Been receiving money from them for the…
Been receiving money from them for the past 1.5 years, excellent service. I never had any issues with receiving and withdrawals of my money. I would 100% recommend them
Reply from Grey
Ghana
Review of Grey
Been receiving money from them for the past 1.5 years, excellent service. I never had any issues with receiving and withdrawals of my money. I would 100% recommend them
Reply from Grey
Review of uTest
I’ve spent a good amount of time on uTest and my experience with their payout model has been very frustrating.
The biggest issue is the lack of predictability. You can read the scope carefully, target focus areas, avoid duplicates, and submit a well documented bug with clear reproduction steps and evidence, and still get “Somewhat Valuable” for $1.25. That does not reflect the time and effort required to produce a valid report.
Reproductions are another major problem. Testers are encouraged to reproduce existing issues, which still takes real time and proper documentation, but there is no payout for it. You are doing validation work that directly helps the client, yet you are not compensated at all.
The review time is also extremely slow. I’ve had bugs sit for weeks without being triaged. During that time you have no idea whether you will be paid, how much you will be paid, or if the bug will be even approved or not. For freelancers who track their time, this makes the platform unreliable.
Bug payouts are also very poor. After waiting that long for triage, the final amount often does not match the effort that went into the report. The minimum payout is far too low compared to the minimum work required to submit a valid bug.
I know the platform is aware of these issues but does not prioritize testers. If tester experience mattered, triage would be faster so people know what they’ve earned within a reasonable time.
On other platforms, bugs are reviewed by the end of the test cycle and payment becomes predictable, with escalation processes if clients are slow. That shows respect for testers’ time. On uTest, it often feels like you do the work, the client benefits from it, and then you just wait with no clarity.
That is not sustainable for anyone treating testing as real freelance work.
Review of Digivante Community
Don't be fooled by the positive reviews, if you're wondering why they have such high ratings here, it’s because one of the requirements for getting drawn in their monthly 50 pounds draw is give a review here and ofcourse anyone would give a positive review.
This is one of the worst testing platforms you would like to work at, here's why:
1. Absurdly low payouts, you get invited to cycles where functional bugs pay 1 GBP regardless of the impact of the bug, so if i report a crash bug and another tester reports an irrelevant link doesn't doesn't trigger any action, we all get paid the same amount , this makes no sense and seeks to abuse the efforts of testers.
There's also a policy which they don't state anywhere in their rules when signing up about bug payouts reducing after the bugs submitted reaches a specific amount, there's no clear indication on what specific number of bugs triggers this reduction and how much the reduction will, it just happens.
I had to contact them in discord to find out why the stated bug payouts suddenly reduced before i got an explanation. Their goal was to ensure testers submit bugs as early as possible but this makes no sense, this means they don't really care about quality issues and don't reward quality.
I have worked on several testing platforms and this is the worst of them all in terms of bug payouts, its literally slave money being paid here.
2. There is no incentive in increasing your ranking on the platform because they don't even have enough projects to offer.
3. You will be competing against testers from Asia and Nigeria who basically cheat in every test cycle, submitting incomplete bug reports, placeholders and whatever they can so they get the highest payouts as soon as possible. This leads to every test cycle having several bugs getting submitted in a matter of minutes.
The platform clearly does not care about providing a structured environment to ensure testers give their best.
I will conclude with this, if you want to slave away your time and effort, you can sign up to this platform and do so. If you do value your time and efforts, DO NOT join this platform. It's the worst you can find.
Review of test IO
The best testing platform hands down, they might not be as big as Utest but they will provide you with opportunities to earn and grow. There is transparency in what it takes to level up, their support team is also good at solving any issues testers have. The biggest complaint I see about this platform is that there aren’t much testcases and that most of them are exploratory, well that sounds like a skill issue. If you have strong bug hunting skills, hard work ethic, the ability to follow rules accurately and passion for testing. This is the right place for you.
Reply from test IO