[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2025166752A1 - Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau - Google Patents

Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau

Info

Publication number
WO2025166752A1
WO2025166752A1 PCT/CN2024/077007 CN2024077007W WO2025166752A1 WO 2025166752 A1 WO2025166752 A1 WO 2025166752A1 CN 2024077007 W CN2024077007 W CN 2024077007W WO 2025166752 A1 WO2025166752 A1 WO 2025166752A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
information
terminal device
beams
threshold
beam set
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
PCT/CN2024/077007
Other languages
English (en)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
范江胜
伍浩
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Original Assignee
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd filed Critical Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Priority to PCT/CN2024/077007 priority Critical patent/WO2025166752A1/fr
Publication of WO2025166752A1 publication Critical patent/WO2025166752A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/08—Testing, supervising or monitoring using real traffic

Definitions

  • the present application relates to the field of communication technology, and more specifically, to a wireless communication method, terminal equipment, and network equipment.
  • AI artificial intelligence
  • the present application provides a wireless communication method, terminal device, and network device.
  • the following introduces various aspects of the present application.
  • a wireless communication method including: a terminal device sends first information to a network device, the first information including a performance monitoring result for a first model, the first model being used to predict a beam measurement result, wherein the first information includes any one of the following information: one or more first indication information, one first indication information among the one or more first indication information being used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid; second indication information, the second indication information being used to indicate first proportion information or to indicate a proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs, the first proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions; information used to calculate the second proportion information, the second proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions.
  • a wireless communication method including: a network device receives first information sent by a terminal device, the first information including performance monitoring results for a first model, the first model being used to predict beam measurement results, wherein the first information includes any one of the following information: one or more first indication information, one first indication information among the one or more first indication information being used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid; second indication information, the second indication information being used to indicate first proportion information or to indicate the proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs, the first proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions; information used to calculate the second proportion information, the second proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions.
  • a terminal device including: a sending unit for sending first information to a network device, the first information including a performance monitoring result for a first model, the first model being used to predict a beam measurement result, wherein the first information includes any one of the following information: one or more first indication information, one first indication information among the one or more first indication information being used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid; second indication information, the second indication information being used to indicate first proportion information or to indicate a proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs, the first proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions; information for calculating the second proportion information, the second proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions.
  • a network device including: a receiving unit for receiving first information sent by a terminal device, the first information including performance monitoring results for a first model, the first model being used to predict beam measurement results, wherein the first information includes any one of the following information: one or more first indication information, one first indication information among the one or more first indication information being used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid; second indication information, the second indication information being used to indicate first proportion information or to indicate the proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs, the first proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total prediction times, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total prediction times; information for calculating the second proportion information, the second proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total prediction times, or the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total prediction times.
  • a terminal device comprising a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, wherein the memory is used to store one or more computer programs, and the processor is used to call the computer program in the memory so that the terminal device executes part or all of the steps in the method of the first aspect.
  • a network device comprising a processor, a memory, and a transceiver, wherein the memory is used to store one or more computer programs, and the processor is used to call the computer program in the memory so that the network device executes part or all of the steps in the method of the second aspect.
  • a computer program product comprising a program, wherein the program enables a computer to execute the method as described in the first aspect or the second aspect.
  • a computer program is provided, wherein the computer program enables a computer to execute the method as described in the first aspect or the second aspect.
  • FIG1 is a system architecture diagram of a wireless communication system to which an embodiment of the present application may be applied.
  • FIG2 is a flow chart of a wireless communication method according to an embodiment of the present application.
  • FIG4 is a schematic diagram of the structure of a network device provided in an embodiment of the present application.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless communication system 100 used in an embodiment of the present application.
  • the wireless communication system 100 may include a network device 110 and a terminal device 120.
  • the network device 110 may be a device that communicates with the terminal device 120.
  • the network device 110 may provide communication coverage for a specific geographic area and may communicate with the terminal device 120 within the coverage area.
  • FIG1 exemplarily shows a network device and two terminals.
  • the wireless communication system 100 may include multiple network devices and each network device may include other numbers of terminal devices within its coverage area, which is not limited in the embodiments of the present application.
  • the wireless communication system 100 may further include other network entities such as a network controller and a mobility management entity, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present application.
  • network entities such as a network controller and a mobility management entity, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present application.
  • the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application can be applied to various communication systems, such as: fifth-generation (5G) systems or new radio (NR), long-term evolution (LTE) systems, LTE frequency division duplex (FDD) systems, LTE time division duplex (TDD) systems, etc.
  • 5G fifth-generation
  • LTE long-term evolution
  • FDD frequency division duplex
  • TDD time division duplex
  • the technical solutions provided by the present application can also be applied to future communication systems, such as sixth-generation mobile communication systems, satellite communication systems, etc.
  • the terminal devices in the embodiments of the present application may also be referred to as terminal devices, access terminals, user units, user stations, mobile stations, mobile stations (MS), mobile terminals (MT), remote stations, remote terminals, mobile devices, user terminals, terminals, wireless communication devices, user agents, or user devices.
  • the terminal devices in the embodiments of the present application may refer to devices that provide voice and/or data connectivity to users and can be used to connect people, objects, and machines, such as handheld devices and vehicle-mounted devices with wireless connectivity.
  • the terminal devices in the embodiments of the present application may be mobile phones, tablets, laptops, PDAs, mobile internet devices (MIDs), wearable devices, virtual reality (VR) devices, augmented reality (AR) devices, wireless terminals used in industrial control, wireless terminals used in self-driving, wireless terminals used in remote medical surgery, wireless terminals used in smart grids, wireless terminals used in transportation safety, wireless terminals used in smart cities, wireless terminals used in smart homes, and the like.
  • the terminal devices may be used to act as base stations.
  • the terminal devices may act as dispatching entities, providing sidelink signals between terminal devices in V2X or D2D systems.
  • a cell phone and a car communicate with each other using sidelink signals.
  • Cell phones and smart home devices can communicate without relaying communication signals through a base station.
  • the network device in the embodiment of the present application may be a device for communicating with a terminal device, and the network device may also be referred to as an access network device or a wireless access network device, such as a base station.
  • the network device in the embodiment of the present application may refer to a radio access network (RAN) node (or device) that connects a terminal device to a wireless network.
  • RAN radio access network
  • the base station may broadly cover various names as follows, or be replaced with the following names, such as: Node B (NodeB), evolved NodeB (eNB), next generation NodeB (gNB), relay station, access point, transmission point (TRP), transmitting point (TP), master station MeNB, secondary station SeNB, multi-standard radio (MSR) node, home base station, Network controller, access node, wireless node, access point (AP), transmission node, transceiver node, baseband unit (BBU), remote radio unit (RRU), active antenna unit (AAU), remote radio head (RRH), central unit (CU), distributed unit (DU), positioning node, etc.
  • a base station can be a macro base station, a micro base station, a relay node, a donor node, or the like, or a combination thereof.
  • the air interface (Uu interface) system is an important component of the wireless communication system.
  • the air interface (Uu interface) system is an important component of the wireless communication system.
  • the industry has begun to study the application of AI models in air interface systems (such as 5G/6G air interface systems). The study believes that for certain functions (functionality) of the air interface, the processing solution based on the AI model (referred to as the AI processing solution) may achieve certain performance gains compared with the traditional processing solution (i.e., the non-AI processing solution).
  • AI models do not always work well. For example, due to changes in environmental, configuration and other factors, the operating performance of AI models may decline significantly. To address this issue, it is necessary to introduce a model monitoring process, which is mainly used to monitor whether the model can work well and assist decision-makers (such as network equipment) to promptly judge the operation status of the model, so as to make timely management decisions based on the model monitoring results.
  • the AI model can also be replaced by an AI function, and the two can be used interchangeably if there is no conflict.
  • an embodiment of the present application provides a wireless communication method that uses a first model to predict beam measurement results, and a terminal device sends the performance monitoring results to a network device, and specifically defines a method for sending the performance monitoring results.
  • a wireless communication method that uses a first model to predict beam measurement results, and a terminal device sends the performance monitoring results to a network device, and specifically defines a method for sending the performance monitoring results.
  • FIG2 is a flow chart of a wireless communication method according to an embodiment of the present application.
  • the method of FIG2 can be performed by a terminal device and a network device.
  • the terminal device can be, for example, the terminal device 120 mentioned above, and the network device can be, for example, the network device 110 mentioned above.
  • the terminal device sends first information to the network device, where the first information includes a performance monitoring result for the first model.
  • the first model mentioned here can be any model for predicting beam measurement results.
  • the first model can be an AI model or an ML model.
  • the first information can also be referred to as (model) performance monitoring result information or (model) performance monitoring report.
  • the terminal device can obtain the performance monitoring results by monitoring the operation process of the first model.
  • the terminal device can obtain the performance monitoring results by monitoring the operation process of the first function (the function of the first model).
  • the first function can be an AI function or an ML function.
  • one or more cells include a service cell (or one or more cells only include a service cell), and the first information only includes the performance monitoring results associated with the service cell. If one or more cells include a service cell, the terminal device may only predict the beam measurement results for the beam of the service cell, without predicting the beam measurement results for the beam of the neighboring cell. Alternatively, if one or more cells include a service cell, the terminal device may predict the beam measurement results for both the beam of the service cell and the beam of the neighboring cell. In this case, although the terminal device predicts the beam measurement results for the beam of the neighboring cell, the terminal device only sends the performance monitoring results associated with the service cell to the network device.
  • the terminal device performs beam measurement result prediction on both the service cell and the neighboring cell, but the protocol stipulates that the performance monitoring process only needs to monitor the service cell. Therefore, the performance monitoring results reported by the terminal only include the performance monitoring results associated with the service cell. Since there is no need to report the performance monitoring results associated with the neighboring cell, signaling overhead can be saved.
  • one or more cells include neighboring cells (or one or more cells only include neighboring cells), and the first information only includes performance monitoring results associated with neighboring cells. If one or more cells include neighboring cells, the terminal device can only predict the beam measurement results of the neighboring cells, but not the beam measurement results of the serving cell. Alternatively, if one or more cells include neighboring cells, the terminal device can predict the beam measurement results of both the serving cell and the neighboring cell. In this case, although the terminal device predicts the beam measurement results of the serving cell, the terminal device only sends the performance monitoring results associated with the neighboring cells to the network device.
  • the terminal device performs beam measurement result prediction on both the serving cell and the neighboring cell, but the protocol stipulates that the performance monitoring process only needs to monitor the neighboring cells. Therefore, the performance monitoring results reported by the terminal only include the performance monitoring results associated with the neighboring cells. Since there is no need to report the performance monitoring results associated with the serving cell, signaling overhead can be saved.
  • the embodiment of the present application does not specifically limit the content of the first information.
  • the first information may include any of the following information: one or more first indication information, second indication information, and information used to calculate the second ratio information.
  • the content of the first information is described in detail below.
  • the first information may include one or more first indication information, and one of the one or more first indication information is used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid. It can be understood that for each prediction behavior of the first model, a first indication information will be associated to indicate whether the prediction result is valid.
  • the behavior of the terminal device using the first model to predict the beam measurement result is called a prediction behavior.
  • This application does not specifically limit the content of the first indication information, as long as it can indicate the validity of a prediction result.
  • the first indication information can be represented by bits to indicate the validity of the prediction behavior.
  • each prediction action is associated with a corresponding bit, used to indicate whether the prediction result obtained from that prediction action is valid.
  • N bits can be used to indicate the validity of N prediction results, with each bit being associated with each of the N prediction results. The value of a bit is used to indicate whether the prediction result associated with that bit is valid.
  • a bit may take the value of "0” or "1".
  • “1” may be used to indicate that the prediction result is valid, and "0” may be used to indicate that the prediction result is invalid.
  • "0” may be used to indicate that the prediction result is valid, and "1” may be used to indicate that the prediction result is invalid. This application does not make any specific limitations on this.
  • the first information includes three pieces of first indication information, each of which is represented by three bits to indicate the validity of three prediction results. If the value of these three bits is "101," and these three bits correspond to prediction result 1, prediction result 2, and prediction result 3, respectively, and assuming that "1" indicates that the prediction result is valid and "0” indicates that the prediction result is invalid, then "101" indicates that prediction result 1 is valid, prediction result 2 is invalid, and prediction result 3 is valid. If “1” indicates that the prediction result is invalid and "0” indicates that the prediction result is valid, then "101” indicates that prediction result 1 is invalid, prediction result 2 is valid, and prediction result 3 is invalid.
  • This application does not specifically limit the order in which bits are associated with prediction results.
  • the order in which bits are associated with prediction results can be determined based on the chronological order in which they occur. For example, still taking the value of the three bits as "101" as an example, for prediction result 1, prediction result 2, and prediction result 3, the order determined by the terminal device is: prediction result 1 ⁇ prediction result 2 ⁇ prediction result 3, or prediction result 3 ⁇ prediction result 2 ⁇ prediction result 1.
  • the order in which bits are associated with prediction results can be determined based on the validity of the prediction results. For example, the first few bits in the bit list are used to indicate a valid prediction result, and the last few bits are used to indicate an invalid prediction result. For another example, the first few bits in the bit list are used to indicate an invalid prediction result, and the last few bits are used to indicate a valid prediction result.
  • the validity of a prediction result may be determined each time a predicted beam measurement result is obtained and an actual beam measurement result corresponding to the predicted beam is obtained.
  • the validity of the prediction result may be determined after multiple predicted beam measurement results and actual beam measurement results corresponding to the multiple predicted beams are obtained.
  • a terminal device may determine the validity of each prediction result after obtaining n predicted beam measurement results and actual beam measurement results corresponding to the n predicted beams, where n is a positive integer.
  • the first information may include second indication information.
  • the second indication information may be used to indicate the first proportion information or to indicate the proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs.
  • the first proportion information may include the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions (hereinafter referred to as the effective rate of the prediction results), or the first proportion information may include the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions (hereinafter referred to as the ineffective rate of the prediction results).
  • the second indication information can directly indicate the first ratio information, so that the network device can directly obtain the first ratio information, thereby determining the effectiveness or inefficiency of the prediction result before the terminal device sends the first information.
  • This indication method is relatively simple.
  • the second indication information may be used to indicate the scale interval to which the first scale information belongs. If the second indication information can be used to indicate the scale interval to which the first scale information belongs, the terminal device may determine a first association relationship, the first association relationship including a correspondence between values of the second indication information and the scale interval, and determine the scale interval to which the first scale information belongs based on the first association relationship. In other words, the terminal device may determine the second indication information based on the first association relationship.
  • a value of the second indication information can correspond to a proportional interval, or in other words, the value of the second indication information and the proportional interval have a one-to-one correspondence.
  • the terminal device can determine the value of the second indication information based on the proportional interval to which the first proportional information belongs.
  • the value of the second indication information can be: “00", “01”, “10”, “11”, and the proportion intervals can include: 0-25%, 25%-50%, 50%-75%, 75%-100%.
  • the first association relationship can be expressed as follows: the value “00” is associated with the interval 0-25%, the value "01” is associated with the interval 25%-50%, the value "10” is associated with the interval 50%-75%, and the value "11” is associated with the interval 75% to 100% association. If the value of the second indication information is "00", it means that before the first information is sent, the effectiveness or inefficiency of the prediction result is in the range of 0% to 25%.
  • the value of the second indication information is "01", it means that before the first information is sent, the effectiveness or inefficiency of the prediction result is in the range of 25% to 50%; if the value of the second indication information is "10”, it means that before the first information is sent, the effectiveness or inefficiency of the prediction result is in the range of 50% to 75%; if the value of the second indication information is "11”, it means that before the first information is sent, the effectiveness or inefficiency of the prediction result is in the range of 75% to 100%.
  • the first association described above is merely an example, and the embodiments of the present application are not limited thereto.
  • the value “00” is associated with the interval 75% to 100%
  • the value "01” is associated with the interval 50% to 75%
  • the value "10” is associated with the interval 25% to 50%
  • the value "11” is associated with the interval 0% to 25%.
  • the first information may include information used to calculate second ratio information, where the second ratio information includes the ratio of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or the ratio of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions, wherein the information used to calculate the second ratio information includes the number of valid prediction results and the number of invalid prediction results; or the number of valid prediction results and the total number of predictions; or the number of invalid prediction results and the total number of predictions. If the second ratio information includes the ratio of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, then the information used to calculate the second ratio information includes the number of valid prediction results and the number of invalid prediction results; or the number of valid prediction results and the total number of predictions.
  • the information used to calculate the second ratio information includes the number of valid prediction results and the number of invalid prediction results; or the number of invalid prediction results and the total number of predictions.
  • Including the information used to calculate the second ratio information in the first information is simpler than directly reporting the second ratio information because the possible decimal places in the second ratio information do not need to be quantized. It is also more accurate than reporting the ratio interval to which the second ratio information belongs, because reporting the ratio interval method itself has systematic errors.
  • the first information includes performance monitoring results of beam prediction results for one or more cells
  • the first information also includes cell identification information of one or more cells, and the cell identification information is represented by frequency and physical cell identifier (PCI) information or by serving cell index or by cell global identity (CGI) information.
  • PCI physical cell identifier
  • CGI cell global identity
  • the validity of the prediction result may be related to one or more of the following information: the predicted beam measurement result; the actual beam measurement result; the beam order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result; the beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result; the beam order determined based on the actual beam measurement result; and the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • the following examples illustrate the above situations.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to a beam order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result, or in other words, the validity of the prediction result can be determined based on the beam order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result.
  • the beam order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result can include determining the beam order in descending order of the predicted beam measurement result, or determining the beam order in descending order of the predicted beam measurement result.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to the beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results and the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the validity of the prediction result can be determined based on the beam set determined by the predicted beam measurement result and the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • the beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result may include determining the beam set after screening according to the predicted beam measurement result from high to low, or determining the beam set after screening according to the predicted beam measurement result from low to high; the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result may include determining the beam set after screening according to the actual beam measurement result from high to low, or determining the beam set after screening according to the actual beam measurement result from low to high.
  • the beam ranking determined based on the predicted beam measurement result may include ranking the beams from high to low according to the predicted beam measurement result, determining the beam ranking, or ranking the beams from low to high according to the predicted beam measurement result, determining the beam ranking;
  • the beam ranking determined based on the actual beam measurement result may include ranking the beams from high to low according to the actual beam measurement result, determining the beam ranking, or ranking the beams from low to high according to the actual beam measurement result, determining the beam ranking.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to a beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result.
  • the validity of the prediction result can be determined based on the beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result.
  • determining the beam set based on the predicted beam measurement result can include determining the beam set by filtering the predicted beam measurement results from high to low, or by filtering the predicted beam measurement results from low to high.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to a beam order determined based on actual beam measurement results.
  • the validity of the prediction result can be determined based on the beam order determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the beam order determined based on the actual beam measurement results can include a beam order determined in descending order of the actual beam measurement results, or a beam order determined in descending order of the actual beam measurement results.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • the validity of the prediction result can be determined based on the beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • determining the beam set based on the actual beam measurement result can include determining the beam set by filtering the beams from high to low based on the actual beam measurement result, or by filtering the beams from low to high based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • Example 1 How to determine if a prediction result is valid
  • the terminal device determines that the prediction result is valid when a first condition is met.
  • the first condition includes one or more of the following eight conditions. Each of the eight conditions is described below.
  • Condition 1 an absolute value of a difference between a predicted beam measurement result corresponding to a beam in the first beam set and an actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to a first threshold.
  • Condition 2 The absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams to the number of beams included in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold.
  • Condition 3 The beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is the same as the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • Condition 7 The beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result belongs to the second beam set.
  • Condition 8 The beam in the second beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result belongs to the first beam set.
  • the first beam set may include the top K beams with the best beam measurement results determined based on the predicted beam measurement results
  • the second beam set may include the top K beams with the best beam measurement results determined based on the actual beam measurement results, where K is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
  • the beam measurement result may also be referred to as beam quality.
  • Beam quality may be Measured by physical layer indicators.
  • the beam measurement result can be determined based on one or more of the following: reference signal receiving power (RSRP), signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR), reference signal receiving quality (RSRQ), received signal strength indicator (RSSI), and signal to noise ratio (SNR).
  • the value of K may be agreed upon by default, or predefined in the protocol (such as a predefined fixed value), or configured by the network device.
  • the value of K may be 1, 2, or 3 as agreed upon by the protocol.
  • Configuring K by protocol agreement is simpler to implement and saves signaling overhead because it does not need to be configured to the terminal device through dedicated signaling.
  • the value of K may be configured to the terminal device by the network device.
  • the terminal device may receive configuration information sent by the network device, which is used to indicate the value of K. This approach is more flexible.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1, and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 (the period of predicting the beam measurement results of beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 can be shorter than the period of actually measuring the beam measurement results of beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device predicts the beam measurement results of beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 once every 40m, but actually measures the beam measurement results of cell 1 once every 160m.
  • the terminal device obtains through an actual measurement process that the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4 and beam 6 associated with cell 1 are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the second beam set), and obtains through a prediction process that the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4 and beam 6 associated with cell 1 are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the first beam set).
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, or in other words, for the same beam in the first beam set, the absolute value of the difference between the corresponding predicted beam measurement and the actual beam measurement result is less than or equal to the first threshold.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result and the actual beam measurement result is less than or equal to the first threshold, indicating that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate, and therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the same beam mentioned above can be any beam in the first beam set.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result and the actual beam measurement result being less than or equal to the first threshold can be referred to as accuracy compliance.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the network device configures a terminal device to actually measure Beam 1, Beam 3, and Beam 5 associated with Cell 1, and to predict Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1 and actually measure Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1.
  • the measurement results corresponding to Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1 obtained by the terminal device through the actual measurement process are -97 dBm, -98 dBm, and -99 dBm, respectively.
  • the measurement results corresponding to Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1 obtained through the prediction process are -99 dBm, -102 dBm, and -100 dBm, respectively.
  • the value of K is 2, and the value of the first threshold is 3 dB.
  • the two best beams predicted this time are beam 2 and beam 6, that is, the first beam set includes beam 2 and beam 6.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (less than the first threshold), and the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 6 is equal to 1dB (less than the first threshold). Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the value of the first threshold may be agreed upon by default, or predefined in the protocol (such as a predefined fixed value), or configured by the network device.
  • the value of the first threshold agreed upon by the protocol may be 1dB, 2dB, or 3dB. Configuring the first threshold by means of protocol agreement is simpler to implement and can also save signaling overhead because it does not need to be configured to the terminal device through dedicated signaling.
  • the value of the first threshold may be configured to the terminal device by the network device. The terminal device can receive configuration information sent by the network device, and the configuration information is used to indicate the value of the first threshold. This approach is more flexible.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold, indicating that the predicted beam
  • the number of beams whose measurement results are close to the actual beam measurement results is sufficient to roughly reflect that the predicted beam measurement results are relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the same beam mentioned above can be any beam in the first beam set.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to it and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold number of beams, and the ratio of the difference to the number of beams included in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold. It can be said that the beam measurement results corresponding to a certain proportion of beams meet the accuracy standard.
  • the first beam set includes beam 2 and beam 6
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to beam 2 and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to beam 2 is less than or equal to the first threshold
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to beam 6 and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to beam 6 is greater than the first threshold
  • the second threshold is 50%. Since the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to one of the two best beams and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, the 50% ratio requirement can be met, and the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to actually measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains measurement results corresponding to beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 through the actual measurement process as -97dBm, -98dBm, and -99dBm, respectively.
  • the measurement results corresponding to beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 obtained through the prediction process are -99dBm, -102dBm, and -100dBm, respectively.
  • the value of K is 3, and the value of the first threshold is 3dB. It can be seen that this The top three best beams in this prediction are beam 2, beam 6, and beam 4.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (less than the first threshold value)
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 6 is equal to 1dB (less than the first threshold value)
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 4 is equal to 4dB (greater than the first threshold value).
  • the second threshold value is 50%, since the beam measurement result prediction results corresponding to two of the three best beams meet the prediction conditions, the 50% ratio requirement can be reached. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • condition 2 By determining the validity of the prediction results through condition 2, it is possible to ensure that the first model is in a high-precision working state.
  • the performance monitoring requirements can be relatively relaxed, thereby avoiding the blind deactivation of the AI functions currently in use by network devices due to overly strict performance monitoring methods, thereby taking into account the reliability and flexibility of the wireless communication system.
  • the value of the second threshold may be agreed upon by default, or predefined in the protocol (such as a predefined fixed value), or configured by the network device.
  • the value of the second threshold agreed upon by the protocol may be 50%, 75%, or 90%.
  • the value of the second threshold may be configured to the terminal device by the network device. The terminal device can receive configuration information sent by the network device, and the configuration information is used to indicate the value of the second threshold. This approach is relatively flexible.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set.
  • any beam in the first beam set exists in the second beam set, and correspondingly, any beam in the second beam set also exists in the first beam set.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set, which means that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set, which can be said to be the beam identifications contained in the beam set meeting the standards.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the value of K is 2.
  • the terminal device obtains through the actual measurement process that the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the second beam set).
  • the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 obtained through the prediction process are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the first beam set). Since the first beam set and the second beam set are the same, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • condition 3 By determining the validity of the prediction results through condition 3, it is possible to ensure that accurate beam set information consisting of the top K best beams is obtained from the predictable beams, which is conducive to the network equipment correctly executing resource scheduling operations related to the beam set consisting of the top K best beams (for example: beam management scheduling, configuration of non-competition-based random access resources), thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • resource scheduling operations related to the beam set consisting of the top K best beams for example: beam management scheduling, configuration of non-competition-based random access resources
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result, indicating that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the same beam mentioned above can be any beam in the first beam set.
  • the arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is the same as the arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result, which can be called the relative ranking of the beams meeting the standard.
  • the embodiments of the present application do not specifically limit the order in which the beams in the first beam set are arranged based on the predicted beam measurement results and the order in which the beams in the first beam set are arranged based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the order in which the beams are arranged based on the predicted beam measurement results may include an order in which the beams are determined in descending order according to the predicted beam measurement results, or an order in which the beams are determined in descending order according to the predicted beam measurement results.
  • the order in which the beams are arranged based on the actual beam measurement results may also include an order in which the beams are determined in descending order according to the actual beam measurement results, or an order in which the beams are determined in descending order according to the actual beam measurement results.
  • both the beam sorting based on the predicted beam measurement results and the beam sorting based on the actual beam measurement results determine the beam order in descending order according to the beam measurement results.
  • the terminal device determines that the prediction result is valid.
  • the beam order of the K beams with the best prediction results after being ranked in descending order according to the beam measurement results is consistent with the relative order of the K beams with the best prediction results after being ranked in descending order based on the actual beam measurement results, which is conducive to the network equipment accurately executing resource scheduling operations related to the relative ranking of the beams, thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results, or in other words, for the same beam in the first beam set and the second beam set (the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set), the corresponding beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the corresponding beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results, indicating that the predicted beam measurement results are close to the actual beam measurement results, that is, the predicted beam measurement results are relatively accurate.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the same beam mentioned above can be any beam in the first beam set or any beam in the second beam set.
  • the corresponding beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results, which can be called the absolute ranking of the beams.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • condition 5 By determining the validity of the prediction results using condition 5, it is possible to ensure that the predicted beam ordering of the best K beams is consistent with the actual beam ordering based on the actual beam measurement results, thereby obtaining the correct absolute beam ranking. This helps network devices accurately execute resource scheduling operations related to beam ranking, thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • condition 5 can be combined with other conditions to determine whether the prediction result is valid.
  • condition 5 can be combined with condition 3
  • condition 5 can be combined with conditions 1 and 3
  • condition 5 can be combined with conditions 2 and 3.
  • the judgment condition is: the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set, and the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results, or in other words, the beam identifiers included in the first beam set and the second beam set meet the standards and the absolute rankings of the beams meet the standards.
  • This implementation method indicates that the predicted beam measurement results are consistent with the actual beam measurement results. The predicted beam measurement results are similar, that is, the predicted beam measurement results are relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction results are valid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to actually measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the value of K is 2.
  • the terminal device obtains through the actual measurement process that the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the second beam set), and obtains through the prediction process that the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the first beam set).
  • the order of the beams in the first beam set, determined based on the predicted beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the order of the beams in the second beam set, determined based on the actual beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the first and second beam sets contain the same beams and are arranged in the same order. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the judgment condition is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set, and the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results for the beams in the first beam set is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results for the beams in the second beam set, or in other words, the beam measurement results corresponding to all beams in the first beam set meet the accuracy standard, and the beam identifiers included in the beam set meet the standard, and the absolute ranking of the beams meets the standard.
  • This implementation method indicates that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate, so the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the ratio of the number of beams included in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams included in the second beam set is greater than or equal to a third threshold.
  • a certain proportion of beam identifiers (IDs) in the first beam set meet the threshold.
  • the configuration of the third threshold can also make the performance monitoring requirements relatively relaxed, thereby avoiding the network equipment blindly deactivating the AI functions in use due to overly strict performance monitoring methods, thereby taking into account the reliability and flexibility of the wireless communication system.
  • the judgment condition after combining condition 2 and condition 6 is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams contained in the second beam set is greater than or equal to the third threshold, or in other words, the beam measurement results corresponding to some beams contained in the first beam set meet the standards, and a certain proportion of beam identifiers meet the standards, indicating that the predicted beam measurement results are close to the actual beam measurement results, that is, the predicted beam measurement results are relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction results are valid.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains -99dBm, -100dBm, and -102dBm for Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 associated with Cell 1, respectively, through the actual measurement process.
  • K is set to 2.
  • the ranking of the beam sets associated with Cell 1 obtained through the prediction process shows that the two best predicted beams are Beam 2 and Beam 6, respectively.
  • the first beam set includes Beam 2 and Beam 6.
  • the terminal device obtains the best beam measurement results for beams 2 and 4 among beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1 through actual measurement. (Beams 2 and 4 now form the second beam set.)
  • the beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result, determined based on the predicted beam measurement results, is beam 2, which belongs to the second beam set. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that this prediction result is valid.
  • condition 1 and condition 4 determines that: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the beam in the first beam set is based on the predicted beam measurement result.
  • the beam arrangement order determined by the predicted beam measurement results is the same as the beam arrangement order determined for the beams in the first beam set based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the beam measurement results corresponding to any beam included in the first beam set meet the accuracy requirements and the relative rankings of the beams meet the requirements.
  • This implementation indicates that the predicted beam measurement results are similar to the actual beam measurement results, that is, the predicted beam measurement results are relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the predicted results are valid.
  • Condition 2 can be combined with Condition 4 to determine the following: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold, and the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result for the beams in the first beam set is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result for the beams in the first beam set, or in other words, the beam measurement results corresponding to some of the beams contained in the first beam set meet the accuracy requirements and the relative rankings of the beams meet the requirements.
  • This implementation indicates that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the predicted result is valid.
  • condition 2 and condition 3 makes the judgment condition: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams in the first beam set or The ratio of the number of beams in the first beam set to the number of beams in the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold, and the beams in the first beam set are the same as the beams in the second beam set.
  • the beam measurement results corresponding to some beams in the first beam set meet the accuracy requirement, and all beam identifiers in the beam set meet the accuracy requirement.
  • This implementation indicates that the predicted beam measurement result is close to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the predicted result is valid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid, and m is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • condition 2 The judgment condition after combining condition 2, condition 1 and condition 3 is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the first m best beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the judgment condition after combining condition 2, condition 1, condition 3 and condition 5 is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the first m best beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is less than or equal to the first threshold.
  • the ratio of the number of beams whose absolute value is less than or equal to the first threshold to the number of beams included in the first beam set or the second beam set is greater than or equal to the second threshold, and the number of beams included in the first beam set is less than or equal to the second threshold.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set, and the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results of the beams in the first beam set is the same as the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results of the beams in the second beam set.
  • the beam measurement results of some beams included in the first beam set meet the accuracy
  • the beam identifiers included in the beam set meet the standard
  • the absolute ranking of the beams meets the standard, indicating that the predicted beam measurement result is similar to the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is relatively accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is valid.
  • the first beam set includes beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6, and the second beam set includes beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as those included in the second beam set.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set, determined based on the predicted beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set, determined based on the actual beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is valid.
  • the terminal device determines whether the prediction result based on the first model is valid when the first condition is met, and then The first information of the first model is sent to the network device, and the first information includes information related to the validity of the prediction result.
  • the network device can clearly understand the performance of the first model, thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • the terminal device determines that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the second condition includes one or more of the following eight conditions. The eight conditions are described below.
  • Condition 9 An absolute value of a difference between a predicted beam measurement result corresponding to at least one beam in the first beam set and an actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is greater than a first threshold.
  • Condition 10 The absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than the second threshold.
  • Condition 11 The beams included in the first beam set are not completely identical to the beams included in the second beam set.
  • Condition 12 The beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is different from the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • Condition 13 The beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is different from the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result.
  • Condition 14 a ratio of the number of beams included in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams included in the second beam set is less than a third threshold.
  • Condition 15 The beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result does not belong to the second beam set.
  • Condition 16 The beam in the second beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result does not belong to the first beam set.
  • the first beam set is a beam set determined based on a predicted beam result
  • the second beam set is a beam set determined based on an actual beam measurement result
  • the terminal device may determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement and the actual beam measurement result is greater than the first threshold, it may be referred to as substandard accuracy.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the network device configures a terminal device to measure beams 1, 3, and 5 associated with cell 1, and predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict and actually measure beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains actual measurement results of -97dBm, -98dBm, and -99dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • the terminal device obtains prediction results of -99dBm, -102dBm, and -100dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • K is 2, and the first threshold is 1dB.
  • the two best beams predicted this time are beam 2 and beam 6, that is, the first beam set includes beam 2 and beam 6, and the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (greater than the first threshold value), and the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 6 is equal to 1dB (equal to the first threshold value).
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the corresponding predicted beam measurement result and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than the second threshold, which can be called the beam measurement results corresponding to a certain proportion of beams do not meet the accuracy standards.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains measurement results corresponding to beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 through the actual measurement process as -97dBm, -98dBm, and -99dBm, respectively.
  • the measurement results corresponding to beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 obtained through the prediction process are -99dBm, -102dBm, and -100dBm, respectively.
  • the value of K is 3, and the value of the first threshold is 3dB. It can be seen that this time The top three best predicted beams are beam 2, beam 6 and beam 4 respectively.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (less than the first threshold value)
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 6 is equal to 1dB (less than the first threshold value)
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 4 is equal to 4dB (greater than the first threshold value).
  • the second threshold value is 75%, since the beam measurement result prediction results corresponding to only two of the three best beams meet the accuracy requirements and fail to meet the 75% ratio requirement, the terminal device determines that the beam measurement result prediction behavior is invalid.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are not exactly the same as the beams included in the second beam set.
  • the first beam set contains at least one beam that does not exist in the second beam set, or the second beam set contains at least one beam that does not exist in the first beam set. If condition 11 is met, it means that the predicted beam measurement result is significantly different from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate, and therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are not exactly the same as the beams included in the second beam set, which can be referred to as the beam identification included in the beam set not meeting the standard.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure beams 1, 3, and 5 associated with cell 1, and predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • K is 2.
  • the terminal device obtains through actual measurement the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, which are beams 4 and 6 (at this time, beams 4 and beam 6 form the second beam set).
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure beam 1, beam 3, and beam 5 associated with cell 1, and configures the terminal device to predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 and actually measure beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains the measurement results corresponding to beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 through the actual measurement process as -99dBm, -100dBm, and -97dBm, respectively.
  • the judgment condition is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is greater than the first threshold, or the beams included in the first beam set are not exactly the same as the beams included in the second beam set, or the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result of the beams in the first beam set is different from the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result of the beams in the second beam set, or the beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set is not up to standard, or the beams included in the set are not up to standard, or the absolute ranking of the beams is not up to standard.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • beams 4 and 6 form the second beam set.
  • the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1 obtained through the prediction process are beams 2 and 6 (at this time, beams 2 and 6 form the first beam set).
  • the beam included in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set is beam 6. If the third threshold is 75% and the ratio of the number of beams included in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams included in the second beam set is 50%, the terminal device determines that the current beam measurement result prediction behavior is invalid.
  • condition 14 can be combined with other conditions to determine whether the prediction result is invalid.
  • condition 14 can be combined with condition 9
  • condition 14 can also be combined with condition 10
  • condition 14 can also be combined with condition 12.
  • the judgment condition after combining condition 12 and condition 14 is: the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is different from the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement result, or the ratio of the number of beams contained in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams contained in the second beam set is less than the third threshold, or, in other words, the relative ranking of the beams contained in the first beam set does not meet the standard, or a certain proportion of the beam identifiers do not meet the standard, indicating that the predicted beam measurement result is quite different from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 6
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 6. If the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set contains two beams, and the third threshold is 75%, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the intersection of the first beam set and the second beam set to the number of beams contained in the second beam set is less than 75%, then the terminal device determines that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result does not belong to the second beam set, or in other words, the second beam set does not include the beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result, indicating that the predicted beam measurement result is quite different from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the network device configures a terminal device to measure beams 1, 3, and 5 associated with cell 1, and predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict and actually measure beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains actual measurement results of -97dBm, -99dBm, and -103dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • the prediction results for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1 are -100dBm, -101dBm, and -99dBm, respectively, and K is 2.
  • the ranking of the beam sets associated with cell 1 obtained through the prediction process shows that the two best predicted beams are beams 2 and 6, respectively.
  • the first beam set includes beams 2 and 6.
  • the terminal device obtains, through actual measurement, the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, as beams 2 and 4 (at this point, beams 2 and 4 form the second beam set).
  • the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result among the beams in the first beam set is beam 6, which does not belong to the second beam set. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that this prediction result is invalid.
  • the beam with the best predicted beam measurement result belongs to the top K beams with the best actual beam measurement result, reflecting the accuracy of the prediction result within an acceptable error range, which is conducive to the network equipment to correctly perform resource scheduling operations related to the best beam (for example: beam management scheduling, configuration of non-contention-based random access resources), thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • condition 15 can be used in combination with other conditions to determine whether the prediction result is invalid.
  • condition 15 can be combined with condition 9.
  • the judgment condition is: the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result of the beam in the first beam set does not belong to the second beam set, or the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the best beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is greater than the first threshold, or in other words, the beam measurement result corresponding to the best beam in the first beam set does not meet the accuracy standard, or the second beam set does not contain the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result in the first beam set.
  • This implementation method indicates that the beam measurement result corresponding to the predicted best beam differs significantly from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result, determined based on the predicted beam measurement results, is beam 2, and belongs to the second beam set.
  • the terminal device may determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the network device configures a terminal device to measure beams 1, 3, and 5 associated with cell 1, and predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict and actually measure beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains actual measurement results of -97dBm, -104dBm, and -103dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • the terminal device obtains prediction results of -99dBm, -102dBm, and -100dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • K is 2, and the first threshold is 1dB.
  • the two best beams predicted this time are beam 2 and beam 6, that is, the first beam set includes beam 2 and beam 6.
  • the terminal device obtains the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 through the actual measurement process, which are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the second beam set).
  • the beam in the first beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the predicted beam measurement result is beam 2, which belongs to the second beam set.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (greater than the first threshold value), which does not meet the judgment of the combination of conditions 15 and 9. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the beam in the second beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result does not belong to the first beam set, or in other words, the first beam set does not include the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result in the second beam set, which means that the top K beams with the best predicted beam measurement results do not include the beam with the best actual beam measurement result, that is, the beam with the best actual beam measurement result cannot be predicted relatively accurately. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the ranking of the beam sets associated with Cell 1 obtained through the prediction process shows that the two best predicted beams are Beams 2 and 4, respectively.
  • the first beam set includes Beams 2 and 4.
  • the terminal device obtains the best beam measurement results for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1 through actual measurement.
  • the first two beams are beams 2 and 6 (beams 2 and 6 now form the second beam set).
  • the beam in the second beam set with the best beam measurement result, determined based on the actual beam measurement results, is beam 6, which does not belong to the first beam set. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • condition 16 can be used in combination with other conditions to determine whether the prediction result is invalid.
  • condition 16 can be combined with condition 9.
  • the judgment condition is: the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result in the second beam set does not belong to the first beam set, or the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the best beam in the second beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is greater than the first threshold, or the accuracy of the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the best beam in the second beam set does not meet the standard, or the first beam set does not contain the beam with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result in the second beam set.
  • This implementation method indicates that the beam with the best actual beam measurement result cannot be accurately predicted within the error range or the accuracy of the predicted beam measurement result of the beam with the best actual beam measurement result does not meet the standard. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the terminal device may determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the network device configures a terminal device to measure beams 1, 3, and 5 associated with cell 1, and predict beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to both predict and actually measure beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1.
  • the terminal device obtains actual measurement results of -97dBm, -104dBm, and -103dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • the terminal device obtains prediction results of -99dBm, -102dBm, and -100dBm for beams 2, 4, and 6 associated with cell 1, respectively.
  • K is 2, and the first threshold is 1dB.
  • the two best beams predicted this time are beam 2 and beam 6, that is, the first beam set includes beam 2 and beam 6.
  • the terminal device obtains the top two beams with the best beam measurement results among beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6 associated with cell 1 through the actual measurement process, which are beam 2 and beam 6 (at this time, beam 2 and beam 6 form the second beam set).
  • the beam in the second beam set with the best beam measurement result determined based on the actual beam measurement result is beam 2, which belongs to the first beam set.
  • the absolute value of the difference between the predicted result and the actual measurement result of beam 2 is equal to 2dB (greater than the first threshold value), which does not meet the judgment of the combination of conditions 16 and 9. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • conditions 9 and 12 can be combined, conditions 9 and 11 can be combined, or conditions 9, 11, and 12 can be combined.
  • conditions 10 and 11, conditions 10 and 12 can be combined, or conditions 10, 11, and 12 can be combined.
  • Condition 10 condition 9 and condition 12 are combined, condition 10, condition 9 and condition 11 are combined, and condition 10, condition 9, condition 11 and condition 13 are combined.
  • Condition 9 can be combined with condition 12 to determine the following conditions: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to at least one beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is greater than a first threshold, or the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result of the beams in the first beam set is different from the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result of the beams in the first beam set, or the beam measurement result accuracy corresponding to the beams included in the first beam set does not meet the standard or the relative ranking of the beams does not meet the standard.
  • any one of conditions 12 and 9 it means that the predicted beam measurement result is different from the actual beam measurement result.
  • the actual beam measurement result is quite different from the predicted beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the predicted result is invalid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the combined determination conditions of conditions 10 and 12 are: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to the beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams of the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than the second threshold; or the beam arrangement order determined based on the predicted beam measurement result for the beams in the first beam set is different from the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement result for the beams in the first beam set; or, in other words, the beam measurement results corresponding to some of the beams contained in the first beam set do not meet the accuracy standard or the relative ranking of the beams does not meet the standard.
  • This implementation indicates that the predicted beam measurement result differs significantly from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the combined determination conditions of conditions 10 and 11 are: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement result corresponding to a beam in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement result corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the number of beams at the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than the second threshold; or the beams contained in the first beam set are not completely identical to the beams contained in the second beam set; or, in other words, the beam measurement results corresponding to some beams contained in the first beam set do not meet the accuracy requirements, or the identifiers of some beams contained in the beam set do not meet the requirements.
  • the combined determination conditions of conditions 10, 9, and 12 are: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the first m best beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is greater than a first threshold, or the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is less than or equal to the first threshold; the ratio of the number of beams in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than a second threshold, or the beams in the first beam set are based on the predicted beam measurement results.
  • the beam arrangement order determined by the measured beam measurement results is different from the beam arrangement order determined based on the actual beam measurement results of the beams in the first beam set.
  • the beam measurement results corresponding to some beams included in the first beam set are not up to standard in accuracy, or the relative rankings are not up to standard. That is to say, as long as any one of conditions 9, 10 and 12 is met, it means that the predicted beam measurement result is significantly different from the actual beam measurement result, that is, the predicted beam measurement result is not very accurate. Therefore, the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid, and m is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • the judgment condition after combining conditions 10, 9 and 11 is: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the first m best beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beam is greater than the first threshold, or the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beam is less than or equal to the first threshold, and the ratio of the number of beams contained in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than the second threshold, or the beams contained in the first beam set are not exactly the same as the beams contained in the second beam set, or the beam measurement results corresponding to some of the beams contained in the first beam set do not meet the standards, or the beams contained in the beam set do not meet the standards.
  • the terminal device can determine that the current prediction result is invalid.
  • Condition 10, Condition 9, Condition 11, and Condition 13 are as follows: the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the top m best beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is greater than a first threshold; or the absolute value of the difference between the predicted beam measurement results corresponding to the beams in the first beam set and the actual beam measurement results corresponding to the same beams is less than or equal to the first threshold; the ratio of the number of beams included in the first beam set and the number of beams included in the first beam set or the second beam set is less than a second threshold; or the beams included in the first beam set are not completely identical to the beams included in the second beam set; or the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results is different from the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results; or in other words, the beam measurement result accuracy of some beams included in the first beam set does not meet the standard; or the beam
  • the terminal device can determine that the prediction result is invalid.
  • the first beam set includes beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6, and the second beam set includes beam 2, beam 4, and beam 6.
  • the beams included in the first beam set are the same as the beams included in the second beam set.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the first beam set, determined based on the predicted beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the beam arrangement order of the beams in the second beam set, determined based on the actual beam measurement results, is beam 2 ⁇ beam 4 ⁇ beam 6.
  • the terminal device may determine that the predicted result is invalid.
  • the terminal device determines whether the prediction result based on the first model is invalid when the second condition is met, and then the terminal device sends first information for the first model to the network device.
  • the first information includes information related to the invalidity of the prediction result.
  • the sending of the first information may be triggered by a first event, or in other words, when the first event is triggered, the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • the first event may be associated with one or more of the following information: a first timer; the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement result is judged; a first moment; the number of times the prediction result is invalid; the number of times the first information is sent.
  • the first event is described below. It may include one or more of the following: a first timer expiration; the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement result is determined to have reached a fourth threshold; the first moment arrives; the number of consecutive invalid prediction results determinations reaches a fifth threshold; or the number of first information transmissions does not reach a sixth threshold.
  • the first event may include a first timer expiration. When the first timer expires, the first event may be triggered.
  • the first timer may be a periodic reporting timer or a single reporting timer.
  • a single reporting can be understood as a single reporting, that is, based on the first timer, the terminal device only sends the first information once.
  • the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • the start condition of the first timer may include the terminal device receiving third configuration information sent by the network device, where the third configuration information includes a duration parameter for configuring the first timer.
  • the network device configures the duration parameter of the first timer for the terminal device, the terminal device starts the first timer, and when the first timer times out, the terminal device sends the first information to the network device, where the duration of the first timer may be the duration indicated by the duration parameter.
  • the terminal device stops the operation of the first timer, where k1 and k2 are both integers greater than or equal to 1, and the duration of the first timer can be the duration indicated by the duration parameter.
  • the parameters k1 and k2 are obtained by protocol default, or can also be configured to the terminal device by the network device.
  • the network device can configure the parameters k1 and k2 to the terminal device through dedicated signaling or through a system broadcast message.
  • the network device may send the third configuration information to the terminal device through dedicated signaling or through a system broadcast message.
  • the terminal device For example, if the terminal device receives the third configuration information sent by the network device, the terminal device starts the first timer for the first time, and the value of the first timer is equal to the duration indicated by the third configuration information. When the first timer times out, and the terminal device has sent the first information to the network device, the terminal device starts the first timer again.
  • the terminal device also needs to additionally determine whether the total number of times P of the first information that the terminal device has reported in the previous process, including the first information reported this time, is equal to the Q value.
  • the first timer is started again, and the above behavior is performed again (the first information is reported after the first timer times out and the latest P value is determined to be equal to Q); if the P value is equal to the Q value, the first timer is no longer started because the periodic event has been executed, where P and Q are both positive integers greater than or equal to 1.
  • the terminal device when the number of times the terminal device determines the validity of the predicted beam measurement result reaches a fourth threshold, the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • each round of performance monitoring process needs to meet the fourth threshold when the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement result is determined can trigger a performance monitoring result (i.e., the first information) to be reported.
  • the fourth threshold may be agreed upon by default, or configured by the network device to the terminal device through dedicated signaling, or configured by the network device to the terminal device through a system broadcast message.
  • reporting of the first information can be triggered by the number of times the terminal device sends the first information falling short of a sixth threshold. Each time the terminal device sends the first information to the network device, the performance monitoring process does not cease. Instead, the terminal device determines whether to continue the performance monitoring process by comparing the number of times the first information has been sent with the sixth threshold.
  • the terminal device receives the Q1 configuration sent by the network as the sixth threshold, after the terminal device sends the performance monitoring result (i.e., the first information) to the network device for the first time, it will not stop the performance monitoring process, but will continue to perform (Q1-1) first information reporting according to the indication of the Q1 value.
  • the terminal device sends the first information to the network device, it needs to calculate the number of times the information has been reported (hereinafter referred to as P1) and compare it with Q1.
  • P1 the number of times the information has been reported
  • the terminal device can compare with Q1 in the following manner: each time the terminal device sends the first information to the network device, it needs to calculate whether the number of times P1 of the first information reported by the terminal device since the first information was reported is equal to Q1. If P1 is less than Q1, the terminal device continues to perform the performance monitoring process; if P1 is equal to Q1, it indicates that the entire performance monitoring task has been completed and the performance monitoring process is no longer performed. In this method, the terminal device reports the first information a total of Q1 times.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to determine whether the prediction result is valid once every 4 predictions, the fourth threshold is 5, and the sixth threshold is 3, the terminal device will trigger the first first information report only after performing 20 beam measurement result predictions (corresponding to the 1st to 20th predictions after the start of the performance monitoring task); then, the terminal device will trigger the second first information report only after continuing to perform 20 beam measurement result predictions (corresponding to the 21st to 40th predictions after the start of the performance monitoring task); and finally, it will trigger the third (i.e., the last) first information report only after performing 20 beam measurement result predictions (corresponding to the 41st to 60th predictions after the start of the performance monitoring task). In this method, since the sixth threshold is 3, the terminal device reports the first information a total of 3 times.
  • the fifth threshold may be agreed upon by default, or configured to the terminal device by the network device through dedicated signaling, or configured to the terminal device through a system broadcast message.
  • the terminal device when a first moment arrives (hereinafter referred to as t1), the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • the first moment can be understood as a specific moment or an absolute moment.
  • the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • the terminal device can avoid irregular transmission of the first information, thereby reducing the overhead caused by information reporting.
  • the network device may send second configuration information to the terminal device, and the second configuration is used to determine whether the first event is triggered.
  • the second configuration information includes parameter information for determining whether the first event is triggered, and the parameter information may include one or more of the following information: the duration of the first timer, the fourth threshold, the first moment, the fifth threshold, and the sixth threshold.
  • the terminal device may receive the second configuration information sent by the network device, and the second configuration information includes the duration of the first timer.
  • the duration of the first timer can be defined in the UTC time format or in a relative time manner, wherein the relative time manner includes one or more of a specified system frame number, a subframe number, a time slot number, and a symbol number. Configuring parameter information through the second configuration information is more flexible to implement.
  • the terminal device when the terminal device receives the time t1 configured for the first time, when the time t1 is reached, the terminal device sends the first information to the network device.
  • the terminal device when the number of times the terminal device continuously determines that the prediction result is invalid reaches a fifth threshold, the terminal device sends the first information to the network device. That is, when the number of times the prediction result is continuously determined to be invalid reaches the fifth threshold, the terminal device can send the first information to the network device at any time.
  • the frequency of the terminal device reporting the first information can be limited, thereby avoiding the information reporting overhead caused by the terminal device irregularly sending the first information;
  • the network device when the terminal device continuously determines that the prediction result is invalid, it means that the operating performance of the AI model has significantly declined, and by promptly notifying the network device, the network device is triggered to perform some actions to improve communication performance. For example, the network device deactivates the currently executed AI function and falls back to traditional communication technology to ensure that the communication performance remains in an effective state, thereby improving the reliability of the wireless communication system.
  • the terminal device may also send the first information to the network device.
  • the fifth threshold may be agreed upon by default, or configured to the terminal device by the network device through dedicated signaling, or configured to the terminal device through a system broadcast message.
  • the first time window length configuration may be agreed upon by default, or configured by the network device to the terminal device through dedicated signaling, or configured to the terminal device through a system broadcast message.
  • the terminal device may receive fifth configuration information sent by the network device.
  • the fifth configuration information is used to configure relevant parameters of the reference signal, which may include the first period parameter and/or the third beam set information.
  • the third beam set information is the set of beams that the terminal device needs to predict based on the beam measurement result. This information can be understood as indicating the range of beams included in the beam measurement result prediction. A beam range can also be understood as a beam set. A beam set can include both the beam set predicted by the beam measurement result and the beam set actually required for measurement.
  • the network indicates through the third beam set information that the beam sets for the predicted behavior of the terminal device beam measurement results are beam 2, beam 4 and beam 6, and at the same time indicates through the fourth beam set that the beam sets that actually need to be measured are beam 1, beam 3 and beam 5.
  • the first period parameter is used to indicate the transmission period of the reference signal associated with the beams in the third beam set.
  • the second period parameter is used to indicate the transmission period of the reference signal associated with the beams in the fourth beam set.
  • the fourth beam set is a set of beam components for which the beam measurement results need to be obtained through an actual measurement process. That is, the beam measurement results of the corresponding beams are always obtained through the actual measurement process of the terminal device.
  • the relevant parameters of the reference signal may include a first period parameter and a second period parameter.
  • the first and second periodic parameters can be defined using different parameters.
  • the first periodic parameter takes a greater value than the second periodic parameter.
  • the first periodic parameter can be an integer multiple of the second periodic parameter.
  • the measurement reference signal associated with the first periodic parameter can be configured at either a terminal device or cell granularity. The following describes these two implementations.
  • the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam associated with the first period parameter is nominally (from the perspective of a specific terminal device) and actually (from the perspective of the actual transmission of the reference signal by the network device) configured according to the terminal device granularity.
  • the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam associated with the first period parameter is only periodically sent in the time domain constrained by the first period parameter, and cannot be actually measured by the terminal device using AI function (hereinafter referred to as the first type of terminal device) outside the time domain constrained by the first period parameter.
  • the network device configures the terminal device to measure frequency 1.
  • the network device further indicates that the beam set actually required to be measured by the terminal device at frequency 1 is Beam 1, Beam 3, and Beam 5 associated with frequency 1.
  • the network device also indicates that the transmission period of the measurement reference signal associated with the beam set actually required to be measured by the terminal device (configured via the second period parameter) is 40 ms.
  • the terminal device can actually measure a round of beam measurement results corresponding to Beam 1, Beam 3, and Beam 5 every 40 ms at frequency 1.
  • the first period parameter is 160 ms
  • the terminal device can actually measure a round of beam measurement results corresponding to Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 every 160 ms at frequency 1.
  • the network device does not actually transmit the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam outside the time domain constrained by the first period parameter, the beam measurement results corresponding to Beam 2, Beam 4, and Beam 6 outside the time domain constrained by the first period parameter cannot be actually measured (even if the beam measurement results corresponding to Beam 1, Beam 3, and Beam 5 can be actually measured) and can only be obtained through inference.
  • the resource overhead of the network device in sending the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam can be saved.
  • the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam associated with the first periodic parameter is nominally configured according to the terminal device granularity but is actually configured according to the cell granularity.
  • the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam associated with the first periodic parameter can also be actually measured by the first type of terminal device outside the time domain constrained by the first periodic parameter.
  • the terminal device only performs performance monitoring and judgment actions in the time domain constrained by the first periodic parameter and there is no need to perform performance monitoring and judgment actions at other times, the first type of terminal device will not actively measure the measurement reference signal associated with the predicted beam outside the time domain constrained by the first periodic parameter (even if it can be actually measured).
  • the first type of terminal device only actually measures the beam measurement result corresponding to the predicted beam in the time domain constrained by the first periodic parameter.
  • the second type of terminal devices since the second type of terminal devices do not perform the beam measurement result prediction function and can only rely on the actual measurement process to obtain the beam measurement results corresponding to each beam of the cell, the second type of terminal devices will attempt to receive the measurement reference signal associated with any beam actually sent by the cell.
  • the embodiment of the present application configures different measurement configurations for different types of terminal devices by the network device to solve the coexistence problem of different types of terminal devices in the same cell.
  • the network device configures the following parameters for the terminal device: the beam set that actually needs to be measured (beam 1, beam 3 and beam 5), the second period parameter of the measurement reference signal sending period parameter associated with the beam set parameter that actually needs to be measured, the predicted beam set parameter (beam 2, beam 4 and beam 6) and the first period parameter of the measurement reference signal sending period parameter associated with the predicted beam set parameter.
  • the reference signal associated with the predicted beam set sent in the time domain constrained by the first period parameter is used for the terminal device to perform performance monitoring.
  • the network device configures the following parameters for the terminal device: the beam set parameters that actually need to be measured (beam 1, beam 2, beam 3, beam 4, beam 5 and beam 6), and the measurement reference signal sending period parameters associated with the beam set parameters that actually need to be measured (i.e., the second period parameters).
  • the network device configures different measurement configurations for different types of terminal devices, since the measurement reference signals are actually sent at the cell granularity, from the network device's perspective, the measurement reference signals associated with these beams are actually always being sent (that is, beam 1, beam 2, beam 3, beam 4, beam 5, and beam 6 are all being sent at all times). It's just that different types of terminal devices selectively perform measurement behaviors based on the measurement configurations they obtain. For example, the first type of terminal device measures the measurement reference signals associated with the predicted beam set parameters at different periods, while the second type of terminal device measures the measurement reference signals associated with all actually sent beams at the same period.
  • the solution of this example can effectively solve the coexistence problem of different types of terminal devices in the same cell, thereby avoiding the impact of the introduction of AI functions on the functions of existing non-AI terminal devices.
  • Capability information may include various contents, which are not specifically limited in the embodiments of this application. Capability information may be indicated at one or more of the following information granularities: carrier granularity, band granularity, band combination granularity, and frequency range granularity.
  • the terminal device may report the first capability information according to a single granularity, such as reporting according to carrier granularity, reporting according to frequency band granularity, reporting according to frequency band combination granularity, or reporting according to frequency range granularity.
  • the terminal device may also report the first capability information according to a composite granularity consisting of at least two single granularities, such as reporting according to frequency band granularity and frequency band combination granularity, reporting according to carrier granularity and frequency band granularity, reporting according to carrier granularity and frequency band combination granularity, reporting according to carrier granularity, frequency band granularity and frequency range granularity, reporting according to carrier granularity and frequency range granularity, or reporting according to carrier granularity, frequency band granularity and frequency range granularity.
  • the validity of the prediction result is related to one or more of the following information: predicted beam measurement results; actual beam measurement results; beam order determined based on the predicted beam measurement results; beam set determined based on the predicted beam measurement results; beam order determined based on the actual beam measurement results; beam set determined based on the actual beam measurement results.
  • the terminal device 300 also includes: a receiving unit for receiving first configuration information sent by the network device, the first configuration information including threshold information for determining whether the prediction result is valid, the threshold information including one or more of the following information: the first threshold, the second threshold, and the third threshold.
  • the receiving unit is configured to receive the parameter K sent by the network device.
  • the sending unit is used to send first information to the network device, including: when a first event is triggered, the sending unit is used to send the first information to the network device, and the first event is associated with one or more of the following information: a first timer; the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement results is judged; the first moment; the number of times the prediction results are invalid; the number of times the first information is sent.
  • the sending unit is used to send first information to the network device, including: when a first event is triggered, the sending unit is used to send the first information to the network device, and the first event includes one or more of the following: the first timer times out; the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement result is judged reaches a fourth threshold; the first moment arrives; the number of consecutive judgments that the prediction result is invalid reaches a fifth threshold; the number of times the first information is sent does not reach a sixth threshold.
  • the receiving unit is used to receive second configuration information sent by the network device, the second configuration information including parameter information for determining whether the first event is triggered, the parameter information including one or more of the following: the duration of the first timer, the fourth threshold, the first moment, the fifth threshold, and the sixth threshold.
  • the start conditions of the first timer include one or more of the following: the terminal device receives the third configuration information sent by the network device, and the third configuration information includes a duration parameter for configuring the first timer; the first timer times out; the terminal device sends the first information to the network device; the number of times the first information is sent does not exceed the sixth threshold; the number of consecutive determinations that the prediction results are invalid reaches the fifth threshold.
  • the conditions for stopping the first timer include: during the operation of the first timer, the number of consecutive determinations that the prediction result is valid reaches a seventh threshold; or, during the operation of the first timer, the terminal device receives a third indication message sent by the network device, and the third indication message is used to update or delete the previously configured duration of the first timer. parameter.
  • the terminal receiving unit is used to receive fourth configuration information sent by the network device, where the fourth configuration information includes the seventh threshold and/or the third indication information.
  • the receiving unit is used to receive fifth configuration information sent by the network device, and the fifth configuration information is used to configure relevant parameters of the reference signal, and the relevant parameters of the reference signal include a first period parameter and/or third beam set information, and the first period parameter is used to indicate the sending period of the reference signal associated with the beam in the third beam set, and the third beam set is a set of beam compositions that the beam measurement results need to be predicted by the terminal device.
  • the first period parameter is different from the second period parameter, wherein the second period parameter is used to indicate the transmission period of the reference signal associated with the beam in the fourth beam set, and the fourth beam set is a set of beams whose beam measurement results need to be obtained through an actual measurement process.
  • the beam measurement result includes beam measurement results for one or more cells, where the one or more cells include a serving cell and/or at least one neighboring cell of the terminal device.
  • the first capability information is indicated at one or more of the following granularities: carrier granularity, frequency band granularity, frequency band combination granularity, and frequency range granularity.
  • FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of a network device provided by an embodiment of the present application.
  • the network device 400 shown in Figure 4 may include a receiving unit, 410.
  • the receiving unit 410 is used to receive first information sent by a terminal device, the first information including a performance monitoring result for a first model, the first model being used to predict a beam measurement result, wherein the first information includes any one of the following information: one or more first indication information, wherein one first indication information in the one or more first indication information is used to indicate whether a prediction result is valid; second indication information, wherein the second indication information is used to indicate first proportion information or to indicate a proportion interval to which the first proportion information belongs, the first proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or including the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions; information used to calculate the second proportion information, the second proportion information including the proportion of the number of valid prediction results to the total number of predictions, or including the proportion of the number of invalid prediction results to the total number of predictions
  • the network device 400 further includes: a sending unit, configured to send first configuration information to the terminal device, where the first configuration information includes threshold information for determining whether the prediction result is valid.
  • the sending unit is used to send second configuration information to the terminal device, the second configuration information includes parameter information for determining whether a first event is triggered, the parameter information including one or more of the following: the duration of a first timer, a fourth threshold, a first moment, a fifth threshold, and one or more of a sixth threshold, wherein when the first event is triggered, the first information is sent by the terminal device to the network device, and the first event includes one or more of the following: the first timer times out; the number of times the validity of the predicted beam measurement result is judged reaches a fourth threshold; the first moment arrives; the number of consecutive judgments that the prediction result is invalid reaches a fifth threshold; the number of times the first information is sent does not reach the sixth threshold.
  • the sending unit is used to send third configuration information to the terminal device, where the third configuration information includes a duration parameter for configuring the first timer.
  • the sending unit is used to send fourth configuration information to the terminal device, the fourth configuration information includes a seventh threshold and/or third indication information, the seventh threshold is used to determine whether the first timer needs to stop running during the operation of the first timer, the third indication information is used to update or delete the previously configured duration parameter of the first timer, and the seventh threshold and/or the third indication information are used to determine whether the first timer needs to stop running.
  • the sending unit is configured to send fifth configuration information to the terminal device, where the fifth configuration information is used to configure relevant parameters of the reference signal, where the relevant parameters of the reference signal include a first period parameter and/or third beam set information, where the first period parameter is used to indicate a transmission period of a reference signal associated with a beam in the third beam set, and the third beam set information is used to indicate a transmission period of a reference signal associated with a beam in the third beam set.
  • the beam measurement result requires a set of beam compositions predicted by the terminal device.
  • the first period parameter is different from the second period parameter, wherein the second period parameter is used to indicate the transmission period of the reference signal associated with the beam in the fourth beam set, and the fourth beam set is a set of beams whose beam measurement results need to be obtained through an actual measurement process.
  • the beam measurement result includes beam measurement results for one or more cells, where the one or more cells include a serving cell and/or at least one neighboring cell of the terminal device.
  • the receiving unit is used to receive first capability information sent by the terminal device, where the first capability information is used to indicate whether the terminal device supports performance monitoring of the first model.
  • the first capability information is indicated at one or more of the following granularities: carrier granularity, frequency band granularity, frequency band combination granularity, and frequency range granularity.
  • FIG5 is a schematic block diagram of an apparatus for downlink transmission according to an embodiment of the present application.
  • the dashed lines in FIG5 indicate that the unit or module is optional.
  • Apparatus 500 may be used to implement the method described in the above method embodiment.
  • Apparatus 500 may be a chip, a terminal, or a network device.
  • the apparatus 500 may include one or more processors 510.
  • the processor 510 may support the apparatus 500 in implementing the method described in the above method embodiment.
  • the processor 510 may be a general-purpose processor or a special-purpose processor.
  • the processor may be a central processing unit (CPU).
  • the processor may be another general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc.
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor, etc.
  • the apparatus 500 may further include a transceiver 530.
  • the processor 510 may communicate with other devices or chips via the transceiver 530.
  • the processor 510 may transmit and receive data with other devices or chips via the transceiver 530.
  • the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium for storing a program.
  • the computer-readable storage medium can be applied to a terminal or network device provided in the present application, and the program enables a computer to execute the method performed by the terminal or network device in each embodiment of the present application.
  • the present application also provides a computer program product.
  • the computer program product includes a program.
  • the computer program product can be applied to a terminal or network device provided in the present application, and the program causes a computer to execute the method performed by the terminal or network device in each embodiment of the present application.
  • the embodiments of the present application also provide a computer program.
  • the computer program can be applied to the terminal or network device provided in the embodiments of the present application, and the computer program enables a computer to execute the method performed by the terminal or network device in each embodiment of the present application.
  • the term "indication” may refer to a direct indication, an indirect indication, or an indication of an association.
  • “A indicates B” may refer to a direct indication of B, e.g., B can obtain information through A; it may refer to an indirect indication of B, e.g., A indicates C, e.g., B can obtain information through C; or it may refer to an association between A and B.
  • B corresponding to A means that B is associated with A and B can be determined based on A.
  • determining B based on A does not mean determining B based solely on A, but B can also be determined based on A and/or other information.
  • the term "corresponding" may indicate a direct or indirect correspondence between the two, or an association relationship between the two, or a relationship between indication and indication, configuration and configuration, etc.
  • pre-definition or “pre-configuration” may be implemented by pre-storing corresponding codes, tables, or other methods that can be used to indicate relevant information in a device (e.g., a terminal device and a network device).
  • a device e.g., a terminal device and a network device.
  • pre-definition may refer to information defined in a protocol.
  • the “protocol” may refer to a standard protocol in the communications field, for example, it may include an LTE protocol, an NR protocol, and related protocols used in future communication systems, and the present application does not limit this.
  • the term "and/or” is simply a description of the association relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist.
  • a and/or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone.
  • the character "/" in this document generally indicates that the related objects are in an "or” relationship.
  • the order of execution of the above processes does not necessarily mean the order in which they are executed.
  • the sequence should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.
  • the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways.
  • the device embodiments described above are merely schematic.
  • the division of the units is merely a logical function division.
  • Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.
  • the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of these units may be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.
  • each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.
  • the computer program product includes one or more computer instructions.
  • the computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device.
  • the computer instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium.
  • the computer instructions can be transmitted from one website, computer, server or data center to another website, computer, server or data center by wired (such as coaxial cable, optical fiber, digital subscriber line (DSL)) or wireless (such as infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.).
  • the computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium that can be read by a computer or a data storage device such as a server or data center that includes one or more available media integrated.
  • the available medium may be a magnetic medium (e.g., a floppy disk, a hard disk, a magnetic tape), an optical medium (e.g., a digital versatile disc (DVD)), or a semiconductor medium (e.g., a solid state disk (SSD)), etc.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne des procédés de communication sans fil, des dispositifs terminaux et des dispositifs de réseau. Un procédé comprend les étapes suivantes : un dispositif terminal transmet des premières informations à un dispositif de réseau, les premières informations comprenant un résultat de surveillance de performances pour un premier modèle, et le premier modèle étant utilisé pour une prédiction de résultat de mesure de faisceau, les premières informations comprenant l'une quelconque des informations suivantes : un ou plusieurs éléments de premières informations d'indication, et l'un du ou des éléments de premières informations d'indication étant utilisé pour indiquer si un résultat de prédiction est valide ; des secondes informations d'indication, les secondes informations d'indication étant utilisées pour indiquer des premières informations de rapport ou étant utilisées pour indiquer une plage de rapport à laquelle les premières informations de rapport appartiennent, et les premières informations de rapport comprenant le rapport du nombre de prédictions avec des résultats de prédiction valides sur le nombre total de prédictions ou comprenant le rapport du nombre de prédictions avec des résultats de prédiction invalides sur le nombre total de prédictions ; et des informations utilisées pour calculer des secondes informations de rapport, les secondes informations de rapport comprenant le rapport du nombre de prédictions avec des résultats de prédiction valides sur le nombre total de prédictions ou comprenant le rapport du nombre de prédictions avec des résultats de prédiction non valides sur le nombre total de prédictions.
PCT/CN2024/077007 2024-02-08 2024-02-08 Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau Pending WO2025166752A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2024/077007 WO2025166752A1 (fr) 2024-02-08 2024-02-08 Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2024/077007 WO2025166752A1 (fr) 2024-02-08 2024-02-08 Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2025166752A1 true WO2025166752A1 (fr) 2025-08-14

Family

ID=96699070

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2024/077007 Pending WO2025166752A1 (fr) 2024-02-08 2024-02-08 Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2025166752A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023012141A1 (fr) * 2021-08-05 2023-02-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Informations de rétroaction de performance de modèle de signalisation (mpfi)
CN116933874A (zh) * 2022-04-02 2023-10-24 维沃移动通信有限公司 验证方法、装置及设备
CN116980990A (zh) * 2022-04-21 2023-10-31 维沃移动通信有限公司 信息发送方法、装置、终端、网络侧设备及存储介质

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023012141A1 (fr) * 2021-08-05 2023-02-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Informations de rétroaction de performance de modèle de signalisation (mpfi)
CN116933874A (zh) * 2022-04-02 2023-10-24 维沃移动通信有限公司 验证方法、装置及设备
CN116980990A (zh) * 2022-04-21 2023-10-31 维沃移动通信有限公司 信息发送方法、装置、终端、网络侧设备及存储介质

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP4102756B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'émission de signal
CN110447176B (zh) 检测方法和用户设备
EP2122929B1 (fr) Système de commande orienté réseau de configuration et d'optimisation automatiques de mesures
KR102434605B1 (ko) 통신 방법 및 통신 장치
CN114762446B (zh) 用于无线通信的方法和用户装备
CN109792768B (zh) 一种随机接入方法及装置
CN102907131A (zh) 决定实施信道状态信息测量的时间的方法及通讯装置
WO2021134455A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de mesure de gestion de ressources radio
EP3836597B1 (fr) Procédé, appareil et système de traitement de brouillage
US20230007590A1 (en) Communication method and apparatus
WO2022017086A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de transmission de signal, terminal, station de base et support de stockage
US20220095143A1 (en) ANR Configuration, Measurements and Reporting for Power Limited Devices
CN111614447A (zh) 无线链路状态指示上报方法和终端设备
WO2023125089A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de détection de défaillance
US20230345517A1 (en) Data Transmission Method and Apparatus
US20140357274A1 (en) Cell handovers
CN112165723B (zh) 测量方法及通信装置
WO2025166752A1 (fr) Procédés de communication sans fil, dispositifs terminaux et dispositifs de réseau
US20230239912A1 (en) Method for using unlicensed spectrum and apparatus
US20200260405A1 (en) Network access node and methods thereof
US20240284331A1 (en) Measurements to support low power wus
WO2025077274A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'utilisation de ressources, procédé et dispositif de configuration de ressources, et support de stockage
CN119563358A (zh) 通信方法、终端设备、网络设备和核心网设备
CN118509908A (zh) 测量报告的发送方法、装置及存储介质
CN113115484B (zh) 一种信道或/和信号的收发方法及装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 24922987

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1