[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2025195960A1 - Procédé de signalisation d'ajustement de modèle à l'aide d'un modèle représentatif - Google Patents

Procédé de signalisation d'ajustement de modèle à l'aide d'un modèle représentatif

Info

Publication number
WO2025195960A1
WO2025195960A1 PCT/EP2025/057189 EP2025057189W WO2025195960A1 WO 2025195960 A1 WO2025195960 A1 WO 2025195960A1 EP 2025057189 W EP2025057189 W EP 2025057189W WO 2025195960 A1 WO2025195960 A1 WO 2025195960A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
model
models
representative
variation
previous
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
PCT/EP2025/057189
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Hojin Kim
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aumovio Germany GmbH
Original Assignee
Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH filed Critical Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
Publication of WO2025195960A1 publication Critical patent/WO2025195960A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/02—Arrangements for optimising operational condition
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00—Machine learning
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00—Machine learning
    • G06N20/20—Ensemble learning
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/16—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks using machine learning or artificial intelligence

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to AI/ML based model representation, where techniques for pre-configuring and signaling the specific information about representative model and variation model applicable to radio access network are presented.
  • AI/ML artificial intelligence/machine learning
  • RP-213599 3GPP TSG (Technical Specification Group) RAN (Radio Access Network) meeting #94e.
  • the official title of AI/ML study item is “Study on AI/ML for NR Air Interface”.
  • the goal of this study item is to identify a common AI/ML framework and areas of obtaining gains using AI/ML based techniques with use cases.
  • the main objective of this study item is to study AI/ML framework for air-interface with target use cases by considering performance, complexity, and potential specification impact.
  • AI/ML model terminology and description to identify common and specific characteristics for framework are included as one of key work scopes.
  • AI/ML framework various aspects are under consideration for investigation and one of key items is about lifecycle management of AI/ML model where multiple stages are included as mandatory for model training, model deployment, model inference, model monitoring, model updating etc.
  • two-sided (AI/ML) model is defined as a paired AI/ML model(s) over which joint inference is performed, where joint inference comprises AI/ML Inference whose inference is performed jointly across the UE and the network.
  • AI/ML UE-side
  • AI/ML network-side
  • UE-side (AI/ML) model is defined as an AI/ML model whose inference is performed entirely at the UE
  • AI/ML network-side
  • UE-ML user equipment
  • 3GPP TR 37.817 for Release 17, titled as Study on enhancement for Data Collection for NR and EN-DC UE (user equipment) mobility was also considered as one of AI/ML use cases and one of scenarios for model training/inference is that both functions are located within RAN node.
  • model training is one of the most important parts for model deployment and currently there is no specification defined for signaling methods and network-UE behaviors so as to identify the required dataset when model updating/re- training as any activated model can be also impacted due to model/data drift.
  • ML condition changes the enabled AI/ML model(s) can be impacted for model performance due to data/model drift. In this case, model re-training/updating can be executed.
  • ML condition refers to the (non)real-time operational state of a ML model within a wireless communication system and it includes factors such as network load, dataset availability, device ML capability status, environmental conditions (e.g., site, signal interference), and/or device power constraints that may influence the selection and activation of a variation model.
  • ML capability refers to the processing capacity and efficiency of a device (e.g., UE or network-side entity) in handling ML operations and it includes factors such as available computing resources (CPU, GPU, or NPU), memory capacity, model execution speed, supported ML frameworks, and the ability to process different complexity levels of variation models.
  • US 2023069342 describes how to assist determination of the model update time in consideration of cost for the update of a model.
  • US 2023022737 explains supporting generation of machine learning model when a certain machine learning model is changed.
  • US 2019012876 provides projections, predictions, and recommendations for computing system.
  • US 2019332895 shows that the monitored states are to decide to change a trained ML model as currently used.
  • EP 4075348 describes control of machine learning model, which can be based on a federated learning method collectively performed by nodes of a decentralized distributed database.
  • US 2021019612 provides the self-healing system that can automatically provide a diagnostic, and it can also automatically provide an action if the performance of the model predictions has changed over time.
  • the present application describes methods of using the pre-configured AI/ML (artificial intelligence/machine learning) based model representation in wireless mobile communication system including base station (e.g., gNB, TN, NTN) and mobile station (e.g., UE).
  • base station e.g., gNB, TN, NTN
  • mobile station e.g., UE
  • model operation e.g., model training/inferencing/monitoring/updating
  • model operation can be set up between network and UE by configuring representative model and the associated variation models.
  • the present disclosure solves the cited problem by the proposed embodiments and describes a method of model adjustment signaling using representative model by configuring a set of representative models within a wireless communication system, comprising: associating one or multiple variation models for a representative model; pre-determining mapping relation between representative model and the related variation model(s); setting index or ID values for representative models and variation models; providing mapping relation to UEs.
  • the method is characterized by, that one or more variation models for activation can be selected among candidate variation models associated with representative model.
  • the method is characterized by, that both representative models and variation models in mapping relation information can be indicated using index or ID value.
  • the method is characterized by, that a set of specific variation models can be determined based on the configured measurement technique such as similarity metric or K-means clustering.
  • the method is characterized by, that any available variation model(s) associated with the specific representative model can be chosen for activation depending on device ML condition or ML capability.
  • mapping relation information can be sent via system information or dedicated RRC signaling.
  • the method is characterized by, that any additional changes or updates about mapping relation information can be also sent via L1/L2 or RRC signaling.
  • the method is characterized by, that decision of specific variation model(s) can be made by either network side or UE side depending on implementation scenarios.
  • the method is characterized by, that representative model can be defined as one of available variation models, ensemble model of the aggregated variation models, or any derived model achieving the average performance across the associated variation models.
  • the method is characterized by, that multiple variation models can be chosen and activated if applicable depending on different use cases.
  • the method is characterized by, that there can be different mapping relation tables for various model applications and/or ML conditions.
  • the method is characterized by, that one or more mapping relation tables can be configured and applied to ML operation between network side and UE side.
  • the method is characterized by, that different variation models with a given representative model can have different complexity levels with inferencing performance difference.
  • the method is characterized by, that UE can select either representative model itself or any variation model(s) available at UE when representative model is transferred to UE.
  • the method is characterized by, that any activation and/or decision of selecting variation models can be performed by network side depending on implementation scenarios.
  • the present disclosure relates to an apparatus for adjustment signaling using representative model by configuring a set of representative models within a wireless communication system the apparatus comprising a wireless transceiver, a processor coupled with a memory in which computer program instructions are stored, said instructions being configured to implement steps according to any one of the embodiments of the first aspect.
  • the present disclosure relates to user Equipment comprising an apparatus according to the second aspect.
  • the present disclosure relates to Base station comprising an apparatus according to the second aspect.
  • the present disclosure relates to wireless communication system for adjustment signaling using representative model by configuring a set of representative models, wherein the wireless communication systems comprises at least a user equipment according to the third aspect, at least a gNB according according to the fourth aspect, whereby the user Equipment and the gNB each comprises a processor coupled with a memory in which computer program instructions are stored, said instructions being configured to implement steps according to the first aspect
  • the present disclosure relates to a computer program product comprising instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, configure said at least one processor to carry out a method according to the first aspect said at least one processor to carry out a method for exchanging data according to any one of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the computer program product can use any programming language, and can be in the form of source code, object code, or in any intermediate form between source code and object code, such as in a partially compiled form, or in any other desirable form.
  • the present disclosure relates to a computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, configure said at least one processor to carry out a method according to any one of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Figure 1 is an exemplary table of mapping relation between representative models and variation models.
  • Figure 2 is an exemplary block diagram of relationship structure of representative model and variation models.
  • Figure 3 is an exemplary flow chart of configuring representative models and variation models at network side.
  • Figure 4 is an exemplary flow chart of activating variation model(s) at UE side.
  • Figure 5 is an exemplary signaling flow of UE's autonomous decision for variation model(s) for activation.
  • a more general term “network node” may be used and may correspond to any type of radio network node or any network node, which communicates with a UE (directly or via another node) and/or with another network node.
  • network nodes are NodeB, MeNB, ENB, a network node belonging to MCG or SCG, base station (BS), multi-standard radio (MSR) radio node such as MSR BS, eNodeB, gNodeB, network controller, radio network controller (RNC), base station controller (BSC), relay, donor node controlling relay, base transceiver station (BTS), access point (AP), transmission points, transmission nodes, RRU, RRH, nodes in distributed antenna system (DAS), core network node (e.g.
  • MSC Mobile Switching Center
  • MME Mobility Management Entity
  • O&M Operations & Maintenance
  • OSS Operations Support System
  • SON Self Optimized Network
  • positioning node e.g. Evolved- Serving Mobile Location Centre (E-SMLC)
  • E-SMLC Evolved- Serving Mobile Location Centre
  • MDT Minimization of Drive Tests
  • test equipment physical node or software
  • terminologies such as base station/gNodeB and UE should be considered non-limiting and do in particular not imply a certain hierarchical relation between the two; in general, “gNodeB” could be considered as device 1 and “UE” could be considered as device 2 and these two devices communicate with each other over some radio channel. And in the following the transmitter or receiver could be either gNodeB (gNB), or UE.
  • gNB gNodeB
  • embodiments may be embodied as a system, apparatus, method, or program product. Accordingly, embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects.
  • the disclosed embodiments may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom very-large-scale integration (“VLSI”) circuits or gate arrays, off- the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components.
  • VLSI very-large-scale integration
  • the disclosed embodiments may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices, or the like.
  • the disclosed embodiments may include one or more physical or logical blocks of executable code which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function.
  • embodiments may take the form of a program product embodied in one or more computer readable storage devices storing machine readable code, computer readable code, and/or program code, referred hereafter as code.
  • the storage devices may be tangible, non- transitory, and/or non-transmission.
  • the storage devices may not embody signals. In a certain embodiment, the storage devices only employ signals for accessing code Any combination of one or more computer readable medium may be utilized.
  • the computer readable medium may be a computer readable storage medium.
  • the computer readable storage medium may be a storage device storing the code.
  • the storage device may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, holographic, micromechanical, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • a storage device More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the storage device would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random-access memory (“RAM”), a read-only memory (“ROM”), an erasable programmable read-only memory (“EPROM” or Flash memory), a portable compact disc readonly memory (“CD-ROM”), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • Code for carrying out operations for embodiments may be any number of lines and may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages including an object- oriented programming language such as Python, Ruby, Java, Smalltalk, C++, or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language, or the like, and/or machine languages such as assembly languages.
  • the code may execute entirely on the user’s computer, partly on the user’s computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user’s computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
  • the remote computer may be connected to the user’s computer through any type of network, including a local area network (“LAN”), wireless LAN (“WLAN”), or a wide area network (“WAN”), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider (“ISP”)).
  • LAN local area network
  • WLAN wireless LAN
  • WAN wide area network
  • ISP Internet Service Provider
  • This code may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the fimctions/acts specified in the flowchart diagrams and/or block diagrams
  • the code may also be stored in a storage device that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the storage device produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart diagrams and/or block diagrams.
  • the code may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the code which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart diagrams and/or block diagrams.
  • each block in the flowchart diagrams and/or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which includes one or more executable instructions of the code for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • the disclosure is related to wireless communication system, which may be for example a 5G NR wireless communication system. More specifically, it represents a RAN of the wireless communication system, which is used exchange data with UEs via radio signals. For example, the RAN may send data to the UEs (downlink, DL), for instance data received from a core network (CN). The RAN may also receive data from the UEs (uplink, UL), which data may be forwarded to the CN.
  • DL downlink
  • CN core network
  • uplink, UL uplink
  • the RAN comprises one base station, BS.
  • the RAN may comprise more than one BS to increase the coverage of the wireless communication system.
  • Each of these BSs may be referred to as NB, eNodeB (or eNB), gNodeB (or gNB, in the case of a 5G NR wireless communication system), an access point or the like, depending on the wireless communication standard(s) implemented.
  • the UEs are located in a coverage of the BS.
  • the coverage of the BS corresponds for example to the area in which UEs can decode a PDCCH transmitted by the BS.
  • An example of a wireless device suitable for implementing any method, discussed in the present disclosure, performed at a UE corresponds to an apparatus that provides wireless connectivity with the RAN of the wireless communication system, and that can be used to exchange data with said RAN.
  • a wireless device may be included in a UE.
  • the UE may for instance be a cellular phone, a wireless modem, a wireless communication device, a handheld device, a laptop computer, or the like.
  • the UE may also be an Internet of Things (loT) equipment, like a wireless camera, a smart sensor, a smart meter, smart glasses, a vehicle (manned or unmanned), a global positioning system device, etc., or any other equipment that may run applications that need to exchange data with remote recipients, via the wireless device.
  • LoT Internet of Things
  • the wireless device comprises one or more processors and one or more memories.
  • the one or more processors may include for instance a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), etc.
  • the one or more memories may include any type of computer readable volatile and non-volatile memories (magnetic hard disk, solid-state disk, optical disk, electronic memory, etc.).
  • the one or more memories may store a computer program product, in the form of a set of programcode instructions to be executed by the one or more processors to implement all or part of the steps of a method for exchanging data, performed at a UE’s side, according to any one of the embodiments disclosed herein.
  • the wireless device can comprise also a main radio, MR, unit.
  • the MR unit corresponds to a main wireless communication unit of the wireless device, used for exchanging data with BSs of the RAN using radio signals.
  • the MR unit may implement one or more wireless communication protocols, and may for instance be a 3G, 4G, 5G, NR, WiFi, WiMax, etc. transceiver or the like.
  • the MR unit corresponds to a 5G NR wireless communication unit.
  • AI/ML Model is a data driven algorithm that applies AI/ML techniques to generate set of outputs based on set of inputs.
  • AI/ML model delivery is a generic term referring to delivery of an AI/ML model from one entity to another entity in any manner.
  • An entity could mean network node/function (e.g., gNB, LMF, etc.), UE, proprietary server, etc.
  • AI/ML model Inference is a process of using trained AI/ML model to produce set of outputs based on set of inputs.
  • AI/ML model testing is a subprocess of training, to evaluate the performance of final AI/ML model using dataset different from one used for model training and validation. Differently from AI/ML model validation, testing does not assume subsequent tuning of the model.
  • AI/ML model training is a process to train an AI/ML Model [by learning the input/output relationship] in data driven manner and obtain the trained AI/ML Model for inference.
  • AI/ML model transfer is a delivery of an AI/ML model over the air interface in manner that is not transparent to 3GPP signalling, either parameters of model structure known at the receiving end or new model with parameters. Delivery may contain full model or partial model.
  • AI/ML model validation is a subprocess of training, to evaluate the quality of an AI/ML model using dataset different from one used for model training, that helps selecting model parameters that generalize beyond the dataset used for model training.
  • Data collection is a process of collecting data by the network nodes, management entity, or UE for the purpose of AI/ML model training, data analytics and inference.
  • Federated learning I federated training is a machine learning technique that trains an AI/ML model across multiple decentralized edge nodes e.g., UEs, gNBs each performing local model training using local data samples. The technique requires multiple interactions of the model, but no exchange of local data samples.
  • Functionality identification is a process/method of identifying an AI/ML functionality for the common understanding between the NW and the UE. Note is Information regarding the AI/ML functionality may be shared during functionality identification. Where AI/ML functionality resides depends on the specific use cases and sub use cases.
  • Model activation means enable an AI/ML model for specific AI/ML-enabled feature.
  • Model deactivation means disable an AI/ML model for specific AI/ML-enabled feature.
  • Model download means Model transfer from the network to UE.
  • Model identification is A process/method of identifying an AI/ML model for the common understanding between the NW and the UE.
  • the process/method of model identification may or may not be applicable and regarding the AI/ML model may be shared during model identification.
  • Model monitoring is a procedure that monitors the inference performance of the AI/ML model.
  • Model parameter update is Process of updating the model parameters of model.
  • Model selection is the process of selecting an AI/ML model for activation among multiple models for the same AI/ML enabled feature. Model selection may or may not be carried out simultaneously with model activation.
  • Model switching is deactivating currently active AI/ML model and activating different AI/ML model for specific AI/ML-enabled feature.
  • Model update is Process of updating the model parameters and/or model structure of model.
  • Model upload is Model transfer from UE to the network.
  • AI/ML Network-side
  • Offline field data is the data collected from field and used for offline training of the AI/ML model.
  • Offline training is an AI/ML training process where the model is trained based on collected dataset, and where the trained model is later used or delivered for inference. Note is This definition only serves as guidance. There may be cases that may not exactly conform to this definition but could still be categorized as offline training by commonly accepted conventions.
  • Online field data is the data collected from field and used for online training of the AI/ML model.
  • Online training is an AI/ML training process where the model being used for inference) is (typically continuously) trained in (near) real-time with the arrival of new training samples.
  • Note is the notion of (near) real-time vs. non real-time is context- dependent and is relative to the inference time-scale. This definition only serves as guidance.
  • Fine- tuning/re-training may be done via online or offline training. This note could be removed when we define the term fine-tuning.
  • Reinforcement Learning is a process of training an AI/ML model from input (a.k.a. state) and feedback signal (a.k.a. reward) resulting from the model’s output (a.k.a. action) in an environment the model is interacting with.
  • Semi-supervised learning is a process of training model with mix of labelled data and unlabelled data.
  • Supervised learning is a process of training model from input and its corresponding labels.
  • Two-sided (AI/ML) model is a paired AI/ML Model(s) over which joint inference is performed, where joint inference comprises AI/ML Inference whose inference is performed jointly across the UE and the network, i.e, the first part of inference is firstly performed by UE and then the remaining part is performed by gNB, or vice versa.
  • AI/ML UE-side
  • Unsupervised learning is a process of training model without labelled data.
  • Proprietary-format models is ML models of vendor-Zdevice-specific proprietary format, from 3GPP perspective. They are not mutually recognizable across vendors and hide model design information from other vendors when shared.
  • Open-format models is ML models of specified format that are mutually recognizable across vendors and allow interoperability, from 3GPP perspective. They are mutually recognizable between vendors and do not hide model design information from other vendors when shared.
  • AI/ML based techniques are currently applied to many different applications and 3GPP also started to work on its technical investigation to apply to multiple use cases based on the observed potential gains.
  • AI/ML lifecycle can be split into several stages such as data collection/pre- processing, model training, model testing/validation, model deployment/update, model monitoring etc., where each stage is equally important to achieve target performance with any specific model(s).
  • one of the challenging issues is to manage the lifecycle of AI/ML model. It is mainly because the data/model drift occurs during model deployment/inference and it results in performance degradation of AI/ML model.
  • model training or re-training is one of key issues for model performance maintenance as model performance such as inferencing and/or training is dependent on different model execution environment with varying configuration parameters.
  • AI/ML model needs model monitoring after deployment because model performance cannot be maintained continuously due to drift and update feedback is then provided to re-train/update the model or select alternative model.
  • AI/ML model enabled wireless communication network it is then important to consider how to handle AI/ML model in activation with re-configuration for wireless devices under operations such as model training, inference, updating, etc. Variation of UE ML condition and/or ML capability status makes model pairing or alignment difficult so that the overall model performance gets degraded.
  • a set of representative models are pre-configured to be associated with one or multiple variation models so that mapping relation between representative model and the related variation model(s) can be pre-determined.
  • One or more variation models for activation can be selected among candidate variation models associated with representative model. Both representative models and variation models in mapping relation information can be indicated using index or ID value.
  • a set of specific variation models can be determined based on the configured measurement technique such as similarity metric or K-means clustering. Depending on device ML condition or ML capability, any available variation model(s) associated with the specific representative model can be chosen for activation.
  • ML condition refers to the (non)real-time operational state of a ML model within a wireless communication system and it includes factors such as network load, dataset availability, device ML capability status, environmental conditions (e.g., site, signal interference), and/or device power constraints that may influence the selection and activation of a variation model.
  • ML capability refers to the processing capacity and efficiency of a device (e.g., UE or network-side entity) in handling ML operations and it includes factors such as available computing resources (CPU, GPU, or NPU), memory capacity, model execution speed, supported ML frameworks, and the ability to process different complexity levels of variation models.
  • Mapping relation information can be sent via system information or dedicated RRC signaling. Any additional changes or updates about mapping relation information can be also sent via L1/L2 or RRC signaling. Decision of specific variation model(s) can be made by either network side or UE side depending on implementation scenarios.
  • Representative model can be defined as one of available variation models, ensemble model of the aggregated variation models, or any derived model achieving the average performance across the associated variation models.
  • mapping relation tables can be configured and applied to ML operation between network side and UE side.
  • different variation models can have different complexity levels with inferencing performance difference.
  • UE can select either representative model itself or any variation model(s) available at UE.
  • Figure 1 shows an exemplary table of mapping relation between representative models and variation models.
  • a set of representative models are preconfigured to be associated with one or multiple variation models so that mapping relation between representative model and the related variation model(s) can be predetermined.
  • One or more variation models for activation can be selected among candidate variation models associated with representative model.
  • Both representative models and variation models in mapping relation information can be indicated using index or ID value.
  • Figure 2 shows an exemplary block diagram of relationship structure of representative model and variation models.
  • representative model can be defined as one of available variation models, ensemble model of the aggregated variation models, or any derived model achieving the average performance across the associated variation models. Multiple variation models can be chosen and activated if applicable depending on different use cases. With a given representative model, different variation models can have different complexity levels with inferencing performance difference.
  • UE can select either representative model itself or any variation model(s) available at UE.
  • Figure 3 shows an exemplary flow chart of configuring representative models and variation models at network side.
  • a set of representative models are pre-configured to be associated with one or multiple variation models by network side.
  • any available variation model(s) associated with the specific representative model can be chosen for activation.
  • Mapping relation information can be sent via system information or dedicated RRC signaling. Any additional changes or updates about mapping relation information can be also sent via L1/L2 or RRC signaling.
  • Figure 4 shows an exemplary flow chart of activating variation model(s) at UE side.
  • multiple variation models can be chosen and activated if applicable depending on different use cases.
  • One or more mapping relation tables can be configured and applied to ML operation between network side and UE side.
  • different variation models can have different complexity levels with inferencing performance difference.
  • UE can select either representative model itself or any variation model(s) available at UE.
  • Figure 5 shows an exemplary signaling flow of UE's autonomous decision for variation model(s) for activation.
  • multiple variation models can be chosen and activated if applicable depending on different use cases.
  • UE can select either representative model itself or any variation model(s) available at UE.
  • any activation and/or decision of selecting variation models can be performed by network side depending on implementation scenarios.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne des procédés d'utilisation de la représentation de modèle faisant appel à l'IA/AA (intelligence artificielle/apprentissage automatique) pré-configurée dans un système de communication mobile sans fil comprenant une station de base (p. ex. gNB, TN, NTN) et une station mobile (p. ex. UE). L'application d'un modèle d'IA/AA à un réseau d'accès radio peut donner lieu à une variation dynamique des conditions d'AA puis à une dégradation des performances du modèle. Par conséquent, une opération sur un modèle (par exemple, l'entraînement/l'inférence/la surveillance/la mise à jour d'un modèle) peut être réalisée entre un réseau et un UE par configuration d'un modèle représentatif et des modèles de variation associés.
PCT/EP2025/057189 2024-03-22 2025-03-17 Procédé de signalisation d'ajustement de modèle à l'aide d'un modèle représentatif Pending WO2025195960A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102024108222 2024-03-22
DE102024108222.4 2024-03-22

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2025195960A1 true WO2025195960A1 (fr) 2025-09-25

Family

ID=95066090

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2025/057189 Pending WO2025195960A1 (fr) 2024-03-22 2025-03-17 Procédé de signalisation d'ajustement de modèle à l'aide d'un modèle représentatif

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2025195960A1 (fr)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190012876A1 (en) 2017-07-08 2019-01-10 Gaming Analytics Inc Machine-learning platform for operational decision making
US20190332895A1 (en) 2018-04-30 2019-10-31 International Business Machines Corporation Optimizing machine learning-based, edge computing networks
US20210019612A1 (en) 2019-07-15 2021-01-21 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Self-healing machine learning system for transformed data
EP4075348A1 (fr) 2021-04-14 2022-10-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Contrôle de qualité d'un modèle d'apprentissage machine
US20230022737A1 (en) 2021-07-21 2023-01-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Generation support apparatus, generation support method, and generation support program
US20230069342A1 (en) 2021-08-27 2023-03-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Computer system and method of determining model switch timing

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190012876A1 (en) 2017-07-08 2019-01-10 Gaming Analytics Inc Machine-learning platform for operational decision making
US20190332895A1 (en) 2018-04-30 2019-10-31 International Business Machines Corporation Optimizing machine learning-based, edge computing networks
US20210019612A1 (en) 2019-07-15 2021-01-21 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Self-healing machine learning system for transformed data
EP4075348A1 (fr) 2021-04-14 2022-10-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Contrôle de qualité d'un modèle d'apprentissage machine
US20230022737A1 (en) 2021-07-21 2023-01-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Generation support apparatus, generation support method, and generation support program
US20230069342A1 (en) 2021-08-27 2023-03-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Computer system and method of determining model switch timing

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) for NR air interface (Release 18)", no. V18.0.0, 16 January 2024 (2024-01-16), pages 1 - 187, XP052576826, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://ftp.3gpp.org/Specs/archive/38_series/38.843/38843-i00.zip 38843-i00.docx> [retrieved on 20240116] *
VIVO: "General discussions on AI/ML framework", vol. RAN WG1, no. e-Meeting; 20220509 - 20220520, 29 April 2022 (2022-04-29), XP052153024, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://ftp.3gpp.org/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_109-e/Docs/R1-2203549.zip R1-2203549 General discussions on AIML framework.docx> [retrieved on 20220429] *
XUEMING PAN ET AL: "Discussions on AI/ML framework", vol. RAN WG1, no. Xiamen, CN; 20231009 - 20231013, 28 September 2023 (2023-09-28), XP052526814, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_114b/Docs/R1-2309093.zip R1-2309093 Discussions on AIML framework.docx> [retrieved on 20230928] *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2025008304A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation avancée de rapport ml
WO2024208702A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;ensemble de données de modèle pour réseau d&#39;accès radioélectrique
WO2025195960A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;ajustement de modèle à l&#39;aide d&#39;un modèle représentatif
WO2025168468A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation aa avancée pour ran
WO2025233227A1 (fr) Signalisation de modèle adaptatif avec l&#39;ensemble de données associé pour ran
WO2025195957A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;activation de modèle avancée
WO2025168467A1 (fr) Procédé d&#39;appariement de conditions ml
WO2025233225A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;adaptation d&#39;identification de modèle
WO2025168462A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;entraînement en ligne avancée pour ran
WO2025195952A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement de modèle adaptatif à perception d&#39;état de dispositif
WO2025196092A1 (fr) Procédé de configuration de l&#39;appariement de modèles multi-côtés avec l&#39;opération de modèle ml de bout en bout à travers différentes entités
WO2025233201A1 (fr) Procédé de configuration de hiérarchisation de modèles
WO2025233207A1 (fr) Signalisation de rétroaction de mesure de modèle
WO2025168463A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation de mise à jour de modèle avancée pour un ran
WO2025233228A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation de concaténation basée sur des cellules multiples
WO2025233278A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation de pré-activation multi-modèle
WO2025168471A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;entraînement en ligne basée sur un état rrc
WO2025195815A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;attribution de modèle ia/aa avancée
WO2025172265A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation de modèle basée sur des conditions avancées
EP4566003A1 (fr) Modèles spécifiques d&#39;une tâche pour réseaux sans fil
WO2025168469A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;alignement de modèle
WO2025210139A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;adaptation de mode d&#39;entraînement
WO2025210138A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation d&#39;opération de modèle multi-entraînement
WO2025233348A1 (fr) Procédé de signalisation de modèle basé sur une pré-correspondance
WO2025195792A1 (fr) Procédé de configuration d&#39;un ensemble de modes de fonctionnement pris en charge pour une fonctionnalité aa dans un système de communication sans fil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 25713539

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1