SoundCampaign Reviews 

My first experience of using SoundCampaign to promote one of my songs has been both positive and successful.
I am about as independent as a music artist as you can get and as an amateur singer songwriter without a publisher I needed someone with connections to push my song to the right Spotify playlist curators who might be interested in my unique style and sound.
Within four days of signing up they had me on three playlists so I am more than happy with that result.
I will use them again for sure.
When you have your own style and play your own music it’s not always easy finding listeners so I am grateful to SoundCampaign for helping me out.

Sound Campaigns sent my new release out quickly to playlisters and I got added quickly. My mistake was not being more selective in picking the proper genres that categorized my tune. They listened to the song and sent it to the appropriate playlists. Doing that got me the adds I needed. In this day and age it’s very important to cross all t’s and dot the i’s and they helped me achieve that.

Don't waste your money!! I got great results with another company who emailed me out of the blue. They charged me about £90 or something and I've gone from about 6 monthly listeners to 4k.
So I thought I'd give Soundcampaign a try. All I get is feedback emails, all of which look automated and generic. Totally wasted my money for nothing, didn't get a single stream from this scam.

Sound Campaign is a valuable tool for independent artists who want to confidently pitch their music to the right audiences and gather real market insights.
It has been of great help, and I really recommend it! Amazing Job!

Dear Nadav,

Thank you for your message. However, I must be candid with you: I am genuinely disappointed with the return on my investment with SoundCampaign so far.

The campaign did not deliver the results I expected in terms of streams, engagement, or meaningful growth for my artist profile. While I appreciate the offer of a Spotify profile review and the promise of exposure, I feel that what was promised upfront did not align with what was actually delivered.

I am not comfortable leaving a 5-star review at this time, as it would not reflect my honest experience. I believe in constructive feedback, and mine is that the campaign needs to show more tangible value before asking for public endorsements.

I am open to discussing this further if you genuinely want to understand my perspective and improve your service.

Regards,
Ecio

There is no room for somewhat experimental music. The curators seem to reply woth use of ai. I very much do NOT recommend this

It is not easy to get through all the noice out there today. As a new artist it feels impossible sometimes. This thing which SoundCampaign has got going helps me a bit on the way, at least at Spotify. If nobody knows you exist, how can they find your music? You pay SoundCampaign some money and some curators listen to your music, if they like what they hear your music will turn up on new lists at Spotify. It’s not very expensive and it helped my a bit on the way. /Sacre

Absolutely useless service. You pay money for curators to leave comments, even when they don’t add your track to their playlists. On top of that, the tracks are often sent to completely irrelevant curators and playlists — not matching the language or even the musical direction. Some curators even say that the track doesn’t fit their category, which raises the question of why it was sent to them in the first place.

As a result, the money simply gets spent on random feedback and irrelevant playlist submissions, while nothing meaningful happens for the artist. I did not pay for someone to simply comment on my track. I paid for relevant curator exposure and real playlist opportunities. In my experience, this service was absolutely not worth the money.

I have changed my write up. I really do think these companies might be using average independents to make money. My thoughts are they all are only sharing artists who are already a package. Basically milking the average artist and working for the industry still. I base this on what i feel were not genuine reviews from the curators, also the response of this company to my chat. I'm not denying that i wasn't suitable to their curators. I don't think the reviews matched the scores and each of them seemed to have different reasons that should be universal. What is considered good or not good is usually universal. Nah, i would not again pay any of these companies. Maybe make a fun clip and use YouTube promotion, or do your own social media campaign.

At first I wasn’t as pleased because it felt like the comments were very generic and curators were just looking for an excuse to not place your song. However, now that I gave it another try I must say I’m happy with the result. Even tho I did not get placed in as much playlist as I wanted I was very happy with the fact that the ones I got placed in have a lot in common with my music and the path I’m taking as artists. The service feels so much more personalised towards the artists. It’s great that now they have a much better follow through system, that checks on you during and after the campaign has finalised. With that being said I should also add that sound camping has the best quality-price ratio. You get what you paid for. I would strongly suggest you try Soundcampaign

soundcamps terrible If you are talking about the music promotion platform, SoundCampaign (often referred to via its domain soundcamps.com), many artists agree with you that it can feel like a massive waste of money. While the service is technically legitimate, users frequently call it "terrible" or even a "scam" because you pay premium prices with absolutely no guarantee of results.Artists routinely complain about the platform for several reasons:High cost, zero placement: You can easily spend $80 to $150+ only for playlist curators to completely reject your track, leaving you with absolutely nothing to show for your money.No refunds: If curators decline your song, SoundCampaign keeps your money anyway, offering no partial or full refunds.Low-effort feedback: When a song is rejected, curators often copy-paste generic, automated-sounding critiques that offer no real value.Temporary spikes: Even if you do get placed, the streams frequently dry up the exact moment your paid campaign ends

love the team

Easy, real and very straightforward.

Half the budget going on curators telling you « the sound doesn’t suit the playlist »… which clearly means the algorithm doesn’t choose well

This is the second campaign we are going throu and each time we got fast responses.
Instructions are pretty much clear and helpfull so anyobe can really find the right spot for its own track.
Feedback from the curators, even if the track is not added in a playlist, is really helpfull for the future.
Good work and service. I will recommend it. Thanks.

As someone who does A&R, management,and marketing consulting for a ton of artists of all kinds I have tried every possible pitching platform to get streams. Some of them are good- some- not good.

And after all my experiences I am positive that Sound Campaign gets results- not just in getting my clients placed - but in getting them placed on meaningful playlists that get real streams. And that is the real goal for playlist pitching.

Chris Long
Chris Long MGMT

great experience easy to use great feedback from curators and creators alike

the company is making it easy to find your way throuout the website

I discovered SoundCampaign on MelodicMind, where Sara Lee rated them 9.8 for safety, placements, and value for money. As a newcomer to Spotify, I decided to try them based on Lee's positive comments. I conducted two campaigns with them, and here’s my perspective on their service.

They are quite pricey, and your budget depletes rapidly. My first campaign was a trial with a $100 budget, which was exhausted in one day, resulting in 2 playlist placements and six feedback comments. Upon checking the playlist curators on Spotify, it appeared that the follower counts listed on SoundCampaign were exaggerated. For example, Mbti Music has 13,662 followers on Spotify, yet they claim 94,318 followers when providing feedback through SoundCampaign. Similarly, RED 32 has 227 followers on Spotify, but they assert having 141,536 followers on SoundCampaign.

Moreover, SoundCampaign does not market your music effectively. They fail to target the best curators for your music genre and even send your tracks to foreign curators who do not speak English, despite instructions to only target English-speaking curators.

Overall, my experience with them was rather lukewarm, and I don’t believe they merit the 9.8 rating given by MelodicMind. You will end up spending a considerable amount of money with minimal return if you use this company. My best advice is to look elsewhere.

I signed up to the service easily - then got the AI bots asking me "why" I hadn't joined the service ..... 🙄Not the best start - eventually I got a message stating there were problems with the " system" that's why I was recieving the wrong messaging - not a apology - this particular AI service obviously didn't make mistakes,nor was apologetic - this making me feel like I had done something incorrectly!
The service ( matching playlists to my track )was swift --pricing wise ( which don't get mentioned))- worked out to over £10 a submission to a playlist - 🤔
180 dollars for 13 submissions .!!!
The reviews were varied and informative - conflicting as everyone is different .
Prepare for a lot of eye rolling & exasperation from these " playlisters" - they are in control !!!
They can tell you the production is not good and Mark it as 2.5 - they don't realise it's a multi Grammy award winner responsible for production of some of the worlds biggest selling music ever !!!
They know best !!!
Overall I think expensive for what you get - it's a gamble !!!!
I got a lot more from Submit Hub !
As a guide note ......:)