WO2025233984A1 - Celecoxib, or a combination of celecoxib with telmisartan, for use in the treatment of rett syndrome - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention concerns a composition for use in, or for the treatment of, Rett syndrome, which proposes a repositioning of an anti-inflammatory drug from the class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Description

“DRUGS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF RETT SYNDROME”

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention concerns drugs and compositions for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare genetic disorder that affects the development of the nervous system and affects predominantly female individuals. RTT represents one of the most common causes of mental retardation in females and affects 1:10,000 newborns worldwide (Chahrour and Zoghbi, 2007; Williamson and Christodoulou, 2006). In 95% of cases, RTT is caused by mutations linked to the X chromosome, in the gene encoding methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) (Amir et al. 1999; Dragich et al. 2000). Most of these consist of de novo mutations, with over 200 single nucleotide changes identified, but can also be caused by frameshifts, deletions, nonsense and missense mutations (Renieri et al. 2003; Williamson and Christodoulou 2006).

A feature common to all RTT patients is the deceleration of brain growth leading to microcephaly.

The arrest of brain growth is associated in RTT with neuronal atrophy (Belichenko et al., 1994; Kaufmann et al., 2000; Fukuda et al., 2005). Neuronal atrophy, defined as a reduced extension of the cellular processes of neurons (axons and dendrites) and their branches, accompanied by a small cell body is a salient feature of many neurological diseases. In RTT patients, brain atrophy is visible from MRI scans at the level of the cerebral cortex, particularly the motor cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus and hippocampus, and in the cerebellum (Armstrong et al., 1995, Bauman et al., 1995; Armstrong, 2002; Belichenko et al., 2008; Pohodich and Zoghbi, 2015). In addition, post-mortem histological analysis of RTT brains has revealed, in the atrophied brain regions, the presence of smaller and denser than normal neurons with a reduced dendritic complexity in the frontal lobes, hypothalamus, and hippocampus. These abnormalities are an important hallmark of RTT, and it has been hypothesized that the decrease in dendritic complexity, especially at the cortex level, is the leading cause of neural network failure (Bauman et al., 1995). In fact, the reduction of the area of the neuronal soma and dendritic arborization have been associated with intellectual disability, epilepsy, and dysfunctions of specific brain regions that cause the distinctive symptoms of RTT (Weng et al., 2011).

Demonstrating that the reactivation of the MECP2 gene in a mouse model without MeCP2 is able to recover much of the phenotype in this animal model of Rett syndrome, including cortical atrophy, has highlighted that the disease is reversible, paving the way for the search for new treatments (Guy, 2007). In particular, the reactivation of the MeCP2 gene in MeCP2-KO mice showed an almost complete reversal of the disease and an increase in survival (Guy et al., 2007).

In other studies, the overexpression of the Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) neurotrophin in MeCP2-KO mice extended their lifespan, resolving some locomotor symptoms and electrophysiological defects (Chang et al., 2006). However, even if symptoms disappear when gene expression of MeCP2 is restored in MeCP2-KO mice, gene therapy for RTT may not be accessible or appropriate for all patients affected by Rett syndrome.

There is therefore a high interest in the development of drug treatments effective for RTT.

Several tests have been done with several drug candidates that have different mechanisms of action from each other. These tests have allowed to achieve positive but not entirely satisfactory results.

The results achieved so far suggest that pharmacological treatment with effective compounds may lead to significant improvements in the RTT phenotype.

Ismail Ogunbayode Ishola et al. “Potential of telmisartan in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia” Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 31, n. 6, p. 643-651 (XP071692676) describes a combination of telmisartan and celecoxib in a study of the efficacy of telmisartan in benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Nerli Elisa et al. “In vitro modeling of dendritic atrophy in Rett syndrome: determinants for phenotypic drug screening in neurodevelopmental disorders”, Scientific Reports, vol. 10, n. 1, p. 2491 (XP093217377) discloses the use of mirtazapine for the treatment of Rett syndrome, in particular counteracting dendritic atrophy. Panayotis Nicolas et al. “State-of-the-art therapies for Rett syndrome”, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vol. 65, n. 2, p. 162-170 (XP093216620) describes other options for counteracting dendritic atrophy, and therefore for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Esposito et al. “Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Parkinson’s disease” Experimental Neurology, vol. 205, n. 2, p. 295-312 (XP022083784) studies the neuroprotective effects of NSAIDs, such as for example celecoxib, in Parkinson’s disease. However, this antecedence does not suggest the usefulness of celecoxib for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

US-B2-10,837,969 indicates telmisartan as potentially useful in diseases in which neurogenesis is impaired. Rett syndrome is also mentioned. However, this teaching does not suggest the combination of celecoxib and telmisartan for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

There is therefore the need to perfect drugs and compositions for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome that can overcome at least one of the disadvantages of the state of the art.

To do this, it is necessary to resolve the technical problem of proposing a composition for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome that has an alternative mechanism of action to known compositions.

In particular, one purpose of the present invention is to provide a composition for use for Rett syndrome that allows to act directly on neurons in order to improve the disease condition thereof, which various symptoms are associated with, including neuronal atrophy.

The Applicant has devised, tested and embodied the present invention to overcome the shortcomings of the state of the art and to obtain these and other purposes and advantages.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is set forth and characterized in the independent claims. The dependent claims describe other characteristics of the present invention or variants to the main inventive idea.

In accordance with the above purpose and to resolve the technical problem described above in a new and original way, also achieving considerable advantages compared to the state of the prior art, the present invention concerns the drug celecoxib, possibly combined with telmisartan, for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

The invention also concerns a composition for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome that comprises the drug celecoxib, and possibly telmisartan, as active ingredient.

According to one aspect of the invention, the drug celecoxib, possibly combined with telmisartan, acts directly on neurons, in particular it promotes the maturation of the neurons.

The use of celecoxib as a treatment for Rett syndrome represents a case of repositioning the drug with respect to its current intended use.

Celecoxib, whose IUPAC name is 5 -(4-methylphenyl)-3 -trifluoromethyl- 1 -(4- sulfonamylphenyl)-pyrazole, has a molecular formula C17H14F3N3O2S and is orally active. Its chemical structure is as follows:

Celecoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug of the class of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and more specifically it belongs to the subgroup of selective inhibitors of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, better known as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of prostanoids involved in inflammation and the generation of pain signals. COX-2 is an enzyme that is always present at the central nervous system’s level, in the kidney and intestine, while it is inducible in other areas of the body. Celecoxib is considered a drug with low gastrointestinal harmful effect and is therefore prescribed for patients at risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects in case of treatment with traditional NSAIDs.

Celecoxib is sold in the form of hard capsules of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg (in Italy only 100 or 200 mg).

In accordance with one embodiment, in the composition for use as above, celecoxib can have a concentration comprised between 2 pM and 20 pM, preferably between 5 pM and 15 pM, more preferably between 8 pM and 12 pM. An example of a concentration of these two drugs can be 10 pM.

According to one embodiment, the composition for use as above comprises, in addition to the drug celecoxib, the drug telmisartan. The present invention also concerns the combination of celecoxib with telmisartan for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Advantageously, when celecoxib is combined with telmisartan, their concentrations are the same, that is, the concentration ratio of the two drugs is comprised between 1:0.1 and 1:1, more advantageously it is equal to 1:1.

In one variant, the composition comprises the drugs celecoxib and telmisartan. In this variant, both drugs can have a concentration comprised between 0.2 pM and 5 pM, preferably between 0.5 pM and 2 pM, more preferably between 0.8 pM and 1.5 pM. A possible concentration of these two drugs can be, for example, 1 pM.

The use of telmisartan as a treatment in Rett syndrome also represents a case of repositioning the drug with respect to its current intended use. Furthermore, the combination of the two active ingredients (Celecoxib and telmisartan) in a single pharmaceutical product that can be administered orally is not currently available on the market.

Telmisartan is a specific active ingredient used in the treatment of hypertension belonging to the class of Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists. The IUPAC name is 2- [4- [ [4-methy l-6-( 1 -methylbenzimidazol-2-y l)-2-propy Ibenzimidazol- 1 - yl]methyl]phenyl]benzoic acid. The molecular formula is C33H30N4O2.

Telmisartan is a drug used in the treatment of hypertension belonging to the sartans class. Angiotensin II is a substance produced by the body that causes blood vessels to narrow, thereby increasing blood pressure. Telmisartan blocks the effect of angiotensin II, so that the blood vessels can relax, resulting in a decrease in blood pressure. It is used as a medicine in cardiology to treat essential hypertension and in cardiovascular prevention, since it allows to reduce cardiovascular morbidity in patients with manifest atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease (history of coronary artery disease, stroke or peripheral arterial disease) or type 2 diabetes.

Telmisartan is available as 20, 40 and 80 mg tablets.

In the context of the present invention, celecoxib applied in Rett syndrome is capable of reactivating the maturation process of the neurons that present atrophy because they are blocked at an immature stage of their development, and therefore the dendrites are of a smaller length and have a smaller number of branches and synapses compared to normal neuronal development.

When celecoxib is associated with telmisartan, the combination of the two pharmaceutical ingredients applied together is equally capable of reactivating the maturation process of the neurons that are blocked at an immature stage of their development. Similar results have also been observed with telmisartan applied alone, which is therefore also capable of reactivating the maturation process of the neurons.

Please note that when used alone, telmisartan can have a concentration comprised between 0.02 pM and 0.5 pM, preferably between 0.05 pM and 0.2 pM, more preferably between 0.08 pM and 0.15 pM. An example of a concentration of these two drugs could be 0.1 pM. It is also possible to provide a concentration of telmisartan comprised between 2 pM and 20 pM, preferably between 5 pM and 15 pM, more preferably between 8 pM and 12 pM. An example of a concentration of these two drugs could be 10 pM.

Although celecoxib (Celebrex) was developed as a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), additional pharmacological activities beyond its analgesic activity have emerged over time (Schonthal, 2007). For example, its ability to inhibit COX-2 in the nanomolar range has been surpassed by its ability to inhibit at even lower concentrations various isoforms of carbonic anhydrase (CA), a class of zinc metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible conversion of carbon dioxide into bicarbonate by regulating physiological pH. In fact, its IC50 against the tumor-associated enzymes CAIX and CAXII has been determined to be 16 and 18 nM, respectively, (Di Fiore et al, 2006), thus making it more than twice as potent as the inhibition of COX-2, whose IC50 is 40 nM (Penning et al, 1997). Furthermore, when added to cultured cells at moderate micromolar concentrations, celecoxib affects several other cellular components with roles in cell proliferation and survival (Grosch et al, 2006). Among these targets, there are at least two cellular components that can be directly modulated by celecoxib at moderate micromolar concentrations. One of these is 3 -phosphoinositide- dependent protein kinase- 1 (PDK1) and the other is sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA). In vitro, the inhibition of PDK1 and SERCA requires substantially higher concentrations of celecoxib than those required for the inhibition of COX-2 or CA. Therefore, additional non-COX-2 drug targets of this drug have to be considered when interpreting experimental results obtained with the use of celecoxib.

Through a bioinformatics analysis aimed at identifying possible new and specific mechanisms of action for celecoxib, 25,717 crystallographic structures of human proteins available in the PDB database were analyzed and the pockets of these proteins to which celecoxib can bind were identified. From this analysis, pyruvate kinase (KPYM- isoenzymes M1/M2) was identified as the protein with the highest probability of binding to celecoxib. This gene encodes a protein involved in glycolysis and several transcription and alternative splicing variants encoding some distinct isoforms have been reported. The encoded protein, in its variants, is a pyruvate kinase that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphoryl group from phosphoenolpyruvate to ADP, generating ATP and pyruvate. This protein has been shown to interact with the thyroid hormone and can mediate the cellular metabolic effects induced by thyroid hormones.

In second and third place among the proteins to which celecoxib can bind were found, respectively, the major histocompatibility complex-class I protein (MHCI) and its co-receptor beta2-microglobulin (B2MG). In particular, celecoxib was found to bind with high probability to the PDB:6PUC pocket that is formed at the contact region in the interaction between MHCI and B2MG. In the immune system, the expression of the a and [3 subunits of the T-cell receptor (TCR) on the surface of T lymphocytes is essential for antigen presentation through binding to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and B2MG on antigen-presenting cells. The discovery that MHCI, B2MG and TRBC1, a particular form of TCR0, are present in neurons represented a scientifically very important breakthrough (Shatz, 2009). Early studies have shown that in neurons, increased MHCI expression levels result in synapse elimination, while decreased MHCI leads to increased synapse density, enhances long-term potentiation (LTP), and abolishes long-term depression (LTD) (Huh et al., 2000; Glynn et al., 2011; Tetruashvily et al., 2016). In an early model, the hypothesis of the role of the immunoglobulin-like receptor B (PirB) as a key neuronal receptor for MHCI was favored, but it has also been hypothesized that TRBC1 may serve as a receptor for the MHCI/B2MG complex, at least in some neuron types (Shatz, 2009). It has also been suggested that MHCI may limit synapse density by binding to the insulin receptor, thereby inhibiting the synapsepromoting effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), which is considered a potential treatment in RTT (Dixon-Salazar et al., 2014; Arosa et al., 2021).

Therefore, an innovative aspect of the present invention is to have identified as possible new mechanisms of action of celecoxib, the regulation of the energy metabolism of glycolysis through the KPYM protein, and the control of the number of synapses and their functioning through the interaction with the MHCI/B2MG complex and possibly with one of their possible receptors TRBC1 or PirB.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of some embodiments, given as a non-restrictive example with reference to the attached drawings wherein:

- fig. 1 shows the developmental stages of hippocampal neurons in culture and the times at which cells enter each developmental stage (Dotti, Sullivan and Banker 1988);

- figs. 2A-2D show the morphological characterization of hippocampal neurons from WT and MeCP2-KO mice;

- figs. 3A-3E show the results of a primary screening of 640 drugs at DIV 6;

- figs. 4A-4B show dose-response curves, in re-screening, of celecoxib at DIV 6;

- figs. 5A-5B show dose-response curves, in re-screening, of telmisartan at DIV 6;

- figs. 6A-6D are test results showing the effect of celecoxib and telmisartan taken individually, compared to the effect of these two drugs as a pair;

- fig. 7 shows a schematized dendrite with the branches numbered in progression from the outermost to the closest to the neuron’s cell body;

- figs. 8 A and 8B are test results showing the quantification of the recovery for the five morphological parameters in MeCP2-KO neurons at DIV 12 following treatment with celecoxib;

- figs. 9 A and 9B are test results showing the quantification of the recovery for the five morphological parameters in MeCP2-KO neurons at DIV 12 following treatment with telmisartan.

We must clarify that the phraseology and terminology used in the present description, as well as the figures in the attached drawings also in relation as to how described, have the sole function of better illustrating and explaining the present invention, their purpose being to provide a non-limiting example of the invention itself, since the scope of protection is defined by the claims.

It is understood that elements and characteristics of one embodiment can be conveniently combined or incorporated into other embodiments without further clarifications.

DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS

Unless otherwise defined, all the technical and scientific terms used here and hereafter have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person with ordinary experience in the field of the art to which the present invention belongs. Even if methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described here can be used in practice and in the trials of the present invention, the methods and materials are described hereafter as an example. In the event of conflict, the present application shall prevail, including its definitions. The materials, methods and examples have a purely illustrative purpose and shall not be understood restrictively.

All measurements are carried out at 25°C (ambient temperature) and at atmospheric pressure, unless otherwise indicated. All temperatures are in degrees Celsius, unless otherwise indicated.

All percentages and ratios indicated shall be understood to refer to the weight of the total composition (w/w), unless otherwise indicated.

All percentage ranges indicated here are given with the provision that the sum with respect the overall composition is 100%, unless otherwise indicated.

All the intervals reported here shall be understood to include the extremes, including those that report an interval “between” two values, unless otherwise indicated.

The present description also includes the intervals that derive from uniting or overlapping two or more intervals described, unless otherwise indicated.

The present description also includes the intervals that can derive from the combination of two or more values taken at different points, unless otherwise indicated.

Some aspects described here concern methods and uses of celecoxib for the treatment of Rett syndrome, optionally in combination with at least one other drug which can be telmisartan for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Some embodiments described here also concern compositions comprising celecoxib and possibly telmisartan for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

The compositions described here, therefore, can be pharmaceutical compositions. The term “pharmaceutical composition” as used here is intended to comprise a composition suitable for administration to a subject, such as a mammal, especially a human. In general, a “pharmaceutical composition” is preferably sterile and free of contaminants capable of eliciting an undesired response in the subject (for example, the compound(s) in the pharmaceutical composition is/are pharmaceutical grade).

The compositions described here, therefore, can include therapeutically effective amounts of celecoxib and possibly therapeutically effective amounts of telmisartan.

The expression “therapeutically effective amount” as used here indicates the amount of a compound that, when administered to a mammal or other subject for the treatment of a disease, is sufficient to perform such treatment for the disease. The “therapeutically effective amount” will vary depending on the compound, the disease, its severity and the subject’s age, weight, etc.

In some embodiments, compositions described here can include a pharmaceutical carrier.

In one embodiment, one or more of the drugs described here can be conjugated to the at least one pharmaceutical carrier. In another embodiment, one or more of the drugs described here can be encapsulated in, or associated with, the at least one pharmaceutical or pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In a particular embodiment, the at least one pharmaceutical carrier is chosen from the group consisting of carbohydrates, lipids, peptides, proteins, nucleic acid molecules, synthetic polymers or combinations thereof.

In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical carrier is a nanotransporter. In a particular embodiment, the nanotransporter comprises one or more of either cationic lipids, cationic polymers, cationic peptides, or combinations thereof.

The expression “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” as used in the present description refers to a medium, composition or formulation that allows for an effective delivery of the therapeutic agent to the physical location most suited to the desired activity. It includes pharmaceutically acceptable materials, compositions or carriers, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, solvent or encapsulating material involved in carrying or conveying any composition in question from one organ, or part of the body, to another organ, or part of the body. Each carrier has to be “acceptable”, in the sense that it is compatible with the other ingredients of a composition in question and not harmful to the patient.

The compositions suitable for the purposes described here can be liquid, solid, semi-solid, powder.

The compositions described here can be packaged as such or mixed with acceptable excipients and conveniently formulated in any form suitable for parenteral, enteral or oral administration, including solid forms such as powders, granules, sachets, stick-packs, flow-packs, capsules, possibly normal or controlled release tablets, for example time or pH dependent, or film-coated, or gastro- protected, colon-specific or multilayer release, chewing gum or candies, or liquid forms such as syrups, drops, elixirs, solutions and suspensions in general.

In addition, the compositions described here can be incorporated into other formulations, such as suppositories, ovules, transdermal patches and suchlike, aqueous solutions for administration by intranasal spray.

For example, the compositions described here can be mixed with acceptable excipients and conveniently formulated to be employed in any form whatsoever suitable for pharmaceutical use.

Celecoxib and possibly telmisartan can be administered alone or together with a pharmaceutical carrier, selected in relation to the intended form of administration and in accordance with conventional methods. The pharmaceutical compositions can be specifically formulated for administration by any suitable route such as oral, rectal, nasal, topical (including buccal and sublingual), transdermal and parenteral (including subcutaneous, intramuscular, intrathecal, intravenous and intradermal). The therapeutic agents can be administered in liquid or solid form.

In one embodiment, one or both of the therapeutic agents (that is, celecoxib and possibly telmisartan) can be administered intravenously or intraperitoneally by infusion or injection. Solutions of the therapeutic agent or its salts can be prepared in water or saline solution, possibly mixed with a non-toxic surfactant. Dispersions can be prepared in glycerol, liquid polyethylene glycols, triacetin and mixtures thereof, and in oils. Under normal conditions of storage and use, these preparations contain a preservative to prevent the growth of microorganisms. Pharmaceutical dosage forms suitable for injection or infusion can include sterile aqueous solutions or dispersions, or sterile powders, comprising the active ingredient, which are suitable for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable or infusible solutions or dispersions, optionally encapsulated in liposomes. The final dosage form is optionally sterile, fluid and stable under the conditions of production and storage. The carrier or liquid carrier can be a solvent or liquid dispersion medium comprising, for example, water, ethanol, a polyol (for example glycerol, propylene glycol, liquid polyethylene glycols and suchlike), vegetable oils, non-toxic glyceryl esters and suitable mixtures thereof.

In one embodiment, one or both of the therapeutic agents can be combined with one or more excipients and used in the form of ingestible tablets, orosoluble tablets, troches, capsules, elixirs, suspensions, syrups, wafers and suchlike. These compositions and preparations can contain at least 0.1% (w/w) of at least one therapeutic agent. The percentage of the compositions and preparations may of course be varied, for example from about 0.1% to almost 100% of the weight of a given unit dosage form. The amount of the at least one therapeutic agent is such that an effective dose level will be achieved at the time of administration.

The tablets, lozenges, pills, capsules and suchlike can also contain one or more of the following: binders, such as microcrystalline cellulose, gum tragacanth, acacia, corn starch or gelatin; excipients, such as dicalcium phosphate, starch or lactose; a disintegrating agent, such as com starch, potato starch, alginic acid, primojel and suchlike; a lubricant, such as magnesium stearate; a glidant, such as colloidal silicon dioxide; a sweetening agent, such as sucrose, fructose, lactose, saccharin or aspartame; a flavoring agent, such as peppermint, methylsalicylate, Wintergreen oil or cherry flavoring; a peptide antibacterial agent; and an excipient, such as croscarmellose sodium, povidone, hypromellose, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium starch glycolate, poloxamer, meglumine, titanium dioxide, gelatin. When the unit dosage form is a capsule, it can contain, in addition to the above-mentioned materials, a liquid carrier, such as a vegetable oil or polyethylene glycol.

Various other materials can be present as coatings, or to otherwise modify the physical shape of the solid unit dosage form. In one embodiment, one or more of the therapeutic agents are prepared with carriers that will protect the compound from rapid elimination from the body, such as a controlled release formulation, including implants and microencapsulated delivery systems. Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers, such as modified conjugated cellulose, ethylene vinyl acetate, polyanhydrides, polyglycolic acid, collagen, polyorthoesters and polyacetic acid can be used. In one embodiment, celecoxib and possibly telmisartan are co-administered at a systemic level. In one particular embodiment, celecoxib and possibly telmisartan is administered orally, while in another particular embodiment it is administered by means of intravenous or intraperitoneal administration.

Administration can be done by means of any conventional method or route for the administration of therapeutic agents, including systemic or localized routes. In general, contemplated routes of administration include, but are not necessarily limited to, intranasal, intrapulmonary, intramuscular, intratracheal, subcutaneous, intradermal, topical, intravenous, rectal, nasal and other parenteral routes of administration. Routes of administration can be combined, if desired, or adjusted according to the agent and/or effect desired.

A person of skill in the art will easily appreciate that dose levels may vary depending on the specific agent, severity of symptoms, and the subject’s susceptibility to any side effects.

Although the dosage used will vary depending on the clinical goal to be achieved, in one embodiment, celecoxib and possibly telmisartan is administered in a fixed dose. Depending on the dosage, it may be possible or convenient to administer the daily dose in multiple dosage units.

In one embodiment, administration occurs once a day. In another embodiment, administration occurs twice a day. In yet another embodiment, administration occurs three, four, five, or six times per day. In one embodiment, administration occurs once every other day. In another embodiment, administration occurs once a week, a month or year. In another embodiment, administration occurs two, three, or four times or more per week, per month, or per year. The recommended dose for celecoxib is 200 mg daily, which can be increased to a maximum of 400 mg. For telmisartan, the recommended dose is 40 mg, preferably once a day, but this dose can be increased to a maximum of 80 mg daily.

Administration time may vary. In one embodiment, administration occurs in the morning, mid-morning, noon, afternoon, evening or midnight.

EXPERIMENTAL DATA

Given the importance of neuronal atrophy as a causative event of a series of abnormalities in the functioning of the nervous system and the potential for recovery of the symptoms of Rett syndrome, an in vitro phenotypic screening of drugs was undertaken using the “neuronal atrophy” phenotype found in cultured MeCP2-KO mouse neurons, used due to being an internationally validated in vitro model of Rett syndrome (Guy et al., 2001; Katz et al., 2012).

As a first point to be able to carry out the drug screening on MeCP2-KO mouse neurons, the known fact that neurons extracted from the rat hippocampus and cultured under appropriate conditions reach mature neuronal morphology over several days in vitro (DIV) was considered. In 1988, Dotti and collaborators identified five main stages of this in vitro development process and defined the day (DIV) when the neurons enter each stage. However, in order to conduct an in vitro pharmacological screening on MeCP2-KO mouse neurons, it was necessary to collect data on the in vitro development of mouse neurons. The comparative analysis of the in vitro developmental stages of rat and mouse hippocampal neurons allowed to review the stages defined in 1988 by Dotti and colleagues (fig. 1). Based on the updated data, stage 3 previously described by Dotti et al. as restricted to DIV 2 was extended from DIV 1.5 to DIV 3. Stage 4 was repositioned as included between DIV 4 and DIV 6, and it was also found that at this stage the primary dendrites were stabilized, and synaptogenesis was already beginning. In addition, stage 5 was redefined from DIV 7 to DIV 9, as the stage during which the dendritic branches become unstable presenting rapid phases of expansion and regression that culminate in the specification of the apical dendrite and in the maturation of the dendritic spines. In addition, at this stage the synaptogenesis is almost complete. Finally, a new stage 6 was added, comprising DIV 10-15, in which the apical dendrite becomes mature and a general outgrowth of the dendrites and an increase in the density of the dendritic spines is observed (fig. 1).

The in vitro model of mouse hippocampal neuron development described above was then used to identify the exact stage at which the structural failure of neurons occurs in Rett syndrome. For this purpose, hippocampal neurons cultured from MeCP2-KO mice were used to evaluate their total dendritic length, the number of primary and secondary dendrites and the branch points at DIV 6, 9 and 12, which were defined to be the critical points in the transition of the development to mature neurons. While in controls with normal genotype (WT) the total dendritic length progressively increases at DIV 6, 9 and 12, quantitative analysis revealed in MeCP2-KO neurons a lower degree of dendritic extension already at DIV 6 (total mean length at DIV 6: WT: I206±73.8 pm; KO: 742.7±73 pm) and this length does not increase over time (fig. 2 A, taken from Baj et al., 2014). In addition, the MeCP2-KO neurons have a lower number of primary dendrites at DIV 6 than WT neurons, to then recover in the following phases reaching a mean of 4 primary dendrites as in WT neurons (fig. 2B). Finally, with regard to the growth of new dendritic branches, a mean number of branch points and secondary dendrites was found, the same for WT and MeCP2-KO neurons at DIV 6. However, in the subsequent phases of neuronal development (DIV 9 and DIV 12), while the WT neurons grow considerably, in the MeCP2-KO neurons the number of branch points and the number of secondary dendrites remains comparable to that observed at DIV 6 (fig. 2C and 2D).

In a third phase, miniaturized cultures of MeCP2-KO mouse hippocampal neurons that retain the same characteristics as neuron cultures used in previous studies were developed, and three morphological biomarkers were identified, useful for significantly detecting dendrite atrophy compared to genetically normal (WT) neurons (Nerli et al., 2020). Specifically, while the initial study (Baj et al., 2014) was conducted on cultures in 24- well plates, in this phase the culture conditions of the primary hippocampal neurons were optimized to obtain a miniaturized, reproducible and robust cellular assay in 96-well plates (Nerli et al., 2020). After analyzing the impact of the different culture conditions on the in vitro morphological and functional maturation of primary cultures of hippocampal neurons of WT mice, a culture protocol in 96-well plates at cell densities ranging from 320 to 160 cells/mm² was established. This protocol has been shown to preserve normal development and a functional neuronal network, and it allows to carry out a phenotypic screening of drugs for RTT dendritic atrophy. Methodologically, neurons fixed and labeled for immunofluorescence with antibodies against the protein Microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2), a biomarker for dendritic processes, and the protein NeuN, a biomarker for the neuronal cell body, were observed under a fluorescence microscope and using high-content imaging techniques with the software NeuriteQuant. Three morphological parameters were measured: 1) the area of the neuronal cell body (soma), 2) the total dendritic length (TDL), 3) the number of dendritic endpoints (EP). As a pilot test to demonstrate the efficacy of this cellular assay in identifying compounds capable of counteracting dendritic atrophy, the miniaturized cultures of MeCP2-KO mouse neurons were incubated for 3 days, from DIV 9 to DIV 12, with the Brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF) neurotrophin and the antidepressant mirtazapine, and the effects were analyzed with NeuriteQuant at DIV 12. The results published in Nerli et al., 2020 demonstrate that this cellular assay is suitable for the identification of treatments that counteract neuronal atrophy.

In a fourth phase, the phenotypic screening assay developed in Nerli et al. 2020, was adapted into a configuration wherein the miniaturized cultures were treated with the drugs for 3 days using more immature cultures than those used by Nerli et al., 2020, that is, using a time window from DIV 3 to DIV 6 for the treatment.

In a fifth phase, the primary screening of the ENZO Screen Well VI library containing 640 FDA-approved drugs was conducted, using the assay modified by Nerli et al., 2020 adapted to the cultures of immature hippocampal neurons. From the primary screening of the 640 compounds of the ENZO Screen Well VI library, conducted at a concentration of 10 yM on neurons treated from DIV 3 to DIV 6, 58 compounds were identified (“positive feedback”) capable of promoting an increase in total dendritic length (TDL) and/or dendritic endpoints (EP) (light grey; fig. 3B), and 40 drugs (“negative feedback”) were identified that worsen these two parameters (dark grey; fig. 3B), with respect to the same cultures treated with the carrier substance consisting of Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 0.1% in water. In addition, it was observed that 463 drugs (“inactive”) had neither a positive nor negative effect on the TDL and/or EP, and that 79 drugs (“toxic) had a toxic effect on the TDL and or EPs.

Fig. 3C shows a graphic representation of the screening, starting from 640 drugs up to the confirmation of 14 drugs at DIV 6 and 9 drugs at DIV 9. From the graph of fig. 3D, it can be inferred that 42 drugs (light grey dots) had a positive effect on the TDL, 36 drugs (dark grey dots) had a negative effect on the TDL. From the graph of fig. 3E, it can be inferred that 52 drugs (light grey dots) had a positive effect on EP, 37 drugs (dark grey dots) had a negative effect on EP. The results were obtained on n=l independent experiment (one cell culture). The Kruskall- Wallis test was performed to compare non-parametric data between more than two groups: *p <0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

In a sixth phase, the 58 positive compounds were re-tested through incubation for 3 days from DIV 3 to DIV 6, at concentrations of 0.1 pM, 1 pM and 10 pM. 14 drugs were confirmed following this re-screening. The drug celecoxib (D5) figures among these 14 drugs capable of counteracting neuronal atrophy in MeCP2-KO mouse neurons, celecoxib (D5) being found to be effective in making the total dendritic length (TDL) and the number of dendritic endpoints (Eps) per neuron increase at a concentration of 10 pM (fig. 4A). The visualized results were obtained through 4 independent experiments (4 different cell cultures). The Kruskall- Wallis test was performed in order to compare non-parametric data between more than two groups: *p <0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Furthermore, the drug telmisartan (DI 1) also figures among the 14 best drugs, which was found to be effective in increasing both the total dendritic length (TDL) and also the number of dendritic endpoints (EPs) at concentrations of 0.1 and 10 pM, but not at 1 pM (fig. 5A). The results were obtained through 4 independent experiments (4 different cell cultures). The Kruskall-Wallis test was performed in order to compare non-parametric data between more than two groups: *p <0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

In a seventh phase, the MeCP2-K0 neurons were treated from DIV 3 to DIV 6 with the 14 drugs + mirtazapine administered in pairs, obtaining 105 pairs that were tested at three different concentrations (10 pM, 1 pM and 0.1 pM), for a total of 315 combinations. To quantify the effects of the interactions, the same morphological parameters used to test the individual drugs at DIV 6 were measured, namely total dendritic length (TDL) and the number of terminal branches (EP = Endpoints).

Of these 315 combinations, some pairs were more promising, since they produced positive effects at a concentration lower than that used for treatment with the single drugs, which is important because lower drug concentrations are better tolerated by patients since they have fewer side effects.

The combination of the drugs D5 and Dl l, corresponding to celecoxib in association with telmisartan, at a concentration of 1 pM for both drugs, was found to be able to counteract neuronal atrophy in MeCP2-KO mouse neurons, a model of Rett syndrome. This concentration is lower than the minimum effective concentration in the in vitro assays carried out with celecoxib only, which had been 10 pM, thus indicating an enhancement of the effect found with the pair of drugs, compared to the drug celecoxib used individually. (Table 1, fig. 6).

Table 1. Combination that has produced a positive effect on both the TDL and EP. The drug celecoxib (D5) in combination with the drug telmisartan (Dl l) at IpM is highlighted in grey.

It can be inferred from fig. 6 that celecoxib administered individually at 0.1 pM had no positive effect on the total dendritic length TDL and on the dendritic endpoints, while telmisartan administered individually at the same concentration had a positive effect on both these two parameters (fig. 6A and 6C). The combination of celecoxib and telmisartan at 0.1 pM did have a positive effect on total dendritic length (fig. 6B) and dendritic endpoints (fig. 6D).

In an eighth phase, the drugs celecoxib and telmisartan were tested individually to verify their efficacy in counteracting neuronal atrophy in more mature neurons. In this series of experiments, MeCP2-KO mouse hippocampal neurons were incubated with the drug for 3 days from DIV 9 to DIV 12. To visualize the dendrites and cell soma, the neurons were transfected with a plasmid encoding the Green-Fluorescent protein (GFP) that is expressed throughout the cytoplasm of neurons. Subsequently, the neurons were fixed, and their images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope to then be manually traced with the software NeuronJ (NIH-ImageJ), and then subjected to Sholl and Strahler analysis and measurement of the lengths of all dendritic processes. There were 5 measurements carried out:

1) total dendritic length (TDL), which gives an indication of the overall growth of the neurons;

2) Sholl analysis, which provides an estimate of the branches of the dendrites, both as a total number (TC = Total Crossings) and also as the number of branches at progressive distances from the neuron’s cell body;

3) Strahler analysis, which counts the number of the different orders of boxes of the dendrites. Strahler order 1 (SOI) boxes are the outermost and most peripheral (= the tips of the dendritic tree), while order 5 (SO5) boxes are the innermost and closest to the cell body (= the trunks at the base of the dendritic tree) (fig- 7);

4) maximal dendritic length (MDL), which gives information on the extension of the dendritic tree;

5) polarization index (PI Lm/Lsym), which is a measure closely related to the previous one (MDL) and indicates how close a neuron is to the elongated shape, compared to the symmetrical shape.

In order to achieve a complete recovery of the deficits, not only do Rett neurons have to reach a dendritic length comparable to healthy neurons, but they also have to have a harmonic breakdown between main and secondary boxes, with a number of overall branches as close as possible to normal neurons, and an overall shape of the dendritic tree adequate for the neuron’s function.

These experiments showed that the treatment of MeCP2-KO neurons, model of Rett syndrome, with 10pM celecoxib (D5) yielded good results (fig. 8).

In fig. 8A, the graph shows a comparison of the effect of celecoxib (in light grey) compared to the effect of the carrier DMSO 0.1% (in black) on MeCP2-KO neurons. There is an increase in in all the morphological parameters MDL, TDL, Lm/Lsym TC and SOI with celecoxib compared to the treatment with DMSO. Fig. 8B shows in black, in the center of each radial diagram (dashed line), the values of the 5 morphological parameters for the MeCP2-KO neurons treated with the carrier (between 0 and 0.5). Externally, in black (continuous line), the values for the normal neurons (WT) are shown. The corresponding values after treatment with celecoxib are indicated in grey. A complete recovery of the values for all 5 morphological parameters can be observed, namely: maximal dendritic length (MDL), total dendritic length (TDL), polarization index (Lm/Lsym), total number of crossings in the Sholl analysis (Total crossings = TC) and number of dendritic endpoints (Strahler Order 1 = SOI).

Similarly, fig. 9A shows the graph comparing the effect of telmisartan (in light grey) with the effect of the carrier DMSO 0.1% (in black) on the MeCP2-KO neurons. An increase is observed in TDL, TC and SOI parameters with telmisartan compared to the KO treated with DMSO. In fig. 9B, the black dashed line in the center of each radial diagram shows the values of the 5 morphological parameters for the carrier-treated MeCP2-KO neurons (between 0 and 0.5). Externally, the continuous black line shows the values for the normal neurons (WT). The corresponding values after treatment with telmisartan are indicated in light grey. A partial recovery can be observed in the values of the following: maximum dendritic length (MDL), total dendritic length (TDL), total number of crossings in the Sholl analysis (Total crossings = TC), number of dendritic endpoints (Strahler Order 1 = SOI); while the polarization index (Lm/Lsym) almost completely recovers the normal values of the WT.

It is clear that modifications and/or additions of parts may be made to the drug and to the composition as described heretofore, without thereby departing from the field and scope of the present invention, as defined by the claims.

It is also clear that, although the present invention has been described with reference to some specific examples, a person of skill in the art will be able to achieve other equivalent forms of drugs and compositions for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome, having the characteristics as set forth in the claims and hence all coming within the field of protection defined thereby.

Claims

1. Celecoxib for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

2. Combination of celecoxib and telmisartan for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome.

3. Composition for use in the treatment of Rett syndrome, characterized in that it comprises celecoxib.

4. Composition for use as in claim 3, characterized in that celecoxib acts as a promoter of neuronal maturation.

5. Composition for use as in claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the concentration of celecoxib is between 2 pM and 20 pM.

6. Composition for use as in claim 3 or 4, characterized in that it comprises, in addition to celecoxib, telmisartan as another drug.

7. Composition for use as in claim 6, characterized in that the combination of celecoxib with telmisartan acts as a promoter of neuronal maturation.

8. Composition for use as in claim 6 or 7, characterized in that the concentration ratio of celecoxib to telmisartan is comprised between 1:0.1 and 1:1.

9. Composition for use as in claim 8, characterized in that the concentration of each of celecoxib and telmisartan is between 0.02 pM and 0.5 pM.

10. Composition for use as in claim 9, characterized in that the concentration of each of celecoxib and telmisartan is between 0.08 pM and 0.15 pM.