[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2021210486A1 - Dispositif, procédé et programme de traitement d'informations - Google Patents

Dispositif, procédé et programme de traitement d'informations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021210486A1
WO2021210486A1 PCT/JP2021/014884 JP2021014884W WO2021210486A1 WO 2021210486 A1 WO2021210486 A1 WO 2021210486A1 JP 2021014884 W JP2021014884 W JP 2021014884W WO 2021210486 A1 WO2021210486 A1 WO 2021210486A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
provider
information
user
price
information processing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2021/014884
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
典之 鈴木
里沙 松岡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sony Group Corp
Original Assignee
Sony Group Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sony Group Corp filed Critical Sony Group Corp
Priority to JP2022515340A priority Critical patent/JP7718411B2/ja
Publication of WO2021210486A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021210486A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903—Querying
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/907—Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services

Definitions

  • the user-side terminal device 200 sends a request for information provision to the information processing device 300, sends a message to the provider-side terminal device 100, and receives and displays an image transmitted from the provider-side terminal device 100. It is used to do things like that.
  • the information processing device 300 When the information processing device 300 receives a question from the user-side terminal device 200, it determines a candidate provider that is presumed to be optimal for answering the question (providing information). Then, the user-side terminal device 200 presents the user by displaying the provider candidate. At this point, the price of the consideration for providing the information of the candidate provider is also presented to the user.
  • the condition estimation unit 301 performs semantic analysis on the question from the user transmitted from the user-side terminal device 200, and estimates the condition of the provider necessary for answering the question.
  • the condition estimation unit 301 classifies the question into part speeches such as nouns and verbs, and estimates the condition of the provider from the meaning of each part of speech. For example, if the question is "About the entrance examination of university A”, the nouns "university A” and “admission examination” are extracted from the question, and the conditions of the provider are “university A student", “graduate of university A”, and “university A”. Estimate conditions such as "worker” and "experienced in entrance examination work”.
  • the attribute information includes information input by the provider himself and information acquired by the sensor unit 109.
  • Attribute information entered by the provider includes basic personal information that identifies the provider such as name, gender, address, age, and date of birth, as well as occupation, income, family structure, hobbies, academic background, language used, and so on.
  • interests / interests / hobbies such as favorite events, favorite brands, favorite comics, favorite movies, favorite books, favorite websites, etc.
  • the approval result database 306 includes selection results of approval, refusal, and negotiation that the provider has made in the past for the request for information provision from the user, and approval of whether the user receives information from the provider in the past. It registers the selection results of refusal and negotiation.
  • the approval result database 306 may be configured in the storage unit 402 of the server device 400.
  • step S104 the user inputs a question as a request for information provision in the user-side terminal device 200.
  • the input question is transmitted from the user-side terminal device 200 to the information processing device 300 and supplied to the condition estimation unit 301.
  • the provider candidates When there are a plurality of provider candidates, in the display of FIG. 10A, it is preferable to display the provider candidates in descending order of consideration price or match rate. This is because it is highly likely that a provider with a high price and a candidate with a high match rate will give an appropriate answer to a user's question. In addition, when displaying a plurality of provider candidates, it is preferable that the user can sort the provider candidates.
  • the price determination unit 304 adds the desired price input by the provider candidate to the element to determine the price of the new consideration. If the user approves the price different from the desired price entered by the candidate provider in step 143, the candidate provider may be disadvantaged. Therefore, when the price determination unit 304 determines the price of the new consideration in step S144, the user terminal device 200 displays the information of the provider candidate and the price of the new consideration again, and the user selects the provider again. Let me. When the provider candidate whose new consideration price has been determined is selected again by the user, as shown in FIG. 11A in step S114, the fact that the request has been made in the provider terminal device 100, a question, the consideration price, etc. are displayed. And present it to the selected provider candidates.
  • Another example of information is the amount of attributes registered by experienced people. The more the provider registers personally identifiable information such as name, face photo, and organization to which the provider belongs, the higher the reliability of the provider and the higher the price of consideration.
  • the information processing apparatus according to any one of (1) to (9), which receives an evaluation of information provision made by the provider from the user and / or the provider.
  • (11) The information processing apparatus according to (10), wherein the evaluation is performed based on the criteria of whether the price of the consideration is high, low, or appropriate.
  • (12) The information processing apparatus according to (11), wherein the evaluation is further performed by an additional payment from the user to the provider.
  • (13) The information processing device according to (11), wherein the price determination unit determines the price of the consideration based on the evaluation.
  • the information processing apparatus according to any one of (1) to (13), wherein the request for providing information from the user is made as a question, and the information is provided by the provider as an answer to the question.
  • the information processing device 15) The information processing device according to (4), wherein the attribute information is information input by the provider. (16) The information processing device according to (4), wherein the attribute information is information acquired by a sensor. (17) The information processing device according to any one of (1) to (16), wherein the information provided by the provider is information about real estate. (18) Determine candidates for one or more providers to provide information in response to requests from users to provide information. An information processing method for determining the price of consideration for providing information about the candidate provider. (19) Determine candidates for one or more providers to provide information in response to requests from users to provide information. A program that causes a computer to execute an information processing method that determines the price of consideration for providing information about the candidate provider.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Library & Information Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un dispositif de traitement d'informations comprenant : une unité de détermination de candidat de fournisseur qui détermine un ou plusieurs candidats d'un fournisseur fournissant des informations pour une demande émanant d'un utilisateur ; et une unité de détermination de prix qui détermine le prix de récompenses pour les candidats du fournisseur pour fournir des informations.
PCT/JP2021/014884 2020-04-17 2021-04-08 Dispositif, procédé et programme de traitement d'informations Ceased WO2021210486A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022515340A JP7718411B2 (ja) 2020-04-17 2021-04-08 情報処理装置、情報処理方法および情報処理プログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020074114 2020-04-17
JP2020-074114 2020-04-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021210486A1 true WO2021210486A1 (fr) 2021-10-21

Family

ID=78084953

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/014884 Ceased WO2021210486A1 (fr) 2020-04-17 2021-04-08 Dispositif, procédé et programme de traitement d'informations

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7718411B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2021210486A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2024161650A1 (fr) * 2023-02-03 2024-08-08 オリンパス株式会社 Serveur de mise en correspondance, système de mise en correspondance et procédé de mise en correspondance

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002150164A (ja) * 2000-11-13 2002-05-24 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc 情報管理システム、およびこのシステムに用いられる情報管理サーバ
JP2002215920A (ja) * 2001-01-16 2002-08-02 Ntt Communications Kk 情報売買方法及び情報提供装置並びに情報売買のためのプログラム
JP2003123001A (ja) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-25 Sony Corp 双方向通信システム及び双方向通信方法
JP2004005128A (ja) * 2002-05-31 2004-01-08 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 情報処理システムおよびそれを利用した電子商取引システム
JP2009093552A (ja) * 2007-10-11 2009-04-30 Fujitsu Ltd 情報収集プログラム、情報収集装置及び方法

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5343023B2 (ja) * 2010-03-02 2013-11-13 日本電信電話株式会社 課金装置、課金方法及びプログラム
JP6602441B1 (ja) * 2018-11-09 2019-11-06 Ａｒｔｅｒｙｅｘ株式会社 情報処理装置、情報処理方法および情報処理プログラム

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002150164A (ja) * 2000-11-13 2002-05-24 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc 情報管理システム、およびこのシステムに用いられる情報管理サーバ
JP2002215920A (ja) * 2001-01-16 2002-08-02 Ntt Communications Kk 情報売買方法及び情報提供装置並びに情報売買のためのプログラム
JP2003123001A (ja) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-25 Sony Corp 双方向通信システム及び双方向通信方法
JP2004005128A (ja) * 2002-05-31 2004-01-08 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 情報処理システムおよびそれを利用した電子商取引システム
JP2009093552A (ja) * 2007-10-11 2009-04-30 Fujitsu Ltd 情報収集プログラム、情報収集装置及び方法

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2024161650A1 (fr) * 2023-02-03 2024-08-08 オリンパス株式会社 Serveur de mise en correspondance, système de mise en correspondance et procédé de mise en correspondance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2021210486A1 (fr) 2021-10-21
JP7718411B2 (ja) 2025-08-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. Personalized tourism recommendations and the E-tourism user experience
Liu et al. Exploring the continuance usage intention of travel applications in the case of Chinese tourists
Assaker et al. Consumer usage of online travel reviews: Expanding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 model
Kalinić et al. What drives customer satisfaction and word of mouth in mobile commerce services? A UTAUT2-based analytical approach
Shin et al. Assessing the impact of textual content concreteness on helpfulness in online travel reviews
US10719883B2 (en) Web property generator
Sabiote-Ortiz et al. Overall perceived value of a tourism service delivered via different media: A cross-cultural perspective
Toepoel et al. What happens if you offer a mobile option to your web panel? Evidence from a probability-based panel of internet users
Jiménez et al. Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products
Chen et al. Understanding extended theory of planned behavior to access backpackers’ intention in self-service travel websites
Loureiro et al. Pressing the buy button: Generation Y’s online clothing shopping orientation and its impact on purchase
Dhir et al. Rationale for “Liking” on social networking sites
US11880873B2 (en) Systems and methods for inferred review
Dahiya et al. Investigating Indian car buyers’ decision to use digital marketing communication: An empirical application of decomposed TPB
Ku Distributed fascinating knowledge over an online travel community
US9070155B1 (en) Electronic computer engines for analytical searching and methods of use thereof
Maity et al. Market development and value creation for low socioeconomic segments in emerging markets: An integrated perspective using the 4A framework
Aleti et al. Consumer socialization agency in tourism decisions
JP6388994B1 (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム
Noorshella et al. Examining the key factors affecting e-service quality of small online apparel businesses in Malaysia
Shim et al. Virtual sales associates for mature consumers: Technical and social support in e-retail service interactions
Wang et al. Investigating the determinants of IoT device continuance intentions: an empirical study of smart speakers through the lens of Expectation-Confirmation theory
Sabiote Ortiz et al. Overall perceived value of a tourism service: Analysing the spillover effect between electronic channel and consumption of the hotel service
Amar Raju et al. Determinants of website usability: Empirical evidence from tourism sector in India
Wang et al. Congruence in communication and customer booking decision: A cognitive heuristic perspective

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21788626

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022515340

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21788626

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1