[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2021229815A1 - Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation - Google Patents

Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021229815A1
WO2021229815A1 PCT/JP2020/019549 JP2020019549W WO2021229815A1 WO 2021229815 A1 WO2021229815 A1 WO 2021229815A1 JP 2020019549 W JP2020019549 W JP 2020019549W WO 2021229815 A1 WO2021229815 A1 WO 2021229815A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cluster
deterioration
evaluation
period
change
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2020/019549
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
智 雨宮
秀城 阿部
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fujitsu Ltd
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fujitsu Ltd filed Critical Fujitsu Ltd
Priority to PCT/JP2020/019549 priority Critical patent/WO2021229815A1/fr
Priority to JP2022522488A priority patent/JP7367866B2/ja
Publication of WO2021229815A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021229815A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00—Machine learning

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an information processing device, an evaluation method, and an evaluation program.
  • Patent Documents 1 to 3 techniques for monitoring and diagnosing abnormalities and deterioration of equipment and facilities are known (for example, Patent Documents 1 to 3).
  • the measurement data measured by the sensor includes fluctuations based on events that are not closely correlated with equipment abnormalities and deterioration, such as fluctuations in measured values due to seasonal changes. There is. Since there can be innumerable such factors, it is difficult to identify all of them and exclude them from the measurement data. Therefore, it is desired to provide a technique capable of evaluating deterioration of equipment and facilities from measurement data that can fluctuate under the influence of various factors.
  • the present invention aims to evaluate deterioration of equipment, equipment, etc. from measurement data that can fluctuate under the influence of various factors.
  • the information processing apparatus is a sparse structure model generated from the data measured during the reference window period among the time-series measurement data obtained from a plurality of sensors that measure the state of the evaluation object.
  • the change score which is based on the degree of change for each sensor of the cluster structure model generated from the data measured in the window period after the reference window period.
  • An acquisition unit that acquires a plurality of change scores, a specific unit that identifies the position of a cluster by clustering a plurality of change scores, and at least one change score obtained in at least one window period included in the evaluation target period. It includes an evaluation unit that evaluates the deterioration of the evaluation target based on the movement of the cluster position caused by adding to the cluster.
  • an object for evaluating deterioration of equipment or equipment may be referred to as an evaluation object.
  • a temperature sensor such as an optical fiber temperature sensor and a sensor such as a vibration sensor are installed in an arrangement capable of measuring the temperature and vibration of the boiler tube group.
  • the deterioration of the boiler tube group of the thermal power plant from the change of the measurement data such as the temperature and vibration of each part of the boiler tube group measured by the sensor, and estimate the remaining life.
  • the execution timing of maintenance work such as inspection, replacement, and repair can be optimized.
  • changes in the measurement data of the sensor may include information caused by factors other than deterioration of the evaluation target.
  • a sensor acquires time-series measurement data for one year.
  • the measured data may fluctuate due to, for example, differences between day and night, seasons and weather differences.
  • the evaluation object includes a plurality of operation modes such as high-speed operation, low-speed operation, and stop
  • the measurement data of the sensor may be changed by changing the operation modes.
  • the measurement data of the sensor may fluctuate due to changes in the state of peripheral equipment such as the operation and stop of the air conditioner arranged around the evaluation target.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a plurality of types of deterioration of a boiler tube.
  • the factors of deterioration, the classification of deterioration, and the contents of deterioration are associated with each other.
  • Deterioration factors of the boiler tube include creep, fatigue, corrosion / wear, and the like.
  • the classification of deterioration according to the way of occurrence of each deterioration factor is shown.
  • creep is a long-term creep in which low-speed deformation occurs under long-term stress action at high temperature, and a short-time in which rapid deformation occurs when overheated due to an obstacle in the flow of steam due to scale. It can be classified as creep.
  • the appearance of deterioration in the measurement data of the sensor may differ depending on the type of deterioration.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a block configuration of the information processing apparatus 200 according to the embodiment.
  • the information processing device 200 may be, for example, a computer such as a server computer, a personal computer (PC), a mobile PC, or a tablet terminal.
  • the information processing device 200 includes, for example, a control unit 201, a storage unit 202, and a communication unit 203.
  • the control unit 201 includes, for example, an acquisition unit 211, a specific unit 212, an evaluation unit 213, and the like, and may also include other functional units.
  • the storage unit 202 of the information processing apparatus 200 stores information such as determination information 800, which will be described later, for example.
  • the communication unit 203 may communicate with another device such as a sensor according to the instruction of the control unit 201, for example. The details of each of these units and the details of the information stored in the storage unit 202 will be described later.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the flow of deterioration evaluation processing according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 3A shows measurement data acquired from a plurality of sensors that measure the state of the evaluation object.
  • the control unit 201 of the information processing apparatus 200 may, for example, directly collect measurement data from a plurality of sensors, or may acquire measurement data measured by a plurality of sensors from another communication device.
  • the control unit 201 may execute preprocessing on the measurement data, for example.
  • the preprocessing involves, for example, the removal of unwanted data that can be noise. For example, data in a state different from the normal stable operating state, such as measurement data when the evaluation target is being cleaned, inspected, or just started and the operation is not stable yet. If the measurement data of the included period is brought into the evaluation of deterioration, it may become noise. Therefore, the control unit 201 may execute a preprocessing for removing the measurement data during the non-normal operation in advance. In another embodiment, the control unit 201 may arrange the window period described below so as not to include the measurement data during the abnormal operation.
  • the control unit 201 sets a plurality of window periods for the measurement data.
  • the window period may be, for example, a period of a predetermined length, and in one embodiment, the control unit 201 may process the measurement data in units of the window period.
  • n window periods of window period 1 to window period n are set in time series.
  • the first window period 1 in the time series may be used as a reference window period.
  • the reference window period may be set to, for example, a period in which the evaluation target has little deterioration and the evaluation target is operating normally.
  • the reference window period may be set to the early days when the evaluation object has just been installed or replaced and put into operation.
  • the other window period of the plurality of window periods may be set after the reference window period, for example.
  • control unit 201 acquires the measurement data 1 of the reference window period 1 and the measurement data of a plurality of other window periods.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates a case where the measurement data 2 of the window period 2 is acquired.
  • the control unit 201 models the relationship between the sensors in the window period as a sparse structure model for each of the acquired measurement data of the plurality of window periods.
  • the sparse structure model may be, for example, a model having a structure obtained by extracting the essential connection between variables from multivariate data.
  • the sparse structure model may be, for example, a structure that is not a "dense structure" in which all variables are connected by some kind of correlation, and is obtained as a result of omitting weak correlations and leaving only strong correlations. It may be a "sparse structure".
  • the sparse structure model has a structure in which, for example, in a matrix-represented correlation (for example, an accuracy matrix for a variance-covariance matrix of multivariate data), most of the components are sparse matrices (sparse matrix). It can be represented by a model.
  • a sparse structure model that models the relationship between sensors based on the measurement data in the above-mentioned window period is generated using algorithms such as a Gaussian graphical model (GGM) and a graphical lasso. be able to.
  • FIG. 3 (c) illustrates a sparse structure model in a graph structure.
  • the sparse structure model may be represented by other expressions such as an Ising model and a Potts model.
  • the control unit 201 changes the change score of the collapse of the relationship generated between the sparse structure model obtained from the measurement data 1 of the window period 1 as a reference and the sparse structure model obtained from the measurement data of another window period. Detect as. For example, the control unit 201 may calculate a change score including the degree of change for each sensor from the sparse structure model of the window period 1 and the window period 2 as a reference (FIG. 3 (c)). Since the change score can be obtained from the reference window period 1 and the sparse structure model of another window period, if the number of window periods is n, n-1 change scores can be obtained. .. Further, the change score can be obtained by calculating the difference between distributions using, for example, KL divergence (Kullback-Leibler divergence), JS divergence (Jensen-Shannon divergence), and the like.
  • KL divergence Kullback-Leibler divergence
  • JS divergence Jensen-Shannon divergence
  • the control unit 201 clusters the obtained plurality of change scores. For example, when the change score is obtained by KL divergence, the change score is represented by a vector whose component is the degree of change for each sensor of a plurality of sensors. Therefore, the change score can be plotted as points on a multidimensional space centered on each of the components of the change score. In FIG. 3D, an example in which the points of the change score are plotted in two dimensions is shown, but in reality, the points of the change score may be plotted in a multidimensional space having as many dimensions as the number of sensors. Then, the control unit 201 may cluster the points corresponding to the plurality of change scores plotted on the multidimensional space.
  • control unit 201 may perform learning using a mixed Gaussian model and perform clustering of change scores.
  • control unit 201 may execute clustering using other algorithms such as DBSCAN (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) and K-means (k-means).
  • FIG. 3 (d) shows two clusters obtained as a result of clustering.
  • the control unit 201 further provides a plurality of window periods in the measurement data after the plurality of window periods used for clustering, and adds points of change scores corresponding to each window period to the cluster.
  • the cluster in which the points of the change score to be added are clustered may be, for example, the cluster closest to the points of the change score to be added.
  • the cluster in which the points of the change score to be added are clustered may be determined by another method such as performing clustering again.
  • the control unit 201 responds to the addition of the point to the cluster, for example, by removing the point having the oldest window period among the points of the change score belonging to the cluster. Old points belonging to may be removed.
  • the control unit 201 evaluates the deterioration of the evaluation target based on the movement of the position of the cluster. For example, the control unit 201 may evaluate the deterioration of the evaluation target based on the movement distance, the movement speed, the movement acceleration, and the like at the position of the cluster.
  • the moving distance of the cluster may be, for example, the distance between the cluster specified based on the measurement data at the initial stage of operation and the cluster after the movement specified based on the subsequent measurement data.
  • the distance between clusters can be expressed as the distance between the centers of gravity of the clusters. Further, as shown in FIG.
  • control unit 201 controls the average of the values such as the movement distance, the movement speed, and the movement acceleration in each of the plurality of clusters. Deterioration of the evaluation target may be evaluated based on statistical values such as variance.
  • the measurement data measured by the sensor may include fluctuations caused by factors other than deterioration of the evaluation target.
  • the fluctuation of the measured value due to factors other than deterioration includes many factors showing reversible changes that can return to the original state. For example, fluctuations in sensor measurements due to day-night differences, weather differences, and whether peripheral devices are operating are reversible changes that can return to their original values in the long run. Is. Therefore, it is presumed that the fluctuation of the measured value due to the factors showing these reversible changes can contribute to the cluster division, but it is a component that does not change the position of the cluster so much in the long term.
  • the deterioration that occurs in the evaluation target is often an irreversible phenomenon, and it is unlikely that the fluctuation of the measured value of the sensor that once occurred due to the deterioration will return to the original. Therefore, as described above, by clustering the change scores and following the movement of the cluster position over a long period of time, such as months, years, and decades, the evaluation object is based on the movement of the cluster. It is possible to evaluate the deterioration of. Then, when the deterioration of the evaluation target is evaluated based on the movement of the cluster in this way, the deterioration of the evaluation target can be evaluated by suppressing the influence of the fluctuation of the measurement data caused by factors other than the deterioration.
  • the window period may be a period of a predetermined length
  • It is a vector whose elements are the measured values of a plurality of sensors at each time point.
  • x k is a vector whose element is the measured value of each sensor of a plurality of sensors at the time point k, and can be expressed by the following equation.
  • x k (x k1 , x k2 , ..., x ki , ..., x kM ) T ... Equation 2
  • M is the total number of sensors.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an operation flow of a process for generating a sparse structure model for a window period as a reference according to an embodiment.
  • the control unit 201 may start the process of FIG. 4 when, for example, an execution instruction of an operation flow for generating a sparse structure model of the window period as the reference of FIG. 4 is input.
  • the control unit 201 acquires a data matrix X ref including the measured values measured during the reference window period from the measurement data measured by the plurality of sensors that measure the information of the evaluation target.
  • the reference window period may be referred to as, for example, the reference window period.
  • the reference window period may be set to, for example, a period in which the evaluation target has little deterioration and the evaluation target is operating normally.
  • the control unit 201 may read the data matrix X ref from the measurement data stored in the storage unit 202.
  • the control unit 201 generates a sparse structure model from the data matrix X ref including the measurement data of the sensor in the reference window period, and this operation flow ends.
  • the control unit 201 may generate a variance-covariance matrix based on the measurement data of each sensor of the plurality of sensors in the reference window period, and sparse the generated variance-covariance matrix to generate a sparse structure model.
  • the sparse structure model can be derived by GGM.
  • GGM the control unit 201 derives GGM: p (x
  • the embodiment is not limited to this, and the sparse structure model may be generated by other methods.
  • the sparse structure model (for example, GGM: p (x
  • the change score is, for example, how much the measurement data of the plurality of sensors measured in the window period after the reference window period changes with respect to the measurement data of the plurality of sensors measured in the above-mentioned reference window period. It may be a score that evaluates.
  • the change score can be obtained by calculating the difference between the distributions between the sparse structure model of the reference window period and the sparse structure model of the window period to be evaluated. Differences between distributions can be calculated using, for example, KL divergence, JS divergence, and the like.
  • KL divergence KL divergence
  • JS divergence JS divergence
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an operation flow of deterioration evaluation processing according to an embodiment.
  • the control unit 201 may start the operation flow of FIG. 5 when an execution instruction of the deterioration evaluation process is input.
  • j may be a number for identifying the window period
  • L may be the number of window periods used for learning.
  • the control unit 201 may read the data matrix Xj from the measurement data stored in advance in the storage unit 202.
  • control unit 201 In S502, the control unit 201 generates a sparse structure model for each window period j. For example, the control unit 201 may derive GGM: p (x
  • the control unit 201 in S503, in each of the window period j (j 1 ... L) , calculates the variation degree a i for each sensor i of the plurality of sensors.
  • the control unit 201 uses, for example, the GGM: p (x
  • X) of the window period j to be evaluated by using the KL divergence equation shown in the following equation 3. may calculate the change of a i for each sensor i with the j). Then, the control unit 201, with respect to the window period j, change scores A j ⁇ a 1, a 2, ..., a i, ..., a M ⁇ to the change of a i for each sensor i component get.
  • the control unit 201 the respective components of the change score A j on multidimensional space having axes, the point corresponding to change scores A j for each window period j may be plotted.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the flow of deterioration evaluation processing according to the embodiment, and as shown in FIG. 6A, the control unit 201 has a change score A j obtained for each of the window periods j. May be plotted on a multidimensional space. In FIG.
  • control unit 201 may cluster the plotted points of the plurality of change scores.
  • control unit 201 may perform learning using a mixed Gaussian model and perform clustering on points with a plurality of change scores.
  • control unit 201 may determine the number of clusters used for clustering in the mixed Gaussian model using indicators such as Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Further, the embodiment is not limited to clustering by a mixed Gaussian model, and the control unit 201 may execute clustering by another algorithm such as DBSCAN or K-means clustering.
  • AIC Akaike's Information Criterion
  • BIC Bayesian Information Criterion
  • FIG. 6 (b) illustrates clustering of change scores, and change scores are classified into two clusters.
  • the center of gravity of the cluster can be used as a representative point representing the cluster. In FIG. 6B, the center of gravity is shown as a representative point of the cluster.
  • the representative point representing the cluster may be a point representing a point in the cluster other than the center of gravity.
  • control unit 201 can specify, for example, the initial position of the cluster. Then, in the subsequent processing after S506, the control unit 201 is, for example, an evaluation target from the measurement data of the sensor during the period of the target for evaluating the deterioration state of the evaluation target (hereinafter, may be referred to as the evaluation target period). Evaluate the deterioration of things.
  • the control unit 201 determines whether or not there is measurement data for the evaluation target period.
  • the evaluation target period may be, for example, a period for evaluating the deterioration of the evaluation target, and may be a period including measurement data measured after the learning period for performing clustering. If there is no measurement data for the evaluation target period (S506 is NO), the flow repeats the process of S506. On the other hand, if there is measurement data for the evaluation target period (YES in S506), the flow proceeds to S507.
  • the control unit 201 acquires the data matrix Xo from the measurement data of the evaluation target period.
  • Q may be the number of window periods included in the measurement data of the evaluation target period.
  • the control unit 201 may read the data matrix Xo from the measurement data stored in advance in the storage unit 202.
  • the control unit 201 in S508 generates a sparse structure model from the data matrix X o for each window period o.
  • the control unit 201 may derive GGM: p (x
  • the control unit 201 calculates the degree of change for each sensor i of the plurality of sensors in each window period o of the evaluation target period.
  • the degree of change can be calculated, for example, by using X o instead of X j in the KL divergence formula shown in the above formula 3, and the control unit 201 can thereby calculate the change score A o for each window period o. To get.
  • the control unit 201 adds the obtained change score Ao to the cluster.
  • the control unit 201 may cluster the change score Ao to the cluster closest to the point where the change score Ao is plotted on the multidimensional space.
  • the control unit 201 again by adding the change score A o, etc. perform the clustering by the Gaussian mixture model, change scores A o may determine the cluster to be clustered. Then, for example, by adding the change score Ao to the cluster, the cluster can move.
  • the FIG. 6 (c) the example of adding the change score A o the cluster are the indicated, the addition of the change scores A o to the cluster, the cluster is moving.
  • the control unit 201 evaluates the deterioration of the evaluation target object based on the movement of the position of the cluster, outputs the evaluation result, and the main operation flow ends.
  • the evaluation result may be, for example, the degree of deterioration indicating the degree of deterioration of the evaluation object.
  • the control unit 201 evaluates a value representing the movement of the cluster from the position of the cluster in the learning period specified in S505 to the position of the cluster including the point of the change score in the evaluation target period specified in S511. It may be output as the degree of deterioration of the object.
  • the values representing the movement may be, for example, the movement distance, the movement speed, the movement acceleration, and the like of the cluster. For example, FIG.
  • 6D shows an example in which the distance between the centers of gravity of two clusters is used as the degree of deterioration, and the user can use the magnitude of the distance between the centers of gravity output as the degree of deterioration to evaluate the object.
  • the state of deterioration can be estimated.
  • FIG. 6D shows an example in which a value representing the movement of one cluster is used as the degree of deterioration
  • the value representing the movement of clusters may be represented by, for example, statistical values such as the average value, the median value, the mode value, and the distribution of the values representing the movement of each cluster of a plurality of clusters.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the movement of a plurality of clusters. For example, as shown in FIG. 7A, it is assumed that there are three clusters A, B, and C, and each cluster is moving.
  • the control unit 201 may output a statistical value (for example, an average value) of a value representing the movement acquired in each of the three clusters as the degree of deterioration.
  • the control unit 201 does not have to use the cluster in which the value representing the movement of the cluster is a predetermined value or less and the movement is small in the evaluation of deterioration.
  • the movement of cluster B is very small.
  • the control unit 201 may acquire the degree of deterioration from the value representing the movement of the remaining clusters, except for the clusters whose movement value is equal to or less than a predetermined value.
  • the control unit 201 has a statistical value (for example, an average value) of values representing the movement of cluster A and cluster C, except for cluster B whose value representing movement is a predetermined value or less. May be output as the degree of deterioration.
  • control unit 201 determines and outputs the necessity of maintenance for the evaluation object based on the movement of the cluster. You may.
  • the control unit 201 may refer to the determination information 800 and determine whether or not maintenance is required for the evaluation target.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the determination information 800 according to the embodiment.
  • the determination information 800 for example, information for determining the necessity of maintenance work for the evaluation target may be registered.
  • a threshold value is registered in the determination information 800 of FIG. 8A.
  • the threshold value for example, a value indicating the movement of the cluster from the position of the cluster in a state where the deterioration of the evaluation target is small to the position of the cluster in a state where it is desirable to perform maintenance work on the evaluation target is examined in advance. , Is registered.
  • the control unit 201 may output information prompting maintenance work for the evaluation target when the value representing the movement of the cluster specified in S512 is larger than the threshold value.
  • the output of the information prompting the maintenance work may be, for example, displaying information such as a message prompting the maintenance work of the evaluation target object to be displayed on a display device such as a display connected to the information processing device 200. Further, in another example, the output of the information prompting the maintenance work may be to notify the administrator of the evaluation target object of the information prompting the maintenance work by e-mail or the like.
  • information for determining the necessity of maintenance work may be registered for each type of deterioration of the evaluation target object.
  • information on the movement direction is registered in addition to the threshold value of the movement distance of the cluster in association with the type of deterioration of the evaluation target object.
  • the threshold value of the movement distance of the cluster is associated with the type of deterioration of the evaluation target, and the information for designating the cluster used for specifying the movement distance is registered in association with each other. ing.
  • the threshold value of the movement distance of the cluster, the range of the movement speed, and the range of the acceleration of the movement are registered in association with the type of deterioration of the evaluation object.
  • the deterioration process may also differ depending on the type of deterioration.
  • the tendency of cluster movement may differ depending on the type of deterioration.
  • another information that characterizes the movement of the cluster is used, for example, the movement direction of the cluster shown in FIG. 8 (b) and the information for specifying the cluster used for specifying the movement distance shown in FIG. 8 (c). Therefore, it is possible to specify the type of deterioration.
  • FIG. 8 (b) the movement direction of the cluster shown in FIG. 8 (b)
  • the control unit 201 may refer to the determination information 800, determine the necessity of maintenance for the evaluation target according to the type of deterioration, and output the determination result. For example, if the movement of the cluster satisfies the condition of deterioration of long-term creep registered in the determination information 800, the control unit 201 may output information prompting maintenance of deterioration of long-term creep. On the other hand, if the movement of the cluster satisfies the condition of corrosion / wear deterioration registered in the determination information 800, the control unit 201 may output information prompting maintenance of the corrosion / wear deterioration.
  • control unit 201 can evaluate the deterioration of the evaluation target object based on the movement of the clusters obtained by clustering the change scores.
  • the maintenance work execution interval is longer than the average life of the evaluation object. Can also be set shorter.
  • the deterioration state of the evaluation target can be estimated with high accuracy based on the movement of the cluster, it is possible to lengthen the execution interval of the maintenance work. As a result, the cost of maintenance work and the work load can be reduced.
  • the deterioration of the evaluation target can be detected with high accuracy based on the movement of the cluster, so that the user can evaluate the evaluation target. Maintenance work can be performed before an object breaks. Therefore, it is possible to avoid an unplanned stoppage of the evaluation target.
  • the deterioration of the boiler tube group is described as an example of the evaluation target, but the embodiment is not limited to this, and the embodiment is also applied to the deterioration of other parts, devices, and equipment. be able to.
  • the embodiments are not limited to this.
  • the above-mentioned operation flow is an example, and the embodiment is not limited thereto.
  • the operation flow may be executed by changing the order of processing, may include additional processing, or may omit some processing.
  • FIG. 5 shows an example in which the processes from S501 to S505 and the processes from S506 to S512 are continuously executed, but the embodiment is not limited to this.
  • the processes from S501 to S505 and the processes from S506 to S512 may be executed as different operation flows.
  • the processes from S501 to S505 need only be executed once when the operation of the evaluation target object at the initial stage of operation is stable.
  • the measurement data for a predetermined period such as once a month or once every six months is accumulated
  • the measurement data for the predetermined period is executed as the data for the evaluation target period each time. You can do it.
  • the embodiment is not limited to this, and other values are used for the cluster. It can also be used as the moving distance of.
  • the cluster moves the shortest or longest distance between a plurality of change score points in the cluster before the move and a plurality of change score points in the cluster after the move. It may be used as a distance.
  • the average of the distances at all combinations of the change score points included in the two clusters before and after the movement may be used as the movement distance of the cluster.
  • the addition of the points of the change score corresponding to the window period of the evaluation target period to the cluster may be executed in the order according to the time series of the measurement of the measurement data in one example.
  • the control unit 201 may add the points of the change score corresponding to the window period included in the predetermined period to the cluster in chronological order, collectively for each predetermined period. In this case, the points of the change score corresponding to the window period within the predetermined period may be added in any order.
  • control unit 201 operates as, for example, the acquisition unit 211. Further, in the process of S505, the control unit 201 operates as, for example, the specific unit 212. In the process of S512, the control unit 201 operates as, for example, the evaluation unit 213.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration of a computer 900 for realizing the information processing apparatus 200 according to the embodiment.
  • the hardware configuration for realizing the information processing device 200 of FIG. 9 includes, for example, a processor 901, a memory 902, a storage device 903, a reading device 904, a communication interface 906, and an input / output interface 907.
  • the processor 901, the memory 902, the storage device 903, the reading device 904, the communication interface 906, and the input / output interface 907 are connected to each other via, for example, the bus 908.
  • the processor 901 may be, for example, a single processor, a multiprocessor, or a multicore.
  • the processor 901 provides a part or all of the functions of the control unit 201 described above by executing, for example, a program describing the procedure of the operation flow described above using the memory 902.
  • the processor 901 of the information processing device 200 operates as the acquisition unit 211, the specific unit 212, and the evaluation unit 213 by reading and executing the program stored in the storage device 903.
  • the memory 902 is, for example, a semiconductor memory, and may include a RAM area and a ROM area.
  • the storage device 903 is, for example, a semiconductor memory such as a hard disk or a flash memory, or an external storage device.
  • RAM is an abbreviation for Random Access Memory.
  • ROM is an abbreviation for Read Only Memory.
  • the reading device 904 accesses the removable storage medium 905 according to the instructions of the processor 901.
  • the removable storage medium 905 is realized by, for example, a semiconductor device, a medium in which information is input / output by magnetic action, a medium in which information is input / output by optical action, and the like.
  • the semiconductor device is, for example, a USB (Universal Serial Bus) memory.
  • the medium to which information is input / output by magnetic action is, for example, a magnetic disk.
  • the medium to which information is input / output by optical action is, for example, a CD-ROM, a DVD, a Blu-ray Disc, or the like (Blu-ray is a registered trademark).
  • CD is an abbreviation for Compact Disc.
  • DVD is an abbreviation for Digital Versatile Disk.
  • the storage unit 202 may include, for example, a memory 902, a storage device 903, and a removable storage medium 905.
  • the storage device 903 of the information processing device 200 stores, for example, the determination information 800.
  • the communication interface 906 communicates with another device according to the instruction of the processor 901.
  • the communication interface 906 may communicate with the sensor 950, which measures the state of the evaluation object, by wire or wireless communication, and collect measurement data from the sensor 950.
  • the communication interface 906 may communicate with another device for storing the measurement data measured by the sensor 950 by wire or wireless communication to acquire the measurement data.
  • the communication interface 906 is an example of the above-mentioned communication unit 203.
  • the input / output interface 907 is, for example, an interface between an input device and an output device.
  • the input device is, for example, a device such as a keyboard, a mouse, or a touch panel that receives an instruction from a user.
  • the output device is, for example, a display device such as a display and an audio device such as a speaker.
  • Each program according to the embodiment is provided to the information processing apparatus 200 in the following form, for example. (1) It is pre-installed in the storage device 903. (2) Provided by a removable storage medium 905. (3) It is provided from a server such as a program server.
  • the hardware configuration of the computer 900 for realizing the information processing apparatus 200 described with reference to FIG. 9 is an example, and the embodiment is not limited to this. For example, a part of the above configuration may be deleted, or a new configuration may be added. Further, in another embodiment, for example, some or all the functions of the above-mentioned control unit 201 may be implemented as hardware by FPGA, SoC, ASIC, PLD, or the like.
  • FPGA is an abbreviation for Field Programmable Gate Array.
  • SoC is an abbreviation for System-on-a-chip.
  • ASIC is an abbreviation for Application Specific Integrated Circuit.
  • PLD is an abbreviation for Programmable Logic Device.
  • Control unit 202 Storage unit 203 Communication unit 211 Acquisition unit 212 Specific unit 213 Evaluation unit 800 Judgment information 900 Computer 901 Processor 902 Memory 903 Storage device 904 Reading device 905 Detachable storage medium 906 Communication interface 907 Input / output interface 908 Bus 950 sensor

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Un dispositif de traitement d'informations d'un mode de réalisation de la présente invention comporte : une unité d'acquisition qui acquiert une pluralité de scores de changement par la recherche, dans chacune d'une pluralité de périodes de fenêtre compris dans une période d'apprentissage, d'un score de changement ayant pour composant le degré de changement, pour chacun d'une pluralité de capteurs qui mesurent l'état d'un objet devant être évalué, d'un modèle de structure clairsemée créé à partir de données de mesure de série chronologique obtenues à partir des capteurs qui ont été mesurées dans une fenêtre temporelle après une fenêtre temporelle de référence, par rapport à un modèle de structure clairsemée créé à partir des données de mesure de série chronologique mesurées dans la fenêtre temporelle de référence ; une unité de spécification qui regroupe une pluralité de scores de changement et spécifie la position du groupe ; et une unité d'évaluation qui évalue la détérioration de l'objet devant être évalué sur la base du mouvement de la position du groupe généré par l'ajout au groupe d'au moins un score de changement recherché dans au moins une fenêtre temporelle compris dans une période devant être évaluée.
PCT/JP2020/019549 2020-05-15 2020-05-15 Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation Ceased WO2021229815A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2020/019549 WO2021229815A1 (fr) 2020-05-15 2020-05-15 Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation
JP2022522488A JP7367866B2 (ja) 2020-05-15 2020-05-15 情報処理装置、評価方法、および評価プログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2020/019549 WO2021229815A1 (fr) 2020-05-15 2020-05-15 Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021229815A1 true WO2021229815A1 (fr) 2021-11-18

Family

ID=78525561

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2020/019549 Ceased WO2021229815A1 (fr) 2020-05-15 2020-05-15 Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé d'évaluation et programme d'évaluation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7367866B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2021229815A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2023102657A (ja) * 2022-01-12 2023-07-25 株式会社明電舎 設備診断装置、設備診断方法
CN120750748A (zh) * 2025-09-02 2025-10-03 中移(苏州)软件技术有限公司 变更时间编排方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019096014A (ja) * 2017-11-22 2019-06-20 富士通株式会社 判定装置，判定プログラム，判定方法
JP2019153018A (ja) * 2018-03-01 2019-09-12 株式会社日立製作所 診断装置および診断方法

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019096014A (ja) * 2017-11-22 2019-06-20 富士通株式会社 判定装置，判定プログラム，判定方法
JP2019153018A (ja) * 2018-03-01 2019-09-12 株式会社日立製作所 診断装置および診断方法

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2023102657A (ja) * 2022-01-12 2023-07-25 株式会社明電舎 設備診断装置、設備診断方法
CN120750748A (zh) * 2025-09-02 2025-10-03 中移(苏州)软件技术有限公司 变更时间编排方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7367866B2 (ja) 2023-10-24
JPWO2021229815A1 (fr) 2021-11-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10809153B2 (en) Detecting apparatus, detection method, and program
JP7040851B2 (ja) 異常検知装置、異常検知方法及び異常検知プログラム
KR101316486B1 (ko) 이상 검지 방법 및 시스템
JP5260343B2 (ja) プラント運転状態監視方法
JP5901140B2 (ja) システムの高い可用性のためにセンサデータを補間する方法、コンピュータプログラム、システム。
JP2012512351A (ja) 航空エンジン内の故障の識別
WO2020090767A1 (fr) Dispositif de diagnostic d'anomalie, procédé de diagnostic d'anomalie, et programme
JP5669553B2 (ja) 異常検知装置、異常検知方法及び異常検知プログラム
EP3795975A1 (fr) Appareil de détection d'anomalie, procédé de détection d'anomalie, et programme de détection d'anomalie
JP6714498B2 (ja) 設備診断装置及び設備診断方法
JPWO2020188696A1 (ja) 異常検知装置および異常検知方法
JP2016095751A (ja) 異常機器特定プログラム、異常機器特定方法、及び、異常機器特定装置
WO2021019760A1 (fr) Procédé de diagnostic d'anomalie, dispositif de diagnostic d'anomalie, et système de diagnostic d'anomalie
US11941495B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method, and recording medium
CN114386730A (zh) 一种燃烧稳定性评价方法及系统
JP2020052460A (ja) 異常検出システム、及び異常検出プログラム
JP7367866B2 (ja) 情報処理装置、評価方法、および評価プログラム
JP5490277B2 (ja) プラント運転状態監視方法
JP2016177676A (ja) 診断装置、診断方法、診断システムおよび診断プログラム
WO2022239612A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de plante, dispositif de surveillance de plante et programme de surveillance de plante
CN120063369A (zh) 一种基于分布式光纤传感器的隧道监测方法及系统
JP7230371B2 (ja) 異常検出装置、異常検出方法、異常検出プログラム及び異常検出システム
JPWO2016163008A1 (ja) 異常診断装置および異常診断方法
JP6459345B2 (ja) 変動データ管理システム及びその特異性検出方法
JP5490278B2 (ja) プラント運転状態監視方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20935353

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022522488

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20935353

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1