[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2023162729A1 - Iron source production method - Google Patents

Iron source production method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023162729A1
WO2023162729A1 PCT/JP2023/004640 JP2023004640W WO2023162729A1 WO 2023162729 A1 WO2023162729 A1 WO 2023162729A1 JP 2023004640 W JP2023004640 W JP 2023004640W WO 2023162729 A1 WO2023162729 A1 WO 2023162729A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
iron
reduced
phase
reduction
roasting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2023/004640
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
毅郎 足立
慎太郎 山崎
昌平 武田
卓 對馬
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP2022134387A external-priority patent/JP7775166B2/en
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Publication of WO2023162729A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023162729A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/04Removing impurities by adding a treating agent
    • C21C7/064Dephosphorising; Desulfurising
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/02Roasting processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B5/00General methods of reducing to metals
    • C22B5/02Dry methods smelting of sulfides or formation of mattes
    • C22B5/12Dry methods smelting of sulfides or formation of mattes by gases
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to a method for producing an iron source.
  • the present invention relates to a method for producing an iron source containing less phosphorus than iron ore as a raw material.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses iron ore that is put into a reduction furnace.
  • high-temperature furnace gas discharged from the reducing furnace is treated in a reduction roasting furnace.
  • Phosphorus is a component that lowers the grade of iron ore.
  • almost all of the phosphorus in the iron ore is transferred to hot metal in the blast furnace, and is generally removed in the subsequent hot metal pretreatment process and converter process.
  • the cost of removing phosphorus in these processes increases, and productivity decreases. Therefore, development of a technique for removing phosphorus from iron ore used for ironmaking is desired.
  • Patent Document 2 discloses a method for removing phosphorus from iron ore by wet treatment. Specifically, iron ore with a high phosphorus content is pulverized to 0.5 mm or less, water is added to make the pulp concentration about 35%, and H 2 SO 4 or HCl is added to the solvent and reacted at pH 2.0 or less to contain. Phosphorus minerals (mainly apatite) are decomposed and eluted, then magnetic substances such as magnetite are collected by magnetic separation, and non-magnetic substances such as SiO 2 or Al 2 O 3 are sedimented and separated as slime and eluted into the liquid.
  • Phosphorus minerals mainly apatite
  • magnetic substances such as magnetite are collected by magnetic separation
  • non-magnetic substances such as SiO 2 or Al 2 O 3 are sedimented and separated as slime and eluted into the liquid.
  • a method for treating P-containing iron ore is described in which slaked lime or quicklime is added to neutralize the P in the pH range of 5.0 to 10.0, and the P-containing iron ore is separated and recovered as calcium phosphate.
  • the method according to Patent Document 2 has a problem that it is difficult to ensure productivity because it is a wet process.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 proposes a process for separating P in iron ore by concentrating it in a dicalcium silicate (C 2 S) phase. Specifically, the basicity of the iron ore and the blending ratio of the carbonaceous material are adjusted. By adding CaO and heating at a high temperature, a dicalcium silicate phase (2CaO--SiO 2 , C 2 S) coexists in the molten slag as a solid phase, and a calcium phosphate phase (3CaO--P 2 O 5 , C 3 P ) as a solid solution (C 2 S—C 3 P solid solution).
  • a dicalcium silicate phase (2CaO--SiO 2 , C 2 S)
  • a calcium phosphate phase (3CaO---P 2 O 5 , C 3 P ) as a solid solution (C 2 S—C 3 P solid solution).
  • Patent Document 1 is effective when phosphorus is combined with elements other than iron, but there is a problem that it cannot be removed when phosphorus is combined with iron.
  • it is difficult to adjust the oxygen partial pressure due to the use of carbon material, etc., and therefore phosphorus is likely to be mixed in the iron phase, making it difficult to remove phosphorus. As a result, problems such as sulfur contamination and greenhouse gas emissions are raised.
  • the present disclosure has been made in view of the above problems, and its purpose is to sufficiently remove phosphorus even when phosphorus present in iron ore is bound to iron.
  • An object of the present invention is to realize a method for producing an iron source to be supplied.
  • Aspect 1 of the present invention is a preparation step of mixing iron ore containing phosphorus and raw materials containing flux to prepare a roasting mixture; a roasting step of roasting the roasting mixture to obtain a roasted product; a reduction step of reducing the roasted product in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase; a pulverization step of pulverizing the reduced material to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material from which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated; a sorting and recovering step of sorting and recovering the reduced iron phase-containing material from the pulverized material,
  • the reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less
  • the flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1
  • Aspect 2 of the present invention is The method for producing an iron source according to aspect 1, wherein the flux is one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO3 and Ca(OH) 2 .
  • Aspect 3 of the present invention is 3.
  • Aspect 4 of the present invention is 4. The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 3, wherein the atmosphere temperature in the reduction step is 850° C. or lower.
  • Aspect 5 of the present invention is according to any one of aspects 1 to 4, wherein in the preparation step, the iron ore and the flux are mixed so that the basicity CaO/SiO 2 of the roasting mixture is in the range of 1.0 to 5.0. is a method for producing an iron source.
  • Aspect 6 of the present invention is The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 5, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.
  • Aspect 7 of the present invention is 7.
  • Aspect 8 of the present invention is The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 7, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.
  • FIG. 1 is an image diagram schematically showing the steps of this embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope image of the sample after pulverization of Example 2.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the EDX analysis values of analysis points 1 and 2 in FIG.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing X-ray absorption edge spectra of samples in Examples.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between each reduction temperature and the phosphorus removal rate in Examples.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the iron reduction rate and the phosphorus removal rate after the reduction step in the example.
  • the method for manufacturing an iron source includes: a preparation step of mixing iron ore containing phosphorus and raw materials containing flux to prepare a roasting mixture; a roasting step of roasting the roasting mixture to obtain a roasted product; a reduction step of reducing the roasted product in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase; a pulverization step of pulverizing the reduced material to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material from which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated; a sorting and recovering step of sorting and recovering the reduced iron phase-containing material from the pulverized material,
  • the reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less
  • the flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 Including above.
  • the roasting step of performing oxidative roasting of the roasting mixture containing flux and iron ore, and the atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas are controlled to perform reduction. It is separated from the reduction process. As a result, the phosphorus bound to iron in the iron ore is transferred to the slag phase (components other than iron, impurity phase) formed by the roasting of the flux (oxidizing roasting) to bond with the slag components, and Through the above-mentioned reduction process, iron oxide is reduced while phosphorus is fixed to the slag component, and the phosphorus and iron phases can be chemically separated. It has been found that iron phase inclusions are obtained.
  • phosphorus and slag components are bonded, specifically, for example, a composite oxide of phosphorus and calcium oxide (the composite oxide is Ca 2 P 2 O 7 ), it is considered that phosphorus in the iron ore can be sufficiently removed by trapping phosphorus.
  • FIG. 1 is an image diagram schematically showing each step of the manufacturing method according to this embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is only an image diagram and does not limit the present disclosure.
  • phosphorus is not completely transferred to the slag phase by roasting, or when the slag phase and reduced iron phase are not completely separated by pulverization, and part of the slag phase remains bound to the reduced iron phase.
  • the manufacturing method according to the present embodiment can also include these aspects.
  • a torrefaction mixture is prepared by mixing phosphorus-containing iron ore and flux-containing raw materials. By mixing these, a roasting mixture of iron ore 11 and flux 12 is obtained as shown in FIG. 1A.
  • the flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 Including above.
  • alkaline earth metal oxides and the like are compounds that easily combine with phosphorus.
  • the above compounds of alkali metals include Na2O , K2O , Li2CO3 , Na2CO3 , K2CO3 , NaOH, KOH and the like.
  • CaO (quicklime), CaCO3 (limestone), Ca(OH) 2 (slaked lime), etc. are mentioned as said compound of an alkaline-earth metal.
  • the flux is one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO3 and Ca(OH) 2 .
  • CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 are preferred because they easily bond with phosphorus and are easily industrially available.
  • SiO 2 in iron ore together the aforementioned composite oxide of phosphorus and calcium oxide can be easily formed, and phosphorus can be easily fixed.
  • CaCO 3 which is widely used industrially, is more preferable.
  • the flux is selected from the group consisting of the alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates mentioned above and the alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates It may be a mixture of one or more fluxes and other fluxes.
  • Other fluxes include, for example, soda-based flux, CaF 2 , CaCl 2 , Li 2 CO 3 -based flux, BaCO 3 -based flux, and the like.
  • the size of the flux may be any size generally used in industry.
  • the phosphorus-containing iron ore may contain, for example, 0.05% by mass or more of phosphorus. According to the present embodiment, phosphorus can be sufficiently reduced even when the amount of phosphorus in the iron ore is as high as 0.10% by mass or more, furthermore 0.15% by mass or more.
  • the iron ore may be pulverized, classified, or the like before being mixed with the flux to make the size uniform.
  • the flux is preferably one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 , more preferably one of CaO and CaCO 3
  • the above may be mixed so as to be within the above basicity range.
  • the flux is preferably one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 , more preferably one of CaO and CaCO 3
  • the above and other above-described fluxes may be mixed so that the basicity is within the above range.
  • CaO/SiO 2 is more preferably 3.0 or less.
  • the above iron ore and flux should be mixed by an industrially used method. If necessary, a medium such as water may be further added to the iron ore and flux to form granules as a roasting mixture.
  • roasting step the roasting mixture is roasted to obtain the roasted product shown in B of FIG.
  • the roasting process represented by the arrow a from A to B in FIG.
  • the phosphorus in the iron ore 11 migrates to the slag phase (impurity phase mainly composed of components other than iron, hereinafter referred to as the “roasted slag phase”) 14 formed by roasting the flux, and the roasted slag It is believed to bond with phase 14 .
  • the roasting temperature it is preferable to set the roasting temperature to 1150° C. or higher at which at least a part of the mixture can be melted. Said temperature may even be 1200° C. or higher.
  • the upper limit of the roasting temperature is not particularly limited from the viewpoint of transferring phosphorus from the iron ore to the slag phase.
  • the upper limit of the temperature may be set to about 1500° C. from the viewpoint of suppressing deterioration of equipment.
  • the roasting temperature refers to the temperature in the packed layer of the mixture of iron ore and flux, and this temperature was controlled by the atmospheric temperature of the furnace used in the examples described later.
  • the roasting atmosphere in the present embodiment refers to an atmosphere in which the reduction rate of iron oxide due to roasting (referred to as the "iron reduction rate” in this specification) is 10% or less.
  • the reduction of iron oxide is suppressed in the roasting stage, the roasting process and the reduction process are separated, and iron oxide is reduced in the reduction process, so that It is possible to separate phosphorus from the original iron phase (hereinafter simply referred to as "iron phase") and prevent phosphorus from being mixed into the iron phase.
  • the reduction rate is preferably 8% or less, more preferably 5% or less, and may be 0%.
  • Means for achieving the above reduction rate include the above-described atmosphere control, temperature control, and the like.
  • the atmosphere includes an oxygen-containing atmosphere.
  • it can be an air atmosphere.
  • a carbonaceous material as a heat source, and when this carbonaceous material is used, the atmosphere may be somewhat reducing than the atmospheric atmosphere, but such an atmosphere is also acceptable.
  • equipment for roasting for example, an electric resistance furnace (external heating), a burner-type heating furnace, a Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine, a pot-type sintering machine, or the like can be used.
  • the roasted product is reduced in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product shown in C of FIG. 1, that is, a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase.
  • a reduced product is obtained in which the roasted slag phase 14 is formed with the slag phase after undergoing this reduction step.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 uses a carbonaceous material, but if such a carbonaceous material is used, the oxygen partial pressure may locally decrease around the carbonaceous material during reduction, and the carbonaceous material may be heated. This is because unpredictable consumption of oxygen such as CO gas and CO 2 gas occurs.
  • a gaseous reducing agent such as CO gas or hydrogen gas
  • CO gas or hydrogen gas it is possible to suppress fluctuations in the oxygen partial pressure during reduction, and the reduction in the oxygen partial pressure makes it possible to separate phosphorus from iron. It is believed that the binding can be prevented so that the phosphorus can be kept chemically separated.
  • the gas that constitutes the atmosphere in the reduction step should contain at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas, and the remaining gas components are not particularly limited. Since the purpose is reduction, the remaining gas components are preferably gases having no oxidizing action.
  • the remaining gas components include, for example, CO 2 gas, N 2 gas, and the like.
  • CO gas alone or a mixed gas of CO gas and hydrogen gas is used as the reducing gas, but the reducing gas may be only hydrogen gas. It may be N2 gas.
  • the use of hydrogen as the reducing gas contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gases compared to the case of using carbon material as the reducing agent as in Non-Patent Document 1.
  • a reduced iron phase 16 mainly composed of Fe (metallic iron) or Fe 3 O 4 is obtained. That is, by the above-described oxidizing roasting and reduction steps, the phosphorus fixed in the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 that are chemically sufficiently separated can be obtained.
  • the reduced iron phase includes M.I. It can contain not only Fe (metallic iron), but also FeO, in addition to the above Fe 3 O 4 obtained by reduction of Fe 2 O 3 .
  • the reduced iron phase may also contain impurities such as oxides of elements other than iron.
  • the atmospheric temperature in the reduction process can be, for example, in the range of 600°C or higher and 900°C or lower.
  • the ambient temperature in the reduction step refers to the ambient temperature in the furnace for reduction.
  • the ambient temperature in the reduction step is 850° C. or lower.
  • signs of Fe—P phase formation were observed. From this, it is considered that if the temperature during reduction is too high, the phosphorus that migrates to the slag phase (impurity phase) in the roasting process and is fixed may bond with the iron phase again.
  • the lower limit of the atmospheric temperature in the reduction step is preferably 650° C. or higher from the viewpoint of promoting the reduction.
  • the reduction time can be appropriately determined according to the throughput.
  • the cooling to room temperature may be performed in a non-oxidizing atmosphere, and is not limited to a reducing gas atmosphere.
  • a non-oxidizing atmosphere for example, an atmosphere of N 2 gas or other inert gas such as Ar may be used.
  • the reduction rate of iron oxide after reduction in the reduction step (referred to in this specification as "iron reduction rate”) is preferably 50% or more.
  • iron reduction rate is more preferably 70% or higher, still more preferably 80% or higher, still more preferably 90% or higher, and most preferably 100%.
  • the reduction rate is determined by the method described in Examples below.
  • the reduced material is pulverized to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material in which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated.
  • the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 are separated by the impact of the pulverization, as shown in D of FIG.
  • Phosphorus is physically separated by this pulverization and the following sorting and recovery.
  • the reductant is composed of substances with different grinding properties, such as metals and oxides, and heterophase interfaces can be formed.
  • FIG. 1 is an image diagram, and in addition to the complete separation of the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 as shown in FIG. It can also include cases.
  • the reduced iron phase 16 completely separated from the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 in which a part of the reduced slag phase 17 remains are collectively referred to as "reduced iron phase inclusions". Pulverization is performed using pulverization equipment such as a cage mill, ball mill, rotary mill and jet mill.
  • a cage mill to pulverize the reduced product.
  • the force that causes cracks at the interface between the reduced iron phase and the slag phase is thought to act more efficiently than, for example, in pulverization by a grinding-type ball mill.
  • the reduced iron phase-containing material is sorted and recovered from the pulverized material.
  • a reduced iron phase-containing material (in E of FIG. 1, only the reduced iron phase 16 is shown as an example) is obtained by the sorting and recovery step represented by the arrow d from D to E in FIG. Since metallic iron has magnetism, magnetic separation (magnetic separation) can be used as a method for sorting and recovering. Magnetic separation becomes possible because the iron phase becomes magnetized by the reduction in the previous stage. Magnetic separation is known to have higher separation efficiency than gravity separation.
  • the reduced iron phase is mainly Fe 3 O 4
  • the effect of promoting pulverization due to the formation of the interface between different phases is not sufficient, but Fe 3 O 4 is also combined with metallic iron. Since it also has magnetism, magnetic selection can be used, and such aspects can also be included in the present embodiment.
  • the reduced iron phase-containing material may be subjected to further steps to obtain an iron source.
  • the method of magnetic separation is not particularly limited as long as it is possible to separate the reduced iron phase and the reduced slag phase. You may use a large-sized magnetic separator, such as.
  • roasting process A resistance electric heating furnace was used for roasting.
  • the above roasting mixture is placed in a dense MgO container manufactured by Nikkato Co., Ltd., heated to 1300 ° C. (atmospheric temperature in the furnace) at a heating rate of 10 ° C./min in an air atmosphere, and then heated to 1300 ° C. for 30 minutes. held for a minute. Then, it was cooled to room temperature to obtain a roasted sample.
  • the chemical composition of the roasted samples was analyzed as follows. T. The amount of Fe (total iron) was measured by titanium (III) chloride reduction potassium dichromate titration method, and the amount of FeO was measured by potassium dichromate titration method. The amount of Fe (metallic iron) was determined by the bromine-methanol decomposition-EDTA titration method. Also, phosphorus was quantified according to JIS M8216 (absorption photometry). Note that FeO, M.I. When Fe was below the detection limit of 0.10% by mass, it was defined as 0.10%.
  • (FeO%), (T.Fe%), and (M.Fe%) are FeO, T.E after each step (after roasting in Table 2, after reduction in Table 3 below). Fe, M. Each mass % of Fe is shown.
  • a cage mill manufactured by Masuno Seisakusho Co., Ltd. or a ball mill manufactured by Yoshida Seisakusho Co., Ltd. was used to pulverize the reduced sample.
  • the number of revolutions was 2850 rpm.
  • the amount supplied to the cage mill at one time was 200 g, and the sample after pulverization by the cage mill was supplied to the cage mill again, and the entire amount of the sample was processed so that it passed through the cage mill three times in total to obtain a pulverized sample.
  • steel balls were filled as grinding balls, and the powder was ground by driving at a rotation speed of 68 rpm for 60 seconds.
  • the amount of sample supplied was 140 g.
  • Magnetic separation process As a method for sorting and collecting, magnetic separation was performed to obtain a reduced iron phase-containing material. Magnetic separation was carried out by inserting the pulverized sample into a dry drum magnetic separator. The rotational speed of the dry drum magnetic separator was set to 80 rpm. The amount of pulverized material supplied to the dry drum magnetic separator was set to 50 g/time, and the process was carried out twice. Then, the magnetization rate was measured and the chemical components (T. Fe and P) were analyzed for each time (N1, N2). The magnetization ratio was obtained from the following formula. Also, the chemical components were obtained in the same manner as the chemical component analysis of the roasted sample. Table 4 shows the results.
  • Example 2 The sample pulverized after roasting and reduction in Example 2 was embedded in resin, cross-sectionally polished, and then observed with a scanning electron microscope. The results are shown in FIG. Further, the components at the analysis points indicated by reference numerals 1 and 2 in FIG. 2 were analyzed by EDX (energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy). The results are shown in FIG. The EDX semi-quantitative analysis values in FIG. 3 were calculated from the amount of each element other than oxygen, assuming that each element forms an oxide shown in the legend of FIG.
  • the spectral shoulder near 2145-2150 eV indicated by arrow Q in FIG. 4 indicates that phosphorus forms iron phosphate in iron ore before roasting.
  • the absorption of the band indicated by the arrow Q disappears, and the bond close to Ca 2 P 2 O 7 indicated by the solid line peak In other words, phosphorus is fixed to Ca.
  • FIG. 6 shows a graph that summarizes the relationship between the iron reduction rate after the reduction process and the phosphorus removal rate. From this FIG. 6, if the iron reduction rate after the reduction step is preferably 50% or more, the phosphorus removal rate can be increased, and it is possible to achieve a higher phosphorus removal rate of about 20% or more. I understand. This is because, as mentioned above, the rate of reduction is increased by reduction, and the ratio of the reduced iron phase, which has different pulverization characteristics from the reduced slag phase containing phosphorus, increases, resulting in a reduced product with many metal-oxide interfaces.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A method for producing an iron source, comprising: a preparation step in which a mixture for roasting is prepared by mixing a raw material containing a phosphorus-containing iron ore and a flux; a roasting step in which the mixture for roasting is roasted to obtain a roasted product; a reduction step in which the roasted product is reduced in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas, to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase; a crushing step in which the reduced product is crushed to obtain a crushed product containing a reduced-iron-phase-containing product in which at least some of the slag phase constituting the reduced product has been separated; and a separation and recovery step in which the reduced-iron-phase-containing product is separated and recovered from the crushed product. In the method for producing an iron source, the reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less, and the flux is a defined compound.

Description

鉄源の製造方法Iron source manufacturing method

 本開示は鉄源の製造方法に関する。特には、原料の鉄鉱石よりもリン量の抑えられた鉄源の製造方法に関する。 This disclosure relates to a method for producing an iron source. In particular, the present invention relates to a method for producing an iron source containing less phosphorus than iron ore as a raw material.

 近年、良質鉄源の枯渇に伴い、鉄鋼製品の原料として、脈石等の不純物の少ない鉄鉱石を入手することは困難となりつつあり、鉄鉱石の不純物は今後上昇することが見込まれる。脈石を多く含む低品位の鉄鉱石を、直接製鉄法に供するための高品位の鉄鉱石に改質するための事前処理方法として、例えば特許文献1には、還元炉内に投入される鉄鉱石を、炭化水素を含む燃料から発生する還元ガスで還元し銑鉄製造工程を経ずに直接に製鉄原料を得る直接製鉄法において、前記還元炉から排出される高温の炉ガスを還元焙焼炉に導入しこの炉ガス内に残存する還元成分で貯鉱場から供給されるヘマタイト鉱石を還元焙焼してマグネタイト鉱石にする工程と、このマグネタイト鉱石を磁力選別に適する粒径にまで粉砕し磁力選別機で磁力選別する工程と、磁力選別で得られたマグネタイト精鉱を塊状化して焼成しペレットにしてから前記還元炉に供給する工程とから成る方法が記載されている。 In recent years, due to the depletion of high-quality iron sources, it is becoming difficult to obtain iron ore with few impurities such as gangue as a raw material for steel products, and iron ore impurities are expected to increase in the future. As a pretreatment method for reforming low-grade iron ore containing a large amount of gangue into high-grade iron ore for direct ironmaking, for example, Patent Document 1 discloses iron ore that is put into a reduction furnace. In the direct ironmaking method in which stone is reduced with a reducing gas generated from fuel containing hydrocarbons to directly obtain raw materials for ironmaking without going through a pig iron manufacturing process, high-temperature furnace gas discharged from the reducing furnace is treated in a reduction roasting furnace. a step of reducing and roasting the hematite ore supplied from the ore storage site with the reducing components remaining in the furnace gas to make magnetite ore; It describes a method comprising the steps of: magnetically sorting with a sorter; and agglomerating the magnetite concentrate obtained by the magnetic sorting, calcining it into pellets, and supplying it to the reduction furnace.

 鉄鉱石の品位を低下させる成分として特にリンが挙げられる。既存の高炉-転炉法では、鉄鉱石中のリンは高炉でほぼ全量が溶銑に移行し、その後の溶銑予備処理工程と転炉工程での除去が一般的である。しかし原料である鉄鉱石中のリン量が増加すると、これらの工程でのリン除去のコストが増加し、生産性が低下する。よって、製鉄に供する鉄鉱石のリン除去技術の開発が望まれている。 Phosphorus is a component that lowers the grade of iron ore. In the existing blast furnace-converter furnace process, almost all of the phosphorus in the iron ore is transferred to hot metal in the blast furnace, and is generally removed in the subsequent hot metal pretreatment process and converter process. However, if the amount of phosphorus in iron ore, which is a raw material, increases, the cost of removing phosphorus in these processes increases, and productivity decreases. Therefore, development of a technique for removing phosphorus from iron ore used for ironmaking is desired.

 例えば特許文献2には、湿式処理により鉄鉱石のリンを除去する方法が示されている。詳細には、燐分の高い鉄鉱石を0.5mm以下に粉砕しこれに水を加えてパルプ濃度35%前後とし、溶剤にHSO又はHCIを添加しpH2.0以下で反応させ含有している燐鉱物(主として燐灰石)を分解溶出させ、次いで磁力選別により磁鉄鉱等の磁着物を採取し非磁着物たるSiO、又はAl等をスライムとして沈降分離すると共に液中に溶出したPは消石灰又は生石灰を添加しpH5.0~10.0の範囲中で中和し燐酸カルシウムとして分離回収することを特徴とするP含有鉄鉱石の処理方法が記載されている。しかし特許文献2による方法では、湿式処理であるが故に、生産性を確保することが難しいという問題がある。 For example, Patent Document 2 discloses a method for removing phosphorus from iron ore by wet treatment. Specifically, iron ore with a high phosphorus content is pulverized to 0.5 mm or less, water is added to make the pulp concentration about 35%, and H 2 SO 4 or HCl is added to the solvent and reacted at pH 2.0 or less to contain. Phosphorus minerals (mainly apatite) are decomposed and eluted, then magnetic substances such as magnetite are collected by magnetic separation, and non-magnetic substances such as SiO 2 or Al 2 O 3 are sedimented and separated as slime and eluted into the liquid. A method for treating P-containing iron ore is described in which slaked lime or quicklime is added to neutralize the P in the pH range of 5.0 to 10.0, and the P-containing iron ore is separated and recovered as calcium phosphate. However, the method according to Patent Document 2 has a problem that it is difficult to ensure productivity because it is a wet process.

 一方、乾式プロセスにより、鉄鉱石中のリンを除去する方法も提案されている。例えば、非特許文献1には、鉄鉱石中のPをダイカルシウムシリケート(CS)相に濃化することで、分離するプロセスが提案されている。詳細には、鉄鉱石の塩基度および炭材の配合比を調整、特に前記塩基度について、粉鉱石に含まれるSiOを基準に、塩基度(C/S)が2.0になる量のCaOを添加し、高温で加熱することで、溶融スラグ中にダイカルシウムシリケート相(2CaO-SiO,CS)が固相として共存し,リン酸カルシウム相(3CaO-P,CP)との固溶体(CS-CP固溶体)としてPが濃化することが示されている。 On the other hand, a dry process has also been proposed to remove phosphorus from iron ore. For example, Non-Patent Document 1 proposes a process for separating P in iron ore by concentrating it in a dicalcium silicate (C 2 S) phase. Specifically, the basicity of the iron ore and the blending ratio of the carbonaceous material are adjusted. By adding CaO and heating at a high temperature, a dicalcium silicate phase (2CaO--SiO 2 , C 2 S) coexists in the molten slag as a solid phase, and a calcium phosphate phase (3CaO--P 2 O 5 , C 3 P ) as a solid solution (C 2 S—C 3 P solid solution).

特開昭53-103915号公報JP-A-53-103915 特開昭60-261501号公報JP-A-60-261501

丸岡 伸洋ら,「部分還元処理による鉄鉱石中りんのダイカルシウムシリケート相への濃化」,鉄と鋼,Vol.107(2021),No.6,pp.527-533Nobuhiro Maruoka et al., "Concentration of phosphorus in iron ore to dicalcium silicate phase by partial reduction treatment", Tetsu to Hagane, Vol. 107 (2021), No. 6, pp. 527-533

 特許文献1の方法ではリンが鉄以外の元素等と結びついている場合は有効であるが、リンが鉄と結びついている場合は除去し得ないという問題がある。また非特許文献1の方法では、炭材の使用等により酸素分圧の調整が困難となり、それ故に鉄相にリンが混入しやすく、リンの除去が困難となりうること、また炭材の使用に起因して、硫黄分の混入、温室効果ガスの排出といった問題が挙げられる。 The method of Patent Document 1 is effective when phosphorus is combined with elements other than iron, but there is a problem that it cannot be removed when phosphorus is combined with iron. In addition, in the method of Non-Patent Document 1, it is difficult to adjust the oxygen partial pressure due to the use of carbon material, etc., and therefore phosphorus is likely to be mixed in the iron phase, making it difficult to remove phosphorus. As a result, problems such as sulfur contamination and greenhouse gas emissions are raised.

 本開示は、上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであって、その目的は、鉄鉱石中に存在するリンが鉄と結合している場合であっても、リンを十分に除去できる、製鉄等に供する鉄源の製造方法を実現することにある。 The present disclosure has been made in view of the above problems, and its purpose is to sufficiently remove phosphorus even when phosphorus present in iron ore is bound to iron. An object of the present invention is to realize a method for producing an iron source to be supplied.

 本発明の態様1は、
 リンを含有する鉄鉱石とフラックスを含む原料を混合して、焙焼用混合物を準備する準備工程と、
 前記焙焼用混合物を焙焼して焙焼物を得る焙焼工程と、
 前記焙焼物を、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含む雰囲気で還元して、還元鉄相とスラグ相を含む還元物を得る還元工程と、
 前記還元物を粉砕して、還元物を構成するスラグ相の少なくとも一部が分離した還元鉄相含有物を含む粉砕物を得る粉砕工程と、
 前記粉砕物から前記還元鉄相含有物を選別回収する選別回収工程と、を含み、
 前記焙焼による鉄の還元率は10%以下であり、
 前記フラックスは、アルカリ金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物、ならびにアルカリ土類金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物よりなる群から選択される1以上を含む、鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 1 of the present invention is
a preparation step of mixing iron ore containing phosphorus and raw materials containing flux to prepare a roasting mixture;
a roasting step of roasting the roasting mixture to obtain a roasted product;
a reduction step of reducing the roasted product in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase;
a pulverization step of pulverizing the reduced material to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material from which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated;
a sorting and recovering step of sorting and recovering the reduced iron phase-containing material from the pulverized material,
The reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less,
The flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 A method for producing an iron source including the above.

 本発明の態様2は、
 前記フラックスはCaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)よりなる群から選択される1以上である、態様1に記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 2 of the present invention is
The method for producing an iron source according to aspect 1, wherein the flux is one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO3 and Ca(OH) 2 .

 本発明の態様3は、
 前記選別回収工程で、選別回収する方法として磁力選別を行う、態様1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 3 of the present invention is
3. The method for producing an iron source according to aspect 1 or 2, wherein magnetic separation is performed as a method of sorting and recovering in the sorting and recovering step.

 本発明の態様4は、
 前記還元工程の雰囲気温度を850℃以下とする、態様1~3のいずれかに記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 4 of the present invention is
4. The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 3, wherein the atmosphere temperature in the reduction step is 850° C. or lower.

 本発明の態様5は、
 前記準備工程で、前記焙焼用混合物の塩基度CaO/SiOが1.0~5.0の範囲となるように、前記鉄鉱石とフラックスを混合する、態様1~4のいずれかに記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 5 of the present invention is
According to any one of aspects 1 to 4, wherein in the preparation step, the iron ore and the flux are mixed so that the basicity CaO/SiO 2 of the roasting mixture is in the range of 1.0 to 5.0. is a method for producing an iron source.

 本発明の態様6は、
 前記還元工程後の鉄の還元率は50%以上である、態様1~5のいずれかに記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 6 of the present invention is
The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 5, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.

 本発明の態様7は、
 前記粉砕工程で、ケージミルを用いて前記還元物を粉砕する、態様1~6のいずれかに記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 7 of the present invention is
7. The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 6, wherein in the pulverization step, the reduced product is pulverized using a cage mill.

 本発明の態様8は、
 前記還元工程後の鉄の還元率は50%以上である、態様1~7のいずれかに記載の鉄源の製造方法である。
Aspect 8 of the present invention is
The method for producing an iron source according to any one of aspects 1 to 7, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.

 本開示によれば、鉄鉱石中に存在するリンが鉄と結合している場合であっても、リンを十分に除去できる、製鉄等に供する鉄源の製造方法を提供できる。 According to the present disclosure, it is possible to provide a method for producing an iron source for ironmaking or the like, which can sufficiently remove phosphorus even when phosphorus present in iron ore is bound to iron.

図1は、本実施形態の工程を模式的に示したイメージ図である。FIG. 1 is an image diagram schematically showing the steps of this embodiment. 図2は、実施例2の粉砕後のサンプルの走査型電子顕微鏡像である。FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope image of the sample after pulverization of Example 2. FIG. 図3は、前記図2の符号1、2の分析点のEDX分析値を示す図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the EDX analysis values of analysis points 1 and 2 in FIG. 図4は、実施例におけるサンプルのX線吸収端スペクトルを示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing X-ray absorption edge spectra of samples in Examples. 図5は、実施例における各還元温度とリン除去率の関係を示すグラフである。FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between each reduction temperature and the phosphorus removal rate in Examples. 図6は、実施例における還元工程後の鉄の還元率とリン除去率の関係を示すグラフである。FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the iron reduction rate and the phosphorus removal rate after the reduction step in the example.

 本実施形態に係る鉄源の製造方法は、
 リンを含有する鉄鉱石とフラックスを含む原料を混合して、焙焼用混合物を準備する準備工程と、
 前記焙焼用混合物を焙焼して焙焼物を得る焙焼工程と、
 前記焙焼物を、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含む雰囲気で還元して、還元鉄相とスラグ相を含む還元物を得る還元工程と、
 前記還元物を粉砕して、還元物を構成するスラグ相の少なくとも一部が分離した還元鉄相含有物を含む粉砕物を得る粉砕工程と、
 前記粉砕物から前記還元鉄相含有物を選別回収する選別回収工程と、を含み、
 前記焙焼による鉄の還元率は10%以下であり、
 前記フラックスは、アルカリ金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物、ならびにアルカリ土類金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物よりなる群から選択される1以上を含む。
The method for manufacturing an iron source according to this embodiment includes:
a preparation step of mixing iron ore containing phosphorus and raw materials containing flux to prepare a roasting mixture;
a roasting step of roasting the roasting mixture to obtain a roasted product;
a reduction step of reducing the roasted product in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase;
a pulverization step of pulverizing the reduced material to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material from which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated;
a sorting and recovering step of sorting and recovering the reduced iron phase-containing material from the pulverized material,
The reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less,
The flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 Including above.

 本実施形態の製造方法によれば、フラックスと鉄鉱石を含む焙焼用混合物の酸化焙焼を行う焙焼工程と、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含む雰囲気に制御して還元を行う還元工程とを分けている。その結果、鉄鉱石中の鉄と結びついたリンを、フラックスの焙焼(酸化焙焼)により形成されたスラグ相(鉄以外の成分、不純物相)側に移行させてスラグ成分と結合させ、かつ上記還元工程を経ることで、リンをスラグ成分に固定したまま酸化鉄の還元が行われ、リンと鉄相との化学的な分離を実現でき、その後の粉砕と選別回収により、鉄源として還元鉄相含有物が得られることを見出した。本実施形態では、後述する実施例でのリンの化学結合状態の評価の通り、リンとスラグ成分が結合し、具体的に例えば、リンと酸化カルシウムの複合酸化物(該複合酸化物は、Caに近い結合状態であると考えられる)として、リンが捕捉されることで、鉄鉱石中のリンを十分に除去できると考えられる。 According to the production method of the present embodiment, the roasting step of performing oxidative roasting of the roasting mixture containing flux and iron ore, and the atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas are controlled to perform reduction. It is separated from the reduction process. As a result, the phosphorus bound to iron in the iron ore is transferred to the slag phase (components other than iron, impurity phase) formed by the roasting of the flux (oxidizing roasting) to bond with the slag components, and Through the above-mentioned reduction process, iron oxide is reduced while phosphorus is fixed to the slag component, and the phosphorus and iron phases can be chemically separated. It has been found that iron phase inclusions are obtained. In this embodiment, as the evaluation of the chemical bonding state of phosphorus in the examples described later, phosphorus and slag components are bonded, specifically, for example, a composite oxide of phosphorus and calcium oxide (the composite oxide is Ca 2 P 2 O 7 ), it is considered that phosphorus in the iron ore can be sufficiently removed by trapping phosphorus.

 以下、本実施形態に係る製造方法の各工程について詳述する。図1は、本実施形態に係る製造方法の各工程を模式的に示したイメージ図である。以下の各工程の説明では、図1に基づいて説明する場合があるが、図1は、あくまでもイメージ図であって本開示を限定するものではない。例えば、焙焼によりリンがスラグ相側に完全に移行しない場合や、粉砕により、スラグ相と還元鉄相とが完全に分離せず、還元鉄相にスラグ相の一部が結合したままの場合がありうるが、この様な態様は当然に許容され、本実施形態に係る製造方法はこれらの態様についても含みうる。 Each step of the manufacturing method according to this embodiment will be described in detail below. FIG. 1 is an image diagram schematically showing each step of the manufacturing method according to this embodiment. In the following description of each process, there are cases where the description is based on FIG. 1, but FIG. 1 is only an image diagram and does not limit the present disclosure. For example, when phosphorus is not completely transferred to the slag phase by roasting, or when the slag phase and reduced iron phase are not completely separated by pulverization, and part of the slag phase remains bound to the reduced iron phase. However, such aspects are of course allowed, and the manufacturing method according to the present embodiment can also include these aspects.

 [準備工程]
 リンを含有する鉄鉱石とフラックスを含む原料を混合して、焙焼用混合物を準備する。これらの混合により、図1のAに示す通り、鉄鉱石11とフラックス12の焙焼用混合物が得られる。
[Preparation process]
A torrefaction mixture is prepared by mixing phosphorus-containing iron ore and flux-containing raw materials. By mixing these, a roasting mixture of iron ore 11 and flux 12 is obtained as shown in FIG. 1A.

 前記フラックスは、アルカリ金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物、ならびにアルカリ土類金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物よりなる群から選択される1以上を含む。これらアルカリ土類金属の酸化物等は、リンと結びつきやすい化合物である。アルカリ金属の上記化合物として、NaO、KO、LiCO、NaCO、KCO、NaOH、KOHなどが挙げられる。また、アルカリ土類金属の上記化合物として、CaO(生石灰)、CaCO(石灰石)およびCa(OH)(消石灰)などが挙げられる。前記フラックスはCaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)よりなる群から選択される1以上であることが好ましい。CaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)はリンと結合しやすく、工業的に利用し易いため好ましい。また、鉄鉱石中のSiOを併せて利用することで、先述のリンと酸化カルシウムの複合酸化物を容易に形成でき、リンを容易に固定することができる。より好ましくは、工業的に汎用されているCaCOである。フラックスは、上述したアルカリ金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物、ならびにアルカリ土類金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物よりなる群から選択される1以上と、それ以外のフラックスとの混合物であってもよい。それ以外のフラックスとして、例えばソーダ系フラックス、CaF、CaCl、LiCO系フラックス、BaCO系フラックスなどが挙げられる。フラックスのサイズは、一般的に工業で使用されるサイズであればよい。 The flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 Including above. These alkaline earth metal oxides and the like are compounds that easily combine with phosphorus. The above compounds of alkali metals include Na2O , K2O , Li2CO3 , Na2CO3 , K2CO3 , NaOH, KOH and the like. Moreover, CaO (quicklime), CaCO3 (limestone), Ca(OH) 2 (slaked lime), etc. are mentioned as said compound of an alkaline-earth metal. Preferably, the flux is one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO3 and Ca(OH) 2 . CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 are preferred because they easily bond with phosphorus and are easily industrially available. In addition, by using SiO 2 in iron ore together, the aforementioned composite oxide of phosphorus and calcium oxide can be easily formed, and phosphorus can be easily fixed. CaCO 3 , which is widely used industrially, is more preferable. The flux is selected from the group consisting of the alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates mentioned above and the alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates It may be a mixture of one or more fluxes and other fluxes. Other fluxes include, for example, soda-based flux, CaF 2 , CaCl 2 , Li 2 CO 3 -based flux, BaCO 3 -based flux, and the like. The size of the flux may be any size generally used in industry.

 前記リンを含有する鉄鉱石は、リンを例えば0.05質量%以上含みうる。本実施形態によれば、鉄鉱石中のリン量が更には0.10質量%以上、より更には0.15質量%以上と多い場合であってもリンを十分低減できる。前記鉄鉱石は、フラックスと混合前に、粉砕、分級する等して、サイズの均一化を図ってもよい。 The phosphorus-containing iron ore may contain, for example, 0.05% by mass or more of phosphorus. According to the present embodiment, phosphorus can be sufficiently reduced even when the amount of phosphorus in the iron ore is as high as 0.10% by mass or more, furthermore 0.15% by mass or more. The iron ore may be pulverized, classified, or the like before being mixed with the flux to make the size uniform.

 前記焙焼用混合物の塩基度CaO/SiOが1.0~5.0の範囲となるように、前記鉄鉱石とフラックスを混合することが好ましい。例えば、鉄鉱石に含まれるSiO量に応じて、フラックスとして、好ましくはCaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)よりなる群から選択される1以上、より好ましくはCaOとCaCOのうちの1以上を、上記塩基度の範囲内となるように混合することが挙げられる。または、鉄鉱石に含まれるSiO量に応じて、フラックスとして、好ましくはCaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)よりなる群から選択される1以上、より好ましくはCaOとCaCOのうちの1以上と、それ以外の上述したフラックスとを、上記塩基度の範囲内となるように混合することが挙げられる。焙焼用混合物の塩基度を上記範囲とすることで、Caに近いリンと酸化カルシウムの複合酸化物を容易に形成できる。CaO/SiOはより好ましくは3.0以下である。上記塩基度CaO/SiOを計算する場合、CaO以外のCa含有化合物はCaOに換算して求める。フラックスに含まれる、例えばCaO以外のCaCOやCa(OH)などのCa含有化合物も加熱により分解してCaOとなるためである。 It is preferable to mix the iron ore and the flux so that the basicity CaO/SiO 2 of the roasting mixture is in the range of 1.0 to 5.0. For example, depending on the amount of SiO 2 contained in the iron ore, the flux is preferably one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 , more preferably one of CaO and CaCO 3 The above may be mixed so as to be within the above basicity range. Alternatively, depending on the amount of SiO 2 contained in the iron ore, the flux is preferably one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 , more preferably one of CaO and CaCO 3 For example, the above and other above-described fluxes may be mixed so that the basicity is within the above range. By setting the basicity of the roasting mixture within the above range, a composite oxide of phosphorus and calcium oxide that is close to Ca 2 P 2 O 7 can be easily formed. CaO/SiO 2 is more preferably 3.0 or less. When calculating the above basicity CaO/SiO 2 , Ca-containing compounds other than CaO are calculated by converting them into CaO. This is because Ca-containing compounds other than CaO, such as CaCO 3 and Ca(OH) 2 , contained in the flux are decomposed by heating to become CaO.

 上記鉄鉱石とフラックスは、工業的に用いられている方法で混合すればよい。必要に応じて、上記鉄鉱石とフラックスに更に例えば水等の媒体を加え、焙焼用混合物として造粒物を形成してもよい。 The above iron ore and flux should be mixed by an industrially used method. If necessary, a medium such as water may be further added to the iron ore and flux to form granules as a roasting mixture.

 [焙焼工程]
 焙焼工程では、前記焙焼用混合物を焙焼して、図1のBに示す焙焼物を得る。図1のAからBへの矢印aで表される焙焼工程で、鉄分と結びついたリンを含む鉄鉱石11をフラックス12とともに焙焼(酸化焙焼)することによって、リンの移行15、詳細には鉄鉱石11中のリンが、フラックスの焙焼により形成されたスラグ相(鉄分以外の成分を主成分とする不純物相、以下「焙焼スラグ相」という)14へ移行し、焙焼スラグ相14と結合すると考えられる。該作用効果を発揮させるには、焙焼の温度を、混合物の少なくとも一部が溶融しうる1150℃以上とすることが好ましい。前記温度は更には1200℃以上であってもよい。焙焼の温度の上限は、リンを鉄鉱石からスラグ相側に移行させる観点からは特に限定されない。例えば設備の劣化抑制等の観点から、温度の上限を1500℃程度としてもよい。なお、上記焙焼の温度とは、鉄鉱石とフラックスの混合物の充填層における温度をいい、該温度として、後述する実施例では使用する炉の雰囲気温度で制御した。
[Roasting process]
In the roasting step, the roasting mixture is roasted to obtain the roasted product shown in B of FIG. In the roasting process represented by the arrow a from A to B in FIG. In the iron ore 11, the phosphorus in the iron ore 11 migrates to the slag phase (impurity phase mainly composed of components other than iron, hereinafter referred to as the “roasted slag phase”) 14 formed by roasting the flux, and the roasted slag It is believed to bond with phase 14 . In order to exhibit the function and effect, it is preferable to set the roasting temperature to 1150° C. or higher at which at least a part of the mixture can be melted. Said temperature may even be 1200° C. or higher. The upper limit of the roasting temperature is not particularly limited from the viewpoint of transferring phosphorus from the iron ore to the slag phase. For example, the upper limit of the temperature may be set to about 1500° C. from the viewpoint of suppressing deterioration of equipment. The roasting temperature refers to the temperature in the packed layer of the mixture of iron ore and flux, and this temperature was controlled by the atmospheric temperature of the furnace used in the examples described later.

 本実施形態における焙焼の雰囲気とは、焙焼による酸化鉄の還元率(本明細書において「鉄の還元率」という)が10%以下となるような雰囲気をいう。本実施形態では、焙焼の段階では酸化鉄の還元を抑制し、焙焼工程と還元工程を分けて、還元工程で酸化鉄の還元を行うことによって、鉄鉱石に含まれるかまたは鉄鉱石に由来の鉄相(以下、単に「鉄相」という)とリンを分離しかつ鉄相へのリンの混入を防止できる。上記還元率は、好ましくは8%以下、より好ましくは5%以下であり、0%であってもよい。上記還元率を達成するための手段は、上述した雰囲気の制御、温度の制御などが挙げられる。 The roasting atmosphere in the present embodiment refers to an atmosphere in which the reduction rate of iron oxide due to roasting (referred to as the "iron reduction rate" in this specification) is 10% or less. In the present embodiment, the reduction of iron oxide is suppressed in the roasting stage, the roasting process and the reduction process are separated, and iron oxide is reduced in the reduction process, so that It is possible to separate phosphorus from the original iron phase (hereinafter simply referred to as "iron phase") and prevent phosphorus from being mixed into the iron phase. The reduction rate is preferably 8% or less, more preferably 5% or less, and may be 0%. Means for achieving the above reduction rate include the above-described atmosphere control, temperature control, and the like.

 前記雰囲気として、酸素含有雰囲気が挙げられる。例えば大気雰囲気とすることができる。焙焼工程では、例えば熱源として炭材を用いることも可能であり、この炭材を用いた場合、大気雰囲気よりもやや還元雰囲気となりうるが、その様な雰囲気も許容される。焙焼のための設備として、例えば電気抵抗炉(外部加熱)、バーナー式加熱炉、ドワイトロイド式焼結機、ポット型焼結機等を用いることができる。 The atmosphere includes an oxygen-containing atmosphere. For example, it can be an air atmosphere. In the roasting step, it is possible to use, for example, a carbonaceous material as a heat source, and when this carbonaceous material is used, the atmosphere may be somewhat reducing than the atmospheric atmosphere, but such an atmosphere is also acceptable. As equipment for roasting, for example, an electric resistance furnace (external heating), a burner-type heating furnace, a Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine, a pot-type sintering machine, or the like can be used.

 [還元工程]
 還元工程では、前記焙焼物を、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含む雰囲気で還元し、図1のCに示される還元物、すなわち還元鉄相とスラグ相を含む還元物を得る。図1のBからCへの矢印bで表される還元工程を経ることで、酸化鉄含有相13が還元されて、還元鉄相16と、リンが固定されたままである還元スラグ相17(前記焙焼スラグ相14がこの還元工程を経た後のスラグ相)とで形成された、還元物が得られる。本実施形態において、焙焼工程と還元工程を分け、還元工程にて上記雰囲気で還元を行うことでリンを化学的に容易に分離できる理由について、以下に詳述する。
[Reduction step]
In the reduction step, the roasted product is reduced in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product shown in C of FIG. 1, that is, a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase. Through the reduction step represented by the arrow b from B to C in FIG. A reduced product is obtained in which the roasted slag phase 14 is formed with the slag phase after undergoing this reduction step. The reason why phosphorus can be easily separated chemically by separating the roasting process and the reduction process in the present embodiment and performing reduction in the above atmosphere in the reduction process will be described in detail below.

 還元時に酸素分圧が低くなると、スラグ中のPの酸素が乖離してリンが発生し、これがFeと結びつきやすく、鉄鉱石からのリンの除去が困難となる。よって還元時の酸素分圧は変動を抑える必要がある。しかし、非特許文献1の方法では還元時の酸素分圧が変動しやすいと考えられる。非特許文献1の方法では炭材を用いているが、この様に炭材を用いると、還元時に炭材の周囲で酸素分圧が局所的に低下することや、炭材が加熱されることで、COガス、COガスが生じるなど、予測できない酸素の消費が生じるためである。一方、本実施形態によれば、COガス、水素ガスといったガス状態の還元剤を還元に使用するため、還元時の酸素分圧の変動を抑制でき、酸素分圧の低減によるリンの鉄との結合を防止でき、その結果、リンが化学的に分離した状態を維持できると考えられる。 When the oxygen partial pressure is lowered during reduction, the oxygen in P 2 O 5 in the slag is dissociated to generate phosphorus, which easily combines with Fe, making it difficult to remove phosphorus from the iron ore. Therefore, it is necessary to suppress fluctuations in the oxygen partial pressure during reduction. However, in the method of Non-Patent Document 1, the oxygen partial pressure during reduction is likely to fluctuate. The method of Non-Patent Document 1 uses a carbonaceous material, but if such a carbonaceous material is used, the oxygen partial pressure may locally decrease around the carbonaceous material during reduction, and the carbonaceous material may be heated. This is because unpredictable consumption of oxygen such as CO gas and CO 2 gas occurs. On the other hand, according to the present embodiment, since a gaseous reducing agent such as CO gas or hydrogen gas is used for reduction, it is possible to suppress fluctuations in the oxygen partial pressure during reduction, and the reduction in the oxygen partial pressure makes it possible to separate phosphorus from iron. It is believed that the binding can be prevented so that the phosphorus can be kept chemically separated.

 還元工程における雰囲気を構成するガスは、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含んでいればよく、残りのガス成分は特に限定されない。還元を目的としていることから、残りのガス成分は酸化作用を有しないガスであることが好ましい。残りのガス成分として、例えばCOガス、Nガスなどが挙げられる。後述する実施例では還元ガスとして、COガス単独、またはCOガスと水素ガスの混合ガスを用いているが、還元ガスが水素ガスのみであってもよく、例えば、水素ガスが10%で残りがNガスであってもよい。本実施形態によれば、還元ガスとして水素を使用する場合、非特許文献1のように還元剤として炭材を使用する場合と比較して温室効果ガスの削減に寄与する。 The gas that constitutes the atmosphere in the reduction step should contain at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas, and the remaining gas components are not particularly limited. Since the purpose is reduction, the remaining gas components are preferably gases having no oxidizing action. The remaining gas components include, for example, CO 2 gas, N 2 gas, and the like. In the embodiments described later, CO gas alone or a mixed gas of CO gas and hydrogen gas is used as the reducing gas, but the reducing gas may be only hydrogen gas. It may be N2 gas. According to this embodiment, the use of hydrogen as the reducing gas contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gases compared to the case of using carbon material as the reducing agent as in Non-Patent Document 1.

 上記条件で還元を行うことにより、SiOやAlの還元スラグ相17への移行が進み、かつ、多くのリンは還元スラグ相17に固定された状態で、酸化鉄含有相13の還元が進み、例えばM.Fe(金属鉄)またはFe主体の還元鉄相16が得られる。すなわち、上記酸化焙焼と上記還元の工程により、還元スラグ相17に固定されたリンと還元鉄相16に化学的に十分分離された還元物を得ることができる。 By performing the reduction under the above conditions, the transfer of SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 to the reduced slag phase 17 proceeds, and most of the phosphorus is fixed in the reduced slag phase 17, and the iron oxide-containing phase 13 is reduced. Reduction progresses, for example, M. A reduced iron phase 16 mainly composed of Fe (metallic iron) or Fe 3 O 4 is obtained. That is, by the above-described oxidizing roasting and reduction steps, the phosphorus fixed in the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 that are chemically sufficiently separated can be obtained.

 本実施形態において、還元鉄相には、M.Fe(金属鉄)のみならず、Feの還元により得られた上記Feの他、FeOも含みうる。また還元鉄相には、不純物として例えば、鉄以外の元素の酸化物等を含みうる。 In the present embodiment, the reduced iron phase includes M.I. It can contain not only Fe (metallic iron), but also FeO, in addition to the above Fe 3 O 4 obtained by reduction of Fe 2 O 3 . The reduced iron phase may also contain impurities such as oxides of elements other than iron.

 還元工程の雰囲気温度は、例えば600℃以上、900℃以下の範囲とすることができる。該還元工程の雰囲気温度は、還元のための炉における雰囲気温度をいう。好ましくは還元工程の雰囲気温度は850℃以下である。後述する実施例で説明する通り、雰囲気温度が900℃の場合、Fe-P相の生成の兆候が見られた。このことから、還元時の温度が高すぎると、焙焼工程でスラグ相(不純物相)側に移行し固定したリンが、鉄相と再び結合するおそれがあると考えられる。還元工程の雰囲気温度の下限は、還元を促進させる観点から、650℃以上であることが好ましい。 The atmospheric temperature in the reduction process can be, for example, in the range of 600°C or higher and 900°C or lower. The ambient temperature in the reduction step refers to the ambient temperature in the furnace for reduction. Preferably, the ambient temperature in the reduction step is 850° C. or lower. As will be explained later in the Examples, when the ambient temperature is 900° C., signs of Fe—P phase formation were observed. From this, it is considered that if the temperature during reduction is too high, the phosphorus that migrates to the slag phase (impurity phase) in the roasting process and is fixed may bond with the iron phase again. The lower limit of the atmospheric temperature in the reduction step is preferably 650° C. or higher from the viewpoint of promoting the reduction.

 還元の時間は、処理量に応じて適宜決定することができる。上記雰囲気温度での還元が終了した後、室温までの冷却時は、非酸化雰囲気であればよく、還元ガス雰囲気に限定されない。例えば、Nガス、その他のAr等の不活性ガスの雰囲気であってもよい。 The reduction time can be appropriately determined according to the throughput. After completion of the reduction at the ambient temperature, the cooling to room temperature may be performed in a non-oxidizing atmosphere, and is not limited to a reducing gas atmosphere. For example, an atmosphere of N 2 gas or other inert gas such as Ar may be used.

 還元工程で還元後の酸化鉄の還元率(本明細書において「鉄の還元率」という)は50%以上であることが好ましい。還元により鉄の還元率が高くなることにより、リンを含む還元スラグ相とは異なる粉砕特性の還元鉄相の割合が増加して、還元鉄相と還元スラグ相、即ち金属-酸化物の界面の多い還元物が得られると考えられる。そして該還元物の粉砕工程において、後に詳述の通り、酸化鉄相と還元スラグ相のような酸化物相どうしの界面よりも、前記金属-酸化物の界面には亀裂が生じやすく、還元鉄相と還元スラグ相を効率的に分離できる。前記還元率は、より好ましくは70%以上、更に好ましくは80%以上、より更に好ましくは90%以上であり、最も好ましくは100%である。前記還元率は、後述する実施例に記載の方法で求められる。 The reduction rate of iron oxide after reduction in the reduction step (referred to in this specification as "iron reduction rate") is preferably 50% or more. By increasing the reduction rate of iron by reduction, the ratio of the reduced iron phase with different crushing characteristics from the phosphorus-containing reduced slag phase increases, and the reduced iron phase and the reduced slag phase, that is, the interface between the metal and the oxide, increases. It is considered that a large amount of reduced product is obtained. In the pulverization step of the reduced product, as will be described in detail later, cracks are more likely to occur at the metal-oxide interface than at the interface between the oxide phases such as the iron oxide phase and the reduced slag phase. phase and reduced slag phase can be efficiently separated. The reduction rate is more preferably 70% or higher, still more preferably 80% or higher, still more preferably 90% or higher, and most preferably 100%. The reduction rate is determined by the method described in Examples below.

 [粉砕工程]
 粉砕工程では、前記還元物を粉砕して、還元物を構成するスラグ相の少なくとも一部が分離した還元鉄相含有物を含む粉砕物を得る。図1のCからDへの矢印cで表される粉砕工程により、図1のDに示す通り、還元スラグ相17と還元鉄相16とが粉砕の衝撃により分離される。この粉砕と下記の選別回収により、リンは物理的に分離される。還元物は、金属と酸化物といった異なる粉砕特性を有する物質で構成され、異相界面が形成されうる。還元ままでは、図1のCの通り還元鉄相とスラグ相が結合したままであるが、粉砕を行うことで、還元スラグ相と還元鉄相16の界面で効率的に分離しやすくなり、分離後は、下記の選別回収工程で還元鉄相16を回収しやすくなる。なお、上述の通り図1はイメージ図であり、図1の通り還元スラグ相17と還元鉄相16が完全に分離されることに加え、還元鉄相16に還元スラグ相17の一部が残存する場合も含みうる。本実施形態では、還元スラグ相17と完全に分離した還元鉄相16と、還元鉄相16に還元スラグ相17の一部が残存するものとを総称して「還元鉄相含有物」という。粉砕は、ケージミル、ボールミル、ロータリーミル、ジェットミルなどの粉砕設備を用いて行われる。これらの粉砕設備のうち、ケージミルを用いて前記還元物を粉砕することが好ましい。衝撃を加えるタイプのケージミルによる粉砕は、例えばすり潰すタイプのボールミルによる粉砕よりも、上記還元鉄相とスラグ相の界面に亀裂を生じさせる力が効率良く作用すると考えられる。
[Pulverization process]
In the pulverization step, the reduced material is pulverized to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material in which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated. By the pulverization process represented by the arrow c from C to D in FIG. 1, the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 are separated by the impact of the pulverization, as shown in D of FIG. Phosphorus is physically separated by this pulverization and the following sorting and recovery. The reductant is composed of substances with different grinding properties, such as metals and oxides, and heterophase interfaces can be formed. In the state of reduction, the reduced iron phase and the slag phase remain bonded as shown in C in FIG. Thereafter, the reduced iron phase 16 can be easily collected in the following sorting and collecting step. As described above, FIG. 1 is an image diagram, and in addition to the complete separation of the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 as shown in FIG. It can also include cases. In the present embodiment, the reduced iron phase 16 completely separated from the reduced slag phase 17 and the reduced iron phase 16 in which a part of the reduced slag phase 17 remains are collectively referred to as "reduced iron phase inclusions". Pulverization is performed using pulverization equipment such as a cage mill, ball mill, rotary mill and jet mill. Among these pulverizing facilities, it is preferable to use a cage mill to pulverize the reduced product. In pulverization by an impact-type cage mill, the force that causes cracks at the interface between the reduced iron phase and the slag phase is thought to act more efficiently than, for example, in pulverization by a grinding-type ball mill.

 [選別回収工程]
 選別回収工程では、前記粉砕物から還元鉄相含有物を選別回収する。図1のDからEへの矢印dで表される選別回収工程により、還元鉄相含有物(図1のEでは、例として還元鉄相16のみ表示)を得る。金属鉄は磁性を有するため、選別回収する方法として磁力選別(磁選)を用いることができる。前段の還元によって鉄相が磁性を帯びることで、磁力選別が可能となる。磁力選別は、比重選鉱などと比較し分離効率が高いことが知られている。なお、前記還元工程での還元を十分に行わずに、例えば還元鉄相がFe主体である場合、異相界面形成による粉砕促進効果は十分ではないが、Feも金属鉄と同様に磁性を有するため、磁力選別を用いることができ、そのような態様も本実施形態に含まれうる。また、還元鉄相含有物に更なる工程を施して鉄源としてもよい。
[Sort collection process]
In the sorting and recovering step, the reduced iron phase-containing material is sorted and recovered from the pulverized material. A reduced iron phase-containing material (in E of FIG. 1, only the reduced iron phase 16 is shown as an example) is obtained by the sorting and recovery step represented by the arrow d from D to E in FIG. Since metallic iron has magnetism, magnetic separation (magnetic separation) can be used as a method for sorting and recovering. Magnetic separation becomes possible because the iron phase becomes magnetized by the reduction in the previous stage. Magnetic separation is known to have higher separation efficiency than gravity separation. For example, when the reduction in the reduction step is not sufficiently performed and the reduced iron phase is mainly Fe 3 O 4 , the effect of promoting pulverization due to the formation of the interface between different phases is not sufficient, but Fe 3 O 4 is also combined with metallic iron. Since it also has magnetism, magnetic selection can be used, and such aspects can also be included in the present embodiment. Alternatively, the reduced iron phase-containing material may be subjected to further steps to obtain an iron source.

 磁力選別の方法として、還元鉄相と還元スラグ相との分離が可能であれば特に限定されず、例えば、ハンド磁選でも問題ないが、大量処理が伴う場合、ドラム式磁選機、ロータリー式磁選機などの大型磁選機を使用してもよい。 The method of magnetic separation is not particularly limited as long as it is possible to separate the reduced iron phase and the reduced slag phase. You may use a large-sized magnetic separator, such as.

 以下、実施例を挙げて本開示をより具体的に説明する。本開示は以下の実施例によって制限を受けるものではなく、前述および後述する趣旨に合致し得る範囲で、適宜変更を加えて実施することも可能であり、それらはいずれも本開示の技術的範囲に包含される。 Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described more specifically with examples. The present disclosure is not limited by the following examples, and can be implemented with appropriate modifications within the scope that can match the spirit described above and below, and they are all within the technical scope of the present disclosure. subsumed in

 以下の実施例では、鉄鉱石からリンを除去し、還元鉄相含有物を得るラボ試験を行った。 In the following examples, laboratory tests were conducted to remove phosphorus from iron ore and obtain reduced iron phase inclusions.

 [準備工程]
 リン除去対象物である鉄鉱石として、表1に示す化学成分を有する銘柄A、Bの鉄鉱石を用いた。いずれの銘柄も豪州産である。前記銘柄AまたはBの鉄鉱石を用い、No.1~7の7例のラボ試験を行った。No.1~5では、鉄鉱石を篩下2mm未満に篩って使用した。No.6および7では、鉄鉱石を篩下0.5mm未満に篩って使用した。また、フラックスとして、No.1~5では、富士フイルム和光純薬株式会社製CaCO試薬(篩下45μm未満)を用いた。一方、No.6および7では、フラックスとして、工業用石灰石(篩上2mm以上、篩下4mm未満)を用いた。上記鉄鉱石とフラックスを、焙焼用混合物のCaO/SiOが2.0となるように混合して、焙焼用混合物を得た。
[Preparation process]
Iron ores of brands A and B having the chemical components shown in Table 1 were used as iron ores to be removed from phosphorus. Both brands are Australian. Using the iron ore of the above grade A or B, No. Seven lab tests, numbered 1-7, were performed. No. In 1 to 5, the iron ore was sieved to less than 2 mm under the sieve and used. No. In 6 and 7, the iron ore was sieved to less than 0.5 mm below the sieves. Also, as a flux, No. In 1 to 5, a CaCO 3 reagent (less than 45 μm under sieve) manufactured by Fuji Film Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. was used. On the other hand, No. In 6 and 7, industrial limestone (2 mm or more above the sieve and less than 4 mm below the sieve) was used as the flux. The above iron ore and flux were mixed so that the CaO/SiO 2 ratio of the roasting mixture was 2.0 to obtain a roasting mixture.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000001
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000001

 [焙焼工程]
 焙焼には、抵抗式電気加熱炉を用いた。上記焙焼用混合物を株式会社ニッカトー製緻密質MgO容器に入れ、大気雰囲気中にて、昇温速度10℃/minで1300℃(炉内の雰囲気温度)まで昇温してから1300℃で30分間保持した。その後、室温まで冷却して焙焼サンプルを得た。
[Roasting process]
A resistance electric heating furnace was used for roasting. The above roasting mixture is placed in a dense MgO container manufactured by Nikkato Co., Ltd., heated to 1300 ° C. (atmospheric temperature in the furnace) at a heating rate of 10 ° C./min in an air atmosphere, and then heated to 1300 ° C. for 30 minutes. held for a minute. Then, it was cooled to room temperature to obtain a roasted sample.

 (化学成分の分析)
 焙焼サンプルの化学成分を次の通り分析した。T.Fe(全鉄)量は塩化チタン(III)還元二クロム酸カリウム滴定法、FeO量は二クロム酸カリウム滴定法、M.Fe(金属鉄)量は臭素メタノール分解-EDTA滴定法で求めた。また、リンの定量は、JIS M8216(吸光光度法)に準じて実施した。なお、FeO、M.Feについて、検出下限である0.10質量%を下回っている場合は、0.10%であるとした。
(Analysis of chemical components)
The chemical composition of the roasted samples was analyzed as follows. T. The amount of Fe (total iron) was measured by titanium (III) chloride reduction potassium dichromate titration method, and the amount of FeO was measured by potassium dichromate titration method. The amount of Fe (metallic iron) was determined by the bromine-methanol decomposition-EDTA titration method. Also, phosphorus was quantified according to JIS M8216 (absorption photometry). Note that FeO, M.I. When Fe was below the detection limit of 0.10% by mass, it was defined as 0.10%.

 また、鉄の還元率を下記式から求めた。これらの結果を表2に示す。 In addition, the iron reduction rate was obtained from the following formula. These results are shown in Table 2.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000002
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000002

 上記式において(FeO%)、(T.Fe%)、(M.Fe%)は、各工程後(表2では焙焼後、後記の表3では還元後)のFeO、T.Fe、M.Feの各質量%を示す。  In the above formula, (FeO%), (T.Fe%), and (M.Fe%) are FeO, T.E after each step (after roasting in Table 2, after reduction in Table 3 below). Fe, M. Each mass % of Fe is shown.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000003
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000003

 [還元工程]
 前記焙焼サンプルを、事前に手粉砕またはケージミルを用いて塊砕し、篩にかけて篩下2mm未満の還元用サンプルを得た。還元は、内径130mmで長さ200mmのドラム型回転加熱炉を用いて実施した。還元条件は、表3に示す通りとした。還元ガスは室温で表3に示すガス組成の通り混合後、炉内に導入した。また、昇温開始直後から還元ガスを導入した。表3に示す温度まで、昇温速度:450℃/hで昇温した。表3に示す温度で表3に示す時間の保持を行った後、N雰囲気で室温まで冷却して、還元サンプルを得た。還元工程におけるその他の条件は以下の通りとした。尚、上記温度は炉内の雰囲気温度である。
 ・ドラム型回転加熱炉の回転数:12rpm
 ・還元用サンプル量:500g
 ・還元ガスの流量:10NL/min
[Reduction step]
The roasted sample was previously crushed manually or by using a cage mill and sieved to obtain a sample for reduction with a sieve undersize of less than 2 mm. The reduction was carried out using a drum type rotary heating furnace with an inner diameter of 130 mm and a length of 200 mm. Reduction conditions were as shown in Table 3. The reducing gas was introduced into the furnace after mixing according to the gas composition shown in Table 3 at room temperature. Moreover, the reducing gas was introduced immediately after the start of the temperature rise. The temperature was increased to the temperature shown in Table 3 at a temperature increase rate of 450°C/h. After maintaining the temperature shown in Table 3 for the time shown in Table 3, the sample was cooled to room temperature in an N2 atmosphere to obtain a reduced sample. Other conditions in the reduction step were as follows. The above temperature is the ambient temperature in the furnace.
・Rotation speed of drum type rotary heating furnace: 12 rpm
・Amount of sample for reduction: 500g
・Flow rate of reducing gas: 10 NL/min

 還元サンプルの化学成分の分析を、前記焙焼サンプルの化学成分の分析と同様にして行った。その結果を表3に併記する。 The analysis of the chemical components of the reduced sample was carried out in the same manner as the analysis of the chemical components of the roasted sample. The results are also shown in Table 3.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000004
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000004

 [粉砕工程]
 還元サンプルの粉砕を、株式会社増野製作所製ケージミルまたは吉田製作所製ボールミルを用いた。ケージミルを用いる場合は、回転数2850rpmで行った。また、ケージミルへの一回の供給量は200gとし、ケージミルで粉砕後のサンプルを再びケージミルに供給し、全量のサンプルが合計3回ケージミルを通過するよう処理し、粉砕サンプルを得た。ボールミルを用いる場合は、粉砕ボールとして鋼球を充填し、回転数68rpmで60秒間運転して粉砕した。サンプルの供給量は140gとした。
[Pulverization process]
A cage mill manufactured by Masuno Seisakusho Co., Ltd. or a ball mill manufactured by Yoshida Seisakusho Co., Ltd. was used to pulverize the reduced sample. When using a cage mill, the number of revolutions was 2850 rpm. In addition, the amount supplied to the cage mill at one time was 200 g, and the sample after pulverization by the cage mill was supplied to the cage mill again, and the entire amount of the sample was processed so that it passed through the cage mill three times in total to obtain a pulverized sample. In the case of using a ball mill, steel balls were filled as grinding balls, and the powder was ground by driving at a rotation speed of 68 rpm for 60 seconds. The amount of sample supplied was 140 g.

 [選別回収(磁選)工程]
 選別回収方法として、磁選を行い、還元鉄相含有物を得た。磁選は、乾式ドラム磁選機に粉砕サンプルを装入して行った。乾式ドラム磁選機の回転数は80rpmとした。乾式ドラム磁選機への粉砕物の供給量は50g/回とし、2回行った。そして、各回(N1、N2)の磁着率の測定と化学成分(T.FeとP)の分析を行った。磁着率は、下記式から求めた。また化学成分は、焙焼サンプルの化学成分分析と同様にして求めた。その結果を表4に示す。
[Sorting and collecting (magnetic separation) process]
As a method for sorting and collecting, magnetic separation was performed to obtain a reduced iron phase-containing material. Magnetic separation was carried out by inserting the pulverized sample into a dry drum magnetic separator. The rotational speed of the dry drum magnetic separator was set to 80 rpm. The amount of pulverized material supplied to the dry drum magnetic separator was set to 50 g/time, and the process was carried out twice. Then, the magnetization rate was measured and the chemical components (T. Fe and P) were analyzed for each time (N1, N2). The magnetization ratio was obtained from the following formula. Also, the chemical components were obtained in the same manner as the chemical component analysis of the roasted sample. Table 4 shows the results.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000005
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000005

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000006
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000006

 更に、リン除去率および鉄回収率を、下記式から求めた。リン除去率および鉄回収率の算出には2回磁選した平均値を用いた。その結果を表5に示す。 Furthermore, the phosphorus removal rate and iron recovery rate were obtained from the following formulas. The average value of two magnetic separations was used to calculate the phosphorus removal rate and iron recovery rate. Table 5 shows the results.

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000007
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000007

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000008
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-M000008

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000009
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-T000009

 上記方法で実施した、鉄鉱石からのリン除去のラボ試験の結果から、本実施形態の製造方法の通り焙焼工程と還元工程を経た後に、選別回収を行うことによって、15%以上のリン除去率を達成できた。 From the results of the laboratory test of phosphorus removal from iron ore carried out by the above method, 15% or more of phosphorus was removed by sorting and recovering after going through the roasting process and the reduction process according to the production method of this embodiment. rate was achieved.

 [顕微鏡観察およびEDX分析]
 実施例2における、焙焼および還元後に粉砕したサンプルを樹脂に埋めて断面研磨を行ってから、走査型電子顕微鏡で観察した。その結果を図2に示す。更に、図2の符号1と符号2のそれぞれの分析点の成分を、EDX(エネルギー分散X線分光法、energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy)で分析した。その結果を図3に示す。なお、図3のEDX半定量分析値は、各元素が図3の凡例に示す酸化物を形成していると仮定し、酸素以外の各元素量から算出した。
[Microscopic observation and EDX analysis]
The sample pulverized after roasting and reduction in Example 2 was embedded in resin, cross-sectionally polished, and then observed with a scanning electron microscope. The results are shown in FIG. Further, the components at the analysis points indicated by reference numerals 1 and 2 in FIG. 2 were analyzed by EDX (energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy). The results are shown in FIG. The EDX semi-quantitative analysis values in FIG. 3 were calculated from the amount of each element other than oxygen, assuming that each element forms an oxide shown in the legend of FIG.

 上記図2および図3から、上記図2の符号1のグレー部分はリン濃化相であり、上記図2の符号2の白色の多い領域は鉄相であることを確認した。また、上記図2および図3と、上記表5の結果から、酸化焙焼および還元の後に選別回収を行うことによって、高いリン除去率を達成できた理由として、上記酸化焙焼と還元により、鉄鉱石中のリンが不純物相に移動し鉄と結合することなく固定、すなわちリンが化学的に十分に分離除去され、かつ、その後の粉砕と選別回収により、リンを含有するスラグ相が分離除去されて、磁性を帯びた還元鉄相が回収されたためと考えられる。  From Figures 2 and 3 above, it was confirmed that the gray portion indicated by reference numeral 1 in Figure 2 above is the phosphorus enriched phase, and the white area indicated by reference number 2 in Figure 2 above is the iron phase. 2 and 3 and the results in Table 5 above, the reason why a high phosphorus removal rate was achieved by performing sorting and recovery after oxidizing roasting and reduction is that the oxidizing roasting and reduction are: Phosphorus in the iron ore moves to the impurity phase and is fixed without bonding with iron, that is, the phosphorus is sufficiently separated and removed chemically, and the slag phase containing phosphorus is separated and removed by subsequent pulverization and sorting recovery. It is considered that the magnetic reduced iron phase was collected by the heat treatment.

 [XAFSを用いたリンの化学結合状態の評価]
 銘柄Bの鉄鉱石を用いて行った上記ラボ試験の、焙焼前後の各試料と、600℃、700℃、800℃、900℃の各温度で還元後の各試料とを用い、放射光によるX線吸収端分析(XAFS、X-ray Absorption Fine Structure)を行って、リンの化学結合状態を評価した。XAFS測定には下記に示す設備・方法を用いた。その評価結果を図4に示す。なお図4では、評価対象として、FeP、FeP、Caのそれぞれの化合物についても同様の分析を行った。
・施設:立命館大学SRセンター
・ビームライン:BL-13
・吸収端:常温でのP K-edge,Si K-edge,Al K-edge
・測定方法:蛍光法による測定
[Evaluation of chemical bonding state of phosphorus using XAFS]
Using synchrotron radiation, each sample before and after roasting and each sample after reduction at each temperature of 600 ° C., 700 ° C., 800 ° C., and 900 ° C. in the laboratory test conducted using brand B iron ore X-ray absorption edge analysis (XAFS, X-ray Absorption Fine Structure) was performed to evaluate the chemical bonding state of phosphorus. The equipment and method shown below were used for the XAFS measurement. The evaluation results are shown in FIG. In FIG. 4, the same analysis was performed for each of the compounds Fe 3 P, Fe 2 P, and Ca 2 P 2 O 7 as evaluation targets.
・Facility: Ritsumeikan University SR Center ・Beamline: BL-13
・Absorption edge: P K-edge, Si K-edge, Al K-edge at room temperature
・Measurement method: Measurement by fluorescence method

 図4において矢印Qで示される、2145~2150eV付近のスペクトルの肩は、焙焼前の鉄鉱石において、リンが鉄リン酸塩を形成していることを示す。本実施形態によれば、フラックスが存在する状態で鉄鉱石を焙焼することにより、この矢印Qで示されるバンドの吸収が消失し、実線でピークを示したCaに近い結合状態となっている、すなわち、リンがCaに固定されていることが分かる。 The spectral shoulder near 2145-2150 eV indicated by arrow Q in FIG. 4 indicates that phosphorus forms iron phosphate in iron ore before roasting. According to the present embodiment, by roasting the iron ore in the presence of flux, the absorption of the band indicated by the arrow Q disappears, and the bond close to Ca 2 P 2 O 7 indicated by the solid line peak In other words, phosphorus is fixed to Ca.

 [還元温度について]
 前記図4において、800℃以下の温度で還元を行ったサンプルでは、2145~2150eV付近のエネルギー吸収は観測されなかったが、900℃で還元したサンプルでは、矢印Rで示したFe-P系化合物のピークと同じ位置で、図4の矢印Zに示される通りエネルギー吸収が観測され、このサンプルにおいてFe-P系化合物が生じたことが推察される。このことから、還元時にリンの鉄との結合を抑制するには、還元温度を900℃よりも低くすることが好適であることが分かる。
[Reduction temperature]
In FIG. 4, energy absorption near 2145 to 2150 eV was not observed in the samples reduced at a temperature of 800° C. or lower, but in the samples reduced at 900° C., the Fe—P-based compound indicated by the arrow R At the same position as the peak of , energy absorption was observed as indicated by arrow Z in FIG. From this, it can be seen that the reduction temperature is preferably lower than 900° C. in order to suppress the binding of phosphorus to iron during reduction.

 また、表3および表5のデータをもとに、還元時の温度とリン除去率の関係を整理したグラフを図5に示す。この図5から、還元時の温度を高めすぎるとリン除去率は低下する傾向にあり、より高いリン除去率の達成、例えば約20%以上のより高いリン除去率を達成させる観点からは、還元時の温度を850℃以下とすることが好ましいことがわかる。 Also, based on the data in Tables 3 and 5, a graph showing the relationship between the temperature during reduction and the phosphorus removal rate is shown in FIG. From this FIG. 5, if the temperature during reduction is too high, the phosphorus removal rate tends to decrease, and from the viewpoint of achieving a higher phosphorus removal rate, for example, about 20% or more, the reduction It can be seen that it is preferable to set the temperature at 850° C. or lower.

 更に、表3および表5のデータをもとに、還元工程後の鉄の還元率とリン除去率の関係を整理したグラフを図6に示す。この図6から、還元工程後の鉄の還元率が好ましくは50%以上であると、リン除去率を高めることができ、約20%以上のより高いリン除去率を達成することも可能であることがわかる。これは、前述の通り、還元により還元率が高くなることで、リンを含む還元スラグ相とは異なる粉砕特性の還元鉄相の割合が増加し、金属-酸化物の界面の多い還元物が得られ、粉砕で該界面に亀裂が生じやすく、還元鉄相と還元スラグ相を効率的に分離できたためと考えられる。なおNo.3は、還元率は高いが、上述の通り、還元時の温度が高めでありリン除去率はNo.2等よりは低かった。 Furthermore, based on the data in Tables 3 and 5, FIG. 6 shows a graph that summarizes the relationship between the iron reduction rate after the reduction process and the phosphorus removal rate. From this FIG. 6, if the iron reduction rate after the reduction step is preferably 50% or more, the phosphorus removal rate can be increased, and it is possible to achieve a higher phosphorus removal rate of about 20% or more. I understand. This is because, as mentioned above, the rate of reduction is increased by reduction, and the ratio of the reduced iron phase, which has different pulverization characteristics from the reduced slag phase containing phosphorus, increases, resulting in a reduced product with many metal-oxide interfaces. This is probably because the reduced iron phase and the reduced slag phase were efficiently separated from each other because cracks were likely to occur at the interface during pulverization. In addition, No. In No. 3, the reduction rate is high, but the temperature during reduction is high as described above, and the phosphorus removal rate is No. 3. It was lower than 2nd class.

 また図6において、同様の還元率を示すサンプル間でリン除去率を比較したところ、還元率が約90%であるNo.2とNo.6,7との対比から、No.2のサンプルのリン除去率が高いことがわかる。これは粉砕工程において、好ましくはケージミルにより還元物を粉砕したことにより、還元鉄相とスラグ相の界面に亀裂を生じさせる力が効率良く作用し、リンを含むスラグ相を十分分離できたこと等によると考えられる。 In addition, in FIG. 6, when the phosphorus removal rate was compared between samples showing similar reduction rates, No. 1, which has a reduction rate of about 90%, was found. 2 and No. From the comparison with No. 6 and 7, No. It can be seen that the phosphorus removal rate of sample No. 2 is high. This is because, in the pulverization process, preferably by pulverizing the reduced product with a cage mill, the force that causes cracks at the interface between the reduced iron phase and the slag phase acts efficiently, and the slag phase containing phosphorus can be sufficiently separated. According to

 本出願は、出願日が2022年2月28日である日本国特許出願、特願第2022-030105号を基礎出願とする優先権主張、および出願日が2022年8月25日である日本国特許出願、特願第2022-134387号を基礎出願とする優先権主張を伴う。特願第2022-030105号および特願第2022-134387号は参照することにより本明細書に取り込まれる。 This application is a Japanese patent application filed on February 28, 2022, a priority claim based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-030105, and a Japanese patent application filed on August 25, 2022. It is accompanied by a priority claim based on a patent application, Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-134387. Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-030105 and Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-134387 are incorporated herein by reference.

  1 リン濃化相
  2 鉄相
  11 鉄鉱石
  12 フラックス
  13 酸化鉄含有相
  14 焙焼スラグ相
  15 リン移行
  16 還元鉄相
  17 還元スラグ相
  a 焙焼
  b 還元
  c 粉砕
  d 選別回収
1 Phosphorus-enriched phase 2 Iron phase 11 Iron ore 12 Flux 13 Iron oxide-containing phase 14 Roasted slag phase 15 Phosphorus migration 16 Reduced iron phase 17 Reduced slag phase a Roasting b Reduction c Pulverization d Sorting and recovery

Claims (8)

 リンを含有する鉄鉱石とフラックスを含む原料を混合して、焙焼用混合物を準備する準備工程と、
 前記焙焼用混合物を焙焼して焙焼物を得る焙焼工程と、
 前記焙焼物を、COガスと水素ガスの少なくとも1つを含む雰囲気で還元して、還元鉄相とスラグ相を含む還元物を得る還元工程と、
 前記還元物を粉砕して、還元物を構成するスラグ相の少なくとも一部が分離した還元鉄相含有物を含む粉砕物を得る粉砕工程と、
 前記粉砕物から前記還元鉄相含有物を選別回収する選別回収工程と、を含み、
 前記焙焼による鉄の還元率は10%以下であり、
 前記フラックスは、アルカリ金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物、ならびにアルカリ土類金属の酸化物、炭酸塩、水酸化物、および水和物よりなる群から選択される1以上を含む、鉄源の製造方法。
a preparation step of mixing iron ore containing phosphorus and raw materials containing flux to prepare a roasting mixture;
a roasting step of roasting the roasting mixture to obtain a roasted product;
a reduction step of reducing the roasted product in an atmosphere containing at least one of CO gas and hydrogen gas to obtain a reduced product containing a reduced iron phase and a slag phase;
a pulverization step of pulverizing the reduced material to obtain a pulverized material containing a reduced iron phase-containing material from which at least a portion of the slag phase constituting the reduced material is separated;
a sorting and recovering step of sorting and recovering the reduced iron phase-containing material from the pulverized material,
The reduction rate of iron by roasting is 10% or less,
The flux is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates, and alkaline earth metal oxides, carbonates, hydroxides and hydrates1 A method for producing an iron source, comprising the above.
 前記フラックスはCaO、CaCOおよびCa(OH)よりなる群から選択される1以上である、請求項1に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for producing an iron source according to claim 1, wherein the flux is one or more selected from the group consisting of CaO, CaCO3 and Ca(OH) 2 .  前記選別回収工程で、選別回収する方法として磁力選別を行う、請求項1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for manufacturing an iron source according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in the sorting and recovering step, magnetic sorting is performed as a sorting and recovering method.  前記還元工程の雰囲気温度を850℃以下とする、請求項1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for producing an iron source according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the atmosphere temperature in the reduction step is 850°C or lower.  前記準備工程で、前記焙焼用混合物の塩基度CaO/SiOが1.0~5.0の範囲となるように、前記鉄鉱石とフラックスを混合する、請求項1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The iron according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in the preparation step, the iron ore and flux are mixed so that the basicity CaO/SiO 2 of the roasting mixture is in the range of 1.0 to 5.0. source manufacturing method.  前記還元工程後の鉄の還元率は50%以上である、請求項1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for producing an iron source according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.  前記粉砕工程で、ケージミルを用いて前記還元物を粉砕する、請求項1または2に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for producing an iron source according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in the pulverization step, the reduced product is pulverized using a cage mill.  前記還元工程後の鉄の還元率は50%以上である、請求項4に記載の鉄源の製造方法。 The method for producing an iron source according to claim 4, wherein the reduction rate of iron after the reduction step is 50% or more.
PCT/JP2023/004640 2022-02-28 2023-02-10 Iron source production method Ceased WO2023162729A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022030105 2022-02-28
JP2022-030105 2022-02-28
JP2022134387A JP7775166B2 (en) 2022-02-28 2022-08-25 Iron source manufacturing method
JP2022-134387 2022-08-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023162729A1 true WO2023162729A1 (en) 2023-08-31

Family

ID=87765826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2023/004640 Ceased WO2023162729A1 (en) 2022-02-28 2023-02-10 Iron source production method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023162729A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117403056A (en) * 2023-09-01 2024-01-16 攀枝花东立新材料有限公司 Methods to improve the reduction rate of high-valent iron in sulfur-concentrated acid-making slag

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53103915A (en) * 1977-02-22 1978-09-09 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Beneficiation method of direct iron making process
WO2014021473A1 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-02-06 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for producing metallic iron
CN104451016A (en) * 2014-11-25 2015-03-25 北京神雾环境能源科技集团股份有限公司 Method for separating metal iron from phosphorus containing iron ore
WO2018186066A1 (en) * 2017-04-05 2018-10-11 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for pretreating iron-making starting material
CN113403471A (en) * 2021-06-23 2021-09-17 中钢设备有限公司 Treatment method of high-phosphorus oolitic iron ore

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53103915A (en) * 1977-02-22 1978-09-09 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Beneficiation method of direct iron making process
WO2014021473A1 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-02-06 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for producing metallic iron
CN104451016A (en) * 2014-11-25 2015-03-25 北京神雾环境能源科技集团股份有限公司 Method for separating metal iron from phosphorus containing iron ore
WO2018186066A1 (en) * 2017-04-05 2018-10-11 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for pretreating iron-making starting material
CN113403471A (en) * 2021-06-23 2021-09-17 中钢设备有限公司 Treatment method of high-phosphorus oolitic iron ore

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
MARUOKA NOBUHIRO, KUBO HIRONARI: "Enrichment of Phosphorus from Iron Ore to Dicalcium-silicate Phase by Partial Reduction", TETSU TO HAGANE: JOURNAL OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN. TOKYO., JP, vol. 107, no. 6, 1 January 2021 (2021-01-01), JP , pages 527 - 533, XP093085719, ISSN: 0021-1575, DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2020-082 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117403056A (en) * 2023-09-01 2024-01-16 攀枝花东立新材料有限公司 Methods to improve the reduction rate of high-valent iron in sulfur-concentrated acid-making slag

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Prusti et al. Effect of limestone and dolomite flux on the quality of pellets using high LOI iron ore
CN109207715B (en) Method for roasting, modifying and recycling iron from copper slag
WO2018135439A1 (en) Method for eluting calcium from steelmaking slag, and method for collecting calcium from steelmaking slag
JP5944522B2 (en) Method of separating and recovering iron from waste nonferrous slag discharged from nonferrous metal smelting process
Łabaj et al. The use of waste, fine-grained carbonaceous material in the process of copper slag reduction
Wang et al. Separation of silicon and iron in copper slag by carbothermic reduction-alkaline leaching process
WO2017100808A1 (en) Manganese waste slag treatment
FI65814C (en) FOERFARANDE FOER EXTRAHERING AV VAERDEFULLA VANADINELEMENT UR VANADININNEHAOLLANDE JAERNMALMER
CN110551902B (en) A kind of fayalite type slag resource recovery method
Yang et al. A novel process for Fe recovery and Zn, Pb removal from a low-grade pyrite cinder with high Zn and Pb contents
Peng et al. Removal behavior of Zn, Pb, K and Na from cold bonded briquettes of metallurgical dust in simulated RHF
Mikoda et al. Corrigendum to “Metallurgical slags from Cu production and Pb recovery in Poland-Their environmental stability and resource potential”[Appl. Geochem. 98 (2018) 459-472]
WO2023162729A1 (en) Iron source production method
JP7341570B2 (en) How to produce copper metal from copper concentrate without producing waste
TWI840473B (en) Process for manufacturing a slag conditioning agent for steel desulfurization, slag conditioning agent, and use thereof
JP7756398B2 (en) Iron source manufacturing method
CN119372492B (en) Method for separating niobium from niobium-containing ore
JP7775166B2 (en) Iron source manufacturing method
RU2538791C2 (en) Method and device for production of direct iron and/or steelmaking pig iron from iron ores with high phosphorus content
JP2011236115A (en) Treatment method of steel slag
Pal et al. Development of carbon composite iron ore micropellets by using the microfines of iron ore and carbon-bearing materials in iron making
WO2023162728A1 (en) Iron source production method
WO2024062922A1 (en) Method for producing iron source
RU2562016C1 (en) Method of preparation to processing of sideritic iron ore (versions) and method of its following waste-free processing
US20250146091A1 (en) Method for treating steel mill slag

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 23759733

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 23759733

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1