WO2024209173A1 - Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps - Google Patents
Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024209173A1 WO2024209173A1 PCT/GB2023/050942 GB2023050942W WO2024209173A1 WO 2024209173 A1 WO2024209173 A1 WO 2024209173A1 GB 2023050942 W GB2023050942 W GB 2023050942W WO 2024209173 A1 WO2024209173 A1 WO 2024209173A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- alignment
- arm
- forceps
- upstand
- surgical forceps
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B17/30—Surgical pincettes, i.e. surgical tweezers without pivotal connections
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B2017/0042—Surgical instruments, devices or methods with special provisions for gripping
- A61B2017/00424—Surgical instruments, devices or methods with special provisions for gripping ergonomic, e.g. fitting in fist
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B2017/0042—Surgical instruments, devices or methods with special provisions for gripping
- A61B2017/00429—Surgical instruments, devices or methods with special provisions for gripping with a roughened portion
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to surgical forceps, particularly those for use in surgery, for example for forceps used in various open surgeries.
- the forceps may be used to grasp hold or manipulate tissues and objects as part of surgical operations concerning the removal of tumours, lesions and other abnormalities, which may be invisible to the eye and non- palpable, and which can be detected using a hand-held probe that emits an oscillating magnetic field to detect a localisation marker previously inserted in or near the tumours, lesions or other abnormalities.
- US 2019/0029560 Al discloses a magnetic marker comprising a single plug made of a single magnetically detectable ferromagnetic material, which has a magnetic susceptibility such that the marker is detectable using a handheld magnetic susceptometry probe.
- WO 2011/067576 Al discloses a system and method for locating injectable magnetic nanoparticles having a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 5-200 nm and preferably between 10-50 nm.
- Suitable susceptometry probes are disclosed by US 8174259 B2 (Hattersley et al.), WO 2014/140566 Al (Endomagnetics Ltd) and US 9239314 B2 (Endomagnetics Ltd and University of Houston), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- a surgical forceps comprising a first arm and an opposing second arm, each arm having an inner surface and an outer surface, wherein the first and second arms are joined at respective proximal ends thereof to form a spring hinge portion, wherein the hinge portion is configured to provide an outwards biasing force to bias apart the first and second arms about a hinge axis that passes though the hinge portion; and wherein in both an open and a closed configuration, the hinge portion is arcuate and extends around the hinge axis such that an inner surface of the hinge portion defines a void, the hinge axis passing through said void.
- the spring hinge portion of a pair of forceps is a region where it is known that detritus and therefore bacteria can accumulate.
- having surgical forceps with an arcuate hinge portion defining an arcuate void around the hinged axis can be advantageous, as the void is significantly easier to clean than known forceps, in which the first and second arms meet at a point.
- the surgical forceps may be configured to adopt a closed configuration when the biasing force is overcome, such that in the closed configuration respective distal ends of the first and second arms substantially contact each other, and an open configuration when the biasing force is not overcome, such that in the open configuration the distal ends of the first arm and second arm are not in contact with each other.
- the inner surfaces may oppose each other across a gap having a first distance.
- the radius of curvature of the inner surface of the hinge portion may be larger than the first distance between the first and second arms.
- the radius of curvature of the inner surface of the hinge portion may be between 1 and 10 mm, optionally between 1.5 and 7.5 mm, optionally between 2.5 and 5 mm, optionally between 2.5 and 5 mm, optionally between 3 and 4 mm, optionally between 3.5 and 3.9 mm, yet further optionally between 3.6 and 3.8 mm.
- the radius of curvature of the inner surface of the hinge portion may be approximately 3.75 mm.
- the outer surface of the spring hinge portion may have a substantially rounded profile. This may stiffen the two arms against lateral movement/skewing relative to each other, which advantageously helps improve alignment of the distal ends of the forceps when they are moved to the closed position.
- the forceps have a width, the width being a dimension aligned with the direction of the hinge axis. It may be that the forceps are widest at the hinge portion.
- the width of the forceps at the hinge portion may be between 7.5 mm and 20 mm, optionally between 10 mm and 17 mm and optionally between 12 mm and 15 mm.
- the width of the forceps at the hinge portion may be approximately 14 mm.
- the width of at least one of the first or second arms, optionally both of the first and second arms, may gradually taper to be narrower away from the hinge portion though a tapering portion, said tapering portion being positioned closer to the proximal ends of the first and second arms than the distal ends. Having a gradual transition in width reduction improves the stiffness of the first arm and/or the second arm.
- the curvature of an outer surface of at least one of the first or second arms may have a radius of curvature that increases away from the hinge portion along the length of the at least one arm through a transition portion, said transition portion being positioned closer to the proximal ends of the first and second arms than the distal ends.
- the transition portion may be at least 5mm long.
- the transition portion may be at least 15mm long.
- the transition portion may be at least 20mm long.
- the transition portion may be at least 25mm long.
- the surgical forceps may further comprise : a first alignment upstand arranged perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the first arm, a second alignment upstand arranged perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the second arm, the first and second alignment upstands positioned so as to allow for co-operative engagement of the first alignment upstand and second alignment upstand when the surgical forceps are moved to the closed position, and wherein the first and second alignment upstands are configured to prevent misalignment of the first and second arm when the forceps are moved to the closed position.
- a surgical forceps comprising a first arm and a second arm, wherein the first and second arm are joined at their respective proximal ends to form a hinge portion, wherein the hinge portion is configured to provide a biasing force to bias apart the first arm and second arm, wherein the surgical forceps further comprise, a first alignment upstand arranged perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the first arm, a second alignment upstand arranged perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the second arm, the first and second alignment upstands configured and arranged to prevent misalignment of the first and second arm when the forceps are moved to the closed position.
- the surgical forceps is movable between an open and closed position.
- the surgical forceps may be configured to take a closed position when the biasing force is overcome, such that in the closed position distal ends of the first arm and second arm are substantially in contact with each other.
- the surgical forceps may be configured to take an open position when the biasing force is not overcome, such that in the open position the distal ends of the first arm and second arm are not in contact with each other.
- first and second alignment upstand allows for the overall length of the upstands to be reduced relative to the thickness of the arms, when compared to prior art forceps that only have one alignment upstand. This allows for greater design flexibility as to which direction the alignment upstands provide alignment, for example, having two upstands allows for lateral, and distal/proximal alignment (i.e. in a direction aligned with the length of the first and second arms) to be provided, with lateral (i.e. in a direction tangential to the length of the first and second arms) alignment provided by one upstand and distal/proximal direction alignment provided by a second upstand.
- a first alignment recess may be incorporated into the second arm, the first alignment upstand and first alignment recess each being positioned so as to allow for co-operative engagement of the first alignment upstand in the first alignment recess when the surgical forceps are moved to the closed position.
- a second alignment recess may be incorporated into the first arm, the second alignment upstand and second alignment recess each being positioned so as to allow for co-operative engagement of the second alignment upstand in the second alignment recess when the surgical forceps are moved to the closed position. Co-operative engagement of the first and second upstands in their corresponding recesses may only occur in the case where the forceps are moved to the closed position while being misaligned.
- the overall length of the upstands being reduced relative to the thickness of the arms, as is allowed by having a first and second alignment upstand, reduces the likelihood of any alignment upstand protruding though their corresponding recess, and thus reducing the chance of an alignment upstand extending through a recess to injure a user of the forceps.
- the first alignment upstand and second alignment upstand may be each positioned closer to the distal ends of the first and second arms than the proximal ends. Being closer to the distal ends of the forceps improves the ability of the alignment upstands to prevent misalignment of the distal ends of the forceps as the forceps are moved to the closed position.
- the first alignment upstand may be configured to abut against the second alignment upstand when the forceps are moved to the closed position (while being misaligned) to prevent lateral and/or distal/proximal movement of the forceps.
- a distal portion of the first alignment upstand may be configured to abut against a proximal portion of the second alignment upstand when the forceps are moved towards the closed position (while being misaligned).
- the first alignment upstand may have a substantially arcuate shape with a distal surface and proximal surface. At least part of the second alignment upstand may be configured to abut against the distal surfaces of the first alignment upstand. By having an arcuate shape, the first alignment upstand may be able to prevent distal/proximal direction and lateral movement of the first arm relative to the second arm by engaging with the second alignment upstand.
- the second alignment upstand may have a substantially linear shape, for example a blade, or fin shape.
- the linear shape of the second alignment upstand may be aligned with the longitudinal axis of the second arm. This provides ample surface area to engage with the first alignment upstand and or the second recess, and improves resistance to misalignment in the lateral direction.
- the second alignment upstand may have a rounded region, for example a frustoconical region, located at a distal end of the linear shape, the rounded region being configured to engage with and abut against the arcuate shape of the first alignment upstand, when misalignment between the first and second arms occurs.
- a rounded region for example a frustoconical region
- the linear shape of the second alignment upstand may be aligned with the longitudinal axis of the second arm.
- the first alignment upstand may take the form of a cylinder.
- the second alignment upstand may take the form of a cylinder with a smaller diameter than the first alignment upstand.
- the first recess may be a hole that passes through the first alignment upstand, optionally through the centre of the first alignment upstand.
- the second recess may take a form such that it can receive the first alignment upstand.
- the first alignment upstand may take the form of an upstand having a substantially linear shape, such as a blade or a fin shape.
- a third alignment upstand having a substantially linear shape, for example a blade, or fin shape, the third alignment upstand arranged to be perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the second arm, the first and third alignment upstand positioned so as to prevent misalignment of the first and second arm when the forceps are moved to the closed position.
- the co-operative engagement of the first upstand and second alignment upstand may take the form of an edge of the first upstand being configured to abut the second upstand on one lateral side of the second upstand in the case that the tool is moved to the closed position while being misaligned.
- An edge of the third upstand may be configured to abut the second upstand on one lateral side of the second upstand the case that the tool is moved to the closed position while being misaligned.
- a third alignment recess may be incorporated into the second arm, the third alignment upstand and third alignment recess each being positioned so as to allow for co-operative engagement of the third alignment upstand and third alignment recess when the surgical forceps are moved to the closed position.
- the linear shape of the first, second and third alignment upstands may be aligned with the longitudinal axis of the first and/or second arm.
- the first and third upstand may be laterally and/or distally/proximally offset in relation to each other, and/or in relation to the second upstand. Such an offset may increase the ability of the forceps to correct for misalignment as they are moved to the closed position.
- the forceps may have a hinge axis that passes though the hinge portion.
- the hinge portion may define a substantially arcuate void, wherein the hinge axis passes through said arcuate void.
- the forceps of the first or second aspect may be formed from a material that does not conduct electricity.
- the forceps may be formed of a polymer, optionally a carbon-filled polymer, or optionally a glass-filled polymer.
- a carbon-filled polymer may comprise carbon fibres (in aligned or random orientation) and/or carbon spheres and/or carbon particles and/or carbon laminate material and/or carbon platelets.
- a carbon-filled polymer may comprise graphene.
- a glass-filled polymer may comprise glass fibres (in aligned or random orientation) and/or glass spheres and/or glass particles and/or glass laminate material and/or glass platelets.
- a benefit of glass-filled polymer is that it is not electrically conductive (and is, for example, less electrically conductive than carbon based composites), therefore giving an advantage when used with electrocautery tools as they do not conduct heat, which reduces the risk of burning the patient, or the tool itself deforming due to the heat. There is also a reduced risk of arcing or other electrical discharge when the forceps used with electrocautery tools, the flashes of such discharges being desirable to avoid, as they may impede the vision of a surgeon using the tool.
- the first arm and second arm of the forceps of the first or second aspect each may comprise a substantially flat surface arranged such that a user can apply force to the tool (via pressing on the flat surfaces) to overcome the biasing force.
- Each substantially flat surface may comprise a plurality of groves. This improves the grip of the tool and helps mimic the feeling of the steel tools to which a surgeon may be accustomed to using, thereby improving the ergonomic performance of the tool.
- the first arm of the forceps of the first or second aspect at its distal end, may comprise a first jaw portion, and the second arm, at its distal end, may comprise a second jaw portion, such that the first and second jaw portions touch when the surgical forceps is in its closed position.
- the first and second jaw portions of the forceps of the first or second aspect may comprise a plurality of teeth, wherein the plurality of teeth of the first jaw portion are offset from the plurality of teeth of the second jaw portion. This helps the jaw portions close in a flush manner, and prevents the distal ends of the arms of the forceps from splaying in the closed positon.
- the forceps of the first or second aspect may have a length, in the closed position, of between 145mm and 250mm.
- the forceps of the first or second aspect may have a length, in the closed position, of approximately 187mm.
- FIG. l is a schematic drawing of a handheld surgical forceps in accordance with the present disclosure.
- FIG. 2A is top-down view of the handheld surgical forceps shown in FIG. 1.
- FIG. 2B is bottom-up view of the handheld surgical forceps shown in FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3 is perspective view of the handheld surgical forceps shown in FIG. 1.
- FIG. 4A and Figure 4B show a cross-section view of the surgical forceps shown in FIG.1 at a distal portion of the forceps.
- FIG. 5A and Figure 5B show a cross-section view of a variant of a handheld surgical forceps in accordance with the present disclosure.
- FIG. 6A shows a cross-section view of a further variant of a handheld surgical forceps in accordance with the present disclosure.
- FIG. 6B shows a top-down view of one of the arms of a handheld surgical forceps in the handheld surgical forceps shown in FIG. 6A.
- FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings illustrates schematically a handheld surgical forceps (10) in accordance with the present disclosure, when the forceps (10) are in an open positon.
- the surgical forceps has a spring hinge portion (2) where a first arm (3) and a second arm (4) meet at proximal ends.
- the spring hinge portion (2) acts as a hinge that provides a biasing force to bias apart the first arm (3) and second arm (4). This biasing force can be overcome by applying force in a direction (D) to both the first and second arms.
- Each of the first and second arms (3, 4) are provided with grooves (6) which help to provide grip.
- Jaws (7) comprising a plurality of teeth (8) are provided on the distal end of the each of the first and second arm (3, 4).
- the first arm (3) has an inner surface (31) and an outer surface (32).
- the second arm (4) has an inner surface (41) and an outer surface (42).
- the spring hinge portion (2) acts as a hinge around a hinge axis (A, the axis being into the page at the point marked by the cross).
- the spring hinge portion (2) defines an arcuate void around the hinge axis (A).
- the arcuate void has a radius (r) that is larger than distance (D2) between the inner surfaces of the first arm (3) and second arm (4) in a region immediately adjacent to the spring hinge portion (2), when the forceps (10) are in the open opposition.
- the arcuate void has a radius as shown in Figure 1 of approximately 3.75 mm.
- the forceps have a length of approximately 186.59mm.
- the width of the forceps at the hinge portion, measured in the direction of the hinge axis, is approximately 14 mm.
- the first arm (3) has a blade shaped upstand (35), that comprises a rounded, frustoconical portion (37) at an end of the blade.
- the second arm (4) has a crescent shaped upstand (45).
- the upstands (35, 45) together prevent misalignment of the first and/or second arms as the arms are closed together and moved along the direction (D).
- the upstands (35, 45) interact so as to prevent misalignment in the distal/proximal direction (i.e. in a direction aligned with a longitudinal axis of the forceps (10)) and in a direction transverse to the longitudinal axis of the forceps (10).
- the shapes of the upstands are more easily shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 4A and FIG. 4B.
- FIG. 2A and Fig 2B the forceps (10) have their widest point at the spring hinge portion (2).
- the width of the each of the first arm (3) and second arm (4) then decreases gradually though a tapering region (33, 43) as each arm extends away from the spring hinge portion (2).
- Both the first and second arms (3, 4) are narrowest at their ends that are distal to the hinge portion (2).
- FIG. 2A shows a recess (36) in the first arm (3) configured to receive the crescent shaped upstand (45) of the second arm (4) when the arms are brought together along direction (D).
- the recess (36) can prevent misalignment by the crescent shaped upstand (45) abutting the sides of the recess in the case of misalignment, and the resultant camming forces returning the first and second arms (3,4) to an aligned position.
- FIG. 2B shows a recess (46) in the second arm (4) configured to receive the blade shaped upstand (35) of the first arm (3) when the arms are brought together along direction (D).
- the recess (46) can prevent misalignment by the blade shaped upstand (35) abutting the sides of the recess in the case of misalignment, and the resultant camming forces returning the first and second arms (3,4) to an aligned position.
- the forceps (10) have a rounded profile at the spring hinge portion (2).
- the radius of curvature of the outer surface (42) of the second arm 4 is also shown increasing from a flatter radius of curvature in the tapering region (43) to a more pronounced radius of curvature as the distance away from the spring hinge portion (2) increases.
- a substantially flat surface is provided where the groves (6) are present on the second arm (4).
- FIG. 4A and Fig 4B which shows a cross-section though a section of the forceps (10) in a perfectly aligned closed position
- the upstands (35, 45) do not touch when the tool is perfectly aligned, and sit within the recesses (36, 46) in such a manner so as not to apply camming forces to the inside surfaces of the recesses.
- the upstands (35, 45) are sufficiently short in height that they do not protrude through the recesses (36, 46) when the forceps are in the closed position.
- FIG. 5A and Fig 5B which shows a cross-section though a section of a handheld surgical forceps (20) in accordance with the present disclosure.
- elements of the handheld surgical forceps (20) shown in FIG. 5A and Fig 5B have elements previously described in relation with Figures 1 to 4. These elements will not be described again for the sake of brevity.
- a first arm
- the upstand (204) has a cylindrical upstand (245) that is surrounded by a moat like cylindrical recess (246).
- the upstands (235, 245) and recesses (236, 246) act to prevent misalignment as the forceps are moved from an open position, as shown in Fig. 5A, to a closed position, as shown in Fig. 5B.
- FIG. 6A and Fig 6B which shows a cross-section though a section of a handheld surgical forceps (30) in accordance with the present disclosure.
- elements of the handheld surgical forceps (30) shown in FIG. 6A and Fig 6B have elements previously described in relation with Figures 1 to 4. These elements will not be described again for the sake of brevity.
- a first arm
- a second arm (303) has a blade upstand (335) and a first recess (336) and second recess (337), the first and second recesses being adjacent to opposite edges (not shown) of the blade upstand (335).
- a second arm (304) has two blade upstands (345, 347) that configured so as to enter the first recess (336) and second recess (337) when the forceps are moved to the closed position along the actuation direction (A).
- the second arm has a recess (346) into which the blade upstand (335) on the first arm (303) can enter.
- the upstands (335, 345, 347) and recesses (336, 337, 346) act to prevent misalignment as the forceps are moved from an open position, as shown in Fig. 6A, to a closed position.
- the forceps are integrally formed of one-piece construction, and made of glass-filled polymer.
- the glass- filled polymer is in the form of fibres.
- the fibres may be arranged in random or aligned configurations.
- the filler can be organised in any known configurations, and may, for example take the form of a glass laminate, or a dispersion of glass particulates and/or glass platelets within the polymer.
- construction methods not using one- piece construction may be used.
- forceps may be used in the construction of the forceps, and while such materials are preferably materials that do not conduct electricity, that does not necessarily need to be the case, and forceps falling within the scope of the present disclosure may, for example be formed of metal material, such as a steel alloy or a polymer fdled with carbon fibre/laminate/particulates/spheres/platelets and/or graphene.
- metal material such as a steel alloy or a polymer fdled with carbon fibre/laminate/particulates/spheres/platelets and/or graphene.
- the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements.
- This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.
- spring hinge portion and “hinge portion” are used interchangeably throughout the specification for brevity. Nevertheless, it is implicit that the hinge portion as described in disclosures herein provides a biasing force such that it acts as a spring.
- the terms “approximately” and “about” may be used to mean within ⁇ 20 % of a target value in some embodiments, within ⁇ 10 % of a target value in some embodiments, within ⁇ 5 % of a target value in some embodiments, and yet within ⁇ 2 % of a target value in some embodiments.
- the terms “approximately” and “about” may include the target value.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202380096965.2A CN120897711A (en) | 2023-04-06 | 2023-04-06 | Improvements in surgical thumb forceps and related technologies |
| PCT/GB2023/050942 WO2024209173A1 (en) | 2023-04-06 | 2023-04-06 | Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps |
| AU2023439649A AU2023439649A1 (en) | 2023-04-06 | 2023-04-06 | Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2023/050942 WO2024209173A1 (en) | 2023-04-06 | 2023-04-06 | Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2024209173A1 true WO2024209173A1 (en) | 2024-10-10 |
Family
ID=86053580
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2023/050942 Pending WO2024209173A1 (en) | 2023-04-06 | 2023-04-06 | Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN120897711A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2023439649A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2024209173A1 (en) |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3604071A (en) * | 1969-07-25 | 1971-09-14 | Codman & Shurtleff | One-piece plastic towel clamp |
| US5019091A (en) * | 1987-03-23 | 1991-05-28 | Michael Porat | Forceps |
| US5921990A (en) * | 1997-08-06 | 1999-07-13 | Eagle Vision | Collagen forceps |
| US5972021A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 1999-10-26 | Bionix Development Corporation | Tissue approximation forceps and method |
| WO2011067576A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
| US8174259B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2012-05-08 | University Of Houston | Apparatus and method for determining magnetic properties of materials |
| WO2014140566A1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
| WO2015021333A1 (en) * | 2013-08-07 | 2015-02-12 | Cornell Universty | Semiconductor tweezers and instrumentation for tissue detection and characterization |
| US9239314B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-19 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
| US20190029560A1 (en) | 2012-07-16 | 2019-01-31 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic Marker for Surgical Localization |
| US20200289138A1 (en) * | 2019-03-17 | 2020-09-17 | Arculant, Inc. | Surgical instruments with coupling members to effect multiple pivot axes |
-
2023
- 2023-04-06 WO PCT/GB2023/050942 patent/WO2024209173A1/en active Pending
- 2023-04-06 CN CN202380096965.2A patent/CN120897711A/en active Pending
- 2023-04-06 AU AU2023439649A patent/AU2023439649A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3604071A (en) * | 1969-07-25 | 1971-09-14 | Codman & Shurtleff | One-piece plastic towel clamp |
| US5019091A (en) * | 1987-03-23 | 1991-05-28 | Michael Porat | Forceps |
| US5921990A (en) * | 1997-08-06 | 1999-07-13 | Eagle Vision | Collagen forceps |
| US5972021A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 1999-10-26 | Bionix Development Corporation | Tissue approximation forceps and method |
| US8174259B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2012-05-08 | University Of Houston | Apparatus and method for determining magnetic properties of materials |
| WO2011067576A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
| US20190029560A1 (en) | 2012-07-16 | 2019-01-31 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic Marker for Surgical Localization |
| WO2014140566A1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
| US9239314B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-19 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
| WO2015021333A1 (en) * | 2013-08-07 | 2015-02-12 | Cornell Universty | Semiconductor tweezers and instrumentation for tissue detection and characterization |
| US20200289138A1 (en) * | 2019-03-17 | 2020-09-17 | Arculant, Inc. | Surgical instruments with coupling members to effect multiple pivot axes |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN120897711A (en) | 2025-11-04 |
| AU2023439649A1 (en) | 2025-10-30 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN100493469C (en) | Surgical instrument | |
| US20220387068A1 (en) | Ultrasonic surgical blades | |
| JP6017759B2 (en) | Cannula | |
| CA2802366C (en) | Cannulated flexible drive shaft | |
| CN102892362B (en) | Arthroscopic resection device | |
| WO2016171963A1 (en) | Arthroscopic devices and methods | |
| EP1972288A1 (en) | Shaver blade with depth markings | |
| CN107536634B (en) | Surgical instrument with point contact in a coupling region | |
| WO2016172640A1 (en) | Surgical instrument compatible with operating room equipment | |
| WO2014077238A1 (en) | Treatment tool for endoscope | |
| US11786231B2 (en) | Surgical retractor | |
| CA2930605A1 (en) | Surgical multi-tool and method of use | |
| WO2024209173A1 (en) | Improvments in and relating to surgical thumb forceps | |
| US11311305B2 (en) | Surgical instruments with coupling members to effect multiple pivot axes | |
| CN109496140B (en) | Surgical instrument with spaced apart pivoting elements | |
| CN209916231U (en) | Guide sleeve and surgical instrument | |
| WO2024209174A1 (en) | Improvments in and relating to surgical retractors | |
| CN204394632U (en) | A kind of twolip scalpel | |
| EP3527152B1 (en) | Tool for a microinvasive surgical instrument and microinvasive surgical instrument | |
| CN213430281U (en) | Hook knife for intervertebral foramen | |
| JP2024520042A (en) | Medical instrument having spring unit optimized for cleaning - Patent application | |
| US20250143732A1 (en) | Relating To THE MANUFACTURE OF HANDHELD JOINTED INSTRUMENTS | |
| US20060183076A1 (en) | Sterilizable lower mandibular tooth extraction forceps | |
| WO2019147567A1 (en) | Surgical instrument including flat and curved handle surfaces | |
| JP2017506135A (en) | Medical equipment |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23718034 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 202380096965.2 Country of ref document: CN |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: AU2023439649 Country of ref document: AU |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2023439649 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20230406 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 202380096965.2 Country of ref document: CN |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2023718034 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2023718034 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20251106 |