[go: up one dir, main page]

Jones et al., 1996 - Google Patents

The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance

Jones et al., 1996

Document ID
4866027999699607685
Author
Jones D
Brewer J
Soper N
Publication year
Publication venue
Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques

External Links

Snippet

Many laparoscopic surgeons feel constrained by the two-dimensional (2-D) view provided by video monitors. Video-eye-hand coordination is further complicated by the diminished tactile feedback blunted by elongated instruments. Video systems capable of receiving and …
Continue reading at journals.lww.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06—Needles ; Sutures; Needle-suture combinations; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/02—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
    • A61B3/028—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing visual acuity; for determination of refraction, e.g. phoropters
    • A61B3/032—Devices for presenting test symbols or characters, e.g. test chart projectors
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/0016—Operational features thereof
    • A61B3/0033—Operational features thereof characterised by user input arrangements
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B1/00—Instruments for performing medical examinations of the interior of cavities or tubes of the body by visual or photographical inspection, e.g. endoscopes; Illuminating arrangements therefor
    • A61B1/00002—Operational features of endoscopes
    • A61B1/00043—Operational features of endoscopes provided with signal output arrangements
    • A61B1/00045—Display arrangement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jones et al. The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance
Byrn et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System
Storz et al. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks
Crosthwaite et al. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two‐and three‐dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery
Patel et al. Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment
Votanopoulos et al. Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training
US6887082B2 (en) Laparoscopic trainer
Dion et al. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy: influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems
Wagner et al. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method
Gallagher et al. PicSOr: an objective test of perceptual skill that predicts laparoscopic technical skill in three initial studies of laparoscopopic performance
Tendick et al. Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot‐tying task
Spille et al. 2D versus 3D in laparoscopic surgery by beginners and experts: a randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps
Mashiach et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons
Jones et al. Next-generation 3D videosystems may improve laparoscopic task performance
CN110390851A (en) Augmented Reality Training System
JP2000512027A (en) Surgical training instrument using reflection video endoscope
Peitgen et al. A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy
Schoenthaler et al. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model
Guanà et al. Skills comparison in pediatric residents using a 2-dimensional versus a 3-dimensional high-definition camera in a pediatric laparoscopic simulator
Lagrange et al. Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy
Hassan et al. Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator
Kozlov et al. 3D laparoscopy in neonates and infants
Gallagher et al. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance
Rodrigues et al. Tying different knots: what forces do we use?
Avinash et al. Evaluation of increasing camera baseline on depth perception in surgical robotics