WO2023047342A1 - System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data - Google Patents
System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2023047342A1 WO2023047342A1 PCT/IB2022/059003 IB2022059003W WO2023047342A1 WO 2023047342 A1 WO2023047342 A1 WO 2023047342A1 IB 2022059003 W IB2022059003 W IB 2022059003W WO 2023047342 A1 WO2023047342 A1 WO 2023047342A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- insar
- record
- temporal
- location
- locations
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/89—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
- G01S13/90—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging using synthetic aperture techniques, e.g. synthetic aperture radar [SAR] techniques
- G01S13/9021—SAR image post-processing techniques
- G01S13/9023—SAR image post-processing techniques combined with interferometric techniques
Definitions
- the disclosed embodiments relate generally to techniques for monitoring changes in subsurface reservoirs using satellite data and, in particular, to a method of improving the resolution of the satellite data in order to localize near-surface overburden effects and identify effects of changes in the subsurface reservoir.
- Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data is obtained from two or more remote sensing satellites that transmit pulses of microwave energy towards the Earth’s surface and record the amount of backscattered energy.
- InSAR data is typically used to identify surface deformation, which may be caused by near-surface overburden effects and/or changes deeper in the subsurface.
- a method of reservoir monitoring including receiving multiple temporal InSAR datasets recorded at different times over the reservoir region, setting a location of a virtual source x A , setting a location x B , crosscorrelating a temporal InSAR record from the virtual source x A with a temporal InSAR record from the location x B , summing the cross-correlation results over a temporal index to produce a processed InSAR record, storing the processed InSAR record to a processed InSAR dataset at x fi ; and setting another location x B and repeating the cross-correlating, summing, and storing steps is disclosed.
- some embodiments provide a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing one or more programs.
- the one or more programs comprise instructions, which when executed by a computer system with one or more processors and memory, cause the computer system to perform any of the methods provided herein.
- some embodiments provide a computer system.
- the computer system includes one or more processors, memory, and one or more programs.
- the one or more programs are stored in memory and configured to be executed by the one or more processors.
- the one or more programs include an operating system and instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the computer system to perform any of the methods provided herein.
- Figure 1 illustrates simplified examples of changes in the earth’s subsurface and how they may be recorded
- Figure 2 illustrates a flowchart of a method of reservoir monitoring, in accordance with some embodiments
- Figure 4 shows the temporal snapshots of the spatial Z-component displacement recorded at the surface for the synthetic in Figure 3;
- Figure 5 shows the recorded displacements at nine locations for Figure 3;
- Figure 6 shows results of the present invention with virtual sources marked by the white asterisks
- Figure 7 shows field data spatial snapshots of the InSAR data taken at nine different time-lapse observations
- Figure 8 shows the field data InSAR time-series at nine different locations
- Figure 9 shows results of the present invention with virtual sources marked by the black asterisks.
- Figure 10 is a block diagram illustrating a reservoir monitoring system, in accordance with some embodiments.
- Described below are methods, systems, and computer readable storage media that provide a manner of reservoir monitoring. These embodiments are designed to be of particular use for reservoir monitoring of hydrocarbon reservoirs and reservoir formations used for carbon sequestration. These embodiments apply principles of Green's function interferometry (GFI) to InSAR data measurements in order to improve the resolution. The application of this methodology produces localization of the near-surface overburden effects and enhancement of InSAR signal from the reservoir changes.
- GFI Green's function interferometry
- the present invention includes embodiments of a method and system for reservoir monitoring using InSAR data.
- InSAR data provides a measurement of the Earth’s surface displacements that can be used for monitoring reservoir stresses, fluid pressure and volume changes.
- the InSAR measurements may suffer from poor resolution.
- the present invention employs a Green’s function interferometry (GFI) approach that uses time-lapse InSAR data.
- GFI Green’s function interferometry
- the present invention derives the equations and computes the sensitivity between InSAR displacements caused by the reservoir changes with an observation point (i.e., virtual source) at the surface, as illustrated in Figure 1 panel B.
- the present invention improves resolution of the GFI-InSAR measurements that further can be used for subsurface imaging and continuous reservoir monitoring with applications to development of subsurface reservoirs, production from subsurface reservoirs, and subsurface integrity.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a method 100 for reservoir monitoring.
- InSAR datasets recorded at different times at least one day apart time-lapse datasets
- a virtual source location is set at one of the locations of data observations.
- a spatial location is set at the same or another location of data observations.
- each temporal InSAR record from the virtual source location is zero-lag cross-correlated with the contemporaneous InSAR record for the spatial location.
- the cross-correlation results are summed for across the temporal datasets and normalized by the number of time-lapse datasets. This creates a Green’s function response (GFR) for the spatial location, which is stored at operation 15.
- GFR Green’s function response
- next spatial location for which the method will generate the GFR is set at operation 16 and operations 13, 14, and 15 are repeated until all spatial locations that need GFRs.
- operation 17 a decision is made about whether another virtual source location is needed. For sensitivity analysis, meaning this is an investigation to see if time-lapse changes are visible in the time-lapse datasets, one virtual source is enough so method 100 would end. However, if the goal is to localize the changes in the subsurface, particularly at different depths in the subsurface, more virtual sources would be needed. If the answer to operation 17 is yes, then operation 18 sets the next virtual source location and method 100 repeats from operation 12. These results may then be displayed to allow identification of near-surface and reservoir-depth changes.
- GFI-InSAR is based on cross-correlating each time-lapse InSAR series from each location with its neighboring locations and then summing over the observation points.
- the mathematical description is:
- u obs are the observed displacements at the surface locations x A and x B , G is the Green’s function, and S is the source signature.
- the input to spatial average ensemble ( ⁇ ) is from subsurface locations at different monitoring times.
- time-lapse information i.e., number of the timelapse events correspond to the subsurface spatial locations.
- the locations of the subsurface sources within each cluster are drawn stochastically from a uniform distribution.
- the maximum source magnitudes of the near-surface overburden and the deep reservoir are 10 5 and 10 6 , respectively, with the same time-dependent diffusivity of 10 -5 m 2 /s.
- both source magnitudes were scaled with noise generated from uniform distribution between zero and unity.
- the two sources are mutually uncorrelated in time and space.
- FIG. 4 shows the temporal snapshots of the spatial Z-component displacement recorded at the surface.
- Fig. 5 we show the displacements at nine locations that will be used for GFR.
- the early times correspond to the signal from the near-surface overburden and that at the latter times corresponds to the deep part.
- Fig. 6 we present results of the GFR with virtual sources marked by the white asterisks. In these results, we observe the ability of GFR to localize the signals coming from the near-surface overburden and the deep reservoir by placing the virtual source at different locations.
- the virtual sources located at the vicinity of (x 1 , y t ) localize the near-surface overburden signal with the largest magnitude.
- the magnitude of the near-surface overburden signal decreases (e.g., see the GFRs from the first column in Fig. 6) until the signal from the deep reservoir is localized (e.g., the GFRs from the third row in Fig. 6), with its largest magnitude at (x 2 ,y 2 ).
- the magnitudes of each GFR in Fig. 6 are auto-scaled to present large-scale magnitude variability with respect to the virtual source locations. This localization property of the GFR allows us to spatially separate the near-surface overburden and the deep reservoir signals.
- the GFR data have higher spatial variability and sensitivity than the original data in Fig. 7. This is because of the localization of the signal around the location of the virtual source.
- the amplitudes of each GFR refer to the displacement sensitivity to the virtual source location. It is worth noting that when the virtual sources are located inside the area with high variability (for x between 1 and 3 km and for y between 0 and 2.5 km), the GFR-InSAR exhibits a similar spatial response as the original input time-lapse InSAR data than when the virtual sources are outside of this area.
- we attribute the virtual sources inside the high variability area to the responses from the near- surface overburden, whereas those outside of this area are attributed to the responses from the deeper reservoir depths.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a reservoir monitoring system 200, in accordance with some embodiments.
- the system 200 may include one or more of a processor 21, an interface 22 (e.g., bus, wireless interface), an electronic storage 23, a graphical display 24, and/or other components.
- the electronic storage 23 may be configured to include electronic storage medium that electronically stores information.
- the electronic storage 23 may store software algorithms, information determined by the processor 21, information received remotely, and/or other information that enables the system 200 to function properly.
- the electronic storage 23 may store information relating to InSAR data, and/or other information.
- the electronic storage media of the electronic storage 23 may be provided integrally (i.e., substantially non-removable) with one or more components of the system 200 and/or as removable storage that is connectable to one or more components of the system 200 via, for example, a port (e.g., a USB port, a Firewire port, etc.) or a drive (e.g., a disk drive, etc.).
- the electronic storage 23 may include one or more of optically readable storage media (e.g., optical disks, etc.), magnetically readable storage media (e.g., magnetic tape, magnetic hard drive, floppy drive, etc.), electrical charge-based storage media (e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, RAM, etc.), solid-state storage media (e.g., flash drive, etc.), and/or other electronically readable storage media.
- the electronic storage 23 may be a separate component within the system 200, or the electronic storage 23 may be provided integrally with one or more other components of the system 200 (e.g., the processor 21).
- the electronic storage 23 is shown in FIG. 2 as a single entity, this is for illustrative purposes only.
- the electronic storage 23 may comprise a plurality of storage units. These storage units may be physically located within the same device, or the electronic storage 23 may represent storage functionality of a plurality of devices operating in coordination.
- the graphical display 24 may refer to an electronic device that provides visual presentation of information.
- the graphical display 24 may include a color display and/or a non-color display.
- the graphical display 24 may be configured to visually present information.
- the graphical display 24 may present information using/within one or more graphical user interfaces. For example, the graphical display 24 may present information relating to the InSAR data, the processed InSAR data, and/or other information.
- the processor 21 may be configured to provide information processing capabilities in the system 200.
- the processor 21 may comprise one or more of a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, a microcontroller, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information.
- the processor 21 may be configured to execute one or more machine-readable instructions 210 to facilitate reservoir monitoring.
- the machine-readable instructions 210 may include one or more computer program components.
- the machine- readable instructions 210 may include a cross-correlation component 212 and a summation component 214, and/or other computer program components.
- computer program components are illustrated in Figure 2 as being co-located within a single processing unit, one or more of computer program components may be located remotely from the other computer program components. While computer program components are described as performing or being configured to perform operations, computer program components may comprise instructions which may program processor 21 and/or system 200 to perform the operation.
- While computer program components are described herein as being implemented via processor 21 through machine-readable instructions 210, this is merely for ease of reference and is not meant to be limiting. In some implementations, one or more functions of computer program components described herein may be implemented via hardware (e.g., dedicated chip, field-programmable gate array) rather than software. One or more functions of computer program components described herein may be software- implemented, hardware-implemented, or software and hardware-implemented.
- the cross-correlation component 212 may be configured to cross correlate each temporal InSAR record from each location with its neighboring locations.
- the summation component 214 may be configured to sum the cross-correlations over the observation points (i.e., each location).
- the present invention obtains the GFI-InSAR data with higher resolution than the original InSAR data, which can be further used for low- frequency imaging such as reverse time migration.
- processor 21 may be configured to execute one or more additional computer program components that may perform some or all of the functionality attributed to one or more of computer program components described herein.
- the phrase “if it is determined [that a stated condition precedent is true]” or “if [a stated condition precedent is true]” or “when [a stated condition precedent is true]” may be construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “in accordance with a determination” or “upon detecting” or “in response to detecting” that the stated condition precedent is true, depending on the context.
- stages that are not order dependent may be reordered and other stages may be combined or broken out. While some reordering or other groupings are specifically mentioned, others will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art and so do not present an exhaustive list of alternatives. Moreover, it should be recognized that the stages could be implemented in hardware, firmware, software or any combination thereof.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP22786474.1A EP4405714A1 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2022-09-23 | System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data |
| AU2022351700A AU2022351700A1 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2022-09-23 | System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data |
| CA3230673A CA3230673A1 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2022-09-23 | System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US202163248131P | 2021-09-24 | 2021-09-24 | |
| US63/248,131 | 2021-09-24 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2023047342A1 true WO2023047342A1 (en) | 2023-03-30 |
Family
ID=83688974
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2022/059003 Ceased WO2023047342A1 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2022-09-23 | System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP4405714A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2022351700A1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA3230673A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2023047342A1 (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20160377751A1 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2016-12-29 | Cgg Services Sa | Systems and methods for identifying s-wave refractions utilizing supervirtual refraction interferometry |
| WO2021009904A1 (en) * | 2019-07-18 | 2021-01-21 | 日本電気株式会社 | Image processing device and image processing method |
-
2022
- 2022-09-23 CA CA3230673A patent/CA3230673A1/en active Pending
- 2022-09-23 WO PCT/IB2022/059003 patent/WO2023047342A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2022-09-23 AU AU2022351700A patent/AU2022351700A1/en active Pending
- 2022-09-23 EP EP22786474.1A patent/EP4405714A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20160377751A1 (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2016-12-29 | Cgg Services Sa | Systems and methods for identifying s-wave refractions utilizing supervirtual refraction interferometry |
| WO2021009904A1 (en) * | 2019-07-18 | 2021-01-21 | 日本電気株式会社 | Image processing device and image processing method |
| US20220268922A1 (en) * | 2019-07-18 | 2022-08-25 | Nec Corporation | Image processing device and image processing method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA3230673A1 (en) | 2023-03-30 |
| AU2022351700A1 (en) | 2024-02-29 |
| EP4405714A1 (en) | 2024-07-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Binder et al. | Modeling the seismic response of individual hydraulic fracturing stages observed in a time-lapse distributed acoustic sensing vertical seismic profiling survey | |
| RU2411544C2 (en) | Detection and determination of microseismic activities location by way of continuous map-making migration | |
| EP3029491B1 (en) | Increasing similarity between seismic datasets | |
| Ichikawa et al. | Case study of hydraulic fracture monitoring using multiwell integrated analysis based on low-frequency DAS data | |
| EP2775320B1 (en) | Image-domain 4D-binning method and system | |
| AU2011254624A2 (en) | Passive monitoring method for seismic events | |
| Share et al. | Internal structure of the San Jacinto fault zone at Blackburn Saddle from seismic data of a linear array | |
| US9804283B2 (en) | Vibro seismic source separation and acquisition | |
| CN104755962A (en) | System and method for processing 4D seismic data | |
| CN110361792A (en) | A kind of fusion of geophysical data and imaging method, medium and equipment | |
| NO20130967A1 (en) | Performing reverse time mapping of acoustic and seismic multicomponent data | |
| US20130258809A1 (en) | Method for time-lapse wave separation | |
| WO2023047342A1 (en) | System and method for monitoring subsurface reservoir changes using satellite data | |
| US20140249755A1 (en) | Method and device for calculating time-shifts and time-strains in seismic data | |
| EP3092513A2 (en) | Systems and methods for destriping seismic data | |
| An et al. | Offshore Fault Geometry Revealed from Earthquake Locations Using New State‐of‐Art Techniques: The Case of the 2022 Adriatic Sea Earthquake Sequence | |
| Ge et al. | Reverse travel time imaging of microseismic location | |
| Zhu et al. | Hydraulic fracture aperture estimation using low frequency DAS and DSS in Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford Shale | |
| Hall et al. | Effect of source effort and source distance on optical-fibre data at CaMI. FRS, Newell County, Alberta | |
| EP3259618B1 (en) | Black hole boundary conditions | |
| Mao et al. | Microseismic event location using an improved global grid search and its extended method in a downhole monitoring system | |
| US20230288588A1 (en) | System and method for seismic velocity and anisotropic parameter modeling | |
| US8301379B2 (en) | Method of interpolation between a plurality of observed tensors | |
| Dȩbski | Estimating the earthquake source time function by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling | |
| Zuo et al. | Delineation of overlapping magnetic field source boundaries with a 3-D multi-layer convolution model |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22786474 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: AU2022351700 Country of ref document: AU |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 3230673 Country of ref document: CA |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2022351700 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20220923 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2022786474 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2022786474 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20240424 |