[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2023070234A1 - Method for producing high-purity mg(oh)2 from industrial discard bischofite - Google Patents

Method for producing high-purity mg(oh)2 from industrial discard bischofite Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023070234A1
WO2023070234A1 PCT/CL2021/050131 CL2021050131W WO2023070234A1 WO 2023070234 A1 WO2023070234 A1 WO 2023070234A1 CL 2021050131 W CL2021050131 W CL 2021050131W WO 2023070234 A1 WO2023070234 A1 WO 2023070234A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bischofite
solution
purity
reactor
reagents
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/CL2021/050131
Other languages
Spanish (es)
French (fr)
Inventor
Adrián Mario QUISPE HUAYTA
Mario GRÁGEDA ZEGARRA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Universidad de Antofagasta
Original Assignee
Universidad de Antofagasta
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Universidad de Antofagasta filed Critical Universidad de Antofagasta
Publication of WO2023070234A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023070234A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F5/00Compounds of magnesium
    • C01F5/14Magnesium hydroxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F5/00Compounds of magnesium
    • C01F5/14Magnesium hydroxide
    • C01F5/22Magnesium hydroxide from magnesium compounds with alkali hydroxides or alkaline- earth oxides or hydroxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/04Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
    • C22B3/12Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching in inorganic alkaline solutions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/20Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
    • C22B3/22Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by physical processes, e.g. by filtration, by magnetic means, or by thermal decomposition
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/20Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
    • C22B3/44Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by chemical processes

Definitions

  • the present invention refers to the field of inorganic chemical industry, especially an effective method to obtain magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH) 2 ) with a purity of 99.7%, from waste bischofite (MgCI 2 x6H 2 O) purity of 88.0 %, and using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as reagent and sodium chloride (NaCI) as reaction medium.
  • Mg(OH) 2 magnesium hydroxide
  • waste bischofite (MgCI 2 x6H 2 O) purity of 88.0 % waste bischofite
  • NaOH sodium hydroxide
  • NaCI sodium chloride
  • Mg(OH) 2 in addition to the application in lithium-ion batteries, has a wide market with various uses, such as a flame retardant (fireproof filler) that does not develop toxic and corrosive substances on combustion.
  • Mg(OH) 2 also serves as a precursor for the synthesis of MgO refractory ceramics (C. Henrist, JP Mathieu, C. Vogels, A. Rulmont, and R. Cloots, "Morphological study of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles precipitated in dilute aqueous solution," Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 249, pp. 321-330, 2003/02/01 ).
  • magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH) 2 ) can be applied in different areas such as medicine, industry and battery manufacturing. For these applications, the material must be of high purity. However, with the traditional method only 95% purity is achieved.
  • the conventional process for the production of Mg(OH) 2 is based on the reaction of MgCI 2 with Ca(OH) 2 .
  • This process is economical due to the low prices of the CaO used in the reaction, however, the product contains many impurities that remain as reaction residue.
  • the Mg(OH) 2 obtained has a colloidal character since it is found in aqueous suspensions, due to its small crystal size, which makes it difficult to filter and very difficult to separate, retaining impurities in greater quantities.
  • the most predominant impurity is Ca(OH) 2 due to its low solubility (H. Tsuge, K. Okada, T. Yano, and N. Fukushi, "Reactive Crystalization of Magnesium Hydroxide," Department of Applied Chemistry 2014).
  • MgCI 2 solutions that use Ca(OH) 2 to precipitate Mg(OH) 2 directly from brines are used.
  • this process does not control the crystal size, which makes the filtering operation difficult, and the purity of the product in the form of Mg(OH) 2 ) only reaches 95%.
  • Different Mg compounds are also used, such as oxides, acetates or dolomites, which require different treatment, such as grinding, leaching and the use of lime or other bases, and may even recommend the use of magnesium salt sources such as bischofite but which They include other processes such as the previous purification treatment to eliminate a priori the impurities present in the waste bischofite.
  • CN101224901 B Liaoning Jiayi Hardware and Mineral CO LTD; Univ. Dalian Maritime
  • CN101224901 B Liaoning Jiayi Hardware and Mineral CO LTD; Univ. Dalian Maritime
  • treated bischofite is prepared in a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mol/L-4 mol/L, the bischofite solution and ammonium gas are added continuously after the reaction starts and produces the continuous deposition of magnesium hydroxide.
  • magnesium hydroxide with a granulometry of 10 microns-100 microns and a purity of 99-99.999% is obtained, that is, it has a large granule size and high purity.
  • CN101224902B Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Mimerals Co Ltd; Univ. Dalian Maritime
  • CN101224902B Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Mimerals Co Ltd; Univ. Dalian Maritime
  • the treated bischofite is prepared in a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mol/L-4 mol/L. Magnesium hydroxide with large granulometry of 10 pm-100 pm and high purity of 99-99.999% is produced.
  • CN1663913A (Univ. Beijing Science & Tech) refers to a method for preparing metallic magnesium from bischofite, and from which magnesium hydroxide is prepared by a process with ammonia at a temperature between 45-55°C for 20-30 minutes. , with a range of Mg:NH 3 of 1:1,2-1,5:2.2 and a magnesium chloride concentration of 5-55 g/L, calcining the magnesium hydroxide at a temperature between 900-1000°C for 3-4 hours, achieving magnesium hydroxide with a purity greater than 99.5%.
  • the present invention is distinguished by the direct use in the process of discarded bischofite with a determined composition and without prior treatment, exclusive use of NaOH as alkali and a NaCl solution as reaction medium and crystallization additive, and control of the feed flow of the reagents for the obtaining Mg(OH) 2 with a purity of 99.7%.
  • FIGS 1A and 1B Show the process and flowchart for obtaining Mg(OH) 2 from industrial waste bischofite.
  • FIG. 9A-9C BSE analysis of Mg(OH) 2 samples: Fig. 9A, Mg(control); Fig. 9B, Mg(comparative); and Fig. 9C, Mg(inventive).
  • FIGS 10A and 10B SEM image of Mg(control) by SE (secondary electrons).
  • FIGS 11 A and 11 B SEM image of Mg (comparative) by SE (secondary electrons).
  • FIGS 12A and 12B SEM image of Mg(inventive) by SE (secondary electrons).
  • the present invention relates to a method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide, Mg(OH) 2 from discarded bischofite from the industry, which ensures a product with a purity reaching 99.7%.
  • the method to obtain Mg(OH) 2 also uses the reagents NaOH as alkali and NaCl as an additive to improve crystallization.
  • the main product of the reaction is Mg(OH) 2 in the solid (s) state and NaCl in the aqueous (aq.) state, which can be removed by filtering and washing the crystals. It is also known that the preparation of a NaOH solution is an exothermic solution, and that its handling must be careful.
  • the thermodynamics of the reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 is shown in Figure 2, which shows that the chemical reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 is endothermic, therefore energy must be introduced into the system in the form of heat. for the reaction to proceed optimally.
  • the AG values show that the reaction is spontaneous and directly proportional to the temperature, thus a higher temperature favors the formation of Mg(OH) 2 .
  • Figures 1 A and 1 B show the process and flow diagram of the Mg(OH) 2 production process.
  • magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 The method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 according to the embodiment of the invention proposed in this application is described in detail below.
  • bischofite from the Salar de Atacama is used as a source of Magnesium, which responds to industrial discard bischofite with a purity of 88.04%.
  • purified bischofite of 94.54% purity is used; and for its part in the control method MgCI 2 *6H 2 O analytical grade of 99% purity, purchased from the company SIGMA ALDRICH, is used.
  • Table 1 presents the chemical composition of discarded bischofite of the invention and purified bischofite used in the comparative method.
  • Table 2 shows the symbols used to identify the Mg(OH) 2 products using: (1) industrial bischofite from the discard area, with a purity of 88.08%, (2) purified industrial bischofite, having a purity of 94.52%; and (3) MgCI 2 *6H 2 O, 99% pure analytical grade (Sigma Aldrich).
  • Step a) preparation of aqueous solutions of bischofite and sodium hydroxide.
  • the reagents are prepared, for which bischofite (current 100) is dissolved in water (current 1 10), forming a solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight of bischofite.
  • the alkali is prepared, which is selected exclusively from NaOH (current 200), and for which analytical grade NaOH is used, with a purity of 99% purchased from the company SIGMA ALDRICH.
  • the NaOH dissolves in water (stream 210) forming a 23 to 24% by weight NaOH solution.
  • Step b) conduction of reactive crystallization for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 .
  • reagents prepared in Step a) (current 120 and 220) maintaining a volume ratio of the NaCl/MgCl 2 solutions of 0.45, for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 by reactive crystallization, whose supersaturation level is mainly controlled by the change in pH.
  • This NaCI solution must be placed inside the Mg(OH) 2 formation reactor before starting the process, playing the role of reaction medium.
  • the presence of the NaCI solution inside the reactor allows the pH change not to be sudden when the reagents are fed, which favors the growth of the crystals.
  • the alkali and bischofite feed flows are established from 1.5 and 3.75 ml/min (0.1 1 and 0.27 reactor volume/h), up to 4.5 and 1 1.25 ml/min ( 0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h), respectively; and preferably these alkali and bischofite feed flows are 4.5 and 11.25 ml/min (0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h), respectively.
  • Alkali feeding must be carried out until the system reaches a pH of 12, which is the isoelectric point of Mg(OH) 2 .
  • a low reagent feed flow favors a pH change that is slow, obtaining larger crystals. With the feed flow of the reagents it is possible to control the size of the particles, therefore, if smaller crystals are desired, the feed flow of the reagents must be higher.
  • NaCl plays the role of reaction medium and additive for crystallization, because the small hydration sphere of Na + ion in solution is significantly absorbed in all facets of the crystal nuclei, which which allows a more orderly ionic diffusion of Mg, improving the growth and physical properties of the crystal.
  • the operational conditions inside the reactor are: temperature 80°C, mechanical stirring from 400 to 600 rpm, preferably 450 rpm; and a reaction time of 2.5 to 3 hours.
  • the reaction products are mainly Mg(OH) 2 and NaCl (stream 300).
  • the advantage of using NaOH as alkali is that the reaction by-products, such as Na, K, Li and Ca hydroxides or chlorides, are solubilized and these can be easily removed from the system by filtration since Mg(OH) 2 has a low solubility.
  • an aging time of 3 hours should be applied to the Mg(OH) 2 crystals after the reaction has concluded.
  • the aging of the crystals helps the smaller crystals to dissolve in the solution and precipitate again, being incorporated into the matrix of other larger crystals.
  • Step c) solid-liquid separation by filtering process.
  • the crystals obtained in the process have large dimensions, which makes the filtering operation easy.
  • Table 3 shows the results of the granulometric analysis performed on the products obtained from the bischophytes shown in Table 1 .
  • Step d) washing the Mg(OH) 2 pulp (current 400) with fresh water to eliminate the soluble impurities impregnated in the cake.
  • This stage is controlled by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate, since the higher the conductivity, the greater the presence of dissolved ions in it, and washing must be carried out until the conductivity of the filtrate is reduced to the lowest and constant value possible.
  • These minimum conductivity values range from 450 to 600 pS/cm.
  • Step e drying of the Mg(OH) 2 obtained from Step d).
  • the washed product from Step d) (stream 600) is dried in an oven at 80°C for two days.
  • the purity of this product is determined by XRD and chemical analysis, which is given in Figure 4.
  • the diffractograms show only the presence of Mg(OH) 2 , not being able to detect any other phase formed, which indicates a high purity of the product.
  • Table 4 shows the result of the chemical analyzes performed on both samples of Mg(OH) 2 .
  • a Mg(OH) 2 product with a higher purity reaching 99.7% is obtained.
  • a lower purity Mg(OH) 2 product is obtained, reaching 99.2%.
  • the bischofite cake of the invention has a lower percentage of retained water, which implies a lower amount of impurities impregnated in it, achieving a higher purity in the product.
  • a MgCl2 solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight is used, prepared from an 88% pure industrial waste bischofite and distilled water.
  • a 23 to 24% by weight NaOH solution prepared with 99% pure NaOH and distilled water is used as the basic solution.
  • a 12 to 13% by weight NaCl solution is prepared, in a volume ratio of NaCl/MgCl 2 equal to 0.45.
  • Both the NaOH solution and MgCl 2 must be fed at the same time into the reactor containing the NaCl solution.
  • the feeding speed of the MgCI 2 solution is based on the feeding speed of the NaOH solution, since the volume of both reagents is different due to their established concentration; therefore, for the process to work properly it is necessary that both reagents finish feeding at the same time, thus, the speed of both reagents will be different.
  • the flow was expressed in [ml/min], however, for scaling purposes it is convenient to express it in [V/h] of solution (where V represents the volume of the reactor).
  • V1, V2 and V3 three reagent feed flows are used (V1, V2 and V3) as detailed in the following Table 6.
  • the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained from the different feed streams were analyzed based on their separation properties and granulometric distribution.
  • the first aspect evaluated was the filtration time of each sample.
  • Table 8 shows the data obtained in each case, where it can be seen that the shortest filtration time was for the Mg(OH) 2 produced at the feeding speed V 2 , taking a time of 1.18 hours for its filtration. . Following this is the product produced at Vi and finally V 3 .
  • V 2 the product produced at Vi and finally V 3 .
  • FIG. 6 shows that the Mg(OH) 2 produced at V 2 requires 6 washing steps compared to Vi which required 10 and V 3 which required 7 steps to reach the lowest conductivity in the filtrate. This is due to the different sizes of crystals obtained in the different reagent feed flows, as shown in Figure 7. Large crystals allow reducing the colloidal effect formed by Mg(OH) 2 suspensions, thus way the sedimentation and filtration operations are facilitated.
  • the granulometric distribution of the product has a higher percentage of larger crystals compared to the other products.
  • the D 50 and D 90 of the product obtained with flows of feeding of the reagents represented through V 2 presents dimensions with values of 70.05 pm and 197.8 pm respectively, higher than the other cases.
  • the present invention relates to a method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 with a high purity of 99.7% from discarded bischofite without prior treatment, which comprises the following steps: a) preparation of the reagents consisting of: dissolving discarded bischofite in water, forming a solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight of bischofite; and in parallel prepare an alkaline solution of NaOH of 99% purity, in water forming a solution of 23 to 24% by weight of NaOH; where the discarded bischofite contains the following percentage composition: b) feeding the reagents prepared in a) to the reactor to conduct a reactive crystallization for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 , controlling the supersaturation by changing the pH, and using a NaCl solution with a concentration of 12 to 13% by weight , and a NaCI/MgCI 2 volume ratio of 0.45; and where the NaCI solution is inside the Mg(OH) 2 formation reactor before the reagents
  • stage c) before stage c), reduce the generation of aggregates, through prolonged aging times of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals once the reaction has concluded within the reactor, which favors the dissolution of crystals in the solution and their subsequent precipitation, incorporating other larger crystals into the matrix, and optionally g) after stage c), recirculating the reconditioned NaCl solution to the reactor, using it as additive and reaction medium instead of feeding a fresh NaCl solution after each Mg(OH) 2 formation process.
  • Mg(OH) 2 is obtained by crystallization by chemical reaction from discarded bischofite with the composition given in Table 1. The process and flowchart of figures 1 A and 1 B are used.
  • Mg(OH) 2 presents drawbacks since, being a product with colloidal characteristics, its filtration is a complex operation to carry out. This makes it difficult to wash properly, so many impurities remain impregnated. The colloidal effect is also manifested in the amount of energy and time spent on filtration.
  • NaCl is used as reaction medium and additive in crystallization, and low flows of reagent feed to the reactor to control crystal size. With these control parameters, larger crystals are obtained, filtering time is reduced and effective washing is performed, being a key step to obtain a highly pure product.
  • the operating conditions used in this example are noted below.
  • the NaOH used as reagent for the conversion of MgCI 2 to Mg(OH) 2 is of analytical grade, with a purity of 99% (Sigma Aldrich).
  • the NaCI used as additive has a purity of 99% (Sigma Aldrich).
  • the concentrations of the reagents used for the development of the Mg(OH) 2 production process are detailed in Table 1 1 .
  • a thermally insulated 2-liter glass reactor is used to avoid heat loss, the temperature was kept constant with a thermostatic bath (Lauda RE 107 thermostatic bath), stirring was permanent (IKA RW20 stirrer), the flows of feeding of each reagent were driven with peristaltic pumps (2, Watson-Marlow 520 peristaltic pumps).
  • the volume ratio of NaCl/MgCh is equal to 0.45.
  • the feed flow of the reagents is low, since care must be taken in the supersaturation stage for the Mg(OH) 2 production process. It is important to control the rate at which the precipitant is added, because if a medium with a degree of supersaturation is generated, the nucleation rate will be greater, causing the formation of a greater number of nuclei per unit of time, and therefore, obtaining smaller crystals with undefined geometric shapes. Small crystals also affect the quality of the precipitate, this is because they have a greater surface distribution than large crystals.
  • the most important step is washing, since this single operation allows the crystals to be freed from impregnated solutions that are laden with impurities.
  • it is a product with a very low solubility it is very convenient that the impurities are in the aqueous state, therefore, the use of NaOH as a reactant allowed obtaining the impurities in the aqueous state.
  • the main impurities in the system are Na + and K, which, when reacting with NaOH and MgCI 2 *6H 2 O, are obtained as possible by-products: NaOH, KOH, KCI and NaCI, this
  • NaOH, KOH, KCI and NaCI the main by-product of the reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 and the remainder of the additive solution, which are largely eliminated in the filtration of the product, which separates the cake formed from Mg(OH) 2 from the solution that contains impurities in aqueous state.
  • the remaining impurities impregnated in the crystals were removed by washing with distilled water at 80°C, with a 2:1 weight ratio of distilled water and Mg(OH) 2 cake, respectively, until a high purity product was obtained.
  • H3BO3 is in the solid state in the system.
  • Boric acid is slightly soluble in water, but its solubility increases with increasing temperature.
  • its solubility is strongly decreased by the presence of certain ions such as NaCI and LiCI (/W. O and DAN, "Analysis of the solubility of boric acid," Central Nuclear Atucha U22007). Since there is a high concentration of NaCI in the system, the solubility of H3BO3 is very low.
  • B(OH) 4 which is an ionic state of boric acid, is highly soluble in water. To determine the conditions under which this phase is stable in an aqueous system, a Pourbaix diagram was used ( Figure 8 (B)).
  • the product obtained in carrying out the invention reaches a higher purity with respect to the comparative example.
  • Using the most impure bischofite of 88.04% purity it is possible to obtain a Mg(OH) 2 product with a higher purity of 0.5%, compared to the product obtained with the bischofite of 94.54% purity. .
  • the presence of Na and Cl is attributed to the reaction by-product that was generated and the NaCI additive present during the reaction, however, the concentrations present in the product are very low, in the order of "ppm". as seen in Table 13.
  • the presence of B which is attributed as an impurity used, is the lowest compared to the other products.
  • the presence of impurities is negligible and they do not present a major problem in the filtration stages, being able to obtain a product of 99.9% purity.
  • the comparative Mg product that is obtained through the comparative method that uses purified bischofite of 94.54% purity, it is observed in this product that by washing it was possible to eliminate 99.54% of the Na + present as impurity in the bischofite. .
  • K + it was possible to eliminate 99.99% of this ion. Evaluating Cl, 95.2% is eliminated, and finally, with respect to boron, 73.68% is eliminated, finally achieving a purity of 99.23% as Mg(OH) 2 .
  • the Match program was used, which could show that the peaks correspond to the Mg(OH) 2 phase. As shown in Figure 4, in addition to Mg(OH) 2 , no other phase was identified, and impurities may exist, but in a very low proportion that this method cannot identify.
  • the quantitative particle size data shows that the D 10 for all three samples are approximate, with the largest being for Mg invention .
  • Evaluating the D 50 we can see a large variation in the particle sizes of the Mg invention and comparative Mg crystals with respect to control Mg, since the D 50 of comparative Mg (produced from 94.54% bischofite) is 46.4% larger in size than Mg control (produced from pure), and the Mg invention D 50 (produced from 84.04% bischofite) is 48.1% larger in size compared to the Mg control .
  • Analyzing the D 90 the size variation becomes larger.
  • the D 90 for comparative Mg presents a larger size by 53.44% compared to the D 90 for Mg control .
  • the D90 for Mg invention presents a larger size by 55.39% compared to the D 90 for Mg control .
  • the impurities of the bischophytes used acted in the same way as additives in the system, these ions foreign to the crystallized phase were absorbed on the crystalline surface, allowing an adequate diffusion of the Mg ions, as explained above.
  • Stocks of higher concentrations of impurities that act as additives allowed obtaining larger crystals.
  • the Mg control sample is the only one that presents crystals with homogeneous sizes.
  • the values of CU (uniformity coefficient) of M invention and comparative Mg are greater than 5, which indicates that these crystals do not have homogeneous sizes.
  • BSE analysis has the advantage of being sensitive to variations in the atomic number of the elements present on the surface of the sample. With this analysis we can qualitatively see the existence of some significant impurity, through some color variation on the surface of the sample. As can be seen in Figures 9A-9C, in all three cases a uniform shade of gray is observed on the surface of the samples. This indicates that the impurities are in very small proportions that cannot be detected by the equipment.
  • Figures 10A and 10B show the SEM analysis of the control Mg sample from SE secondary electrons, to better analyze the crystalline morphology.
  • Figure 9A shows the homogeneous distribution of these crystals of the control Mg product, and as can be seen, these crystals have a not very wide range of sizes, with good uniformity, since, as can be seen, the difference between the sizes is not very big.
  • Image 10B shows a very important aspect, the smaller crystals have a quasi-spherical shape, which could be beneficial for the washing process. Another important observation is that Mg C ontroi does not show a considerable presence of agglomerates.
  • Figures 1 1 A and 11 B the SEM analysis by SE for the comparative Mg sample is observed.
  • Figures 12A and 12B show the SEM analysis by SE for the Mg invention sample - Figure 12A shows the difference in crystal size, which, as in Figure 1 1 A corresponding to the comparative Mg sample It presents a non-uniformity in the distribution of sizes.
  • the presence of these in the inventive Mg and comparative Mg samples is attributed to the impurities of the bischophytes used, since both the hydration sphere of the K + and B(OH) ions ) 4 _ are different from those of the Na + ion, which adsorbing on the crystalline surface further favored agglomerate formation as well as increased crystalline growth.
  • the presence in greater quantities of Na + and Cl' ions from the impurities of the bischophytes helps the generation of agglomerates. Effect of crystal size and shape on filtration and purity.
  • the progress of the washing was monitored by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate.
  • the washing stages were carried out until the conductivity of the filtrate was reduced to the minimum possible value.
  • Mg(OH) 2 is a product with very low solubility, it was considered to control the conductivity of the filtrate as a purification parameter, since conductivity is closely related to the presence of ions in the solution; that is, the higher the conductivity of the filtrate, the presence of impurities impregnated in the crystalline mass.
  • the filtration time for each Mg(OH) 2 sample was also controlled to evaluate the effect of the granulometric distribution, the shape and the presence of agglomerates on the washing performance.
  • the conductivity of the filtrate of the inventive Mg sample is the highest, with a value of 228 [mS/cm], this is due to the greater presence of ions as impurities in the industrial waste bischofite. used.
  • the comparative Mg sample filtrate has an initial conductivity of 217.7 [mS/cm], 4.5% less than the Mg filtrate of the invention ; this is due to the purity of the purified bischofite that was used to synthesize this product.
  • the initial conductivity of the filtrate of the Mg control sample is the lowest value among the three, with 209.4 [mS/cm], 8.5% lower than the filtrate of the Mg invention sample; in this case the conductivity for the control Mg filtrate is only due to the presence of Na + and Cl- ions in solution.
  • the conductivity is reduced linearly for the samples Mg invention , Mg comparative and Mg control , with reduction percentages of 80 , 84.2 and 84.6% respectively. From this point the rate of conductivity reduction varies taking another trend.
  • the final conductivity of the control Mg filtrate was on average 61 % lower than the final conductivities of inventive Mg and comparative Mg -
  • This variation can be explained due to the effect of the presence of agglomerates in the Mg invention and comparative Mg samples that, despite Having larger crystals, the presence of agglomerates made the crystalline mass retain a greater amount of solution, this explains the variation in purity obtained in each sample.
  • the effect of the agglomerates is also notable in the values of the Mg invention and comparative Mg curves, since each one has values higher than those of the control Mg curve.
  • the time it took to filter for each sample and the percentage of water retained are presented in Table 15.
  • the filtration time was faster for M invention than for Mgcomparative. This variation in filtration times is largely due to the presence of agglomerates. As can be seen in Figure 1 1 B, the comparative Mg sample presents a greater amount of agglomerates, which obviously affects the filtering time.
  • the Mg control sample contains the smallest crystals, its uniform granulometric distribution, the absence of agglomerates and the almost spherical shape of the smallest particles allowed the filtration to be carried out in 1.6 hours and also retaining the least amount. of water in the cake, obtaining a 99.88% pure Mg(OH) 2 product.
  • Table 15 also shows the values for the percentage of water retained for each sample, this value was obtained by weighing the wet Mg(OH) 2 pulp after filtering and the weight of the completely dry Mg(OH) 2 . Although the sample M invention presents less water retention than the comparative Mg sample, the values of the retention percentage in both samples are very close.
  • the Mg invention sample performed better and achieved a higher product purity with respect to comparative Mg.
  • This Advantageous variation in the invention Mg sample is mainly due to the higher amount of agglomerates present in the comparative Mg sample.
  • a factor that also contributes to achieving a higher purity in inventive Mg is the larger crystal size that is achieved in this sample. Since, as shown in Table 9, the Mg invention crystals are 4.2% larger than those of comparative Mg, this small difference significantly influenced the behavior of the Mg invention pulp, due to the presence of larger particles. , there being less additive force of the solutions on the crystal matrix, causing the percentage of retained H 2 O to be lower. Due to all these factors, the Mg(OH) 2 product of the invention Mg sample is of higher purity than comparative Mg.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Alkaline-Earth Elements, Aluminum Or Rare-Earth Metals (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for producing 99.7% high-purity magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) from discard bischofite, said method comprising: a) preparing reagents, dissolving 88% pure discard bischofite in water, and forming a 36-37% bischofite solution by weight; and at the same time preparing a high-purity NaOH alkaline solution in water, forming a 23-24% NaOH solution by weight: b) conducting a reactive crystallisation to form Mg(OH)2, controlling supersaturation by change of pH, and using a 12-13% NaCl solution by weight, the NaCl/MgCl2 (v/v) proportion being 0.45, introducing the NaCl solution to the reactor before the reagents prepared in a); c) separating from the solution obtained in b), using filtration, preferably in a filter press; d) washing the Mg(OH)2 pulp with fresh water to remove impurities; and e) drying at 80°C.

Description

MÉTODO DE PRODUCCIÓN DE MG(OH)2 DE ALTA PUREZA A PARTIR DE BISCHOFITA DE DESCARTE INDUSTRIAL. PRODUCTION METHOD OF HIGH PURITY MG(OH)2 FROM INDUSTRIAL DISCARD BISCHOFITE.

CAMPO DE LA INVENCION FIELD OF THE INVENTION

La presente invención se refiere al campo de la industria química inorgánica, especialmente un método efectivo para obtener hidróxido de magnesio (Mg(OH)2) de pureza del 99,7 %, a partir de bischofita (MgCI2x6H2O) de descarte de pureza del 88.0 %, y usando como reactivo hidróxido de sodio (NaOH) y cloruro de sodio (NaCI) como medio de reacción. The present invention refers to the field of inorganic chemical industry, especially an effective method to obtain magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH) 2 ) with a purity of 99.7%, from waste bischofite (MgCI 2 x6H 2 O) purity of 88.0 %, and using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as reagent and sodium chloride (NaCI) as reaction medium.

ANTECEDENTES BACKGROUND

El Mg(OH)2, además de la aplicación en baterías de ion-litio, tiene un amplio mercado con diversos usos, tales como retardante de flama (relleno ignífugo) que no desarrolla sustancias tóxicas y corrosivas en la combustión. También el Mg(OH)2 sirve como precursor para la síntesis de cerámica refractaria de MgO (C. Henrist, J. P. Mathieu, C. Vogels, A. Rulmont, and R. Cloots, "Morphological study of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles precipitated in dilute aqueous solution," Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 249, pp. 321 -330, 2003/02/01 ). Asimismo, el hidróxido de magnesio (Mg(OH)2) puede ser aplicado en distintas áreas como medicina, industria y fabricación de baterías. Para estas aplicaciones, el material debe ser de alta pureza. Sin embargo, con el método tradicional solo se alcanza una pureza del 95%. Mg(OH) 2 , in addition to the application in lithium-ion batteries, has a wide market with various uses, such as a flame retardant (fireproof filler) that does not develop toxic and corrosive substances on combustion. Mg(OH) 2 also serves as a precursor for the synthesis of MgO refractory ceramics (C. Henrist, JP Mathieu, C. Vogels, A. Rulmont, and R. Cloots, "Morphological study of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles precipitated in dilute aqueous solution," Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 249, pp. 321-330, 2003/02/01 ). Likewise, magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH) 2 ) can be applied in different areas such as medicine, industry and battery manufacturing. For these applications, the material must be of high purity. However, with the traditional method only 95% purity is achieved.

El proceso convencional para la producción de Mg(OH)2 se basa en la reacción de MgCI2 con Ca(OH)2. Este proceso resulta económico debido a los bajos precios del CaO que se utiliza en la reacción, sin embargo, el producto contiene muchas impurezas que quedan como residuo de la reacción. El Mg(OH)2 obtenido tiene un carácter coloidal ya que se encuentra en suspensiones acuosas, debido al pequeño tamaño de cristal que presenta, por lo cual es dificultoso filtrarlo y muy difícil de separar, reteniendo impurezas en mayor cantidad. La impureza más predominante es el Ca(OH)2 debido a su baja solubilidad (H. Tsuge, K. Okada, T. Yano, and N. Fukushi, "Reactive Crystalization of Magnesium Hydroxide," Department of Applied Chemistry 2014).The conventional process for the production of Mg(OH) 2 is based on the reaction of MgCI 2 with Ca(OH) 2 . This process is economical due to the low prices of the CaO used in the reaction, however, the product contains many impurities that remain as reaction residue. The Mg(OH) 2 obtained has a colloidal character since it is found in aqueous suspensions, due to its small crystal size, which makes it difficult to filter and very difficult to separate, retaining impurities in greater quantities. The most predominant impurity is Ca(OH) 2 due to its low solubility (H. Tsuge, K. Okada, T. Yano, and N. Fukushi, "Reactive Crystalization of Magnesium Hydroxide," Department of Applied Chemistry 2014).

Muchas investigaciones se han realizado para producir Mg(OH)2 de alta pureza, estudiando el efecto que tiene el tipo de álcali en la reacción. En estos trabajos se ha estudiado la incidencia de la solubilidad y la concentración de álcali en la cristalización reactiva, y se ha obtenido que el NaOH es un álcali adecuado para el proceso, produciendo cristales grandes y subproductos insolubles en la reacción, que facilitan las operaciones de filtrado. La agitación, la temperatura y el flujo de alimentación de los reactivos son parámetros operacionales que también tienen un efecto significativo en el tamaño de cristal. Además, el uso de aditivos favorece al crecimiento del cristal, limitando la tasa de nucleación (H. Tsuge, K. Okada, T. Yano, and N. Fukushi, "Reactive Crystalization of Magnesium Hydroxide," Department of Applied Chemistry 2014; A. Cipollina, M. Bevacqua, P. Dolcimascolo, A. Tamburini, A. Brucato, H. Glade, et al., "Reactive crystallisation process for magnesium recovery from concentrated brines," Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 55, pp. 2377-2388, 2015/08/28; yX. Song, S. Sun, D. Zhang, J. Wang, and J. Yu, "Synthesis and characterization of magnesium hydroxide by batch reaction crystallization," Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 416-421, December 01 2011). Much research has been done to produce high purity Mg(OH) 2 , studying the effect of the type of alkali on the reaction. In these works, the incidence of solubility and alkali concentration in reactive crystallization has been studied, and it has been obtained that NaOH is a suitable alkali for the process, producing large crystals and insoluble by-products in the reaction, which facilitate operations. filtering. Stirring, temperature, and reagent feed flow are operational parameters that also have a significant effect on crystal size. In addition, the use of additives favors crystal growth, limiting the nucleation rate (H. Tsuge, K. Okada, T. Yano, and N. Fukushi, "Reactive Crystalization of Magnesium Hydroxide," Department of Applied Chemistry 2014; A Cipollina, M. Bevacqua, P. Dolcimascolo, A. Tamburini, A. Brucato, H. Glade, et al., "Reactive crystallization process for magnesium recovery from concentrated brines," Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 55, pp. 2377-2388, 2015/08/28, and X. Song, S. Sun, D. Zhang, J. Wang, and J. Yu, "Synthesis and characterization of magnesium hydroxide by batch reaction crystallization," Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, vol. 5, p. 416-421, December 01 2011).

Por otra parte, el tratamiento de las salmueras para la concentración de litio en la industria de la minería no metálica se hace mediante pozas de evaporación. En las diferentes etapas de concentración, precipitan distintas sales, donde algunas son utilizadas en el mismo proceso, comercializadas o desechadas. Dentro de las principales sales de desecho, se encuentra el Cloruro de Magnesio Hexahidratado (MgCI2x6H2O), conocido como Bischofita. Una fracción de dicha sal es utilizada como supresor de polvo para caminos de tierra; sin embargo, una gran cantidad de esta sal es almacenada como material de desecho. On the other hand, the treatment of brines for the concentration of lithium in the non-metallic mining industry is done through evaporation pools. In the different stages of concentration, different salts precipitate, where some are used in the same process, marketed or discarded. Within the main waste salts, is Magnesium Chloride Hexahydrate (MgCI 2 x6H 2 O), known as Bischofite. A fraction of said salt is used as a dust suppressant for dirt roads; however, a large amount of this salt is stored as waste material.

Hay algunos intentos por producir Mg(OH)2 a partir de bischofita pero se emplean soluciones de MgCI2 que usan Ca(OH)2 para precipitar Mg(OH)2 directamente desde las salmueras. Sin embargo, como se explicó anteriormente, este proceso no controla el tamaño de cristal lo que dificulta la operación de filtrado, y la pureza del producto en la forma de Mg(OH)2) solo alcanza el 95%. También se usan diferentes compuestos de Mg, tales como óxidos, acetatos o dolomitas, que exigen un tratamiento diferente, como molienda, lixiviación y uso de cal u otras bases, e inclusive pueden recomendar el uso de fuentes de sales de magnesio como bischofita pero que incluyen otros procesos como el tratamiento previo de purificación para eliminar a priori las impurezas presentes en la bischofita de desecho. There are some attempts to produce Mg(OH) 2 from bischofite but MgCI 2 solutions that use Ca(OH) 2 to precipitate Mg(OH) 2 directly from brines are used. However, as explained above, this process does not control the crystal size, which makes the filtering operation difficult, and the purity of the product in the form of Mg(OH) 2 ) only reaches 95%. Different Mg compounds are also used, such as oxides, acetates or dolomites, which require different treatment, such as grinding, leaching and the use of lime or other bases, and may even recommend the use of magnesium salt sources such as bischofite but which They include other processes such as the previous purification treatment to eliminate a priori the impurities present in the waste bischofite.

CN101224901 B (Liaoning Jiayi Hardware and Mineral CO LTD; Univ. Dalian Maritime) se refiere a un método para preparar continuamente hidróxido de magnesio de alta pureza desde bischofita como materia prima y amonio como precipitante, donde bischofita tratada es preparada en una solución con una concentración de 0,5 mol/L-4 mol/L, la solución de bischofita y gas amonio se agregan continuamente después que la reacción comienza y produce la continua deposición de hidróxido de magnesio. A partir de este método se obtiene hidróxido de magnesio con granulometría de 10 micrones-100 micrones y una pureza de 99-99,999%, es decir, tiene tamaño de gránulo grande y alta pureza. CN101224901 B (Liaoning Jiayi Hardware and Mineral CO LTD; Univ. Dalian Maritime) refers to a method for continuously preparing high purity magnesium hydroxide from bischofite as a raw material and ammonium as a precipitant, whereby treated bischofite is prepared in a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mol/L-4 mol/L, the bischofite solution and ammonium gas are added continuously after the reaction starts and produces the continuous deposition of magnesium hydroxide. From this method, magnesium hydroxide with a granulometry of 10 microns-100 microns and a purity of 99-99.999% is obtained, that is, it has a large granule size and high purity.

CN101224902B (Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Mimerals Co Ltd; Univ. Dalian Maritime) se refiere a un método para depositar hidróxido de magnesio de alta pureza, con una doble fase líquida de amoníaco para producir de forma continua hidróxido de magnesio desde bischofita y amoníaco - agua amoniacal como precipitante. La bischofita tratada es preparada en una solución con una concentración de 0,5 mol/L-4 mol/L. Se produce hidróxido de magnesio con granulometría grande de 10 pm-100 pmy alta pureza de 99-99,999%. CN101224902B (Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Mimerals Co Ltd; Univ. Dalian Maritime) refers to a method for depositing high-purity magnesium hydroxide, with an ammonia liquid double phase to continuously produce magnesium hydroxide from bischofite and ammonia - water ammoniacal as a precipitant. The treated bischofite is prepared in a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mol/L-4 mol/L. Magnesium hydroxide with large granulometry of 10 pm-100 pm and high purity of 99-99.999% is produced.

CN1663913A (Univ. Beijing Science & Tech) se refiere a un método para preparar magnesio metálico desde bischofita, y a partir de la cual se prepara hidróxido de magnesio mediante un proceso con amoníaco a una temperatura entre 45-55°C durante 20-30 minutos, con un intervalo de Mg:NH3 de 1 :1 ,2-1 ,5:2.2 y concentración de cloruro de magnesio de 5-55 g/L, calcinando el hidróxido de magnesio a una temperatura entre 900-1000°C por 3-4 horas, logrando hidróxido de magnesio con una pureza mayor a 99,5%. Si bien se han desarrollado muchos métodos para la obtención de Mg(OH)2, aún existe la necesidad de un método efectivo para obtener Mg(OH)2 de alta pureza utilizando bischofita de desecho como fuente de Magnesio. La presente invención se distingue por el

Figure imgf000004_0001
uso directo en el proceso de bischofita de descarte con una composición determinada y sin tratamiento previo, uso exclusivo de NaOH como álcali y una solución de NaCI como medio de reacción y aditivo de cristalización, y el control del flujo de alimentación de los reactivos para la obtención de Mg(OH)2 con una pureza del 99,7%. CN1663913A (Univ. Beijing Science & Tech) refers to a method for preparing metallic magnesium from bischofite, and from which magnesium hydroxide is prepared by a process with ammonia at a temperature between 45-55°C for 20-30 minutes. , with a range of Mg:NH 3 of 1:1,2-1,5:2.2 and a magnesium chloride concentration of 5-55 g/L, calcining the magnesium hydroxide at a temperature between 900-1000°C for 3-4 hours, achieving magnesium hydroxide with a purity greater than 99.5%. Although many methods for obtaining Mg(OH) 2 have been developed, there is still a need for an effective method to obtain high purity Mg(OH) 2 using waste bischofite as a Magnesium source. The present invention is distinguished by the
Figure imgf000004_0001
direct use in the process of discarded bischofite with a determined composition and without prior treatment, exclusive use of NaOH as alkali and a NaCl solution as reaction medium and crystallization additive, and control of the feed flow of the reagents for the obtaining Mg(OH) 2 with a purity of 99.7%.

BREVE DESCRIPCION DE LAS FIGURAS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Figuras 1A y 1 B. Muestran proceso y diagrama de flujo para la obtención de Mg(OH)2 a partir de bischofita de descarte industrial. Figures 1A and 1B. Show the process and flowchart for obtaining Mg(OH) 2 from industrial waste bischofite.

Figura 2. Datos termodinámicos de la reacción de formación de Mg(OH)2 a partir de MgCI2*6H2O. Figura 3. Análisis granulométrico de los productos de Mg(OH)2. Figure 2. Thermodynamic data of the reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 from MgCI 2 *6H 2 O. Figure 3. Granulometric analysis of the Mg(OH) 2 products.

Figura 4. Análisis DRX de las muestras de Mg(OH)2. Figure 4. XRD analysis of the Mg(OH) 2 samples.

Figura 5. Distribución granulométrica de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 (% Retenido) para diferentes fuentes de

Figure imgf000004_0002
Figure 5. Granulometric distribution of Mg(OH) 2 crystals (% Retained) for different sources of
Figure imgf000004_0002

Figura 6. Etapas de lavado para la purificación del Mg(OH)2 obtenido a diferentes flujos de alimentación. Figure 6. Washing stages for the purification of the Mg(OH) 2 obtained at different feed flows.

Figura 7. Distribución granulométrica de los productos de Mg(OH)2 obtenidos a diferentes flujos de alimentación de reactivos (porcentaje retenido). Figure 7. Granulometric distribution of the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained at different reagent feed flows (retained percentage).

Figura 8. Diagramas de E-pH: (A) Sistema Mg-CI-H2O y (B) Sistema B-H2O Figure 8. E-pH diagrams: (A) Mg-CI-H 2 O system and (B) B-H2O system

Figura 9A-9C. Análisis BSE de muestras de Mg(OH)2: Fig. 9A, Mg(control); Fig. 9B, Mg(comparativo); y Fig. 9C, Mg(inventivo). Figure 9A-9C. BSE analysis of Mg(OH) 2 samples: Fig. 9A, Mg(control); Fig. 9B, Mg(comparative); and Fig. 9C, Mg(inventive).

Figuras 10A y 10B. Imagen SEM de Mg(control) por SE (electrones secundarios). Figures 10A and 10B. SEM image of Mg(control) by SE (secondary electrons).

Figuras 11 A y 11 B. Imagen SEM de Mg(comparativo) por SE (electrones secundarios). Figures 11 A and 11 B. SEM image of Mg (comparative) by SE (secondary electrons).

Figuras 12A y 12B. Imagen SEM de Mg(inventivo) por SE (electrones secundarios). Figures 12A and 12B. SEM image of Mg(inventive) by SE (secondary electrons).

Figura 13. Evolución de etapas de lavado de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 producidos en función a la conductividad. Figure 13. Evolution of washing stages of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals produced as a function of conductivity.

DESCRIPCION DETALLADA DE LA INVENCION DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

La presente invención se relaciona con un método para obtener hidróxido de magnesio, Mg(OH)2 a partir de bischofita de descarte de la industria, que asegura un producto con una

Figure imgf000004_0004
pureza que alcanza el 99,7%. El método para obtener Mg(OH)2 emplea además los reactivos NaOH como álcali y NaCI como un aditivo para mejorar la cristalización. The present invention relates to a method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide, Mg(OH) 2 from discarded bischofite from the industry, which ensures a product with a
Figure imgf000004_0004
purity reaching 99.7%. The method to obtain Mg(OH) 2 also uses the reagents NaOH as alkali and NaCl as an additive to improve crystallization.

Es sabido que la reacción de MgCI2 y NaOH requiere que los reactivos se encuentren en estado iónico y corresponde a una reacción química homogénea, ver la ecuación química (Ec. 1 ).

Figure imgf000004_0003
It is known that the reaction of MgCI 2 and NaOH requires that the reagents be in the ionic state and corresponds to a homogeneous chemical reaction, see the chemical equation (Eq. 1).
Figure imgf000004_0003

El producto principal de la reacción es Mg(OH)2 en estado sólido (s) y NaCI en estado acuoso (ac.), el cual puede ser eliminado mediante filtrado y lavado de los cristales. También se sabe que la preparación de una solución de NaOH es una disolución exotérmica, y que su manejo debe ser cuidadoso. La termodinámica de la reacción de formación de Mg(OH)2 se muestra en la Figura 2, que muestra que la reacción química de formación de Mg(OH)2 es endotérmica, por lo cual se debe introducir energía al sistema en forma de calor para que la reacción se desarrolle de manera óptima. Los valores de AG muestran que la reacción es espontánea y directamente proporcional a la temperatura, de este modo una temperatura mayor favorece la formación de Mg(OH)2. De la misma manera, el equilibrio de la reacción se favorece a temperaturas altas, como muestra la Figura 2, y se incrementa con el aumento de temperatura, desplazando el equilibrio hacia la formación de Mg(OH)2, pudiéndose así alcanzar altas conversiones. En consecuencia, en el proceso estudiado, se utiliza una temperatura de operación de 80°C, para evitar una alta tasa de evaporación y la sobresaturación de la solución con NaCI. The main product of the reaction is Mg(OH) 2 in the solid (s) state and NaCl in the aqueous (aq.) state, which can be removed by filtering and washing the crystals. It is also known that the preparation of a NaOH solution is an exothermic solution, and that its handling must be careful. The thermodynamics of the reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 is shown in Figure 2, which shows that the chemical reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 is endothermic, therefore energy must be introduced into the system in the form of heat. for the reaction to proceed optimally. The AG values show that the reaction is spontaneous and directly proportional to the temperature, thus a higher temperature favors the formation of Mg(OH) 2 . In the same way, the equilibrium of the reaction is favored at high temperatures, as shown in Figure 2, and it increases with the increase in temperature, displacing the equilibrium towards the formation of Mg(OH) 2 , thus being able to reach high conversions. Consequently, in the studied process, an operating temperature of 80°C is used, to avoid a high evaporation rate and supersaturation of the solution with NaCI.

Las Figuras 1 A y 1 B muestran el proceso y diagrama de flujo del proceso de producción de Mg(OH)2. Figures 1 A and 1 B show the process and flow diagram of the Mg(OH) 2 production process.

A continuación se describe de manera detallada el método para obtener hidróxido de magnesio Mg(OH)2 de acuerdo a la realización de la invención que se propone en esta solicitud. En este método de la invención se utiliza como fuente de Magnesio bischofita proveniente del Salar de Atacama que responde a bischofita de descarte industrial con una pureza de 88,04 %. En el método comparativo de obtención de Mg(OH)2 se emplea bischofita purificada de pureza 94,54 %; y por su parte en el método control se emplea MgCI2*6H2O grado analítico de 99% de pureza, adquirido de la empresa SIGMA ALDRICH. The method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 according to the embodiment of the invention proposed in this application is described in detail below. In this method of the invention, bischofite from the Salar de Atacama is used as a source of Magnesium, which responds to industrial discard bischofite with a purity of 88.04%. In the comparative method for obtaining Mg(OH) 2 , purified bischofite of 94.54% purity is used; and for its part in the control method MgCI 2 *6H 2 O analytical grade of 99% purity, purchased from the company SIGMA ALDRICH, is used.

En el método comparativo y el método control se utiliza el mismo procedimiento que el utilizado en el método de la invención solo se modifica el MgCI2*6H2O de partida como fue indicado en el párrafo anterior. In the comparative method and the control method, the same procedure is used as that used in the method of the invention, only the starting MgCI 2 *6H 2 O is modified as indicated in the previous paragraph.

En la Tabla 1 se presenta la composición química de bischofita de descarte de la invención y bischofita purificada utilizada en el método comparativo. Table 1 presents the chemical composition of discarded bischofite of the invention and purified bischofite used in the comparative method.

Tabla 1. Composición química de bischofita de descarte de la invención y bischofita purificada utilizada en el método comparativo.

Figure imgf000005_0001
Table 1. Chemical composition of discarded bischofite of the invention and purified bischofite used in the comparative method.
Figure imgf000005_0001

En la Tabla 2 se presenta la simbología usada para identificar los productos de Mg(OH)2 utilizando: (1 ) bischofita industrial de zona de descartes, teniendo una pureza de 88,08%, (2) bischofita industrial purificada, teniendo una pureza de 94,52%; y (3) MgCI2*6H2O, grado analítico de 99% de pureza (Sigma Aldrich). Table 2 shows the symbols used to identify the Mg(OH) 2 products using: (1) industrial bischofite from the discard area, with a purity of 88.08%, (2) purified industrial bischofite, having a purity of 94.52%; and (3) MgCI 2 *6H 2 O, 99% pure analytical grade (Sigma Aldrich).

Tabla 2. Simbología usada para identificar el producto de Mg(OH)2.

Figure imgf000006_0002
Table 2. Symbology used to identify the Mg(OH) 2 product.
Figure imgf000006_0002

Paso a), preparación de soluciones acuosas de bischofita e hidróxido de sodio. Step a), preparation of aqueous solutions of bischofite and sodium hydroxide.

Se preparan los reactivos, para lo cual bischofita (corriente 100) es disuelta en

Figure imgf000006_0001
agua (corriente 1 10), formando una disolución con una concentración de 36 a 37% en peso de bischofita. The reagents are prepared, for which bischofite (current 100) is dissolved in
Figure imgf000006_0001
water (current 1 10), forming a solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight of bischofite.

De manera paralela, se prepara el álcali, que se selecciona exclusivamente de NaOH (corriente 200), y para lo cual se utiliza NaOH de grado analítico, con una pureza de 99% adquirido de la empresa SIGMA ALDRICH. El NaOH se disuelve en agua (corriente 210) formando una disolución de 23 a 24% en peso de NaOH. In parallel, the alkali is prepared, which is selected exclusively from NaOH (current 200), and for which analytical grade NaOH is used, with a purity of 99% purchased from the company SIGMA ALDRICH. The NaOH dissolves in water (stream 210) forming a 23 to 24% by weight NaOH solution.

Paso b), conducción de la cristalización reactiva para la formación de Mg(OH)2. Step b), conduction of reactive crystallization for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 .

Se incorpora dentro del reactor una solución de NaCI con una concentración de 12 a 13 %, preparada a partir de NaCI de grado analítico con una pureza de 99% adquirido de la empresa SIGMA ALDRICH, y se alimentan al reactor de manera paralela y paulatina los reactivos preparados en el Paso a) (corriente 120 y 220) manteniendo una relación en volumen de las soluciones de NaCI/MgCI2 de 0,45, para la formación de Mg(OH)2 mediante una cristalización reactiva, cuyo nivel de sobresaturación es controlado principalmente por el cambio de pH. A NaCI solution with a concentration of 12 to 13%, prepared from analytical grade NaCI with a purity of 99% purchased from the company SIGMA ALDRICH, is incorporated into the reactor, and the reactor is fed in parallel and gradually. reagents prepared in Step a) (current 120 and 220) maintaining a volume ratio of the NaCl/MgCl 2 solutions of 0.45, for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 by reactive crystallization, whose supersaturation level is mainly controlled by the change in pH.

Esta solución de NaCI, se debe situar dentro del reactor de formación de Mg(OH)2 antes de iniciado el proceso, desempeñando el papel de medio de reacción. La presencia de la solución de NaCI dentro el reactor, permite que el cambio de pH no sea brusco cuando se alimentan los reactivos, lo cual favorece el crecimiento de los cristales. This NaCI solution must be placed inside the Mg(OH) 2 formation reactor before starting the process, playing the role of reaction medium. The presence of the NaCI solution inside the reactor allows the pH change not to be sudden when the reagents are fed, which favors the growth of the crystals.

Los flujos de alimentación del álcali y bischofita se establecen desde 1 ,5 y 3,75 ml/min (0,1 1 y 0,27 volumen de reactor/h), hasta 4,5 y 1 1 ,25 ml/min (0,33 y 0,82 volumen de reactor/h), respectivamente; y de manera preferida estos flujos de alimentación del álcali y bischofita son 4,5 y 11 ,25 ml/min (0,33 y 0,82 volumen de reactor/h), respectivamente. La alimentación del álcali debe realizarse hasta que el sistema alcance un pH de 12, que es el punto isoeléctrico del Mg(OH)2. Un flujo bajo de alimentación de los reactivos favorece a que el cambio de pH sea lento, obteniendo cristales más grandes. Con el flujo de alimentación de los reactivos es posible controlar el tamaño de las partículas, por lo cual, si se desean cristales más pequeños el flujo de alimentación de los reactivos debe ser mayor. The alkali and bischofite feed flows are established from 1.5 and 3.75 ml/min (0.1 1 and 0.27 reactor volume/h), up to 4.5 and 1 1.25 ml/min ( 0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h), respectively; and preferably these alkali and bischofite feed flows are 4.5 and 11.25 ml/min (0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h), respectively. Alkali feeding must be carried out until the system reaches a pH of 12, which is the isoelectric point of Mg(OH) 2 . A low reagent feed flow favors a pH change that is slow, obtaining larger crystals. With the feed flow of the reagents it is possible to control the size of the particles, therefore, if smaller crystals are desired, the feed flow of the reagents must be higher.

Mientras la reacción ocurre, el NaCI desempeña el papel de medio de reacción y aditivo para la cristalización, debido a que la pequeña esfera de hidratación del ion Na+ en solución se absorbe de forma significativa en todas las facetas de los núcleos del cristal, lo cual permite una difusión iónica de Mg más ordenada, mejorando el crecimiento y las propiedades físicas del cristal.While the reaction occurs, NaCl plays the role of reaction medium and additive for crystallization, because the small hydration sphere of Na + ion in solution is significantly absorbed in all facets of the crystal nuclei, which which allows a more orderly ionic diffusion of Mg, improving the growth and physical properties of the crystal.

Las condiciones operacionales dentro el reactor son: temperatura 80°C, agitación mecánica de 400 a 600 rpm, preferiblemente 450 rpm; y un tiempo de reacción de 2,5 a 3 horas. The operational conditions inside the reactor are: temperature 80°C, mechanical stirring from 400 to 600 rpm, preferably 450 rpm; and a reaction time of 2.5 to 3 hours.

Los productos de reacción son Mg(OH)2 y NaCI principalmente (corriente 300). La ventaja de usar NaOH como álcali, es que los subproductos de reacción, tales como hidróxidos o cloruros de Na, K, Li y Ca se encuentran solubilizados y estos pueden ser fácilmente eliminados del sistema mediante filtración ya que el Mg(OH)2 posee una baja solubilidad. The reaction products are mainly Mg(OH) 2 and NaCl (stream 300). The advantage of using NaOH as alkali is that the reaction by-products, such as Na, K, Li and Ca hydroxides or chlorides, are solubilized and these can be easily removed from the system by filtration since Mg(OH) 2 has a low solubility.

Para reducir la generación de agregados, debe emplearse un tiempo de 3 horas de envejecimiento a los cristales de Mg(OH)2 luego de que la reacción haya concluido. El envejecimiento de los cristales ayuda a que los cristales más pequeños se disuelvan en la solución y vuelvan a precipitar incorporándose en la matriz de otros cristales de mayores dimensiones. To reduce the generation of aggregates, an aging time of 3 hours should be applied to the Mg(OH) 2 crystals after the reaction has concluded. The aging of the crystals helps the smaller crystals to dissolve in the solution and precipitate again, being incorporated into the matrix of other larger crystals.

Paso c), separación sólido líquido mediante proceso de filtrado. Step c), solid-liquid separation by filtering process.

Los cristales obtenidos en el proceso presentan dimensiones grandes, lo cual hace que la operación de filtrado sea realizada con facilidad. The crystals obtained in the process have large dimensions, which makes the filtering operation easy.

En la Tabla 3 se muestran los resultados de análisis granulométñco realizado a los productos obtenidos a partir de las bischofitas mostradas en la Tabla 1 . Table 3 shows the results of the granulometric analysis performed on the products obtained from the bischophytes shown in Table 1 .

Tabla 3. Dimensiones de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 producidos.

Figure imgf000007_0001
Table 3. Dimensions of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals produced.
Figure imgf000007_0001

La distribución granulométñca de los productos se muestra en la Figura 5. The granulometric distribution of the products is shown in Figure 5.

Como se puede observar de la Tabla 3 y Figura 3 y 5, se destaca que con la bischofita que se utiliza en el método de la invención es posible obtener cristales de mayores dimensiones. Esto es atribuido a la mayor presencia de impurezas en la materia prima que favorece el crecimiento cristalino. De esta manera, el producto es adecuadamente separado mediante filtración, preferentemente mediante filtro prensa. Posteriormente, el filtrado (corriente 410), que consiste principalmente de una solución de NaCI, puede ser recirculado al reactor luego de un reacondicionamiento, para trabajar como aditivo y medio de reacción en lugar de alimentar una solución fresca de NaCI luego de cada proceso de formación de Mg(OH)2. La corriente 400, que consiste en la pulpa de Mg(OH)2 pasa a la etapa de lavado. As can be seen from Table 3 and Figures 3 and 5, it is noted that with the bischofite used in the method of the invention it is possible to obtain larger crystals. This is attributed to the greater presence of impurities in the raw material that favors crystalline growth. In this way, the product is adequately separated by filtration, preferably by filter press. Subsequently, the filtrate (stream 410), which consists mainly of a NaCl solution, can be recycled to the reactor after a workover, to work as an additive and reaction medium instead of feeding a fresh NaCl solution after each Mg(OH) 2 formation process. Stream 400, consisting of the Mg(OH) 2 pulp, goes to the wash step.

Paso d), lavado de la pulpa de Mg(OH)2 (corriente 400) con agua fresca para eliminar las impurezas solubles impregnadas en la torta. Step d), washing the Mg(OH) 2 pulp (current 400) with fresh water to eliminate the soluble impurities impregnated in the cake.

Esta etapa se controla mediante la medición de la conductividad del filtrado ya que a mayor conductividad mayor es la presencia de iones disueltos en ella, y el lavado debe realizarse hasta que la conductividad del filtrado sea reducida hasta el valor más bajo y constante posible. Estos valores mínimos de conductividad van desde 450 a 600 pS/cm. This stage is controlled by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate, since the higher the conductivity, the greater the presence of dissolved ions in it, and washing must be carried out until the conductivity of the filtrate is reduced to the lowest and constant value possible. These minimum conductivity values range from 450 to 600 pS/cm.

Paso e), secado del Mg(OH)2 obtenido del Paso d). Step e), drying of the Mg(OH) 2 obtained from Step d).

El producto lavado del Paso d) (corriente 600), es secado en un horno a 80°C por dos días. La pureza de este producto se determina por DRX y análisis químico, lo cual se brinda en la Figura 4. The washed product from Step d) (stream 600) is dried in an oven at 80°C for two days. The purity of this product is determined by XRD and chemical analysis, which is given in Figure 4.

Como se observa en la Figura 4, los difractogramas muestran solamente la presencia de Mg(OH)2, no pudiéndose detectar ninguna otra fase formada, lo que indica una alta pureza del producto. As observed in Figure 4, the diffractograms show only the presence of Mg(OH) 2 , not being able to detect any other phase formed, which indicates a high purity of the product.

Tabla 4. Análisis químico de los productos de Mg(OH)2.

Figure imgf000008_0001
Table 4. Chemical analysis of the Mg(OH) 2 products.
Figure imgf000008_0001

En la Tabla 4, se muestra el resultado de los análisis químicos realizados a ambas muestras de Mg(OH)2. Como se observa, al utilizar la bischofita de la realización inventiva, se obtiene un producto de Mg(OH)2 con una mayor pureza que alcanza el 99,7 %. Por su parte, al utilizar la bischofita que se emplea en el método comparativo, se obtiene un producto de Mg(OH)2 de una menor pureza que alcanza el 99,2 %. Table 4 shows the result of the chemical analyzes performed on both samples of Mg(OH) 2 . As can be seen, when using the bischofite of the inventive embodiment, a Mg(OH) 2 product with a higher purity reaching 99.7% is obtained. For its part, when using the bischofite used in the comparative method, a lower purity Mg(OH) 2 product is obtained, reaching 99.2%.

Esta diferencia en la pureza de los productos obtenidos de Mg(OH)2 es atribuida a que precisamente las impurezas presentes en la bischofita de descarte utilizada en el método de la invención, permiten obtener cristales de mayores dimensiones, que conlleva a que la torta formada presente menores cantidades de agua retenida. Tabla 5. % de agua retenida en la torta de Mg(OH)2.

Figure imgf000009_0001
This difference in the purity of the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained is attributed to the fact that precisely the impurities present in the discarded bischofite used in the method of the invention allow obtaining larger crystals, which leads to the cake formed have lesser amounts of retained water. Table 5. % of water retained in the Mg(OH) 2 cake.
Figure imgf000009_0001

Como se observa en la Tabla 5, la torta de bischofita de la invención presenta un menor porcentaje de agua retenida, lo cual implica menor cantidad de impurezas impregnadas en ella, logrando una pureza mayor en el producto. As observed in Table 5, the bischofite cake of the invention has a lower percentage of retained water, which implies a lower amount of impurities impregnated in it, achieving a higher purity in the product.

- Determinación de los flujos de alimentación en el método que se propone para la obtención de hidróxido de magnesio Mg(OH)2. - Determination of the feed flows in the method proposed for obtaining magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 .

Se utiliza una solución de MgCl2 con una concentración de 36 a 37% en peso, preparado a partir de una bischofita de descarte industrial de 88% de pureza y agua destilada. Como solución básica se emplea una solución de NaOH de 23 a 24% en peso preparada con NaOH de 99% de pureza y agua destilada. Dentro del reactor se prepara una solución de NaCI de 12 a 13% en peso, en una relación en volumen de NaCI/MgCI2 igual a 0,45. A MgCl2 solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight is used, prepared from an 88% pure industrial waste bischofite and distilled water. A 23 to 24% by weight NaOH solution prepared with 99% pure NaOH and distilled water is used as the basic solution. Inside the reactor, a 12 to 13% by weight NaCl solution is prepared, in a volume ratio of NaCl/MgCl 2 equal to 0.45.

Tanto la solución de NaOH y MgCI2 deben alimentarse al mismo tiempo dentro del reactor que contiene la solución NaCI. La velocidad de alimentación de la solución de MgCI2 está basada en función de la velocidad de alimentación de la solución de NaOH, pues el volumen de ambos reactivos es diferente debido a su concentración establecida; por tanto, para que el proceso funcione adecuadamente es necesario que ambos reactivos terminen de alimentarse al mismo tiempo, de este modo, la velocidad de ambos reactivos será diferente. Inicialmente el flujo se expresó en [ml/min], sin embargo, para fines de escalamiento es conveniente expresarlo en [V/h] de solución (donde V representa el volumen de reactor). En el desarrollo de las pruebas experimentales se emplean tres flujos de alimentación de los reactivos (V1 , V2 y V3) como se detalla en la siguiente Tabla 6. Both the NaOH solution and MgCl 2 must be fed at the same time into the reactor containing the NaCl solution. The feeding speed of the MgCI 2 solution is based on the feeding speed of the NaOH solution, since the volume of both reagents is different due to their established concentration; therefore, for the process to work properly it is necessary that both reagents finish feeding at the same time, thus, the speed of both reagents will be different. Initially the flow was expressed in [ml/min], however, for scaling purposes it is convenient to express it in [V/h] of solution (where V represents the volume of the reactor). In the development of the experimental tests, three reagent feed flows are used (V1, V2 and V3) as detailed in the following Table 6.

Tabla 6. Flujos de alimentación de reactivos estudiadas

Figure imgf000009_0002
Table 6. Feed flows of reagents studied
Figure imgf000009_0002

Las condiciones experimentales se detallan en la Tabla 7. Tabla 7. Condiciones de operación para la producción de Mg(OH)2 a partir de bischofita de descarte industrial

Figure imgf000010_0001
The experimental conditions are detailed in Table 7. Table 7. Operating conditions for the production of Mg(OH) 2 from industrial waste bischofite
Figure imgf000010_0001

Los productos de Mg(OH)2 obtenidos a las distintos flujos de alimentación fueron analizados en función de sus propiedades de separación y distribución granulométrica. El primer aspecto evaluado fue el tiempo de filtración de cada muestra. En la Tabla 8 se observan los datos alcanzados en cada caso, donde se aprecia que el menor tiempo de filtración fue para el Mg(OH)2 producido a la velocidad de alimentación V2, tomando un tiempo de 1 ,18 horas para su filtración. Seguido a este se encuentra el producto producido a Vi y finalmente V3. Con estas pruebas se pudo evidenciar que una velocidad demasiado baja o alta hace que el tiempo de filtración sea prolongado, pero una velocidad media entre estos valores (velocidad óptima) permite que el tiempo de filtración sea menor. Esto permitió que el producto producido con flujos de alimentación de los reactivos representados a través de V2 requiere menos etapas de filtración, lo cual implica menos costos energéticos en operaciones de lavado del producto como se observa en la Figura 6. The Mg(OH) 2 products obtained from the different feed streams were analyzed based on their separation properties and granulometric distribution. The first aspect evaluated was the filtration time of each sample. Table 8 shows the data obtained in each case, where it can be seen that the shortest filtration time was for the Mg(OH) 2 produced at the feeding speed V 2 , taking a time of 1.18 hours for its filtration. . Following this is the product produced at Vi and finally V 3 . With these tests it was possible to show that a speed that is too low or high causes the filtration time to be prolonged, but an average speed between these values (optimum speed) allows the filtration time to be shorter. This allowed the product produced with feed flows of the reagents represented through V 2 to require fewer filtration stages, which implies less energy costs in product washing operations, as observed in Figure 6.

Tabla 8. Tiempos de filtrado de las muestras de Mg(OH)2 producidas a diferentes flujos de alimentación de reactivos.

Figure imgf000010_0002
Table 8. Filtration times of the Mg(OH) 2 samples produced at different reagent feed rates.
Figure imgf000010_0002

La Figura 6 muestra que el Mg(OH)2 producido a V2 requiere 6 etapas de lavado en comparación a Vi que requirió 10 y V3 que requirió 7 etapas para llegar a la conductividad más baja en el filtrado. Esto se debe a los distintos tamaños de cristales obtenidos en los diferentes flujos de alimentación de reactivos, como se muestra en la Figura 7. Pues cristales de grandes dimensiones permite reducir el efecto coloidal que forman las suspensiones de Mg(OH)2, de esta manera las operaciones de sedimentación y filtración se facilita. Figure 6 shows that the Mg(OH) 2 produced at V 2 requires 6 washing steps compared to Vi which required 10 and V 3 which required 7 steps to reach the lowest conductivity in the filtrate. This is due to the different sizes of crystals obtained in the different reagent feed flows, as shown in Figure 7. Large crystals allow reducing the colloidal effect formed by Mg(OH) 2 suspensions, thus way the sedimentation and filtration operations are facilitated.

Con una velocidad de alimentación de reactivos V2, la distribución granulométrica del producto tiene un mayor porcentaje de cristales de mayores dimensiones en comparación a los otros productos. Como se observa en la Tabla 9 el D50 y D90 del producto obtenido con flujos de alimentación de los reactivos representados a través de V2 presenta dimensiones con valores de 70,05 pm y 197,8 pm respectivamente, superiores a los otros casos. With a feed rate of reagents V 2 , the granulometric distribution of the product has a higher percentage of larger crystals compared to the other products. As observed in Table 9, the D 50 and D 90 of the product obtained with flows of feeding of the reagents represented through V 2 presents dimensions with values of 70.05 pm and 197.8 pm respectively, higher than the other cases.

Tabla 9. Percentiles de distribución granulométrica de los productos de Mg(OH)2 obtenidos a diferentes flujos de alimentación de reactivos.

Figure imgf000011_0001
Table 9. Percentiles of granulometric distribution of the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained at different reagent feed flows.
Figure imgf000011_0001

Para una caracterización completa de los productos obtenidos se realizó un análisis químico para determinar el nivel de pureza alcanzado en las condiciones estudiadas. For a complete characterization of the products obtained, a chemical analysis was carried out to determine the level of purity reached under the conditions studied.

Tabla 10. Análisis químico de los productos de Mg(OH)2 obtenidos a diferentes flujos de alimentación.

Figure imgf000011_0002
Table 10. Chemical analysis of the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained at different feed flows.
Figure imgf000011_0002

Como puede observarse en la Tabla 10, en todos los casos la pureza del producto alcanzó un valor cercano a 99,7 %. Por tanto puede inferirse que sintetizando Mg(OH)2 con bischofita de descarte industrial de acuerdo al método propuesto, es posible alcanzar una alta pureza en el producto. Sin embargo, como se observó en los apartados anteriores, la diferencia radica en las operaciones de separación, pues si bien todos los productos son de alta pureza, algunos requieren de más etapas de lavado y tiempo de filtrado mayor. Por tanto, es posible concluir, que los flujos óptimos de alimentación de los reactivos son los que se describen en la Tabla 6 por V2, para los cuales se puede alcanzar un tiempo de filtrado de 1 ,18 horas en promedio, 6 etapas de lavado, una distribución granulométrica mayor, para una pureza del producto Mg(OH)2 de 99,7 %. Así, la presente invención se relaciona con un método para obtener hidróxido de magnesio Mg(OH)2 con una pureza elevada del 99,7 % a partir de bischofita de descarte sin tratamiento previo, que comprende los siguientes pasos: a) preparación de los reactivos que consiste en: disolver bischofita de descarte en agua formando una disolución con una concentración de 36 a 37% en peso de bischofita; y paralelamente preparar una solución alcalina de NaOH de pureza del 99 %, en agua formando una disolución de 23 a 24% en peso de NaOH; en donde la bischofita de descarte contiene la siguiente composición porcentual:

Figure imgf000012_0001
b) alimentar los reactivos preparados en a) al reactor para conducir una cristalización reactiva para la formación de Mg(OH)2, controlando la sobresaturación por cambio de pH, y empleando una solución de NaCI con una concentración de 12 a 13% en peso, y una relación en volumen de NaCI/MgCI2 de 0,45; y donde la solución de NaCI se encuentra dentro del reactor de formación de Mg(OH)2 antes del ingreso de los reactivos preparados en a) para evitar cambios significativos de pH cuando se ingresen los reactivos al reactor, favoreciendo el crecimiento de los cristales de Mg(OH)2, y donde los reactivos son alimentados al reactor de manera paralela, lentamente y a bajo flujo preferiblemente de 4,5 y 1 1 ,25 ml/min (0,33 y 0,82 volumen de reactor/h) para el álcali y bischofita respectivamente, manteniendo la alimentación de NaOH (ac) hasta alcanzar un pH de 12 o punto isoeléctrico del Mg(OH)2 dentro del reactor; y la temperatura a 80°C, con agitación constante y un tiempo de reacción de 2,5 a 3 horas; c) separar de la solución obtenida en b), sólido y líquido, mediante filtración, preferentemente mediante filtro prensa; d) lavado de la pulpa de Mg(OH)2 obtenida en c) con agua fresca para eliminar las impurezas solubles impregnadas en la torta, y controlando la presencia de iones disueltos mediante la medición de la conductividad del filtrado, y manteniendo el lavado hasta que la conductividad del filtrado sea reducida hasta el valor más bajo y constante posible, incluyendo valores mínimos de conductividad en el rango desde 450 a 600 pS/cm; e) secado del Mg(OH)2 obtenido en d) a una temperatura de 80°C, preferentemente en un horno de secado. f) antes de la etapa c), reducir la generación de agregados, mediante tiempos prolongados de envejecimiento de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 una vez concluida la reacción dentro del reactor, lo que favorece la disolución de cristales en la solución y su precipitación posterior, incorporándose en la matriz de otros cristales de mayores dimensiones, y opcionalmente g) después de la etapa c), recircular al reactor la solución de NaCI reacondicionada, usándola como aditivo y medio de reacción en lugar de alimentar una solución fresca de NaCI luego de cada proceso de formación de Mg(OH)2. As can be seen in Table 10, in all cases the purity of the product reached a value close to 99.7%. Therefore, it can be inferred that by synthesizing Mg(OH) 2 with industrial waste bischofite according to the proposed method, it is possible to achieve a high purity in the product. However, as observed in the previous sections, the difference lies in the separation operations, because although all the products are of high purity, some require more washing stages and longer filtering time. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that the optimal feed flows of the reagents are those described in Table 6 by V 2 , for which a filtering time of 1.18 hours on average can be achieved, 6 stages of washing, a larger particle size distribution, for a purity of the Mg(OH) 2 product of 99.7%. Thus, the present invention relates to a method for obtaining magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 with a high purity of 99.7% from discarded bischofite without prior treatment, which comprises the following steps: a) preparation of the reagents consisting of: dissolving discarded bischofite in water, forming a solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight of bischofite; and in parallel prepare an alkaline solution of NaOH of 99% purity, in water forming a solution of 23 to 24% by weight of NaOH; where the discarded bischofite contains the following percentage composition:
Figure imgf000012_0001
b) feeding the reagents prepared in a) to the reactor to conduct a reactive crystallization for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 , controlling the supersaturation by changing the pH, and using a NaCl solution with a concentration of 12 to 13% by weight , and a NaCI/MgCI 2 volume ratio of 0.45; and where the NaCI solution is inside the Mg(OH) 2 formation reactor before the reagents prepared in a) enter to avoid significant pH changes when the reagents enter the reactor, favoring the growth of NaCl crystals. Mg(OH) 2 , and where the reactants are fed to the reactor in parallel, slowly and at a flow preferably of 4.5 and 11.25 ml/min (0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h) to the alkali and bischofite respectively, maintaining the NaOH (aq) feed until reaching a pH of 12 or the isoelectric point of Mg(OH) 2 inside the reactor; and the temperature at 80°C, with constant stirring and a reaction time of 2.5 to 3 hours; c) separating solid and liquid from the solution obtained in b), by filtration, preferably by filter press; d) washing the Mg(OH) 2 pulp obtained in c) with fresh water to eliminate the soluble impurities impregnated in the cake, and controlling the presence of dissolved ions by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate, and maintaining the washing until that the conductivity of the filtrate be reduced to the lowest and constant value possible, including minimum values of conductivity in the range from 450 to 600 pS/cm; e) drying the Mg(OH) 2 obtained in d) at a temperature of 80°C, preferably in a drying oven. f) before stage c), reduce the generation of aggregates, through prolonged aging times of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals once the reaction has concluded within the reactor, which favors the dissolution of crystals in the solution and their subsequent precipitation, incorporating other larger crystals into the matrix, and optionally g) after stage c), recirculating the reconditioned NaCl solution to the reactor, using it as additive and reaction medium instead of feeding a fresh NaCl solution after each Mg(OH) 2 formation process.

Ejemplo. Example.

Producción de Mo(OH)2 a partir de bischofita de descarte del salar de Atacama. Production of Mo(OH) 2 from discarded bischofite from the Atacama salt flat.

Se obtiene Mg(OH)2 mediante cristalización por reacción química a partir de bischofita de descarte con la composición que se brinda en la Tabla 1 . Se usa el proceso y diagrama de flujo de las figuras 1 A y 1 B. Mg(OH) 2 is obtained by crystallization by chemical reaction from discarded bischofite with the composition given in Table 1. The process and flowchart of figures 1 A and 1 B are used.

Como ya se mencionó antes, la producción de Mg(OH)2 presenta inconvenientes ya que al ser un producto con características coloidales, la filtración del mismo resulta una operación compleja de realizar. Esto dificulta realizar un lavado adecuado, por lo que quedan muchas impurezas impregnadas. El efecto coloidal también se manifiesta en la cantidad de energía y tiempo empleado en la filtración. Para superar estas limitaciones se usa NaCI como medio de reacción y aditivo en la cristalización, y flujos bajos de alimentación de reactivos al reactor para controlar el tamaño de cristal. Con estos parámetros de control, se obtienen cristales de mayor tamaño, se reduce el tiempo de filtrado y se realiza un lavado efectivo, siendo una etapa clave para obtener un producto altamente puro. Las condiciones de operación utilizadas en este ejemplo se señalan más adelante. As already mentioned before, the production of Mg(OH) 2 presents drawbacks since, being a product with colloidal characteristics, its filtration is a complex operation to carry out. This makes it difficult to wash properly, so many impurities remain impregnated. The colloidal effect is also manifested in the amount of energy and time spent on filtration. To overcome these limitations, NaCl is used as reaction medium and additive in crystallization, and low flows of reagent feed to the reactor to control crystal size. With these control parameters, larger crystals are obtained, filtering time is reduced and effective washing is performed, being a key step to obtain a highly pure product. The operating conditions used in this example are noted below.

1-A Preparación de reactivos para la producción de Mg(OH)2 y establecimiento de parámetros de operación. 1-A Preparation of reagents for the production of Mg(OH) 2 and establishment of operating parameters.

Se usaron las siguientes fuentes de Magnesio: The following Magnesium sources were used:

1 - bischofita industrial de zona de descartes, teniendo una pureza de 88,08%, (utilizada en el método inventivo). 1 - industrial bischofite from the discard area, having a purity of 88.08%, (used in the inventive method).

2- bischofita industrial purificada, teniendo una pureza de 94,52% (utilizada en el método comparativo) 2- purified industrial bischofite, having a purity of 94.52% (used in the comparative method)

3- , grado analítico de 99% de pureza (Sigma Aldrich) (utilizada en el método

Figure imgf000013_0001
control). 3- , analytical grade of 99% purity (Sigma Aldrich) (used in the method
Figure imgf000013_0001
control).

El NaOH usado como reactivo para la conversión de MgCI2 a Mg(OH)2 es, de grado analítico, con una pureza de 99% (Sigma Aldrich). The NaOH used as reagent for the conversion of MgCI 2 to Mg(OH) 2 is of analytical grade, with a purity of 99% (Sigma Aldrich).

El NaCI usado como aditivo, tiene una pureza de 99% (Sigma Aldrich). The NaCI used as additive has a purity of 99% (Sigma Aldrich).

Las concentraciones de los reactivos empleados para el desarrollo del proceso de producción de Mg(OH)2 se detalla en la Tabla 1 1 .

Figure imgf000014_0001
The concentrations of the reagents used for the development of the Mg(OH) 2 production process are detailed in Table 1 1 .
Figure imgf000014_0001

Las condiciones de operación utilizadas en el proceso se detallan en la Tabla 12. The operating conditions used in the process are detailed in Table 12.

Tabla 12. Condiciones de operación para la producción de Mg(OH)2

Figure imgf000014_0002
Table 12. Operating conditions for the production of Mg(OH) 2
Figure imgf000014_0002

Se utiliza un reactor de vidrio de 2 litros de capacidad aislado térmicamente para evitar la pérdida de calor, la temperatura se mantuvo constante con un baño termostático (baño termostático Lauda RE 107), la agitación fue permanente (agitador IKA RW20), los flujos de alimentación de cada reactivo fueron impulsaron con bombas peristálticas (2, bombas peristálticas Watson- Marlow 520). La alimentación de MgCl2 y NaOH en solución, al reactor que ya contiene la solución de NaCI, fue simultánea. La proporción en volumen de NaCI/MgCh es igual a 0,45.A thermally insulated 2-liter glass reactor is used to avoid heat loss, the temperature was kept constant with a thermostatic bath (Lauda RE 107 thermostatic bath), stirring was permanent (IKA RW20 stirrer), the flows of feeding of each reagent were driven with peristaltic pumps (2, Watson-Marlow 520 peristaltic pumps). The feeding of MgCl2 and NaOH in solution, to the reactor that already contains the NaCl solution, was simultaneous. The volume ratio of NaCl/MgCh is equal to 0.45.

Como se observa en la Tabla 12, el flujo de alimentación de los reactivos es baja, ya que para el proceso de producción de Mg(OH)2 se debe tener cuidado en la etapa de sobresaturación. Es importante controlar el ritmo en el cual se agrega el precipitante, debido a que, si se genera un medio con un grado de sobresaturación, mayor será la rapidez de nucleación, provocando la formación de un mayor número de núcleos por unidad de tiempo, y por ende, la obtención de cristales más pequeños con formas geométricas no definidas. Los cristales pequeños afectan también en la calidad del precipitado, esto se debe a que presentan una mayor distribución superficial que los cristales grandes. Una distribución superficial grande en los cristales los hace susceptibles a tener mayor grado de adsorción de impurezas, provocando que el precipitado se contamine y altere su calidad, estructura o aspecto sólido (G. D. Christian, Química analítica, Sexta ed. México, 2009). 1-B Producción de Mg(OH)2 a partir de bischofita de descarte. As observed in Table 12, the feed flow of the reagents is low, since care must be taken in the supersaturation stage for the Mg(OH) 2 production process. It is important to control the rate at which the precipitant is added, because if a medium with a degree of supersaturation is generated, the nucleation rate will be greater, causing the formation of a greater number of nuclei per unit of time, and therefore, obtaining smaller crystals with undefined geometric shapes. Small crystals also affect the quality of the precipitate, this is because they have a greater surface distribution than large crystals. A large surface distribution in the crystals makes them susceptible to a higher degree of adsorption of impurities, causing the precipitate to become contaminated and alter its quality, structure or solid appearance (GD Christian, Analytical Chemistry, Sixth ed. Mexico, 2009). 1-B Production of Mg(OH) 2 from discarded bischofite.

Como se desprende del diagrama de Pourbaix (Figura 8 (A)), el pH al cual el Mg(OH)2 comienza a formarse es 6,8, a partir de este valor la reacción comienza a desarrollarse hasta Hegar al equilibrio. En este caso, la alimentación del NaOH para incrementar el pH del sistema se realizó hasta alcanzar el valor del punto isoeléctrico, es decir pH de 12 para el caso de Mg(OH)2. De esta manera, se aseguró una conversión alta de la reacción sin excedentes de reactivos. Para determinar el rendimiento de la reacción se realizó un análisis químico del ion Mg2+, mediante un balance iónico y se determinó que el rendimiento fue de 98,37% en promedio. As can be seen from the Pourbaix diagram (Figure 8 (A)), the pH at which Mg(OH) 2 begins to form is 6.8, from this value the reaction begins to develop until reaching equilibrium. In this case, the feeding of NaOH to increase the pH of the system was carried out until reaching the value of the isoelectric point, that is, pH of 12 in the case of Mg(OH) 2 . In this way, a high conversion of the reaction was ensured without excess reagents. To determine the yield of the reaction, a chemical analysis of the Mg 2+ ion was carried out, using an ionic balance and it was determined that the yield was 98.37% on average.

Los diferentes productos de Mg(OH)2 fueron caracterizados para determinar sus propiedades físicas y químicas. Los resultados se muestran a continuación: The different Mg(OH) 2 products were characterized to determine their physical and chemical properties. The results are shown below:

Caracterización química del Mq(OH)2. Chemical characterization of Mq(OH) 2 .

Para lograr un producto de Mg(OH)2 de alta pureza, la etapa más importante es el lavado, ya que esta operación unitaria permite liberar a los cristales de las soluciones impregnadas que están cargadas de impurezas. Al tratarse de un producto con una solubilidad muy baja, resulta muy conveniente que las impurezas se encuentren en estado acuoso, por lo cual, el uso de NaOH como reactante permitió obtener las impurezas en estado acuoso. To achieve a high purity Mg(OH) 2 product, the most important step is washing, since this single operation allows the crystals to be freed from impregnated solutions that are laden with impurities. As it is a product with a very low solubility, it is very convenient that the impurities are in the aqueous state, therefore, the use of NaOH as a reactant allowed obtaining the impurities in the aqueous state.

Como se observa en la Tabla 1 , las impurezas mayoritarias en el sistema son el Na+ y K, las que al reaccionar con NaOH y MgCI2*6H2O, se obtienen como posibles subproductos: NaOH, KOH, KCI y NaCI, este último como subproducto principal de la reacción de formación de Mg(OH)2 y restante de la solución aditivo, los cuales son eliminados en gran parte en la filtración del producto, que separa el queque formado de Mg(OH)2 de la solución que contiene las impurezas en estado acuoso. El resto de impurezas impregnadas en los cristales fue eliminado mediante lavado con agua destilada a 80°C, con una relación en peso de 2:1 de agua destilada y queque de Mg(OH)2 respectivamente, hasta obtener un producto de alta pureza. As observed in Table 1 , the main impurities in the system are Na + and K, which, when reacting with NaOH and MgCI 2 *6H 2 O, are obtained as possible by-products: NaOH, KOH, KCI and NaCI, this The latter as the main by-product of the reaction for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 and the remainder of the additive solution, which are largely eliminated in the filtration of the product, which separates the cake formed from Mg(OH) 2 from the solution that contains impurities in aqueous state. The remaining impurities impregnated in the crystals were removed by washing with distilled water at 80°C, with a 2:1 weight ratio of distilled water and Mg(OH) 2 cake, respectively, until a high purity product was obtained.

En el proceso de lavado se presentan algunos factores que afectan el rendimiento de este, los más importantes son el tamaño y la forma del cristal. La etapa de purificación de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 y el efecto que tuvo la granulometría y morfología de los mismos se describe más adelante en detalle. In the washing process there are some factors that affect its performance, the most important are the size and shape of the crystal. The purification stage of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals and the effect of their granulometry and morphology are described in detail later.

Otra impureza de importancia es el H3BO3, que se encuentra en estado sólido en el sistema. El ácido bórico es levemente soluble en agua, pero su solubilidad se incrementa con el aumento de la temperatura. Además, su solubilidad es fuertemente disminuida por la presencia de ciertos iones como NaCI y LiCI (/W. O and D. A. N., "Análisis de la solubilidad del ácido bórico, " Central Nuclear Atucha U22007). Ya que en el sistema existe una alta concentración de NaCI la solubilidad del H3BO3 es muy reducida. Por otro lado, el B(OH)4 que es un estado iónico del ácido bórico, es altamente soluble en agua. Para determinar las condiciones a la que esta fase es estable en un sistema acuoso, se recurrió a un diagrama de Pourbaix (Figura 8 (B)). Este diagrama nos muestra que a un pH superior a 7,4, la fase estable del ácido bórico es B(OH)4 _, esto resulta muy conveniente ya que como se mencionó anteriormente, el pH de trabajo del sistema es 12, por lo cual el boro será eliminado en la filtración en la forma B(OH)4, así como también en la etapa de lavado, ya que la cantidad de Mg(OH)2 que se disuelve en esta etapa hace que la solución alcance un pH de 10,35. Another important impurity is H3BO3, which is in the solid state in the system. Boric acid is slightly soluble in water, but its solubility increases with increasing temperature. In addition, its solubility is strongly decreased by the presence of certain ions such as NaCI and LiCI (/W. O and DAN, "Analysis of the solubility of boric acid," Central Nuclear Atucha U22007). Since there is a high concentration of NaCI in the system, the solubility of H3BO3 is very low. On the other hand, B(OH) 4 , which is an ionic state of boric acid, is highly soluble in water. To determine the conditions under which this phase is stable in an aqueous system, a Pourbaix diagram was used (Figure 8 (B)). This diagram shows us that at a pH greater than 7.4, the stable phase of boric acid is B(OH) 4 _ , this is very convenient since, as mentioned above, the working pH of system is 12, so boron will be removed in the filtration in the B(OH) 4 form, as well as in the washing stage, since the amount of Mg(OH) 2 that dissolves in this stage makes the solution reaches a pH of 10.35.

Análisis químico. Chemical analysis.

Para medir la eficiencia del lavado se realizó un análisis químico para determinar la pureza del Mg(OH)2 y la cantidad de impurezas presentes en las muestras. Posterior al proceso de lavado, las muestras de Mg(OH)2 fueron secadas en un horno a 100°C . Los resultados se presentan en la Tabla 13. To measure the washing efficiency, a chemical analysis was performed to determine the purity of Mg(OH) 2 and the amount of impurities present in the samples. After the washing process, the Mg(OH) 2 samples were dried in an oven at 100°C. The results are presented in Table 13.

Tabla 13. Análisis químico de las muestras de Mg(OH)2

Figure imgf000016_0003
Table 13. Chemical analysis of the Mg(OH) 2 samples
Figure imgf000016_0003

Como se observa en la Tabla 13 el producto obtenido en la realización de la invención alcanza una pureza más elevada respecto al ejemplo comparativo. Usando la bischofita más impura de 88,04% de pureza, se logra obtener un producto de Mg(OH)2 con una pureza mayor en un 0,5%, en comparación al producto obtenido con la bischofita de 94,54% de pureza. As observed in Table 13, the product obtained in carrying out the invention reaches a higher purity with respect to the comparative example. Using the most impure bischofite of 88.04% purity, it is possible to obtain a Mg(OH) 2 product with a higher purity of 0.5%, compared to the product obtained with the bischofite of 94.54% purity. .

Sin adherirse a ninguna teoría, esto puede ser atribuido al efecto de las impurezas y sus concentraciones presentes en la bischofita industrial utilizada, que modificó el tamaño y la forma de los cristales de Mg(OH)2, lo que se analiza y describe más adelante al referirse a la granulometría y morfología del producto. En resumen, el lavado resultó tener un buen rendimiento. Without adhering to any theory, this can be attributed to the effect of the impurities and their concentrations present in the industrial bischofite used, which modified the size and shape of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals, which is analyzed and described later. when referring to the granulometry and morphology of the product. In summary, the wash turned out to have a good performance.

El producto MgControi que se obtiene a través del método control en que se emplea

Figure imgf000016_0002
grado analítico de 99% de pureza, responde al producto de mayor pureza. En este producto, la presencia de Na y Cl es atribuida al subproducto de reacción que se generó y el aditivo de NaCI presente durante la reacción, sin embargo, las concentraciones presentes en el producto son muy bajos, en el orden de los “ppm” como se ve en la Tabla 13. Además, la presencia de B, que se atribuye como impureza de utilizado, es la más baja en comparación a los demás
Figure imgf000016_0001
productos. Como se observa, al trabajar con reactivos de alta pureza la presencia de impurezas es insignificante y no presentan mayor problema en las etapas de filtrado, pudiendo obtener un producto de 99,9% de pureza. Por su parte el producto Mg comparativo que se obtiene a través del método comparativo que emplea bischofita purificada de pureza 94.54 %, se observa en este producto que mediante el lavado se logró eliminar el 99,54% del Na+ presente como impureza en la bischofita. Con respecto al K+, se logró eliminar el 99,99% de este ion. Evaluando el Cl, se logra eliminar el 95,2%, y finalmente respecto al boro se elimina un 73,68%, lográndose finalmente una pureza de 99,23% como Mg(OH)2. The Mg C ontroi product that is obtained through the control method in which it is used
Figure imgf000016_0002
analytical degree of 99% purity, responds to the highest purity product. In this product, the presence of Na and Cl is attributed to the reaction by-product that was generated and the NaCI additive present during the reaction, however, the concentrations present in the product are very low, in the order of "ppm". as seen in Table 13. In addition, the presence of B, which is attributed as an impurity used, is the lowest compared to the other
Figure imgf000016_0001
products. As can be seen, when working with high purity reagents, the presence of impurities is negligible and they do not present a major problem in the filtration stages, being able to obtain a product of 99.9% purity. For its part, the comparative Mg product that is obtained through the comparative method that uses purified bischofite of 94.54% purity, it is observed in this product that by washing it was possible to eliminate 99.54% of the Na + present as impurity in the bischofite. . Regarding K + , it was possible to eliminate 99.99% of this ion. Evaluating Cl, 95.2% is eliminated, and finally, with respect to boron, 73.68% is eliminated, finally achieving a purity of 99.23% as Mg(OH) 2 .

Analizando el producto Mginvento obtenido de acuerdo con el método que se propone en esta solicitud, y que utiliza bischofita de descarte con pureza de 88 %, mediante el lavado se logró eliminar un 99,33% del Na+ presente como impureza en la bischofita. Respecto al K+, se logró eliminar el 99,9%. Evaluando el cloro, se logró eliminar el 97,1%, y finalmente respecto al boro se eliminó un 92,14%. Lográndose finalmente un producto de Mg(OH)2 con una pureza de 99,72%. Las demás impurezas presentes en las bischofitas industriales utilizadas, no fueron detectados por el análisis químico, por lo cual se puede asumir que se encuentran en una cantidad menor a 1 ppm. Analyzing the product Mg invention obtained according to the method proposed in this application, and that uses discarded bischofite with a purity of 88%, through washing it was possible to eliminate 99.33% of the Na + present as impurity in the bischofite . Regarding K + , 99.9% was eliminated. Evaluating chlorine, 97.1% was eliminated, and finally, regarding boron, 92.14% was eliminated. Finally achieving a product of Mg(OH) 2 with a purity of 99.72%. The other impurities present in the industrial bischophytes used were not detected by the chemical analysis, so it can be assumed that they are found in less than 1 ppm.

Análisis por DRX XRD analysis

El análisis se realizó por difracción de rayos X en polvo usando un difractómetro. La fuente de radiación (CuKa) era una lámpara de cobre con una longitud de onda de X = 0,154 nm. La radiación Ka de cobre se generó a 20 mA y 40 KV. Se realizó el estudio a los productos de Mg(OH)2 obtenidos, los resultados se muestran en la Figura 4. Analysis was performed by X-ray powder diffraction using a diffractometer. The radiation source (CuKa) was a copper lamp with a wavelength of X = 0.154 nm. Copper Ka radiation was generated at 20 mA and 40 KV. The study was carried out on the Mg(OH) 2 products obtained, the results are shown in Figure 4.

Para realizar la identificación de los espectrogramas de los productos analizados, se utilizó el programa Match que pudo evidenciar que los peaks corresponden a la fase de Mg(OH)2. Como muestra la Figura 4, además del Mg(OH)2 no se identificó otra fase, pudiendo existir impurezas pero en una proporción muy baja que este método no puede identificar. To identify the spectrograms of the analyzed products, the Match program was used, which could show that the peaks correspond to the Mg(OH) 2 phase. As shown in Figure 4, in addition to Mg(OH) 2 , no other phase was identified, and impurities may exist, but in a very low proportion that this method cannot identify.

Analizando con más detalle los espectrogramas, se encontró que no existe ningún desfase en los ángulos 20, respecto a los peaks de mayor intensidad, esto indica que en los productos obtenidos no existe alguna variación en los espacios interplanares. Sin embargo, en los espectros de la muestras de Mg(OH)2 inventivo y comparativo se puede observar una ampliación en el ancho de los peaks. Este fenómeno se debe a cierta pérdida de cristalinidad en las muestras de Mg(OH)2 sintetizadas con bischofita. La cristalinidad está relacionada con el grado de orden y el tamaño del cristal de una sustancia cristalina dada (Y. Sa, Y. Guo, X. Feng, M. Wang, P. Li, Y. Gao, et al., "Are different crystallinity-index-calculating methods of hydroxyapatite efficient and consistent?," New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 41, pp. 5723-5731, 2017). Al existir mayor cantidad de impurezas en las bischofitas empleadas para producir Mg inventivo y Mg comparativo, estas se absorbieron en la superficie cristalina causando ciertas dislocaciones en la fila de puntos de la red de Bravais (A. G. Jones, Crystallization Process Systems. Oxfor, 2002 y J. P. M. Syvitski, Principle, methods, and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge, 2007). Caracterización física del Mg(OH)2. Analyzing the spectrograms in more detail, it was found that there is no lag in the angles 20, with respect to the highest intensity peaks, this indicates that in the products obtained there is no variation in the interplanar spaces. However, in the spectra of the inventive and comparative Mg(OH) 2 samples, a broadening in the width of the peaks can be observed. This phenomenon is due to some loss of crystallinity in the Mg(OH) 2 samples synthesized with bischofite. Crystallinity is related to the degree of order and the size of the crystal of a given crystalline substance (Y. Sa, Y. Guo, X. Feng, M. Wang, P. Li, Y. Gao, et al., "Are different crystallinity-index-calculating methods of hydroxyapatite efficient and consistent?," New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 41, pp. 5723-5731, 2017). As there is a greater amount of impurities in the bischophytes used to produce inventive Mg and comparative Mg, these were absorbed on the crystalline surface, causing certain dislocations in the row of points of the Bravais lattice (AG Jones, Crystallization Process Systems. Oxfor, 2002 and JPM Syvitski, Principle, methods, and application of particle size analysis, Cambridge, 2007). Physical characterization of Mg(OH) 2 .

El análisis granulométrico por medición de reflectancia de haz enfocado de las muestras de Mg(OH)2 se realizaron mediante medición por reflectancia de haz enfocado con la sonda FBRM. Los resultados del análisis se muestran en la Figura 5, y Tabla 14. The granulometric analysis by focused beam reflectance measurement of the Mg(OH) 2 samples was performed by focused beam reflectance measurement with the FBRM probe. The results of the analysis are shown in Figure 5, and Table 14.

Tabla 14. Dimensiones de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 para diferentes fuentes d

Figure imgf000018_0003
Table 14. Dimensions of Mg(OH) 2 crystals for different sources of d
Figure imgf000018_0003

Evaluando la Tabla 14, los datos cuantitativos de tamaño de partícula muestran que el D10 para las tres muestras son aproximadas, siendo el mayor para Mginvento. Evaluando el D50 podemos apreciar una gran variación de los tamaños de partícula de los cristales de Mg invento y Mgcomparativo con respecto a Mgcontrol, ya que el D50 de Mgcomparativo (producido a partir de bischofita de 94,54%) es 46,4% mayor en tamaño que Mgcontrol(producido a partir de

Figure imgf000018_0002
pura), y el D50 de Mg invento (producido a partir de bischofita de 84,04%) es 48,1% mayor en tamaño en comparación a Mgcontrol. Analizando el D90 la variación de tamaños se hace más grande. El D90 de Mgcomparativo presenta un tamaño mayor en 53,44% en comparación al D90 para Mgcontrol. El D90 para Mginvento presenta un tamaño mayor en 55,39% en comparación al D90 para Mgcontrol. Con esto podemos inferir que la existencia de mayor impurezas o iones disueltos en el sistema permite obtener cristales de mayor tamaño. Las impurezas de las bischofitas utilizadas actuaron de la misma manera como aditivos en el sistema, estos iones ajenos a la fase cristalizada se absorbieron en la superficie cristalina, permitiendo una difusión adecuada de los iones Mg, como se explicó anteriormente. Las existencias de mayores concentraciones de impurezas que actúen como aditivos permitió obtener cristales más grandes. En promedio, la presencia de impurezas en el
Figure imgf000018_0001
permitió incrementar en un 50% el tamaño de la partícula. Evaluating Table 14, the quantitative particle size data shows that the D 10 for all three samples are approximate, with the largest being for Mg invention . Evaluating the D 50 we can see a large variation in the particle sizes of the Mg invention and comparative Mg crystals with respect to control Mg, since the D 50 of comparative Mg (produced from 94.54% bischofite) is 46.4% larger in size than Mg control (produced from
Figure imgf000018_0002
pure), and the Mg invention D 50 (produced from 84.04% bischofite) is 48.1% larger in size compared to the Mg control . Analyzing the D 90 the size variation becomes larger. The D 90 for comparative Mg presents a larger size by 53.44% compared to the D 90 for Mg control . The D90 for Mg invention presents a larger size by 55.39% compared to the D 90 for Mg control . With this we can infer that the existence of greater impurities or dissolved ions in the system allows obtaining larger crystals. The impurities of the bischophytes used acted in the same way as additives in the system, these ions foreign to the crystallized phase were absorbed on the crystalline surface, allowing an adequate diffusion of the Mg ions, as explained above. Stocks of higher concentrations of impurities that act as additives allowed obtaining larger crystals. On average, the presence of impurities in the
Figure imgf000018_0001
allowed to increase the particle size by 50%.

Sin embargo, analizando la uniformidad de la distribución de partículas, la muestra Mgcontrol es la única que presenta cristales con tamaños homogéneos. Sin embargo, los valores de CU (coeficiente de uniformidad) de Minvento y Mgcomparativo son mayores a 5, lo que indica que estos cristales no presentan tamaños homogéneos. Esto muestra que, el uso de materia prima de menor pureza genera mayor dispersión en la distribución granulométrica, lo cual puede traer complicaciones al proceso de filtrado ya que como se indicó anteriormente, el efecto adverso a la presencia de impurezas en el sistema genera que las partículas más pequeñas se agrupen de forma globular formando agregados. La presencia de agregados puede reducirse con tiempos prolongados de envejecimiento de cristal. Análisis por SEM para el estudio morfológico del producto However, when analyzing the uniformity of the particle distribution, the Mg control sample is the only one that presents crystals with homogeneous sizes. However, the values of CU (uniformity coefficient) of M invention and comparative Mg are greater than 5, which indicates that these crystals do not have homogeneous sizes. This shows that the use of lower purity raw material generates greater dispersion in the granulometric distribution, which can bring complications to the filtering process since, as previously indicated, the adverse effect of the presence of impurities in the system causes the smaller particles clump together in a globular fashion to form aggregates. The presence of aggregates can be reduced with prolonged crystal aging times. SEM analysis for the morphological study of the product

El estudio morfológico de las muestras de Mg(OH)2 se realiza mediante una caracterización SEM. Las partículas se evaluaron mediante análisis de electrones retrodispersados (BSE) y electrones secundarios (SE). Los resultados son presentados en las Figuras 9A-9C. The morphological study of the Mg(OH) 2 samples is carried out by means of a SEM characterization. The particles were evaluated by backscattered electron (BSE) and secondary electron (SE) analysis. The results are presented in Figures 9A-9C.

El análisis BSE tiene la ventaja de ser sensible a las variaciones en el número atómico de los elementos presentes en la superficie de la muestra. Con este análisis podemos ver de manera cualitativa la existencia de alguna impureza significante, mediante alguna variación de color en la superficie de la muestra. Como puede observarse en las Figuras 9A-9C, en los tres casos se observa una tonalidad de gris uniforme sobre la superficie de las muestras. Esto indica que las impurezas se encuentran en muy pequeñas proporciones que no pueden ser detectadas por el equipo. BSE analysis has the advantage of being sensitive to variations in the atomic number of the elements present on the surface of the sample. With this analysis we can qualitatively see the existence of some significant impurity, through some color variation on the surface of the sample. As can be seen in Figures 9A-9C, in all three cases a uniform shade of gray is observed on the surface of the samples. This indicates that the impurities are in very small proportions that cannot be detected by the equipment.

En las Figuras 10A y 10B se muestra el análisis SEM de la muestra Mgcontrol a partir de electrones secundarios SE, para analizar de mejor manera la morfología cristalina. En la Figura 9A se observa la distribución homogénea de estos cristales del producto Mgcontrol, y como se aprecia estos cristales presentan un rango de tamaño no muy amplio, con una buena uniformidad, ya que como se observa, la diferencia entre los tamaños no es muy grande. La imagen 10B muestra un aspecto muy importante, los cristales de menor tamaño tienen una forma cuasi esférica, lo cual podría ser beneficioso para el proceso de lavado. Otra observación de importancia es que MgControi no muestra una presencia considerable de aglomerados. Las partículas pequeñas con formas casi esféricas y la inexistencia de aglomerados son factores que definidamente ayudan a la suspensión a comportarse mejor en los procesos de filtración, pues la permeabilidad de un queque depende de la forma del grano, la cual puede ser diferente aún para muestras que tengan granulométricas idénticas (J. P. M. Syvitski, Principle, methods, and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge, 2007). Figures 10A and 10B show the SEM analysis of the control Mg sample from SE secondary electrons, to better analyze the crystalline morphology. Figure 9A shows the homogeneous distribution of these crystals of the control Mg product, and as can be seen, these crystals have a not very wide range of sizes, with good uniformity, since, as can be seen, the difference between the sizes is not very big. Image 10B shows a very important aspect, the smaller crystals have a quasi-spherical shape, which could be beneficial for the washing process. Another important observation is that Mg C ontroi does not show a considerable presence of agglomerates. Small particles with almost spherical shapes and the absence of agglomerates are factors that definitely help the suspension to behave better in filtration processes, since the permeability of a cake depends on the shape of the grain, which can be different even for samples that have identical granulometrics (JPM Syvitski, Principle, methods, and application of particle size analysis. Cambridge, 2007).

En las Figuras 1 1 A y 11 B, se observa el análisis SEM por SE para la muestra Mgcomparativa. En las Figuras 12A y 12B, se observa el análisis SEM por SE para la muestra Mginvento- En la Figura 12A se puede observar la diferencia de tamaño de cristales, que al igual que en la Figura 1 1 A correspondiente a la muestra Mgcomparativa presenta una desuniformidad en la distribución de tamaños. Por otro lado, observando la Figura 12B, se observa que los cristales más pequeños presentan formas poligonales irregulares, esto es observado tanto para Mg invento y Mgcomparativa- También podemos apreciar la existencia de aglomerados para Mginvento, en menor proporción que Mgcomparativa- Las formas pequeñas irregulares y la presencia de aglomerados en la muestra Mginvento , pueden afectar el desempeño de la filtración y lavado de los cristales. Con estas observaciones, se valida el efecto de las impurezas, que en cuanto mayor sea la cantidad de las impurezas, el tamaño de cristal es mayor, pero involucran la existencia de aglomerados. In Figures 1 1 A and 11 B, the SEM analysis by SE for the comparative Mg sample is observed. Figures 12A and 12B show the SEM analysis by SE for the Mg invention sample - Figure 12A shows the difference in crystal size, which, as in Figure 1 1 A corresponding to the comparative Mg sample It presents a non-uniformity in the distribution of sizes. On the other hand, observing Figure 12B, it is observed that the smallest crystals have irregular polygonal shapes, this is observed both for Mg invention and Mgcomparativa- We can also appreciate the existence of agglomerates for Mg invention , in less proportion than Mgcomparative- The shapes small irregularities and the presence of agglomerates in the sample Mg invention , can affect the performance of the filtration and washing of the crystals. With these observations, the effect of the impurities is validated, that the greater the amount of impurities, the larger the crystal size, but they involve the existence of agglomerates.

A diferencia de la muestra Mgcontrol que no presenta aglomerados, la presencia de estos en las muestras Mginventivo y Mgcomparativa se atribuye a las impurezas de las bischofitas utilizadas, ya que tanto la esfera de hidratación de los iones K+ y B(OH)4 _ son diferentes a los del ion Na+, que al absorberse en la superficie cristalina favoreció más la formación de aglomerados como también un crecimiento cristalino mayor. Además, la presencia en mayores cantidades de los iones Na+ y Cl’ provenientes de las impurezas de las bischofitas ayuda a la generación de aglomerados. Efecto del tamaño de cristal y forma sobre la filtración y pureza. Unlike the control Mg sample that does not present agglomerates, the presence of these in the inventive Mg and comparative Mg samples is attributed to the impurities of the bischophytes used, since both the hydration sphere of the K + and B(OH) ions ) 4 _ are different from those of the Na + ion, which adsorbing on the crystalline surface further favored agglomerate formation as well as increased crystalline growth. In addition, the presence in greater quantities of Na + and Cl' ions from the impurities of the bischophytes helps the generation of agglomerates. Effect of crystal size and shape on filtration and purity.

El progreso del lavado se controló mediante la medición de la conductividad del filtrado. Las etapas de lavado fueron realizadas hasta reducir la conductividad del filtrado al valor mínimo posible. Como el Mg(OH)2 es un producto de muy baja solubilidad, se consideró controlar la conductividad del filtrado como un parámetro de purificación, ya que la conductividad está íntimamente relacionada con la presencia de iones en la solución; es decir, mientras mayor sea la conductividad del filtrado, existe presencia de impurezas impregnadas en la masa cristalina. A medida que la conductividad del filtrado se va reduciendo, la presencia de impurezas impregnadas en los cristales de Mg(OH)2 se reduce. También se controló el tiempo de filtrado para cada muestra de Mg(OH)2, para evaluar el efecto que tuvo la distribución granulométrica, la forma y la presencia de aglomerados sobre el rendimiento del lavado. The progress of the washing was monitored by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate. The washing stages were carried out until the conductivity of the filtrate was reduced to the minimum possible value. Since Mg(OH) 2 is a product with very low solubility, it was considered to control the conductivity of the filtrate as a purification parameter, since conductivity is closely related to the presence of ions in the solution; that is, the higher the conductivity of the filtrate, the presence of impurities impregnated in the crystalline mass. As the conductivity of the filtrate decreases, the presence of impurities impregnated in the Mg(OH) 2 crystals decreases. The filtration time for each Mg(OH) 2 sample was also controlled to evaluate the effect of the granulometric distribution, the shape and the presence of agglomerates on the washing performance.

Para cada una de los Mg(OH)2 producidos se empleó un tiempo de envejecimiento de tres horas. La etapa de envejecimiento de cristales se realizó luego de terminar el tiempo de residencia de 3 horas, establecido en la Tabla 7. En estas condiciones, el Mg(OH)2 al encontrarse en una solución de NaCI con una alta concentración, su solubilidad se ve incrementada debido al efecto del incremento de la fuerza iónica en la solución. La solubilidad del Mg(OH)2 en agua destilada es de 1 ,12 x 10-4M, sin embargo, en presencia de una elevada concentración de NaCI en solución, la solubilidad incrementó a 3,36 x 10’4M. Este hecho fue muy beneficioso para el proceso de envejecimiento cristalino, ya que, al incrementarse la solubilidad, los cristales más pequeños de Mg(OH)2 formados se disuelven y se reincorporan en la superficie de los cristales de mayor tamaño (F. G. Freixedas, A. C. Bauzá, and O. Sohnel, Cristalización en Disoluciones- Conceptos Básicos. Barcelona-España: Editorial Reverteré, 2000). Mediante el envejecimiento se logra obtener cristales más grandes, más estables y con menos aglomerados. For each of the Mg(OH) 2 produced, an aging time of three hours was used. The crystal aging stage was carried out after finishing the residence time of 3 hours, established in Table 7. Under these conditions, when Mg(OH) 2 is found in a NaCl solution with a high concentration, its solubility is is increased due to the effect of increasing ionic strength in the solution. The solubility of Mg(OH) 2 in distilled water is 1.12 x 10 -4 M, however, in the presence of a high concentration of NaCl in solution, the solubility increased to 3.36 x 10' 4 M. This This fact was very beneficial for the crystalline aging process, since, as solubility increases, the smaller Mg(OH) 2 crystals formed dissolve and are reincorporated on the surface of the larger crystals (FG Freixedas, AC Bauzá , and O. Sohnel, Crystallization in Solutions- Basic Concepts, Barcelona-Spain: Editorial Reverteré, 2000). By aging it is possible to obtain larger, more stable crystals with fewer agglomerates.

Como se observa en la Figura 13, la conductividad del filtrado de la muestra Mginventivo es la más alta, con un valor de 228 [mS/cm], esto se debe a la mayor presencia de iones como impurezas en la bischofita de descarte industrial utilizada. El filtrado de la muestra Mgcomparativo tiene una conductividad inicial de 217,7 [mS/cm], 4,5% menos que el filtrado de Mginvento; esto se debe a la pureza de la bischofita purificada que se utilizó para sintetizar este producto. Finalmente, la conductividad inicial del filtrado de la muestra Mgcontrol es la de menor valor entre las tres, con 209,4 [mS/cm], 8,5% menor al filtrado de la muestra Mginvento; en este caso la conductividad para el filtrado Mgcontrol solo se debe a la presencia de los iones Na+ y Cl- en solución. Respecto a la variación de conductividad del filtrado según cada etapa de lavado, se puede observar que hasta la etapa 2 de lavado, la conductividad se reduce de manera lineal para las muestras Mginvento, Mgcomparativo y Mgcontrol, con porcentajes de reducción de 80, 84,2 y 84,6% respectivamente. A partir de este punto la tasa de reducción de conductividad varia tomando otra tendencia. Como se puede ver en la Figura 13, el lavado para la muestra Mgcontrol fue el que tuvo mayor rendimiento, ya que para reducir la conductividad al menor valor constate, solo se requirió de 7 etapas de lavado. Además, la conductividad para el filtrado de Mgcontrol fue la mínima alcanzada entre las tres muestras. Por otro lado, para las muestras Mginvento y Mgcomparativo, fue necesario realizar 10 etapas de lavado hasta alcanzar una conductividad mínima y constante, cercanas al de la muestra Mgcontrol. La conductividad final del filtrado Mgcontrol fue en promedio 61 % menor que las conductividades finales de Mginventivo y Mgcomparativo- Esta variación puede explicarse debido al efecto que tuvieron la presencia de aglomerados en las muestras Mg invento y Mgcomparativo que, a pesar de tener cristales de mayor tamaño, la presencia de aglomerados hizo que la masa cristalina retuviera mayor cantidad de solución, esto explica la variación de pureza obtenida en cada muestra. El efecto de los aglomerados también es notable en los valores de las curvas Mg invento y Mgcomparativo, ya que cada una tiene valores superiores a los de la curva Mgcontrol. El tiempo que tomó realizar el filtrado para cada muestra y el porcentaje de agua retenido se presenta en la Tabla 15. As observed in Figure 13, the conductivity of the filtrate of the inventive Mg sample is the highest, with a value of 228 [mS/cm], this is due to the greater presence of ions as impurities in the industrial waste bischofite. used. The comparative Mg sample filtrate has an initial conductivity of 217.7 [mS/cm], 4.5% less than the Mg filtrate of the invention ; this is due to the purity of the purified bischofite that was used to synthesize this product. Finally, the initial conductivity of the filtrate of the Mg control sample is the lowest value among the three, with 209.4 [mS/cm], 8.5% lower than the filtrate of the Mg invention sample; in this case the conductivity for the control Mg filtrate is only due to the presence of Na + and Cl- ions in solution. Regarding the variation of conductivity of the filtrate according to each washing stage, it can be observed that up to stage 2 of washing, the conductivity is reduced linearly for the samples Mg invention , Mg comparative and Mg control , with reduction percentages of 80 , 84.2 and 84.6% respectively. From this point the rate of conductivity reduction varies taking another trend. How I know can be seen in Figure 13, the washing for the Mg control sample had the highest yield, since to reduce the conductivity to the lowest constant value, only 7 washing stages were required. In addition, the conductivity for the control Mg filtrate was the lowest achieved among the three samples. On the other hand, for the Mg invention and comparative Mg samples, it was necessary to carry out 10 washing stages until reaching a minimum and constant conductivity, close to that of the control Mg sample. The final conductivity of the control Mg filtrate was on average 61 % lower than the final conductivities of inventive Mg and comparative Mg - This variation can be explained due to the effect of the presence of agglomerates in the Mg invention and comparative Mg samples that, despite Having larger crystals, the presence of agglomerates made the crystalline mass retain a greater amount of solution, this explains the variation in purity obtained in each sample. The effect of the agglomerates is also notable in the values of the Mg invention and comparative Mg curves, since each one has values higher than those of the control Mg curve. The time it took to filter for each sample and the percentage of water retained are presented in Table 15.

Tabla 15. Tiempo de filtrado y porcentaje de agua retenida para las muestras de Mg(OH)2.

Figure imgf000021_0001
Table 15. Filtration time and percentage of water retained for the Mg(OH) 2 samples.
Figure imgf000021_0001

Como se observa en la Tabla 15, el tiempo de filtrado fue más rápido para Minvento que para Mgcomparativa- Esta variación en los tiempos de filtrado se debe en gran medida a la presencia de aglomerados. Tal como se observa en la Figura 1 1 B, la muestra Mgcomparativa presenta mayor cantidad de aglomerados, lo cual evidentemente repercute en el tiempo de filtrado. As seen in Table 15, the filtration time was faster for M invention than for Mgcomparative. This variation in filtration times is largely due to the presence of agglomerates. As can be seen in Figure 1 1 B, the comparative Mg sample presents a greater amount of agglomerates, which obviously affects the filtering time.

A pesar de que la muestra Mgcontrol contiene los cristales más pequeños, su distribución granulométrica uniforme, la ausencia de aglomerados y la forma casi esférica de las partículas más pequeñas permitieron que el filtrado sea realizado en 1 ,6 horas y además reteniendo la menor cantidad de agua en el queque, lográndose obtener un producto de Mg(OH)2 de 99,88% de pureza. Despite the fact that the Mg control sample contains the smallest crystals, its uniform granulometric distribution, the absence of agglomerates and the almost spherical shape of the smallest particles allowed the filtration to be carried out in 1.6 hours and also retaining the least amount. of water in the cake, obtaining a 99.88% pure Mg(OH) 2 product.

La Tabla 15 también muestra los valores para el porcentaje de agua retenido para cada muestra, este valor fue obtenido pesando la pulpa de Mg(OH)2 húmeda luego del filtrado y el peso del Mg(OH)2 completamente seco. Si bien la muestra Minvento presenta menor retención de agua que la muestra Mgcomparativa, los valores del porcentaje de retención en ambas muestras son muy cercanos. Table 15 also shows the values for the percentage of water retained for each sample, this value was obtained by weighing the wet Mg(OH) 2 pulp after filtering and the weight of the completely dry Mg(OH) 2 . Although the sample M invention presents less water retention than the comparative Mg sample, the values of the retention percentage in both samples are very close.

A pesar de que ambas muestras contenían aglomerados, la muestra Mg invento tuvo un mejor comportamiento y alcanzó una mayor pureza de producto con respecto a Mgcomparativa. Esta variación ventajosa en la muestra Mginvento se debe principalmente a la mayor cantidad de aglomerados presentes en la muestra Mgcomparativa. Sin embargo, un factor que también contribuye para alcanzar una pureza mayor en Mginventiva es el tamaño de cristal mayor que se logra en esta muestra. Pues como se muestra en la Tabla 9, los cristales de Mginvento son 4,2% más grandes que los de Mgcomparativa, esta pequeña diferencia influyó significativamente en el comportamiento de la pulpa Mginvento, debido a la presencia de partículas de tamaño mayor, existiendo menor fuerza aditivita de las soluciones sobre la matriz del cristal, provocando que el porcentaje de H2O retenida sea menor. Debido a todos estos factores, el producto de Mg(OH)2 de la muestra Mginvento es de mayor pureza que Mgcomparativa. Despite the fact that both samples contained agglomerates, the Mg invention sample performed better and achieved a higher product purity with respect to comparative Mg. This Advantageous variation in the invention Mg sample is mainly due to the higher amount of agglomerates present in the comparative Mg sample. However, a factor that also contributes to achieving a higher purity in inventive Mg is the larger crystal size that is achieved in this sample. Since, as shown in Table 9, the Mg invention crystals are 4.2% larger than those of comparative Mg, this small difference significantly influenced the behavior of the Mg invention pulp, due to the presence of larger particles. , there being less additive force of the solutions on the crystal matrix, causing the percentage of retained H 2 O to be lower. Due to all these factors, the Mg(OH) 2 product of the invention Mg sample is of higher purity than comparative Mg.

Claims

REIVINDICACIONES 1 - Método efectivo para obtener hidróxido de magnesio Mg(OH)2 con una pureza elevada del 99,7% a partir de bischofita de descarte, caracterizado porque comprende los siguientes pasos: a) preparación de los reactivos que consiste en disolver bischofita de descarte en agua formando una disolución con una concentración de 36 a 37% en peso de bischofita; y paralelamente preparar una solución alcalina de NaOH en agua, formando una disolución de 23 a 24% en peso de NaOH, en donde la bischofita de descarte contiene la siguiente composición porcentual: 88,08 % d 1 - Effective method to obtain magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH) 2 with a high purity of 99.7% from discarded bischofite, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: a) preparation of the reagents that consists of dissolving discarded bischofite in water forming a solution with a concentration of 36 to 37% by weight of bischofite; and in parallel prepare an alkaline solution of NaOH in water, forming a solution of 23 to 24% by weight of NaOH, where the discarded bischofite contains the following percentage composition: 88.08% d 1 ,53 % de
Figure imgf000023_0001
1.53% of
Figure imgf000023_0001
3,20 % de NaCI 3.20% NaCI 0,89 % de KCI 0.89% KCI 0,12 % de CaSO4 0.12% CaSO 4 0,46 % de K2SO4 0.46% of K 2 SO 4 2,13 % de H3BO3 b) alimentación de los reactivos preparados en a) al reactor para conducir una cristalización reactiva para la formación de Mg(OH)2, controlando la sobresaturación por cambio de pH, y empleando una solución de NaCI con una concentración de 12 a 13% en peso, en donde la proporción en volumen de NaCI/MgCI2 es igual a 0,45, la solución de NaCI se encuentra dentro del reactor de formación del Mg(OH)2 antes del ingreso de los reactivos preparados en a); y la alimentación de los reactivos se realiza a un flujo bajo de2.13% H3BO3 b) feeding the reagents prepared in a) to the reactor to conduct a reactive crystallization for the formation of Mg(OH) 2 , controlling the supersaturation by changing the pH, and using a NaCl solution with a concentration from 12 to 13% by weight, where the volume ratio of NaCI/MgCI 2 is equal to 0.45, the NaCI solution is inside the Mg(OH) 2 formation reactor before entering the prepared reagents in a); and the feeding of the reagents is carried out at a low flow of 4.5 y 11 ,25 ml/min (0,33 y 0,82 volumen de reactor/h), de álcali y bischofita, respectivamente; c) separar de la solución obtenida en b), sólido y líquido, mediante filtración; d) lavado de la pulpa de Mg(OH)2 obtenida en c) con agua fresca; e) secado del Mg(OH)2 obtenido en d) . 4.5 and 11.25 ml/min (0.33 and 0.82 reactor volume/h), of alkali and bischofite, respectively; c) separating solid and liquid from the solution obtained in b), by means of filtration; d) washing the Mg(OH) 2 pulp obtained in c) with fresh water; e) drying of the Mg(OH) 2 obtained in d).
2. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso a) la pureza del NaOH es del 99 %. 2. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step a) the purity of NaOH is 99%. 3. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso b) los reactivos son alimentados al reactor de manera simultánea. 3. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step b) the reactants are fed to the reactor simultaneously. 4. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso b) la alimentación de la solución de NaOH se mantiene hasta alcanzar un pH de 12 o punto isoeléctrico del Mg(OH)2 dentro del reactor. 4. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step b) the feeding of the NaOH solution is maintained until reaching a pH of 12 or the isoelectric point of Mg(OH) 2 inside the reactor. 5. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso b) la temperatura del reactor se mantiene a 80 °C y bajo agitación constante, para un tiempo de reacción de5. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step b) the reactor temperature is maintained at 80 °C and under constant stirring, for a reaction time of 2.5 a 3 horas. 2.5 to 3 hours. 6. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque además comprende antes del paso c), prolongar el tiempo de envejecimiento de los cristales de Mg(OH)2 después de concluida la reacción dentro del reactor, para reducir la generación de agregados. 6. The method of claim 1, characterized in that it also comprises, before step c), prolonging the aging time of the Mg(OH) 2 crystals after the reaction within the reactor has concluded, to reduce the generation of aggregates. 7. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque el paso c) de filtración se realiza en un filtro prensa. 7. The method of claim 1 characterized in that step c) filtration is carried out in a filter press. 8. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque además comprende después del paso c), recircular al reactor la solución de NaCI reacondicionada. 8. The method of claim 1 characterized in that it further comprises after step c), recirculating the reconditioned NaCl solution to the reactor. 9. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso d) se controla la presencia de iones disueltos mediante la medición de la conductividad del filtrado hasta valores mínimos constantes de conductividad en el rango de 450 a 600 pS/cm. 9. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step d) the presence of dissolved ions is controlled by measuring the conductivity of the filtrate up to constant minimum values of conductivity in the range of 450 to 600 pS/cm. 10. El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque en el paso e) el secado del Mg(OH)2 se realiza a 80 °C. 10. The method of claim 1 characterized in that in step e) the drying of Mg(OH) 2 is carried out at 80 °C. 1 1 . El método de la reivindicación 1 caracterizado porque el paso e) de secado se realiza en un horno de secado. eleven . The method of claim 1 characterized in that step e) of drying is carried out in a drying oven.
PCT/CL2021/050131 2021-10-29 2021-12-30 Method for producing high-purity mg(oh)2 from industrial discard bischofite Ceased WO2023070234A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CL2869-2021 2021-10-29
CL2021002869A CL2021002869A1 (en) 2021-10-29 2021-10-29 Production method of high purity mg(oh)2 from industrial waste bischofite.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023070234A1 true WO2023070234A1 (en) 2023-05-04

Family

ID=80444798

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CL2021/050131 Ceased WO2023070234A1 (en) 2021-10-29 2021-12-30 Method for producing high-purity mg(oh)2 from industrial discard bischofite

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CL (1) CL2021002869A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2023070234A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117383908A (en) * 2023-10-13 2024-01-12 华东理工大学 A method for preparing magnesium spinel zirconium material using salt lake hydroclase

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101700899A (en) * 2009-10-28 2010-05-05 钟辉 Technology for producing and preparing high-purity lamellar magnesium hydroxide
RU2422364C2 (en) * 2009-08-04 2011-06-27 Закрытое акционерное общество "НикоМаг" Method of producing micro- and/or nanometric magnesium hydroxide
CN103626210A (en) * 2013-12-13 2014-03-12 华东理工大学 Method for preparing magnesium hydroxide and chlorine by coupling magnesium chloride reactive crystallization and electrolysis

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2422364C2 (en) * 2009-08-04 2011-06-27 Закрытое акционерное общество "НикоМаг" Method of producing micro- and/or nanometric magnesium hydroxide
CN101700899A (en) * 2009-10-28 2010-05-05 钟辉 Technology for producing and preparing high-purity lamellar magnesium hydroxide
CN103626210A (en) * 2013-12-13 2014-03-12 华东理工大学 Method for preparing magnesium hydroxide and chlorine by coupling magnesium chloride reactive crystallization and electrolysis

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
LIU, W. ET AL.: "Improved Lime Method to Prepare High-Purity Magnesium Hydroxide and Light Magnesia from Bischofite", JOM, vol. 71, no. 12, 2019, XP036933505, DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s11837-019-03602-9. *
SONG XINGFU ET AL: "Synthesis and characterization of magnesium hydroxide by batch reaction crystallization", FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS, HEIDELBERG, vol. 5, no. 4, 1 December 2011 (2011-12-01), Heidelberg , pages 416 - 421, XP093067306, ISSN: 2095-0179, DOI: 10.1007/s11705-011-1125-9 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117383908A (en) * 2023-10-13 2024-01-12 华东理工大学 A method for preparing magnesium spinel zirconium material using salt lake hydroclase

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CL2021002869A1 (en) 2022-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Liu et al. Process analysis and study of factors affecting the lithium carbonate crystallization from sulfate media during lithium extraction
Chitrakar et al. Lithium recovery from salt lake brine by H 2 TiO 3
Zhou et al. Highly efficient preparation of crystalline yttrium carbonate in sodium carbonate system: Formation and growth mechanism
Liu et al. Production of battery grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate using barium hydroxide causticizing agent
ES2950589A2 (en) METHOD OF RECYCLING AND USE OF LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE (LFP) WASTE
CN101234769A (en) Process for preparing high-purity ultra-fine magnesium hydroxide by sodium hydroxide method
JP7602275B2 (en) Process and method for purifying lithium carbonate starting from an impure lithium chloride solution
Yuan et al. Effects of temperature on conversion of Li2CO3 to LiOH in Ca (OH) 2 suspension
WO2022147632A1 (en) Method for the production of lithium hydroxide (lioh) directly from lithium chloride (lici), without the need for an intermediate production of lithium carbonate or similar
Bao et al. Semi-wet synthesis of high-performance Li1. 6Mn1. 6O4 for selective lithium extraction from Salt Lakes Brine
WO2023070234A1 (en) Method for producing high-purity mg(oh)2 from industrial discard bischofite
Shin et al. Recovery of lithium from LiAlO2 in waste box sagger through sulfation to produce Li2SO4 and sequential wet conversion to Li3PO4, LiCl and Li2CO3
Zhang et al. Process monitoring of cobalt carbonate precipitation by reactions between cobalt sulfate and sodium carbonate solutions to control product morphology and purity
Chen et al. Manganese-based lithium-ion sieve prepared by chelation with aluminum sec-butoxide for an extremely low manganese dissolution rate and extended service life
KR101985962B1 (en) Mehtod of preparing lithium chloride
US3852427A (en) Sodium bicarbonate spherulites from sodium d esquicarbonate
JP2675465B2 (en) Hydrous calcium carbonate and method for producing the same
JP3505132B2 (en) Manganese oxide and its production method
CN104803400A (en) Ammonium magnesium sulfate preparation method
Yu et al. Hierarchically nanostructured shuttle-like aragonite mesocrystals: Preparation, characterization, growth mechanism, and removal ability to La (III)
RU2089500C1 (en) Method of producing the crystalline lithium aluminate
CN107500258A (en) A kind of preparation method of the long rod of high-carbon quantity hydroxyapatite nano
WO2023018358A1 (en) High-purity magnesium oxide and process for producing same
Song et al. High-Efficiency Lithium-Ion Sieves Synthesized via Hydrothermal-Roasting Method
CN101783404A (en) Method for preparing lithium iron phosphate polycrystalline powder

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21961629

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21961629

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1