PA

Paul

United States

Reviews

Review of DKB | Deutsche Kreditbank AG


Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Zero customer support

What other banks provide as standard, DKB claims is impossible. That is assuming you can make contact. They removed their customer service number from the website, so you can only contact them if you happen to remember what it was. Quite simply, your money is not safe here, because the moment something goes wrong, you have no recourse. Their incompetence has cost me many thousands of Euro and I strongly advise anyone who banks with them to move their money to a safe location.

14 March 2025
Unprompted review

Review of Travelex UK


Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Nice idea, shame about the dangerously poor implementation

I ordered a Globe Cash Passport to withdraw cash from ATMs while abroad. The card arrived a few days later with a welcome letter and a copy of the terms and conditions; so far so good.

The letter instructed me to dial a phone number to activate the card. I navigated the automated menu until I was forwarded to another phone system. After five minutes on hold I was abruptly disconnected. I tried again. This time, I made it through to another automated system that asked for the 16 digit number printed on my card. That number is incorrect...that number is incorrect...that number is incorrect...that number is incorrect...the system refused to activate my card.

I was about to try Google when I noticed a phone number printed on the back of the card. Worth a try? It connected me to an identical automated system, only this one had a British accent instead of a US one. This system was happy to take my number and activate the card, so clearly they are printing the wrong phone number on the welcome letter - thanks Travelex!

That out of the way, it was time to set up my online account to check my balance. I made it through the maze of bizarre, antiquated web pages until they asked for my phone number. That number doesn't match our records...that number doesn't match our records...that number doesn't match our records. Hey, Travelex, how about giving me a clue as to the format you would like it in? Or maybe you'd like to try properly validating your online forms? I tried +44, I tried 0044, I tried a leading 0. No, the correct answer was no leading zero and no country code. Obviously...

That was exhausting! Time to try topping up the card I suppose? Hmmm...no, the online account doesn't have that facility. WHAT!?!? What year is this? If this system was a GCSE IT project, I would consider it to be unfinished.

Topping up is handled by a separate system that requires you to enter the full 16 digit Cash Passport number and all of your personal and bank details EVERY SINGLE TIME. Great work, guys! Unfortunately, every page of this monstrosity is encrypted with obsolete protocols, which you could almost get away with, except that the encryption on the final page (which is where you enter your bank details) is TOTALLY BROKEN.

I'm surprised to find a financial institution with weak and broken encryption that hasn't made headline news for a hacking scandal, but perhaps I'm the only customer to have waded this far through the Travelex quagmire. Needless to say, I won't be entering my bank details. I'll pay my bank's exorbitant foreign transaction fees, cancel my Globe Cash Passport on my return home, and try to forget that I ever heard the name 'Travelex'.

EDIT 16/04/2015 FOLLOWING TRAVELEX REPLY:

Travelex - "...this would be the same telephone number found on the back of the card."

The number in the letter and the number on the card are different. The number on the card worked, the number in the letter did not. It was obvious the numbers connected me to different systems.

Travelex - "When accessing a SHA-1 protected site in Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox, both browsers currently affirm that the site is secure, and can be trusted."

While I'm not thrilled about SHA-1, it wouldn't stop me using the website. My problem is that the page where you enter the payment details is not fully protected. This error is not related to the use of SHA-1; it is caused by incorrect implementation. The issue can be seen in Chrome, Firefox, Safari...any modern browser.

Travelex - "Travelex already performs regular security tests against it's web sites, using a specialist security testing partner. These tests would immediately identify any instances of ineffectual encryption functionality."

Get a Globe Cash Passport, try to top it up online, and see the problem for yourself. Once again, this is not SHA-1 related; this is a separate issue that occurs only on the page where you enter your payment details. It is very easy to test because it happens every time. The page is still broken as of today (16/04/2015).

Travelex - "In conclusion, Travelex takes the security of it's customer's data seriously, and does not consider the current support for SHA-1 to pose a significant, material risk."

Fair enough, I concede the point about SHA-1, but there is still the issue of the broken encryption on the payment page.

22 March 2015
Unprompted review

Reply from Travelex UK

Dear Paul,

Thank you for taking the time to review your experience with Travelex.

We are really sorry to hear about the great deal of difficulty you faced when trying to utilise your Globe Cash Passport - we aim to provide a streamlined service to our customers and regret that you feel this isn't the case in regards to our Cash Passport systems.

The telephone numbers in question were reviewed and no issues were found - you would select Option 1 for English and then Option 2 to activate the card - this would be the same telephone number found on the back of the card.

Regarding the encryption issues, in September last year, Google announced that they would begin pro-actively downgrading their support for legacy SHA-1 hashed digital certificates. Google indicated that this would be a gradual process, with successive versions of their Chrome browser displaying incrementally-serious indications of the level of trust for SHA-1 certificates, from "secure, but with minor errors", through "neutral, lacking security" to "affirmatively insecure".

This approach differed significantly from the rest of the security, and browser industry, where SHA-1 usage had been deemed acceptable until 2016, when it would no longer be trusted and should be superseded by SHA-256. When accessing a SHA-1 protected site in Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox, both browsers currently affirm that the site is secure, and can be trusted.

On learning of Google's new approach, Travelex implemented a digital certificate refresh programme across all it's global websites, with certificates which were due to expire and be routinely renewed, using SHA-256 alternatives. Any certificates which are not due to expire are being systematically replaced, and the programme is expected to be completed mid-2015 - well ahead of the 2016 deadline.

In addition, Travelex already performs regular security tests against it's web sites, using a specialist security testing partner. These tests would immediately identify any instances of ineffectual encryption functionality.

In conclusion, Travelex takes the security of it's customer's data seriously, and does not consider the current support for SHA-1 to pose a significant, material risk. As always, we welcome the opportunity to discuss customers concerns on this, or any other security issues in greater detail.

Your feedback has been thoroughly reviewed by various teams who will work to better the service in regards to your comments. We hope you can accept our most sincere apologies for the inconvenience and hope you will reconsider Travelex for future travel money requirements.

Should you have further enquiries or issues you'd like to discuss, please do not hesitate to contact us via e-mail at TrustPilot@Travelex.com or on 0845 8727 627 quoting helpdesk reference number SC1778537.

Kindest Regards,
Online Support Team