Han Sheng, Chien

An insightful article on Alex Chua, one of the Singapore financial leaders I deeply respect, and GB Helios. His point that organizations need intentional slack especially stood out to me. Not every resource needs to be utilized at 100%. Sometimes, leaving room is what enables new opportunities and better decisions. A thoughtful perspective on leadership and growth. #GBHelios #Leadership #Singapore https://lnkd.in/p/ggYxdWer

10

2 Kommentare

The report landed on time. The decision still felt late. At a large Asia insurance BU, the chain looked healthy. Country PMO → portfolio → BU consolidation. Packs were going out every cycle. But by the time leadership opened them, the ground had already moved. So I stopped arguing about slide format and mapped the flow. What looked like delay was data latency. Manual consolidation at every layer. Different tools in different countries. No single source of truth. The evidence was simple: 3–4 weeks from country input to BU insight. 300+ hours a month spent stitching packs by hand. CXO views that could be more than a month old. The lesson I still use: a reporting process can look busy and still fail the decision. Fix the data path first. Templates come second. When your Friday pack is “done,” how old is the data underneath? #PMO #DeliveryOps #ExecutiveReporting #AIinPMO

9

🍿 What if your health insurance worked like Netflix? Instead of a yearly policy you forget about, imagine paying a small monthly subscription that gives you instant access to doctors, physiotherapy, and preventive care all from your phone. No paperwork. No claims. No waiting. That’s exactly what Bupa Hong Kong created with Blua Health Pass a $32/month plan that connects users to a full digital health ecosystem. Just like you open Netflix to stream movies, this plan lets you stream your health. 🎬 But here’s the smart part it syncs with your smartwatch ⌚️, tracks your heart rate, sleep, and activity,and alerts you before small issues become big problems. It’s not reactive insurance anymore it’s preventive and predictive. 🇸🇦 🇸🇦🇸🇦❤️❤️ Now imagine this in Saudi Arabia. We already have the perfect environment: young people obsessed with wellness and wearables everywhere Apple Watch, Galaxy Watch, Fitbit, you name it. So why not link insurance to daily habits? Imagine a Saudi app connecting insurers, digital clinics, and wearables rewarding you when your health improves: better sleep, more steps, balanced blood pressure. And it’s not just for employees it opens access for freelancers, university students, delivery drivers, and anyone without employer coverage. Even better, it could reduce misuse among older users who over-claim or refill unnecessary prescriptions. We already have early models: Bupa’s E-Clinic (عيادتي), Med by Tawuniya, and Al Nahdi Digital Clinics. All we need now is the missing link a Smart Insurance Network connecting prevention, data, and rewards. 🚀 The future of insurance won’t ask, “What’s your illness?” It’ll ask, “What did you do today to stay healthy?” #Insurance #HealthInsurance #InsurTech #DigitalHealth #HealthTech #WearableTech #SmartInsurance #Innovation #Wellness #PreventiveCare #Freelancers #UniversityStudents #ElderlyCare #SaudiArabia #Vision2030 #DigitalTransformation #SmartHealth #FutureOfInsurance #RiskManagement

5

5 Kommentare

I recently read an interesting development from Taiwan’s insurance industry. Two major life insurance companies — Shin Kong Life and Taishin Life — have finalised their merger and will now operate as a single combined entity. What does this merger actually mean? A merger is simply two strong companies coming together to form one stronger organisation. Think of it like a cricket team where a top batsman and a top bowler join forces — the overall team becomes more powerful. That’s exactly what’s happening here. Why did these companies decide to merge? By combining, the new insurance company will: • Have a larger customer base • Possess stronger capital and financial stability • Achieve better operational efficiency • Compete more effectively with other large insurers • Reduce duplication and improve scale In short: 10 + 10 = a much stronger 25 Impact on the insurance market Both companies already had significant market share in Taiwan. After the merger, the combined entity will command an even larger share of the life insurance market, making it a dominant player in the industry. This also raises the entry barrier for new or smaller insurers, increasing competitive pressure across the market. What does this mean for customers? For policyholders, this is largely positive: • Existing policies continue without disruption • Improved service quality over time • Wider product offerings • A stronger insurer means greater safety of policyholders’ money Why this matters from a business & finance perspective This merger reflects a broader consolidation trend in the insurance industry: • Growth in insurance markets globally has slowed • Low interest rates and high regulatory pressure are challenging insurers • Scale and capital strength matter more than ever We’re seeing similar patterns not just in Taiwan, but across Asia, where insurance growth has moderated and consolidation is becoming a strategic necessity. By merging, Shin Kong Life and Taishin Life can leverage each other’s resources, improve resilience, and position themselves for long-term sustainable growth. Zurich Insurance Insurance Investor Kotak Life Moody's - Insurance Solutions SBI Securities Zurich Insurance Nordic HDFC Life

3

Very embarassing for Singapore's NTUC Income: "Income Insurance axes sale of platform to Embed after firm allegedly failed to make CPF payments". "Income Insurance has terminated the proposed sale of Hive, its digital insurance platform, to Singapore-headquartered fintech firm Embed Financial Group Holdings (EFGH). The decision came after the fintech firm was taken to court for allegedly failing to make mandatory CPF contributions for six employees. EFGH was founded in 2024 by Dennis Ng, its executive chairman and group chief executive who previously held senior roles at Prudential, Allianz and Citi." Embarassing that a firm created by such so-called industry experts can't even get the fundamentals right and pay their staff's salaries! Also how can they not pay CPF or salaries but pay for sponsorships? "NTUC understands from affected union members that they had not received the salaries due to them, said an NTUC spokesperson. Earlier in 2026, EFGH was named partner for the BYD Singapore International Marathon in December, and announced a five-year sponsorship partnership with the Singapore National Olympic Council. EFGH also extended its sponsorship of the Tour de France Singapore Criterium for three more years after coming on board in 2025, with the race returning on Nov 7 and 8." Voodoo economics going on here and doesn't look like NTUC Income had any control or oversight as to what was going on and yet had 100% responsibility for it! "According to charge sheets seen by ST, EFGH failed to pay CPF contributions for the month of March 2026. TADM had received six salary claims lodged against EFGH and was working with the relevant parties to resolve the claims through mediation." What do you think? It’s time to invest in your Personal Branding: If you’re going to invest in your personal brand to make you and your business stand out then employ the World’s Most Recommended Personal Branding Firm to do it for you: If you don’t have time to create and implement your own Personal Branding strategy to find new clients or a new job we would love to work for you, details on this LinkedIn SmartLink: https://lnkd.in/d86pQUHJ

4

𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐝, 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐅𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 Recently, a Singapore court delivered a strong rebuke to Income Insurance (formerly NTUC Income) for what it described as “stonewalling” and “unreasonable” tactics in a traffic death case. The court awarded over S$417,000 in damages to the family, highlighting how the insurer’s stance prolonged hardship and delayed closure. This judgment raises an important question: 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒚? Fraudulent insurance claims are a very real problem. They drive up premiums for everyone, erode trust in the system, and drain resources that should be protecting honest policyholders. Insurers absolutely have a duty to be vigilant here. The clampdown should be firm and uncompromising. But when insurers adopt aggressive tactics against families with legitimate claims, the damage goes far beyond the courtroom: • It erodes public trust in the insurer and the wider industry. • It magnifies emotional and financial stress for grieving families. • It sends the wrong message. That the insurer’s priority is to minimize payouts, not to stand by policyholders in their moment of need. Insurance is built on a promise: when misfortune strikes, you will be supported. Every time an insurer fights harder against policyholders than against fraudsters, that promise weakens. The path forward is clear: 1. Invest in fraud detection: advanced analytics, cross-industry data sharing, and rigorous investigations. 2. Streamline legitimate claims: act with empathy, efficiency, and fairness. 3. Balance prudence with purpose: safeguarding reserves while remembering the human lives behind every claim. At the end of the day, the credibility of our industry depends not on how much we save, but on how faithfully we keep our promises.

8

5 Kommentare

Over the past couple of weeks, I had the chance to meet with several regional leaders in the insurance industry across Singapore and Malaysia to exchange views on a topic that’s been getting more attention lately: Used device protection. With smartphones lasting longer and the secondary device market growing quickly, it feels natural that protection solutions for used devices should follow. Yet in many markets, these solutions are still quite limited. What I found most interesting from the conversations was how open everyone was to exploring the challenge from different angles — underwriting, claims experience, customer adoption, and distribution. A few themes kept coming up again and again: • The importance of device diagnostics to verify device condition before coverage begins • The need for clear device identity and baseline records at enrollment • Claim disputes that often arise when there is no objective reference point • Low adoption rates when protection is only offered at a single point of sale What became clear to me is that this isn’t something any single company can solve alone. Progress will likely come from collaboration across the ecosystem — insurers, technology providers, distribution partners, and insurtech platforms all contributing their perspectives and experience. I’m really encouraged by how many industry leaders are willing to openly share ideas and challenge existing models. It feels like we’re still early in this journey, but the conversations happening across the industry are a good sign that the next generation of device protection is starting to take shape. More reflections to come as these discussions continue. #Insurtech #DeviceProtection #InsuranceInnovation #EmbeddedInsurance #DigitalProtection

12

‼️ “Before you sign ANY insurance plan, do read this.” ‼️ Yesterday, my RM pitched me a ULIP (Unit Linked Insurance Plan) that sounded irresistible on paper: 👉 Pay ₹1,31,000/year for 10 years 👉 Get ₹29,40,723 tax-free after 20 years “Approx. 9% returns, sir” Looked great… until Excel told a different story. 🙃 🔍 The Real Cashflow Years 1–10: Outflow of ₹1,31,000 per year Years 11–19: Zero cash inflow Year 20: Inflow of ₹29,40,723 Actual XIRR: 5.2% So where did their “9%” come from? They simply calculated CAGR on their fund value, pretending the premiums didn’t exist for 10 years. 👉 XIRR reflects your return, not the fund's performance That difference changes everything. 🔥 The Big Reality Check If I had taken a simple term plan and invested ₹1,31,000/year in a Nifty 50 index fund for the same 20 years… Assuming a conservative 9% CAGR: ULIP maturity (tax-free): ₹29.4 lakh Index fund value: ~₹67.5 lakh Difference: ~₹38 lakh!!! Now add one more lens: 🧮 What is ₹29.4L worth after 20 years, assuming 4% yearly inflation? ₹29.4 lakh in 2045 = roughly ₹13.3 lakh in today’s value. That’s a 55% drop in real purchasing power. 🧮 And what about the index fund after inflation? The Nifty 50 index fund growing at a conservative 9% CAGR becomes ₹67.5 lakh in 20 years. But after adjusting for 4% annual inflation ≈ ₹30.8 lakh in today’s money. So the real purchasing-power comparison looks like this: ULIP (inflation-adjusted): ~₹13.3 lakh Index fund (inflation-adjusted): ~₹30.8 lakh Even after inflation, the index fund delivers over 2.3x the real value of the ULIP. 🛑 Yes, insurance isn’t meant for returns. But if you’re locking money for 20 years, it should at least beat FD rates and inflation. This doesn’t. 🤷‍♂️ 🚩 One question that cuts through all the noise: “If I pay premiums for X years and get maturity after Y years… what’s the XIRR?” If they dodge it, you already have your answer. That alone tells you how these products are sold — highlight optics, hide actual returns. 🧠 What you SHOULD do 1. Always ask for XIRR, not CAGR 2. Check the inflation-adjusted maturity value 3. Study all charges: allocation, admin, FMC, mortality deductions etc. If you’ve been pitched something similar, drop the numbers below — I’ll calculate your real XIRR. 👇 #XIRR #CAGR #IndexInvesting #Nifty50 #IndiaInvestments #inflation #PersonalFinance #FinancialPlanning #Investing #MutualFunds #ULIP #Insurance #WealthManagement #FinancialLiteracy #MoneyMatters #InvestorAwareness - Dhruv Tandon

4

1 Kommentar