[go: up one dir, main page]

Jones et al., 1995 - Google Patents

Next-generation 3D videosystems may improve laparoscopic task performance

Jones et al., 1995

Document ID
1435415747268078677
Author
Jones D
Brewer J
Soper N
Publication year
Publication venue
Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare

External Links

Snippet

Laparoscopic surgeons may be hindered during complex procedures by the two- dimensional (2-D) view provided by standard videosystems. Firstgeneration three- dimensional (3-D) systems have been developed with the hope of improved laparoscopic …
Continue reading at books.google.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06—Needles ; Sutures; Needle-suture combinations; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B2017/06057—Double-armed sutures, i.e. sutures having a needle attached to each end
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/0469—Suturing instruments for use in minimally invasive surgery, e.g. endoscopic surgery
    • A61B2017/0474—Knot pushers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A61B17/3417—Details of tips or shafts, e.g. grooves, expandable, bendable; Multiple coaxial sliding cannulas, e.g. for dilating
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A61B5/4887—Locating particular structures in or on the body
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B1/00—Instruments for performing medical examinations of the interior of cavities or tubes of the body by visual or photographical inspection, e.g. endoscopes; Illuminating arrangements therefor
    • A61B1/00002—Operational features of endoscopes
    • A61B1/00043—Operational features of endoscopes provided with signal output arrangements
    • A61B1/00045—Display arrangement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/0016—Operational features thereof
    • A61B3/0033—Operational features thereof characterised by user input arrangements

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jones et al. The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance
Storz et al. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks
Dion et al. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems
Wagner et al. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method
McDOUGALL et al. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
Harada et al. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks
Jones et al. Next-generation 3D videosystems may improve laparoscopic task performance
Patel et al. Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment
Chan et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery
Durrani et al. Three-dimensional video imaging for endoscopic surgery
Bogdanova et al. Depth perception of surgeons in minimally invasive surgery
Birkett et al. A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery
Mashiach et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons
Spille et al. 2D versus 3D in laparoscopic surgery by beginners and experts: a randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps
Guanà et al. Skills comparison in pediatric residents using a 2-dimensional versus a 3-dimensional high-definition camera in a pediatric laparoscopic simulator
Singh et al. Three-dimensional endoscopy in sinus surgery
Peitgen et al. A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy
Schoenthaler et al. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model
Hassan et al. Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator
Champion et al. Teaching basic video skills as an aid in laparoscopic suturing
Kozlov et al. 3D laparoscopy in neonates and infants
Gallagher et al. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance
Rodrigues et al. Tying different knots: what forces do we use?
Avinash et al. Evaluation of increasing camera baseline on depth perception in surgical robotics
Öbek et al. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training