WO2023008413A1 - Hot work tool steel having excellent high-temperature strength and toughness - Google Patents
Hot work tool steel having excellent high-temperature strength and toughness Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2023008413A1 WO2023008413A1 PCT/JP2022/028733 JP2022028733W WO2023008413A1 WO 2023008413 A1 WO2023008413 A1 WO 2023008413A1 JP 2022028733 W JP2022028733 W JP 2022028733W WO 2023008413 A1 WO2023008413 A1 WO 2023008413A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- work tool
- tool steel
- hot work
- less
- max
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D9/00—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D9/00—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
- C21D9/22—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for drills; for milling cutters; for machine cutting tools
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/46—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/58—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/25—Process efficiency
Definitions
- the present invention relates to hot work tool steel excellent in high-temperature strength and toughness, which is used as hot tools such as hot forging dies.
- Hot tools for example, molds for hot press forging, hot extrusion or die casting are generally made of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) SKD61 steel, and molds for hot hammer forging are made of JIS SKT4 steel is commonly used.
- JIS SKD61 steel is a mold steel that has both strength and toughness at a relatively high level.
- the toughness of JIS SKD61 steel is insufficient to suppress the extension of thermal fatigue cracks.
- JIS SKT4 steel emphasizes toughness so that it can withstand a large impact from hammer forging, but it lacks wear resistance due to its low softening resistance.
- the hardenability is low, causing a decrease in hardness at the center, and cracks and settling occur due to lack of strength. Furthermore, due to its low applicable hardness, it lacks wear resistance and strength, and is not suitable for hot press forging and hot extrusion applications.
- Patent Document 1 does not consider the carbide precipitation state before the hot work tool steel is used as a hot work tool in hot (high temperature) conditions (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "before high temperature use”). , the high temperature strength was insufficient.
- Patent Document 2 in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.70%, Si: 0.10 to 2.00%, Mn ⁇ 2.00%, Cr ⁇ 7.00%, W and Mo (1/2 W + Mo): 0.20 to 12.00%, V ⁇ 3.00%, S: less than 0.005%, O is less than 30 ppm, and the balance is substantially Fe
- a hot working tool having a composition of
- Patent Document 2 neither the range of component fluctuations nor the state of carbide precipitation before high-temperature use was considered, and the toughness was insufficient.
- Hot work tool steel exhibits softening resistance, that is, high-temperature strength, due to the precipitation of carbides (e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc., where M represents a metal element) and carbonitrides when used at high temperatures. can get.
- carbides e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.
- M represents a metal element
- the amount of carbides (e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.) and carbonitrides during high-temperature use decreases, and high-temperature No strength.
- the toughness is lowered.
- the problem to be solved by the present invention is to limit the quenching conditions so that the M 23 C 6 -based carbides, which may remain after pressing and have a small contribution to high-temperature strength, are dissolved in the quenching process. At the same time, it is to obtain excellent toughness by controlling the width of component variation. Then, the solid solution of M 23 C 6 carbides in the quenching process increases the carbon content in the matrix, and fine carbides (such as MC It is to obtain excellent high -temperature strength by precipitating fine carbonitrides and fine carbonitrides. That is, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a hot work tool steel having toughness and high temperature strength.
- the present inventors have made intensive development, and as a result, by specifying the alloy composition, quenching conditions, carbide state and the range of composition fluctuation, heat It has been found that a tool steel can be obtained.
- the present invention provides the following hot work tool steel.
- Hot work tool steel wherein the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more per 10000 ⁇ m 2 in the hot work tool steel before use is 150 or less.
- the hot work tool steel is represented by the following formulas 1-4: ([C] max- [C] min )/[C] ⁇ 1.0 (1) ([Cr] max-[Cr]min ) /[Cr] ⁇ 0.5 (2) ([Mo]max-[Mo] min )/[Mo] ⁇ 1.5 (3) ([V]max-[V] min )/[V] ⁇ 1.5 (4) [In the formula, [C] max and [C] min represent the maximum and minimum concentrations of C determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, [Cr] max and [ Cr] min represent the maximum and minimum Cr concentrations, respectively, determined in concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, and [Mo] max and [Mo] min , respectively, [V] max and [V] min represent the highest and lowest concentrations of Mo determined in the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the analysis method, and [V] max and [V] min are respectively the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the electron probe microanalysis
- a hot work tool steel having both high-temperature strength and toughness, such as a reduction in hardness from the initial hardness of 14 HRC or less, and an impact value of 70 J/cm 2 or more in a Charpy impact test. .
- hot work tool steel before being used in hot as hot work tools such as hot forging dies
- hot work tool steel before use The hot tool is, for example, for the purpose of improving workability, or for the purpose of structure control for obtaining desired properties after hot working.
- the vicinity of the surface is exposed to a considerable temperature (for example, 180 to 1300° C.) due to heat transfer from the surface.
- C 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less
- C is a component for ensuring sufficient hardenability and for obtaining high-temperature strength, hardness and wear resistance by forming carbides and carbonitrides. If C is less than 0.20%, sufficient high-temperature strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when C exceeds 0.60%, solidification segregation is promoted, coarse carbides and carbonitrides are formed, and toughness is lowered. In addition, the resulting carbides remain undissolved during quenching, reducing the amount of precipitated carbides and carbonitrides when used as a hot work tool steel at high temperatures, and an improvement in high-temperature strength cannot be expected. Therefore, C should be 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less. Preferably, C is 0.40% or more and 0.60% or less.
- Si 0.10% or more and less than 0.30%
- Si is a component necessary for securing the deoxidizing effect and hardenability in steelmaking. If the Si content is less than 0.10%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. On the other hand, when Si is 0.30% or more, the toughness is lowered. Therefore, Si should be 0.10% or more and less than 0.30%. Preferably, Si is 0.10% or more and 0.20% or less.
- Mn 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less
- Mn is a component necessary for securing the deoxidizing effect and hardenability in steelmaking. If Mn is less than 0.50%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. If the Mn content is more than 2.00%, workability is lowered. Therefore, Mn should be 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less. Preferably, Mn is 0.50% or more and 1.40% or less.
- Ni 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less
- Ni is a component necessary for ensuring hardenability and improving toughness. If Ni is less than 0.50%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. Above 2.50% Ni, the cost becomes too high. Therefore, Ni should be 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less. Preferably, Ni is 1.10% or more and 2.30% or less.
- Cr 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less Cr is a component necessary for ensuring sufficient hardenability. If Cr is less than 1.6%, sufficient hardenability cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when Cr is added in an amount of more than 2.6%, M 23 C 6 -based carbides mainly composed of Cr and Fe are excessively formed during quenching and tempering, deteriorating high-temperature strength, softening resistance and toughness. Therefore, Cr should be 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less. Preferably, Cr is 1.6% or more and 2.4% or less.
- Mo 0.3% to 2.0% Mo is a useful component for obtaining precipitated carbides that contribute to hardenability, secondary hardening and high-temperature strength. If Mo is less than 0.3%, sufficient effects cannot be obtained. When Mo is more than 2.0%, not only does the effect saturate even if it is excessively added, but also the toughness is reduced due to coarse aggregation of carbides. Moreover, it becomes costly. Therefore, Mo should be 0.3% or more and 2.0% or less. Preferably, Mo is 0.3% or more and 1.7% or less.
- V 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less V precipitates fine, hard carbides and fine, hard carbonitrides during tempering or when used as hot work tool steel at high temperatures, resulting in strength and wear resistance. It is a component that contributes to If V is less than 0.05%, these effects cannot be sufficiently obtained. If V is more than 0.80%, coarse carbides and carbonitrides crystallize during solidification, impairing toughness. Therefore, V is set to 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less. Preferably, V is 0.05% or more and 0.20% or less.
- Value A 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less
- the hot work tool steel before use has been quenched and tempered so that the value A is 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less.
- Value A is calculated based on Equation A below.
- Value A ([T] + 273) (log 10 [t] + 24) / 1000 (A)
- [T] represents the quenching temperature (°C)
- [t] represents the quenching temperature holding time (h). That is, when obtaining the value A, the numerical value of the quenching temperature (°C) is substituted for [T] in Formula A, and the numerical value of the quenching temperature holding time (h) is substituted for [t] in Formula A. do.
- the value A is an index for ensuring the solid solubility of carbide by specifying the quenching temperature and holding time. If the value A is less than 27.4, solid solution of carbides due to quenching of the steel of the composition of the present invention becomes insufficient, resulting in insufficient toughness and high-temperature strength when used as a hot tool at high temperatures. On the other hand, if the value A exceeds 29.3, the prior austenite crystal grains become coarse, resulting in a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the value A is set to 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less.
- Carbides e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.
- carbonitrides contribute to the improvement of high-temperature strength by precipitating during high-temperature use as hot work tool steel, so these are reduced. As a result, sufficient high-temperature strength cannot be obtained.
- the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more per 10000 ⁇ m 2 is 150 or less.
- the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more per 10,000 ⁇ m 2 is measured using a steel material after quenching and tempering, as described in the Examples.
- the carbides to be measured are, for example, MC-based carbides, M2C-based carbides, M3C - based carbides , M7C3 - based carbides, M23C6 - based carbides, and the like.
- M represents a metal element.
- the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more per 10000 ⁇ m 2 is measured according to the method described in the Examples.
- the hot work tool steel prior to use has the following formulas 1-4: ([C] max- [C] min )/[C] ⁇ 1.0 (1) ([Cr] max-[Cr]min ) /[Cr] ⁇ 0.5 (2) ([Mo]max-[Mo] min )/[Mo] ⁇ 1.5 (3) ([V]max-[V] min )/[V] ⁇ 1.5 (4) is preferably satisfied.
- [C] max and [C] min are the highest concentration (% by mass) and lowest concentration (% by mass) of C determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, respectively.
- [Cr] max and [Cr] min are respectively the maximum Cr concentration (% by mass) and the minimum concentration (% by mass) determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method.
- [Mo] max and [Mo] min represent the highest concentration (% by mass) and the lowest concentration (% by mass) of Mo determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, respectively
- [V] max and [V] min respectively represent the highest concentration (% by mass) and lowest concentration (% by mass) of V determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method
- [C ] represents the C content (% by mass) determined by the composition analysis of the hot work tool steel by the infrared absorption method
- [Cr], [Mo] and [V] are each determined by the fluorescent X-ray analysis method. The contents of Cr, Mo and V (% by mass) determined by composition analysis of hot work tool steel are shown.
- the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] is an index of the variation in composition due to internal segregation of each alloying element.
- the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] may be referred to as "the width of the component variation of the alloying element X". If the variation in composition due to internal segregation of each alloying element is large (that is, the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] is large), the difference in distribution of carbides and carbonitrides and the difference in deformability Since it becomes large, it will reduce toughness. Therefore, it is preferable to regulate the range of component variation for C, Cr, Mo and V. That is, the hot work tool steel before use preferably satisfies all of formulas 1 to 4.
- composition analysis of the steel material by the infrared absorption method analysis of the content of C
- composition analysis of the steel material by the fluorescent X-ray analysis method analysis of the content of Cr, Mo and V
- C determined by the infrared absorption method [C] is the content (% by mass) of Cr
- [Cr] and [Mo] and [V] are the contents (% by mass) of Cr, Mo and V determined by fluorescent X-ray analysis, respectively.
- Concentration mapping by the electron probe microanalysis method, composition analysis by the infrared absorption method and fluorescent X-ray analysis method are performed according to the methods described in Examples.
- the application of the soaking treatment in which the center of the steel ingot is soaked for 10 to 40 hours in the range of 1225°C to 1300°C makes it possible to effectively reduce the value of component fluctuation.
- Invention Examples Nos. 1 to 28 and Comparative Examples Nos. 29 to 40 are steels each having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities. 100 kg of each steel was melted in a vacuum induction melting furnace (VIM) and cast into ingots. Invention Steel No. For Nos. 1 to 20, soaking treatment was performed under the above conditions (that is, soaking treatment in which the center of the steel ingot was soaked at 1225° C. to 1300° C. for 10 to 40 hours). After that, these ingots were heated to 1220° C. and forged into square bars of 15 mm square (15 mm ⁇ 15 mm).
- EPMA was performed under the following conditions.
- Analyzer EPMA1600 manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation Accelerating voltage: 15 kV Beam diameter: 2 ⁇ m
- Scan mode Stage scan Step size (measured area once): 2.5 ⁇ m ⁇ 2.5 ⁇ m Number of steps (number of measurement points): 200 x 200 Measurement time (1 step): 50ms Analysis crystal: C LS12L Mo PET Cr, V LIF
- composition analysis analysis of C content
- composition analysis analysis of Cr, Mo and V content
- composition analysis by the infrared absorption method was carried out based on the "infrared absorption method" of JIS Z 2615: 2015 “general rules for carbon determination method of metal materials” using Horiba's carbon sulfur analyzer EMIA-Expert.
- Composition analysis by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy was performed based on JIS G 1256:2013 "Iron and steel - X-ray fluorescence analysis method" using MXF-2400 manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation.
- the highest concentration (% by mass) and the lowest concentration (% by mass) of the alloying element X determined by concentration mapping are set to [X] max and [X] min , respectively, and the content of C (% by mass) determined by the infrared absorption method ) is [C], the contents of Cr, Mo and V (% by mass) determined by fluorescent X-ray analysis are respectively [Cr], [Mo] and [V], and ([X] max - [ The value of X] min )/[X] was calculated as the width of component variation.
- Tables 3A to 3D show the evaluation results of the width of component variation.
- Comparative example no. No. 29 had a low high-temperature strength due to a small amount of C. Comparative example no. In No. 30, the amount of C was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low. Comparative example no. In No. 31, the amount of Si was large and the toughness was low. Comparative example no. In No. 32, the amount of Ni was small and the toughness was low. Comparative example no. In No. 33, the Cr content was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 ⁇ m or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、熱間鍛造金型等の熱間工具として使用される、高温強度及び靭性に優れた熱間工具鋼に関する。 The present invention relates to hot work tool steel excellent in high-temperature strength and toughness, which is used as hot tools such as hot forging dies.
熱間プレス鍛造、熱間押出し又はダイカスト用の熱間工具(例えば、金型)には、一般的に、日本産業規格(JIS)SKD61鋼が、熱間ハンマー鍛造用の金型には、JIS SKT4鋼が汎用的に使用されている。JIS SKD61鋼は、強度及び靭性の双方を比較的高位で兼備した金型用鋼ではあるが、使用中の割れによる早期破損が生じることが多く、靭性面では必ずしも十分ではない。また、JIS SKD61鋼の靭性は、熱疲労き裂の伸展を抑制するためには不足している。JIS SKT4鋼は、ハンマー鍛造による大きな衝撃にも耐え得るように靭性を重視している一方で、軟化抵抗性が低いために耐摩耗性が不足している。また、再生加工を目的とした型彫り面の引下げを繰返して行うと、焼入性が低いために中心部では硬さ低下が生じてしまい、強度不足から割れ、ヘタリ等が発生する。さらには、適用可能な硬さが低いために耐摩耗性及び強度が不足し、熱間プレス鍛造及び熱間押出の用途には向いていない。 Hot tools (for example, molds) for hot press forging, hot extrusion or die casting are generally made of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) SKD61 steel, and molds for hot hammer forging are made of JIS SKT4 steel is commonly used. JIS SKD61 steel is a mold steel that has both strength and toughness at a relatively high level. In addition, the toughness of JIS SKD61 steel is insufficient to suppress the extension of thermal fatigue cracks. JIS SKT4 steel emphasizes toughness so that it can withstand a large impact from hammer forging, but it lacks wear resistance due to its low softening resistance. In addition, if the die surface is repeatedly lowered for the purpose of reprocessing, the hardenability is low, causing a decrease in hardness at the center, and cracks and settling occur due to lack of strength. Furthermore, due to its low applicable hardness, it lacks wear resistance and strength, and is not suitable for hot press forging and hot extrusion applications.
特許文献1では、質量%で、C:0.37~0.45%、Si:0.3~1.2%、Mn:0.6~1.5%、Ni:0.3~1.0%、Cr:1.0~2.0%、Mo:1.1~1.4%、V:0.1~0.3%、及び、残部Fe及び不可避不純物からなり、合金成分の式L及び式Yの値を特定の範囲に規定する熱間工具鋼が提案されている。なお、式Lは、-0.4×Si-9.7×Mn+3.7×Ni+54.4×Moであり、式Lの値は54~65である。また、式Yは、-17.1×C+0.1×Si+0.2×Mn+0.2×Ni+0.5×Cr+Mo+5.0であり、式Yの値は0.0以上である。 In Patent Document 1, in mass %, C: 0.37 to 0.45%, Si: 0.3 to 1.2%, Mn: 0.6 to 1.5%, Ni: 0.3 to 1.5%. 0%, Cr: 1.0 to 2.0%, Mo: 1.1 to 1.4%, V: 0.1 to 0.3%, and the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities, formula of alloy components Hot work tool steels have been proposed in which the values of L and formula Y are defined within specific ranges. The formula L is −0.4×Si−9.7×Mn+3.7×Ni+54.4×Mo, and the value of the formula L is 54-65. The formula Y is −17.1×C+0.1×Si+0.2×Mn+0.2×Ni+0.5×Cr+Mo+5.0, and the value of the formula Y is 0.0 or more.
しかしながら、特許文献1では、熱間工具鋼が熱間工具として熱間(高温)で使用される前(以下「高温使用前」という場合がある。)の炭化物析出状態については考慮されておらず、高温強度が不十分であった。 However, Patent Document 1 does not consider the carbide precipitation state before the hot work tool steel is used as a hot work tool in hot (high temperature) conditions (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "before high temperature use"). , the high temperature strength was insufficient.
また、特許文献2では、質量%で、C:0.10~0.70%、Si:0.10~2.00%、Mn≦2.00%、Cr≦7.00%、W及びMoの単独又は複合で(1/2W+Mo):0.20~12.00%、V≦3.00%、さらにS:0.005%未満、Oが30ppm未満であり、残部が実質的にFeからなる組成の熱間加工用工具が提案されている。 In addition, in Patent Document 2, in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.70%, Si: 0.10 to 2.00%, Mn ≤ 2.00%, Cr ≤ 7.00%, W and Mo (1/2 W + Mo): 0.20 to 12.00%, V ≤ 3.00%, S: less than 0.005%, O is less than 30 ppm, and the balance is substantially Fe A hot working tool having a composition of
しかしながら、特許文献2では、成分変動の幅及び高温使用前の炭化物析出状態についてはいずれも考慮されておらず、靭性が不十分であった。 However, in Patent Document 2, neither the range of component fluctuations nor the state of carbide precipitation before high-temperature use was considered, and the toughness was insufficient.
熱間工具鋼は、高温使用時に炭化物(例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物等、Mは、金属元素を表す。)及び炭窒化物が析出することで軟化抵抗、すなわち、高温強度が得られる。しかしながら、高温使用前の段階でM23C6系炭化物が多いと、高温使用中の炭化物(例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物等)及び炭窒化物の析出量が減少し、高い高温強度が得られない。また、高温使用前に粗大な炭化物が多く存在すると、靱性が低くなるといった問題がある。 Hot work tool steel exhibits softening resistance, that is, high-temperature strength, due to the precipitation of carbides (e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc., where M represents a metal element) and carbonitrides when used at high temperatures. can get. However, if there is a large amount of M 23 C 6 -based carbides at the stage before high-temperature use, the amount of carbides (e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.) and carbonitrides during high-temperature use decreases, and high-temperature No strength. Further, if a large amount of coarse carbides are present before high-temperature use, there is a problem that the toughness is lowered.
そこで、本発明が解決しようとする課題は、焼入れ条件を限定することで、圧鍛後に残存し得る、高温強度への寄与が小さいM23C6系炭化物を焼入れ工程にて固溶させ、これと同時に成分変動の幅を制御することで優れた靱性を得ることである。そして、焼入れ工程におけるM23C6系炭化物の固溶により、マトリックス中の炭素量を増加させ、熱間工具鋼として高温使用中に、高温強度への寄与が大きい、微細な炭化物(例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物等)及び微細な炭窒化物を析出させることで、優れた高温強度を得ることである。すなわち、本発明が解決しようとする課題は、靭性及び高温強度を備えた熱間工具鋼を提供することである。 Therefore, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to limit the quenching conditions so that the M 23 C 6 -based carbides, which may remain after pressing and have a small contribution to high-temperature strength, are dissolved in the quenching process. At the same time, it is to obtain excellent toughness by controlling the width of component variation. Then, the solid solution of M 23 C 6 carbides in the quenching process increases the carbon content in the matrix, and fine carbides (such as MC It is to obtain excellent high -temperature strength by precipitating fine carbonitrides and fine carbonitrides. That is, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a hot work tool steel having toughness and high temperature strength.
上述した課題を解消するために、本発明者らは鋭意開発を進めた結果、合金成分、焼入れ条件、炭化物状態及び成分変動の幅を規定することで、優れた高温強度及び靭性を兼備する熱間工具鋼が得られることを見出した。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present inventors have made intensive development, and as a result, by specifying the alloy composition, quenching conditions, carbide state and the range of composition fluctuation, heat It has been found that a tool steel can be obtained.
すなわち、上述した課題を解決するために、本発明は、以下の熱間工具鋼を提供する。
[1]質量%で、
C:0.20%以上0.60%以下、
Si:0.10%以上0.30%未満、
Mn:0.50%以上2.00%以下、
Ni:0.50%以上2.50%以下、
Cr:1.6%以上2.6%以下、
Mo:0.3%以上2.0%以下、
V:0.05%以上0.80%以下、及び
残部:Fe及び不可避的不純物
からなる熱間工具鋼であって、
熱間工具鋼が、以下の式A:
値A=([T]+273)(log10[t]+24)/1000 ・・・(A)
[式中、[T]は焼入温度(℃)を表し、[t]は焼入温度保持時間(h)を表す。]
に基づいて算出される値Aが27.4以上29.3以下となるように焼入焼戻しされた状態であり、
使用前の熱間工具鋼における10000μm2当たりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物の個数が150個以下である、熱間工具鋼。
[2]熱間工具鋼が、以下の式1~4:
([C]max-[C]min)/[C]≦1.0 ・・・(1)
([Cr]max-[Cr]min)/[Cr]≦0.5 ・・・(2)
([Mo]max-[Mo]min)/[Mo]≦1.5 ・・・(3)
([V]max-[V]min)/[V]≦1.5 ・・・(4)
[式中、[C]max及び[C]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[Cr]max及び[Cr]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCrの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[Mo]max及び[Mo]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたMoの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[V]max及び[V]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたVの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[C]は、赤外線吸収法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCの含有率を表し、[Cr]、[Mo]及び[V]は、それぞれ、蛍光X線分析方法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCr、Mo及びVの含有率を表す。]
を満たす、[1]に記載の熱間工具鋼。
That is, in order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention provides the following hot work tool steel.
[1] % by mass,
C: 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less,
Si: 0.10% or more and less than 0.30%,
Mn: 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less,
Ni: 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less,
Cr: 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less,
Mo: 0.3% or more and 2.0% or less,
V: 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less, and the balance: a hot work tool steel consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities,
The hot work tool steel has the following formula A:
Value A=([T]+273)( log10 [t]+24)/1000 (A)
[In the formula, [T] represents the quenching temperature (°C), and [t] represents the quenching temperature holding time (h). ]
It is in a state of being quenched and tempered so that the value A calculated based on is 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less,
Hot work tool steel, wherein the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10000 μm 2 in the hot work tool steel before use is 150 or less.
[2] The hot work tool steel is represented by the following formulas 1-4:
([C] max- [C] min )/[C]≤1.0 (1)
([Cr] max-[Cr]min ) /[Cr]≦0.5 (2)
([Mo]max-[Mo] min )/[Mo] ≤1.5 (3)
([V]max-[V] min )/[V] ≤1.5 (4)
[In the formula, [C] max and [C] min represent the maximum and minimum concentrations of C determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, [Cr] max and [ Cr] min represent the maximum and minimum Cr concentrations, respectively, determined in concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, and [Mo] max and [Mo] min , respectively, [V] max and [V] min represent the highest and lowest concentrations of Mo determined in the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the analysis method, and [V] max and [V] min are respectively the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the electron probe microanalysis method. represents the maximum concentration and minimum concentration of V determined in, [C] represents the content of C determined by composition analysis of hot work tool steel by infrared absorption method, [Cr], [Mo] and [ V] respectively represent the contents of Cr, Mo and V determined by the composition analysis of the hot work tool steel by the fluorescent X-ray analysis method. ]
The hot work tool steel according to [1], which satisfies
本発明によれば、初期硬さからの減少幅が14HRC以内である、シャルピー衝撃試験も衝撃値が70J/cm2以上である等、高温強度及び靭性を兼備した熱間工具鋼が提供される。 According to the present invention, there is provided a hot work tool steel having both high-temperature strength and toughness, such as a reduction in hardness from the initial hardness of 14 HRC or less, and an impact value of 70 J/cm 2 or more in a Charpy impact test. .
成分変動の幅を規定して良好に制御すると、内部偏析が小さく、シャルピー衝撃試験の衝撃値が85J/cm2以上となるので、より靭性が良好な熱間工具鋼を得ることができる。 If the range of component variation is specified and well controlled, the internal segregation is small and the impact value in the Charpy impact test is 85 J/cm 2 or more, so hot work tool steel with better toughness can be obtained.
本明細書において、熱間鍛造金型等の熱間工具として熱間(高温)で使用される前の熱間工具鋼を「使用前の熱間工具鋼」と称する。熱間工具は、例えば、加工性向上を目的に、又は、熱間加工後に所望の特性を得るための組織制御等を目的に、高温に加熱された被加工材と接触するため、被加工材からの熱移動により表面近傍が相当の温度(例えば180~1300℃)に曝されて使用される。 In this specification, hot work tool steel before being used in hot (high temperature) as hot work tools such as hot forging dies is referred to as "hot work tool steel before use". The hot tool is, for example, for the purpose of improving workability, or for the purpose of structure control for obtaining desired properties after hot working. The vicinity of the surface is exposed to a considerable temperature (for example, 180 to 1300° C.) due to heat transfer from the surface.
以下、本発明の熱間工具鋼において、化学成分を規定する理由、値Aを規定する理由、及び炭化物の個数を規定する理由について説明する。なお、化学成分における%は質量%を示す。 The reason for specifying the chemical composition, the reason for specifying the value A, and the reason for specifying the number of carbides in the hot work tool steel of the present invention will be described below. In addition, % in a chemical component shows the mass %.
C:0.20%以上0.60%以下
Cは、十分な焼入性を確保し、炭化物及び炭窒化物を形成させることで高温強度、硬度及び耐摩耗性を得るための成分である。Cが0.20%未満であると、十分な高温強度が得られない。他方、Cが0.60%を超えると、凝固偏析を助長し、粗大な炭化物及び炭窒化物が生じ、靭性が低下する。また、生じた炭化物が焼入れ時に未固溶で残存することで、熱間工具鋼として高温使用時の炭化物及び炭窒化物の析出量が減少し、高温強度の向上が望めない。そこで、Cは0.20%以上0.60%以下とする。好ましくは、Cは0.40%以上0.60%以下である。
C: 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less C is a component for ensuring sufficient hardenability and for obtaining high-temperature strength, hardness and wear resistance by forming carbides and carbonitrides. If C is less than 0.20%, sufficient high-temperature strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when C exceeds 0.60%, solidification segregation is promoted, coarse carbides and carbonitrides are formed, and toughness is lowered. In addition, the resulting carbides remain undissolved during quenching, reducing the amount of precipitated carbides and carbonitrides when used as a hot work tool steel at high temperatures, and an improvement in high-temperature strength cannot be expected. Therefore, C should be 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less. Preferably, C is 0.40% or more and 0.60% or less.
Si:0.10%以上0.30%未満
Siは、製鋼での脱酸効果及び焼入性の確保に必要な成分である。Siが0.10%未満であると、十分な効果を発揮しない。他方、Siが0.30%以上であると、靭性の低下を招く。そこで、Siは0.10%以上0.30%未満とする。好ましくは、Siは0.10%以上0.20%以下である。
Si: 0.10% or more and less than 0.30% Si is a component necessary for securing the deoxidizing effect and hardenability in steelmaking. If the Si content is less than 0.10%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. On the other hand, when Si is 0.30% or more, the toughness is lowered. Therefore, Si should be 0.10% or more and less than 0.30%. Preferably, Si is 0.10% or more and 0.20% or less.
Mn:0.50%以上2.00%以下
Mnは、製鋼での脱酸効果及び焼入性の確保に必要な成分である。Mnが0.50%未満であると十分な効果を発揮しない。Mnが2.00%より多いと、加工性の低下を招く。そこで、Mnは0.50%以上2.00%以下とする。好ましくは、Mnは0.50%以上1.40%以下である。
Mn: 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less Mn is a component necessary for securing the deoxidizing effect and hardenability in steelmaking. If Mn is less than 0.50%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. If the Mn content is more than 2.00%, workability is lowered. Therefore, Mn should be 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less. Preferably, Mn is 0.50% or more and 1.40% or less.
Ni:0.50%以上2.50%以下
Niは、焼入性の確保及び靱性の向上のために必要な成分である。Niが0.50%未満であると、十分な効果を発揮しない。Niが2.50%より多いと、コストが大きくなりすぎる。そこで、Niは0.50%以上2.50%以下とする。好ましくは、Niは1.10%以上2.30%以下である。
Ni: 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less Ni is a component necessary for ensuring hardenability and improving toughness. If Ni is less than 0.50%, sufficient effects are not exhibited. Above 2.50% Ni, the cost becomes too high. Therefore, Ni should be 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less. Preferably, Ni is 1.10% or more and 2.30% or less.
Cr:1.6%以上2.6%以下
Crは、十分な焼入性の確保に必要な成分である。Crが1.6%未満では十分な焼入性が得られない。他方、Crを2.6%より多く添加すると、焼入焼戻し時にCr及びFeを主体とするM23C6系の炭化物が過多に形成され、高温強度、軟化抵抗性及び靱性を低下させる。そこで、Crは1.6%以上2.6%以下とする。好ましくは、Crは1.6%以上2.4%以下である。
Cr: 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less Cr is a component necessary for ensuring sufficient hardenability. If Cr is less than 1.6%, sufficient hardenability cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when Cr is added in an amount of more than 2.6%, M 23 C 6 -based carbides mainly composed of Cr and Fe are excessively formed during quenching and tempering, deteriorating high-temperature strength, softening resistance and toughness. Therefore, Cr should be 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less. Preferably, Cr is 1.6% or more and 2.4% or less.
Mo:0.3%以上2.0%以下
Moは、焼入性、二次硬化及び高温強度に寄与する析出炭化物を得るために有用な成分である。Moが0.3%未満であると、十分な効果が得られない。Moが2.0%より多いと、過剰に添加しても効果が飽和するばかりか、炭化物が粗大凝集することにより靭性を低下させる。また、コスト高になる。そこで、Moは0.3%以上2.0%以下とする。好ましくは、Moは0.3%以上1.7%以下である。
Mo: 0.3% to 2.0% Mo is a useful component for obtaining precipitated carbides that contribute to hardenability, secondary hardening and high-temperature strength. If Mo is less than 0.3%, sufficient effects cannot be obtained. When Mo is more than 2.0%, not only does the effect saturate even if it is excessively added, but also the toughness is reduced due to coarse aggregation of carbides. Moreover, it becomes costly. Therefore, Mo should be 0.3% or more and 2.0% or less. Preferably, Mo is 0.3% or more and 1.7% or less.
V:0.05%以上0.80%以下
Vは、焼戻し時又は熱間工具鋼として高温使用中に、微細で硬質な炭化物及び微細で硬質な炭窒化物を析出し、強度及び耐摩耗性に寄与する成分である。Vが0.05%より少ないと、これらの効果が十分には得られない。Vが0.80%より多いと、凝固時に粗大な炭化物及び炭窒化物が晶出し、靭性を阻害する。そこで、Vは0.05%以上0.80%以下とする。好ましくは、Vは0.05%以上0.20%以下である。
V: 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less V precipitates fine, hard carbides and fine, hard carbonitrides during tempering or when used as hot work tool steel at high temperatures, resulting in strength and wear resistance. It is a component that contributes to If V is less than 0.05%, these effects cannot be sufficiently obtained. If V is more than 0.80%, coarse carbides and carbonitrides crystallize during solidification, impairing toughness. Therefore, V is set to 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less. Preferably, V is 0.05% or more and 0.20% or less.
値A:27.4以上29.3以下
使用前の熱間工具鋼は、値Aが27.4以上29.3以下となるように焼入焼戻しされた状態である。
Value A: 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less The hot work tool steel before use has been quenched and tempered so that the value A is 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less.
値Aは、以下の式Aに基づいて算出される。
値A=([T]+273)(log10[t]+24)/1000 ・・・(A)
式Aにおいて、[T]は焼入温度(℃)を表し、[t]は焼入温度保持時間(h)を表す。
すなわち、値Aを求める際、式A中の[T]には焼入温度(℃)の数値を代入し、式A中の[t]には焼入温度保持時間(h)の数値を代入する。
Value A is calculated based on Equation A below.
Value A = ([T] + 273) (log 10 [t] + 24) / 1000 (A)
In Formula A, [T] represents the quenching temperature (°C), and [t] represents the quenching temperature holding time (h).
That is, when obtaining the value A, the numerical value of the quenching temperature (°C) is substituted for [T] in Formula A, and the numerical value of the quenching temperature holding time (h) is substituted for [t] in Formula A. do.
値Aは、焼入温度及び保持時間を規定することで、炭化物の固溶性を確保するための指標である。値Aが27.4未満となると、本発明の成分における鋼の焼入れによる炭化物の固溶が不十分となるので、熱間工具として高温使用する際の靭性及び高温強度が不足する。他方、値Aが29.3を超えると、旧オーステナイト結晶粒の粗大化により靭性が低下する。そこで、値Aを27.4以上29.3以下とする。 The value A is an index for ensuring the solid solubility of carbide by specifying the quenching temperature and holding time. If the value A is less than 27.4, solid solution of carbides due to quenching of the steel of the composition of the present invention becomes insufficient, resulting in insufficient toughness and high-temperature strength when used as a hot tool at high temperatures. On the other hand, if the value A exceeds 29.3, the prior austenite crystal grains become coarse, resulting in a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the value A is set to 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less.
10000μm 2 当たりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物の個数:150個以下
使用前の熱間工具鋼において、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物が多すぎると、マトリックス中の炭素量が不足し、熱間工具鋼として高温使用中に析出する炭化物(例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物等)及び炭窒化物の量が減少する。炭化物(例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物等)及び炭窒化物は、熱間工具鋼として高温使用中に析出することで高温強度向上に寄与しているので、これらが減少してしまうと、十分な高温強度が得られないこととなる。また、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物が多すぎると応力が集中し、割れの起点及び伝ぱ経路として作用するため、靱性を阻害することとなる。そこで、使用前の熱間工具鋼において、10000μm2当たりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物の個数を150個以下とする。
Number of carbides with an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10000 μm 2 : 150 or less The amounts of carbides (eg, MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.) and carbonitrides precipitated during use as steel at high temperatures are reduced. Carbides (e.g., MC-based carbides, M 2 C-based carbides, etc.) and carbonitrides contribute to the improvement of high-temperature strength by precipitating during high-temperature use as hot work tool steel, so these are reduced. As a result, sufficient high-temperature strength cannot be obtained. Also, if there are too many carbides with an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more, stress concentrates and acts as a starting point and propagation path for cracks, which impairs toughness. Therefore, in the hot work tool steel before use, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10000 μm 2 is 150 or less.
10,000μm2当りの円相当径1μm以上の大きさの炭化物の個数は、実施例に記載されるように、焼入焼戻し後の鋼材を用いて計測される。計測される炭化物は、例えば、MC系炭化物、M2C系炭化物、M3C系炭化物、M7C3系炭化物、M23C6系炭化物等である。なお、Mは、金属元素を表す。 The number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10,000 μm 2 is measured using a steel material after quenching and tempering, as described in the Examples. The carbides to be measured are, for example, MC-based carbides, M2C-based carbides, M3C - based carbides , M7C3 - based carbides, M23C6 - based carbides, and the like. Note that M represents a metal element.
10000μm2当たりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物の個数の計測は、実施例に記載の方法に従って行われる。 The number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10000 μm 2 is measured according to the method described in the Examples.
使用前の熱間工具鋼は、以下の式1~4:
([C]max-[C]min)/[C]≦1.0 ・・・(1)
([Cr]max-[Cr]min)/[Cr]≦0.5 ・・・(2)
([Mo]max-[Mo]min)/[Mo]≦1.5 ・・・(3)
([V]max-[V]min)/[V]≦1.5 ・・・(4)
を満たすことが好ましい。
The hot work tool steel prior to use has the following formulas 1-4:
([C] max- [C] min )/[C]≤1.0 (1)
([Cr] max-[Cr]min ) /[Cr]≦0.5 (2)
([Mo]max-[Mo] min )/[Mo] ≤1.5 (3)
([V]max-[V] min )/[V] ≤1.5 (4)
is preferably satisfied.
式1~4において、[C]max及び[C]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)を表し、[Cr]max及び[Cr]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCrの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)を表し、[Mo]max及び[Mo]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたMoの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)を表し、[V]max及び[V]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたVの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)を表し、[C]は、赤外線吸収法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCの含有率(質量%)を表し、[Cr]、[Mo]及び[V]は、それぞれ、蛍光X線分析法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCr、Mo及びVの含有率(質量%)を表す。 In formulas 1 to 4, [C] max and [C] min are the highest concentration (% by mass) and lowest concentration (% by mass) of C determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, respectively. ), and [Cr] max and [Cr] min are respectively the maximum Cr concentration (% by mass) and the minimum concentration (% by mass) determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method. where [Mo] max and [Mo] min represent the highest concentration (% by mass) and the lowest concentration (% by mass) of Mo determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, respectively, [V] max and [V] min respectively represent the highest concentration (% by mass) and lowest concentration (% by mass) of V determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, and [C ] represents the C content (% by mass) determined by the composition analysis of the hot work tool steel by the infrared absorption method, and [Cr], [Mo] and [V] are each determined by the fluorescent X-ray analysis method. The contents of Cr, Mo and V (% by mass) determined by composition analysis of hot work tool steel are shown.
合金元素X(X=C,Cr,Mo,V)について、([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値は、各合金元素の内部偏析による成分のばらつきの指標である。本明細書において、([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値を「合金元素Xの成分変動の幅」という場合がある。各合金元素の内部偏析による成分のばらつきが大きい(すなわち、([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値が大きい)と、炭化物及び炭窒化物の分布差及び変形能差が大きくなるので、靭性を低下させることとなる。そこで、C、Cr、Mo及びVについての成分変動の幅について規制することが好ましい。すなわち、使用前の熱間工具鋼は、式1~4の全てを満たすことが好ましい。 For alloying elements X (X=C, Cr, Mo, V), the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] is an index of the variation in composition due to internal segregation of each alloying element. In this specification, the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] may be referred to as "the width of the component variation of the alloying element X". If the variation in composition due to internal segregation of each alloying element is large (that is, the value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] is large), the difference in distribution of carbides and carbonitrides and the difference in deformability Since it becomes large, it will reduce toughness. Therefore, it is preferable to regulate the range of component variation for C, Cr, Mo and V. That is, the hot work tool steel before use preferably satisfies all of formulas 1 to 4.
([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値は、実施例に記載されるように、焼入焼戻し後の鋼材を用いて求められる。鋼材のL面(鋼板の圧延方向及び板厚方向に平行な面、いわゆる長手断面)を鏡面研磨した後、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法(Electron Prove Micro Analysis:EPMA)を用いて、0.5mm×0.5mmの範囲における合金元素X(X=C,Cr,Mo,V)の濃度マッピングを行い、該濃度マッピングで決定された金属元素Xの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)をそれぞれ[X]max及び[X]minとする。赤外線吸収法による鋼材の組成分析(Cの含有率の分析)及び蛍光X線分析法による鋼材の組成分析(Cr、Mo及びVの含有率の分析)を行い、赤外線吸収法で決定されたCの含有率(質量%)を[C]とし、蛍光X線分析法で決定されたCr、Mo及びVの含有率(質量%)をそれぞれ[Cr]、[Mo]及び[V]とする。電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による濃度マッピング、赤外線吸収法及び蛍光X線分析法による組成分析は、実施例に記載の方法に従って行われる。 The value of ([X] max - [X] min )/[X] is obtained using a steel material after quenching and tempering, as described in the Examples. After mirror-polishing the L surface of the steel material (surface parallel to the rolling direction and thickness direction of the steel plate, the so-called longitudinal cross section), 0.5 mm × 0 using the electron probe micro analysis method (Electron Prove Micro Analysis: EPMA) Concentration mapping of the alloying element X (X=C, Cr, Mo, V) in the range of .5 mm is performed, and the maximum concentration (% by mass) and the minimum concentration (% by mass) of the metal element X determined by the concentration mapping are calculated. Let them be [X] max and [X] min , respectively. The composition analysis of the steel material by the infrared absorption method (analysis of the content of C) and the composition analysis of the steel material by the fluorescent X-ray analysis method (analysis of the content of Cr, Mo and V) are performed, and the C determined by the infrared absorption method [C] is the content (% by mass) of Cr, and [Cr], [Mo] and [V] are the contents (% by mass) of Cr, Mo and V determined by fluorescent X-ray analysis, respectively. Concentration mapping by the electron probe microanalysis method, composition analysis by the infrared absorption method and fluorescent X-ray analysis method are performed according to the methods described in Examples.
1225℃~1300℃の範囲で、鋼塊中心部を10~40時間均熱保持するソーキング処理の適用は、成分変動の値を効果的に小さくすることを可能にする。 The application of the soaking treatment in which the center of the steel ingot is soaked for 10 to 40 hours in the range of 1225°C to 1300°C makes it possible to effectively reduce the value of component fluctuation.
以下、実施例及び比較例に基づいて、本発明をさらに詳細に説明する。
発明例No.1~28及び比較例No.29~40は、それぞれ、表1に記載の化学成分と残部Fe及び不可避不純物とからなる鋼である。各鋼 100kgを真空誘導溶解炉(VIM)で溶製し、インゴットに造塊した。発明鋼No.1~20に関しては上記条件でソーキング処理(すなわち、1225℃~1300℃の範囲で、鋼塊中心部を10~40時間均熱保持するソーキング処理)を行った。その後、これらのインゴットを1220℃に加熱して、角15mm(15mm×15mm)の角材に鍛伸した。バルクの各鋼の成分組成は、赤外線吸収法(Cの含有率の分析)及び蛍光X線分析法(C以外の合金元素の含有率の分析)で確認した。赤外線吸収法及び蛍光X線分析法は、後述の通り行った。
The present invention will be described in further detail below based on examples and comparative examples.
Invention Examples Nos. 1 to 28 and Comparative Examples Nos. 29 to 40 are steels each having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities. 100 kg of each steel was melted in a vacuum induction melting furnace (VIM) and cast into ingots. Invention Steel No. For Nos. 1 to 20, soaking treatment was performed under the above conditions (that is, soaking treatment in which the center of the steel ingot was soaked at 1225° C. to 1300° C. for 10 to 40 hours). After that, these ingots were heated to 1220° C. and forged into square bars of 15 mm square (15 mm×15 mm). The chemical composition of each bulk steel was confirmed by an infrared absorption method (analysis of the content of C) and a fluorescent X-ray analysis method (analysis of the content of alloying elements other than C). Infrared absorption method and fluorescent X-ray analysis method were performed as described below.
その後、850~960℃に加熱し、各種時間(30分~3時間)保持することで、オーステナイト組織を得た。次いで油冷する焼入れを実施し、さらに500~700℃に加熱した後、空冷の焼戻しを2回実施し、39~41HRCに調質した。さらに機械加工にて供試材を得た。
なお、表1において、各鋼の残部は、Fe及び不可避的不純物である。
After that, it was heated to 850 to 960° C. and held for various times (30 minutes to 3 hours) to obtain an austenite structure. Then, quenching by oil cooling was performed, and after further heating to 500 to 700° C., tempering by air cooling was performed twice to refining to 39 to 41 HRC. Furthermore, test materials were obtained by machining.
In addition, in Table 1, the balance of each steel is Fe and unavoidable impurities.
(値Aの算出)
以下の式A:
値A=([T]+273)(log10[t]+24)/1000 ・・・(A)
[式中、[T]は焼入温度(℃)を表し、[t]は焼入温度保持時間(h)を表す。]
に基づいて、各鋼の値Aを算出した。各鋼の焼入温度(℃)、保持時間(h)及び値Aを表2に示す。
(Calculation of value A)
Formula A below:
Value A = ([T] + 273) (log 10 [t] + 24) / 1000 (A)
[In the formula, [T] represents the quenching temperature (°C), and [t] represents the quenching temperature holding time (h). ]
Based on, the value A of each steel was calculated. Table 2 shows the quenching temperature (°C), holding time (h) and value A of each steel.
(炭化物量の測定)
各供試材の中心をバフ研磨にて鏡面研磨した後、ピクリン酸アルコール溶液でマトリックスを腐食させ、薄い灰色又は白色に見える炭化物が多く観察される箇所を30視野選択し、電子顕微鏡にて10,000倍で観察される円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数を画像解析により計測した。10,000μm2あたりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が150個以下となったものを「A」とし、これより個数の多いものを「C」とした。炭化物量の測定結果を表2に示す。
(Measurement of carbide content)
After polishing the center of each test material to a mirror surface by buffing, the matrix is corroded with a picric acid alcohol solution, and 30 fields of view where many carbides that look light gray or white are observed are selected, and 10 are observed with an electron microscope. The number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more observed at a magnification of 1,000 was counted by image analysis. When the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10,000 μm 2 was 150 or less, it was rated as “A”, and when the number was greater than this, it was rated as “C”. Table 2 shows the measurement results of the amount of carbide.
(成分変動の幅の評価)
各供試材について、そのL面(鋼板の圧延方向及び板厚方向に平行な面、いわゆる長手断面)を鏡面研磨した後、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法(Electron Prove Micro Analysis:EPMA)を用いて、0.5mm×0.5mmの範囲における合金元素X(X=C,Cr,Mo,V)の濃度マッピングを行った。
(Evaluation of width of component variation)
For each test material, after mirror-polishing the L surface (surface parallel to the rolling direction and thickness direction of the steel plate, so-called longitudinal cross section), using Electron Prove Micro Analysis (EPMA), Concentration mapping of the alloying element X (X=C, Cr, Mo, V) in an area of 0.5 mm×0.5 mm was performed.
EPMAは、以下の条件で行った。
分析装置:株式会社島津製作所製EPMA1600
加速電圧:15kV
ビーム径:2μm
照射電流:0.1μA
スキャンモード:ステージスキャン
ステップサイズ(1回の測定面積):2.5μm×2.5μm
ステップ数(測定箇所の数):200×200
測定時間(1ステップ):50ms
分光結晶:C LS12L
Mo PET
Cr,V LIF
EPMA was performed under the following conditions.
Analyzer: EPMA1600 manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation
Accelerating voltage: 15 kV
Beam diameter: 2 μm
Irradiation current: 0.1 μA
Scan mode: Stage scan Step size (measured area once): 2.5 μm × 2.5 μm
Number of steps (number of measurement points): 200 x 200
Measurement time (1 step): 50ms
Analysis crystal: C LS12L
Mo PET
Cr, V LIF
各供試材について、赤外線吸収法による組成分析(Cの含有率の分析)及び蛍光X線分析法による組成分析(Cr、Mo及びVの含有率の分析)を行った。 For each test material, composition analysis (analysis of C content) by infrared absorption method and composition analysis (analysis of Cr, Mo and V content) by fluorescent X-ray analysis were performed.
赤外線吸収法による組成分析は、堀場製作所製炭素硫黄分析装置EMIA-Expertを用いて、JIS Z 2615:2015 「金属材料の炭素定量法通則」の「赤外線吸収法」に基づいて行った。 The composition analysis by the infrared absorption method was carried out based on the "infrared absorption method" of JIS Z 2615: 2015 "general rules for carbon determination method of metal materials" using Horiba's carbon sulfur analyzer EMIA-Expert.
蛍光X線分析法(XRF)による組成分析は、島津製作所製MXF-2400を用いて、JIS G 1256:2013 「鉄及び鋼-蛍光X線分析方法」に基づいて行った。 Composition analysis by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) was performed based on JIS G 1256:2013 "Iron and steel - X-ray fluorescence analysis method" using MXF-2400 manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation.
濃度マッピングで決定された合金元素Xの最高濃度(質量%)及び最低濃度(質量%)をそれぞれ[X]max及び[X]minとし、赤外線吸収法で決定されたCの含有率(質量%)を[C]とし、蛍光X線分析法で決定されたCr、Mo及びVの含有率(質量%)をそれぞれ[Cr]、[Mo]及び[V]とし、([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値を成分変動の幅として算出した。成分変動の幅の評価結果を表3A~表3Dに示す。 The highest concentration (% by mass) and the lowest concentration (% by mass) of the alloying element X determined by concentration mapping are set to [X] max and [X] min , respectively, and the content of C (% by mass) determined by the infrared absorption method ) is [C], the contents of Cr, Mo and V (% by mass) determined by fluorescent X-ray analysis are respectively [Cr], [Mo] and [V], and ([X] max - [ The value of X] min )/[X] was calculated as the width of component variation. Tables 3A to 3D show the evaluation results of the width of component variation.
C、Cr、Mo及びVの全ての合金元素において、([X]max-[X]min)/[X]の値が規定要件を満たす場合は、成分変動の幅の規定要件を満たす優れたものとして「A」と評価し、一成分でも変動幅が大きく、規定要件を満たさなかったものは劣るものとして「C」と評価した。成分変動の幅の評価結果を表2に示す。 In all alloying elements of C, Cr, Mo and V, if the value of ([X] max-[X]min ) /[X] satisfies the specified requirements, it is an excellent A sample was evaluated as "A" as a good product, and a sample that had a large fluctuation range even for one component and did not satisfy the prescribed requirements was evaluated as "C" as an inferior product. Table 2 shows the evaluation results of the width of component variation.
C、Cr、Mo及びVの規定要件は、以下の通りである。
([C]max-[C]min)/[C]≦1.0
([Cr]max-[Cr]min)/[Cr]≦0.5
([Mo]max-[Mo]min)/[Mo]≦1.5
([V]max-[V]min)/[V]≦1.5
The specified requirements for C, Cr, Mo and V are as follows.
([C] max- [C] min )/[C]≤1.0
([Cr] max- [Cr] min )/[Cr]≤0.5
([Mo] max-[Mo]min ) /[Mo]≤1.5
([V] max-[V]min ) /[V]≤1.5
(高温強度の評価)
各供試材のHRC硬さを測定した後、さらに600℃で100時間保持後、空冷し、室温におけるHRC硬さを測定して、初期硬さからの減少値をもって高温強度を評価した。減少値が14HRC以下となったものを「A」とし、減少値がこれより大きいものを「C」とした。高温強度の評価結果を表2に示す。
(Evaluation of high temperature strength)
After measuring the HRC hardness of each test material, it was further held at 600° C. for 100 hours and then air-cooled. A reduction value of 14 HRC or less was rated as "A", and a reduction value greater than this was rated as "C". Table 2 shows the evaluation results of high-temperature strength.
(靱性の評価)
各供試材から、JIS規定(JIS Z2242)の3号角10mm、長さ55mmからなるUノッチの試験片を形成し、試験片に対し、硬さが39~41HRCになるように焼入焼戻しを施して、常温でシャルピー衝撃試験を行うことで靱性を評価した。衝撃値70J/cm2以上となったものを「A」、特に85J/cm2以上を「A+」とし、70J/cm2未満のものを「C」とした。靱性の評価結果を表2に示す。
(Evaluation of toughness)
From each test material, a U-notch test piece of JIS standard (JIS Z2242) No. 3 square 10 mm and length 55 mm is formed, and the test piece is quenched and tempered so that the hardness is 39 to 41 HRC. The toughness was evaluated by performing a Charpy impact test at room temperature. Those with an impact value of 70 J/cm 2 or more were rated as "A", those with an impact value of 85 J/cm 2 or more were rated as "A + ", and those with an impact value of less than 70 J/cm 2 were rated as "C". Table 2 shows the toughness evaluation results.
発明例No.1~28は、表1及び表2に示すように、いずれも化学成分の規定範囲内であって、式Aの値を満足しており、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数も少ないものとなった。このため、シャルピー衝撃試験における衝撃値は70J/cm2以上を示し、靭性はA評価であり、初期硬さからの減少幅も14HRC以内で高温強度(軟化抵抗性)もAの評価であり、優れた高温強度及び靭性を兼備した熱間工具鋼が得られた。 Invention Example No. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, all of Nos. 1 to 28 are within the prescribed range of the chemical composition, satisfy the value of Formula A, and have a small number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more. rice field. For this reason, the impact value in the Charpy impact test is 70 J/cm 2 or more, the toughness is rated A, the width of decrease from the initial hardness is within 14 HRC, and the high-temperature strength (softening resistance) is also rated A. A hot work tool steel with excellent high temperature strength and toughness was obtained.
比較例No.29は、C量が少ないため、高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.30は、C量が多く、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多く、成分変動の幅が大きいため、靭性及び高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.31は、Si量が多く、靭性が低いものとなった。
比較例No.32は、Ni量が少なく、靭性が低いものとなった。
比較例No.33は、Cr量が多く、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多く、成分変動の幅が大きいため、靭性及び高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.34は、Mo量が少なく、高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.35は、Mo量が多く、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多く、成分変動の幅が大きいため、靭性及び高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.36は、V量が少なく、高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.37は、V量が多く、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多く、成分変動の幅が大きいため、靭性が低いものとなった。
比較例No.38は、式Aの値が小さく、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多いため、靭性及び高温強度が低いものとなった。
比較例No.39は、式Aの値が大きく、靭性が低いものとなった。
比較例No.40は、円相当径1μm以上の炭化物個数が多く、靭性及び高温強度が低いものとなった。
Comparative example no. No. 29 had a low high-temperature strength due to a small amount of C.
Comparative example no. In No. 30, the amount of C was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Comparative example no. In No. 31, the amount of Si was large and the toughness was low.
Comparative example no. In No. 32, the amount of Ni was small and the toughness was low.
Comparative example no. In No. 33, the Cr content was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Comparative example no. In No. 34, the amount of Mo was small and the high-temperature strength was low.
Comparative example no. In No. 35, the amount of Mo was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Comparative example no. No. 36 had a small amount of V and a low high-temperature strength.
Comparative example no. In No. 37, the amount of V was large, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, and the range of component fluctuation was large, so the toughness was low.
Comparative example no. In No. 38, the value of formula A was small and the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, so the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Comparative example no. In No. 39, the value of Formula A was large and the toughness was low.
Comparative example no. In No. 40, the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more was large, and the toughness and high-temperature strength were low.
Claims (2)
C:0.20%以上0.60%以下、
Si:0.10%以上0.30%未満、
Mn:0.50%以上2.00%以下、
Ni:0.50%以上2.50%以下、
Cr:1.6%以上2.6%以下、
Mo:0.3%以上2.0%以下、
V:0.05%以上0.80%以下、及び
残部:Fe及び不可避的不純物
からなる熱間工具鋼であって、
熱間工具鋼が、以下の式A:
値A=([T]+273)(log10[t]+24)/1000 ・・・(A)
[式中、[T]は焼入温度(℃)を表し、[t]は焼入温度保持時間(h)を表す。]
に基づいて算出される値Aが27.4以上29.3以下となるように焼入焼戻しされた状態であり、
使用前の熱間工具鋼における10000μm2当たりの円相当径1μm以上の炭化物の個数が150個以下である、熱間工具鋼。 in % by mass,
C: 0.20% or more and 0.60% or less,
Si: 0.10% or more and less than 0.30%,
Mn: 0.50% or more and 2.00% or less,
Ni: 0.50% or more and 2.50% or less,
Cr: 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less,
Mo: 0.3% or more and 2.0% or less,
V: 0.05% or more and 0.80% or less, and the balance: a hot work tool steel consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities,
The hot work tool steel has the following formula A:
Value A=([T]+273)( log10 [t]+24)/1000 (A)
[In the formula, [T] represents the quenching temperature (°C), and [t] represents the quenching temperature holding time (h). ]
It is in a state of being quenched and tempered so that the value A calculated based on is 27.4 or more and 29.3 or less,
Hot work tool steel, wherein the number of carbides having an equivalent circle diameter of 1 μm or more per 10000 μm 2 in the hot work tool steel before use is 150 or less.
([C]max-[C]min)/[C]≦1.0 ・・・(1)
([Cr]max-[Cr]min)/[Cr]≦0.5 ・・・(2)
([Mo]max-[Mo]min)/[Mo]≦1.5 ・・・(3)
([V]max-[V]min)/[V]≦1.5 ・・・(4)
[式中、[C]max及び[C]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[Cr]max及び[Cr]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたCrの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[Mo]max及び[Mo]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたMoの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[V]max及び[V]minは、それぞれ、電子プローブマイクロアナリシス法による熱間工具鋼の濃度マッピングで決定されたVの最高濃度及び最低濃度を表し、[C]は、赤外線吸収法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCの含有率を表し、[Cr]、[Mo]及び[V]は、それぞれ、蛍光X線分析法による熱間工具鋼の組成分析で決定されたCr、Mo及びVの含有率を表す。]
を満たす、請求項1に記載の熱間工具鋼。 The hot work tool steel has the following formulas 1-4:
([C] max- [C] min )/[C]≤1.0 (1)
([Cr] max-[Cr]min ) /[Cr]≦0.5 (2)
([Mo]max-[Mo] min )/[Mo] ≤1.5 (3)
([V]max-[V] min )/[V] ≤1.5 (4)
[In the formula, [C] max and [C] min represent the maximum and minimum concentrations of C determined by concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, [Cr] max and [ Cr] min represent the maximum and minimum Cr concentrations, respectively, determined in concentration mapping of hot work tool steel by the electron probe microanalysis method, and [Mo] max and [Mo] min , respectively, [V] max and [V] min represent the highest and lowest concentrations of Mo determined in the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the analysis method, and [V] max and [V] min are respectively the hot work tool steel concentration mapping by the electron probe microanalysis method. represents the maximum concentration and minimum concentration of V determined in, [C] represents the content of C determined by composition analysis of hot work tool steel by infrared absorption method, [Cr], [Mo] and [ V] respectively represent the contents of Cr, Mo and V determined by compositional analysis of hot work tool steel by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. ]
The hot work tool steel according to claim 1, which satisfies
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020247004389A KR20240041334A (en) | 2021-07-27 | 2022-07-26 | Hot-worked tool steel with excellent high-temperature strength and toughness |
| CN202280045221.3A CN117561345A (en) | 2021-07-27 | 2022-07-26 | Hot work tool steel with excellent high temperature strength and toughness |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2021-122796 | 2021-07-27 | ||
| JP2021122796A JP7220750B1 (en) | 2021-07-27 | 2021-07-27 | Hot work tool steel with excellent high-temperature strength and toughness |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2023008413A1 true WO2023008413A1 (en) | 2023-02-02 |
Family
ID=85087657
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2022/028733 Ceased WO2023008413A1 (en) | 2021-07-27 | 2022-07-26 | Hot work tool steel having excellent high-temperature strength and toughness |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7220750B1 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR20240041334A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN117561345A (en) |
| TW (1) | TW202321480A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2023008413A1 (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH11106868A (en) * | 1998-07-24 | 1999-04-20 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Tool steel for hot working |
| JP2013213255A (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2013-10-17 | Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd | Hot working die steel |
| CN104928586A (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2015-09-23 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Hot stamping die steel and production method thereof |
| JP2019019397A (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2019-02-07 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | Preharden hot tool steel excellent in machinability |
| JP2019116678A (en) * | 2017-04-19 | 2019-07-18 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Prehardened steel material, mold and mold component |
| JP2021080492A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2021-05-27 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | Hot work tool steel excellent in high-temperature strength and toughness |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6903507B2 (en) | 2017-07-15 | 2021-07-14 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | Hot tool steel with excellent hardenability and toughness |
-
2021
- 2021-07-27 JP JP2021122796A patent/JP7220750B1/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-07-26 KR KR1020247004389A patent/KR20240041334A/en active Pending
- 2022-07-26 CN CN202280045221.3A patent/CN117561345A/en active Pending
- 2022-07-26 TW TW111127903A patent/TW202321480A/en unknown
- 2022-07-26 WO PCT/JP2022/028733 patent/WO2023008413A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH11106868A (en) * | 1998-07-24 | 1999-04-20 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Tool steel for hot working |
| JP2013213255A (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2013-10-17 | Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd | Hot working die steel |
| CN104928586A (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2015-09-23 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Hot stamping die steel and production method thereof |
| JP2019116678A (en) * | 2017-04-19 | 2019-07-18 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Prehardened steel material, mold and mold component |
| JP2019019397A (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2019-02-07 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | Preharden hot tool steel excellent in machinability |
| JP2021080492A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2021-05-27 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | Hot work tool steel excellent in high-temperature strength and toughness |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2023024893A (en) | 2023-02-20 |
| JP7220750B1 (en) | 2023-02-10 |
| TW202321480A (en) | 2023-06-01 |
| KR20240041334A (en) | 2024-03-29 |
| CN117561345A (en) | 2024-02-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP7305483B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent toughness | |
| JP7479787B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent thermal conductivity | |
| JP6925781B2 (en) | Hot tool steel with excellent high temperature strength and toughness | |
| JP7629269B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent thermal conductivity | |
| WO2008032816A1 (en) | Hot-working tool steel having excellent stiffness and high-temperature strength and method for production thereof | |
| KR20190028781A (en) | High frequency quenching steel | |
| JP4267234B2 (en) | Hot rolled steel for machine structure with excellent forgeability and machinability | |
| JP7083242B2 (en) | Hot tool steel with excellent thermal conductivity | |
| CN109790602B (en) | Steel | |
| WO2007123164A1 (en) | Piston ring material for internal combustion engine | |
| JPWO2001066814A1 (en) | Steel with excellent forgeability and machinability | |
| WO2018139185A1 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent thermal conductivity | |
| JP7544488B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent manufacturability and thermal conductivity | |
| JP7214313B2 (en) | High toughness cold work tool steel with high wear resistance | |
| JP6156670B2 (en) | Hot tool and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP2018131654A (en) | Hot tool steel with excellent toughness and softening resistance | |
| JP7149250B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent high temperature strength and toughness | |
| JP2003313635A (en) | High toughness hot tool steel | |
| JP6903507B2 (en) | Hot tool steel with excellent hardenability and toughness | |
| JP7689817B2 (en) | Hot work tool steel with excellent thermal conductivity | |
| WO2023008413A1 (en) | Hot work tool steel having excellent high-temperature strength and toughness | |
| JP4302480B2 (en) | High hardness steel with excellent cold workability | |
| JP2022143564A (en) | Hot work tool steel having excellent softening resistance and quenchability | |
| CN116970863B (en) | High-thermal-conductivity hot-work die steel and preparation method and application thereof | |
| JP2005281857A (en) | Raw material for nitrided component having excellent broaching workability and method for manufacturing nitrided component using the raw material |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22849474 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 202280045221.3 Country of ref document: CN |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20247004389 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020247004389 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 202417010580 Country of ref document: IN |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 22849474 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |