type ores. Such ores are of the brucite-magnesite type which are soft, easily ground, and contain such siliceous impurities as serpentine, feldspar, mica, silica, talc, etc. Our process refines the low grade ore to produce a calcined magnesium refractory containing less than about five percent silica. A minor amount, i. e., less than five percent, and preferably l2 /2%, of silica is not detrimental in the calcine, since a certain amount of silica to form a frit is required. Higher siliceous contaminants, however, are detrimental and must be removed to provide a satisfactory refractory from such low grade ore. In calcining, about half the weight is lost as carbon dioxide and Water. Thus if head ore is calcined the sinter would run about 6% silicon dioxide, or in instances, even more.
A typical analysis of the low grade ores is:
Percent Si0 3.0 CaO 3.5 MgO 40.0 R 0 1.0 HClO insoluble 3.5 Water and carbon dioxide; "Balance Note that the perchloric acid insoluble amount includes the silicon dioxide amount already listed. This type of ore is low in lime, and may contain substantial amounts of brucite. Generally, magnesite ores contain dolomite as the principal contaminant. The large amounts of brucite substantially change the characteristics of the ore, especially as to flotation beneficiation. The normal procedures for the purification of magnesite are not satisfactory for the brucite-magnesite ores.
One of the principal objects of our invention is the provision of an inexpensive process and collector reagents for treating low grade brucite-magnesite ore in such manner as' to yield a concentrate suitable for use in the fabrication of refractories.
Another important object of our invention is to provide 2,8315% Patented Apr. 22, 1958 ice i collector reagents for use in the process of the type described which are relatively insensitive to the presence of slimes or ultra-fine particles.
A further object of our invention is the provision of a process of the type described, wherein a substantial por tion of the impurities naturally present are eliminated, and some being allowed to remain with the concentrate to assist in the formation of a binder for the refractory composition during subsequent processing. 1
Additional objects of our invention, which refer to various novel reagents and methods of treatment, Will be disclosed in the following detailed description and in the appended drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a suitable flow sheet incorporating our invention; and
Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a modified form of flow sheet incorporating our invention.
In one form of the invention, we grind our ore, which is mined in Nye County, Nevada, to approximately minus 200 mesh. The ore must be finely ground so as to separate the impurities. One impurity is serpentine which is dispersed throughout the ore, and only by grinding to such fine sizes will the process be eflicient, economical, and provide a high yield. Preferably, the ore is ground to minus 200 mesh, which provides for substantial separation of the constituents of the ore. The grind to minus 200 mesh gives substantial quantities of ground ore which is about 300 mesh or finer. Since the brucitemagnesite ore is very soft, the grinding is easy. A pulp of the ground ore is then subjected to a mild froth flotation treatment which eliminates from the pulp the easily floated portion of the siliceous contaminants such as the various forms of talc and chloritic minerals. We then add to the pulp, preferably by stages, a magnesium material collector reagent, and subject the pulp to froth flotation, with the result that a refractory grade magnesium material, together with a small proportionof silica is concentrated in the froth overflow. The excess silica contaminant, which isusually in granular form, and the excess calcite, dolomite, etc. and a small amount of magnesite is discharged from the froth flotation stages as tailings. By proper control of reagent addition and processing, the quantities of calcium and silica-bearing contaminants collected in the concentratemay be controlled in such manner that they willpermit additions and adjustments to form a suitable binder for the refractory during subsequent processing.
If desired, the ore, after grinding, may be classified prior to froth flotation and only the classifier underflow is subjected to froth flotation, since it has been found that in some ores the classifier overflow is high enough in silicon dioxide forrejection as a tailing. Also, if desired, the magnesium material flotation stage may be divided into primary and scavenger units separated by a classifier. The overflow or fines of this classifier may be discharged from the system without further processing, while the underflow, containing the relatively coarser particles, is subjected to further froth flotation in the scavenger unit, the concentrate from this unit being recycled to the primary flotation cells and the underflow discharged as tailings from the process.
Referring to the drawings, we have illustrated in Fig. 1 a typical flow sheet, wherein brucite-magnesite ore of the type obtained near the town of Gabbs in Nye County, Nevada, is fed in conventional manner to a ball mill 10 with water and discharged into a suitable Dorr or Akins classifier 11, wherein the ore pulp is classified into a coarse fraction and a fine fraction. If brucite is present in the ore, the pulp will have a pH .of about 8.5. The portion of the ore coarser than approximately 200 mesh is recycled through the ball mill 10, while the minus 200'mesh fraction is discharged from the classifier 11 to a second classifier 12, which is a hydro separator or a bowl classifier.
The classifier 12 divides the ore into two approximately equal portions, one portion being plus about 300 mesh and the other being minus about 300 mesh. The coarser, or plus 300 mesh, is discharged into a primary coarse brucite-magnesite froth flotation unit 13, it being understood that each froth flotation unit may include several cells. A suitable brucite-magnesite collector reagent is added to the pulp, preferably by stages during passage of the pulp through the primary flotation unit 13, with the result that the relatively coarse brucite-magnesite particles are collected and concentrated in the froth overflow of the flotation unit 13.
The underflow or tailings from the primary flotation cells 13 is discharged through a scavenger flotation unit 14 of similar design, where additional magnesium material collector reagent may be added. Most of the remaining magnesium material is concentrated in the froth overflow of the flotation cells 14 and are recycled for passage through the primary unit 13 in conventional manner. The underflow from the unit 14 is discharged from the system as tailing reject.
The overflow of the classifier 12 is passed through a silica froth flotation unit 16, limited quantities of a suitable silica collector reagent being added, preferably by stages, in this operation. The effect of this flotation stage is to concentrate in the froth overflow of the unit 16 the easily floated portions of the silica contaminants naturally present in the ore and which concentrate largely in the overflow of the classifier 12. These easily floated particles are usually silica minerals having a relatively flaky, rather than granular, form, and include the various talc and some chloritic minerals commonly encountered in the type of ore described. The underflow from the flotation unit 16 contains the magnesite values and is discharged into a fine magnesite froth flotation unit 17, where suitable magnesite collector reagents are added, preferably by stages.
This stage of the operation concentrates in the froth overflow the magnesium minerals in the fine portion of the ore. It will be found, however, that the brucitemagnesite collector reagent employed also collects and floats a small proportion of the calcium-bearing minerals naturally present. Calcium carbonate, or calcite, and dolomite are the predominant minerals in this category. Also since the pulp contains limited quantities of the silica collector reagent added in the unit 16, it will be found that a small quantity of silica is also incorporated in the froth concentrate. When the quantity of collector reagent added in the unit 16 is properly gauged and the units 16 and 17 operated in accordance with the teachings of this invention, it will be found that the calcium-bearing and silica-bearing minerals incorporated in the overflow from the unit 17 will be in such proportion as to permit adjustments and additions to form a suitable binder during future processing of the concentrate. The underflow from the unit 17 contains the unfloated silicabearing minerals of the fine fraction of the ground ore, these usually being granular in nature, together with a certain amount of dolomite, calcite, and other impurities and are discharged as a reject tailing.
In Fig. 2, we have illustrated a somewhat modified process, wherein ore of the type described is fed in conventional manner to a ball mill 18 and discharged as an aqueous pulp into a classifier 19, similar to classifier 11.
In this process, the classifier 19 may be operated in such manner as to recycle plus 325 mesh ore particles to the ball mill 18 for further grinding, While the underflow from the classifier 19 is discharged to a silica froth flotation unit 21, similar to the unit 16, previously described.
A suitable silica collector reagent is added at this point, preferably by stages, and the easily floated portion of the silica contaminants present in the ore discharged as a froth reject from the flotation unit 21. The underflow from theunit, 21 contains a substantial portion of the Fire p int F silica contaminants present, together with the brucitemagnesite ore and the calcium-bearing minerals. This underflow is discharged to a primary magnesium material froth flotation unit 22, where suitable collector reagents are added, preferably by stages. The magnesium values are thereby concentrated in the froth overflow from the flotation unit 22, together with a portion of the silica and calcium-bearing mineral contaminants present in the ore, this portion of the operation being somewhat similar to the operation of the froth flotation unit 17 previously described.
In this instance, however, the underflow from the flotation cell 22 is discharged into a classifier 23, which is operated in such manner that the coarse particles are discharged into a scavenger magnesium material froth flotalion cell 24 for further treatment. The overflow from the classifier 23 consists predominantly of silicate minerals and other impurities suitable for discharge from the system as tailing reject.
Froth concentrate produced by the scavenger battery 24 contains most of the remaining brucite-magnesite ore particles, the underflow consists of undesirable impurities suitable for discharge from the process at railings. The froth concentrate from the scavenger flotation unit 24 is recycled through the unit 22 in conventional manner.
We have discovered a new collector for silica, which is elficient and yet inexpensive in the process for recovering magnesium values from low grade brucite-magnesite ores. The collector is a combination of cresylic acid (usually derived from petroleum sources) and certain high molecular weight aliphatic ammonium acetates; the first of which is known as Aquaquad 12, which is a lauryl trimethyl ammonium acetate. Another collector reagent suitable for the combination is an amine and has a general chemical formula RNH acetate, in which R represents the rosin acids derived from tall oil. Still another suitable reagent for use in our collector is commercially known as Armac S, which is a variable composition and consists of the various saturated and unsaturated fatty acids derived from soy beans and reacted with ammonia to form amines after which the amines are reacted with acetic acid to form the corresponding acetate.
The collector reagents suitable for use in the magnesium material flotation stages include a reagent known as Armour Neo Fat S142, essentially a refined tall oil product of somewhat variable composition. A typical analysis of this reagent indicates the following approximate composition:
Oleic acid percent 46.0 Linoleic acid do 39.0 Linolenic acid do- 3.0 Rosin acid n do- 12.0 Mean molecular weight 295.2 Iodine value (Wijs) 130.0 Neutralization value 190.0
Other aliphatic carboxylic acids may be used, the choice being largely economical. The tall oil product is currently less expensive than other suitable fats or oils. If combined with a suitable frother, pure forms of the acids indicated above may be employed as magnesite collector reageants. The cost of such acids, however, is excessive and their use therefore is not feasible industrially.
Another tall oil derivative, commercially known as Triple Distilled Indusoil, may also be employed as a magnesium material flotation reagent. This composition, similar to Neo Fat S142, contains abietic, linoleic, and linolenic acids, usable directly or in saponified form. The characteristics of this reagent are substantially as follows:
Specific gravity at F 0.96-0.98 Saybolt viscosity at 210F 50-70 Flash point F 350-380 asents r i Acid number 180 Saponification number 181 Fatty acids approximately percent- 57 Rosin acids approximately do 33 In addition to the above-described reagents, napthenic acids may also be employed as collector reagents for magnesium materials. In the magnesium material flotation, cresylic acid or a suitable substitute may be employed as a frother. The collector reagent for the silica may be varied to suit the particular batch of ore being processed. In general, the amine acetate may be used in amounts from 0.10 to 0.75 pound per ton of head ore, and the cresylic acid may also be varied from about 0.10 to 0.75 pound 'per ton of head ore. The magnesium material collector may be used in amounts of 0.30 to 5.0 pound per ton, determined by the requirements of the ore.
To illustrate the specific application of these reagents and the flow sheets illustrated, a series of tests were run utilizing the arrangement disclosed in Fig. 1. In these tests, Aquaquad 12 in the amount of about 0.18 pound per ton of head ore were fed to the flotation unit 16 of Fig. l in stages, together with about 0.16 pound per ton of cresylic acid. About 0.15 pound of Neo Fat S142 per ton of ore were fed to the flotation unit 17. About 0.32 pound of Neo Fat S142 per ton of ore were fed to the flotation unit 13 in two equal stages, and 0.35 pound per ton of ore of the same reagent were added in two stages to the scavenger unit 14. The results of the beneficiation were as follows:
Table I Percent Percent weight 1 Con. Acid Tail Insoluble Ball Mill Classifier Overtlw 100.0 3. 31 Akins Classifier Course. 53. 6 2. 89 Akins Classifier Fines 46. 4 3. 42 Coarse Concentrate 46. 3 1. 37 Coarse Tails 7. 3 11. 52 Fines Froth Rejects... 7. 3 7.00 7. 3 Fines Concentrate 30. 0 1. 73 Fines Tails 9.1 6. 94 9.1 Calculated Total Concentrate 76. 3 1. 51 Calculated Total Tails 23.7 8. 38
1 By timed sample.
Similarly, the following amounts of reagent were added as indicated in the circuit shown in Fig. 2. About 0.40 pound and about 0.11 pound of RNH acetate (where R represents rosin acids) and cresylic acids, respectively, per ton of head ore is added to the pulp in the scalper circuit 21. The magnesium material in the primary circuit 22 is floated by adding about 0.25 pound of Triple Distilled Indusoil per ton of ore, and, also, by adding about 0.43 pound of the Triple Distilled Indusoil to the scavenger circuit 24. The collector is added in three equal stages to the primary magnesium material circuit, and in two equal stages in the scavenger circuit. The results of the flotation are similar to the results shown in Table I, and are as follows:
The Mg concentrate will yield a calcine of 3% Si0 or less since the insoluble matter is somewhat higher in value than pure SiO While specific examples have been utilized to fully de* scribe the invention, there is no intent to limit the scope thereof to the precise details so set forth, except insofar as defined by the following claims.
We claim:
1. in the art of concentrating magnesium material from brucite-magnesite ores, the steps of reducing such an ore to a finely divided condition in which a substantial portion is in the size range of less than about 300 mesh, forming a free flowing pulp of said finely divided ore having a pH of about 3.5, subjecting said pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a silica collector reagent comprising crecylic acid and a high molecular weight aliphatic amine acetate for the froth flotation removal of a substantial portion of siliceous contaminants from the pulp, and subjecting the silica-depleted pulp to a second froth flotation treatment in the presence of a collector reagent for magnesium materials whereby to obtain a magnesium material concentrate containing about 1-2 /z% silica by weight.
2. In the art of concentrating magnesium material from brucite-magnesite ores, the steps of reducing the ore to a finely divided condition in which a substantial portion will be in the size range of less than about 300 mesh, forming a free flowing pulp of said finely divided ore having a pH of about 8.5, subjecting said pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a silica collector reagent comprising cresylic acid and a compound of the formula RNH Ac, where R is selected from lauryl trimethyl, and rosin acids for the removal of a substantial portion of siliceous contaminants of the pulp, and subjecting the silica-depleted pulp to a second froth flotation treatment in the presence of an aliphatic carboxylic acid as a collector reagent for magnesium material, whereby to obtain a magnesite concentrate containing 1-2 /z% silica by weight.
3. In the art of concentrating magnesium material from brucite-magnesite ores, the steps of reducing the ore to a finely divided condition in which a substantial portion will be in the size range of less than a free flowing pulp of said finely divided ore having a pH of about 8.5, subjecting said pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a silica collector reagent comprising cresylic acid and a compound of the formula RNH Ac, where R is selected from lauryl tri-methyl, and rosin acids for the removal of a substantial portion of siliceous contaminants of the pulp, and subjecting the silicadepleted pulp to a second froth flotation treatment in the presence of a tall oil as a collector reagent for magnesium material, whereby to obtain a magnesite concentrate containing 1-2 /2% silica by weight.
4. In the art of concentrating magnesium material from brucite-magnesite ores, the steps of reducing the ore to a finely divided condition in which a substantial portion will be in the size range of less than about 300 mesh, forming a free flowing pulp of said finely divided ore having a pH of about 8.5, subjecting said pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of an eflective amount of a silica collector reagent comprising cresylic acid and lauryl tri methyl ammonium acetate for the removal of a substantial portion of siliceous contaminants of the pulp, and subjecting the silica-depleted pulp to a second froth flotation treatment in the presence of a tall oil as a collector reagent for magnesium material, whereby to obtain a magnesite concentrate containing 12 /2% silica by weight.
5. In the art of concentrating magnesium materials from brucite-magnesite ores, the steps of grinding such an ore to provide a finely divided material, the major portion of which is less than about 200 mesh, forming a free flowing pulp of such material having a pH of about 8.5, classifying the pulp constituents into minus 300 mesh and plus 300 mesh portions, passing the plus 300 mesh pulp portion directly to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a high molecular-weight aliphatic acid compound about 300 mesh, forming 7 H as a collector reagent for magnesium material, passing the minus 300 mesh pulp portion to a scalper flotation treat ment in the presence of a collector reagent for siliceous contaminants comprising cresylic acid and R-NH Ac, wherein R is a high molecular weight aliphatic radical, for removal of a substantial portion of the siliceous contaminants, and subjecting the silica-depleted pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a high molecular weight aliphatic acid as a collector reagent for magnesium material.
6. In the art of concentrating magnesium values from brucite-rnagnesite ores, the steps of forming a free flowing pulp of such an ore ground approximately to minus 325 mesh and having a pH of about 8.5, subjecting such pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a collector reagent for siliceous matter comprising cresylic acid and a high molecular weight aliphatic amine acetate for removal of a substantial portion of the siliceous impurities of the ore, passing the silica-depleted pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a magnesium material collector reagent for removal of a magnesium material concentrate, subjecting the residual pulp of said flotation stage to a classification treatment for rejection of a fine tailings, subjecting the undertlow of said classification stage to a froth flotation in the presence of a magnesium material collector reagent, and returning the concentrate of said latter stage as part of the feed to said initial magnesium material flotation stage.
7. In the art of concentrating magnesium values from brucite-magnesium ores, the steps of forming a free flowing pulp of such an ore ground approximately to minus 325 mesh and having a pH of about 8.5, subjecting such pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a collector reagent for silica comprising cresylic acid and RNI-I acetate, wherein R is a high molecular weight aliphatic radical, for removal of a substantial portion of the siliceous content of the ore, passing the silica-depleted pulp to a froth flotation treatment in the presence of a high molecular weight aliphatic acid composition as a magnesium material collector reagent for removal of a magnesium material concentrate, subjecting the residual pulp of said flotation stage to a classification treatment for rejection of a fine tailings, subjecting the underflow of said classification stage to froth flotation in the presence of said magnesium material collector reagent, and returning the concentrate of said latter stage as part of the feed to said first magnesium material flotation stage.
8. The process of treating brucite-magnesium ores for the recovery of magnesium values as a concentrate of the treatment, which comprises forming an aqueous pulp of such an ore having a major portion of its solid content in a size range of about 3OO mesh, maintaining the circulating pulp. of the treatment at a pH of about 8.5, and subjecting said pulpto a two-stage flotation separation with cresylic acid and a higher molecular Weight, aliphatic amine introduced as a collector reagent in one stage of, said concentration so as to collect siliceous content of the ore as a froth concentrate of such a separation, and introducing a collector for the magnesium materials as a collector in another stage of said concentration so as to concentrate the magnesium values of the ore as a concentrate of said other stage.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Erickson Sept. 28, 1943 OTHER REFERENCES

Claims (1)

  1. 8. THE PROCESS OF TREATING BRUCITE-MAGNESIUM ORES FOR THE RECOVERY OF MAGNESIUM VALUES AS A CONCENTRATE OF THE TREATMENT, WHICH COMPRISES FORMING AN AQUEOUS PULP OF SUCH AN ORE HAVING A MAJOR PORTION OF ITS SOLID CONTENT IN A SIZE RANGE OF ABOUT -300 MESH, MAINTAINING THE CIRCULATING PULP OF THE TREATMENT AT A PH OF ABOUT 8.5, AND SUBJECTING SAID PULP TO A TWO-STAGE FLOTATION SEPARATION WITH CRESYLIC ACID AND A HIGHER MOLECULAR WEIGHT, ALIPHATIC AMINE INTRODUCED AS COLLECTOR REAGENT IN ONE STAGE OF SAID CONCENTRATION SO AS TO COLLECT SILICEOUS CONTENT OF THE ORE AS A FROTH CONCENTRATE OF SUCH A SEPARATION, AND INTRODUCING A COLLECTOR FOR THE MAGNESIUM MATERIALS AS A COLLECTOR IN ANOTHER STAGE OF SAID CONCENTRATION SO AS TO CONCENTRATE THE MAGNESIUM VALUES OF THE ORE AS A CONCENTRATE OF SAID OTHER STAGE.
US397372A 1953-12-10 1953-12-10 Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores Expired - Lifetime US2831574A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US397372A US2831574A (en) 1953-12-10 1953-12-10 Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US397372A US2831574A (en) 1953-12-10 1953-12-10 Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2831574A true US2831574A (en) 1958-04-22

Family

ID=23570917

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US397372A Expired - Lifetime US2831574A (en) 1953-12-10 1953-12-10 Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2831574A (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2970689A (en) * 1958-03-27 1961-02-07 Crucible Steel Co America Coal treating process
US3419140A (en) * 1966-05-11 1968-12-31 Basic Inc Selective flotation of dolomite away from magnesite
US3640382A (en) * 1970-02-04 1972-02-08 Basic Inc Flotation concentration of magnesite with emulsified collector reagents
US3830366A (en) * 1972-03-24 1974-08-20 American Cyanamid Co Mineral flotation with sulfosuccinamate and depressent
US3976251A (en) * 1973-12-19 1976-08-24 Financial Mining - Industrial And Shipping Corporation Separation of magnesite from its contaminants by reverse flotation
US20090044662A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2009-02-19 Kenichi Yakashiro Method for pretreating sintering material
WO2015076761A1 (en) * 2013-11-25 2015-05-28 Kümaş Manyezi̇t Sanayi̇ Anoni̇m Si̇rketi̇ Magnesite ore enrichment process
US20170128955A1 (en) * 2015-10-12 2017-05-11 Arizona Chemical Company, Llc Collector Compositions and Methods of Using Thereof
CN109206024A (en) * 2018-11-30 2019-01-15 嘉晨集团有限公司 A kind of preparation method producing highly-purity magnesite using low-grade magnesite as raw material
US10307770B2 (en) * 2008-01-15 2019-06-04 Ingevity South Carolina, Llc Method for the benificiation of coal

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2330479A (en) * 1940-04-05 1943-09-28 Chemical Construction Corp Beneficiation of low grade coal

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2330479A (en) * 1940-04-05 1943-09-28 Chemical Construction Corp Beneficiation of low grade coal

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2970689A (en) * 1958-03-27 1961-02-07 Crucible Steel Co America Coal treating process
US3419140A (en) * 1966-05-11 1968-12-31 Basic Inc Selective flotation of dolomite away from magnesite
US3640382A (en) * 1970-02-04 1972-02-08 Basic Inc Flotation concentration of magnesite with emulsified collector reagents
US3830366A (en) * 1972-03-24 1974-08-20 American Cyanamid Co Mineral flotation with sulfosuccinamate and depressent
US3976251A (en) * 1973-12-19 1976-08-24 Financial Mining - Industrial And Shipping Corporation Separation of magnesite from its contaminants by reverse flotation
US20090044662A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2009-02-19 Kenichi Yakashiro Method for pretreating sintering material
US8834596B2 (en) * 2005-05-10 2014-09-16 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Method for pretreating sintering material
US10307770B2 (en) * 2008-01-15 2019-06-04 Ingevity South Carolina, Llc Method for the benificiation of coal
WO2015076761A1 (en) * 2013-11-25 2015-05-28 Kümaş Manyezi̇t Sanayi̇ Anoni̇m Si̇rketi̇ Magnesite ore enrichment process
US20170128955A1 (en) * 2015-10-12 2017-05-11 Arizona Chemical Company, Llc Collector Compositions and Methods of Using Thereof
US10293345B2 (en) * 2015-10-12 2019-05-21 Kraton Chemical, Llc Collector compositions and methods of using thereof
CN109206024A (en) * 2018-11-30 2019-01-15 嘉晨集团有限公司 A kind of preparation method producing highly-purity magnesite using low-grade magnesite as raw material

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3502271A (en) Iron ore treating process
Angadi et al. A review of cassiterite beneficiation fundamentals and plant practices
US20150068956A1 (en) Method and apparatus for separation of molybdenite from pyrite containing copper-molybdenum ores
CN103381389A (en) Production technology for improving secondary recovery rate of tailings
US20130284642A1 (en) Method of beneficiation of phosphate
US4436616A (en) Process for the beneficiation of phosphate ores
US2831574A (en) Beneficiation of low grade magnesite ores
US2944666A (en) Ore beneficiation
US4192737A (en) Froth flotation of insoluble slimes from sylvinite ores
US3008655A (en) Beneficiation of potash ores
US3960715A (en) Cationic froth flotation process
US2914173A (en) Method of processing phosphate ore to recover metallic minerals
US2614692A (en) Recovery of metallic minerals from phosphate-silica ores containing minor amounts of the metallic minerals
US3430765A (en) Beneficiation of fluorspar ores
JP5811010B2 (en) Method of beneficiation of ores containing fine minerals
US3331505A (en) Flotation process for reagent removal
US2312387A (en) Froth flotation of acidic minerals
US3976251A (en) Separation of magnesite from its contaminants by reverse flotation
US3278028A (en) Flotation of mica
US3859208A (en) Flotation of lithium aluminosilicate ores
US2162525A (en) Flotation of fine oxide ore minerals
US2806598A (en) Froth flotation process
US2811254A (en) Method for the beneficiation of phosphate ores
US1968008A (en) Concentration of minerals
US2205503A (en) Concentration of comminuted materials from their mixtures