[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2025125304A1 - Procédé de détermination d'un élément d'information sur une qualité d'une image - Google Patents

Procédé de détermination d'un élément d'information sur une qualité d'une image Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2025125304A1
WO2025125304A1 PCT/EP2024/085633 EP2024085633W WO2025125304A1 WO 2025125304 A1 WO2025125304 A1 WO 2025125304A1 EP 2024085633 W EP2024085633 W EP 2024085633W WO 2025125304 A1 WO2025125304 A1 WO 2025125304A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
image
qpx
quality
image quality
analyte
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
PCT/EP2024/085633
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Fredrik HAILER
Bernhard Limburg
Max Berg
Volker Tuerck
Susana CONTRERAS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Roche Diabetes Care GmbH
Original Assignee
Roche Diabetes Care GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Roche Diabetes Care GmbH filed Critical Roche Diabetes Care GmbH
Publication of WO2025125304A1 publication Critical patent/WO2025125304A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/8483—Investigating reagent band
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00—Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10024—Color image
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30168—Image quality inspection

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, by using at least one mobile device having a camera; and to a method for determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid, which method makes use of the method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image.
  • the invention relates to a mobile device having a camera for carrying out the methods, to a kit comprising a mobile device having a camera, to computer programs and computer-readable storage media.
  • the methods, mobile devices, computer programs and storage media specifically may be used in medical diagnostics, for example in order to qualitatively or quantitatively detect one or more analytes in bodily fluids, such as for detecting glucose or virus load in blood or in interstitial fluid.
  • test elements comprising one or more test chemicals, which, in the presence of the analyte to be detected, are capable of performing one or more detectable detection reactions, such as optically detectable detection reactions.
  • detectable detection reactions such as optically detectable detection reactions.
  • test chemicals comprised in test elements reference may be made e.g. to J. Hoenes et al.: The Technology Behind Glucose Meters: Test Strips, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Volume 10, Supplement 1, 2008, S-10 to S-26.
  • Other test chemicals e.g. for detecting viruses, particularly by using lateral flow assays, are known to the person skilled in the art.
  • the objective quality of the image captured is an important factor.
  • Many different aspects may have an impact on the objective quality of such an image, including in particular ambient lighting conditions and camera settings during the capturing of an image. These influencing factors may negatively impact image characteristics like noise (also referred to as “image noise”), homogeneity of illumination, ill-defined intensity spots, color resolution, spatial resolution, and the like.
  • a color reference card providing for a plurality of reference colors
  • such analytical measurements are restricted to pre-calibrated or pretested mobile devices, e.g. a limited number of smartphone types or smartphone models, such that a minimum level of image quality may be ensured. If no color reference card is used, a pre-testing of specific smartphone models may ensure a minimum level of measurement performance, e.g. in terms of reliability or accuracy; but such a pre-testing cannot ensure a proper functionality for each individual measurement.
  • any influences of the afore -mentioned impact factors on image compression may result in varying image quality, and therefore in varying measurement performances.
  • some factors known to have an impact on image quality have been considered to some extent in non-diagnostic fields.
  • US11475596B2 describes a method which i.a. comprises: receiving first images in an image sequence from a camera device; determining a first portion of a target object detected in the first images; determining a confidence level for a second portion of the target object in the first images, and adjusting a configuration of the camera device; processing the image sequence, to determine the predicted location of the target object identified in the image sequence based on movement of the target object in the image sequence; and adjusting the configuration of the camera device.
  • one or more quality parameters of images may be determined, and whether or not they pass a quality test; said quality tests may evaluate whether or not images include faces of movers that result in successful facial recognition thereof, e.g. whether the images are overexposed or underexposed, or whether the mover in the images is blurry or not blurry.
  • US10803431B2 describing a method of presenting a graphical user interface on a portable device for walking a user through an image capturing process for improving a visibility level of images to identify magnetic ink character recognition code for performing a transaction of a financial document, the method i.a.
  • the image quality parameters may include brightness parameters, orientation parameters, and/or sharpness parameters; sufficient visibility level may be evaluated based on a match with a predefined threshold; further, sufficient visibility level may be evaluated based on a match with a set of thresholds, each for another of values each set according to another of the image quality parameters.
  • US10171773B2 relates to a computer system for dynamic video image management, wherein, with respect to a dynamic video image, a set of dynamic image quality factors is collected; and wherein, based on the set of dynamic image quality factors, a set of display parameter values, of a set of display parameters for a set of computing assets to benefit the set of dynamic image quality factors with respect to the dynamic video image, is determined.
  • the set of dynamic image quality factors may be evaluated with respect to a set of image quality factor benchmarks, which may include a threshold level of quality.
  • a user may be a participant in a video conference call, the user and their surroundings may appear unnatural with a high intensity of color; by considering dynamic image quality factors, which may include a white balance factor and a saturation factor, the set of display parameters may allow the facial-related features of the user to appear more natural with a lower intensity of color.
  • dynamic image quality factors which may include a white balance factor and a saturation factor
  • US2022/0317050A1 relates to a method of adjusting a setup used in an analytical method of determining a concentration of an analyte in a body fluid based on a color formation reaction in an optical test strip, the analytical method comprising using a mobile device having a camera, wherein the adjustment method comprises: a) carrying out a plurality of analyte measurement attempts with the mobile device set in a standard measuring mode, the analyte measurement attempts comprising: capturing images of an optical test strip, checking for the fulfillment of one or more measurement rejection criteria, and when one or more measurement rejection criteria are fulfilled, rejecting the measurement attempt and logging the rejection events in the memory, and b) analyzing the logged rejection events in an error analysis and, based on the result, adjusting the setup by placing the device (i) in a reduced measuring mode wherein one or more of the measurement rejection criteria are deactivated, and/or (ii) in an enhanced measurement mode wherein during a measurement attempt corrective feedback is provided to the user.
  • the devices and methods which at least partially address the above- mentioned challenges. Specifically, it is desirable to provide devices and methods which allow for a reliable evaluation of a level of quality of an image captured by a mobile device, such that accurate measurement results may be obtained by a mobile-based detection of an analyte in a bodily fluid. Moreover, the devices and methods provided should reduce a number of failed attempts to perform a mobile-based detection of an analyte in a bodily fluid, wherein the failed attempts are attributable, at least partially, to a poor level of image quality.
  • a method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image by using at least one mobile device having at least one camera, and specifically having at least one processor; further, by an analytical measurement method, specifically a computer-implemented analytical measurement method, for detecting at least one analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid by using a mobile device having at least one camera, and specifically having at least one processor; even further, by a mobile device having at least one camera, and specifically having at least one processor; by a kit comprising a mobile device and an optical test element; and by computer programs and computer-readable storage media; with the features of the independent claims.
  • Advantageous embodiments which might be realized in an isolated fashion or in any arbitrary combinations are listed in the dependent claims.
  • the terms “have”, “comprise” or “include” or any arbitrary grammatical variations thereof are used in a non-exclusive way. Thus, these terms may both refer to a situation in which, besides the feature introduced by these terms, no further features are present in the entity described in this context and to a situation in which one or more further features are present.
  • the expressions “A has B”, “A comprises B” and “A includes B” may both refer to a situation in which, besides B, no other element is present in A (i.e. a situation in which A solely and exclusively consists of B) and to a situation in which, besides B, one or more further elements are present in entity A, such as element C, elements C and D or even further elements.
  • the terms “at least one”, “one or more”, or similar expressions indicating that a feature or element may be present once or more than once typically will be used only once when introducing the respective feature or element.
  • the expressions “at least one” or “one or more” will not be repeated, non-withstanding the fact that the respective feature or element may be present once or more than once.
  • the present invention relates to a method, specifically a computer-implemented method, for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, by using a mobile device having at least one camera and, specifically, at least one processor.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image relates to a suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the at least one analyte is detected from at least one reagent test region of an optical test element.
  • the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the method comprises the following steps which, as an example, may be performed in the given order. It shall be noted, however, that a different order may also be possible. Further, it may also be possible to perform one or more of the method steps once or repeatedly. Further, it may be possible to perform two or more of the method steps simultaneously or in a timely overlapping fashion. The method may comprise further method steps which are not listed.
  • the method comprises, in a first step i), receiving, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, at least one image captured by using the camera of the mobile device.
  • the image comprises at least a part of, specifically all of, the reagent test region of the optical test element having the sample of the bodily fluid applied thereto.
  • the method further comprises, in step ii): determining, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, from the image received in step (i), independently from one another, an image quality value QVx for each of at least two different image quality parameters QPx.
  • the image quality parameters QPx are selected from a pre-determined set of image quality parameters QP1 to QPn, wherein x is a numerical value from 1 to n, and wherein n is the total number of image quality parameters contained in the pre-determined set of image quality parameters.
  • the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx independently from one another, are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, e.g. of the image received in step i), and a spatial characteristic of an image, e.g. of the image received in step i).
  • the method further comprises, in step iii): comparing, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, each of the image quality values QVx derived in step (ii), independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx).
  • Step iii) further comprises: Based on the comparing, assigning, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, independently from one another, an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) to each of the at least two different image quality parameters QPx of step (ii).
  • the individual numerical quality assessment values are selected from a pre -determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values.
  • the method further comprises, in step iv): deriving, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii), an overall image quality assessment value OAV.
  • Step iv) further comprises: Comparing, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, said overall image quality assessment value OAV to an overall pre-determined threshold value OTV.
  • Step iv) still further comprises: Based on the comparing, determining, specifically by the processor of the mobile device, the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i).
  • Step iv) of the method is performed only if none of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a predetermined category of an insufficient quality in respect of any of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • an item of information about a quality of an image is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to any piece of information which may be representative for a given level or degree of quality of an image, specifically of an electronic image, e.g. an image captured by a camera of a mobile device.
  • the “quality of an image” may refer to one or more physical parameters or attributes characteristic of the image; e.g. the “quality of an image” may refer to a set of, specifically pre-defined, parameters, wherein the parameters may be quantifiable.
  • the parameters may quantify a level or a degree of quality of an image, e.g. in terms of numerical values indicating a specific level or degree of quality of the image.
  • the physical parameters which may be employed in order to specify the “quality of an image” specifically may include, without limitation, any parameters relating to a color characteristic of an image, and/or to a spatial characteristic of an image; more specifically, the physical parameters may include one or more of the following: illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness. In this regard, other physical parameters may be contemplated as well.
  • the “item of information about the quality of the image” relates to a suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • suitable of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to an indication that an image can be properly used in an analytical measurement method which involves detection of at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the image specifically an electronic image, may be used as an input in the analytical measurement method, and may be further evaluated in order to obtain an analytical measurement result.
  • the “suitability of the image” may be represented by Boolean information, specifically by Boolean information indicating that the image, specifically a quality of the image, is either sufficient for use of the image in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid, or indicating that the image, specifically a quality of the image, is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method.
  • analytical measurement also referred to as “determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid”, as used herein, is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to a quantitatively and/or qualitatively determination of at least one analyte in an arbitrary sample or aliquot of bodily fluid.
  • the bodily fluid may comprise one or more of blood, interstitial fluid, urine, saliva or other types of body fluids, particularly blood.
  • the result of the analytical measurement, or of the determining of the concentration may be a concentration of the analyte and/or the presence or absence of the analyte to be determined.
  • the analytical measurement may be a blood glucose measurement, thus the result of the analytical measurement may for example be a blood glucose concentration.
  • an analytical measurement result value may be determined by the analytical measurement.
  • analyte concentration value often also referred to as “analytical measurement result value”, as used herein, is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to a numerical indication of an analyte concentration in a sample.
  • the at least one analyte may be or may comprise one or more specific chemical compounds and/or other parameters.
  • one or more analytes may be determined which take part in metabolism, such as blood glucose.
  • other types of analytes or parameters may be determined, e.g. a pH value, a virus, such as influence virus type A or type B, SARS-CoV-2, etc.
  • the invention specifically may be described with respect to blood glucose measurements. It shall be noted, however, that the present invention may also be used for other types of analytical measurements using test elements, in particular for analytes other than blood glucose, specifically analytes to be detected by using a lateral flow assay, such as various types of viruses.
  • the analyte is detected from a reagent test region of an optical test element.
  • the reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the reagent test region is adapted for application of a sample of the bodily fluid, and the reagent test region is adapted to undergo, at least partially, an optical detection reaction, when the sample of the bodily fluid is applied to the reagent test region.
  • the reagent test region may also be referred to as a “test field” herein.
  • the optical detection reaction may specifically comprise “a color formation reaction”, specifically involving a color-change.
  • a color-change involved in an optical detection reaction may result in a change of a color of a reagent test region, e.g. from yellow to green, from white to grey or black, or from white to red or purple.
  • the optical detection reaction may specifically comprise a development of a color which has not been present before the optical detection reaction was performed; this type of optical detection reaction typically is observed with lateral flow assays. In such lateral flow assays, usually one or more bands, or lines, can be observed in the reagent test region after sample application, and usually after a pre-determined period of waiting time, in case of a positive test result.
  • the terms “optical detection reaction” and “color formation reaction” specifically may refer, without limitation, to a chemical, biological or physical reaction during which a color, specifically a reflectance, of at least one element involved in the reaction, changes with the progress of the reaction.
  • optical test element is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to an arbitrary element or device configured for performing an optical detection reaction, specifically involving a color change .
  • the optical test element may also be referred to as test strip or test element, wherein all three terms may refer to the same element.
  • the optical test element has a reagent test region containing at least one test chemical for detecting at least one analyte.
  • the optical test element may comprise at least one substrate, such as at least one carrier, with the at least one reagent test region applied thereto or integrated therein.
  • the term “reagent test region” (also referred to as a “test field” herein) is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to a coherent amount of the test chemical, such as to a field or a membrane, e.g. a field or a membrane of round, polygonal or rectangular shape, having one or more layers of material, with at least one layer of the test field having the test chemical comprised therein.
  • test chemicals comprised in optical test strips as an example reference is made to J. Hoenes et al.: The Technology Behind Glucose Meters: Test Strips, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Volume 10, Supplement 1, 2008, S-10 to S-26. Other types of test chemistry are possible and may be used for performing the present invention.
  • the processor may comprise at least one arithmetic logic unit (ALU), at least one floating-point unit (FPU), such as a math coprocessor or a numeric co-processor, a plurality of registers, specifically registers configured for supplying operands to the ALU and storing results of operations, and a memory, such as an LI and L2 cache memory.
  • ALU arithmetic logic unit
  • FPU floating-point unit
  • the processor may be a multi-core processor.
  • the processor may be or may comprise a central processing unit (CPU).
  • the processor may be or may comprise a microprocessor, thus specifically the processor’s elements may be contained in one single integrated circuitry (IC) chip.
  • the processor may be or may comprise one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and/or one or more field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and/or one or more tensor processing unit (TPU) and/or one or more chip, such as a dedicated machine learning optimized chip, or the like.
  • ASICs application-specific integrated circuits
  • FPGAs field-programmable gate arrays
  • TPU tensor processing unit
  • the processor specifically may be configured, such as by software programming, for performing one or more operations of determination of an image quality and/or one or more operations of detection of an analyte, as will be outlined in further detail below.
  • the camera may comprise further elements, such as one or more optical elements, e.g. one or more lenses.
  • the camera may be a fix-focus camera, having at least one lens which is fixedly adjusted with respect to the camera.
  • the camera may also comprise one or more variable lenses which may be adjusted, automatically or manually.
  • the invention specifically shall be applicable to cameras as usually used in mobile applications such as notebook computers, tablets or, specifically, cell phones such as smart phones.
  • the camera may be part of a mobile device which, besides the at least one camera, comprises one or more data processing devices such as one or more data processors. Other cameras, however, are feasible.
  • the method comprises, in step i), receiving at least one image captured by using the camera of the mobile device.
  • the image comprises at least a part of, specifically all of, the reagent test region of the optical test element having the sample of the bodily fluid applied thereto.
  • receiving at least one image as used herein is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art and is not to be limited to a special or customized meaning.
  • the term specifically may refer, without limitation, to one or more of imaging, image recording, image acquisition, image capturing.
  • the term “receiving at least one image” may comprise receiving and/or capturing a single image and/or a plurality of images such as a sequence of images.
  • the receiving and/or capturing of the image may comprise recording continuously a sequence of images such as a video or a movie.
  • the receiving and/or capturing of the at least one image may be initiated by the user action or may automatically be initiated, e.g. once the presence of the at least one object within a field of view and/or within a predetermined sector of the field of view of the camera is automatically detected.
  • These automatic image acquisition techniques are known e.g. in the field of automatic barcode readers, such as from automatic barcode reading apps.
  • the receiving and/or capturing of the images may take place, as an example, by acquiring a stream or “life stream” of images with the camera, wherein one or more of the images, automatically or by user interaction such as pushing a button, are stored and used as the at least one first image or the at least one second image, respectively.
  • the image acquisition may be supported by a processor of the mobile device, and the storing of the images may take place in a data storage device of the mobile device.
  • the receiving and/or capturing of the at least one image comprises receiving and/or capturing at least one image with having the sample of the bodily fluid applied to the test strip and, further and optionally, such as before capturing the image with the sample applied to the test strip, receiving and/or cap- taring at least one image without having the sample of the body fluid applied to the test strip.
  • the latter image specifically may be used for comparative purposes and may also be referred to as a “blank image” or “dry image”.
  • the sample application generally may take place, as an example, directly or indirectly, e.g. via at least one capillary element.
  • the at least one image received and/or captured after sample application may typically also be referred to as the “wet image”, even though the sample may have dried when the image is actually captured.
  • the wet image typically may be received and/or taken after having waited for at least a predetermined waiting time, such as after five seconds or more, in order to allow for the detection reaction to take place.
  • the method may comprise, between receiving and/or taking the at least one optional dry image and the at least one wet image, waiting for at least a predetermined minimum amount of time.
  • This predetermined minimum amount of time specifically may be sufficient for a detection reaction to take place in the test strip.
  • the minimum amount of waiting time may be at least 5 s, or up to 15 min in the case of SARS- CoV-2 rapid antigen LFA (lateral flow assay) self-tests for use by a patient.
  • the analytical measurement method for detecting an analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid may comprise detecting the presence or absence of the analyte. Additionally or alternatively, the analytical measurement method may comprise determining the analyte concentration, particularly an analyte concentration value, from color formation of the reagent test region.
  • the analytical measurement method may include a change of at least one optical property of an optical test element, such as an optical test strip or a lateral flow assay, which change may be measured or determined visually by using the camera.
  • the analytical measurement may be or may comprise a color formation reaction in the presence of the at least one analyte to be determined.
  • the term “color formation reaction” as used herein has been defined herein above.
  • the color formation may be detected by the mobile device, such as by a processor of the mobile device, and may be evaluated qualitatively, and specifically quantitatively, such as by deriving, from the at least one image, at least one parameter quantifying or characterizing the color formation of the test field due to the presence of the analyte in the bodily fluid.
  • the mobile device and specifically the processor of the mobile device may be configured for determining a color change by determining a change of one or more color coordinates taking place due to the detection reaction.
  • the presence or absence of the analyte, or the concentration of the analyte, particularly the analyte concentration value, is determined from a color formation of the test field.
  • the at least one image is used.
  • the analyte concentration value may be a numerical value indicator of a result of the analytical measurement, such as indicative of the concentration of at least one analyte in the sample, such as a blood glucose concentration or virus load.
  • the method may further comprise a step of displaying the item of information about a quality of an image, such as on a display of the mobile device. Additionally or alternatively, the method may comprise storing the item of information about a quality of an image in at least one data storage device of the mobile device. Again additionally and alternatively, the method may further comprise transmitting the item of information about a quality of an image via at least one interface and/or via at least one data transmission network, such as to another computer, e.g. for further evaluation or processing.
  • the present invention particularly relates to method, specifically a computer-implemented method, for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, wherein the item of information about the quality of the image relates to a suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid, wherein the at least one analyte is detected from at least one reagent test region of an optical test element, and wherein the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte; by using a mobile device having at least one camera, the method comprising:
  • step (ii) determining, from the image received in step (i), independently from one another, an image quality value QVx for each of at least two different image quality parameters QPx, selected from a pre -determined set of image quality parameters QP1 to QPn, wherein x is a numerical value from 1 to n, and wherein n is the total number of image quality parameters contained in the predetermined set of image quality parameters, wherein at least two, specifically the at least two, of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, and a spatial characteristic of an image;
  • step (iii) comparing each of the image quality values QVx determined in step (ii), independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx); and, based on the comparing, assigning, independently from one another, an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) to each of the at least two different image quality parameters QPx of step (ii), wherein the individual numerical quality assessment values are selected from a pre -determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values;
  • step (iv) deriving, from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii), an overall image quality assessment value OAV; comparing said overall image quality assessment value OAV to at least one overall pre -determined threshold value OTV; and, based on the comparing, determining the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i), wherein step iv) is performed only if none of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a predetermined category of an insufficient quality in respect of any of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • the method proposed provides for a reliable evaluation of a level of quality of an image captured by a mobile device, which is an important aspect in mobile-based analytical measurements, wherein an analyte is to be accurately detected in a bodily fluid by using a mobile consumer device, like a smartphone, a tablet computer, or a laptop computer.
  • the method takes into account a selected set of image quality attributes (such as image quality parameters QPx) which can be quantified using simple algorithms.
  • an “optimal” i.e. a high-quality
  • an overall level of image quality (such as an overall image quality assessment value) can be derived (particularly by calculation), thereby enhancing an overall performance of a subsequent analytical measurement.
  • the selected set of parameters or quality attributes used in the method of the present invention differs from other methods in that, most often, quantifying an image quality aims at optimizing how pleasant an image appears to human perception, e.g. when photos are taken in everyday-life situations, e.g. during vacation, at celebrations or events, and the like.
  • the goal is to achieve an accurate and reliable measurement performance of an algorithm implemented for detection of an analyte.
  • the set of physical parameters or quality attributes which are used to determine image quality is selected based on a measurement performance of such an algorithm for detecting an analyte, specifically wherein said algorithm takes into account an extensive set of data, particularly image data, wherein a wide range of image aberrations may be present in the set of data (i.e. deviations from a “high-quality” image, wherein “high- quality” relates to an objectively high, and quantifiable, quality of an image, such as having a high signal -to-noise ratio).
  • the measurement performance of an algorithm for detecting the analyte will particularly depend on an accurate and reliable determination of the color formed during the color formation reaction.
  • the set of parameters or quality attributes to be used in the method of the present invention is specifically selected such that an accurate and reliable determination of the color formed during the color formation reaction is enabled, or supported. More specifically, since said parameters or quality attributes (i.e.
  • the image quality parameters QPx) are quantifiable, their evaluation, by assigning an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) to each of QPx, may allow to perform the analytical measurement method of the present invention with sufficient accuracy and reliability, even if one or more of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) may indicate a poor, or even insufficient, level of, or category of, a quality of the image received in step i), with respect to one or more of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • the devices and methods provided contribute to reducing a number of failed attempts to perform a mobile-based detection of an analyte in a bodily fluid, wherein the failed attempts are attributable, at least partially, to a poor level of image quality.
  • This additional advantage is achieved by appropriately balancing an impact of each of the selected parameters or quality attributes when an overall image quality assessment value is derived in order to assess an overall quality of an image for the purpose intended, namely to make use of the image in a (subsequent) analytical detection of an analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image captured in step (i) may comprise Boolean information, such as “sufficient” or “not sufficient”; more specifically, Boolean information indicating that the quality of the image is either sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid, or that the quality of the image is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method.
  • the image quality parameters QPx are selected from a pre-determined set of image quality parameters QP1 to QPn, which may relate to any physical parameter suitable to characterize, specifically quantify, a quality aspect of the image received in step i).
  • the at least two, specifically all, of the image quality parameters QPx are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, specifically of the image received in step i), and a spatial characteristic of an image, specifically of the image received in step i). More specifically, the at least two, even more spe- cifically all, of the image quality parameters QPx may, independently from one another, be configured to assess at least one of: illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • the pre-determined set of image quality parameters QP1 to QPn comprises, specifically consists of, illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • an image quality value QVx is determined for each of at least two different image quality parameters QPx.
  • the image quality parameters QPx are physical parameters, which relate to quality aspects of an image, and which are quantifiable, in particular by image quality values QVx.
  • the image quality values QVx may be, or may be represented by, numerical values corresponding to each of a respective one of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • an image quality parameter QPx relates to a color characteristic of an image, such as an illumination inhomogeneity parameter, then said image quality parameter QPx can be quantified, e.g.
  • a range of the brightness profile may be derived by determining a difference of a minimum of the brightness profile and a maximum of the brightness profile, i.e. max(brightness profile) - min(brightness profile).
  • the brightness profile should be smoothed to some extent, so as to avoid any undesired impact of noise, or of outliers.
  • a wide range of the brightness profile is reflected by a corresponding image quality value QVx, which may be a comparatively high numerical value, particularly higher than, e.g., an image quality value QVx which represents a rather narrow range of a brightness profile of an image, or of a part of an image.
  • the image quality values QVx may be, or may be represented by, different numerical values, in each case corresponding to a respective one of the other image quality parameters QPx, such as when an image quality parameter QPx is selected from one or more of maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • a maximum illumination of an image can be used to identify dark or saturated images, or dark or saturated sub-regions within an image.
  • the information contained in the two-dimensional Fourier transform may be averaged radially (particularly with the center located at 0,0 frequency). Such a radial averaging reduces the dimensionality, and facilitates interpretation of the spectral characteristics of an image.
  • Lossy compression of images i.e. compression of images wherein a relevant part of information contained in a non-compressed image is lost during a compression process, generally alters the power spectral density of an image. Said alteration can be deduced from the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform.
  • any of the image quality parameters QPx contemplated herein, specifically illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness, and the determination of such parameters, particularly a quantification of such parameters, e.g. by determination of numerical values for the image quality values QVx, are generally known in the art.
  • an illumination or an intensity, respectively is measured in counts, e.g. 0 to 255 for each color channel. If 16bit-images are used, 0 to 65535 counts may be obtained per color channel.
  • a standard deviation or a variance of the counts within a homogeneous region of interest (ROI), e.g. a white ROI, specifically a white ROI having no particular feature (such as a geometrical element like a line) may be used as a unit, e.g. measured in counts, or counts 2 , respectively.
  • ROI homogeneous region of interest
  • each of the image quality values QVx determined in step (ii) is compared, independently from one another, to one or more predetermined threshold values TV(QPx).
  • the pre -determined threshold values TV(QPx) are numerical values.
  • threshold value TV(QPx) there is only one threshold value TV(QPx)
  • said threshold value TV(QPx) will separate the full range of (numerical) image quality values QVx, which theoretically may be obtained for the specific image quality parameter QPx, into two sub-ranges of numerical values, one of which is a sub-range of numerical values below the one threshold value TV(QPx), and the other sub-range of numerical values being above the one threshold value TV(QPx), wherein the (numerical) one threshold value TV(QPx) will be a part of only one of said two subranges.
  • at least three sub-ranges of (numerical) image quality values QVx will be present.
  • the pre -determined threshold values TV(QPx) may be selected for each of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, such that the resulting sub-ranges of image quality values QVx may be categorized in terms of different levels of a (objective) quality of an image.
  • a first sub-range of image quality values QVx may be representative of a category of an insufficient quality in respect of a corresponding image quality parameter QPx
  • a second subrange of image quality values QVx may be representative of a category of an acceptable quality in respect of said image quality parameter QPx. More than two sub-ranges of image quality values QVx allow for differentiating between several acceptable levels of quality of an image.
  • a second and a third sub-range of image quality values QVx may be representative of a category of an acceptable quality and of a high quality, respectively, in respect of said image quality parameter QPx.
  • each of the image quality values QVx determined in step (ii) is compared, independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx)
  • a number of threshold values TV(QPx) selected for a given image quality parameter QPx may differ from a number of threshold values TV(QPx) selected for another image quality parameter QPx.
  • two threshold values TV(QPx) may be selected.
  • the pre -determined threshold values TV(QPx) may be selected, or determined, or defined, as may be appropriate for a particular image quality parameter QPx.
  • the pre -determined threshold values TV(QPx) may be selected, determined, or defined, for each of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, by taking into account one or more of the following: Experimental data, study data, data from laboratory work examples, physical considerations, signal processing considerations, algorithmic considerations, and any combinations thereof.
  • Such physical con- sideration may comprise, e.g. whether or not any, or a significant number of, pixels are saturated, or are zero; and whether or not any smoothing applied to an image is too extensive, and/or sharpness is too low, for obtaining a physically meaningful result.
  • signal processing considerations may comprise, e.g. whether or not a specific illumination inhomogeneity present in an image can be corrected by signal processing; and whether or not a specific amount of image noise present in an image may be accounted for by signal processing?
  • algorithmic considerations may comprise, e.g. whether or not a specific image quality value QVx may prevent the algorithm from detecting a geometrical element, such as a line, in an image; and whether or not a specific QVx may induce a flawed, or a false, detection, e.g. of a specific color, or of a presence or absence of a geometrical element, both of which may correspond to a presence or an absence of an analyte to be detected.
  • any values selected, or determined, for a pre-determined threshold may be verified, by testing a specific algorithm, which is used for evaluating any of the image quality parameters QPx, by applying said algorithm to a set of test data, specifically image test data.
  • image test data usually comprise images of different levels of quality with respect to one or more image quality parameters QPx, such as different levels of image noise, of smoothing applied, and/or of intensity gradients.
  • said different levels of quality may be introduced artificially, such as by decreasing, e.g. stepwise, a signal-to-noise ratio of an image, by increasingly applying smoothing to an image, or by adding intensity gradients to an image.
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) is assigned, independently from one another, corresponding to each one of a plurality of sub-ranges of image quality values QVx, as contemplated herein above.
  • a specific individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) such as 0, 1 or 2 may represent a specific category of, or level of, a quality in respect of a corresponding image quality parameter QPx.
  • a specific individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) of 0 may represent a category of, or a level of, an insufficient quality in respect of a corresponding image quality parameter QPx.
  • the predetermined threshold values TV(QPx), e.g. TV(QPl), and the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX), e.g. IAV(QP1), respectively, may be considered, and exemplified by using arbitrary numbers.
  • the full range of image quality values QV1, which may be obtainable for QP1, may include any numerical value in a range of from 0 to 10.
  • the threshold values TVi(QPl) and TV2(QP1) will separate the full range of obtainable image quality values QV1, into three sub-ranges of image quality values QV1.
  • Each of the three sub-ranges of image quality values QV1 may correspond to a different one of three individual numerical quality assessment values lAV(QPl), respectively.
  • the full range of image quality values QV1, obtainable for QP1, includes any numerical value in a range of from 0 to 10;
  • step iv) from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii), an overall image quality assessment value OAV is derived.
  • deriving the OAV may comprise combining, specifically by applying a mathematical function, two or more, specifically all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii).
  • the mathematical function may be, or may comprise, any basic or more complex type of calculation, including, but not being limited to, one or more of an addition, a subtraction, a multiplication, a division, and the like, and/or any combinations thereof.
  • the mathematical function may be a simple addition of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii); or the mathematical function may be an addition of the squares of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii); or the mathematical function may be a multiplication of said IAV(QPX) values.
  • Other alternatives for the mathematical function may be conceived.
  • deriving the OAV in step iv) may comprise combining, by applying a mathematical function, e.g. an addition of two or more, particularly all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii).
  • a mathematical function e.g. an addition of two or more, particularly all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii).
  • an image quality value QV1 and QV2 is determined, in step ii), from the image received in step (i), independently from one another, for each of QP1 and QP2, respectively.
  • each of QV1 and QV2 determined in step (ii) is compared, independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPl) and TV(QP2), respectively.
  • pre-determined threshold values TV(QPl) and TV(QP2) For example, for QP1, only one threshold value TV(QPl) may be selected, or determined, whereas for QP2, two TVi(QP2) and TV2(QP2) may be selected, or determined.
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) is assigned to each of QP1 and QP2 of step (ii), e.g. in this case lAV(QPl) and IAV(QP2).
  • an overall image quality assessment value OAV may be derived, by way of a mathematical addition, i.e. by adding one of the two numerical values of lAV(QPl) and one of the three numerical values of IAV(QP2).
  • OAV may be one of the following numerical values, i.e.
  • the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) is compared to at least one overall pre-determined threshold value OTV.
  • the overall pre-determined threshold value OTV is a numerical value, e.g. 2, 3, 4 or 5, or any other numerical value appropriately selected, or determined, with regard to the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX).
  • the OAV since the OAV is derived from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX), the OAV generally represents a combination of said individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX). Therefore, each of the IAV(QPX) may contribute to the OAV.
  • the OAV thus is an indicator of an overall level of quality of an image, such as the image received in step i), said indicator taking into account each of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX).
  • the overall pre -determined threshold value OTV may be selected, or determined, to be a numerical value which provides an assessment of an overall level of quality of an image, such as the image received in step i), in alignment with the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) which have been initially selected, or determined, for each of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • the overall image quality assessment value OAV in this setting may be one of the following numerical values: 0, 1, 2 or 3; then in this setting, a numerical value of 0 or 1 for OAV may be representative of a category of, or level of, an insufficient quality in respect of the overall image quality assessment value OAV; whereas a numerical value of 2 or 3 for OAV may be representative of a category of, or level of, a sufficient quality in respect of the overall image quality assessment value OAV.
  • the OAV thus is an indicator of the suitability of the image received in step (i) to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the overall image quality assessment value OAV is less than the at least one overall predetermined threshold value OTV, then the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may be determined to be insufficient with respect to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may be determined to be sufficient with respect to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the skilled person will readily realize that other ways of applying a particular threshold may be used as well, depending inter alia on the ways used to assign, in step iii), an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) to each of the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii), e.g.
  • the overall image quality assessment value OAV e.g. by way of addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may be displayed, e.g. on a display of the mobile device.
  • the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) and/or the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) indicate a level of, or a category of, a poor quality of an image with respect to one or more of the image quality parameters QPx
  • additional information relating to such a poor quality of the image received in step i) may be useful, particularly in connection with the analytical measurement method of the present invention.
  • such additional information may comprise a remark or a warning.
  • a warning may be displayed, e.g. on the display of the mobile device, that a result of a detection of an analyte, obtained by performing the analytical measurement method of the present invention, may be inaccurate; or that no detection of the analyte can be performed.
  • a remark may be displayed, e.g. on the display of the mobile device, that a result of detection of an analyte, obtained by performing the analytical measurement method of the present invention, may have a reduced accuracy.
  • one or more prompts may be displayed, e.g.
  • step i) comprises a comparatively high level of illumination inhomogeneity
  • a prompt may comprise a recommendation to avoid any shadows, or any external light, within the camera’s field of view.
  • step i) comprises a comparatively high level of noise
  • such a prompt may comprise a recommendation to repeat step i), e.g. by capturing another image, but in a brighter environment.
  • the method may further comprise, if at least one of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the image quality parameter QPx affected, iii. 1) obtaining another image according to step i); or iii.2) aborting the method.
  • step iv) is performed only if none of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of any of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of one or more of the image quality parameters QPx of step ii e.g.
  • step iv) will not be performed; instead, either of steps iv. 1) or iv.2) may be performed.
  • the method may further comprise, if the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the at least one overall pre-determined threshold value OTV, iv.l) obtaining another image according to step i); or iv.2) aborting the method.
  • the method comprises the following steps which, as an example, may be performed in the given order. It shall be noted, however, that a different order may also be possible. Further, it may also be possible to perform one or more of the method steps once or repeatedly. Further, it may be possible to perform two or more of the method steps simultaneously or in a timely overlapping fashion. The method may comprise further method steps which are not listed.
  • step iv if the item of information about the quality of the image captured in step (i) is determined, in step iv), to indicate that the quality of the image is sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid, detecting, by evaluating the image received in step (i), specifically by the processor of the mobile device, the at least one analyte from the at least one optical detection reaction at the at least one reagent test region of the optical test element.
  • detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid may comprise determining a presence or absence of the analyte in the bodily fluid. Further, in step II), detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid may comprise determining a concentration of the analyte in the bodily fluid.
  • the analytical measurement method further may comprise providing the optical test element.
  • the analytical measurement method may further comprise a step of displaying a result of the analytical measurement, such as an indication of a presence or an absence of an analyte, or an indication of an analyte concentration value, e.g. on a display of the mobile device.
  • a notification and/or a warning may be displayed, depending on one or more of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) and the overall image quality assessment value OAV.
  • the method may comprise storing a result, such as an analyte concentration value, in at least one data storage device of the mobile device.
  • the method may further comprise transmitting a result, e.g. an analyte concentration value, via at least one interface and/or via at least one data transmission network, such as to another computer, e.g. for further evaluation or processing.
  • the present invention relates to a mobile device having at least one camera and at least one processor, the mobile device being configured for
  • the mobile device further is configured for performing at least steps i) to iv) of the method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, as described herein above;
  • the mobile device further is configured for performing at least steps I) to II) of the analytical measurement method, as described herein above.
  • the present invention relates to a kit, comprising the mobile device, as described herein above, and at least one optical test element having at least one reagent test region, wherein the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the present invention relates to a computer program comprising instructions which,
  • the present invention relates to a computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which,
  • Fig. 2 B shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a maximum illumination parameter, illustrating a maximum illumination in a suboptimal range.
  • Fig. 2 C shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a maximum illumination parameter, illustrating a maximum illumination in a saturated range.
  • Fig. 3 B shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a noise parameter, illustrating a medium signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Fig. 3 C shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a noise parameter, illustrating a low signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Fig. 4 A shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a sharpness parameter, specifically illustrating an effect of image compression.
  • Fig. 4 B further illustrates the sharpness parameter from the example of Fig. 4 A.
  • Fig. 4 C shows another example of an image quality parameter QPx, wherein QPx is a sharpness parameter, specifically illustrating an effect of image smoothing.
  • Fig. 4 D further illustrates the sharpness parameter from the example of Fig. 4 C.
  • Fig. 5 shows an embodiment of a kit and a mobile device for performing an analytical measurement, illustrated in a perspective view.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment for carrying out the method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment for carrying out the analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid, according to the present invention.
  • the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, and a spatial characteristic of an image.
  • the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx independently from one another, may be configured to assess at least one of: illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • the pre-determined set of image quality parameters QPx may comprise 4 image quality parameters QPx, specifically illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • Some different specific levels of quality may be represented by, or may correspond to, a pre -determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values.
  • the pre-determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values may comprise, or may consist of, the numerical values 0, 1, and 2, respectively.
  • the numerical values 0, 1, and 2 in this example, may represent an increasing level of quality with respect to a particular image quality parameter QPx.
  • Fig. 1 A to 1 C show an example of an image quality parameter QPx, such as QP1, wherein QP1 is an illumination inhomogeneity parameter.
  • This illumination inhomogeneity parameter can be quantified by evaluating the distribution of a brightness across regions of the image that represent white regions of the test element. When the brightness profile in these regions is determined to comprise a wide range, then the image comprises a significant level of illumination inhomogeneity.
  • an image quality value QVx such as QV1 may be derived, from each of the images in Fig. 1 A, 1 B, and 1 C, respectively, independently from one another, by evaluating the brightness profile of each image.
  • the image quality parameter QP1 relates to an inhomogeneity of brightness, i.e. to an inhomogeneity of intensity in a white region of an image, and thus, in other words, to a difference of the brightest and the darkest spots in an image.
  • Fig. 1 B illustrates a low illumination inhomogeneity.
  • an image quality value QV1 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TVi(QPl), not pass said threshold value TVi(QPl), e.g. QV1 ⁇ TVi(QPl), but may still pass a second predetermined threshold value TV2(QP1), e.g. TV2(QP1) ⁇ QV1 ⁇ TVi(QPl).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value lAV(QPl) different to the one assigned before (with respect to Fig. 1 A), can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP1.
  • Fig. 1 C illustrates a medium illumination inhomogeneity.
  • an image quality value QV1 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TV2(QP1), not pass said threshold value TV2(QP1), e.g. QV1 ⁇ TV2(QP1).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value lAV(QPl) different to the ones assigned before (with respect to Fig. 1 A and Fig. 1 B, respectively), can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP1.
  • Fig. 2 A to 2 C show another example of an image quality parameter QPx, such as QP2, wherein QP2 is a maximum illumination parameter.
  • the maximum illumination of an image can be used to identify dark or saturated images.
  • the distribution of a brightness across regions of an image that represent white regions of a test element can be used to filter out outliers in order to reliably identify any maxima of brightness.
  • the image quality parameter QP2, as exemplified herein thus relates to a maximum of the brightness.
  • an image quality value QVx such as QV2 may be derived, from each of the images in Fig. 2 A, 2 B, and 2 C, respectively, independently from one another, by evaluating the maximum illumination of each image.
  • Fig. 2 A illustrates a maximum illumination in an optimal range.
  • an image quality value QV2 derived from this image may, when compared to a first pre -determined threshold value TVi(QP2), readily pass said threshold value TVi(QP2), e.g. QV2 > TVi(QP2).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP2) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP2.
  • Fig. 2 B illustrates a maximum illumination in a suboptimal range.
  • an image quality value QV2 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TVi(QP2), not pass said threshold value TVi(QP2), e.g. QV2 ⁇ TVi(QP2), but may still pass a second pre-determined threshold value TV2(QP2), e.g. TV2(QP2) ⁇ QV2 ⁇ TVi(QP2).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP2) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP2.
  • Fig. 2 C illustrates a maximum illumination in a saturated range.
  • an image quality value QV2 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TV2(QP2), not pass said threshold value TV2(QP2), e.g. QV2 ⁇ TV2(QP2).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP2) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP2.
  • an IAV(QP2) 0 may be assigned to QP2, which in this case reflects a poor, and thus insufficient, level of quality with regard to the image quality parameter QP2.
  • Fig. 3 A to 3 C show another example of an image quality parameter QPx, such as QP3, wherein QP3 is a noise parameter.
  • the noise parameter also referred to as “image noise” parameter
  • an image quality value QVx, such as QV3 may be derived, from each of the images in Fig. 3 A, 3 B, and 3 C, respectively, independently from one another, by evaluating the signal -to-noise ratio of each image.
  • Fig. 3 A illustrates a very high signal-to-noise ratio.
  • an image quality value QV3 derived from this image may, when compared to a first pre-determined threshold value TVi(QP3), readily pass said threshold value TVi(QP3), e.g. QV3 > TVi(QP3).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP3) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP3.
  • an IAV(QP3) 2 may be assigned to QP3, which in this case reflects a very good level of quality with regard to the image quality parameter QP3.
  • Fig. 3 B illustrates a medium signal-to-noise ratio.
  • an image quality value QV3 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TVi(QP3), not pass said threshold value TVi(QP3), e.g. QV3 ⁇ TVi(QP3), but may still pass a second pre-determined threshold value TV2(QP3), e.g. TV2(QP3) ⁇ QV3 ⁇ TVi(QP3).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP3) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP3.
  • Fig. 3 C illustrates a low signal-to-noise ratio.
  • an image quality value QV3 derived from this image may, when compared to the pre-determined threshold value TV2(QP3), not pass said threshold value TV2(QP3), e.g. QV3 ⁇ TV2(QP3).
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP3) can be assigned to the image quality parameter QP3.
  • an IAV(QP3) 0 may be assigned to QP3, which in this case reflects a poor, and thus insufficient, level of quality with regard to the image quality parameter QP3.
  • Fig. 4 A to 4 D show another example of an image quality parameter QPx, such as QP4, wherein QP4 is a sharpness parameter.
  • Determining a sharpness can be achieved by e.g., but not limited to, an evaluation of an image power spectral density.
  • Such an evaluation of the image power spectral density usually reflects any smoothing applied and, therefore, provides a measure of a level of quality of an image, independent of any smartphone-specific pre-testing or pre-calibration, and without a need for using a color reference card.
  • smooth- ing or extensive image compression can be detected from a two-dimensional Fourier transform.
  • the information contained in the two-dimensional Fourier transform can be averaged radially (specifically with the center located at 0,0 frequency). Such radial averaging reduces the dimensionality. Furthermore, it facilitates an interpretation of the spectral characteristics of an image. Lossy compression of images, i.e. with wherein a certain amount of information is lost upon compression of an image, alters the power spectral density of images. Such an alteration can be read from the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform. Specifically, the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform may be compared for one and the same image before and after compression of said image, thereby illustrating an effect of such image compression. Additionally or alternatively, the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform may be compared for one and the same image before and after smoothing, or filtering, of said image, thereby illustrating an effect of such image smoothing.
  • Fig. 4 A specifically illustrates an effect of image compression.
  • a test element such as a lateral flow assay, e.g. for virus detection, comprising a sharp edge and a non-insignificant level of noise, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio
  • a lateral flow assay e.g. for virus detection
  • a non-insignificant level of noise i.e. signal-to-noise ratio
  • the same image but after being compressed with an algorithm from the Joint Photographic Experts Group (standard JPEG, 8bit) with a low quality factor of 25%
  • the bottom part of Fig. 4 A shows a signal, i.e. pixel values, of a single row from the green channel of the image before and after compression.
  • Fig. 4 B shows a comparison of the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the images before and after compression. From Fig. 4 B, it can be deduced that, after compression, some information in the higher spatial frequencies is lost from the original image. This is because the intensity of the Fourier transform depicted for the compressed image is found to be at higher spatial frequencies below the intensity of the Fourier transform depicted for the non-compressed image, indicating that less information is contained at said higher spatial frequencies.
  • Fig. 4 C specifically illustrates an effect of image smoothing.
  • a test element such as a lateral flow assay, e.g. for virus detection, comprising a sharp edge and a non-insignificant level of noise, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio
  • the bottom part of Fig. 4 C shows a signal, i.e. pixel values, of a single row from the green channel of the image before and after compression.
  • Fig. 4 D shows a comparison of the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the images before and after compression. From Fig. 4 D, it can be deduced that, after compression, some information in the higher spatial frequencies is lost from the original image. This is because the intensity of the Fourier transform depicted for the smoothed image is found to be at higher spatial frequencies below the intensity of the Fourier transform depicted for the non-smoothed image, indicating that less information is contained at said higher spatial frequencies.
  • the exponent that best describes the radial average decay of the two-dimensional Fourier transform is a suitable measure in order to identify optimal and non-optimal, or suboptimal, sharpness.
  • the sharpness of a control line of the LFA can be employed for this purpose.
  • the radial average of the two-dimensional Fourier transform of an image may be used to derive an image quality value QV4 for the image quality parameter QP4, which can be compared to a pre -determined threshold value TV(QP4). Based on the comparison, an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QP4) may be assigned to QP4.
  • kits 148 and a mobile device specifically configured for performing an analytical measurement
  • the kit 148 comprises a mobile device 112 and at least one optical test element 118.
  • the mobile device 112, having a camera 114 may further comprise a processor 149.
  • the mobile device 112, specifically by using a processor 149 may be configured for performing the methods described herein.
  • the optical test element 118 may be an optical test strip.
  • the optical test element 118 specifically has at least one reagent test region 120, wherein the at least one reagent test region 120 is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the reagent test region 120 may contain at least one test chemical for detecting at least one analyte in the sample of bodily fluid.
  • the optical test element 118 further may contain a reference field 121.
  • the mobile device 112, as illustrated in Fig. 5, may capture the at least one image 124 received in step (i), by using the camera 114, wherein the image 124 comprises at least a part of the reagent test region 120 of the optical test element 118 having the sample of the bodily fluid applied thereto.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment for carrying out the method, specifically the computer-implemented method, for determining an item of information about a quality of an image according to the present invention, e.g. by making use of the kit as shown in Fig. 5.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image relates to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the at least one analyte is detected from the at least one reagent test region 120 of the optical test element 120.
  • the at least one reagent test region 120 is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may comprise Boolean information. More specifically, said Boolean information may indicate that the quality of the image is sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid. Alternatively, said Boolean information may indicate that the quality of the image is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method.
  • the method for determining an item of information about a quality of an image is performed by using the mobile device 112 having at least one camera 114.
  • the mobile device 112 has at least one processor 149.
  • the method comprises, in a first step i), depicted with reference numeral 100 in Fig. 6, receiving, specifically by the processor 149 of the mobile device 112, the at least one image 124 captured by the camera 114 of the mobile device 112.
  • the image 124 comprises at least a part of the reagent test region 120 of the optical test element 118.
  • the reagent test region 120 has a sample of the bodily fluid applied thereto.
  • the method further comprises, in step ii), depicted with reference numeral 200 in Fig. 6, deriving, from the image received in step (i), independently from one another, an image quality value QVx for each of at least two different image quality parameters QPx.
  • the at least two different image quality parameters QPx are selected from a pre -determined set of image quality parameters QP 1 to QPn, wherein x is a numerical value from 1 to n, and wherein n is the total number of image quality parameters contained in the pre -determined set of image quality parame- ters.
  • the pre-determined set of image quality parameters comprises, specifically consists of, 3 image quality parameters, namely QP1, QP2, and QP3.
  • the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, and a spatial characteristic of an image.
  • the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another are configured to assess at least one of: illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • the image quality parameters QPx specifically illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness, are quantifiable. In particular, they are quantified by the image quality values QVx derived in step ii).
  • the method further comprises, in step iii), depicted with reference numeral 300 in Fig. 6, comparing each of the image quality values QVx derived in step (ii), independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx).
  • the pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx) are numerical values, which may be selected, or determined, by a series of experimental data, e.g. from a calibration curve, prior to carrying out the method of the present invention.
  • Each of the pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx) is adapted to the specific image quality value QVx.
  • more than one pre-determined threshold value TV(QPx) may be used for one, or more, e.g. 2, or 3, or all, of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) is assigned, independently from one another, to each of the at least two different image quality parameters QPx of step (ii).
  • the individual numerical quality assessment values are selected from a pre-determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values.
  • the pre-determined set of individual numerical quality assessment values may comprise, or consist of, e.g. the numbers 0 and 1; 0, 1, and 2; 0, 1, 2, and 3.
  • any specific individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX), such as 0, 1 or 2 may represent a specific category of, or level of, a quality in respect of a corresponding image quality parameter QPx.
  • a specific individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) of 0 may represent a category of, or a level of, an insufficient quality in respect of a corresponding image quality parameter QPx.
  • the method may further comprise, if at least one, e.g. 1, 2, 3, or 4, or all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to one or more of the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the image quality parameter QPx affected, an additional step iii. l), and/or an additional step iii.2), as follows: iii. 1) receiving another image according to step i); or iii.2) aborting the method.
  • step iii. l) may be performed once, or more than once, before step iii.2) is performed. Additionally or alternatively, step iv) of the method may be performed only if none of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of any of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • the method further comprises, in step iv), depicted with reference numeral 400 in Fig. 6, deriving, from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii), an overall image quality assessment value OAV.
  • deriving the overall image quality assessment value OAV may comprise combining, specifically by applying a mathematical function, such as an addition, two or more, e.g. all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii).
  • step ii) for three image quality parameters QP1, QP2, and QP3, image quality values QV1, QV2, and QV3 may have been derived; and, based on the comparing of each of said image quality values QV1, QV2, and QV3 to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPl), TV(QP2), and TV(QP3), an individual numerical quality assessment value lAV(QPl), IAV(QP2), and IAV(QP3), respectively, may have been assigned to each of the image quality parameters QP1, QP2, and QP3, respectively.
  • the method comprises comparing the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) to at least one overall pre-determined threshold value OTV.
  • the overall predetermined threshold value OTV is a numerical value, which may be selected, or determined, by a series of experimental data, prior to carrying out the method of the present invention. Still further, in step iv), the method comprises, based on the comparing of OAV with OTV, determining the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i).
  • the overall image quality assessment value OAV in this example, has passed the overall predetermined threshold value OTV, this may indicate that the level, or category, of quality of the image received in step ii) is high (or good, or acceptable; whatever name, or label, may be applied to this specific quality level) and thus, particularly sufficient with respect to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may be determined, in step iv), to be sufficient with respect to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) may be determined, in step iv), to be insufficient with respect to the suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid.
  • the method may further comprise, if the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the at least one overall pre-determined threshold value OTV, an additional step iv.l), and/or an additional step iv.2), as follows: iv.l) obtaining another image according to step i); or iv.2) aborting the method.
  • step iii. l) may be performed once, or more than once, before step iii.2) is performed.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment for carrying out the analytical measurement method, specifically a computer-implemented method and/or an in-vitro method, for detecting at least one analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid according to the present invention, e.g. by making use of the kit 148 as shown in Fig. 5.
  • the analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid is performed by using the mobile device 112 having at least one camera 114, and specifically at least one processor 149.
  • the at least one analyte is detected from at least one reagent test region 120 of an optical test element 118.
  • the at least one reagent test region 120 is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • the analytical measurement method comprises, in a first step I), depicted by reference numeral 500, performing the method for determining an item of information about a quality of the image 124 received in step (i).
  • the analytical measurement method further comprises, in step II), depicted by reference numeral 600, determining, in step iv), whether or not the item of information about the quality of the image captured in step (i) indicates that the quality of the image, received in step i), is sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid.
  • step (i) If, as a result of said determination, the item of information about the quality of the image captured in step (i) indicates that the quality of the image, received in step i), is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method, then either another image may be received, e.g. by repeating step i), or the method may be aborted. Specifically, if another image should be received, a prompt message indicating so may be displayed, e.g. on a display of the mobile device 112. Otherwise, if the method is aborted, a message may be displayed, e.g. on the display of the mobile device 112, informing about a poor quality of the image received in step i).
  • step II the at least one analyte is detected.
  • the image received in step (i) is evaluated, and the analyte is detected from the at least one optical detection reaction at the at least one reagent test region 120 of the optical test element 118.
  • the detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid may comprise determining a concentration of the analyte in the bodily fluid.
  • the present invention comprises the following embodiments:
  • Embodiment 1 A method, specifically a computer-implemented method, for determining an item of information about a quality of an image, wherein the item of information about the quality of the image relates to a suitability of the image to be used in an analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a bodily fluid, wherein the at least one analyte is detected from at least one reagent test region of an optical test element, and wherein the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte; by using a mobile device having at least one camera, the method comprising:
  • step (ii) deriving, from the image received in step (i), independently from one another, an image quality value QVx for each of at least two different image quality parameters QPx, selected from a predetermined set of image quality parameters QP1 to QPn, wherein x is a numerical value from 1 to n, and wherein n is the total number of image quality parameters contained in the pre-determined set of image quality parameters, wherein the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, are configured to assess at least one of: a color characteristic of an image, and a spatial characteristic of an image; (iii) comparing each of the image quality values QVx derived in step (ii), independently from one another, to one or more pre-determined threshold values TV(QPx); and, based on the comparing, assigning, independently from one another, an individual numerical quality assessment value IAV(QPX) to each of the at least two different image quality parameters QPx of step (ii), wherein the individual numerical quality assessment values are selected from
  • step (iv) deriving, from the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii), an overall image quality assessment value OAV; comparing said overall image quality assessment value OAV to at least one overall pre -determined threshold value OTV; and, based on the comparing, determining the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i).
  • Embodiment 2 The computer-implemented method according to embodiment 1, wherein the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) comprises Boolean information, specifically Boolean information indicating that the quality of the image is either sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid, or that the quality of the image is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method.
  • the item of information about the quality of the image received in step (i) comprises Boolean information, specifically Boolean information indicating that the quality of the image is either sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid, or that the quality of the image is not sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method.
  • Embodiment 3 The computer-implemented method according to embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the at least two of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, are configured to assess at least one of: illumination inhomogeneity, maximum illumination, noise, and sharpness.
  • Embodiment 4 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein, the set of individual numerical quality assessment values of step (iii) comprises, for at least two of the image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, at least a first individual numerical quality assessment value LAVI (QPx) and a second individual numerical quality assessment value IAV2(QPx), wherein lAVl(QPx) ⁇ IAV2(QPx), and wherein the first lAVl(QPx) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of an image quality parameter QPx; wherein the set of individual numerical quality assessment values further may comprise, for the at least two image quality parameters QPx, independently from one another, one or more additional individual numerical quality assessment values, e.g.
  • Embodiment 5 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding embodiments, further comprising, if at least one of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a predetermined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the image quality parameter QPx affected,
  • Embodiment 6 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding embodiments, further comprising, if the overall image quality assessment value OAV derived in step iv) corresponds to a pre -determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of the at least one overall pre-determined threshold value OTV, iv. 1) receiving another image according to step i); or iv.2) aborting the method.
  • Embodiment 7 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the two preceding embodiments, wherein steps iii. l), iii.2), iv.l) and/or iv.2) are performed only if at least one, specifically both, of the following criteria is met:
  • Embodiment 8 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein step iv) is performed only if none of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii) to the image quality parameters QPx of step (ii) corresponds to a pre-determined category of an insufficient quality in respect of any of the image quality parameters QPx.
  • Embodiment 9 The computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein, in step (iv), deriving the overall image quality assessment value OAV comprises combining, by applying a mathematical function, two or more, specifically all, of the individual numerical quality assessment values IAV(QPX) assigned in step (iii).
  • Embodiment 10 A computer-implemented analytical measurement method for detecting at least one analyte in a sample of a bodily fluid by using a mobile device having at least one camera, wherein the at least one analyte is detected from at least one reagent test region of an optical test element, and wherein the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte, the method comprising:
  • step (i) performing the computer-implemented method of any one of embodiments 1 to 9 for determining an item of information about a quality of the image received in step (i);
  • step iv if the item of information about the quality of the image captured in step (i) is determined, in step iv), to indicate that the quality of the image is sufficient for use of the image in the analytical measurement method for detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid, detecting, by evaluating the image captured in step (i), the at least one analyte from the at least one optical detection reaction at the at least one reagent test region of the optical test element.
  • Embodiment 11 The computer-implemented analytical measurement method according to any one of the preceding embodiments referring to an analytical measurement method, wherein detecting the at least one analyte in the bodily fluid comprises determining a concentration of the analyte in the bodily fluid.
  • Embodiment 12 The computer-implemented analytical measurement method according to any one of the preceding embodiments referring to an analytical measurement method, wherein the optical test element is selected from the group comprising a test strip, a test assay, specifically a lateral flow assay, a test stick, specifically a test dipstick, a test cassette, a test tape, a test paper, and a test chip.
  • the optical test element is selected from the group comprising a test strip, a test assay, specifically a lateral flow assay, a test stick, specifically a test dipstick, a test cassette, a test tape, a test paper, and a test chip.
  • Embodiment 13 The computer-implemented analytical measurement method according to any one of the preceding embodiments referring to an analytical measurement method, wherein the method further comprises providing the optical test element.
  • Embodiment 14 A mobile device having at least one camera and at least one processor, the mobile device being configured for
  • the mobile device further is configured for performing at least steps i) to iv) of the computer-implemented method according to any one of embodiments 1 to 9; or
  • the mobile device further is configured for performing at least steps I) to II) of the computer-implemented analytical measurement method according to any one of embodiments 10 to 13.
  • Embodiment 15 A kit, comprising the mobile device according to embodiment 14, and at least one optical test element having at least one reagent test region, wherein the at least one reagent test region is configured for performing at least one optical detection reaction in the presence of the analyte.
  • Embodiment 16 A computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by the mobile device according to embodiment 14, cause the mobile device to carry out
  • Embodiment 17 A computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by the mobile device according to embodiment 14, cause the mobile device to carry out

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur pour déterminer un élément d'information concernant une qualité d'une image, l'élément d'information concernant la qualité de l'image se rapportant au fait qu'une image est adaptée à une utilisation dans un procédé de mesure analytique pour détecter au moins un analyte dans un fluide corporel, le ou les analytes étant détectés à partir d'au moins une région de test de réactif d'un élément de test optique ; à l'aide d'un dispositif mobile ayant au moins un appareil de prise de vues, le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à : (i) recevoir au moins une image capturée à l'aide de l'appareil de prise de vues, l'image comprenant au moins une partie de la région de test de réactif de l'élément de test optique sur lequel est appliqué l'échantillon du fluide corporel ; (ii) dériver, à partir de l'image reçue à l'étape (i), indépendamment l'une de l'autre, une valeur de qualité d'image QVx pour chacun d'au moins deux paramètres de qualité d'image QPx différents, sélectionnés parmi un ensemble prédéterminé de paramètres de qualité d'image QP1 à QPn, les au moins deux des paramètres de qualité d'image QPx, indépendamment l'un de l'autre, étant configurés pour évaluer au moins l'un parmi : une caractéristique de couleur d'une image, et une caractéristique spatiale d'une image ; (iii) comparer chacune des valeurs de qualité d'image QVx dérivées à l'étape (ii), indépendamment les unes des autres, à une ou plusieurs valeurs de seuil TV(QPx) prédéterminées ; et, sur la base de la comparaison, attribuer, indépendamment les unes des autres, une valeur d'évaluation de qualité numérique individuelle IAV(QPx) à chacun des au moins deux paramètres de qualité d'image QPx différents de l'étape (ii), les valeurs d'évaluation de qualité numérique individuelles étant sélectionnées à partir d'un ensemble prédéterminé de valeurs d'évaluation de qualité numérique individuelles ; et (iv) dériver, à partir des valeurs d'évaluation de qualité numérique individuelles IAV(QPx) attribuées à l'étape (iii), une valeur d'évaluation de qualité d'image globale OAV ; comparer ladite valeur d'évaluation de qualité d'image globale OAV à une valeur de seuil prédéterminée globale OTV ; et, sur la base de la comparaison, déterminer l'élément d'information concernant la qualité de l'image reçue à l'étape (i), l'étape iv) étant effectuée uniquement si aucune des valeurs d'évaluation de qualité numérique individuelles IAV(QPx) attribuée à l'étape (iii) aux paramètres de qualité d'image QPx de l'étape (ii) ne correspond à une catégorie prédéterminée d'une qualité insuffisante par rapport à l'un quelconque des paramètres de qualité d'image QPx.
PCT/EP2024/085633 2023-12-14 2024-12-11 Procédé de détermination d'un élément d'information sur une qualité d'une image Pending WO2025125304A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP23216715 2023-12-14
EP23216715.5 2023-12-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2025125304A1 true WO2025125304A1 (fr) 2025-06-19

Family

ID=89223042

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2024/085633 Pending WO2025125304A1 (fr) 2023-12-14 2024-12-11 Procédé de détermination d'un élément d'information sur une qualité d'une image

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2025125304A1 (fr)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1080343A (en) 1911-04-01 1913-12-02 United Shoe Machinery Ab Sewing-machine.
US10171773B2 (en) 2016-12-12 2019-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic video image management
US20210096083A1 (en) * 2018-06-11 2021-04-01 Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. Method for calibrating a camera of a mobile device for detecting an analyte in a sample
US20210373008A1 (en) * 2020-05-29 2021-12-02 Quidel Corporation System and methods for remote assessment of a sample assay for disease diagnostics
US20210374959A1 (en) * 2020-05-29 2021-12-02 Quidel Corporation Software and algorithms for use in remote assessment of disease diagnostics
US20220084659A1 (en) * 2020-09-17 2022-03-17 Scanwell Health, Inc. Diagnostic test kits and methods of analyzing the same
US20220317050A1 (en) 2019-12-23 2022-10-06 Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. Adjustment method for adjusting a setup for an analytical method
US11475596B2 (en) 2020-07-23 2022-10-18 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Device, method and system for adjusting a configuration of a camera device
US20230057531A1 (en) * 2021-08-17 2023-02-23 Emed Labs, Llc Mobile device stands for at-home diagnostics and healthcare

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1080343A (en) 1911-04-01 1913-12-02 United Shoe Machinery Ab Sewing-machine.
US10171773B2 (en) 2016-12-12 2019-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic video image management
US20210096083A1 (en) * 2018-06-11 2021-04-01 Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. Method for calibrating a camera of a mobile device for detecting an analyte in a sample
US20220317050A1 (en) 2019-12-23 2022-10-06 Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. Adjustment method for adjusting a setup for an analytical method
US20210373008A1 (en) * 2020-05-29 2021-12-02 Quidel Corporation System and methods for remote assessment of a sample assay for disease diagnostics
US20210374959A1 (en) * 2020-05-29 2021-12-02 Quidel Corporation Software and algorithms for use in remote assessment of disease diagnostics
US11475596B2 (en) 2020-07-23 2022-10-18 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Device, method and system for adjusting a configuration of a camera device
US20220084659A1 (en) * 2020-09-17 2022-03-17 Scanwell Health, Inc. Diagnostic test kits and methods of analyzing the same
US20230057531A1 (en) * 2021-08-17 2023-02-23 Emed Labs, Llc Mobile device stands for at-home diagnostics and healthcare

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
J. HOENES ET AL.: "The Technology Behind Glucose Meters: Test Strips", DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, vol. 10, 2008, pages 10 - 26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11120553B2 (en) Methods and devices for performing an analytical measurement
US12301782B2 (en) Methods and devices for performing an analytical measurement
KR20200078548A (ko) 컬러 형성 반응에 기초하여 분석 측정을 수행하기 위한 방법들 및 디바이스들
US12287327B2 (en) Method of determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid
US20250200806A1 (en) Method and devices for performing an analytical measurement
JP2022506376A (ja) 分析測定を実行するための方法および装置
US20230103160A1 (en) Method of determining the concentration of an analyte in a sample of a body fluid
US12295730B2 (en) Method of determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid and mobile device configured for determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid
US20230262339A1 (en) Method of controlling auto-exposure settings of a mobile device having a camera
WO2025125304A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination d'un élément d'information sur une qualité d'une image
TW202542843A (zh) 判定關於影像之品質的資訊項目之方法
RU2812204C2 (ru) Способ определения концентрации аналита в физиологической жидкости и мобильное устройство, сконфигурированное для определения концентрации аналита в физиологической жидкости
RU2824298C1 (ru) Способ определения концентрации аналита в физиологической жидкости
RU2786271C2 (ru) Способ и устройства для проведения аналитического измерения
JPWO2020260246A5 (fr)
WO2025140940A1 (fr) Procédé d'évaluation de l'adéquation des réglages d'exposition automatique d'un dispositif mobile pour mettre en œuvre une mesure basée sur la couleur
HK40079521A (en) Method of determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid
HK40068290A (en) Method of determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid and mobile device configured for determining a concentration of an analyte in a bodily fluid
HK40031569A (en) Methods and devices for performing an analytical measurement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 24829394

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1