[go: up one dir, main page]

EP3595997B1 - Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3595997B1
EP3595997B1 EP18710470.8A EP18710470A EP3595997B1 EP 3595997 B1 EP3595997 B1 EP 3595997B1 EP 18710470 A EP18710470 A EP 18710470A EP 3595997 B1 EP3595997 B1 EP 3595997B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sensor
sensors
trigger
operating parameter
passenger transport
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18710470.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3595997A1 (fr
Inventor
Martin KUSSEROW
Reto Tschuppert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inventio AG
Original Assignee
Inventio AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Inventio AG filed Critical Inventio AG
Publication of EP3595997A1 publication Critical patent/EP3595997A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3595997B1 publication Critical patent/EP3595997B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
    • B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
    • B66B5/0031—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for safety reasons
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
    • B66B1/3415—Control system configuration and the data transmission or communication within the control system
    • B66B1/3446—Data transmission or communication within the control system
    • B66B1/3461—Data transmission or communication within the control system between the elevator control system and remote or mobile stations
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
    • B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for monitoring operating parameters in a passenger transport system according to claims 1 and 5.
  • the invention also relates to a correspondingly equipped passenger transport system and a method for retrofitting a passenger transport system.
  • the invention relates in particular to options for being able to efficiently monitor operating parameters in a passenger transport system remotely.
  • People transport systems such as elevators, escalators or moving walks are used to transport people and/or goods in a building or structure from one place to another.
  • the passenger transport system as a whole is permanently installed in the structure, but has components such as an elevator car that can be moved between floors or a conveyor stairway or conveyor walkway that can be moved all around, with the help of which passengers can be transported, for example.
  • provision can be made for operating parameters of the passenger transport system to be monitored continuously or repeatedly at certain time intervals. For example, it may be necessary to know a current operating state in order to be able to control or regulate it appropriately. It can also be advantageous or necessary to identify anomalies in the operating states at an early stage in order to be able to take measures to rectify them if necessary.
  • elevator car doors it can be advantageous to monitor whether elevator car doors open and close correctly, since anomalies with regard to such a closing function of the doors can impair both the safety of the elevator system and comfort for passengers.
  • elevator car doors that do not close properly can create a risk for passengers of being injured by the door or by an elevator moving off despite the door being improperly closed.
  • an elevator car door that does not move correctly can cause inconveniences such as annoying noises.
  • an operating parameter can be a physical variable which is present during operation of the passenger transport system and which may change in the course of the operation of the passenger transport system.
  • the operating parameters are usually monitored using components that are already integrated into the passenger transport system by the manufacturer.
  • the operating parameters can be monitored by monitoring control variables of a controller controlling the passenger transport system, in particular with regard to any anomalies.
  • sensors can be provided in the passenger transport system, with the aid of which operating parameters to be monitored can be measured.
  • Operating parameters can be, for example, currently flowing or averaged electrical currents to structural components such as electric motors or actuators in the passenger transport system, noises in or adjacent to the passenger transport system, current accelerations within components of the passenger transport system, temperatures in or adjacent to components of the passenger transport system, etc.
  • an existing passenger transport system can be retrofitted with a device that has, for example, a large number of sensors and a signal processing device for processing signals from the sensors, so that this device can be used to monitor operating parameters and, for example, to detect any anomalies at an early stage.
  • a central monitoring unit could receive and process signals from each of the multitude of sensors. It was generally intended that the sensors would either transmit signals continuously or repeatedly at short intervals to the monitoring unit, or that the monitoring unit would, for example, trigger one of the sensors in a targeted manner, i.e. instruct it to currently measure the operating variable to be monitored by it and send a corresponding measurement signal to the to transmit monitoring unit.
  • EP 1353868 B1 describes, for example, a method for monitoring the condition of an elevator's door mechanism and determining a need for maintenance.
  • the EP 3075692 A1 also describes a method for monitoring operating parameters in a passenger transport system in the form of an elevator.
  • a second sensor for checking whether there is actually no person in the elevator car of the elevator is only activated or triggered when a first sensor has detected with a high probability that the elevator car is empty.
  • a need for a method and/or a device for monitoring operating parameters of a passenger transport system in which such requirements are reduced.
  • a need to be able to use simple and/or inexpensive components such as sensors and/or data transmission technology in such a method or in such a device, preferably without reducing the quality of the monitoring of the operating parameters.
  • a need for a appropriately equipped passenger transport system and a method for retrofitting a passenger transport system may be a need for a method and/or a device for monitoring operating parameters of a passenger transport system.
  • a method for monitoring operating parameters in a passenger transport system according to claim 1 is proposed.
  • a device for monitoring operating parameters in a passenger transport system according to claim 5 is proposed.
  • a passenger transport system which has a device according to an embodiment of the second aspect of the invention.
  • a method for retrofitting a passenger transport system according to claim 12 is proposed.
  • the sensors either transmitted their sensor data continuously or at short time intervals to a signal processing device, so that this signal processing device had to process large amounts of transmitted sensor data centrally.
  • the signal processing device could centrally control each of the sensors individually in order to cause it (i.e. to trigger it) to generate sensor data relating to the operating parameter to be recorded by it and forward it to the signal processing device.
  • a high data processing effort or a high effort for the control of the different sensors can arise.
  • This can require the signal processing device to be equipped with a relatively powerful processor unit, since otherwise data processing bottlenecks can occur.
  • a high volume of data can be transmitted between the signal processing device and the sensors.
  • the sensors communicate with the signal processing device via a common bus system, this can require that the bus system is designed for a high data transmission rate, since data transmission bottlenecks can otherwise occur.
  • the triggering should not necessarily be carried out centrally from the signal processing device.
  • a sensor should be triggered directly or indirectly by another sensor.
  • the other sensor can be designed to monitor another operating parameter and to trigger the sensor to be triggered only when this other operating parameter assumes a predetermined trigger property.
  • sensors should no longer necessarily be instructed centrally by the signal processing device to record the operating parameters to be monitored by them and/or to transmit them to the signal processing device, or the signal processing device no longer needs to decide centrally whether or when to analyze transmitted monitored operating parameters should be. Instead, the detection of the operating parameters and/or a corresponding signal transmission or an analysis of transmitted data should be triggered decentrally with the aid of further sensors.
  • Such decentralized triggering can, for example, prevent a bus system used for data transmission from being permanently loaded with a data flow and/or the signal processing device having to analyze continuously transmitted data, although, for example, no relevant event has currently occurred that would require the detection of operating parameters and the transmission of which would appear necessary.
  • the decentralized triggered triggering using additional sensors can therefore help to avoid data processing bottlenecks and/or data transmission bottlenecks.
  • the operating parameters to be monitored can be various operating parameters that allow conclusions to be drawn about the current operating status in a passenger transport system.
  • such operating parameters can act locally Accelerations on components of the passenger transport system, such as an entire car of an elevator, a door of a car of an elevator or the conveying unit of an escalator. Accelerations that act temporarily and are measured as part of the method described here enable, for example, conclusions to be drawn about the current movements of the components mentioned.
  • Monitoring other operating parameters can include, for example, measuring locally prevailing temperatures, locally occurring noises, locally occurring electrical, magnetic or other fields, etc.
  • information about electric currents for example to drive components in a passenger transport system, can be obtained by measuring electric or magnetic fields.
  • the first operating parameter to be detected by the first sensor can preferably be selected in such a way that it can be detected by the sensor with a technically simple sensor system.
  • the first operating parameter can be selected such that sensor data reflecting it require a small data volume per measurement process (for example less than 10 bytes or less than 2 bytes), so that both a corresponding data analysis and data transmission are simplified.
  • the first operating parameter can be a volume, which is easy to measure, of a noise that prevails locally in the passenger transport system.
  • the first operating parameter can be a current towards a drive component in the passenger transport system or an electric or magnetic field caused thereby.
  • the trigger property which is to be detected when the first operating parameter is detected, so that the second sensor is triggered, can generally be any property of the detected first operating parameter that is clearly to be identified.
  • the trigger property can be a threshold value which, when exceeded or undershot, triggers the second sensor.
  • a slope along which the first operating parameter develops over time or a steepness of such a slope can serve as a trigger property.
  • the trigger property can be, for example, a volume threshold that is to be exceeded or fallen below, or a volume development that increases or decreases with a steep edge.
  • the presence of such a trigger property can be detected relatively easily using a simple sensor, for example in the form of a simple microphone.
  • more complex properties of a monitored first operating parameter can also be monitored with regard to the presence of a trigger property.
  • the spectrum of a detected noise could be examined for the presence of a specific spectral component, with the spectral component being able to be typical of specific noises such as squeaking, for example.
  • the second operating parameter to be detected can be any operating parameter that differs from the first operating parameter. It can be advantageous to select the first and second operating parameters in such a way that the second operating parameter is technically more complex and/or more expensive to measure than the first operating parameter. On the other hand, it can also be advantageous that the second operating parameter can give a more meaningful conclusion about the current operating state of the passenger transport system than the first operating parameter.
  • the second operating parameter can be transmitted to the signal processing device in any desired manner.
  • a signal or data can be transmitted via a hard-wired network or via a wireless network.
  • transmission can take place via a bus system, via which an essentially arbitrarily large number of sensors can generally communicate with one another and with the signal processing device.
  • the first operating parameter detected by the first sensor can also be transmitted to the signal processing device in the same or a similar manner.
  • a function of sensors within a passenger transport system at least partly controlled decentrally. This can significantly reduce the amount of data to be transmitted or data to be processed.
  • technically simple first sensors can be used to trigger possibly more complex second sensors or to trigger the signal processing device to process their sensor data.
  • a transmission of sensor data of the second operating parameter to the signal processing device and a processing of this sensor data can be reduced in that such sensor data is only generated, transmitted and/or processed if this is done by the first sensor upon detection of the trigger property was triggered at the first operating parameter.
  • each of the first and second sensors can be relatively simple in design, a more complex sensor system can be simulated overall, for example, in which various operating parameters are monitored and when predefined trigger properties are reached, the monitoring of other operating parameters is triggered, for example.
  • the signal processing device can process the signal reflecting the second operating parameter in a wide variety of ways. For example, filtering can be carried out or statistical characteristic values such as averaging and/or determination of minimum values, maximum values and/or the standard deviation. The processing can also only consist of forwarding the signal to another device.
  • a current sensor, an acceleration sensor and a microphone are installed in a car door sensor arrangement, for example.
  • the current sensor is connected to the main power supply to the car door.
  • the current sensor acting as the first sensor in this case can detect whether the car door is currently beginning to be opened or closed on the basis of current current signal patterns, which in this case were predetermined as a trigger property. If such a trigger property is detected, a first trigger signal is output and transmitted to the acceleration sensor and/or the microphone, which in this case act as second sensors. These then begin to monitor whether the car door is accelerated in a manner typical for opening or closing, or whether typical noises are generated in the process.
  • Corresponding signals are transmitted from the acceleration sensor and/or the microphone to the signal processing device 35 transmitted.
  • the triggering can either activate the following second sensors in order to measure the operating parameters to be detected by them, or activate a processing or analysis of continuously recorded operating parameters, for example until the triggering is deactivated again or a deactivating second trigger signal is transmitted.
  • the signals can be transmitted from a signal processing device to an external monitoring device, possibly after prior processing. If atypical operating parameters are detected in the signals, which indicate, for example, that the car door is accelerating too slowly or that there are unusual noises, this can be recognized as a malfunction of the car door.
  • a first sensor in the form of a current sensor can detect, for example, when a main current supply to a drive unit increases significantly, for example to switch from slow speed to fast speed.
  • the first sensor can then trigger an acceleration sensor and/or a microphone as second sensors, for example to measure accelerations or noises that occur, which can be used to track whether the transition to faster driving is correct or whether there are delays or unusual noises, for example due to malfunctions.
  • the proposed method also includes transmitting the processed signal to a monitoring device that is remote from the passenger transport system.
  • the signal processing device can be designed to transmit signals to a monitoring device that is arranged remotely from the passenger transport system.
  • the signals transmitted to the signal processing device with regard to the second operating parameters can be at least partially processed in the signal processing device and then forwarded to an external monitoring device.
  • the monitoring device can be localized outside the passenger transport system, in particular also outside the building accommodating the passenger transport system.
  • the Monitoring device be part of a monitoring center set up by a manufacturer of the passenger transport system. In this way, using the transmitted operating parameters in the monitoring device, operating states of the passenger transport system can be monitored remotely and, if necessary, suitable measures can be taken if anomalies occur.
  • a volume of data to be transmitted or a volume of data to be processed can be kept low due to the decentralized triggering of the second sensors.
  • the first sensor transmits a trigger signal directly to the second sensor in order to trigger the second sensor.
  • several or all of the plurality of sensors can be designed to transmit signals, in particular trigger signals, to others of the plurality of sensors.
  • triggering of a second sensor and thus detection of the second operating parameter can be triggered in that a first sensor detects the presence of the predetermined trigger property in the first operating parameter detected by it and then transmits a signal directly to the second sensor in order to to trigger this.
  • a data transmission from the first sensor to the signal processing device does not necessarily have to take place in order to trigger the second sensor. Instead, it may be sufficient for the first sensor to communicate directly with the second sensor in order to trigger it. In this way, data transmission volumes, data processing volumes and/or reaction times, ie times until the second sensor is actually triggered after detecting a trigger property, can be reduced.
  • the first and the second sensor can advantageously communicate via a network or a data bus to which they are both connected.
  • the first sensor transmits a signal reflecting the detected first operating parameter to the second sensor.
  • the second sensor it is not the first but the second sensor that detects the presence of the predetermined trigger property and generates a trigger signal in response thereto.
  • the trigger signal is an internal signal within the second sensor.
  • the first sensor can transmit a trigger signal to the signal processing system for triggering the second sensor, and the signal processing system can then transmit a trigger signal to the second sensor. Then several or all of the plurality of sensors would be designed to transmit signals to the signal processing device.
  • the first sensor transmits its trigger signal not directly to the second sensor but to the signal processing device.
  • the signal processing device can then forward this trigger signal to the second sensor.
  • the signal processing device has the option, for example, of influencing the triggering of the second sensor itself, for example after the trigger signal transmitted by the first sensor has been analyzed and/or processed.
  • the signals themselves are usually of a technically simple design and, in particular, have little or no signal processing capability of their own, but instead always emit the trigger signal when the trigger property is reached, for example, an interposition of the signal processing device can thus enable the emitted trigger signal to be transmitted either unfiltered to the second Forward sensor or to process this in advance in the signal processing device.
  • the signal processing device has, for example, the Ability to compare the trigger signal with signals from other sensors and, for example, to be able to decide depending on the situation whether the second sensor should actually be triggered.
  • the second sensor is triggered for the first time as soon as the first operating parameter detected by the first sensor assumes a predetermined first trigger property.
  • the second sensor repeatedly detects the second operating parameter and the signal reflecting the detected second operating parameter is transmitted to the signal processing device in response to the initial triggering until the first operating parameter detected by the first sensor assumes a predetermined second trigger property and then a second trigger signal is transmitted to the second sensor.
  • the first sensor can not only generate a first trigger signal in order to cause the second sensor to measure the second operating parameter for its part, but it can be provided that the second sensor repeatedly measures the second operating parameter until it is detected by the first sensor receives a second trigger signal, which causes it to end the repeated measurement process.
  • the first and the second trigger signal can be emitted in response to the detection of a first or a second trigger property.
  • the two trigger properties can be identical, ie the first trigger signal is triggered when the trigger property is detected for the first time and the second trigger signal is then triggered when the same trigger property is subsequently detected.
  • the two trigger properties are preferably different from one another.
  • the first and second trigger properties can be two different threshold values with respect to the observed first operating parameter.
  • the first trigger signal can be generated, for example, when a detected volume exceeds a first threshold value.
  • the second trigger signal can then be generated when the detected volume falls below the first or a second threshold value again.
  • the first sensor can be used to control or trigger a function of the second sensor in a decentralized manner. In particular, starting and ending a measurement operation of the second sensor can be triggered.
  • a sensor repeatedly detects the operating parameter to be detected by it over a period of time and then determines the trigger property for subsequent detection processes.
  • a certain learning function can be implemented in one of the sensors of the passenger transport system.
  • the learning function can be used so that the trigger property, on the basis of which the operating parameter monitored by the sensor is monitored and the trigger signal is triggered when it is reached, does not necessarily have to be permanently preset. Instead, the sensor can set or define this trigger property itself as part of its learning function. For this purpose, the sensor can first observe the operating parameter to be recorded by it over a certain period of time, i.e. repeatedly record the operating parameter, and then determine the trigger property based on this observation. Because of this learning function, the sensor can at least partially adapt its properties to the actually prevailing conditions.
  • a microphone used as the first sensor can initially observe ambient noise over a specific period of time. If it can be assumed during this period that the passenger transport system is in the normal state, one or more threshold values can then be established based on the observed noises of maximum volume, which can be defined as a trigger property. Occurs in the later operation of the first sensor In the event that significantly louder noises are detected, this can then trigger a second sensor. In this case, it can be assumed, for example, that the particularly loud noises were generated due to a fault, such as a squeaking of components of the passenger transport system rubbing against one another. This can be interpreted as a reason to measure second operating parameters, which can, for example, allow a more precise conclusion to be drawn about the fault.
  • the sensors can be designed to detect only one type of operating parameter.
  • the sensors contained in the device for the people-transport system can be relatively simple sensors that need only be set up to measure a single type of operating parameter. Due to the low complexity of the respective sensors that is possible as a result, their costs can be reduced and/or their reliability can be improved. Due to the fact that different sensors can communicate with one another and, in particular, can trigger one another, sensor arrangements that appear complex can nevertheless be created, with the aid of which various operating parameters can be recorded and monitored according to the situation.
  • FIG. 1 shows a passenger transport system in the form of an elevator with a device according to the invention for monitoring operating parameters.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a device according to the invention for monitoring operating parameters.
  • FIG 1 shows a passenger transport system 1 in the form of an elevator system 2.
  • the elevator system 2 comprises an elevator car 5 and a counterweight 7, which can be displaced in an elevator shaft using ropes or belts 9, which are driven by a drive machine 11 in a machine room 12.
  • the elevator car 5 has a car door 13.
  • several shaft doors 15 are provided on the elevator shaft. Operation of the elevator system 2 and in particular the drive machine 11 and the car door 13 and the shaft doors 15 is controlled using an elevator controller 17 .
  • a plurality of sensor arrangements 19 are distributed over the elevator system 2 .
  • the sensor arrangements 19 are designed to detect specific operating parameters in the elevator installation 2 .
  • a drive machine sensor arrangement 23 can be arranged on the drive machine 11 .
  • This can contain, for example, sensors with the help of which electric current flows supplied to the drive machine 11, accelerations acting on the drive machine 11, for example in the form of vibrations, temperatures prevailing at the drive machine 11, noises occurring at the drive machine 11 and/or near the drive machine 11 prevailing electrical and/or magnetic fields etc. can be measured.
  • an elevator car sensor arrangement 27 can be arranged on the elevator car 5 . This can, for example, detect accelerations acting on the elevator car 5, noises occurring there, temperatures or fields prevailing there, etc.
  • the elevator car sensor arrangement 27 can also include a camera arrangement 31 with the aid of which, for example, an interior space in the elevator car 5 can be observed.
  • a cabin door sensor arrangement 29 can be arranged on the cabin door 13 . This can, for example, measure accelerations acting on the cabin door 13, noises occurring there, etc.
  • a shaft door sensor arrangement 25 can be arranged on each of the shaft doors 15 . This can, for example, record accelerations acting on the shaft door 15, noises occurring there, etc.
  • a machine room door sensor arrangement 21 can be provided at an entrance to the machine room 12, with the aid of which a closed state of a machine room door, noises occurring there, etc. can be measured.
  • the various sensor arrangements 19 can transmit signals, which contain information about the operating parameters they have detected, to a signal processing device 35 .
  • the signals can be processed and/or evaluated there.
  • the signals received can be sent to a remote monitoring device 36 via a data communication device 33 before or after their processing or evaluation.
  • the monitoring device 36 can be set up, for example, in a monitoring center in which, for example, the manufacturer of the passenger transport system can remotely monitor its function.
  • a data or signal transmission between the sensors and the signal processing device 35 and from the signal processing device 35 via the data communication device 33 to the monitoring device 36 can be wired or wireless.
  • the many sensor arrangements 19 contained therein generally permanently supply signals or sensor data to the signal processing device 35 or must be centrally controlled by it. On the one hand, this requires a high level of data processing effort in the signal processing device 35 and, on the other hand, a high volume of data transmission between the sensor systems 19 and the signal processing device 35.
  • the individual sensor arrangements 19 should in principle be able to transmit their signals and sensor data to the signal processing device 35, but that this should not be done permanently, but only for one or some of the sensors upon special triggering happens.
  • the sensor arrangements 19 should be designed in such a way that the sensors contained therein can at least partially trigger each other, i.e. individual sensors can be triggered decentrally and without the need for control or intervention by, for example, the signal processing device 35.
  • FIG. 1 shows a device 3 with the aid of which operating parameters in a passenger transport system 1 can be monitored with the aid of one or more sensor systems 19 .
  • the device 3 includes three different sensors 37, 39, 41.
  • Each of the sensors 37, 39, 41 is designed to detect at least one operating parameter of the passenger transport system 1.
  • the various sensors 37, 39, 41 are designed differently and can therefore measure different operating parameters.
  • a certain simple signal processing can take place in the sensors 37, 39, 41, for example in the form of segmentation, limit value monitoring, etc.
  • the sensors 37, 39, 41 can provide the signals either continuously, periodically or in response generate on an externally caused trigger.
  • This first trigger signal T 1a can be transmitted from the first sensor 37 either directly to a second sensor 39, as in 2 indicated by a dashed arrow.
  • the first trigger signal T 1a can be transmitted to the signal processing device 35 in a variant that is not covered by the claims and can be transmitted by it to the second sensor 39 directly or possibly after a certain processing.
  • the second sensor 39 Only in response to such a first trigger signal T 1a does the second sensor 39 begin to detect the second operating parameter to be monitored by it and to transmit corresponding signals to the signal processing device 35 .
  • the signal processing device 35 can process the signals received from the second sensor 39 and, if necessary, subsequently or already forward them as raw signals via the data communication device 33 to the external monitoring device 36, so that the external monitoring device 36 can draw conclusions about the current operating state of the passenger transport system 1 based on these signals.
  • the second sensor 39 can detect the second operating parameter once and transmit it to the signal processing device.
  • the second sensor 39 can, in response to the first trigger signal T 1a , begin to repeatedly or continuously record the second operating parameter and/or to transmit it to the signal processing device.
  • a grasp of second operating parameter can possibly be stopped again in response to a second trigger signal T 1e to be output by the first sensor 37 .
  • the first sensor 37 can detect when the operating parameter it monitors assumes a second trigger property, ie exceeds or falls below a further threshold value, and then transmit the second trigger signal T 1e to the second sensor 39 .
  • the detection of the second operating parameter can be ended automatically after a predetermined time. It can also be provided that the second sensor 39 records the second operating parameter for as long as the first trigger signal T 1a is being transmitted by the first sensor 37 and the recording of the second operating parameter is ended as soon as the first trigger signal T 1a is no longer being transmitted .
  • the second sensor 39 can possibly also generate trigger signals and transmit them to further sensors 41 .
  • the second sensor 39 can detect when the second operating parameter it monitors assumes a trigger property or one of a large number of possible trigger properties.
  • the second sensor 39 can then output corresponding trigger signals T 2n , T 2w , T 2f .
  • These trigger signals can be transmitted to one or more other sensors 41 in order to cause them to become active and to record operating parameters and transmit them to the signal processing device.
  • the second sensor can generate a trigger signal T 2n , a trigger signal T 2w or a trigger signal T 2f . spend.
  • the trigger signal T 2n can indicate that a normal state has been recognized for the second operating parameter.
  • the trigger signal T 2w can indicate in the form of a kind of warning that an anomaly has been detected in the second operating parameter.
  • the trigger signal T 2f can indicate that an error in the detection of the second operating parameter was detected.
  • the addressed further sensor 41 can react appropriately.
  • a type of sensor chain or sensor network can be formed in which one or more individual sensors 37, 39 can trigger other sensors 39, 41 and thereby activate them.
  • the first sensor 37 can also continuously transmit a signal reflecting the detected first operating parameter to the second sensor 39 .
  • the second sensor 39 checks itself whether the first operating parameter assumes a predetermined first or second trigger property. If this is the case, the second sensor 39, as described above, generates the first sensor 37 internal trigger signals which, as described above, start or end a detection of the second operating parameter.
  • the second sensor instead of trigger signals T 2n , T 2w and T 2f . also continuously transmit a signal reflecting the detected second operating parameter to further sensors 41, which then evaluate this as described.
  • a current sensor, an acceleration sensor and a microphone are installed in the car door sensor assembly 29.
  • the current sensor is connected to the main power supply to the car door 13 .
  • the current sensor acting as the first sensor 37 in this case can detect whether the cabin door 13 is currently beginning to be opened or closed on the basis of current current signal patterns, which in this case were predetermined as a trigger property. If such a trigger property is detected, a first trigger signal is output and transmitted to the acceleration sensor and/or the microphone, which act as second sensors 39 in this case. These then begin to monitor whether the car door 13 is accelerated in a manner typical for opening or closing, or whether typical noises are generated in the process.
  • Corresponding signals are transmitted to the signal processing device 35 by the acceleration sensor and/or the microphone.
  • the triggering can either activate the following second sensors 39 in order to measure the operating parameters to be detected by them, or activate a processing or analysis of continuously recorded operating parameters, for example until the triggering is deactivated again or a deactivating second trigger signal is transmitted.
  • the signals are transmitted from the signal processing device 35 to the external monitoring device 36, possibly after prior processing. If atypical operating parameters are detected in the signals, which, for example, indicate a too slow If the car door accelerates or there are unusual noises, this can be recognized as a malfunction of the car door 13 .
  • a first sensor 37 in the form of a current sensor can detect, for example, when a main current supply to a drive unit increases significantly, for example to switch from slow speed to fast speed.
  • the first sensor 37 can then trigger one or more second sensors 39 in order to measure accelerations or noises, for example, which can be used to track whether the transition to faster travel is taking place correctly or whether there are delays or unusual noises due to malfunctions, for example comes.
  • trigger signals generated by sensors can be made available to all sensors in a network. Furthermore, multiple triggers and/or sensor signals can be combined in order, for example, to merge the functions of multiple sensors.
  • signals already measured by sensors can be reused within a decentralized sensor network.
  • performance, reliability and/or efficiency within the sensor network can be improved.
  • simple sensors can be combined with one another in order to be able to provide more complex information in the form of a sensor fusion.
  • signal segmentation can take place using sensor signals, preferably without a connection to, for example, a controller of the passenger transport system.
  • operating parameters can be recorded exclusively or primarily during relevant times or relevant events.
  • the solution proposed here can make it possible to retrofit existing passenger transport systems with sensors that can detect specific operating states without a connection having to be established, for example, to a controller of the passenger transport system. Furthermore, a number of Wiring can be reduced through the reuse of signals and trigger signals within the sensor network, in particular due to the unnecessary connection to the control of the passenger transport system. Ultimately, in particular, a cost reduction can be achieved, for example through sensor fusion using a plurality of simple sensors instead of one complex sensor.
  • the planned decentralized triggering of individual sensors 39, 41 by other sensors 37, 39 can reduce the amount of data processed and/or the amount of data transmitted, the need for wiring reduced and complex sensor functions can be achieved with the help of simple sensors 37, 39, 41 that cooperate with one another, which in particular when retrofitting existing passenger transport systems 1 can be advantageous.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
  • Escalators And Moving Walkways (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Procédé permettant la surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans un système de transport de passagers (1),
    dans lequel le système de transport de passagers (1) présente une pluralité de capteurs (37, 39, 41) détectant différents paramètres de fonctionnement et un appareil de traitement de signal (35),
    dans lequel le procédé présente :
    la détection répétée d'un premier paramètre de fonctionnement au moyen d'un premier (37) des capteurs ;
    le déclenchement d'un second (39) des capteurs lorsque le premier paramètre de fonctionnement détecté par le premier capteur (37) adopte une propriété de déclenchement prédéfinie ;
    la détection d'un second paramètre de fonctionnement au moyen du second capteur (39) ainsi que la transmission d'un signal reproduisant le second paramètre de fonctionnement détecté à l'appareil de traitement de signal (35) en réponse au déclenchement ;
    le traitement du signal pour la surveillance du second paramètre de fonctionnement, caractérisé en ce que
    le premier capteur (37) transmet un signal de déclenchement directement au second capteur (39) pour déclencher le second capteur (39), ou
    le premier capteur (37) transmet un signal reproduisant le premier paramètre de fonctionnement détecté au second capteur (39) et le second capteur (39) génère un signal interne dans le second capteur (39) en tant que signal de déclenchement pour déclencher le second capteur (39).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, présentant en outre :
    la transmission du signal traité à un appareil de surveillance (36) disposé à distance du système de transport de passagers (1).
  3. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le second capteur (39) est déclenché pour la première fois lorsque le premier paramètre de fonctionnement détecté par le premier capteur (37) adopte une première propriété de déclenchement prédéfinie, et le second capteur (39) détecte de façon répétée le second paramètre de fonctionnement et transmet le signal reproduisant le second paramètre de fonctionnement détecté à l'appareil de traitement de signal (35) en réponse au déclenchement de la première fois, jusqu'à ce que le premier paramètre de fonctionnement détecté par le premier capteur (37) adopte une seconde propriété de déclenchement prédéfinie et de ce fait un second signal de déclenchement est transmis au second capteur (39).
  4. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'un des capteurs (37, 39, 41) détecte de façon répétée le paramètre de fonctionnement qu'il doit détecter sur une période de temps et de ce fait prédétermine la propriété de déclenchement pour des processus de détection ultérieurs.
  5. Dispositif (3) permettant la surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans un système de transport de passagers (1),
    dans lequel le dispositif (3) est configuré pour être installé dans le système de transport de passagers (1) et présente une pluralité de capteurs (37, 39, 41) détectant différents paramètres de fonctionnement et un appareil de traitement de signal (35),
    dans lequel le dispositif (3) est configuré pour mettre en œuvre un procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4.
  6. Dispositif selon la revendication 5, dans lequel plusieurs capteurs parmi la pluralité de capteurs (37, 39, 41) sont configurés pour transmettre des signaux à d'autres capteurs parmi la pluralité de capteurs (37, 39, 41).
  7. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications 5 à 6, dans lequel plusieurs capteurs de la pluralité de capteurs (37, 39, 41) sont configurés pour transmettre des signaux à l'appareil de traitement de signal (35).
  8. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications 5 à 7, dans lequel l'appareil de traitement de signal (35) est configuré pour transmettre des signaux à un appareil de surveillance (36) à distance du système de transport de passagers (1).
  9. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications 5 à 8, dans lequel plusieurs des capteurs (37, 39, 41) sont configurés pour détecter seulement un type de paramètres de fonctionnement.
  10. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications 5 à 9, dans lequel l'un des capteurs (37, 39, 41) est configuré pour détecter de façon répétée le paramètre de fonctionnement qu'il doit détecter sur une période de temps et de ce fait pour prédéterminer la propriété de déclenchement pour des processus de détection ultérieurs.
  11. Système de transport de passagers (1), présentant un dispositif (3) selon l'une des revendications 5 à 10.
  12. Procédé permettant la mise à niveau d'un système de transport de passagers (1), présentant un équipement du système de transport de passagers (1) avec un dispositif (3) selon l'une des revendications 5 à 10.
EP18710470.8A 2017-03-15 2018-03-13 Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes Active EP3595997B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP17161196 2017-03-15
PCT/EP2018/056130 WO2018166994A1 (fr) 2017-03-15 2018-03-13 Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller des paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3595997A1 EP3595997A1 (fr) 2020-01-22
EP3595997B1 true EP3595997B1 (fr) 2022-06-22

Family

ID=58347236

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18710470.8A Active EP3595997B1 (fr) 2017-03-15 2018-03-13 Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US11884513B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3595997B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN110418760B (fr)
AU (1) AU2018233072B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA3051111A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018166994A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102024110929A1 (de) * 2024-04-18 2025-04-17 Tk Elevator Innovation And Operations Gmbh Verfahren zur Verschleißerkennung bei einer Aufzugsanlage und Aufzugsanlage

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019206624A1 (fr) * 2018-04-26 2019-10-31 Inventio Ag Procédé de surveillance de caractéristiques d'une opération de mouvement de porte d'une porte d'ascenseur à l'aide d'un dispositif mobile intelligent
US11518650B2 (en) * 2018-06-15 2022-12-06 Otis Elevator Company Variable thresholds for an elevator system
US11673769B2 (en) * 2018-08-21 2023-06-13 Otis Elevator Company Elevator monitoring using vibration sensors near the elevator machine
US12006185B2 (en) * 2018-10-19 2024-06-11 Otis Elevator Company Continuous quality monitoring of a conveyance system
US12110210B2 (en) 2018-10-22 2024-10-08 Otis Elevator Company System for tracking elevator ride quality
SG11202104878RA (en) * 2018-12-24 2021-06-29 Inventio Ag Passenger transport system
US11353859B2 (en) * 2019-03-19 2022-06-07 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. System and method for anomaly detection in time-varying system operations
AU2021208274B2 (en) * 2020-01-16 2024-08-15 Inventio Ag Method for the digital documentation and simulation of components in a personnel transport installation
CN112050857B (zh) * 2020-09-09 2022-04-01 自然资源部第二海洋研究所 海洋水文观测浮标的观测数据处理方法、装置及服务器
CN112390102B (zh) * 2020-11-02 2022-06-21 上海三菱电梯有限公司 电梯监视系统及电梯监视方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2549295A2 (fr) * 2011-07-16 2013-01-23 Valeo Schalter und Sensoren GmbH Dispositif de capteur pour un véhicule automobile, véhicule automobile et procédé de fonctionnement d'au moins deux capteurs dans un véhicule automobile
EP3075692A1 (fr) * 2015-04-03 2016-10-05 Otis Elevator Company Détection de passager basée sur un capteur de profondeur pour détermination d'enceinte de transport de passagers vides
WO2017028919A1 (fr) * 2015-08-19 2017-02-23 Otis Elevator Company Système de commande d'ascenseur et procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'ascenseur

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI20002390A0 (fi) 2000-10-30 2000-10-30 Kone Corp Menetelmä hissin automaatioven kunnon valvomiseksi
US8532955B2 (en) * 2009-02-26 2013-09-10 Apple Inc. Minimization of false trigger in a mobile electronic system
CN102666341B (zh) * 2009-12-22 2014-07-02 因温特奥股份公司 用于确定升降机轿厢的移动和/或位置的方法和装置
US9376289B2 (en) * 2010-12-28 2016-06-28 Otis Elevator Company Elevator control system with sleep monitor
EP2604564A1 (fr) * 2011-12-14 2013-06-19 Inventio AG Diagnostic d'erreur d'une installation d'ascenseur et de ses composants à l'aide d'un capteur
CN104781173B (zh) * 2012-11-05 2017-02-22 奥的斯电梯公司 惯性测量单元辅助的电梯位置校准
US9734003B2 (en) * 2012-12-27 2017-08-15 Japan Elevator Service Holdings Co., Ltd. Remote monitoring support apparatus
EP3232177B1 (fr) * 2016-04-15 2019-06-05 Otis Elevator Company Détection de décantation de bâtiment

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2549295A2 (fr) * 2011-07-16 2013-01-23 Valeo Schalter und Sensoren GmbH Dispositif de capteur pour un véhicule automobile, véhicule automobile et procédé de fonctionnement d'au moins deux capteurs dans un véhicule automobile
EP3075692A1 (fr) * 2015-04-03 2016-10-05 Otis Elevator Company Détection de passager basée sur un capteur de profondeur pour détermination d'enceinte de transport de passagers vides
WO2017028919A1 (fr) * 2015-08-19 2017-02-23 Otis Elevator Company Système de commande d'ascenseur et procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'ascenseur

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102024110929A1 (de) * 2024-04-18 2025-04-17 Tk Elevator Innovation And Operations Gmbh Verfahren zur Verschleißerkennung bei einer Aufzugsanlage und Aufzugsanlage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11884513B2 (en) 2024-01-30
BR112019015935A2 (pt) 2020-03-24
US20200002127A1 (en) 2020-01-02
CA3051111A1 (fr) 2018-09-20
WO2018166994A1 (fr) 2018-09-20
CN110418760B (zh) 2021-03-02
AU2018233072A1 (en) 2019-09-19
CN110418760A (zh) 2019-11-05
EP3595997A1 (fr) 2020-01-22
AU2018233072B2 (en) 2021-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3595997B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes
DE10362095B4 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Verringern von Aufzugsschwingungen
EP3601132B1 (fr) Réseau de capteurs pour une installation de transport de personnes
EP2516305B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination du mouvement et/ou de la position d'une cabine d'ascenseur
EP3356273B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de commande d'un ascenseur
EP2760774B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé destinés à la surveillance de portes palières
EP2730906A2 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de l'état d'un palier à roulement
EP3452397B1 (fr) Installation de transport de passagers comprenant une unite de commande centrale et plusieurs appareils de terrain comprenant un procede de reconnaissance de dysfonctionnement optimise
EP3233697B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de sécurité électronique ayant des participants temporaires
EP2741989A1 (fr) Surveillance du fonctionnement d'un élément de sécurité
EP3468905B1 (fr) Installation de transport de personnes comprenant une unite de commande centrale et plusieurs appareils de terrain communiquant avec des telegrammes de donnees prioritaires par des periodes d'attente
EP3131843B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation d'ascenseur et dispositif de commande d'ascenseur fonctionnant selon le procédé
EP2457860A2 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité pour ascenseur
EP3233698B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de sécurité électronique ayant des participants temporaires
EP4126733A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance de sécurité, et procédé de surveillance de sécurité d'un système d'ascenseur
EP3697712B1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance d'une cabine d'ascenseur
EP2700607B1 (fr) Agencement, module et procédé de fonctionnement sûr d'une installation
WO2022136504A1 (fr) Ascenseur, procédé de commande d'un ascenseur
WO2019086205A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance de sécurité destiné à surveiller des états relatifs à la sécurité dans une installation de transport de personnes ainsi que procédé destiné à faire fonctionner ce dernier
WO1988005570A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de surveillance d'organes de commande terminaux commandes par un ordinateur
EP3730440A1 (fr) Dispositif de commande permettant de commander un fonctionnement d'une installation de transport de personnes
EP3233696B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de sécurité électronique ayant des participants temporaires
DE102021109462A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Aufzugsanlage sowie Verfahren
DE102017112381B4 (de) Automatisiertes Analyseverfahren für verschleißbehaftete Teile an Aufzugsanlagen
DE102025130343A1 (de) Aufzugsanlage mit BUS-System und mehreren Betriebsmodi

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190729

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210325

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220125

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220214

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220214

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502018009973

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1499672

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: INVENTIO AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220922

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220923

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221024

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221022

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502018009973

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1499672

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220622

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250327

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250324

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20250325

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20250401

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180313