[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2025008037A1 - Inspection de raccordements boulonnés dans une éolienne - Google Patents

Inspection de raccordements boulonnés dans une éolienne Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2025008037A1
WO2025008037A1 PCT/DK2024/050158 DK2024050158W WO2025008037A1 WO 2025008037 A1 WO2025008037 A1 WO 2025008037A1 DK 2024050158 W DK2024050158 W DK 2024050158W WO 2025008037 A1 WO2025008037 A1 WO 2025008037A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tension
tension parameter
sample time
determining
bolt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
PCT/DK2024/050158
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David ÖSTERBERG
Pedro Manuel LIMA CARNEIRO CAVALEIRO
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Original Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vestas Wind Systems AS filed Critical Vestas Wind Systems AS
Publication of WO2025008037A1 publication Critical patent/WO2025008037A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D80/00—Details, components or accessories not provided for in groups F03D1/00 - F03D17/00
    • F03D80/50—Maintenance or repair
    • F03D80/509—Maintenance scheduling
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D17/00—Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics
    • F03D17/001—Inspection
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04—Analysing solids
    • G01N29/043—Analysing solids in the interior, e.g. by shear waves
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D1/00—Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor 
    • F03D1/06—Rotors
    • F03D1/065—Rotors characterised by their construction elements
    • F03D1/0658—Arrangements for fixing wind-engaging parts to a hub
    • F03D1/066—Connection means therefor, e.g. bushings or adapters
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D13/00—Assembly, mounting or commissioning of wind motors; Arrangements specially adapted for transporting wind motor components
    • F03D13/20—Arrangements for mounting or supporting wind motors; Masts or towers for wind motors
    • F03D13/201—Towers
    • F03D13/205—Connection means, e.g. joints between segments
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
    • F16B31/00—Screwed connections specially modified in view of tensile load; Break-bolts
    • F16B31/02—Screwed connections specially modified in view of tensile load; Break-bolts for indicating the attainment of a particular tensile load or limiting tensile load
    • F16B2031/022—Screwed connections specially modified in view of tensile load; Break-bolts for indicating the attainment of a particular tensile load or limiting tensile load using an ultrasonic transducer
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/26—Scanned objects
    • G01N2291/269—Various geometry objects
    • G01N2291/2691—Bolts, screws, heads

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to systems, apparatus and methods adapted to schedule inspections of bolted connections in wind turbines.
  • Wind turbines are complex structures that require regular maintenance and inspection to ensure their safe and efficient operation.
  • One critical aspect of wind turbine maintenance is the inspection and maintenance of bolted connections which are used to join various components of the wind turbine together.
  • bolted connections are used at the flanged interface between a foundation of a wind turbine and the lowermost tower section in order to provide a secure connection of the wind turbine to the foundation.
  • Bolted connections also feature in the connection between a hub and the blades of a wind turbine, and also at the interface between tubular tower sections of the wind turbine.
  • Such connection arrangements are known to the skilled person.
  • Tension checking of bolted connections is a time consuming and physically demanding maintenance task, particularly when considering the number of bolted connections in a single wind turbine and factoring in the number of wind turbines in a typical wind farm, which may number in the tens to the hundreds.
  • One known approach is to provide indicia or markings on bolted connections so that visual inspection can reveal whether nuts have moved relative to the bolt which will reduce tension in the bolt.
  • a wrench can be used to re-torque the bolt.
  • the rotational position of the nut does not accurately reflect the tension within the bolt.
  • EP3040701 An approach proposed by EP3040701 is to use an ultrasonic system to test tension in bolted connections, whereby the system is a permanent installation for ongoing monitoring.
  • a system could be very costly, and may be prone to failures, thereby requiring further diagnostic action.
  • ultrasonic measurement systems are subject to uncertainty in their measurements.
  • a method for scheduling inspection of a bolted connection on a wind turbine comprising a bolt under tension.
  • the method comprises at a first sample time, determining a first tension parameter of the bolt, having an associated upper uncertainty bound, and, at a second sample time, determining a second tension parameter of the bolt, having an associated lower uncertainty bound.
  • a linear relationship is determined based on the upper uncertainty bound of the first tension parameter and the lower uncertainty bound of the second tension parameter.
  • a third sample time in the future is determined, at which a further tension parameter is determined. Based on the third sample time, an inspection event is scheduled.
  • a benefit of the invention is that inspection events are scheduled in an adaptive manner in a way that is responsive to the difference in values of those tension measurements but which takes account of the inherent uncertainty in such measurements without compromising safety. In this way, inspection events can be scheduled less frequently than is currently the case which presents a much-reduced maintenance cost while still ensuring the performance of the bolted connection.
  • the tension parameters in the above context may be a direct measurement or may be a statistical quantity calculated from a plurality of measurements.
  • the sample times as referred to above may also be expressed as calendar dates at which the tension parameters are determined/measured.
  • the invention extends to and therefore also embraces a system for scheduling inspection of a bolted connection on a wind turbine, the bolted connection comprising a bolt under tension.
  • the system comprises a measurement system adapted to determine, at a first sample time, a first tension parameter of the bolt, having an associated upper uncertainty bound, and to determine, at a second sample time, a second tension parameter of the bolt, having an associated lower uncertainty bound.
  • the system further comprises a computerised planning system adapted to: determine a linear relationship based on the upper uncertainty bound of the first tension parameter and the lower uncertainty bound of the second tension parameter, and, based on the linear relationship, determine a third sample time for determining a further tension parameter; and schedule an inspection event based on the determined third sample time.
  • a method for example a computer-implemented method, for scheduling inspection of an item or system to be tested.
  • the item or system may be any item or system having an attribute which degrades or reduces or increases over time at a non-linear rate.
  • the process may apply to oil contamination of a hydraulic system in which contamination increases over time, or to surfaces which wear over time to a critical level, thereby becoming thinner.
  • the method comprises at a first sample time, determining an attribute or parameter of the item or system, having an associated upper uncertainty bound, and, at a second sample time, determining a second attribute or parameter of the item or system, having an associated lower uncertainty bound.
  • a linear relationship is determined based on the upper uncertainty bound of the first attribute/parameter and the lower uncertainty bound of the second attribute/parameter. Based on that linear relationship, a third sample time is determined in the future, at which a further attribute/parameter should be determined. Based on the third sample time, an inspection event is scheduled.
  • Figure 1 is a front view of a typical horizontal-axis wind turbine to which the example of the invention may apply, in which an inset panel demonstrates a bolted connection;
  • Figure 2 is a system view of a system for scheduling an inspection event of a bolted connection in accordance with an example of the invention
  • Figure 3 is a flow chart embodying an example of the invention for scheduling an inspection event of a bolted connection in a wind turbine
  • Figure 4 is a chart illustrating tension of a bolted connection compared to time, which shows the scheduling of bolt inspection events.
  • the examples of the invention described here provide systems and corresponding methods for scheduling inspection events for bolted connections based on previously measured tension measurements of the bolted connections in way that is responsive to the difference in values of those measurements, but which takes account of the inherent uncertainty in such measurements without compromising safety. In this way, inspection events can be scheduled less frequently than is currently the case which presents a much reduced maintenance cost while still ensuring the performance of the bolted connection.
  • Figure 1 shows a typical horizontal axis wind turbine 2, that includes a nacelle 4, mounted on top of a tower 6, which supports a front facing rotor 8 comprising a plurality of blades 10.
  • the rotor 8 is connected to a powertrain or drivetrain housed within the nacelle 4.
  • the drivetrain comprises components required to convert rotation of the rotor 8 into electricity, including a generator, a gear system and a controller, although these components are not shown in Figure 1 or described in detail for brevity.
  • a horizontal-axis wind turbine is shown in Figure 1 , which is a common configuration of wind turbine, it should be noted that the invention may be applicable to other wind turbine configurations.
  • the tower 6 may be made from steel or concrete, the choice of which depends on many factors such as expected loading conditions, hub height, and location, to name a few examples.
  • Hybrid towers of concrete and steel are also known.
  • the tower is constructed from annular or tubular tower sections 20, as can be seen in Figure 1. Due to the slight tapering of the tower 6, each of the annular tower sections 20 are slightly frustoconical, in this example and can be considered as entirely, or mostly, made of steel which is a common material of construction for wind turbine towers.
  • each of the tower sections 20 are connected together by way of a flanged connection or ‘coupling’ 25.
  • a portion of a flanged connection 25 between the lower tower section 22 and the upper tower section 24 can be seen in the inset panel in Figure 1.
  • the flanged connection 25 comprises an upper tower flange 26 and a lower tower flange 28 which are adjacent one another so as to fit together in a butted interface.
  • the upper and lower tower flanges 26, 28 define respective through-bores that are aligned to provide a bolt hole 30 that extends through both flanges 26,28.
  • the bolt hole 30 accommodates a bolted connection 32.
  • the bolted connection 32 includes a bolt 34 and a nut 36.
  • the bolt 34 in this example is a headed bolt, having a shank 38.
  • the shank 38 has a threaded section 39 onto which the nut 36 is screwed in a conventional manner to bear against a washer 37.
  • the bolted connection 25 may include a stud bolt, rather than a headed bolt, in which upper and lower nuts are screwed onto correspondingly threaded ends of a double-headed shank.
  • Still further applicable bolted connections may be anchor bolts and bolt/nut arrangements at the fixing between a wind turbine tower and a foundation of a wind turbine installation. Note that bolts can be used in blind holes where a stud or headed bolt is threaded into a threaded hole in a component.
  • bolted connection 32 shown in Figure 1 illustrates a single bolt, although in practice a bolted connection would comprise a circular array of bolts arranged circumferentially around a circular flanged connection of the wind turbine. It should be noted, for the avoidance of doubt, that the term ‘bolted connection’ should not be considered limited to the specific bolted connection as shown in the illustrated example.
  • such a bolted connection 32 typically is pretensioned or preloaded to increase the effectiveness of the bolted connection and its resistance to cyclical loading.
  • the process of applying pretension to bolted connections is a known technique in this regard. It is also known that the pretension or preload induced in such bolted connections may reduce or ‘settle’ over time, for example by elongation of the bolt shanks or turning back of the nuts.
  • bolted connections in wind turbines are inspected regularly to ensure that the bolted connection is sound and to guard against an undetected excessive loss of pretension. Typically, such inspection events may be scheduled on a yearly basis. However, this requires a significant maintenance burden so it would be desirable to schedule bolt inspection events more intelligently to reduce maintenance effort whilst ensuring excellent safety of the bolted connections.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a bolt inspection system 40 inspecting the bolted connection 32 to determine the tension in the bolt and whether that tension is acceptable.
  • the bolt inspection system 40 is configured to schedule the next inspection event in an adaptive manner, thereby making efficient use of maintenance resources.
  • the bolt inspection system comprises a tension measuring system 42, a data store 44 and a computerised planning system 46.
  • the computerised planning system 46 may be a conventional general-purpose computer which may be housed at an appropriate location. As such, the computerised planning system 46 may comprise at least one processor 48, memory 50 and a suitable humanmachine interface or HMI 51.
  • the processor 48 may be programmed to process and/or execute digital instructions stored in memory 50.
  • Processor 48 may be any electronic device or circuit programmed and/or otherwise configured to perform the process steps and algorithm details described herein.
  • Memory 50 may include any non-transitory computer usable or readable medium, which may include one or more storage devices or articles.
  • Exemplary non-transitory computer usable storage devices include conventional hard disk, solid-state memory, randomaccess memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), as well as any other volatile or non-volatile media.
  • Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks and other persistent memory, and volatile media, for example, also may include dynamic random-access memory (DRAM).
  • DRAM dynamic random-access memory
  • storage devices are non-limiting examples; e.g., other forms of computer-readable non-volatile storage media exist and include magnetic media (e.g., disk or tape), compact disc ROM (CD-ROMs), digital video disc (DVDs), other optical media, any suitable memory chip, cartridge or flash RAM (e.g., such as a portable USB flash drive), or any other medium from which processor 48 can read.
  • memory 50 can store instructions executable by processor 48 and also can store data to be used when executing the instructions.
  • the HMI 51 may be any suitable interface for a user to engage with the computerised planning system 46 and may include a data entry system such as a keyboard or touch screen by way of non-limiting example, and a display such as an LCD screen.
  • a data entry system such as a keyboard or touch screen by way of non-limiting example
  • a display such as an LCD screen.
  • the data store 44 may be suitably configured to store large quantities of data and may include various kinds of mechanisms for storing, accessing, and retrieving various kinds of data, including a hierarchical database, a set of files in a file system, an application database in a proprietary format, a relational database management system (RDBMS), and so on.
  • the data store 44 may be hosted on a cloud-based hosting service and in such a case, and as shown here, is in communication with the computer system 46 and the tension measuring system 42 over a telecommunications network 52.
  • the telecommunications may be any suitable network, for example a wide-area network (WAN) such as the internet.
  • the computerised planning system 46 includes a suitable telecommunications interface 54 for communicating over the network 52 with the data store 44.
  • the data store 44 is separate to the computerised planning system 46, it is envisaged that in other examples the data store 44 may comprise a physical part of the computerised planning system 46 and not provided in the Cloud, as shown here.
  • the tension measuring system 42 may comprise a suitable system for measuring the tension of the bolted connection 32.
  • the tensioning measuring system 42 may apply a non-contact technique, e.g in the style of a non-destructive testing technique for determining the tension in the bolted connection 32.
  • a suitable tension measurement system is the ‘Bolt-Check’ product as available from R&D Test Systems A/S. Such a system is also described in W02020/108721 , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Since a suitable tensioning measurement system is available commercially, a full discussion of such a system will not be provided here.
  • the tension measuring system 42 is configured to apply an ultrasonic measurement technique to quantify the elongation of the bolt of the bolted connection 32 and therefore to calculate tension.
  • discussion herein concerning calculation of the ‘tension’ in a bolt also encompasses calculation of parameters from which the tension of the bolt can be inferred, for example from elongation of the bolt.
  • the tensioning measuring system 42 comprises an ultrasonic probe 60 and a user device 62.
  • the user device 62 may be any suitable general purpose computer system which is operable to interface with the ultrasonic probe 60 in order to conduct tension measurements of the bolted connection 32.
  • the user device 62 includes a suitable processing system 64, onboard memory 66 and a suitable HMI 68. Attributes of these components are comparable with those described with respect to the processor 48, the memory 50 and HMI 51 of the computerised planning system 46 described above, so further discussion will not be provided here.
  • the user device 62 is provided with a network interface 70 for communicating with the data store 44 over the telecommunications network 52.
  • Any suitable network interface 70 would be appropriate for achieving network communications with the network 52 either wirelessly or via a wired connection.
  • the method 100 begins at step 102 at which a set of initial conditions are established. It should be appreciated that the initial conditions discussed here may be varied from the specific examples given which will influence the exact functionality of the method 100. However, the purpose of the initial conditions is to strike a balance between scheduling bolt inspection events at time intervals to achieve a reduction in maintenance burden whilst avoiding any compromise to the safety case of the bolted connection 32.
  • the initial conditions may comprise 1) a value for minimum acceptable pretension (MAP), 2) a value for a minimum sampling period, 3) a value for measurement uncertainty and 4) a value for the initial or starting sample period and therefore a date/schedule for a second measurement.
  • the initial conditions may be initialised upon activation of the method as an application running on the computerised planning system 46.
  • the computerised planning system 46 may be configured to enable adjustment of the initial conditions so that a user may influence the precise functionality of the method as desired.
  • step 104 a first measurement of bolt tension is taken.
  • This step may be the first measurement that is taken of bolt tension following installation of the wind turbine. However, this is not critical and it may instead be the first measurement following reinitialization of the method following a re-tensioning of the bolted connection 32, for example.
  • the user device 62 receives data from the probe 60 and calculates the tension in the bolted connection 32. That tension measurement is then stored by the user device 62 into the data store 44 in the Cloud 52. As an alternative, the tension measurement may be stored in the user device 62 in local memory 66 to be accessed at a later time for further processing and calculation.
  • the first tension measurement may be stored in the data store 44 by way of a suitable data structure including such data as required to store and identify the required data for future use.
  • the tension measurement may be stored with a unique index value to aid future retrieval of said data from the data store 44, a time stamp, and uncertainty values associated with the tension measurements, as will be discussed later.
  • Other data items may also be stored such as the system identification item or code of the tension measuring system 42 that has carried out the tension measurement, such data possibly being useful for calibration or verification purposes.
  • a calendar date for a second tension measurement may be set. This may be achieved in various ways.
  • the date for next inspection may be determined by the user device 62.
  • the computerised planning system 46 communicates with the data store 44 and identifies that a first tension measurement has been stored, together with an identification of the date/time of measurement.
  • the computerised planning system 46 determines a calendar date for a second inspection of the bolted connection 32.
  • the computerised planning system 46 may schedule the date for second inspection internally within its onboard memory 50 so it can be accessed by appropriately trained maintenance personnel.
  • the computerised planning system 46 may communicate the date of second inspection to the data store 44. Still alternatively the user device 62 may access the date of second inspection date from the data store 44 or it may communicate with the computerised planning system 46 directly.
  • the inspection date may be based on the ‘starting sample period’ of the initial conditions. Note that the exact date an inspection takes place may differ from what has been scheduled, based on availability of a maintenance crew. Note also that the first and second dates for taking the respective first and second tension measurements may be determined at the same time as part of setting the initial conditions. In the above context, it should be appreciated that in the case where there are many such bolted connections to inspect, the computerised planning system 46 may determine different inspection due dates for different groups of bolted connections depending on how best to manage maintenance resources and activities.
  • Figure 4 provides a visual representation of the results of the method 100, with ‘time’ on the X-axis and ‘bolt tension’ on the Y-axis.
  • the X-axis is in unit of years from installation, and spans a time frame in excess of 30 years, which corresponds to the expected design life of a typical wind turbine.
  • the Y-axis is expressed as a percentage of bolt yield strength, with 100% tension corresponding to the yield strength of the bolt.
  • the first tension measurement P1 is therefore a percentage of the yield strength, for example 80% to 90% of the yield strength. It should be noted that the values shown here are merely exemplary.
  • the first tension measurement is indicated by P1 on Figure 4 at time T 1 and is also shown in enlarged detail on the inset panel.
  • the second inspection date may be one of the initial conditions that is set at step 102.
  • a second measurement is taken, as indicated at step 106.
  • the second inspection should take place as close to the scheduled second inspection date as possible.
  • the scheduled date can also be considered a ‘due date’. For example, it is possible that weather conditions may prevent sea-going vessels from ferrying maintenance personnel to an offshore wind turbine.
  • an inspection of the bolted connection is carried out as close to the second inspection date as possible, within acceptable constraints.
  • the method will replicate the measurement data and apply it to the date that has been set for inspection.
  • the algorithm may take into account a previous one or more tension measurements when calculating the next inspection date/due date.
  • the second measurement is illustrated on Figure 4 at P2 which is recorded at time T2.
  • the measurement P2 is stored in the data store 44 by the user device 62 transmitting the measurement data with appropriate date information over the communications network 52.
  • suitable data validity checks are carried out to check the tension measurement provides valid data.
  • One such validity check is to compare the tension measurement to the previous tension measurement to determine whether the subsequent tension measurement is greater than or less than the previous tension measurement, subject to appropriate uncertainty bounds for each tension measurement. If the subsequent tension measurement is determined to be greater than the previous tension measurement then the data is considered to be invalid for the purposes of the algorithm, and the process flow steps back to step 102. In effect, therefore, second tension measurement P2 is re-identified as the previous tension measurement.
  • This step is to detect circumstances where the bolted connection 32 may have been retightened in the interval between the two tension measurements P1,P2. This may be the case where there is a maintenance event in the intervening period the maintenance team has increased the tension on the bolted connection 32 without a specific instruction to do so. In his instance, therefore, the second tension measurement will be greater than the first tension measurement. In such a situation, the process can effectively be ‘reset’.
  • step 110 If the tension measurement taken at step 106 is considered to be valid, then the method proceeds to step 110 where further calculations are carried on the two tension measurements that have been taken. However, and has been shown in Figure 3, there is an option step 109 which takes into account timing for the second of the two tension measurements under consideration.
  • the principle of method step 109 is to take account for the second tension measurement P2 taking place before the time of the scheduled inspection date that has been set previously so that the second tension measurement P2 will be treated as having been taken at a minimum sample interval.
  • the minimum sample interval is one of the initial conditions that are set at step 102.
  • step 110 a relationship line or curve is calculated based the values of the two previous tension measurements P1 ,P2 and which takes into account certainty bounds associated with the two tension measurements. Pictorially, this can be appreciated by viewing Figure 4.
  • the method step 110 involves determining a linear relationship between the two data samples P1 and P2 which takes account of the inherent uncertainty in the data samples. The determined linear relationship can then be used to schedule an appropriate next inspection event for the bolted connection 32.
  • a linear relationship R1 is determined between the two tension measurements P1 and P2.
  • the linear relationship R1 interpolates beyond the data points P1, P2 and represents a worst-case scenario for the continued de-tensioning of the bolted connection.
  • the point at which the linear relationship R1 intersects a minimum acceptable pretension line, or ‘MAP’ line can be predicted as the appropriate point to set a next inspection date or ‘due date’ for the bolted connection 32.
  • MAP minimum acceptable pretension line
  • the invention takes into account that the tension measurements P1 and P2 that are acquired by the tension measurement system 42 have a level of uncertainty associated with them. As such, a more accurate determination of the next inspection date can be determined when the uncertainty inherent in the tension measurement data is taken into account.
  • the MAP line is set as an initial condition as discussed above.
  • the uncertainty or ‘uncertainty bounds’ associated with the measurements is also set at the initial condition stage.
  • the precise uncertainty that is appropriate for the tension measurement is dependent on the tension measuring system 42.
  • the tension measuring system 42 may be certified as providing a measure of tension in the bolt to an accuracy of +/- 5%, by way of illustration only.
  • the first tension measurement P1 has an associated upper uncertainty bound P1 U and a lower uncertainty bound P1L.
  • the second tension measurement P2 has an associated upper uncertainty bound P2U and a lower uncertainty bound P2L.
  • the upper and lower certainty bounds are determined based on the specific tension measurement and their associated uncertainty values. It will be appreciated that the linear relationship R1 is determined based on the upper uncertainty bound P1 II of the first tension measurement P1 and the lower uncertainty bound P2L of the second tension measurement P2. Determining the linear relationship R1 from the uncertainty bound values in this way builds in a safety factor to the calculation compared to simply determining a linear relationship based on the initial tension measurements.
  • the linear relationship, or ‘model’, or ‘curve’ or ‘line’ may be determined using a conventional least squares regression technique, as would be understood by the skilled person. Note that such a technique may be used to find a best fit line between more than two measurements, If appropriate. For example, if several tension measurements happen to be taken at relative short time intervals, then a plurality of those measurements may be taken into account in the regression calculation.
  • the method can move to step 112 in which the next inspection/due date is calculated based on the determined linear relationship R1 between the previous two tension measurement P1 ,P2 taking into account their associated uncertainty values.
  • the linear relationship R1 is used as a basis for determining the crossing point of the MAP line, which provides a sample time, marked here as T3.
  • This sample time T3 represents the next sample time at which a tension measurement should be made by the tension measuring system 42.
  • sample time T3 Once the sample time T3 has been determined by the computerised planning system 46, it can be used to schedule the next inspection date, at which a further sample/measurement can be taken, and stored in the data store 44 and communicated to the user device 62 for maintenance scheduling purposes.
  • next inspection date has been set at step 112
  • the process loops back to step 106 for the taking of the next tension measurement, and the entire process is repeated.
  • the next tension measurement is indicated at P3, so a linear relationship R2 is calculated based on the uncertainty bounds associated with tension measurements P2 and P3.
  • the consequent linear relationship R2 extrapolates from the data points P2 and P3 and crosses the MAP line at a time period labelled as T4 on Figure 4.
  • T4 is then set as the next scheduled maintenance event. Note that if the time period between T2 and T3 is less that a minimum time period, then the algorithm may take into account previous tension measurements as well when calculating the next inspection date/due date.
  • first and second measurements are the first two measurements taken by measuring system 42.
  • the first and second measurements may be any two consecutive tension measurements that are made in a series of such tension measurements.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé et un système de planification de l'inspection d'un raccordement boulonné sur une éolienne, ledit raccordement boulonné comprenant un boulon sous tension. À un premier moment d'échantillonnage, un premier paramètre de tension du boulon est déterminé, ayant une limite d'incertitude supérieure associée, et, à un deuxième moment d'échantillonnage, un deuxième paramètre de tension du boulon est déterminé, ayant une limite d'incertitude inférieure associée. Ensuite, une relation linéaire est déterminée sur la base de la limite d'incertitude supérieure du premier paramètre de tension et de la limite d'incertitude inférieure du deuxième paramètre de tension. Sur la base de cette relation linéaire, un troisième moment d'échantillonnage est déterminé dans le futur, auquel un autre paramètre de tension est déterminé. Sur la base du troisième moment d'échantillonnage, un événement d'inspection est planifié. Un avantage de l'invention est que des événements d'inspection sont programmés de façon adaptative d'une manière qui est sensible à la différence de valeurs de ces mesures, mais qui tient compte de l'incertitude inhérente dans de telles mesures sans compromettre la sécurité. De cette manière, des événements d'inspection peuvent être programmés moins fréquemment, ce qui est actuellement le cas qui présente un coût de maintenance beaucoup plus réduit et qui assure toujours l'intégrité du raccordement boulonné.
PCT/DK2024/050158 2023-07-04 2024-07-02 Inspection de raccordements boulonnés dans une éolienne Pending WO2025008037A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA202370357 2023-07-04
DKPA202370357 2023-07-04

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2025008037A1 true WO2025008037A1 (fr) 2025-01-09

Family

ID=91924283

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/DK2024/050158 Pending WO2025008037A1 (fr) 2023-07-04 2024-07-02 Inspection de raccordements boulonnés dans une éolienne

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2025008037A1 (fr)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110232071A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2011-09-29 Frank Knoop Wind power plant having multiple construction sections
EP3040701A2 (fr) 2014-12-12 2016-07-06 RWE Innogy GmbH Procede de surveillance ou de verification de la precontrainte de boulon filete sur des assemblages par vis soumis a des sollicitations dynamiques
WO2020108721A1 (fr) 2018-12-18 2020-06-04 R&D Engineering A/S Dispositif et procédé de mesure de tension de boulon
US20210178534A1 (en) * 2017-12-06 2021-06-17 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Automated tightening of bolts
WO2023281429A1 (fr) * 2021-07-08 2023-01-12 Sens-In S.R.L. Dispositif de fixation, procédé et système de surveillance
US20230141264A1 (en) * 2020-03-31 2023-05-11 Tribosonics Limited Bolt transducer

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110232071A1 (en) * 2008-04-02 2011-09-29 Frank Knoop Wind power plant having multiple construction sections
EP3040701A2 (fr) 2014-12-12 2016-07-06 RWE Innogy GmbH Procede de surveillance ou de verification de la precontrainte de boulon filete sur des assemblages par vis soumis a des sollicitations dynamiques
US20210178534A1 (en) * 2017-12-06 2021-06-17 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Automated tightening of bolts
WO2020108721A1 (fr) 2018-12-18 2020-06-04 R&D Engineering A/S Dispositif et procédé de mesure de tension de boulon
US20230141264A1 (en) * 2020-03-31 2023-05-11 Tribosonics Limited Bolt transducer
WO2023281429A1 (fr) * 2021-07-08 2023-01-12 Sens-In S.R.L. Dispositif de fixation, procédé et système de surveillance

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Oliveira et al. Vibration‐based damage detection in a wind turbine using 1 year of data
Tang et al. An experimental study of acoustic emission methodology for in service condition monitoring of wind turbine blades
Hu et al. Continuous dynamic monitoring of a lively footbridge for serviceability assessment and damage detection
Andrawus Maintenance optimisation for wind turbines.
TWI683058B (zh) 故障機率評估系統
Prowell et al. Shake table testing and numerical simulation of a utility‐scale wind turbine including operational effects
US20170350789A1 (en) Operating Wind Motors and Determining their Remaining Useful Life
Karyotakis On the optimisation of operation and maintenance strategies for offshore wind farms
Wei et al. Toward performance-based evaluation for offshore wind turbine jacket support structures
CN109406036A (zh) 在线监测风力发电机螺栓紧固应力的系统及方法
Pacheco et al. Fatigue assessment of wind turbine towers: Review of processing strategies with illustrative case study
WO2017163561A1 (fr) Dispositif de support d'exploitation et système d'énergie éolienne
EP2384971A1 (fr) Procédé permettant de déterminer une manoeuvre effectuée par un avion
Rubert et al. Wind turbine lifetime extension decision-making based on structural health monitoring
Peeters et al. Continuous monitoring of the Øresund Bridge: system and data analysis
Smith et al. Applicability of nacelle anemometer measurements for use in turbine power performance tests
JP6681776B2 (ja) グラウンドアンカーの健全度評価方法および健全度評価システム
Pacheco et al. Experimental evaluation of strategies for wind turbine farm-wide fatigue damage estimation
JP7263096B2 (ja) 風力発電システム及び風力発電装置のメンテナンス方法
Iliopoulos et al. Continuous fatigue assessment of an offshore wind turbine using a limited number of vibration sensors
Schedat et al. Structural health monitoring concept to predict the remaining lifetime of the wind turbine structure
CA3054397A1 (fr) Dispositif, procede et programme de gestion d'aeronef
WO2025008037A1 (fr) Inspection de raccordements boulonnés dans une éolienne
Chen et al. Re-tightening the large anchor bolts of support structures for signs and luminaires
Oliveira et al. Dynamic monitoring system for utility-scale wind turbines: Damage detection and fatigue assessment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 24742180

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1