EP0558622A1

EP0558622A1 - Premix compositions of polyol, blowing agent and optionally additives having improved storage stability

Info

Publication number: EP0558622A1
Application number: EP19920900913
Authority: EP
Inventors: Earl A. E. Lund; Robert G. Richard; Ian R. Shankland; David P. Wilson
Original assignee: AlliedSignal Inc
Current assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Priority date: 1990-11-20
Filing date: 1991-10-30
Publication date: 1993-09-08
Also published as: JPH0786152B2; CA2096009A1; CN1061784A; WO1992008756A1; AU659424B2; AU9074391A; MX9102055A; JPH05507311A; KR100220052B1

Abstract

Compositions prémélangées d'un polyol approprié pour une préparation de mousse de polyisocyanurate ou de polyuréthanne, de 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoréthane et d'additifs facultatifs et/ou d'agents gonflants auxiliaires qui ne nécessitent pas de stabilisateur pour inhiber une réaction entre le fluorocarbone et le polyol. Ces mélanges sont utiles pour la préparation de mousse de polyisocyanurate et de polyuréthane.Premixed polyol compositions suitable for preparation of polyisocyanurate or polyurethane foam, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluorethane and optional additives and / or auxiliary blowing agents which do not require a stabilizer to inhibit a reaction between fluorocarbon and polyol. These mixtures are useful for the preparation of polyisocyanurate foam and polyurethane.

Description

PREMIX COMPOSITIONS OF POLYOL, BLOWING AGENT

AND OPTIONALLY ADDITIVES HAVING IMPROVED STORAGE STABILITY

This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly assigned Application Serial No.: 251,730. filed October 3, 1988, and entitled Polyol-Blowing Agent Compositions With Improved Storage Stability which was recently allowed.

Field of the Invention

This invention relates to improved

polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foam systems which eliminate the need for stabilizers used in the past with certain chlorofluorocarbon blowing agents. The improvement stems from the discovery that use of 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (CCl₂FCH₃) as the blowing agent provides enhanced chemical stability when the blowing agent is stored as a pre-mix, i.e. blowing agent pre-blended with certain other

components used in polyurethane-type foam

manufacture, such as polyols. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well known to those skilled in the art that polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams can be prepared by reacting and foaming a mixture of

ingredients, consisting in general of an organic polyisocyanate (including diisocyanate) and an appropriate amount of polyol or mixture of polyols in the presence of a volatile liquid blowing agent. which is caused to vaporize by the heat liberated during the reaction of isocyanate and polyol. It is also well known that this reaction and foaming process can be enhanced through use of amine and/or tin catalysts as well as surfactants. The catalysts ensure adequate curing of the foam while the

surfactants regulate and control cell size.

In the class of foams known as low density rigid polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam the blowing agent of choice has been- trichlorofluoromethane, CCl₃F, also known as CFC-11. These types of foams are closed-cell foams in which the CFC-11 vapor is encapsulated or trapped in the matrix of closed cells. They offer excellent thermal

insulation, due in part to the very low thermal conductivity of CFC-11 vapor, and are used widely in insulation applications, e.g. roofing systems, building panels, refrigerators and freezers.

Generally, 1-40 and typically, 15-40 parts of blowing agent per 100 parts polyol are used in rigid

polyurethane or polyisocyanurate formulations.

Flexible polyurethane foams on the other hand are generally open-cell foams and are manufactured using a diisocyanate and polyol along with catalysts and other additives with various combinations of water, methylene chloride and CFC-11 as the blowing agent. These foams are widely used as cushioning materials in items such as furniture, bedding and automobile seats. The quantity of CFC-11 used as an auxillary blowing agent in flexible foam manufacture varies from 1-30 parts by weight per 100 parts of polyol according to the grade of foam being prepared.

It is common practice in the urethane foam systems area to prepare so-called pre-mixes of certain components used to prepare the foam, i.e. often the appropriate quantities of polyol, blowing agent, surfactant, catalyst, flame retardant and other additives, are blended together and sold along with the stoichiometric quantity of polyisocyanate component in two separate containers. This is convenient for the end user who then only has to combine the two reactants in order to create a foam.

It is also common practice for large foam manufacturing plants to pre-mix the polyol with the blowing agent in bulk storage containers. This liquid mixture possesses a lower viscosity than the pure polyol and is therefore easier to pump and meter into the mixing zone of the foam manufacturing equipment.

Special precautions must be taken when following these practices if the blowing agent is CFC-11, namely, the CFC-11 must have a stabilizer added to it in order to inhibit a reaction which can occur between the fluorocarbon and the polyol

resulting in the production of acids such as hydrogen chloride and other organic products such as aldehydes and ketones. These reaction products have a

detrimental effect on the reactivity characteristics of the foam ingredients which in the worst case results in no foaming action at all. Stabilizers found useful in stopping the reaction between

fluorocarbon and polyol have been disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents 3,183,192 and 3,352,789.

Use of such stabilizers with CFC-11/polyol based blends, although successful when measured in terms of fluorocarbon stability, have disadvantages such as added expense and sometimes cause odor problems which persist even in the finished foam.

For the above reasons, it would be advantageous to identify useful fluorocarbon blowing agents which do not require stabilizers in the presence of polyols. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any reliable scientific basis upon which to predict such stability. The propensity for a fluorocarbon species to react with an OH containing species, like a polyol, is dependent, in the

fundamental sense, on the electronic and molecular structures of the fluorocarbon and the OH species involved. Studies of certain reactant systems, such as CFC-11 and ethanol by P.H. Witjens, Aerosol Age Vol. 4, No. 12 (December 1959), P.A. Sanders

"Mechanisms of the Reaction Between Trichlorofluoromethane and Ethyl Alcohol", Proc. of the CSMA 46th Mid-Year Meeting. (May 1960), and J.M. Church and J.H. Mayer, J. of Chem. and Eng. Data. Vol. 6, No. 3 (July 1961), have shown that the reaction products include hydrochloric acid, acetaldehyde and

CHCl₂F. Sanders, in Soap and Chemical Specialties, (December 1965) has shown that these reactions are further promoted by the presence of metal and water.

H.M. Parmelee and R.C. Downing in Soap Sanitory Chemicals, Vol. 26, pp. 114-119 (July 1950) have shown that fluorocarbons such as chlorodifluoromethane (FC-22), 1,1-difluoroethane (FC-152a),

1,1,1-chlorodifluoroethane (FC-142b) and 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-1,2-dichloroethane (FC-114) undergo reactions in aqueous and ethanol and isopropanol solutions in the presence of steel and aluminum.

Church and Mayer, supra, state that mixed polyhalogenated hydrocarbons containing both chlorine and fluorine on the same carbon atom are less stable than the polyfluoro derivatives.

The molecular structure of HCFC-141b

(CCl₂FCH₃) suggests that HCFC-141b is amenable to dehydrochlorination due to the presence of hydrogen and chlorine atoms on adjacent carbon atoms. On the other hand HCFC-123 (CHCl₂CF₃) is amenable to

dehydrofluorination, a process requiring a greater activation energy. Therefore it would be expected that HCFC-141b would be less stable than HCFC-123.

The prior art evidence therefore suggests that chlorine and fluorine substituted hydrocarbons as a class react with organic OH containing species such as alcohols and polyols.

U.S. Patent 4,076,644 discloses that HCFC-123 may be used as a blowing agent and does not require a stabilizer in the presence of polyols. Thus,

HCFC-123 may be an exception to the rule that

fluorocarbons require stabilizers.

However, stability tests on HCFC-123 in the presence of a variety of polyols show that HCFC-123 may not be stable in the presence of some polyols which are commonly used in the preparation of

polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams.

It is accordingly an object of this invention to identify another fluorocarbon useful as a blowing agent for polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams which is stable in the presence of polyols and optionally additives and auxillary blowing agents.

It is another object of this invention to identify such a fluorocarbon which is also considered to be a stratospherically safe substitute for CFC-11 which is thought to be a contributor to ozone

depletion and global greenhouse warming.

Yet another object of the invention is to identify such a fluorocarbon which may have a wider or at least different range of applicability to polyols than does HCFC-123.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention comprises premixes of a polyol suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane and

optionally additives and/or auxillary blowing agents in proportions suitable for polyurethane or

polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

HCFC-141b is a known material and can be prepared by methods known to the art such as

disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,833,676.

In accordance with the invention, HCFC-141b may be used as described in the background portion of this description to prepare a variety of polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams by standard techniques known to the art which may include the use of various auxillary blowing agents and standard additives such as catalysts, surfactants, water and others.

The amount of HCFC-141b relative to the amount of polyol employed will vary depending upon the application, the type of foam being prepared, the identity of the polyol and other factors, but can readily be determined by anyone skilled in the art. Generally, from about 1 to 40 parts by weight of HCFC-141b per 100 parts by weight of polyol are employed, but preferably about 15 to 40 parts by weight of HCFC-141b per 100 parts by weight of polyol are used in rigid foam manufacture and about 1-30 parts by weight of HCFC-141b per 100 parts by weight of polyol are used in flexible foam manufacture.

For purposes of this application, the term "storage stable premixes" shall refer to premixes which have been stored for at least 30 days prior to use without any substantial deleterious effect on the reactivity characteristics of the foam ingredients. For purposes of this definition, "substantial

deleterious effect on the reactivity characteristics of the foam ingredients" shall mean that the

reactivity of the foam ingredients decreases such that it produces a 10% increase in any of the

following: cream time, gel time and rise time.

This invention is further illustrated by the following examples in which parts or percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.

EXAMPLES A

In this set of examples the stability of

HCFC-141b with the various polyols listed in Table I is determined and compared with the stability of

CFC-11 and HCFC-123 with the same polyols. The polyols selected are some of the most common polyols used in the commercial foam industry. The

fluorocarbon/polyol mixtures simulate commercial foam formulations. Note that the flash points reported were determined using the following flash point methods: Pensky-Marten Cup Test for the PLURACOL^® polyols; Cleveland Open Cup for the TERATE^®

CHARDOL^®, POLY-G^®and NIAX^®polyols; SETA Flash

Closed Cup for the STEPANOL^® polyol; TAG Closed Cup for the PHT4 diol; and Pensky-Marten Closed Cup for the THANOL^® and VORANOL^® polyols.

TABLE I

OH Viscosity Water Density Flash Polyol Number 25°C Content (lb. /gal.) Point

( cp ) (%)

PLURACOL^® 400 4,500 0.05 Max 9.08@25 C >200ºF 975¹

PLURACOL^® 390 10,500 0.05 Max 9.09@25 C 200ºF 824²

PLURACOL^® 14,000 - 9.24 200ºF 1114³

TERATE^® 316 20,585 Not 1.2 (typ)* 156ºC 203⁴ Detected

STEPANOL^® 230- 2,000- 0.15 Max 10.0@25ºC 200ºF PS-2502A⁵ 250 4,000

CHARDOL^® 235 5,400 0.08(typ) 1.18(typ)* 250°C 336A⁶

(*) indicates specific gravity

¹PLURACOL^® is a trademark of BASF Inc. PLURACOL^®

polyol 975 is a sucrose-based polyether polyol.

²PLURACOL^® is a trademark of BASF Inc. PLURACOL^®

polyol 824 is an aromatic initiator-based polyether polyol.

³PLURACOL^® is a trademark of BASF Inc. PLURACOL^®

polyol 1114 is a polyether polyol/ polyester polyol blend

⁴TERATE^® is a trademark of Cape Industries.

TERATE<_?203 is an aromatic-based

polyester polyol.

⁵STEPANOL^ is a trademark of Stepan Company.

STEPANOL^ PS-2502-A is an aromatic-based polyester polyol.

⁶CHARDOL^®> is a trademark of Cook Composites and

Polymers CHARDOL^® 336-A is a polyethylene terephthalate-based polyester polyol. TABLE I cont.

OH Viscosity Water Density Flash Polyol Number 25°C Content (lb./gal.) Point

(cp) (%)

THANOL^® 520- 12 , 000 0 . 1 Max 1. 12@25°C* 300 º F R-350-X⁷ 540 17 , 000

THANOL^® 440- 22 , 000 0.10 1.06@20°C* 305°F 650-X⁸ 460

POLY-G^® 350 2 , 500 0.08 Max 9.2@25ºC 356ºF 71-357⁹

POLY-G^® 440 5 , 000 0.05 9.2@25°C 204ºC 75-442¹0

NIAX^® 700 1 00 , 000 0.1 Max 1.05@20°C* 455ºF LA-700¹¹

PHT4- 220- 90 , 000 0.1(typ) 1.8@25°C** 200ºF DIOL ¹² 235

(*) indicates specific gravity

(**) indicates density (g/ml)

7THANOL^® is a trademark of ARCO Chemical Co.

THANOL^® R-350-X is an aromatic amine- based polyether polyol.

⁸THANOL^® is a trademark of ARCO Chemical Co.

THANOL^® 650-X is a rigid polyol***.

9pOLY-G® is a trademark of Olin Corporation.

POLY-G^® 71-357 is a sucrose-amine based polyether polyol.

¹⁰POLY-G^® is a trademark of Olin Corporation.

POLY-G^® 75-442 is a methyl glucoside- based polyol.

1¹NIAX^® is a trademark of Union Carbide Corp.

NIAX^® polyol LA-700 refers is an amine- based polyether polyol.

12_PHT4_ is a reactive brominated diol

DIOL manufactured by Great Lakes Chemical

Corp.

***The term "rigid polyol" refers to polyols which are used to make rigid polyurethane or

polyisocyanurate foam. TABLE I cont.

OH Viscosity Water Density Flash Polyol Number 25°C Content (lb./gal.) Point

(cp) (%)

VORANOL^® 370 23,000 0.1 Max 1.11@25°C* 335ºF 370¹³

VORANOL^® 800 17,300 0.10 8.75@25°C 405ºF 800¹⁴

FOAMOL^® 302 28,400 0.13 1.2@25°C* 145ºC 3500¹⁵

(*) indicates specific gravity

¹³VORANOL^® is a trademark of Dow Chemical Corp.

VORANOL^® 370 is a sucrose-based polyether polyol.

¹⁴VORANOL^® is a trademark of Dow Chemical Corp.

VORANOL^® 800 is an amine-based polyether polyol.

¹⁵FOAMOL^® is a trademark of Jim Walter Resources,

Inc. FOAMOL^® 3500 is an aromatic

polyester polyol.

The apparent pH of each blend is determined by mixing 20 cm³ of the fluorocarbon blend with 80 cm³ of 0.1 Normal KCl solution made up in 3:1

methanol:water and then measuring the pH of the final solution with a calibrated pH meter. This type of measurement is believed to be accurate to within

0.1 pH unit. After measuring the initial pH of the

mixtures, they are deposited in sealed glass tubes and placed in an oven controlled at 54°C ± about 0.5°C for a 12 week period. At the end of this period, the pH of the mixtures is again measured.

The results indicate that the HCFC-141b/polyol mixtures are significantly more stable than those of CFC-11 or HCFC-123. Specifically, the reduction in pH is significantly less in the HCFC-141b/polyol mixtures than in those mixtures employing CFC-11 and HCFC-123.

EXAMPLES B

This set of examples further confirms the enhanced stability of HCFC-141b/polyol blends over CFC-11/polyol blends and HCFC-123/polyol blends using a different measure of the acidity change and a more real-life storage technique.

Polyol/blowing agent blends are prepared using the polyols listed in Table I above at a 30 weight percent blowing agent composition. These

compositions are stored in closed, unlined tin-plated steel cans for 10 weeks at 54°C. At the end of the aging period, a sample of the mixture is diluted with ethanol and titrated against a standard solution of KOH in ethanol to a pH-9.5 endpoint. The amount of KOH used is then compared with the amount of KOH required to neutralize the un-aged polyol. The results indicates that HCFC-141b results in

substantially smaller acid generation (i.e., the HCFC-141b containing mixture requires less KOH than do mixtures containing CFC-11 or HCFC-123) in all cases relative to CFC-11 and HCFC-123 indicating it is more stable in the presence of polyols than either CFC-11 or HCFC-123.

Often polyol/blowing agent premixes contain additives like surfactants, catalysts and

emulsifiers. For example, rigid urethane foam formulations may contain silicone surfactants like DC-193, a siloxane, manufactured by Air Products & Chemicals Inc. of Allentown, Pennsylvania, B8404, a polyether modified polysiloxane manufactured by Goldschmidt Chemical Corp. of Hopewell, Virginia and L5420 a polyalkylenoxide methyl siloxane manufactured by Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co., Inc.,

Specialty Chemicals Division of Danbury,

Connecticut. A surfactant has two functions: it may act as a cell regulator, controlling cell nucleation and cell size; it can also act as an emulsifier. In this second capacity, the surfactant allows

incompatible materials to be blended into a

homogenous batch.

Amine catalysts may also be added to the premixes. Some typical amine catalysts include dimethyl ethanol amine, DABCO 33LV^® which is a 33% solution of triethylenediamine in dipropylene glycol and POLYCAT^® 8, which is N,N-dimethylcyclohexyl-amine. DABCO 33LV^® and POLYCAT^®8 are manufactured by Air Products & Chemicals Inc.* Amine catalysts control the rate of the urethane reaction.

Metallic catalysts may also be included in rigid urethane foam formulations. T-12 or dibutyltin dilaurate manufactured by Air Products & Chemicals

*DABCO 33-LV^® and POLYCAT^®8 are registered trademarks of Air Products & Chemicals Inc.

Typical properties: DABCO 33-LV^® POLYCAT^®8

Specific gravity: 1.03 @ 24ºC 0.8512 @ 20°C

Boiling Point (°C): 174 160 @756 mmHg

Vapor pressure ! @ 38°C: 2 mmHg 9.77 mmHg

Appearance: clear, colorless-tocolorless liqu. straw liquid

Flash point: >110°C 40°C (ASTM

(PMCC) D56-70) (CC) Inc. and lead naphthanate are typical metallic catalysts. Metallic catalysts greatly increase the rate of the urethane polymerization. Metallic catalysts are necessary, for example, in spray foams where very short reaction times are required.

Premixes often contain at least one auxillary blowing agent. The premix compositions in accordance with the invention may contain at least one auxillary blowing agent. The auxillary blowing agent used in these premixes may be, for example, a fluorocarbon, an organic liquid, water or any combination of the above.

Auxillary blowing agents are used in

combination with a primary blowing agent for a variety of reasons. For example, water is sometimes employed as an auxillary blowing agent to help reduce the consumption of the primary blowing agent. Water also produces improved strength properties in rigid foam. Other materials including CFC's, HFC's, HCFC's and organic liquids have also been used as auxillary blowing agents with HCFC-141b, for example, to reduce consumption of HCFC-141b, reduce foam costs, improve foam properties and/or improve foam processing. Some of the most common CFC's, HFC's, HCFC's and organic liquids employed as auxillary blowing agents include trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11), dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12), methylene fluoride

(HFC-32), pentafluoroethane (HFC-125), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22), 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane

(HCFC-123), 1,2-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane

(HCFC-123a), 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane

(HCFC-124), methyl formate and methylene chloride. In premix compositions utilizing a

fluorocarbon or organic liquid as auxillary blowing agent in conjuction with HCFC-141b, HCFC-141b

generally comprises greater than 50 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used. In another embodiment utilizing a fluorocarbon or organic liquid as auxillary blowing agent in conjuction with

HCFC-141b in a premix composition, the HCFC-141b comprises greater than 70 percent of the total amount of .blowing agent used. In yet another embodiment utilizing a fluorocarbon or organic liquid as

auxillary blowing agent in conjuction with HCFC-141b in a premix composition, the HCFC-141b comprises greater than 50 and less than 70 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

In premix compositions utilizing water as the auxillary blowing agent in conjunction with

HCFC-141b, water generally comprises up to 2 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol used in the foam formulation.

In a preferred embodiment, in premix

compositions utilizing water as an auxillary blowing agent in conjunction with HCFC-141b, water generally comprises up to 1 part by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol used in the foam formulation.

In this next set of Examples the stability of HCFC-141b-auxillary blowing agent/polyol blends are compared with blends utilizing CFC-11 and HCFC-123 with the same auxillary blowing agents and polyols. The results confirm that blends utilizing HCFC-141b are substantially more stable than blends utilizing CFC-11 or HCFC-123. EXAMPLES C

All possible blends of the polyols listed in Table I above with the auxillary blowing agents listed in Table III below with each of HCFC-141b, CFC-11 and HCFC-123 are prepared and the stability of each blend is determined by repeating the experiment outlined in Examples A above. The results indicate that the HCFC-141b-auxillary blowing agent/polyol mixtures are significantly more stable than those of CFC-11 or HCFC-123. Specifically, the reduction in pH is significantly less in the HCFC-141b-auxillary blowing agent/polyol mixtures than in those mixtures employing CFC-11 or HCFC-123.

TABLE III

H₂O

Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)

Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) Methylene fluoride (HFC-32)

Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125)

1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)

Chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22) 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123)

1,2-dichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a)

1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124)

Methyl Formate

Methylene chloride

EXAMPLES D

All possible blends of the polyols and

auxillary blowing agents listed in Tables I and III respectively with each of HCFC-141b, CFC-11 and

HCFC-123 are prepared and the stability of each blend is determined by repeating the experiment outlined in Examples B above. The results indicate that the compositions employing HCFC-141b result in

substantially smaller acid generation in all cases relative to CFC-11 and HCFC-123 indicating that

HCFC-141b is more stable than CFC-11 and HCFC-123 in the tested compositions.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. Storage stable premixes comprising a polyether polyol and 1,1-dichloro-l-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

2. Storage stable premixes comprising a polyester polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

3. Storage stable premixes comprising a rigid polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

4. Storage stable premixes comprising a polyether polyol/polyester polyol blend and

1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

5. Storage stable premixes comprising a methyl glucoside-based polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

6. Storage stable premixes comprising a reactive brominated diol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

7. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said polyol is a sucrose-based polyether polyol.

8. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said polyol is a sucrose amine-based polyether polyol

9. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said polyol is an aromatic amine-based polyether polyol.

10. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said polyol is an aromatic initiator-based polyether polyol.

11. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said polyol is an amine-based polyether polyol.

12. The premixes of claim 2 wherein said polyol is an aromatic-based polyester polyol.

13. The premixes of claim 2 wherein said polyol is a polyethylene terephthalate-based

polyester polyol.

14. The premixes of claim 7 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^® polyol 975.

15. The premixes of claim 10 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^® polyol 824.

16. The premixes of claim 12 wherein said polyol is TERATE^®203.

17. The premixes of claim 12 wherein said polyol is STEPANOL^®PS-2502-A.

18. The premixes of claim 13 wherein said polyol is CHARDOL^®336-A.

19. The premixes of claim 6 wherein said diol is PHT4-DIOL.

20. The premixes of claim 9 wherein said polyol is THANOL^®R-350-X.

21. The premixes of claim 8 wherein said polyol is POLY-G^®71-357.

22. The premixes of claim 11 wherein said polyol is NIAX^®Polyol LA-700.

23. The premixes of claim 3 wherein said polyol is THANOL^®650-X.

24. The premixes of claim 4 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^® polyol 1114.

25. The premixes of claim 5 wherein said polyol is POLY-G^®75-442.

26. The premixes of claim 12 wherein said polyol is FOAMOL^®3500.

27. The premixes of claim 11 wherein said polyol is VORANOL^®800.

28. The premixes of claim 1 wherein said premixes additionally contain at least one auxillary blowing agent.

29. The premixes of claim 2 wherein said premixes additionally contain at least one auxillary blowing agent.

30. The premixes of claim 83 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is selected from the group consisting of trichlorofluoromethane,

dichlorodifluoromethane, methylene fluoride,

pentafluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, chlorodifluoromethane, 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,2-dichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1-chloro1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane and mixtures thereof.

31. The premixes of claim 84 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is selected from the group consisting of trichlorofluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, methylene fluoride, pentafluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, chlorodifluoromethane, 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,2-dichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane and mixtures thereof.

32. The premixes of claim 83 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 50 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

33. The premixes of claim 84 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 50 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

34. The premixes of claim 83 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 70 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

35. The premixes of claim 84 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 70 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

36. The premixes of claim 83 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 50 and less than 70 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

37. The premixes of claim 84 wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane comprises greater than 50 and less than 70 percent of the total amount of blowing agent used.

38. The premixes of claim 30 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is chlorodifluoromethane.

39. The premixes of claim 30 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2- trifluoroethane.

40. The premixes of claim 31 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is chlorodifluoromethane.

41. The premixes of claim 31 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2- trifluoroethane.

42. Premixes comprising a polyether polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions

suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

43. Premixes comprising a polyester polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions

suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

44. Premixes comprising a rigid polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

45. Premixes comprising a polyether

polyol/polyester polyol blend and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

46. Premixes comprising a methyl glucoside-based polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation.

47. Premixes comprising a reactive brominated diol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preraration.

48. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said polyol is a sucrose-based polyether polyol.

49. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said polyol is a sucrose amine-based polyether polyol.

50. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said polyol is an aromatic amine-based polyether polyol.

51. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said polyol is an aromatic initiator-based polyether polyol.

52. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said polyol is an amine-based polyether polyol.

53. The premixes of claim 43 wherein said polyol is an aromatic-based polyester polyol.

54. The premixes of claim 43 wherein said polyol is a polyethylene terephthalate-based polyester polyol.

55. The premixes of claim 48 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^® polyol 975.

56. The premixes of claim 51 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^®polyol 824.

57. The premixes of claim 53 wherein said polyol is TERATE^®203.

58. The premixes of claim 53 wherein said polyol is STEPANOL^®PS-2502-A.

59. The premixes of claim 54 wherein said polyol is CHARDOL^®336-A.

60. The premixes of claim 47 wherein said polyol is PHT4-DIOL.

61. The premixes of claim 50 wherein said polyol is THANOL^®R-350-X.

62. The premixes of claim 46 wherein said polyol is POLY-G^®71-357.

63. The premixes of claim 52 wherein said polyol is NIAX^®Polyol LA-700.

64. The premixes of claim 44 wherein said polyol is THANOL^®650-X.

65. The premixes of claim 45 wherein said polyol is PLURACOL^® polyol 1114.

66. The premixes of claim 46 wherein said polyol is POLY-G^®75-442.

67. The premixes of claim 53 wherein said polyol is FOAMOL^®3500.

68. The premixes of claim 52 wherein said polyol is VORANOL^®800.

69. The premixes of claim 48 wherein said polyol is VORANOL^® 370.

70. The premixes of claim 42 wherein said premixes comprise a polyether polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for

polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam preparatiin.

71. The premixes of claim 43 wherein said premixes comprise a polyester polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for

polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluproethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam preparation.

72. The premixes of claim 44 wherein said premixes comprise a rigid polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for

polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam preparation.

73. The premixes of claim 45 wherein said premixes comprise a polyether polyol/polyester polyol blend and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam

preparation.

74. The premixes of claim 46 wherein said premixes comprise a methyl glucoside-based polyol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam preparation.

75. The premixes of claim 47 wherein said premixes comprise a reactive brominated diol and 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane in proportions suitable for polyurethane or polyisocyanurate foam preparation wherein said 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane is the only blowing agent used in the foam preparation.

76. The premixes of claim 70 wherein said polyol is a sucrose-based polyether polyol.

77. The premixes of claim 70 wherein said polyol is a sucrose amine-based polyether polyol.

78. The premixes of claim 70 wherein said polyol is an aromatic amine-based polyether polyol.

79. The premixes of claim 70 wherein said polyol is an aromatic initiator-based polyether polyol.

80. The premixes of claim 70 wherein said polyol is an amine-based polyether polyol.

81. The premixes of claim 71 wherein said polyol is an aromatic-based polyester polyol.

82. The premixes of claim 71 wherein said polyol is a polyethylene terephthalate-based polyester polyol.

83. The premixes of claim 28 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is a fluorocarbon.

84. The premixes of claim 29 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is a fluorocarbon.

85. The premixes of claim 28 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is water.

86. The premixes of claim 29 wherein said auxillary blowing agent is water.

87. The premixes of claim 85 wherein water comprises up to 2 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol.

88. The premixes of claim 85 wherein water comprises up to 1 part by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol.

89. The premixes of claim 86 wherein water comprises up to 2 part by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol.

90. The premixes of claim 86 wherein water comprises up to 1 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol.