Avis sur Difmark.com


Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

La réponse de Difmark ne traite…

La réponse de Difmark ne traite toujours pas le problème principal.

L’annonce mentionnait l’utilisation d’un proxy et l’activation directement dans Kaspersky, mais **elle n’indiquait pas que l’abonnement serait associé à un compte My Kaspersky tiers (ang******@boyanfdw.live)** que je ne possède pas et ne contrôle pas.

J’ai suivi toutes les instructions et testé deux clés. J’ai ensuite essayé d’ouvrir un litige avant la validation automatique de la commande, mais **le système de réclamation de Difmark ne fonctionnait pas** : mes preuves étaient téléchargées, mais le bouton « CONTINUEZ » ne fonctionnait pas et la page du support restait blanche. J’ai conservé les captures d’écran.

Malgré cela, Difmark défend la position du vendeur et me demande de continuer à tester d’autres clés au lieu de traiter ma demande de remboursement.

Je ne peux pas affirmer ce qui se passe en interne entre Difmark et le vendeur, mais **mon expérience me donne clairement l’impression que le vendeur est davantage protégé que le client**.

J’ai toutes les preuves : captures Kaspersky, compte tiers, conversations avec le vendeur, demande de remboursement et dysfonctionnement du système de litige.

⚠️ **Au vu de mon expérience, je ne recommande pas d’acheter sur cette plateforme. Soyez très prudents, particulièrement pour les licences de logiciels.**

Difmark's response still does not address the main issue.

The listing mentioned proxy activation and direct activation in Kaspersky, but it **did not disclose that the subscription would be associated with a third-party My Kaspersky account (ang******@boyanfdw.live)** that I do not own or control.

I followed all instructions and tested two keys. I then tried to open a dispute before the automatic completion deadline, but **Difmark's dispute system did not work**: my evidence was uploaded, but the “CONTINUE” button did not work and the support page remained blank. I have screenshots documenting this.

Despite this, Difmark continues to defend the seller's position and asks me to keep testing more keys instead of addressing my refund request.

I cannot claim what happens internally between Difmark and the seller, but **my experience gives me the clear impression that the seller is being protected more than the customer**.

I have evidence of everything: Kaspersky screenshots, the third-party account, conversations with the seller, my refund request, and the malfunctioning dispute system.

⚠️ **Based on my experience, I cannot recommend buying from this marketplace. Be very careful, especially when purchasing software licenses.**

رد Difmark لا يعالج حتى الآن المشكلة الأساسية.

صحيح أن الإعلان ذكر استعمال Proxy والتفعيل مباشرة داخل Kaspersky، لكنه **لم يوضح أن الاشتراك سيتم ربطه بحساب My Kaspersky تابع لطرف ثالث (ang******@boyanfdw.live)**، وهو حساب لا أملكه ولا أتحكم فيه.

اتبعت جميع تعليمات البائع وجربت مفتاحين مختلفين. بعد ذلك حاولت فتح نزاع قبل انتهاء مهلة التأكيد التلقائي للطلب، لكن **نظام الشكايات في Difmark لم يعمل**: تم رفع أدلتي بنجاح، لكن زر “CONTINUE” لم يعمل، كما ظهرت صفحة الدعم فارغة. ولدي صور تثبت ذلك.

ورغم ذلك، تستمر Difmark في الدفاع عن موقف البائع وتطلب مني تجربة المزيد من المفاتيح بدلاً من معالجة طلبي باسترجاع المبلغ.

لا يمكنني الجزم بما يحدث داخلياً بين Difmark والبائع، لكن **تجربتي تعطيني انطباعاً واضحاً بأن حماية البائع تحظى بأولوية أكبر من حماية الزبون**.

لدي جميع الأدلة: صور Kaspersky، الحساب التابع لطرف ثالث، المحادثات مع البائع، طلب استرجاع المبلغ، وصور تعطل نظام النزاع.

⚠️ **بناءً على تجربتي الشخصية، لا أنصح بالشراء من هذه المنصة، وأدعو الجميع إلى توخي الحذر الشديد، خصوصاً عند شراء تراخيص البرامج.**

Difmark 的回复仍然没有解决最主要的问题。

商品说明确实提到了使用 Proxy(代理)以及直接在 Kaspersky 软件中激活,但是**并没有明确说明订阅会与第三方 My Kaspersky 账户(ang******@boyanfdw.live)关联**。这个账户不属于我,我也无法控制它。

我按照卖家的全部要求操作,并测试了两个不同的密钥。之后,我在订单自动确认期限结束之前尝试提交争议,但 **Difmark 的争议系统无法正常工作**:证据已经成功上传,但是“CONTINUE”按钮无法使用,客服页面也一直显示空白。我保留了相关截图作为证据。

尽管如此,Difmark 仍然在维护卖家的立场,并要求我继续测试更多密钥,而没有真正处理我的退款请求。

我无法断言 Difmark 与卖家内部之间存在什么关系,但是**根据我的实际经历,我明显感觉卖家得到的保护比消费者更多**。

我保留了完整证据,包括 Kaspersky 截图、第三方账户信息、与卖家的聊天记录、退款请求以及 Difmark 争议系统无法正常工作的截图。

⚠️ **根据我的个人经历,我不推荐在这个平台购买商品。特别是购买软件许可证时,请大家务必谨慎。**

25 août 2026
Avis spontané

Réponse de Difmark.com

Dear Customer

We understand how unsettling it can feel when a software activation doesn't go the way you expected, and we appreciate you laying out your experience in such detail.

Looking into this order, the offer for this Kaspersky Premium key was clear from the start: activation happens directly inside the Kaspersky application rather than through Kaspersky's own web portal, a proxy step is part of that activation flow, and the key cannot be redeemed through the portal — all of this was stated in the Offer Details before checkout and repeated by the seller throughout your conversation. This is a standard activation method for this type of key and does not change the edition, term, or coverage you paid for.

On the specific message you saw referencing a third party during activation: this relates to how this particular key was provisioned by the distributor, not to anything withheld from you at the point of purchase. The seller offered a replacement key once your first attempt didn't go through, and the conversation stayed open and active rather than being dropped.

Regarding the dispute submission — we're sorry the page didn't behave as expected when you tried to upload your evidence. That's not the normal experience, and it deserves a direct look from our technical team rather than being read as how disputes are generally handled here. Every dispute that reaches our team is reviewed on its own merits, regardless of who filed it.

Difmark works only with verified sellers operating under one set of platform rules, and this order remains open to proper review. We'd encourage you to continue in the seller chat on order #3758304 so the activation issue can be resolved directly, and to flag the submission problem to our support team so we can confirm what happened on our side. We want to make sure this gets a real resolution, not just a repeated explanation.