WO2020071160A1 - State determination device, state determination method, and state determination program - Google Patents
State determination device, state determination method, and state determination programInfo
- Publication number
- WO2020071160A1 WO2020071160A1 PCT/JP2019/037006 JP2019037006W WO2020071160A1 WO 2020071160 A1 WO2020071160 A1 WO 2020071160A1 JP 2019037006 W JP2019037006 W JP 2019037006W WO 2020071160 A1 WO2020071160 A1 WO 2020071160A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- value
- threshold
- alert
- state
- determination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B21/00—Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for
- G08B21/18—Status alarms
- G08B21/24—Reminder alarms, e.g. anti-loss alarms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
- G08B29/20—Calibration, including self-calibrating arrangements
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a state determination device, a state determination method, and a state determination program.
- Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-188965 filed on October 4, 2018, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- Patent Literature 1 discloses that in a gas flow rate measuring device 38, after a gas flow rate matches an abnormality determination condition and outputs an abnormal signal, the gas flow rate is determined to be abnormal. Describes a technology for automatically resetting an abnormal state by outputting an abnormal state canceling signal when a different abnormal state canceling condition is met, and automatically restoring the state.
- H11-163873 discloses that in the electronic article monitoring device 100 using the resonance tag 40, when a signal exceeding the detection level L1 'is detected, the detection level is set to a level L2' higher than the detection level L1 '. Thus, a technique for suppressing the generation of unnecessary alarms due to false reports is described.
- Patent Literature 1 releases an abnormality when the value becomes equal to or more than an abnormality release establishment value. Therefore, when the fluctuation of the measured value is large, the abnormal state and the normal state can be repeated in a short time. There is. Further, according to Patent Literature 1, even if the abnormality clear condition is not met after a predetermined time elapses, the automatic recovery is performed. Therefore, there is a possibility that the abnormality is released in a state where the abnormality cannot be released. Further, in Patent Literature 2, when the detection level exceeds the detection level L1 ', the detection level is set to a high level L2', so that an abnormal state that should be detected at the original detection level L1 'may not be detected as abnormal. is there.
- One embodiment of the present invention is to cancel the alert even though the state requires attention, or conversely, to continue the alert for a long time even though the state does not require attention. It is an object of the present invention to provide a state determination device that can perform alerting and canceling the alert more appropriately without causing any trouble.
- a state determination device includes an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement value of a measurement target, and an acquired measurement value that is outside a range of a first upper threshold and a lower threshold. And an output unit that outputs the attention information when the value becomes the value.
- the output unit during the output of the attention information, for a predetermined time during the measurement value, the first upper threshold and the lower threshold are The output of the caution information is stopped with reference to the value of the first release threshold set to a different value.
- the alert is released in a state that requires attention, or conversely, the alert continues for a long time even in a state that does not require attention. It is possible to provide a state determination device that can more appropriately issue a warning and release the warning without doing so.
- 5 is a graph illustrating a change over time of a measured value according to the first embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows the processing procedure of a monitoring process. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure of a determination process according to the first embodiment. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure of another determination process according to the first embodiment. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a processing procedure of still another determination processing according to the first embodiment. It is a graph which shows the measured value by a 2nd embodiment. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure of a determination process according to the second embodiment.
- 13 is a graph showing measured values according to the third embodiment.
- 13 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure of a determination process according to a third embodiment.
- It is a block diagram showing the composition of the state judging device by a 4th embodiment.
- It is a conceptual diagram showing a judgment value table, a judgment result table, a judgment state table, and an output table according to the fourth embodiment.
- It is a flow chart which shows a processing procedure of judgment processing by a 4th embodiment.
- It is a conceptual diagram showing an output result by a 4th embodiment.
- It is a graph which shows the measured value by a 5th embodiment.
- It is a flow chart which shows a processing procedure of judgment processing by a 5th embodiment.
- It is a graph which shows another measurement value by a 5th embodiment.
- It is a flow chart which
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment.
- the state determination device 1 receives information on the mechanical device 3 from the monitoring device 2.
- the state determining device 1 determines the state of the mechanical device 3 based on the information acquired from the mechanical device 3 and transmits information based on the determined determination result to the determination result output device 4 via a communication line or the like.
- the state determination device 1 is composed of a computer such as an open server or a mainframe computer.
- the state determination device 1 and the monitoring device 2 are connected via a communication line.
- the state determination device 1 and the determination result output device 4 are connected via a communication line.
- the communication line may be wired or wireless, a public network may be used, a dedicated communication line may be used, or a technology such as VPN (Virtual Private Network) may be used.
- the state determination device 1 includes a CPU 5, a volatile memory 6, a nonvolatile memory 7, and a communication unit 8, which are connected to each other via a bus or the like, and mutually transmit and receive data such as calculation results.
- the non-volatile memory 7 transmits data used by the CPU 5 to the volatile memory 6, and the CPU 5 transmits an operation result calculated using the data of the volatile memory 6 to the communication unit 8.
- the CPU 5 communicates with a communication line via the communication unit 8.
- the volatile memory 6 is a random access memory (RAM) or the like, and the nonvolatile memory 7 is a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid state drive (SSD).
- the volatile memory 6 and the non-volatile memory 7 store various data and programs such as tables necessary for processing by the CPU 5, which is a CPU (Central Processing Unit).
- the volatile memory 6 includes a dictation acquisition unit 10, a determination unit 11, and an output unit 12, and the non-volatile memory 7 includes a determination value database unit 13 and a determination result database unit 14, which will be described later.
- the monitoring device 2 is a device that monitors, inspects, and measures the status of the mechanical device 3 to be monitored, and transmits information obtained by communicating with the communication unit 8 of the status determination device 1.
- the monitoring device 2 includes a monitoring unit 15 for monitoring, inspecting, and measuring the state of the monitoring target.
- the information acquired by the monitoring unit 15 from the monitoring target includes temperature, humidity, color, length, area, volume, position, flow rate, water level, concentration, speed, acceleration, density, mass, voltage, current, Magnetic force, radiation dose, illuminance and so on.
- the monitoring unit 15 is configured by a device that measures the above information (for example, a thermometer, an illuminometer, a camera, and the like).
- a device that measures the above information (for example, a thermometer, an illuminometer, a camera, and the like).
- the temperature of the monitoring target is measured by a thermometer.
- the determination result output device 4 that receives information based on the determination result of the state determination device 1 determining the state of the mechanical device 3 by communicating with the communication unit 8 of the state determination device 1 outputs a determination result output that outputs a determination result.
- a section 16 is provided.
- the determination result output unit 16 is, for example, a display device such as a liquid crystal display, a lighting device such as an LED, or an acoustic device such as a speaker.
- the judgment result output unit 16 is a display device
- the judgment result is output by displaying the state of the monitoring target on the display in color or characters. For example, when the status of the monitoring target is displayed in color, yellow is displayed on a part or the whole of the display when the determination result is caution, and blue is displayed on a part or the front of the display when the determination result is normal.
- characters such as caution and normal are displayed on the display.
- the determination result output unit 16 is a lighting device
- the determination result is output by blinking the lighting color or the lighting of the monitoring target state. For example, when the state of the monitoring target is displayed in the lighting color of the illumination, the lighting color of the illumination is set to yellow if the determination result is caution, and the lighting color of the illumination is set to blue if the determination result is normal. Further, when the state of the monitoring target is displayed by lighting or blinking of the lighting, the lighting is blinked when the judgment result is cautionary, and the lighting is turned on when the judgment result is normal.
- the determination result output unit 16 is an audio device
- the determination result is output by outputting a warning sound such as a beep sound to the state of the monitoring target. For example, if the determination result is caution, a beep sound is output from the audio device, and if the determination result is normal, no output from the audio device is made.
- FIG. 1 shows a configuration in which the monitoring device 2 including the monitoring unit 15 and the determination result output device including the determination result output unit 16 are connected to the status determination device 1, the status determination device 1 includes the monitoring unit 15. And a determination result output unit 16.
- the monitoring unit 15 and the determination result output unit 16 are provided inside the state determination device 1, a series of processes from monitoring to output of the determination result are performed in the state determination device.
- the state determination device 1 is configured to include the CPU 5, the volatile memory 6, and the non-volatile memory 7 in FIG. 1, the present embodiment is not limited thereto, and the acquisition unit 10, the determination unit 11, and the output unit 12 It may be a dedicated electronic circuit.
- FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram of the judgment value table TB1 held by the judgment value database unit 13 and the judgment result table TB2 held by the judgment result database unit 14.
- the determination value table TB1 includes an alert lower threshold (hereinafter, this may be referred to as a lower threshold) TH1 and an alert upper threshold (hereinafter, this may be referred to as an upper threshold) TH2 used by the determiner 11 when making a determination.
- a warning release threshold value hereinafter, this may be referred to as a release threshold value
- the values of the alert lower limit threshold TH1, the alert upper limit threshold TH2, and the alert release threshold TH3 are set when the state determination device 1 is initialized. Note that the value of the alert lower limit threshold TH1, the alert upper limit threshold TH2, and the alert release threshold TH3 may be changed by using a setting tool or the like while the state determination device 1 is operating.
- the determination result table TB2 holds a value designating the output method.
- the determination result indicates a state in which attention is not required for the measurement target. Normal (NORMAL) and a state in which attention is required for the measurement target. (CAUTION).
- FIG. 3 shows graphs 21 to 24 showing the change over time of the measured value TH measured by the monitoring unit 15 for the mechanical device 3.
- the temperature of the mechanical device 3 changes with the influence of the temperature of the surrounding environment and the use of the mechanical device 3. Since the mechanical device 3 cannot operate normally depending on the temperature, a temperature range in which normal operation is possible is set, and the temperature is constantly measured during use, and the temperature is within the temperature range in which normal operation is possible. Need to be confirmed.
- the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time.
- the alert lower limit threshold value TH1 is a threshold value indicating the lower limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition for the machine device 3 to operate normally.
- the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 is a threshold value indicating the upper limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition.
- the alert release threshold TH3 is a threshold for canceling the alert, and is used when the state of the measurement target is determined to be normal after the state of the measurement target is determined to be caution by the state determination device 1. If the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the alert lower threshold TH1 and equal to or less than the alert upper threshold TH2, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at the time T1, and is out of the range of the temperature under the normal operation condition.
- the measured value TH is again lower than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2. The temperature has returned to the normal operating range.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is caution.
- the determination result output device 4 outputs the attention information based on the attention information that is the determination result received from the state determination device 1.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at time T1, becomes TH2 or less at time T2, and becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 again at time T3.
- the measured value TH is again set to the alert upper limit in a short period of time. It may be larger than the threshold value TH2.
- the state determination device 1 It is preferable that the state of the mechanical device 3 is determined to be caution for a predetermined time without being determined to be normal.
- the determination result output device 4 outputs the warning information and the normal information in a short time. The output may be repeated. From such a viewpoint, it is preferable that the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is cautionary without determining that the state is normal for a predetermined time.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH2 at the time T1, becomes less than the alert upper limit threshold TH2 at the time T2, and changes from the alert upper limit threshold TH2 or less after the time T2. I have. Unlike the graph 22, the measured value TH in the graph 23 once falls below the alert upper limit threshold TH2, and does not become larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH2 again for a certain period of time, for example, from time T2 to time T4.
- the measurement value TH measures a value near the alert upper limit threshold TH2 even after the time T2, and there is a possibility that the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH2 again due to a minute change of the measured value TH over time. Not low. For this reason, even if the state in which the measured value TH has fallen below the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 in the graph 23 has continued for a predetermined period of time, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is cautionary without determining that the state is normal. Is preferred.
- the measured value TH may continue to be a value near the alert upper limit threshold TH2 even when the measured value TH falls below the alert upper limit threshold TH2. Therefore, it is preferable that a criterion other than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 is provided in order for the state determination device 1 to determine that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal. Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention, it is preferable to set the alert release threshold TH3 that is smaller than the alert upper threshold TH2, separately from the alert upper threshold TH2.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at the time T1, and becomes equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at the time T2.
- the measured value TH of the graph 24 becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 at time T5, becomes larger than the alert release threshold TH3 again at time T6, and is greater than the alert release threshold TH3 and the alert upper limit threshold after time T6. It has remained below TH2.
- the measured value TH once drops below the alert upper limit threshold TH2 and then drops below the alert release threshold TH3, which is a value sufficiently smaller than the alert upper threshold TH2. Different from the measured value TH.
- the measured value TH of the graph 24 falls below the alert release threshold value TH3 and immediately after the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal, the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 again, and the state is determined. It is unlikely that the device 1 will determine the state of the mechanical device 3 as being alert.
- the measured value TH falls below the alert release threshold TH3 at time T5, and then becomes larger than the alert release threshold TH3 again at time T6 within a short time, and becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3.
- the period is short.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is cautionary without determining that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal for a predetermined time after the alert release threshold value TH3 or less.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at the time T1, and becomes equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at the time T2. Further, in the graph 21, the measured value TH becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 at the time T5, and changes from the alert release threshold TH3 or less after the time T5.
- the measured value TH in the graph 21 is different from the measured value TH in the above-described graph 24, and after falling below the alert release threshold TH3 at time T5, a predetermined time (the period P is equal to or more than a predetermined value), for example, from time T5. It does not become larger than the alert release threshold TH3 again until time T6. Therefore, after a lapse of a predetermined time from time T5, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of a monitoring process periodically performed by the state determination device 1.
- the acquisition unit 10 performs an acquisition process S1 of acquiring the measurement value TH from the monitoring device, and transmits the acquired measurement value TH to the determination unit 11.
- the determination unit 11 performs a determination process S2 of determining the state of the mechanical device 3 based on the measurement value TH received from the acquisition unit 10, and transmits the determined information to the output unit 12.
- the output unit 12 performs an output process S3 of outputting the information determined by the determination unit 11 to the determination result output device 4.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination process S2.
- the determining unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper threshold TH2 or whether the measured value TH is smaller than the alert lower threshold TH1 in order to determine whether or not the alert is within the alert threshold range. (S10).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is normal (S11). If the determination result is normal (S11: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to caution (S12), and ends the determination process S2. If the determination result is not normal (S11: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S2 as it is.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is caution (S13). Note that the determination result is set to normal as an initial value when the state determination device 1 is initialized, and is set to caution or normal again in step S12 or step S17 described below. If the determination result is caution (S13: YES), the determination unit 11 determines whether the period P has not been measured (S14).
- the determination unit 11 If the period P has not been measured (S14: YES), the determination unit 11 starts measuring the period P (S15), and if the period P has been measured (S14: NO), the determination unit 11 leaves the period as it is. It is determined whether P is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (S16).
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to normal (S17), ends the measurement of the period P (S18), and ends the determination process S2.
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S2.
- the judgment unit 11 ends the measurement of the period P (S18), and ends the judgment processing S2.
- the determination unit 11 may perform the determination process S2 without using the alert release threshold TH3 as shown in FIG. 5, but as shown in FIG. 6, the alert release is performed in step S20. It is preferable to perform the determination processing S2 using the threshold value TH3.
- the process of FIG. 6 is the same as the process of FIG. 5 except that step S20 is added. If the measured value TH is outside the range of the alert threshold (S10: NO), the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 (S20), and the measured value TH alerts. If it is equal to or smaller than the release threshold TH3 (S20: YES), the determination unit 11 proceeds to step S13. If the measured value TH is larger than the alert release threshold TH3 (S20: NO), the determination unit 11 proceeds to step S18.
- the alert is released in addition to the alert upper limit threshold TH2 which is a determination criterion for notifying the user that the measurement target needs attention.
- the alert release threshold TH3 which is a criterion for performing the alert, is provided.
- the state of the mechanical device 3 is determined to be normal when the measured value TH becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 which is smaller than the alert upper threshold TH2 for a predetermined time. I do. For this reason, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal even though the state needs attention, or conversely, the state determination device 1 The state of the device 3 is not determined to be caution. As described above, the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment can appropriately alert and release the alert.
- the alert release threshold TH3 is set to a value smaller than the alert upper threshold TH2 .
- the alert release threshold TH3 is set to the alert lower threshold TH1 for the alert lower threshold TH1. What is necessary is just to set to a value larger than TH1.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal by referring to the attention release threshold TH3 after determining that the state of the mechanical device 3 is attention.
- the alert release threshold TH3 may be provided separately for the alert upper threshold TH2 and the alert lower threshold TH1, or one common value may be provided.
- the time required for the measurement value TH to continue to be equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3, which is necessary for making the determination to cancel the alert can be appropriately set according to the measurement target. For example, it may be set according to the frequency of maintenance work on the measurement target. If the maintenance of the measurement target is performed once a day, if the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the measurement target is caution for at least one day, it is possible to confirm that the state of the measurement target is cautionary at the time of maintenance. .
- the timing at which the transition to the operation state or the operation stop state may be canceled may be performed, or may be canceled at the timing when the two transitions are confirmed. Is also good. Note that it is desirable to use the alert release threshold TH3 also when the determination unit 11 determines the state of the measurement target using the driving state and the driving stop state.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of still another determination processing S2 according to the present embodiment, focusing on transition to the operation state or the operation stop state.
- the determining unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper threshold TH2 or whether the measured value TH is smaller than the alert lower threshold TH1 in order to determine whether or not the alert is within the alert threshold range. (S10).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is normal (S11). When the determination result is normal (S11: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to caution and ends the determination process S2. When the determination result is not normal (S11: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S2 as it is.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is caution (S13). If the determination result is caution (S13: YES), it is determined whether the operating state has transitioned (S25).
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to normal (S17), ends the determination processing S2, and when the operating state does not transition (S25: NO), the determination unit 11 remains as it is.
- the determination processing S2 ends. If the determination result is not cautionary (S13: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S2.
- the confirmation of the two transitions confirms that the alert release threshold value TH3 or less is maintained in both the operation state and the operation stop state. Therefore, it is possible to release the alert after confirming that the alert can be released in any of the driving states.
- the timing at which the operating state has transitioned may be set as the timing to cancel, or the timing may be canceled at the timing when it is confirmed that all the operating states have changed.
- the value of the alert release threshold value TH3 or less continues in all operating states, and therefore, the release of the alert in any driving state It is preferable to be able to release the alert after confirming that it is possible.
- the determination result is set normally when the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 during the period P.
- the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal based on a local change that is a change within a predetermined period due to the lapse of time of the measured value TH.
- the configuration of the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, and a description thereof will be omitted.
- FIG. 8 shows graphs 31 and 32 showing the change over time of the measured value TH measured by the monitoring unit 15 for the mechanical device 3.
- the temperature of the mechanical device 3 changes with the influence of the temperature of the surrounding environment and the use of the mechanical device 3. Since the mechanical device 3 cannot operate normally depending on the temperature, a temperature range in which normal operation is possible is set, and the temperature is constantly measured during use, and the temperature is within the temperature range in which normal operation is possible. Need to be confirmed.
- the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time.
- the alert lower limit threshold value TH11 is a threshold value indicating a lower limit value of the temperature under normal operating conditions for the machine device 3 to operate normally.
- the alert upper limit threshold TH12 is a threshold indicating the upper limit of the temperature under the normal operation condition. If the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the alert lower threshold TH11 and equal to or less than the alert upper threshold TH12, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the alert release threshold TH13 is a threshold for canceling the alert, and is used when the state of the measurement target is determined to be caution by the state determination device 1 and then determined to be normal. Note that the alert release threshold TH13, which is a criterion for canceling the alert, is set to a value smaller than the alert upper threshold TH12.
- the measured value TH exceeds the alert upper limit threshold value TH12 at the time T11 and is out of the range of the temperature under the normal operating condition.
- the measured value TH becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold value TH13.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert release threshold TH13 again, and after time T13, the measured value TH changes before and after the alert release threshold TH13.
- the alert release threshold TH13 is exceeded but the alert upper limit threshold TH12 is maintained. ing. However, since the measured value TH in the graph 31 vibrates up and down over time, it is not unlikely that the measured value TH will become larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH12 again.
- the state determination device 1 is a change within a predetermined period of time of the measured value TH after the measured value TH becomes lower than the alert release threshold TH13 after the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH12.
- the state of the mechanical device 3 is determined based on the local change.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is Judge as normal.
- the state determination device 1 keeps determining that the state of the mechanical device 3 is caution.
- the measured value TH is the local maximum value TH_LMAX at the time T14 and is larger than the alert release threshold TH13. Therefore, at the time T14, the state determination device 1 keeps the state of the mechanical device 3 determined to be caution.
- the measured value TH in the graph 32 becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH12 at the time T11, becomes less than the alert release threshold TH13 at the time T12, and changes from the alert release threshold TH13 or less after the time T12. doing.
- the measured value TH has the maximum value TH_LMAX at the time T15 after the time T12, and the maximum value TH_LMAX at the time T15 is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal after the local maximum value TH_LMAX becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13, it is unlikely that the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert release threshold TH13 again. This is desirable in the present embodiment.
- the state determination device 1 may determine the release of the alert based on the first and second two maximum values TH_LMAX. As shown in the graph 32, the measurement value TH records the first maximum value TH_LMAX at time T15, and then records the second maximum value TH_LMAX at time T16. It is as follows.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal, and the alert is released. Is done.
- the state determination device 1 makes a determination based on the two local maximum values TH_LMAX, the possibility that the measured value TH becomes larger than TH13 again after the determination is further higher than in the case where the determination is performed based on the first local maximum value TH_LMAX. Since the alert can be released in a low state, this embodiment is preferable.
- the local maximum value TH_LMAX may frequently occur in a short time.
- the maximum value TH_LMAX indicated by the measurement value TH in which the influence of the error or the noise is reduced by averaging the measurement value TH or the like the measurement value itself in which the influence of the error or the noise is reduced is used.
- the state determination device 1 can determine the state of the mechanical device 3 based on the indicated fluctuation characteristics.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination process S30 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S30 is the same as in the first embodiment, and a description thereof will not be repeated.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper threshold TH12 or whether the measured value TH is smaller than the alert lower threshold TH11 in order to determine whether or not the alert threshold is within the range. (S31).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is normal (S32). If the determination result is normal (S32: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to caution (S33) and ends the determination process S30. When the determination result is not normal (S32: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S30 as it is.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13 (S34). If the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13 (S34: YES), the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is caution (S35). If the determination result is caution (S35: YES), the determination unit 11 determines whether the maximum value TH_LMAX has been calculated after the maximum value calculation processing S40 described below (S36).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the maximum value TH_LMAX is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13 (S37). When TH_LMAX is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13 (S37: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to normal, and ends the determination processing S30.
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S30.
- the determination result is not cautionary (S35: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S30.
- the local maximum value has not been calculated (S36: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S30.
- the maximum value TH_LMAX is larger than the alert release threshold value TH13 (S37: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S30.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the maximum value calculation processing S40.
- the maximum value TH_LMAX is a maximum value during a predetermined time.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the previous measured value TH_OLD which is the measured value TH measured in the previous monitoring process (S41).
- the determining unit 11 determines whether or not the period P has been measured (S42). .
- the determination unit 11 starts measuring the period P (S43). If the period P has been measured (S42: NO), the determination unit 11 continues to measure the measurement value TH. The value is set to the previous measurement value TH_OLD (S44), and the local maximum value calculation processing S40 ends.
- the determining unit 11 determines whether or not the period P is equal to or more than a predetermined value (S45). When the period P is smaller than the predetermined value (S45: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the local maximum value calculation processing S40.
- the determination unit 11 sets the value of the previous measurement value TH_OLD to the maximum value TH_LMAX (S46), ends the measurement of the period P (S47), and calculates the maximum value.
- the process S40 ends.
- the alert release determination is performed based on the local maximum value TH_LMAX after the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13.
- the state determination device 1 can release the alert in a state where the possibility of returning to the state requiring attention again is sufficiently low, and the alert is not continued for a long time, It can alert and release it.
- the alert release threshold TH13 is set to a value larger than the alert lower limit threshold TH11. Based on the minimum value recorded after the measured value TH exceeds the alert release threshold TH13, the state determination device 1 performs the alert release cancellation determination. As described above, in the present embodiment, the state determination device 1 may perform the release determination of the alert by using not only the maximum value TH_LMAX but also an extreme value.
- one alert release threshold TH3, TH13 which is a threshold for release of alert
- another alert release threshold TH24 is used.
- the configuration of the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment is the same as that of the first and second embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
- FIG. 11 shows graphs 41 and 42 showing a temporal change of a measurement value TH obtained by measuring the mechanical device 3 by the monitoring unit 15.
- the temperature of the mechanical device 3 changes with the influence of the temperature of the surrounding environment and the use of the mechanical device 3. Since the mechanical device 3 cannot operate normally depending on the temperature, a temperature range in which normal operation is possible is set, and the temperature is constantly measured during use, and the temperature is within the temperature range in which normal operation is possible. Need to be confirmed.
- the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time.
- the alert lower limit threshold value TH21 is a threshold value indicating a lower limit value of the temperature under normal operating conditions for the machine device 3 to operate normally.
- the alert upper limit threshold value TH22 is a threshold value indicating the upper limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition. If the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the alert lower threshold TH21 and equal to or less than the alert upper threshold TH22, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the alert release thresholds TH23 and TH24 are thresholds for canceling the alert, and are used when the status of the measurement target is determined to be normal after the status determination device 1 determines that the status of the measurement target is caution.
- the alert release threshold TH23 is smaller than the alert upper threshold TH22, and the alert release threshold TH24 is greater than the alert lower threshold TH21 and smaller than the alert release threshold TH23.
- the alert release threshold TH24 indicates one value when the measurement target is in a normal state, and is, for example, an intermediate value between the alert lower threshold TH21 and the alert upper threshold TH22 (the alert lower threshold TH21 and the alert lower). The value obtained by adding the upper limit threshold value TH22 and halving the sum). Note that the alert release threshold TH24 does not necessarily need to be an intermediate value, and may be any value as long as the state determination device 1 does not need to pay attention to the measurement target and can determine that it is normal.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH22 at time T21, and becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 at time T22.
- the value has changed to a value equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 without being equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24, but has changed to a value close to the alert release threshold TH23 after time T22.
- the alert release threshold TH23 may be set to a value sufficiently smaller than the alert upper limit threshold TH22.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the measurement target is normal after being determined to be caution). There is a possibility that the state determination device 1 may continue to determine the state of the mechanical device 3 as being unnecessarily.
- the alert release threshold TH24 is set to a value smaller than the alert release threshold TH23 separately from the alert release threshold TH23, and the state in which the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 for a predetermined time continues.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the measurement target is normal.
- the measured value TH becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH22 at the time T21, becomes less than the alert release threshold TH23 at the time T22, and becomes less than the alert release threshold TH24 at the time T23.
- the measured value TH has been changed to a value equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 after the time T22.
- the measured value TH of the graph 42 is different from the measured value TH of the graph 41 in that the measured value TH of the graph 42 is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24 after the time T23. It can be said that the value has decreased to a value sufficiently smaller than TH22.
- the measurement value TH in the graph 42 is, for example, a value equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 for a predetermined time from time T22 to time T23 and is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24. It is determined that the state of the measurement target is normal.
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S50 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S50 is the same as that of the first and second embodiments, and thus the description is omitted.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper threshold TH22 or whether the measured value TH is smaller than the alert lower threshold TH21 in order to determine whether or not the alert threshold is within the range. (S51).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is normal (S52). When the determination result is normal (S52: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to caution (S53), and ends the determination process S50. When the determination result is not normal (S52: NO), the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S50 as it is.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 (S54). If the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 (S54: YES), the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination result is caution (S55). When the determination result is caution (S55: YES), it is determined whether or not the period P for measuring the predetermined time has been measured (S56).
- the determination unit 11 starts measuring the period P (S57), and if the period P has already been measured (S56: NO), the measurement is continued. It is determined whether the value TH is greater than the alert release threshold TH24 (S58).
- the measured value TH is larger than the alert release threshold TH24 (S58: YES)
- the flag F is set (S59)
- the period P is set. It is determined whether the value is equal to or more than a predetermined value (S60).
- the flag F is information for storing information indicating whether or not the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24.
- 1 is set to the flag F, and when the flag F is reset. Is set to 0 in the flag F. Note that the flag F is set to 0 when the state determination device 1 is initialized.
- the flag F When the flag F is set to 1, it indicates that the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24 at least once during the measurement of the period P. When the flag F is set to 0, it indicates that the measurement value TH has never become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24 during the measurement of the period P.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the flag F is set (S61). When the flag F is set (S61: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to normal (S62), ends the measurement of the period P (S63), resets the flag F (S64), and determines The process S50 ends.
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S50.
- the flag F is not set (S61: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination processing S50.
- the measured value TH is larger than the alert release threshold TH23 (S54: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the measurement of the period P (S63), resets the flag F (S64), and ends the determination process S50.
- the determination result is not cautionary (S55: NO)
- the determination unit 11 ends the measurement of the period P (S63), resets the flag F (S64), and ends the determination process S50.
- the state determination device 1 sets the alert release threshold TH23, which is a criterion for canceling the alert, to a value smaller than the alert upper threshold TH22.
- the alert release threshold TH24 is set to a value smaller than the alert release threshold TH23.
- the alert release threshold TH23 is also different.
- the alert release threshold TH24 may be set.
- the alert release threshold TH23 is set to a value larger than the alert lower threshold TH21, and the alert release threshold TH24 is set to a value greater than the alert release threshold TH23.
- the state determination device 1 performs the alert release determination based on whether or not the alert value is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24.
- the state determination device 1 in a state where the possibility that the mechanical device 3 returns to the state requiring attention again is sufficiently low, the state determination device 1 can determine to release the alert. Further, in the present embodiment, since the alert release threshold TH23 does not need to be set too strictly, the state determination device 1 determines the state of the mechanical device 3 as being unnecessarily continued for an unnecessarily long time (alert). ) It is possible to alert and release the alert without continuing.
- FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing a configuration of the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment.
- the nonvolatile memory 7 in addition to the configuration of the first to third embodiments, further includes a determination information database unit 46 and an output database unit 47.
- the determination value database unit 45 is different from the alert upper limit threshold TH32 used by the determiner 11 when making a determination, and is a value of another alert upper limit threshold TH33. (For example, 30).
- the judgment information database unit 46 holds a judgment information table TB12 shown in FIG. 14 that holds judgment information different from judgment results directly linked to the output output from the judgment result output unit.
- the determination information is information based on the measurement result before the previous time, and is, for example, four pieces of information: alert stop (STOP), alert start (START), alert ongoing (CONTINING), and alert release (CANCEL). .
- the determination information is, for example, information on setting or canceling the alert for the measurement target.
- the output database unit 47 holds information for output that holds a measured value for each time, a determination result, and determination information, as in an output table TB13 illustrated in FIG. In the example of FIG. 14, at time T31, the measured value is 45, the determination result is caution, and the determination information is a warning start.
- the measured value is 20, the determination result is normal, and the determination information indicates that the alert is being continued.
- the measured value becomes 35, the judgment result becomes caution, and the judgment information indicates that attention is being continued.
- the measured value becomes 20
- the determination result becomes normal
- the determination information indicates that the alert is released.
- the measured value becomes 35, the determination result becomes normal, and the determination information indicates that the alert is stopped.
- FIG. 15 shows a graph 51 showing a temporal change of a measured value TH obtained by measuring the mechanical device 3 by the monitoring unit 15.
- the temperature of the mechanical device 3 changes with the influence of the temperature of the surrounding environment and the use of the mechanical device 3. Since the mechanical device 3 cannot operate normally depending on the temperature, a temperature range in which normal operation is possible is set, and the temperature is constantly measured during use, and the temperature is within the temperature range in which normal operation is possible. Need to be confirmed.
- the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time.
- the alert lower limit threshold value TH31 is a threshold value indicating the lower limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition for the machine device 3 to operate normally.
- the alert upper limit threshold value TH32 is a threshold value indicating the upper limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition. If the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the alert lower threshold TH31 and equal to or less than the alert upper threshold TH32, the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the alert upper limit threshold TH33 is a value smaller than the alert upper limit threshold TH32, and replaces the alert upper limit threshold TH32 when the determination information for the measurement target of the state determination device 1 is alerting start and alerting ongoing. Is a threshold value indicating the upper limit value of the temperature under normal operating conditions.
- the measurement value width in which the state of the measurement target is determined to be alert by the state determination device 1 is not ( (When alerting is stopped and alerting is canceled). Since the measurement value range in which the state of the measurement target is determined to be caution is widened, the measurement result of the measurement target by the state determination device 1 is easily determined to be caution.
- the state determination device 1 determines the state of the mechanical device 3 as being alert, and sets the determination information to be alert initiation.
- the state determination device 1 compares the measured value TH with the alert upper limit threshold value TH33, and determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal because the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold value TH33. It should be noted that the state determination device 1 sets the alerting continuation because the period P used for the determination of the determination information is not longer than the predetermined time, for example.
- the measured value TH remains at the time T33 because the period P is not equal to or greater than the predetermined value.
- the arousal upper threshold TH33 is used. Since the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH33, the state determination device 1 determines the state of the mechanical device 3 to be caution.
- the measured value TH becomes the alert release because the period P has become equal to or more than the predetermined value, and the alert upper limit threshold TH32 is used as the threshold indicating the upper limit of the temperature under the normal operation condition.
- the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold value TH32, so the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal.
- the measured value TH is the alert release in the determination state
- the alert upper limit threshold TH32 is used as the threshold indicating the upper limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition.
- the measured value TH is equal to or lower than the alert upper limit threshold value TH32, so the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the mechanical device 3 is normal. Since the alert release continues as the determination information, the state determination device 1 sets the determination information to the alert stop.
- the determination result of the state determination device 1 at the time T33 and the T time 35 of the measured value TH in the graph 51 indicates that, although the measured value TH is the same value (35 in the output table TB13 in FIG. 14), attention is paid to each. It is normal.
- the alert upper limit threshold TH33 is used at time T33, and the alert upper limit threshold TH32 is used at time T35, and the determination of the determination result is performed. This is because the thresholds used are different.
- alert upper limit thresholds TH32 and TH33 which are the criteria for determining the determination result in accordance with the determination information, even if the measurement values are the same, it is more important that the alert information continues to be alerted. It is easier for the state determination device 1 to determine that the determination result is caution than when the arousal is stopped.
- the determination result is again noted by the state determination device 1. Probability is high.
- FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S70 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S70 is the same as in the first to third embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper threshold TH32 or whether the measured value TH is smaller than the alert lower threshold TH31 to determine whether or not the alert threshold is within the range. (S71).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the alert information is stopping alert or canceling alert (S72). Note that the determination information is set such that the alert is stopped as an initial value at the time of initialization of the state determination device 1 or the like, and is set again, for example, at the start of alert or during the ongoing alert at step S73 or step S77 described later. You.
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination information to the start of the alert (S73), and sets the determination result to the attention (S74). S70 ends.
- the determination unit 11 ends the determination process S70 as it is.
- the determining unit 11 determines whether the alert information is the alert start or alert ongoing (S75). When the determination information is not the start of the alert or the alert is not continued (S75: NO), the determination unit 11 determines whether the determination information is the release of the alert (S86), and when the determination information is the release of the alert (S87: YES), the determination information is set to stop alerting (S87), and the determination processing S80 ends. If the judgment information is not the alert release (S86: NO), the judging unit 11 ends the judgment processing S70 as it is.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the alert information is the continuation of the alert (S76), and when the determination information is the continuation of the alert, It is set that the alert is ongoing in the determination information (S77).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold value TH33 (S78). When the measured value TH is equal to or smaller than the alert upper limit threshold TH33 (S78: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result to normal, and when the measured value TH is larger than the alert upper limit threshold TH33 (S78: NO), the determiner 11 sets the judgment result carefully.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the period P has not been measured (S81). If the period P has not been measured (S81: YES), the measurement unit 11 starts measuring the period P (S82).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the period P is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (S83). If the period P is smaller than the predetermined value (S83: NO), the determination processing S70 ends. When the period P is equal to or longer than the predetermined value (S83: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination information to the alert release (S84), ends the measurement of the period P (S85), and ends the determination process S70.
- FIG. 17 is a conceptual diagram showing an output result 60 output by the determination result output unit 16 according to the present embodiment.
- the output result 60 includes a graph display unit 61, a time-lapse result display unit 62, and a determination result display unit 63.
- the graph display section 61 displays a change in the measured value TH with the passage of time as a graph.
- the aging result display unit 62 displays the contents of the output table TB13 as a table.
- the determination result display section 63 displays the determination result as characters.
- the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment can quickly determine that the determination result is attention again by setting the strict determination criteria.
- the state determination device 1 according to the present embodiment can output the determination information to grasp the current state of the measurement target and allow the user of the state determination device 1 and its related persons to appropriately understand the determination result. It becomes possible.
- the alert upper limit threshold TH33 is different from the alert release thresholds TH13, TH23, TH24 in the first to third embodiments.
- the determination as in the first to third embodiments may be performed simultaneously with the present embodiment. However, there are cases where the alert upper limit threshold value TH33 matches the alert alert release threshold values TH13, TH23, and TH24.
- the lower alert threshold TH31 is also larger than the alert lower threshold TH31. 'Etc. may be provided.
- the alert lower limit threshold TH31 ' is a threshold indicating the lower limit value of the temperature in the normal operating condition instead of the alert lower threshold TH31 when the determination information for the measurement target of the state determination device 1 is alert start and alert ongoing. It is.
- the state determination device 1 determines the state of the measurement target based on the measurement value of one measurement target.
- the state determination device 1 measures by changing the alert upper limit threshold WL3 based on the measurement value WL_U of another measurement target different from the measurement target in addition to the measurement value WL_L of the measurement target. Determine the state of the target.
- the configuration of the state determination device 1 in this embodiment is the same as that of the first to fourth embodiments, but the monitoring device 2 measures not the temperature of the mechanical device 3 but, for example, the water levels at a plurality of points in a river.
- FIG. 18 shows a graph 71 showing the measured value WL_U of the observation point A upstream of the river and a graph 72 showing the measured value WL_L of the observation point B downstream of the river.
- the vertical axis represents the water level and the horizontal axis represents the time, and the horizontal axes of the graphs 71 and 72 are shown to match.
- the alert upper limit threshold WL1 is a threshold for determining that the water level at the observation point A is normal by the state determination device 1.
- the alert release threshold WL2 is a threshold at which the alert is released at the observation point A, and is used when the state determination device 1 determines that the water level state at the observation point A is normal after being determined to be caution. This is a threshold.
- the alert upper limit threshold WL3 is a threshold at which the water level at the observation point B is determined to be normal by the state determination device 1.
- the alert release threshold WL4 is a threshold at which the alert is released at the observation point B, and is used when the state of the observation point B is determined to be normal after the state of the observation point B is determined to be caution by the state determination device 1. is there.
- the alert release threshold WL5 is used when the water level at the observation point A is determined to be normal by the state determination device 1 and when the state of the water level at the observation point B is determined to be normal by the state determination device 1 Is the threshold used for Note that the alert release threshold WL5 is larger than the alert release threshold WL4.
- the measured value WL_U becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold WL1 at the time T41, becomes less than the alert release threshold WL2 at the time T43, and changes to be less than the alert release threshold WL2 after the time T43.
- the measured value WL_L becomes larger than the alert release threshold WL4 at time T42, becomes lower than the alert release threshold WL4 at time T45, and changes to be lower than the alert release threshold WL4 after time T45.
- the measured value WL_L is larger than the alert release threshold WL4, and the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the water level at the observation point B is caution.
- the measured value WL_U is equal to or less than the alert release threshold WL2, and the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the water level at the observation point A is normal. This shows that the water level at the downstream observation point B is rising, but the water level at the upstream observation point A is falling.
- the measured value WL_L of the downstream observation point B decreases and the measured value WL_U decreases after time T43, similarly to the measurement value WL_U of the upstream observation point A. It is highly likely that they will
- the state determination device 1 changes the alert release threshold WL4 for the measurement value WL_L of the downstream observation point B, and at an appropriate timing, the state determination device 1 After the state of the water level is determined to be caution, it can be determined to be normal.
- the measured value WL_U of the upstream observation point A has decreased to the alert release threshold WL2 or less after the time T43, and the necessity to pay attention to the flooding of the river also decreases at the observation point B downstream. it seems to do. Therefore, the alert release threshold WL4 is changed to the alert release threshold WL5, and the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the water level at the observation point B is normal even if the measured value WL_L is relatively high.
- the state determination device 1 can determine the state of the water level of the observation point B to be normal earlier than in the case where the alert release threshold WL5 is not changed. The determination device 1 does not continue to determine the state of the water level at the observation point B as being caution.
- the measured value WL_U at the upstream observation point A may increase with time. Is high.
- the alert release threshold WL4 is set to a smaller value so as to be a strict condition, so that the state determination device 1 can easily determine the state of the water level of the observation point B as being caution.
- FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S100 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S100 is the same as in the first to fourth embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the measured value WL_U is equal to or less than the alert release threshold WL2 (S101), and if the result is affirmative (S101: YES), sets the alert release threshold WL5 as the fluctuation threshold WLV (S102). In the case of a negative result (S101: NO), the alert release threshold WL4 is set as the fluctuation threshold WLV (S103).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the measured value WL_L is equal to or less than the fluctuation threshold WLV (S104). If the determination is affirmative (S104: YES), the determination result at the downstream observation point B is set to normal (S105). Then, the determination processing S100 ends. If the determination in step S104 is negative (S104: NO), the determination result at the downstream observation point B is set to caution (S106), and the determination process S100 ends.
- Another example of the present embodiment is a case where displacements at a plurality of points due to crustal deformation are measured.
- the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 of the respective measurement targets are set based on the relative measurement value D_R of the measurement value D_C of the measurement target and the measurement value D_D of the other measurement target. Good.
- alert release thresholds DCV1 and DCV2 are used when the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined to be normal after the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined by the state determination device 1.
- alert release thresholds DDV1 and DDV2 are thresholds used when the state of the displacement of the observation point D is determined to be normal after the state of the displacement of the observation point D is determined by the state determination device 1.
- FIG. 20 shows a graph 81 showing the measured value D_C of the observation point C, a graph 82 showing the measured value D_D of the observation point D, and a graph 83 showing the relative value D_R of the observation point C and the observation point D. It is assumed that the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D may be interlocked with each other.
- the vertical axis represents displacement and the horizontal axis represents time, and the horizontal axes of the graphs 81, 82, and 83 are shown to match.
- a case where the amount of displacement (hereinafter, this may be referred to as fluctuation) is small is a normal state at observation points C and D, and fluctuation at observation points C and D is large. It is assumed that the situation requires more attention to an earthquake.
- the alert lower limit threshold D1 is a threshold indicating a lower limit when the state determination device 1 determines that the state of displacement of the observation point C is normal
- the alert upper limit threshold D2 is an alert upper limit threshold D2. Is a threshold value indicating the upper limit when it is determined that the displacement state is normal.
- the alert reference threshold D3 is an intermediate value or a value near the intermediate value between the alert lower threshold D1 and the alert upper threshold D2, which is a reference value. As the measured value D_C is closer to the alert reference threshold D3, It is assumed that the state of displacement of the observation point C is close to the state that should be originally (normal).
- the alert release threshold D10 is a threshold for which the measured value D_C becomes a value greater than the alert upper limit threshold D2 and the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined to be normal after the state determination device 1 determines that the state of displacement is caution. (It is set to the alert release threshold DCV1 as described later).
- the alert release threshold D11 is a threshold for determining that the measured value D_C is smaller than the alert lower limit threshold D1 and that the state of the displacement of the observation point C is normal after the state determination device 1 determines that the state of displacement is caution. (It is set to the alert release threshold DCV2 as described later).
- the alert lower limit threshold D4 is a threshold indicating the lower limit when the state determination device 1 determines that the state of displacement of the observation point D is normal
- the alert upper limit threshold D5 is that the state determination device 1 uses the observation point D. Is a threshold value indicating the upper limit when it is determined that the displacement state is normal.
- the alert reference threshold D6 is an intermediate value between the alert lower threshold D4 and the alert upper threshold D5 or a value near the intermediate value, which is a reference value. As the measured value D_D is closer to the alert reference threshold D6, It is assumed that the state of displacement of the observation point D is close to the state that should be originally (normal).
- the alert release threshold value D14 is a threshold value at which the measured value D_D becomes greater than the alert upper limit threshold value D5 and the state determination device 1 determines that the displacement state of the observation point D is normal after the state of the displacement is determined to be attention (
- the alert release threshold value DDV1 is set as described below.
- the alert release threshold D15 is a threshold for determining that the measured value D_D is smaller than the alert lower limit threshold D4 and that the state of the displacement of the observation point D is normal after the state determination device 1 determines that the state of displacement is caution (described later). Is set to the alert release threshold DDV2 as shown in FIG.
- the measured value D_C of the graph 81 in FIG. 20 is a value equal to or more than the alert lower threshold D1 and equal to or less than the alert upper threshold D2 and is within the alert threshold. It can be said that the state of displacement of the observation point C is normal.
- the measured value D_D of the graph 82 in FIG. 20 is a value equal to or more than the alert lower limit threshold D4 and equal to or less than the alert upper limit threshold D6 and is within the alert threshold. Therefore, it can be said that the state of displacement of the observation point D is normal.
- the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D are observation points that may be interlocked, and the relative displacement between the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D must also be noted. In this case, it is necessary to evaluate the relative value of the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D.
- ⁇ ⁇ Relative value D_R in graph 83 in FIG. 20 indicates the relative displacement of observation point C as viewed from observation point D.
- the alert reference threshold D9 is a value obtained by subtracting the alert reference threshold D3 from the alert reference threshold D6, and the alert lower limit threshold D7 is the difference between the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D by the state determination device 1. This is a threshold value indicating the lower limit when the relative value is determined to be normal.
- the alert upper limit threshold D8 is a threshold indicating the upper limit when the state determination device 1 determines that the relative value between the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D is normal.
- the measured value D_C and the measured value D_D change so as to be separated from each other, so that the relative value D_R of the graph 83 increases with the passage of time. It becomes larger than D8.
- the state of displacement of the observation point C and the state of displacement of the observation point D can be said to be normal when attention is paid only to individual displacements, but care must be taken when attention is paid to relative displacements. I can say.
- alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 are set based on the logical relationship.
- the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 for the measured values D_C and D_D may be set strictly as the alert release thresholds D12, D13, D16, and D17 instead of the alert release thresholds D10, D11, D14, and D15. .
- alert release thresholds D10 and D14 are thresholds for canceling the determination result of the alert when the measured values D_C and D_D exceed the alert upper limit thresholds D2 and D5.
- the alert release thresholds D12 and D16 need to be smaller than the alert release thresholds D10 and D14. There is.
- the alert release thresholds D11 and D15 are thresholds for canceling the determination result of the alert when the measured values D_C and D_D exceed the alert lower limit thresholds D1 and D4.
- the alert release thresholds D13 and D17 need to be larger than the alert release thresholds D11 and D15. There is.
- FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination processes S110, S120, and S130 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processes other than the determination processes S110, S120, and S130 are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
- the determination unit 11 calculates the determination result of the relative value D_R in the determination process S110, outputs the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point C based on the determination result of the relative value D_R in the determination process S120, and outputs the determination result in the determination process S130.
- the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point D is output based on the determination result of the relative value D_R.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the relative value D_R is greater than the alert upper threshold D8 or whether the relative value D_R is less than the alert lower threshold D7 (S111).
- step S111 If the result of step S111 is affirmative (S111: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the determination result of the relative value D_R to caution (S112), and ends the determination process S110. If step S112 is negative (S111: NO), the determination unit sets the determination result of the relative value D_R to normal (S113), and ends the determination processing S110.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the determination result of the relative value D_R is set to attention (S121). If step S121 is a positive result (S121: YES), the determination unit 11 sets the alert release threshold D12 as the alert release threshold DCV1, and sets the alert release threshold D13 as the alert release threshold DCV2 (S122).
- step S121 is a negative result (S121: NO)
- the determination unit 11 sets an alert release threshold D10 as the alert release threshold DCV1, and sets an alert release threshold D11 as the alert release threshold DCV2 (S123).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value DC is equal to or less than the alert release threshold DCV1 or whether the measured value DC is equal to or greater than the alert release threshold DCV2 (S124).
- step S124 is a positive result (S124: YES)
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point C to normal (S125), and ends the determination process S120.
- step S124 is a negative result (S124: NO)
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point C to caution (S126), and ends the determination processing S120.
- the determination unit 11 determines whether or not the determination result of the relative value D_R is set to caution (S131).
- step S131 is a positive result (S131: YES)
- the determination unit 11 sets the alert release threshold DV1 to the alert release threshold D16, and sets the alert release threshold DV2 to the alert release threshold D17 (S132).
- step S131 is a negative result (S131: NO)
- the determination unit 11 sets the alert release threshold D14 as the alert release threshold DDV1, and sets the alert release threshold D15 as the alert release threshold DDV2 (S133).
- the determination unit 11 determines whether the measured value D_D is equal to or less than the alert release threshold DDV1, or whether the measured value D_D is equal to or greater than the alert release threshold DDV2 (S134).
- step S134 is a positive result (S134: YES)
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point D to normal (S135), and ends the determination processing S120.
- step S134 is a negative result (S134: NO)
- the determination unit 11 sets the determination result of the displacement state of the observation point D to caution (S136), and ends the determination processing S120.
- the threshold may be changed in consideration of displacement in a direction different from the direction in which measurement is performed. For example, a case where a displacement of a certain observation point on the ground surface is observed will be described as an example.
- the observation point may be displaced not only in the ground plane but also in the direction perpendicular to the ground plane, even if the displacement in the ground plane is small, it will be displaced in the direction perpendicular to the ground plane. May cause a situation that requires attention.
- the threshold for determination may be changed based on the displacement in the ground plane.
- the alert upper limit threshold WL3 and the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, DDV2 are changed based on the measurement value of another measurement object different from the measurement object. It can alert and release it.
- alerts that require alerting alerts that require minor alerts, warnings that require severe alerts, and abnormalities that require immediate attention. Attention information, warning information, and abnormality information may be output.
- an alert upper threshold and an alert lower threshold are set for the alert state
- an alert upper threshold and an alert lower threshold are set for the alert status
- an alert alert lower threshold is set for the alert status.
- an abnormality occurrence upper limit threshold and an abnormality occurrence lower limit threshold may be set.
- the alert release threshold is used to release the caution state
- the warning notification release threshold is used to release the warning state
- the abnormality release threshold is used to release the abnormal state May be performed.
- the elapsed time from the normal state to the release is made longer in the case of the warning state than in the case of the caution state.
- the state is not released over time, and is released after confirming that a predetermined response for correcting the abnormal state has been completed. This is preferable because the abnormal state is not erroneously released.
- the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 are changed based on the relative value D_R. However, attention is required depending on the duration or the number of recordings in which the measured value is equal to or greater than the alert upper limit threshold.
- the arousal release threshold may be changed.
- the state determination device 1 determines that the state of the measurement target is alert. However, the measured value soon becomes equal to or lower than the alert upper threshold and may be further equal to or less than the alert release threshold.
- the measured value temporarily exceeds the alert upper limit threshold value due to a measurement error or measurement noise. Also, during a long period of time, the measured value does not become larger than the alert upper limit threshold, so it is considered that the possibility that the measurement target is in a state to be careful is not high.
- the cause is unlikely to be the influence of errors, noise, etc. It is likely that the state should be high. Therefore, by changing the alerting state release threshold according to the duration of the state where the measured value is greater than the alerting threshold, processing suitable for the situation is realized.
- the longer the duration of the state where the measured value is larger than the alerting threshold the lower the alerting state release threshold, so that it is difficult for the state determination device 1 to cancel the attention determination.
- the higher the possibility that the state of the measurement target should be noted the more difficult it is for the state determination device 1 to cancel the determination of the attention.
- the state determination apparatus 1 does not needlessly continue to determine that there is caution.
- the effect of errors and noise is large, and although the measured value continues to be larger than the alert threshold except for a part, the measured value is less than the alert threshold due to the influence of error and noise. It may be.
- the determination may be made based on the number of times the measured value has become larger than the alert threshold within a predetermined time, or the duration of a state in which the average value of the measured values within the predetermined time is equal to or more than the alert threshold. May be determined based on
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
- Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、状態判定装置、状態判定方法及び状態判定プログラムに関する。
本願は、2018年10月4日に、日本に出願された特願2018-188965に優先権を主張し、その内容をここに援用する。
The present invention relates to a state determination device, a state determination method, and a state determination program.
Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-188965 filed on October 4, 2018, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
近年、機械装置等の故障検知や事故防止、自然災害の予知を目的として、対象を検査装置や計測装置、監視カメラ等でモニタリングし、モニタリング情報に基づいて異常等を自動で検知し、ユーザに警告を通知する技術の開発が進んでいる。上述のようなモニタリング装置の例として、特許文献1には、ガスの流量計測装置38において、ガスの流量が異常判定条件に合致して異常信号を出力した後、ガスの流量が異常判定条件とは異なる異常解除条件に合致した場合に、異常解除信号を出力することで、速やかに異常状態が解除され、自動復旧する技術が記載されている。また、特許文献2には、共振タグ40を用いた電子物品監視装置100において、検知レベルL1´を超える信号を検知した場合に、検知レベルL1´より高いレベルL2´に検知レベルを設定することで、誤報による不必要な警報の発生を抑制する技術が記載されている。
In recent years, for the purpose of detecting failures of machinery and equipment, preventing accidents, and predicting natural disasters, the target is monitored with inspection equipment, measuring equipment, monitoring cameras, etc., and abnormalities etc. are automatically detected based on the monitoring information and The technology for issuing warnings is under development. As an example of the monitoring device as described above,
しかしながら、特許文献1に記載の状態判定方法は、異常解除成立値以上になった場合に異常を解除するため、計測値の変動が大きい場合に、異常状態と正常状態が短時間で繰り返される可能性がある。また、特許文献1では、所定時間経過後には異常解除条件に合致しない場合であっても自動復旧するため、異常解除可能でない状態で異常を解除する可能性がある。また、特許文献2では、検知レベルL1´を超過した場合に、検知レベルを高いレベルL2´に設定するため、本来の検知レベルL1´にて検知すべき異常状態を異常として検知しない可能性がある。
However, the state determination method described in
本発明の一つの態様は、注意が必要な状態であるにも関わらず注意喚起を解除したり、逆に、注意が必要な状態でないにも関わらず、長時間継続して注意喚起を継続したりすることがなく、より好適に注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる状態判定装置を提供することを目的とする。 One embodiment of the present invention is to cancel the alert even though the state requires attention, or conversely, to continue the alert for a long time even though the state does not require attention. It is an object of the present invention to provide a state determination device that can perform alerting and canceling the alert more appropriately without causing any trouble.
上記の課題を解決するために、本発明の一態様に係る状態判定装置は、計測対象の計測値を取得する取得部と、取得された計測値が第1の上限閾値及び下限閾値の範囲外の値となった場合に注意情報を出力する出力部とを有し、出力部は、注意情報の出力中に、計測値が所定時間の間、前記第1の上限閾値及び前記下限閾値とは異なる値に設定された第1の解除閾値の値を参照して注意情報の出力を停止する。 In order to solve the above problem, a state determination device according to an aspect of the present invention includes an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement value of a measurement target, and an acquired measurement value that is outside a range of a first upper threshold and a lower threshold. And an output unit that outputs the attention information when the value becomes the value.The output unit, during the output of the attention information, for a predetermined time during the measurement value, the first upper threshold and the lower threshold are The output of the caution information is stopped with reference to the value of the first release threshold set to a different value.
本発明の一態様によれば、注意が必要な状態であるにも関わらず注意喚起を解除したり、逆に、注意が必要な状態でないにも関わらず、長時間継続して注意喚起を継続したりすることがなく、より好適に注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる状態判定装置を提供することができる。 According to one embodiment of the present invention, the alert is released in a state that requires attention, or conversely, the alert continues for a long time even in a state that does not require attention. It is possible to provide a state determination device that can more appropriately issue a warning and release the warning without doing so.
以下、本発明の実施の形態について、図面を参照しながら説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
[第1の実施の形態]
図1に本実施の形態における状態判定装置1の構成を示すブロック図を示す。図1に示すように状態判定装置1は、モニタリング装置2から機械装置3の情報を受信する。また状態判定装置1は、機械装置3から取得した情報に基づいて機械装置3の状態を判定し、判定した判定結果に基づく情報を、通信回線などを介して判定結果出力装置4に送信する。
[First Embodiment]
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a
状態判定装置1は、例えばオープン系のサーバやメインフレームコンピュータなどのコンピュータから構成される。状態判定装置1とモニタリング装置2とは通信回線を介して接続されている。同様に状態判定装置1と判定結果出力装置4とは通信回線を介して接続されている。通信回線は、有線でも無線でもよく、公衆網を用いてもよいし、専用通信回線を用いてもよく、VPN(Virtual Private Network)のような技術を用いてもよいものとする。
The
状態判定装置1は、CPU5と揮発性メモリ6と、不揮発性メモリ7と、通信部8とを備え、互いにバスなどで接続されており、演算結果などのデータを相互に送受信している。不揮発性メモリ7は、CPU5が使用するデータを揮発性メモリ6に送信し、CPU5は、揮発性メモリ6のデータを使用して演算した演算結果を通信部8に送信する。CPU5は、通信部8を介して通信回線と通信を行う。
The
揮発性メモリ6は、RAM(Random Access Memory)などであり、不揮発性メモリ7は、HDD(Hard Disk Drive)やSSD(Solid State Drive)などである。揮発性メモリ6や不揮発性メモリ7はCPU(Central Processing Unit)であるCPU5の処理に必要なテーブルなどの各種データやプログラムなどを記憶している。揮発性メモリ6は口述の取得部10と判定部11と出力部12とを備え、不揮発性メモリ7は後述の判定値データベース部13と判定結果データベース部14とを備える。
The
モニタリング装置2は、モニタリング対象である機械装置3の状態の監視や検査や計測を行う装置であって、状態判定装置1の通信部8と通信を行うことで取得した情報を送信する。
The
モニタリング装置2は、モニタリング対象の状態の監視や検査や計測を行うためのモニタリング部15を備える。モニタリング部15がモニタリング対象から取得する情報は、モニタリング対象によって、温度、湿度、色、長さ、面積、体積、位置、流量、水位、濃度、速さ、加速度、密度、質量、電圧、電流、磁力、放射線量、照度など多岐に渡る。
The
モニタリング部15は、上述の情報を計測する装置(例えば温度計、照度計、カメラなど)で構成される。本実施の形態においては例えばモニタリング対象の温度を温度計で計測する。
The
状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を判定した判定結果に基づく情報を状態判定装置1の通信部8と通信を行うことで受信する判定結果出力装置4は、判定結果を出力する判定結果出力部16を備える。判定結果出力部16は、例えば液晶ディスプレイなどの表示装置やLEDなどの照明装置やスピーカなどの音響装置とする。
The determination
判定結果出力部16が表示装置の場合は、モニタリング対象の状態を色や文字でディスプレイに表示することで判定結果を出力する。例えばモニタリング対象の状態を色で表示する場合、判定結果が注意の場合はディスプレイの一部又は全面に黄色を表示し、判定結果が正常の場合はディスプレイの一部又は前面に青色を表示する。またモニタリング対象の状態を文字で表示する場合はディスプレイに注意や正常といった文字を表示する。
If the judgment
判定結果出力部16が照明装置の場合は、モニタリング対象の状態を照明の点灯色や照明を点滅させることで判定結果を出力する。例えばモニタリング対象の状態を照明の点灯色で表示する場合、判定結果が注意の場合は照明の点灯色を黄色とし、判定結果が正常の場合は照明の点灯色を青色とする。またモニタリング対象の状態を照明の点灯または点滅で表示する場合、判定結果が注意の場合は照明を点滅させ、判定結果が正常の場合は照明を点灯させる。
If the determination
判定結果出力部16が音響装置の場合は、モニタリング対象の状態をビープ音などの警報音を出力することで判定結果を出力する。例えば判定結果が注意の場合は音響装置からビープ音を出力し、判定結果が正常の場合は音響装置からの出力をしない。
When the determination
なお、図1では状態判定装置1にモニタリング部15を備えるモニタリング装置2と判定結果出力部16を備える判定結果出力装置とが接続された構成を示しているが、状態判定装置1がモニタリング部15と判定結果出力部16とを備える構成でもよい。
Although FIG. 1 shows a configuration in which the
状態判定装置1の内部にモニタリング部15と判定結果出力部16とを備える構成の場合は、モニタリングから判定結果の出力までの一連の処理を状態判定装置内で行うことになる。
In the case where the
なお状態判定装置1は、図1においてはCPU5、揮発性メモリ6及び不揮発性メモリ7を備える構成としているが、本実施の形態はこれに限らず取得部10、判定部11及び出力部12は専用の電子回路であってもよいものとする。
Although the
図2に判定値データベース部13が保持する判定値テーブルTB1及び判定結果データベース部14が保持する判定結果テーブルTB2の概念図を示す。判定値テーブルTB1は、判定部11が判定の際に使用する注意喚起下限閾値(以下、これを下限閾値と呼んでもよい)TH1、注意喚起上限閾値(以下これを上限閾値と呼んでもよい)TH2及び注意喚起解除閾値(以下これを解除閾値と呼んでもよい)TH3の値である10,40,20を保持する。
FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram of the judgment value table TB1 held by the judgment
注意喚起下限閾値TH1、注意喚起上限閾値TH2及び注意喚起解除閾値TH3の値は、状態判定装置1の初期化時に設定されるものとする。なお状態判定装置1の稼働中に設定ツールなどを用いることによって注意喚起下限閾値TH1、注意喚起上限閾値TH2及び注意喚起解除閾値TH3の値を変更できるようにしてもよいものとする。
The values of the alert lower limit threshold TH1, the alert upper limit threshold TH2, and the alert release threshold TH3 are set when the
判定結果テーブルTB2は出力方法を指定する値を保持する。本実施の形態においては判定結果テーブルTB2に示すように判定結果は測定対象に対して注意が不要な状態であることを示す正常(NORMAL)と測定対象に対して注意が必要な状態であることを示す注意(CAUTION)の2種類としている。 The determination result table TB2 holds a value designating the output method. In the present embodiment, as shown in the determination result table TB2, the determination result indicates a state in which attention is not required for the measurement target. Normal (NORMAL) and a state in which attention is required for the measurement target. (CAUTION).
図3にモニタリング部15が機械装置3を計測した計測値THの経時変化を示すグラフ21~24を示す。機械装置3の温度は、周囲環境の温度の影響や機械装置3の使用に伴い変化する。機械装置3は、温度によっては正常に運転することができないため、正常運転が可能な温度範囲が設定されていて、使用中は常時温度が計測され、正常運転が可能な温度範囲内であることが確認される必要がある。
グ ラ フ FIG. 3 shows
図3では、縦軸で温度を表し横軸で時刻を表している。注意喚起下限閾値TH1は機械装置3が正常に運転するための正常運転条件の温度の下限値を示す閾値である。また注意喚起上限閾値TH2は正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値である。注意喚起解除閾値TH3は注意喚起を解除する閾値であって、状態判定装置1によって計測対象の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH1以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下であれば状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。
In FIG. 3, the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time. The alert lower limit threshold value TH1 is a threshold value indicating the lower limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition for the
グラフ21に示すように計測値THは、時刻T1において注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり正常運転条件の温度の範囲外となっており、時刻T2で計測値THが再び注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下となり正常運転範囲内の温度に戻っている。
As shown in the
状態判定装置1は、時刻T1で計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなったため、機械装置3の状態は注意と判定する。判定結果出力装置4は、状態判定装置1から受信する判定結果である注意情報に基づいて注意情報を出力する。
Since the measured value TH has become larger than the alert upper limit threshold value TH2 at time T1, the
注意情報の出力の停止又は注意情報の出力の代わりに正常情報を出力する際の状態判定装置1の処理について経時変化による計測値THを示すグラフ22~グラフ24を用いて説明する。
The processing of the
グラフ22に示すように計測値THは、時刻T1において注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり、時刻T2でTH2以下となり、時刻T3で再び注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなっている。グラフ22に示した計測値THのように、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなってから注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった場合においても、短期間で計測値THが再度注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなる可能性がある。
As shown in the
このため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった直後は、再度注意が必要な状態となる可能性が低くないため、注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった時点では状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定せずに所定時間の間注意と判定していることが好ましい。
For this reason, immediately after the measured value TH falls below the alert upper limit threshold value TH2, the possibility that the state needs to be watched again is not low. Therefore, when the alert value falls below the alert upper limit threshold value TH2, the
なお計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった時点で状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する場合、短時間で判定結果出力装置4が注意情報の出力と正常情報の出力を繰り返す可能性がある。このような観点からも状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を所定時間の間正常と判定せずに注意と判定していることが好ましい。
If the
またグラフ23に示すように計測値THは、時刻T1において注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり、時刻T2で注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下となり、時刻T2以降は、注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下で推移している。グラフ22とは異なりグラフ23において計測値THは、一度注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった後は、一定期間、例えば、時刻T2から時刻T4まで再度注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなってない。
Further, as shown in the
しかし、グラフ23において計測値THは、時刻T2以降も注意喚起上限閾値TH2付近の値を計測しており、計測値THの経時による微小な変化によって再度注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなる可能性が低くない。このため、グラフ23において計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった状態が所定時間継続していても、状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定せずに注意と判定していることが好ましい。
However, in the
グラフ23において計測値THは、注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった場合も継続して注意喚起上限閾値TH2付近の値となる可能性がある。このため状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を正常と判定するために注意喚起上限閾値TH2以外の判定基準が設けられることが好ましい。このため本発明の一態様では、注意喚起上限閾値TH2とは別に、注意喚起上限閾値TH2より小さな値である注意喚起解除閾値TH3を設定することが好ましい。
に お い て In the
グラフ24に示すように計測値THは、時刻T1において注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり、時刻T2で注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下となる。またグラフ24の計測値THは、時刻T5で注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下となり、時刻T6で再度注意喚起解除閾値TH3より大きくなり、時刻T6以降は、注意喚起解除閾値TH3より大きくかつ注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下で推移している。
As shown in the
グラフ24において計測値THは、一度注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下に下がった後に、注意喚起上限閾値TH2より十分小さな値である注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下まで低下している点で、前述のグラフ23の計測値THとは異なる。
In the
時刻T5においてグラフ24の計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下に下がり状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を正常と判定した直後に再び計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を注意と判定する可能性は高くない。
At time T5, the measured value TH of the
しかし、グラフ24において計測値THは、時刻T5で注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下に下がった後、短時間の間に再び時刻T6で注意喚起解除閾値TH3より大きくなり、注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下となる期間が短い。
However, in the
計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下となる期間が短い場合、注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下の計測値THは計測誤差等の影響で低い計測値THとなっていた可能性がある。このため、注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下となった後も所定時間の間、状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定せずに注意と判定していることが好ましい。
場合 If the period during which the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 is short, the measured value TH equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3 may have been a low measured value TH due to a measurement error or the like. For this reason, it is preferable that the
グラフ21において計測値THは、時刻T1において注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きくなり、時刻T2で注意喚起上限閾値TH2以下となる。またグラフ21において計測値THは、時刻T5で注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下となり、時刻T5以降は注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下で推移している。
に お い て In the
グラフ21における計測値THは、前述のグラフ24における計測値THとは異なり、時刻T5で注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下に下がった後、所定時間(期間Pが所定値以上)、例えば、時刻T5から時刻T6までの間に再度注意喚起解除閾値TH3より大きくならない。このため、時刻T5から所定時間経過後に、状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を正常と判定するようにする。
The measured value TH in the
図4に状態判定装置1が周期的に行う監視処理の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。図4に示すように、取得部10はモニタリング装置から計測値THを取得する取得処理S1を行い、取得した計測値THを判定部11に送信する。判定部11は取得部10から受信した計測値THに基づいて機械装置3の状態を判定する判定処理S2を行い、判定した情報を出力部12に送信する。出力部12は判定部11が判定した情報を判定結果出力装置4に出力する出力処理S3を行う。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of a monitoring process periodically performed by the
図5に判定処理S2の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。まず判定部11は、注意喚起閾値の範囲内か否かを判断するため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きい、又は、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH1より小さいか否か判断する(S10)。
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination process S2. First, the determining
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲内の場合(S10:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が通常か否かを判断する(S11)。判定結果が通常の場合(S11:YES)、判定部11は、判定結果を注意に設定し(S12)、判定処理S2を終了する。判定結果が通常でない場合(S11:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S2を終了する。
If the measured value TH is within the range of the alert threshold (S10: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S10:NO)、判定部11は判定結果が注意か否かを判断する(S13)。なお判定結果には状態判定装置1の初期化時などに初期値として正常が設定されており、ステップS12や後述のステップS17などで注意や正常などに再度設定される。判定結果が注意の場合(S13:YES)、判定部11は期間Pが計測されていないか否かを判断する(S14)。
If the measured value TH is out of the range of the alert threshold (S10: NO), the
期間Pが計測されていない場合(S14:YES)、判定部11は期間Pの計測を開始(S15)した後に、期間Pが計測されている場合(S14:NO)、判定部11はそのまま期間Pが所定値以上か否かを判断する(S16)。
If the period P has not been measured (S14: YES), the
期間Pが所定値以上の場合(S16:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を正常に設定し(S17)、期間Pの計測を終了し(S18)、判定処理S2を終了する。期間Pが所定値未満の場合(S16:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S2を終了する。
If the period P is equal to or longer than the predetermined value (S16: YES), the
判定結果が注意でない場合(S13:NO)、判定部11は期間Pの計測を終了し(S18)、判定処理S2を終了する。
If the judgment result is not cautionary (S13: NO), the
本実施の形態においては、判定部11は図5に示したように注意喚起解除閾値TH3を使用せずに判定処理S2を行ってもよいが、図6に示すようにステップS20において注意喚起解除閾値TH3を使用して判定処理S2を行う方が好ましい。
In the present embodiment, the
図6の本実施の形態による別の判定処理S2の処理手順を示すフローチャートに示すように、図6の処理はステップS20を追加した点を除いては図5の処理と同等である。計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S10:NO)、判定部11は計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下であるか否かを判断し(S20)、計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下であれば(S20:YES)、判定部11はステップS13へと進む。計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3より大きければ(S20:NO)、判定部11はステップS18へと進む。
As shown in the flowchart of FIG. 6 showing the procedure of another determination process S2 according to the present embodiment, the process of FIG. 6 is the same as the process of FIG. 5 except that step S20 is added. If the measured value TH is outside the range of the alert threshold (S10: NO), the
以上のように本実施形態の状態判定装置1では、計測対象が注意を必要とする状態であることをユーザに通知するための判定基準となる注意喚起上限閾値TH2の他に、注意喚起を解除するための判定基準となる注意喚起解除閾値TH3を備える。
As described above, in the
本実施形態の状態判定装置1では、所定時間の間計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より小さな値である注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下の値となった場合に機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。このため、注意が必要な状態であるにもかかわらず状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を正常と判定したり、逆に、注意が必要な状態でないにもかかわらず状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を注意と判定したりすることがない。このように本実施の形態の状態判定装置1は適切に注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる。
In the
なお本実施の形態においては注意喚起解除閾値TH3を注意喚起上限閾値TH2より小さな値に設定する場合について述べたが、注意喚起下限閾値TH1に対しては、注意喚起解除閾値TH3を注意喚起下限閾値TH1より大きな値に設定すればよい。 In the present embodiment, the case where the alert release threshold TH3 is set to a value smaller than the alert upper threshold TH2 has been described. However, the alert release threshold TH3 is set to the alert lower threshold TH1 for the alert lower threshold TH1. What is necessary is just to set to a value larger than TH1.
このように本実施の形態において状態判定装置1は、機械装置3の状態を注意と判定した後注意解除閾値TH3を参照することで状態判機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。なお注意喚起解除閾値TH3は、注意喚起上限閾値TH2と注意喚起下限閾値TH1とで別々に設けてもよいし、共通の値を1つ設けてもよいものとする。
As described above, in the present embodiment, the
なお注意喚起を解除する判定を行うために必要とする、計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下を継続する時間は、計測対象に応じて適宜設定することが可能である。例えば、計測対象に対するメンテナンス業務の頻度に応じて設定すれば良い。計測対象のメンテナンスが1日に1回であれば、少なくとも1日間、状態判定装置1が計測対象の状態を注意と判定していれば、メンテナンス時に計測対象の状態が注意であることを確認できる。
The time required for the measurement value TH to continue to be equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH3, which is necessary for making the determination to cancel the alert, can be appropriately set according to the measurement target. For example, it may be set according to the frequency of maintenance work on the measurement target. If the maintenance of the measurement target is performed once a day, if the
また例えば、運転状態と運転停止状態とが繰り返される計測対象であれば、運転状態又は運転停止状態に遷移したタイミングを解除するタイミングとしてもよいし、2度の遷移を確認したタイミングで解除してもよい。なお判定部11が運転状態と運転停止状態を使用して計測対象の状態を判定する場合においても注意喚起解除閾値TH3を用いることが望ましい。
Further, for example, if the measurement target is a repetition of the operation state and the operation stop state, the timing at which the transition to the operation state or the operation stop state may be canceled may be performed, or may be canceled at the timing when the two transitions are confirmed. Is also good. Note that it is desirable to use the alert release threshold TH3 also when the
図7に運転状態又は運転停止状態に遷移に着目した本実施の形態によるさらに別の判定処理S2の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。まず判定部11は、注意喚起閾値の範囲内か否かを判断するため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH2より大きい、又は、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH1より小さいか否か判断する(S10)。
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of still another determination processing S2 according to the present embodiment, focusing on transition to the operation state or the operation stop state. First, the determining
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲内の場合(S10:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が通常か否かを判断する(S11)。判定結果が正常の場合(S11:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を注意に設定し判定処理S2を終了する。判定結果が正常でない場合(S11:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S2を終了する。
If the measured value TH is within the range of the alert threshold (S10: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S10:NO)、判定部11は判定結果が注意か否かを判断する(S13)。判定結果が注意の場合(S13:YES)、運転状態が遷移したか否かを判断する(S25)。
If the measured value TH is out of the range of the alert threshold (S10: NO), the
運転状態が遷移した場合(S25:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を正常に設定し(S17)判定処理S2を終了し、運転状態が遷移しない場合(S25:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S2を終了する。判定結果が注意でない場合(S13:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S2を終了する。
When the operating state has transitioned (S25: YES), the
なお2度の遷移を確認する場合は2度の遷移を確認することで運転状態と運転休止状態の双方において注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下の値が継続していることを確認したことになる。このためいずれの運転状態においても注意喚起の解除が可能なことを確認してから注意喚起を解除することができる。 When confirming the two transitions, the confirmation of the two transitions confirms that the alert release threshold value TH3 or less is maintained in both the operation state and the operation stop state. Therefore, it is possible to release the alert after confirming that the alert can be released in any of the driving states.
また例えば、複数の運転状態がある計測対象であれば、運転状態が遷移したタイミングを解除するタイミングとしてもよいし、複数の運転状態全てに遷移したことを確認したタイミングで解除してもよい。 For example, if there are a plurality of operating states to be measured, the timing at which the operating state has transitioned may be set as the timing to cancel, or the timing may be canceled at the timing when it is confirmed that all the operating states have changed.
全ての運転状態への遷移を確認することで、全ての運転状態において注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下の値が継続していることを確認したことになるため、いずれの運転状態においても注意喚起の解除が可能なことを確認してから注意喚起を解除することができ好適である。 By confirming the transition to all driving states, it is confirmed that the value of the alert release threshold value TH3 or less continues in all operating states, and therefore, the release of the alert in any driving state It is preferable to be able to release the alert after confirming that it is possible.
[第2の実施の形態]
第1の実施の形態による状態判定装置1では、期間Pの間計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH3以下であることで判定結果を正常に設定する。これに対して本実施の形態における状態判定装置1は、計測値THの経時による所定期間内の変化である局所的な変化に基づいて、機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。本実施の形態における状態判定装置1の構成は第1の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。
[Second embodiment]
In the
図8にモニタリング部15が機械装置3を計測した計測値THの経時変化を示すグラフ31,32を示す。機械装置3の温度は、周囲環境の温度の影響や機械装置3の使用に伴い変化する。機械装置3は、温度によっては正常に運転することができないため、正常運転が可能な温度範囲が設定されていて、使用中は常時温度が計測され、正常運転が可能な温度範囲内であることが確認される必要がある。
FIG. 8 shows
図8では、縦軸で温度を表し横軸で時刻を表している。注意喚起下限閾値TH11は機械装置3が正常に運転するための正常運転条件の温度の下限値を示す閾値である。また注意喚起上限閾値TH12は正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値である。計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH11以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値TH12以下であれば状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。
In FIG. 8, the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time. The alert lower limit threshold value TH11 is a threshold value indicating a lower limit value of the temperature under normal operating conditions for the
注意喚起解除閾値TH13は注意喚起を解除する閾値であって、状態判定装置1によって計測対象の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。なお注意喚起を解除するための判定基準となる注意喚起解除閾値TH13は注意喚起上限閾値TH12より小さな値とする。
The alert release threshold TH13 is a threshold for canceling the alert, and is used when the state of the measurement target is determined to be caution by the
グラフ31に示すように計測値THは、時刻T11において注意喚起上限閾値TH12を超え正常運転条件の温度の範囲外となっており、時刻T12で計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となる。時刻T13で再び計測値THは注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きくなり、時刻T13以降は、計測値THは注意喚起解除閾値TH13の前後を推移している。
As shown in the
グラフ31において計測値THは、時刻T12で注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下に下がった後、例えば時刻T16までの一定時間は、注意喚起解除閾値TH13は超えるものの注意喚起上限閾値TH12以下の状態を維持している。しかしグラフ31において計測値THは、経時によって上下に振動しているため再度注意喚起上限閾値TH12より大きくなる可能性が低くない。
In the
本実施の形態の状態判定装置1は、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH12より大きくなった後、注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下に下がってからの計測値THの経時による所定期間内の変化である局所的な変化に基づいて、機械装置3の状態を判定する。
The
具体的には例えば図8において計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下に下がる時刻T12以降の後述の極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下であれば状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。
Specifically, for example, in FIG. 8, if the later-described maximum value TH_LMAX after time T12 at which the measured value TH falls below the alert release threshold TH13 is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13, the
反対に、極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きければ状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は注意と判定したままとする。グラフ31において計測値THは、時刻T14で極大値TH_LMAXとなっていて注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きいため、時刻T14では状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は注意と判定したままとする。
Conversely, if the maximum value TH_LMAX is larger than the alert release threshold TH13, the
これに対してグラフ32において計測値THは、時刻T11において注意喚起上限閾値TH12より大きくなり、時刻T12で注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となり、時刻T12以降は、注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下の値で推移している。グラフ32において計測値THは、時刻T12以降において時刻T15で極大値TH_LMAXとなっており、T15での極大値TH_LMAXは注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となっている。
On the other hand, the measured value TH in the
このため時刻T15において、状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となってから状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を正常と判定することは、計測値THが再度注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きくなる可能性が低いため本実施の形態において望ましい。
Therefore, at time T15, the
なお状態判定装置1は、注意喚起の解除を、1つ目及び2つ目の2つの極大値TH_LMAXに基づいて判定してもよい。グラフ32に示すように計測値THは、時刻T15で1回目の極大値TH_LMAXを記録した後、時刻T16で2回目の極大値TH_LMAXを記録しており、そのいずれもが、注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となっている。
The
注意喚起解除の条件を、連続する2つの極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下であることとすると、時刻T16において状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定し、注意喚起が解除される。
Assuming that the alert release condition is that two consecutive maximum values TH_LMAX are equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13, at time T16, the
2つの極大値TH_LMAXに基づいて状態判定装置1が判定することで、1つ目の極大値TH_LMAXに基づいて判定を行う場合に比べ、判定後に計測値THが再びTH13より大きくなる可能性が更に低い状態で注意喚起を解除できるため本実施の形態として好ましい。
Since the
なお、誤差やノイズ等の影響で計測値THが経時によって上下に細かく振動していると、短時間の間に極大値TH_LMAXが多発する場合がある。この場合、計測値THを平均化するなどして誤差やノイズ等の影響が低減された計測値THが示す極大値TH_LMAXを用いることで、誤差やノイズ等の影響が低減された計測値自体が示す変動特性に基づいて状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を判定することができる。
Note that if the measured value TH vibrates finely vertically over time due to the influence of an error, noise, or the like, the local maximum value TH_LMAX may frequently occur in a short time. In this case, by using the maximum value TH_LMAX indicated by the measurement value TH in which the influence of the error or the noise is reduced by averaging the measurement value TH or the like, the measurement value itself in which the influence of the error or the noise is reduced is used. The
図9に本実施の形態における判定処理S30の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。なお判定処理S30以外の監視処理は第1の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。 FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination process S30 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S30 is the same as in the first embodiment, and a description thereof will not be repeated.
まず判定部11は、注意喚起閾値の範囲内か否かを判断するため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH12より大きい、又は、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH11より小さいか否か判断する(S31)。
First, the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲内の場合(S31:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が通常か否かを判断する(S32)。判定結果が通常の場合(S32:YES)、判定部11は、判定結果を注意に設定し(S33)、判定処理S30を終了する。判定結果が通常でない場合(S32:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S30を終了する。
If the measured value TH is within the range of the alert threshold (S31: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S31:NO)、判定部11は計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下であるか否かを判断する(S34)。計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下であれば(S34:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が注意か否かを判断する(S35)。判定結果が注意の場合(S35:YES)、判定部11は後述の極大値算出処理S40の後、極大値TH_LMAXが算出されているか否かを判断する(S36)。
If the measured value TH is out of the range of the alert threshold (S31: NO), the
極大値TH_LMAXが算出されている場合(S36:YES)、判定部11は極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下であるか否かを判断する(S37)。TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下である場合(S37:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を正常に設定し、判定処理S30を終了する。
If the maximum value TH_LMAX has been calculated (S36: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きければ(S34:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S30を終了する。判定結果が注意でない場合(S35:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S30を終了する。極大値が算出されていない場合(S36:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S30を終了する。極大値TH_LMAXが注意喚起解除閾値TH13より大きい場合(S37:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S30を終了する。
け れ ば If the measured value TH is larger than the alert release threshold value TH13 (S34: NO), the
図10に極大値算出処理S40処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。図10に示すように極大値TH_LMAXは所定時間の間の最大値である。まず判定部11は、計測値THが前回の監視処理で計測した計測値THである前回計測値TH_OLD以上か否かを判断する(S41)。
FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the maximum value calculation processing S40. As shown in FIG. 10, the maximum value TH_LMAX is a maximum value during a predetermined time. First, the
計測値THが前回の監視処理で計測した計測値THである前回計測値TH_OLD以上の場合(S41:YES)、判定部11は期間Pの計測がされていないか否かを判断する(S42)。
When the measured value TH is equal to or greater than the previous measured value TH_OLD which is the measured value TH measured in the previous monitoring process (S41: YES), the determining
期間Pの計測がされていない場合(S42:YES)、判定部11は期間Pの計測を開始し(S43)、期間Pの計測がされている場合(S42:NO)、そのまま計測値THの値を前回計測値TH_OLDに設定し(S44)、極大値算出処理S40を終了する。
If the period P has not been measured (S42: YES), the
計測値THが前回の監視処理で計測した計測値THである前回計測値TH_OLDより小さい場合(S41:NO)、判定部11は期間Pが所定値以上か否かを判断する(S45)。期間Pが所定値より小さい場合(S45:NO)、判定部11は極大値算出処理S40を終了する。
If the measured value TH is smaller than the previous measured value TH_OLD which is the measured value TH measured in the previous monitoring process (S41: NO), the determining
期間Pが所定値以上の場合(S45:YES)、判定部11は、前回計測値TH_OLDの値を極大値TH_LMAXに設定し(S46)、期間Pの計測を終了し(S47)、極大値算出処理S40を終了する。
When the period P is equal to or longer than the predetermined value (S45: YES), the
以上のように本実施の形態では、計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13以下となった後の極大値TH_LMAXに基づいて、注意喚起の解除判定を行う。 As described above, in the present embodiment, the alert release determination is performed based on the local maximum value TH_LMAX after the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH13.
上記構成により、状態判定装置1は、再度注意が必要な状態に戻る可能性が十分に低い状態で注意喚起を解除することができるとともに、長時間継続して注意喚起を継続することがなく、注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる。
With the above configuration, the
なお、注意喚起下限閾値TH11に対しては、状態判定装置1において、注意喚起解除閾値TH13は注意喚起下限閾値TH11より大きな値に設定される。計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH13を上回った後に記録される極小値に基づいて、状態判定装置1は注意喚起の解除判定を行う。このように本実施の形態においては極大値TH_LMAXに限らず極値を用いて状態判定装置1は注意喚起の解除判定を行ってもよい。
In addition, with respect to the alert lower limit threshold TH11, in the
[第3の実施の形態]
第1及び第2の実施の形態による状態判定装置1では、注意喚起解除のための閾値である注意喚起解除閾値TH3,TH13を1つ使用したが、本実施の形態による状態判定装置1では注意喚起解除閾値TH23に加え、別の注意喚起解除閾値TH24を使用する。本実施の形態における状態判定装置1の構成は第1及び第2の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。
[Third Embodiment]
In the
図11にモニタリング部15が機械装置3を計測した計測値THの経時変化を示すグラフ41,42を示す。機械装置3の温度は、周囲環境の温度の影響や機械装置3の使用に伴い変化する。機械装置3は、温度によっては正常に運転することができないため、正常運転が可能な温度範囲が設定されていて、使用中は常時温度が計測され、正常運転が可能な温度範囲内であることが確認される必要がある。
グ ラ フ FIG. 11 shows
図11では、縦軸で温度を表し横軸で時刻を表している。注意喚起下限閾値TH21は機械装置3が正常に運転するための正常運転条件の温度の下限値を示す閾値である。また注意喚起上限閾値TH22は正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値である。計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH21以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値TH22以下であれば状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。
In FIG. 11, the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time. The alert lower limit threshold value TH21 is a threshold value indicating a lower limit value of the temperature under normal operating conditions for the
注意喚起解除閾値TH23,24は注意喚起を解除する閾値であって、状態判定装置1によって計測対象の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。なお注意喚起解除閾値TH23は注意喚起上限閾値TH22より小さな値とし、注意喚起解除閾値TH24は注意喚起下限閾値TH21より大きく注意喚起解除閾値TH23より小さい値とする。
The alert release thresholds TH23 and TH24 are thresholds for canceling the alert, and are used when the status of the measurement target is determined to be normal after the
注意喚起解除閾値TH24は、計測対象が正常な状態である場合の1つの値を示して、例えば、注意喚起下限閾値TH21と注意喚起上限閾値TH22との中間値(注意喚起下限閾値TH21と注意喚起上限閾値TH22とを加算し半分にした値)とする。なお、注意喚起解除閾値TH24は必ずしも中間値である必要はなく、状態判定装置1が計測対象に対して注意が不要であって正常であると判定できる値であればよい。
The alert release threshold TH24 indicates one value when the measurement target is in a normal state, and is, for example, an intermediate value between the alert lower threshold TH21 and the alert upper threshold TH22 (the alert lower threshold TH21 and the alert lower). The value obtained by adding the upper limit threshold value TH22 and halving the sum). Note that the alert release threshold TH24 does not necessarily need to be an intermediate value, and may be any value as long as the
グラフ41において計測値THは、時刻T21において注意喚起上限閾値TH22より大きくなり、時刻T22で注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下となる。時刻T22以降は、注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となることなく注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下の値で推移しているが、時刻T22以降、注意喚起解除閾値TH23に近い値で推移している。
に お い て In the
したがって、注意喚起解除閾値TH23のみを基準に判定すれば、注意喚起を解除できる状態であるが、注意が必要な状態に近い状態で推移しており、注意喚起を解除しない方がよい可能性がある。グラフ41における計測値THのように計測値が推移する場合に注意喚起を解除しないためには、注意喚起解除閾値TH23を注意喚起上限閾値TH22に対して十分に小さな値に設定すればよい。
Therefore, if the judgment is made based only on the alert release threshold TH23, the alert can be released. However, the alert is in a state close to the state requiring attention, and it may be better not to release the alert. is there. In order not to release the alert when the measured value changes like the measured value TH in the
しかし、注意喚起解除閾値TH23を過度に小さな値に設定すると、計測値THが注意喚起を解除する(状態判定装置1が計測対象の状態を注意と判定した後に正常と判定する)条件を満たせず不必要に状態判定装置1が機械装置3の状態を注意と判定し続ける可能性がある。
However, if the alert release threshold TH23 is set to an excessively small value, the measured value TH does not satisfy the condition for canceling the alert (the
本実施形態では、注意喚起解除閾値TH23とは別に注意喚起解除閾値TH24を注意喚起解除閾値TH23より小さな値に設定し、計測値THが所定時間の間注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下である状態が継続し、かつ、計測値THが少なくとも1回は注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となった場合に、状態判定装置1が計測対象の状態を正常と判定する構成とする。
In the present embodiment, the alert release threshold TH24 is set to a value smaller than the alert release threshold TH23 separately from the alert release threshold TH23, and the state in which the measured value TH is equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23 for a predetermined time continues. When the measured value TH becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold value TH24 at least once, the
例えばグラフ42において計測値THは、時刻T21において注意喚起上限閾値TH22より大きくなり、時刻T22で注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下となり、時刻T23で注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となる。グラフ42において計測値THは、時刻T22以降は、注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下の値で推移している。
For example, in the
グラフ42の計測値THは、時刻T23以降に注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となっている点でグラフ41の計測値THとは異なり、注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下に下がった時点で、注意喚起上限閾値TH22に対し十分に小さな値まで下がっているといえる。
The measured value TH of the
したがって、グラフ42における計測値THは例えば時刻T22から時刻T23までの所定時間の間注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下の値が継続し、かつ、注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となるため、状態判定装置1は計測対象の状態を正常と判定する。
Therefore, the measurement value TH in the
図12に本実施の形態における判定処理S50の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。なお判定処理S50以外の監視処理は第1及び第2の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。 FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S50 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S50 is the same as that of the first and second embodiments, and thus the description is omitted.
まず判定部11は、注意喚起閾値の範囲内か否かを判断するため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH22より大きい、又は、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH21より小さいか否か判断する(S51)。
First, the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲内の場合(S51:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が通常か否かを判断する(S52)。判定結果が通常の場合(S52:YES)、判定部11は、判定結果を注意に設定し(S53)、判定処理S50を終了する。判定結果が通常でない場合(S52:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S50を終了する。
If the measured value TH is within the range of the alert threshold (S51: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S51:NO)、判定部11は計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下であるか否かを判断する(S54)。計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下であれば(S54:YES)、判定部11は判定結果が注意か否かを判断する(S55)。判定結果が注意の場合(S55:YES)、所定時間を計測するための期間Pの計測がされていないか否かを判断する(S56)。
If the measured value TH is outside the range of the alert threshold (S51: NO), the
期間Pの計測がされていない場合(S56:YES)、判定部11は、期間Pの計測を開始し(S57)、期間Pの計測がすでにされている場合はそのまま(S56:NO)、計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH24より大きいか否かを判断する(S58)。
If the period P has not been measured (S56: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH24より大きい場合はそのまま(S58:YES)、計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下の場合は(S58:NO)フラグFをセットし(S59)、期間Pが所定値以上か否かを判断する(S60)。 If the measured value TH is larger than the alert release threshold TH24 (S58: YES), if the measured value TH is less than the alert release threshold TH24 (S58: NO), the flag F is set (S59), and the period P is set. It is determined whether the value is equal to or more than a predetermined value (S60).
なおフラグFは計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となったか否かの情報を保存する情報であって、フラグFをセットする場合はフラグFに1が設定され、フラグFをリセットする場合はフラグFに0が設定される。なおフラグFは状態判定装置1の初期化時に0に設定されるものとする。
The flag F is information for storing information indicating whether or not the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24. When the flag F is set, 1 is set to the flag F, and when the flag F is reset. Is set to 0 in the flag F. Note that the flag F is set to 0 when the
フラグFが1に設定されている場合は、期間Pの計測中に計測値THが少なくとも1度は注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となったことを示す。フラグFが0に設定されている場合は、期間Pの計測中に計測値THが1度も注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となっていないことを示す。 When the flag F is set to 1, it indicates that the measured value TH has become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24 at least once during the measurement of the period P. When the flag F is set to 0, it indicates that the measurement value TH has never become equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH24 during the measurement of the period P.
期間Pが所定値以上の場合(S60:YES)、判定部11はフラグFがセットされているか否かを判断する(S61)。フラグFがセットされている場合(S61:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を正常に設定し(S62)、期間Pの計測を終了し(S63)、フラグFをリセットし(S64)、判定処理S50を終了する。
If the period P is equal to or longer than the predetermined value (S60: YES), the
期間Pが所定値より小さい場合(S60:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S50を終了する。フラグFがセットされていない場合(S61:NO)、判定部11は判定処理S50を終了する。計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH23より大きければ(S54:NO)、判定部11は期間Pの計測を終了し(S63)、フラグFをリセットし(S64)、判定処理S50を終了する。判定結果が注意でない場合(S55:NO)、判定部11は期間Pの計測を終了し(S63)、フラグFをリセットし(S64)、判定処理S50を終了する。
If the period P is smaller than the predetermined value (S60: NO), the
以上説明したように、本実施形態では状態判定装置1が注意喚起を解除するための判定基準となる注意喚起解除閾値TH23を注意喚起上限閾値TH22より小さな値に設定する。また注意喚起解除閾値TH23とは別に、注意喚起解除閾値TH24を注意喚起解除閾値TH23より小さな値に設定する。
As described above, in the present embodiment, the
なお本実施の形態においては、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH22を超えた場合について述べたが、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH21未満となった場合についても注意喚起解除閾値TH23とは別に、注意喚起解除閾値TH24を設定してもよい。 Note that, in the present embodiment, the case where the measured value TH exceeds the alert upper limit threshold TH22 has been described. However, even when the measured value TH becomes less than the alert lower limit threshold TH21, the alert release threshold TH23 is also different. The alert release threshold TH24 may be set.
計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH21未満の場合においては、注意喚起解除閾値TH23は注意喚起下限閾値TH21より大きな値に設定し、注意喚起解除閾値TH24は注意喚起解除閾値TH23より大きな値に設定する。 When the measured value TH is less than the alert lower limit threshold TH21, the alert release threshold TH23 is set to a value larger than the alert lower threshold TH21, and the alert release threshold TH24 is set to a value greater than the alert release threshold TH23. .
本実施形態では計測値THが注意喚起解除閾値TH23以下となった後に、注意喚起解除閾値TH24以下となるか否かに基づいて、状態判定装置1は注意喚起の解除判定を行う。
In the present embodiment, after the measured value TH becomes equal to or less than the alert release threshold TH23, the
上述の通り本実施の形態においては、機械装置3が再度注意の必要な状態に戻る可能性が十分に低い状態で、状態判定装置1は注意喚起を解除する判定ができる。また本実施の形態においては、過度に注意喚起解除閾値TH23を厳しく設定しなくてよいため状態判定装置1は不必要に長時間継続して機械装置3の状態を注意と判定し(注意喚起し)続けることがなく、注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる。
As described above, in the present embodiment, in a state where the possibility that the
[第4の実施の形態]
第1~第3の実施の形態による状態判定装置1では、注意喚起上限閾値TH2,TH12,TH22を1つ使用したが、本実施の形態による状態判定装置1では注意喚起上限閾値TH32に加え、別の注意喚起上限閾値TH33を使用する。
[Fourth Embodiment]
In the
図13に本実施の形態による状態判定装置1の構成を示すブロック図を示す。本実施の形態による状態判定装置1は、第1~第3の実施の形態の構成に加え、さらに不揮発性メモリ7が判定情報データベース部46及び出力用データベース部47を備える。
FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing a configuration of the
また判定値データベース部45は、図14の本実施の形態による判定値テーブルTB11に示すように判定部11が判定の際に使用する注意喚起上限閾値TH32とは他の注意喚起上限閾値TH33の値(例えば30とする)を保持する。
In addition, as shown in the determination value table TB11 according to the present embodiment in FIG. 14, the determination
判定情報データベース部46は、判定結果出力部が出力する出力と直接結びつく判定結果とは別の判定情報を保持する図14に示す判定情報テーブルTB12を保持する。判定情報は、前回以前の計測結果に基づく情報であって、例えば注意喚起停止中(STOP)、注意喚起開始(START)、注意喚起継続中(CONTINUING)及び注意喚起解除(CANCEL)の4つとする。判定情報とは例えば計測対象に対する注意喚起の設定や解除の情報とする。
The judgment
出力用データベース部47は、図14に示す出力用テーブルTB13のように時刻毎の計測値、判定結果及び判定情報を保持する出力用の情報を保持する。図14の例では、時刻T31では計測値が45となり、判定結果は注意となり、判定情報は注意喚起開始となっている。
(4) The
同様に時刻T32では計測値が20となり、判定結果は正常となり、判定情報は注意喚起継続中となっている。時刻T33では計測値が35となり、判定結果は注意となり、判定情報は注意喚起継続中となっている。時刻T34では計測値が20となり、判定結果は正常となり、判定情報は注意喚起解除となっている。時刻T35では計測値が35となり、判定結果は正常となり、判定情報は注意喚起停止中となっている。 Similarly, at time T32, the measured value is 20, the determination result is normal, and the determination information indicates that the alert is being continued. At the time T33, the measured value becomes 35, the judgment result becomes caution, and the judgment information indicates that attention is being continued. At the time T34, the measured value becomes 20, the determination result becomes normal, and the determination information indicates that the alert is released. At time T35, the measured value becomes 35, the determination result becomes normal, and the determination information indicates that the alert is stopped.
図15にモニタリング部15が機械装置3を計測した計測値THの経時変化を示すグラフ51を示す。機械装置3の温度は、周囲環境の温度の影響や機械装置3の使用に伴い変化する。機械装置3は、温度によっては正常に運転することができないため、正常運転が可能な温度範囲が設定されていて、使用中は常時温度が計測され、正常運転が可能な温度範囲内であることが確認される必要がある。
FIG. 15 shows a
図15では、縦軸で温度を表し横軸で時刻を表している。注意喚起下限閾値TH31は機械装置3が正常に運転するための正常運転条件の温度の下限値を示す閾値である。また注意喚起上限閾値TH32は正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値である。計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH31以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値TH32以下であれば状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態は正常と判定する。
In FIG. 15, the vertical axis represents temperature and the horizontal axis represents time. The alert lower limit threshold value TH31 is a threshold value indicating the lower limit value of the temperature under the normal operation condition for the
注意喚起上限閾値TH33は注意喚起上限閾値TH32よりも小さい値であって、状態判定装置1の計測対象に対する判定情報が注意喚起開始及び注意喚起継続中である場合に、注意喚起上限閾値TH32に代わって正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値である。
The alert upper limit threshold TH33 is a value smaller than the alert upper limit threshold TH32, and replaces the alert upper limit threshold TH32 when the determination information for the measurement target of the
このように状態判定装置1の計測対象に対する判定情報が注意喚起開始及び注意喚起継続中である場合に、状態判定装置1によって計測対象の状態が注意と判定される計測値幅は、そうでない場合(注意喚起停止中及び注意喚起解除)に比べて広くなる。計測対象の状態が注意と判定される計測値幅が広がるため、状態判定装置1によって計測対象の計測結果は注意と判定されやすくなる。
As described above, when the determination information for the measurement target of the
グラフ51に示すように計測値THは時刻T31において注意喚起上限閾値TH32より大きくなり、状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を注意と判定し、判定情報を注意喚起開始と設定する。
As shown in the
グラフ51において計測値THは時刻T32では、時刻T32以前に注意喚起上限閾値TH32を超えたため判定情報が注意喚起開始に設定されている。このため状態判定装置1は、計測値THと注意喚起上限閾値TH33とを比較し、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH33以下のため、機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。なお状態判定装置1は、判定情報に関しては、例えば判定情報の判断に使用する期間Pが所定時間以上となっていないため注意喚起継続中と設定する。
In the
グラフ51において計測値THは時刻T33では、期間Pが所定値以上となっていないため判定情報は注意喚起継続中のままとなっており、正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値には注意喚起上限閾値TH33が使用される。計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH33より大きいため状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を注意と判定する。
In the
グラフ51において計測値THは時刻T34では、期間Pが所定値以上となったため判定情報は注意喚起解除となり、正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値には注意喚起上限閾値TH32が使用される。グラフ51の時刻T34おいて計測値THは注意喚起上限閾値TH32以下のため状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。
In the
グラフ51において計測値THは時刻T35では、判定状態は注意喚起解除となっており正常運転条件の温度の上限値を示す閾値には注意喚起上限閾値TH32が使用される。グラフ51の時刻T35おいて計測値THは注意喚起上限閾値TH32以下のため状態判定装置1は機械装置3の状態を正常と判定する。なお状態判定装置1は、判定情報として注意喚起解除が続くため、判定情報を注意喚起停止中と設定する。
に お い て In the
グラフ51における計測値THの時刻T33とT時刻35との状態判定装置1の判定結果は、計測値THは同じ値(図14の出力用テーブルTB13では35)であるにもかかわらずそれぞれ注意と正常となっている。
The determination result of the
グラフ51における時刻T33とT時刻35とにおいて状態判定装置1の判定情報が異なるため時刻T33では注意喚起上限閾値TH33が使用され、時刻T35では注意喚起上限閾値TH32が使用され、判定結果の判定に使用される閾値が異なるためである。
Since the determination information of the
判定情報に応じて判定結果を判定するための判定基準である注意喚起上限閾値TH32,TH33が変わることで、同じ計測値であっても、判定情報が注意喚起継続中である場合の方が注意喚起停止中の場合よりも状態判定装置1は判定結果を注意と判定しやすくなる。
By changing the alert upper limit thresholds TH32 and TH33, which are the criteria for determining the determination result in accordance with the determination information, even if the measurement values are the same, it is more important that the alert information continues to be alerted. It is easier for the
計測対象が注意喚起開始や注意喚起継続中といった注意喚起状態になった場合、一度計測値THが状態判定装置1によって正常と判定されても、再度、状態判定装置1によって判定結果が注意となる可能性が高い。
When the measurement target is in the alert state such as the alert start or the alert continuing, even if the measurement value TH is once determined to be normal by the
図16に本実施の形態における判定処理S70の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。なお判定処理S70以外の監視処理は第1~第3の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。 FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S70 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S70 is the same as in the first to third embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
まず判定部11は、注意喚起閾値の範囲内か否かを判断するため、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH32より大きい、又は、計測値THが注意喚起下限閾値TH31より小さいか否か判断する(S71)。
First, the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲内の場合(S71:YES)、判定部11は判定情報が注意喚起停止中又は注意喚起解除か否かを判断する(S72)。なお判定情報には状態判定装置1の初期化時などに初期値として注意喚起停止中が設定されており、後述のステップS73やステップS77などで注意喚起開始や注意喚起継続中などに再度設定される。
If the measured value TH is within the range of the alert threshold (S71: YES), the
判定情報が注意喚起停止中又は注意喚起解除の場合(S72:YES)、判定部11は、判定情報を注意喚起開始に設定し(S73)、判定結果を注意に設定して(S74)判定処理S70を終了する。判定情報が注意喚起停止中又は注意喚起解除でない場合(S72:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S70を終了する。
When the determination information is during the suspension of the alert or the release of the alert (S72: YES), the
計測値THが注意喚起閾値の範囲外の場合(S71:NO)、判定部11は判定情報が注意喚起開始又は注意喚起継続中であるか否かを判断する(S75)。判定情報が注意喚起開始又は注意喚起継続中でない場合(S75:NO)、判定部11は判定情報が注意喚起解除か否かを判断し(S86)、判定情報が注意喚起解除の場合(S87:YES)、判定情報を注意喚起停止中に設定して(S87)、判定処理S80を終了する。判定情報が注意喚起解除でない場合(S86:NO)、判定部11はそのまま判定処理S70を終了する。
If the measured value TH is out of the range of the alert threshold (S71: NO), the determining
判定情報が注意喚起開始又は注意喚起継続中の場合(S75:YES)、判定部11は判定情報が注意喚起継続中か否かを判断し(S76)、判定情報が注意喚起継続中の場合は判定情報に注意喚起継続中を設定する(S77)。
When the judgment information is the start of the alert or the continuation of the alert (S75: YES), the
次に判定部11は計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH33以下であるか否かを判断する(S78)。計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH33以下の場合(S78:YES)、判定部11は判定結果を正常に設定し、計測値THが注意喚起上限閾値TH33より大きい場合(S78:NO)、判定部11は判定結果を注意に設定する。
Next, the
次に判定部11は期間Pの計測がされていないか否かを判断し(S81)、期間Pの計測がされていない場合(S81:YES)、期間Pの計測を開始する(S82)。
Next, the
次に判定部11は期間Pが所定値以上か否かを判断し(S83)、期間Pが所定値より小さい場合(S83:NO)、判定処理S70を終了する。期間Pが所定値以上の場合(S83:YES)、判定部11は、判定情報を注意喚起解除に設定し(S84)、期間Pの計測を終了し(S85)、判定処理S70を終了する。
Next, the
図17に本実施の形態による判定結果出力部16が出力する出力結果60を示す概念図を示す。図17に示すように出力結果60は、グラフ表示部61、経時結果表示部62、判定結果表示部63を備える。
FIG. 17 is a conceptual diagram showing an
グラフ表示部61は計測値THの経時による変化をグラフにして表示する。経時結果表示部62は、出力用テーブルTB13の内容を表として表示する。判定結果表示部63は判定結果を文字として表示する。
(4) The
以上説明したように、本実施の形態による状態判定装置1は、判定基準が厳しく設定されることで、再度判定結果が注意となることを早急に判定することができる。また本実施の形態による状態判定装置1は、判定情報を出力することで、現在の計測対象の状態を把握させ判定結果を状態判定装置1の使用者やその関係者に適切に理解させることが可能となる。
As described above, the
なお、注意喚起上限閾値TH33は、第1~第3の実施の形態における注意喚起解除閾値TH13,TH23,TH24とは異なる閾値である。本実施の形態と同時に第1~第3の実施の形態のような判定を行ってもよい。ただし、注意喚起上限閾値TH33が、注意喚起解除閾値TH13,TH23,TH24と一致する場合はある。 The alert upper limit threshold TH33 is different from the alert release thresholds TH13, TH23, TH24 in the first to third embodiments. The determination as in the first to third embodiments may be performed simultaneously with the present embodiment. However, there are cases where the alert upper limit threshold value TH33 matches the alert alert release threshold values TH13, TH23, and TH24.
本実施の形態においては、注意喚起上限閾値TH32,TH33のように上限の閾値を2つ設ける場合について述べたが、下限の閾値についても注意喚起下限閾値TH31よりも大きい他の注意喚起下限閾値TH31’などを設けてもよい。 In the present embodiment, a case has been described in which two upper thresholds are provided, such as the alert upper thresholds TH32 and TH33. However, the lower alert threshold TH31 is also larger than the alert lower threshold TH31. 'Etc. may be provided.
注意喚起下限閾値TH31’は状態判定装置1の計測対象に対する判定情報が注意喚起開始及び注意喚起継続中である場合に、注意喚起下限閾値TH31に代わって正常運転条件の温度の下限値を示す閾値である。
The alert lower limit threshold TH31 'is a threshold indicating the lower limit value of the temperature in the normal operating condition instead of the alert lower threshold TH31 when the determination information for the measurement target of the
[第5の実施の形態]
第1~第4の実施の形態においては、1つの計測対象の計測値に基づいて状態判定装置1は計測対象の状態を判定した。これに対して本実施の形態による状態判定装置1は、計測対象の計測値WL_Lに加えて計測対象とは異なる他の計測対象の計測値WL_Uに基づいて注意喚起上限閾値WL3を変更して計測対象の状態を判定する。
[Fifth Embodiment]
In the first to fourth embodiments, the
本実施の形態における状態判定装置1の構成は第1~4の実施の形態と同様であるが、モニタリング装置2は機械装置3の温度ではなく、例えば河川における複数地点の水位を計測する。
構成 The configuration of the
図18に河川の上流である観測点Aの計測値WL_Uを示すグラフ71と河川の下流である観測点Bの計測値WL_Lを示すグラフ72を示す。図18では縦軸で水位を表し横軸で時刻を表していて、グラフ71及び72の横軸は一致するように示している。
FIG. 18 shows a
図18において、注意喚起上限閾値WL1は観測点Aにおける水位が状態判定装置1によって正常と判定されるための閾値である。注意喚起解除閾値WL2は観測点Aにおいて注意喚起が解除される閾値であって、状態判定装置1によって観測点Aにおける水位の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。
In FIG. 18, the alert upper limit threshold WL1 is a threshold for determining that the water level at the observation point A is normal by the
注意喚起上限閾値WL3は観測点Bにおける水位が状態判定装置1によって正常と判定されるための閾値である。注意喚起解除閾値WL4は観測点Bにおいて注意喚起が解除される閾値であって、状態判定装置1によって観測点Bの状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。
The alert upper limit threshold WL3 is a threshold at which the water level at the observation point B is determined to be normal by the
注意喚起解除閾値WL5は観測点Aにおける水位が状態判定装置1によって正常と判定された際に、状態判定装置1によって観測点Bにおける水位の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。なお注意喚起解除閾値WL5は注意喚起解除閾値WL4よりも大きい。
The alert release threshold WL5 is used when the water level at the observation point A is determined to be normal by the
グラフ71において計測値WL_Uは、時刻T41において注意喚起上限閾値WL1より大きくなり、時刻T43において注意喚起解除閾値WL2以下となり、時刻T43以降は注意喚起解除閾値WL2以下で推移する。
に お い て In the
またグラフ72において計測値WL_Lは、時刻T42において注意喚起解除閾値WL4より大きくなり、時刻T45において注意喚起解除閾値WL4以下となり、時刻T45以降は注意喚起解除閾値WL4以下で推移する。
In the
時刻T43において計測値WL_Lは注意喚起解除閾値WL4より大きく状態判定装置1によって観測点Bにおける水位の状態は注意と判定される。一方で、時刻T43において計測値WL_Uは注意喚起解除閾値WL2以下であり状態判定装置1によって観測点Aにおける水位の状態は正常と判定される。このことから下流の観測点Bでは水位が上がっているが、上流の観測点Aでは水位が下がっていることがわかる。
に お い て At time T43, the measured value WL_L is larger than the alert release threshold WL4, and the
上流の観測点Aで水位が下がっているため、時刻T43以降において下流の観測点Bの計測値WL_Lは、上流の観測点Aの計測値WL_Uと同様に水位が低下し計測値WL_Uは小さくなっていく可能性が高いと考えられる。 Since the water level has dropped at the upstream observation point A, the measured value WL_L of the downstream observation point B decreases and the measured value WL_U decreases after time T43, similarly to the measurement value WL_U of the upstream observation point A. It is highly likely that they will
そこで、上流の観測点Aの計測値WL_Uに基づき状態判定装置1が下流の観測点Bの計測値WL_Lに対する注意喚起解除閾値WL4を変更し、適切なタイミングで状態判定装置1は観測点Bの水位の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定することができる。
Therefore, based on the measurement value WL_U of the upstream observation point A, the
例えば、グラフ71において上流の観測点Aの計測値WL_Uは時刻T43以降、注意喚起解除閾値WL2以下に低下しており、下流の観測点Bにおいても河川の氾濫などに対する注意をする必要性が低下していると考えられる。このため注意喚起解除閾値WL4を注意喚起解除閾値WL5に変更し、計測値WL_Lが比較的高くても状態判定装置1は観測点Bにおける水位の状態を正常と判定するようにする。
For example, in the
注意喚起解除閾値WL4を注意喚起解除閾値WL5に変更することで、変更しない場合と比較し早期に状態判定装置1は観測点Bの水位の状態を正常と判定することができ、不必要に状態判定装置1が観測点Bの水位の状態を注意と判定し続けることをしなくなる。
By changing the alert release threshold WL4 to the alert release threshold WL5, the
なおグラフ71における計測値WL_Uとは逆に上流の観測点Aにおける計測値WL_Uが注意喚起上限閾値WL1より大きい状態が続く場合は下流の観測点Bにおける計測値WL_Lも時間経過とともに大きくなる可能性が高い。この場合注意喚起解除閾値WL4を厳しい条件とするようにより小さい値に設定し、状態判定装置1が観測点Bの水位の状態を注意と判定しやすいようにする。
In contrast to the measured value WL_U in the
図19に本実施の形態における判定処理S100の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。なお判定処理S100以外の監視処理は第1~第4の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。 FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of determination processing S100 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processing other than the determination processing S100 is the same as in the first to fourth embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
まず判定部11は、計測値WL_Uが注意喚起解除閾値WL2以下か否かを判断し(S101)、肯定結果の場合(S101:YES)変動閾値WLVに注意喚起解除閾値WL5を設定し(S102)、否定結果の場合(S101:NO)変動閾値WLVに注意喚起解除閾値WL4を設定する(S103)。
First, the
次に判定部11は、計測値WL_Lが変動閾値WLV以下か否かを判断し(S104)、肯定結果の場合(S104:YES)下流の観測点Bにおける判定結果を正常に設定し(S105)、判定処理S100を終了する。ステップS104の判断が否定結果の場合(S104:NO)、下流の観測点Bにおける判定結果を注意に設定し(S106)、判定処理S100を終了する。
Next, the
また、本実施の形態の別の例としては地殻変動における複数地点の変位を計測する場合が挙げられる。この場合計測対象の計測値D_Cと他の計測対象の計測値D_Dとの相対的な計測値D_Rに基づいて、それぞれの計測対象の注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2,DDV1,DDV2を設定してもよい。 Another example of the present embodiment is a case where displacements at a plurality of points due to crustal deformation are measured. In this case, even if the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 of the respective measurement targets are set based on the relative measurement value D_R of the measurement value D_C of the measurement target and the measurement value D_D of the other measurement target. Good.
なお注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2は状態判定装置1によって観測点Cの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。同様に注意喚起解除閾値DDV1,DDV2は状態判定装置1によって観測点Dの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に正常と判定される際に使用される閾値である。
Note that the alert release thresholds DCV1 and DCV2 are used when the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined to be normal after the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined by the
図20に観測点Cの計測値D_Cを示すグラフ81、観測点Dの計測値D_Dを示すグラフ82及び観測点C及び観測点Dの相対値D_Rを示すグラフ83を示す。なお観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位とは互いに連動する可能性があるものとする。図20では縦軸で変位を表し横軸で時刻を表していて、グラフ81、82及び83の横軸は一致するように示している。
FIG. 20 shows a
本実施の形態の別の例においては、変位の量(以下、これを変動と呼んでもよい)が小さい場合が観測点C,Dにおける正常な状態であり、観測点C,Dにおける変動が大きいほど、地震などへの注意が必要な状態であるとする。 In another example of the present embodiment, a case where the amount of displacement (hereinafter, this may be referred to as fluctuation) is small is a normal state at observation points C and D, and fluctuation at observation points C and D is large. It is assumed that the situation requires more attention to an earthquake.
図20において、注意喚起下限閾値D1は状態判定装置1が観測点Cの変位の状態を正常と判定する場合の下限を示す閾値であり、注意喚起上限閾値D2は状態判定装置1が観測点Cの変位の状態を正常と判定する場合の上限を示す閾値である。
In FIG. 20, the alert lower limit threshold D1 is a threshold indicating a lower limit when the
また注意喚起基準閾値D3は注意喚起下限閾値D1と注意喚起上限閾値D2との中間値又は中間値付近の値であって基準となる値とし、計測値D_Cが注意喚起基準閾値D3に近いほど、観測点Cの変位の状態は本来あるべき状態(正常)に近いものとする。 The alert reference threshold D3 is an intermediate value or a value near the intermediate value between the alert lower threshold D1 and the alert upper threshold D2, which is a reference value. As the measured value D_C is closer to the alert reference threshold D3, It is assumed that the state of displacement of the observation point C is close to the state that should be originally (normal).
注意喚起解除閾値D10は、計測値D_Cが注意喚起上限閾値D2より大きい値となり状態判定装置1によって観測点Cの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に通常と判定されるための閾値とされる(後述のように注意喚起解除閾値DCV1に設定される)。
The alert release threshold D10 is a threshold for which the measured value D_C becomes a value greater than the alert upper limit threshold D2 and the state of the displacement of the observation point C is determined to be normal after the
注意喚起解除閾値D11は、計測値D_Cが注意喚起下限閾値D1より小さい値となり状態判定装置1によって観測点Cの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に通常と判定されるための閾値とされる(後述のように注意喚起解除閾値DCV2に設定される)。
The alert release threshold D11 is a threshold for determining that the measured value D_C is smaller than the alert lower limit threshold D1 and that the state of the displacement of the observation point C is normal after the
図20において、注意喚起下限閾値D4は状態判定装置1が観測点Dの変位の状態を正常と判定する場合の下限を示す閾値であり、注意喚起上限閾値D5は状態判定装置1が観測点Dの変位の状態を正常と判定する場合の上限を示す閾値である。
In FIG. 20, the alert lower limit threshold D4 is a threshold indicating the lower limit when the
また注意喚起基準閾値D6は注意喚起下限閾値D4と注意喚起上限閾値D5との中間値又は中間値付近の値であって基準となる値とし、計測値D_Dが注意喚起基準閾値D6に近いほど、観測点Dの変位の状態は本来あるべき状態(正常)に近いものとする。 Also, the alert reference threshold D6 is an intermediate value between the alert lower threshold D4 and the alert upper threshold D5 or a value near the intermediate value, which is a reference value. As the measured value D_D is closer to the alert reference threshold D6, It is assumed that the state of displacement of the observation point D is close to the state that should be originally (normal).
注意喚起解除閾値D14は計測値D_Dが注意喚起上限閾値D5より大きい値となり状態判定装置1によって観測点Dの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に通常と判定されるための閾値とされる(後述のように注意喚起解除閾値DDV1に設定される。
The alert release threshold value D14 is a threshold value at which the measured value D_D becomes greater than the alert upper limit threshold value D5 and the
注意喚起解除閾値D15は計測値D_Dが注意喚起下限閾値D4より小さい値となり状態判定装置1によって観測点Dの変位の状態が注意と判定された後に通常と判定されるための閾値される(後述のように注意喚起解除閾値DDV2に設定される)。
The alert release threshold D15 is a threshold for determining that the measured value D_D is smaller than the alert lower limit threshold D4 and that the state of the displacement of the observation point D is normal after the
観測点C及び観測点Dが無関係である場合、図20におけるグラフ81の計測値D_Cは、注意喚起下限閾値D1以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値D2以下の値であって注意喚起閾値内であるため、観測点Cの変位の状態は正常であるといえる。
When the observation point C and the observation point D are irrelevant, the measured value D_C of the
同様に観測点C及び観測点Dが無関係である場合、図20におけるグラフ82の計測値D_Dは、注意喚起下限閾値D4以上かつ注意喚起上限閾値D6以下の値であって注意喚起閾値内であるため、観測点Dの変位の状態は正常であるといえる。
Similarly, when the observation point C and the observation point D are irrelevant, the measured value D_D of the
しかし、観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位とが連動する可能性のある観測点であり、観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位との相対的な変位にも注意しなければならない場合は、観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位との相対値で評価される必要がある。 However, the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D are observation points that may be interlocked, and the relative displacement between the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D must also be noted. In this case, it is necessary to evaluate the relative value of the displacement of the observation point C and the displacement of the observation point D.
図20におけるグラフ83の相対値D_Rは、観測点Dから見た観測点Cの相対変位を示している。注意喚起基準閾値D9は注意喚起基準閾値D6から注意喚起基準閾値D3を減算した値となっており、注意喚起下限閾値D7は状態判定装置1が観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位との相対値を正常と判定する場合の下限を示す閾値である。また注意喚起上限閾値D8は、状態判定装置1が観測点Cの変位と観測点Dの変位との相対値を正常と判定する場合の上限を示す閾値である。
相 対 Relative value D_R in
グラフ81及びグラフ82に示すように計測値D_Cと計測値D_Dとは互いに離れるように推移しているため、グラフ83の相対値D_Rは時間の経過とともに大きくなり、時刻T51において、注意喚起上限閾値D8より大きくなる。
As shown in the
このように観測点Cの変位の状態と観測点Dの変位の状態とは、個々の変位のみに注目した場合は正常であるといえるが、相対変位に注目した場合は注意が必要であるといえる。 As described above, the state of displacement of the observation point C and the state of displacement of the observation point D can be said to be normal when attention is paid only to individual displacements, but care must be taken when attention is paid to relative displacements. I can say.
本実施の形態の別の例では、互いに連動したり相互作用したり相対関係が重要な意味を有する複数の計測対象を計測する場合に、各観測点の絶対的な計測値のみでなく、相対的な関係に基づいて、注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2,DDV1,DDV2を設定するようにする。 In another example of the present embodiment, when measuring a plurality of measurement objects that are linked or interact with each other or have a significant relative relationship, not only the absolute measurement value of each observation point but also the relative measurement value The alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 are set based on the logical relationship.
例えば図20におけるグラフ81,82,83においては、時刻T51以降は相対値D_Rが注意喚起上限閾値D8より大きくなる。このため計測値D_C,D_Dに対する注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2,DDV1,DDV2を注意喚起解除閾値D10,D11,D14,D15ではなく注意喚起解除閾値D12,D13,D16,D17として厳しく設定すればよい。
For example, in the
なお注意喚起解除閾値D10,D14は、計測値D_C,D_Dが注意喚起上限閾値D2,D5を超えて判定された注意の判定結果の解除のための閾値である。注意喚起解除閾値D10,D14に対して注意の判定結果の解除のための閾値を厳しく設定するためには、注意喚起解除閾値D10,D14より小さい値である注意喚起解除閾値D12,D16とする必要がある。 Note that the alert release thresholds D10 and D14 are thresholds for canceling the determination result of the alert when the measured values D_C and D_D exceed the alert upper limit thresholds D2 and D5. In order to strictly set the threshold for canceling the attention determination result with respect to the alert release thresholds D10 and D14, the alert release thresholds D12 and D16 need to be smaller than the alert release thresholds D10 and D14. There is.
同様に注意喚起解除閾値D11,D15は、計測値D_C,D_Dが注意喚起下限閾値D1,D4を超えて判定された注意の判定結果の解除のための閾値である。注意喚起解除閾値D11,D15に対して注意の判定結果の解除のための閾値を厳しく設定するためには、注意喚起解除閾値D11,D15より大きい値である注意喚起解除閾値D13,D17とする必要がある。 Similarly, the alert release thresholds D11 and D15 are thresholds for canceling the determination result of the alert when the measured values D_C and D_D exceed the alert lower limit thresholds D1 and D4. In order to strictly set the threshold for canceling the attention determination result with respect to the alert release thresholds D11 and D15, the alert release thresholds D13 and D17 need to be larger than the alert release thresholds D11 and D15. There is.
図21に本実施の形態における判定処理S110,S120,S130の処理手順を示すフローチャートを示す。なお判定処理S110,S120,S130以外の監視処理は第1~第4の実施の形態と同様であるため説明を省略する。 FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the determination processes S110, S120, and S130 in the present embodiment. Note that the monitoring processes other than the determination processes S110, S120, and S130 are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments, and a description thereof will be omitted.
判定部11は、判定処理S110では相対値D_Rの判定結果を算出し、判定処理S120では相対値D_Rの判定結果に基づいて観測点Cの変位の状態の判定結果を出力し、判定処理S130では相対値D_Rの判定結果に基づいて観測点Dの変位の状態の判定結果を出力する。
The
判定処理S110において判定部11は、相対値D_Rが注意喚起上限閾値D8より大きいか、又は、相対値D_Rが注意喚起下限閾値D7より小さい否かを判断する(S111)。
In the determination process S110, the
ステップS111が肯定結果の場合(S111:YES)、判定部11は相対値D_Rの判定結果を注意に設定し(S112)、判定処理S110を終了する。ステップS112が否定結果の場合(S111:NO)、判定部は相対値D_Rの判定結果を正常に設定し(S113)、判定処理S110を終了する。
If the result of step S111 is affirmative (S111: YES), the
判定処理S120において判定部11は、相対値D_Rの判定結果が注意に設定されているか否かを判断する(S121)。ステップS121が肯定結果の場合(S121:YES)、判定部11は注意喚起解除閾値DCV1に注意喚起解除閾値D12、注意喚起解除閾値DCV2に注意喚起解除閾値D13を設定する(S122)。
In the determination process S120, the
ステップS121が否定結果の場合(S121:NO)、判定部11は注意喚起解除閾値DCV1に注意喚起解除閾値D10、注意喚起解除閾値DCV2に注意喚起解除閾値D11を設定する(S123)。
場合 If step S121 is a negative result (S121: NO), the
次に判定部11は、計測値D_Cが注意喚起解除閾値DCV1以下であるか、又は、計測値D_Cが注意喚起解除閾値DCV2以上であるか否かを判断する(S124)。ステップS124が肯定結果の場合(S124:YES)、判定部11は観測点Cの変位の状態の判定結果を正常に設定し(S125)、判定処理S120を終了する。ステップS124が否定結果の場合(S124:NO)、判定部11は観測点Cの変位の状態の判定結果を注意に設定し(S126)、判定処理S120を終了する。
Next, the
判定処理S130において判定部11は、相対値D_Rの判定結果が注意に設定されているか否かを判断する(S131)。ステップS131が肯定結果の場合(S131:YES)、判定部11は注意喚起解除閾値DDV1に注意喚起解除閾値D16、注意喚起解除閾値DDV2に注意喚起解除閾値D17を設定する(S132)。
In the determination process S130, the
ステップS131が否定結果の場合(S131:NO)、判定部11は注意喚起解除閾値DDV1に注意喚起解除閾値D14、注意喚起解除閾値DDV2に注意喚起解除閾値D15を設定する(S133)。
場合 If step S131 is a negative result (S131: NO), the
次に判定部11は、計測値D_Dが注意喚起解除閾値DDV1以下であるか、又は、計測値D_Dが注意喚起解除閾値DDV2以上であるか否かを判断する(S134)。ステップS134が肯定結果の場合(S134:YES)、判定部11は観測点Dの変位の状態の判定結果を正常に設定し(S135)、判定処理S120を終了する。ステップS134が否定結果の場合(S134:NO)、判定部11は観測点Dの変位の状態の判定結果を注意に設定し(S136)、判定処理S120を終了する。
Next, the
なお地殻変動のような計測においては、計測する方向とは異なる方向の変位も考慮して、閾値を変更してもよい。例えばある観測点の地表面上での変位を観測する場合を例に挙げて説明する。 計 測 In measurement such as crustal movement, the threshold may be changed in consideration of displacement in a direction different from the direction in which measurement is performed. For example, a case where a displacement of a certain observation point on the ground surface is observed will be described as an example.
観測点は、地表面内の動きだけでなく地平面に対して垂直な方向にも変位している場合があるため、地平面内での変位が小さい場合においても地平面に垂直な方向に変位が生じることで注意が必要な状態となっている可能性もある。 Since the observation point may be displaced not only in the ground plane but also in the direction perpendicular to the ground plane, even if the displacement in the ground plane is small, it will be displaced in the direction perpendicular to the ground plane. May cause a situation that requires attention.
このように地平面に垂直な方向に所定値を超える変位が生じた場合は、地平面内の変位に基づいて判定の際の閾値を変更すればよい。以上説明したように、本実施形態では、計測対象とは異なる他の計測対象の計測値に基づいて、注意喚起上限閾値WL3や注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2,DDV1,DDV2を変更することで、注意喚起及びその解除を行うことができる。 場合 If a displacement exceeding a predetermined value occurs in a direction perpendicular to the ground plane in this way, the threshold for determination may be changed based on the displacement in the ground plane. As described above, in the present embodiment, the alert upper limit threshold WL3 and the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, DDV2 are changed based on the measurement value of another measurement object different from the measurement object. It can alert and release it.
[その他の実施の形態]
第1~第5の実施の形態においては、判定結果を注意と正常の2つのみとしたが本発明はこれに限らない。例えば注意喚起が必要な状態として、軽度な警戒が必要な注意と、重度な警戒が必要な警告と、直ちに対応が必要な異常との、3つの状態が定義され、それぞれの場合に出力部から注意情報、警告情報及び異常情報が出力されてもよい。
[Other embodiments]
In the first to fifth embodiments, only two judgment results, caution and normal, are made, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, three states are defined as alerts that require alerting: alerts that require minor alerts, warnings that require severe alerts, and abnormalities that require immediate attention. Attention information, warning information, and abnormality information may be output.
この場合、注意の状態に対しては注意喚起上限閾値と注意喚起下限閾値とが設定され、警告の状態に対しては警告通知上限閾値と警告通知下限閾値とが設定され、異常の状態に対しては異常発生上限閾値と異常発生下限閾値とが設定されてもよい。 In this case, an alert upper threshold and an alert lower threshold are set for the alert state, an alert upper threshold and an alert lower threshold are set for the alert status, and an alert alert lower threshold is set for the alert status. Alternatively, an abnormality occurrence upper limit threshold and an abnormality occurrence lower limit threshold may be set.
また注意の状態が解除されるには注意喚起解除閾値が使用され、警告の状態が解除されるには警告通知解除閾値が使用され、異常の状態が解除されるには異常発生解除閾値が使用されるようにしてもよい。このように3つの状態が解除される条件がそれぞれ設定されることで状況に適した処理が実現される。 The alert release threshold is used to release the caution state, the warning notification release threshold is used to release the warning state, and the abnormality release threshold is used to release the abnormal state May be performed. By setting the conditions for canceling the three states in this way, processing suitable for the situation is realized.
例えば正常な状態となってから解除までの経過時間を、警告の状態の場合は注意の状態の場合よりも長くする。また、異常の状態の場合は、注意及び警告の状態の場合と異なり、時間経過による解除は行われず、異常の状態を修正する所定の対応が完了したことを確認してから解除される構成とすると、異常の状態が誤って解除されることがないため好ましい。 For example, the elapsed time from the normal state to the release is made longer in the case of the warning state than in the case of the caution state. In the case of an abnormal state, unlike the case of the caution and warning states, the state is not released over time, and is released after confirming that a predetermined response for correcting the abnormal state has been completed. This is preferable because the abnormal state is not erroneously released.
また第5の実施の形態においては、注意喚起解除閾値DCV1,DCV2,DDV1,DDV2を相対値D_Rに基づいて変更したが計測値が注意喚起上限閾値以上となる継続時間や記録回数に応じて注意喚起解除閾値を変更してもよい。 In the fifth embodiment, the alert release thresholds DCV1, DCV2, DDV1, and DDV2 are changed based on the relative value D_R. However, attention is required depending on the duration or the number of recordings in which the measured value is equal to or greater than the alert upper limit threshold. The arousal release threshold may be changed.
計測値が注意喚起閾値より大きくなると状態判定装置1は計測対象の状態を注意と判定するが、計測値がその後間もなく注意喚起上限閾値以下となり、更に注意喚起解除閾値以下となる場合がある。
(4) When the measured value is larger than the alert threshold, the
この場合、計測誤差や計測ノイズ等の影響で一時的に計測値が注意喚起上限閾値より大きくなった可能性がある。また、長時間の間は、計測値が注意喚起上限閾値より大きくならないため、計測対象が注意すべき状態である可能性は高くないと考えられる。 In this case, there is a possibility that the measured value temporarily exceeds the alert upper limit threshold value due to a measurement error or measurement noise. Also, during a long period of time, the measured value does not become larger than the alert upper limit threshold, so it is considered that the possibility that the measurement target is in a state to be careful is not high.
一方、計測値が一度注意喚起上限閾値より大きくなってから、長時間の間注意喚起上限閾値より大きくなる場合、その原因は誤差やノイズ等の影響である可能性は低く、計測対象が注意すべき状態である可能性が高いと考えられる。このため計測値が注意喚起閾値より大きい状態の継続時間に応じて注意喚起状態解除閾値を変更することで状況に適した処理が実現される。 On the other hand, if the measured value once becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold and then becomes larger than the alert upper limit threshold for a long time, the cause is unlikely to be the influence of errors, noise, etc. It is likely that the state should be high. Therefore, by changing the alerting state release threshold according to the duration of the state where the measured value is greater than the alerting threshold, processing suitable for the situation is realized.
例えば計測値が注意喚起閾値より大きい状態の継続時間が長いほど、注意喚起状態解除閾値を低く設定することで状態判定装置1による注意の判定が解除されにくくする。このことで、測定対象の状態が注意すべきである可能性が高いほど状態判定装置1による注意の判定が解除されにくくなる。
For example, the longer the duration of the state where the measured value is larger than the alerting threshold, the lower the alerting state release threshold, so that it is difficult for the
また、測定対象の状態が注意すべき状態である可能性が低いほど状態判定装置1による注意の判定が解除されやすくなる。このため不必要に状態判定装置1が注意と判定し続けることがなくなる。
ほ ど In addition, the lower the possibility that the state of the measurement target is a state that requires attention, the easier the
なお誤差やノイズの影響が大きく、一部を除いては計測値が注意喚起閾値より大きい状態が継続しているにも関わらず、誤差やノイズの影響で計測値が注意喚起閾値以下の値となってしまう場合がある。 In addition, the effect of errors and noise is large, and although the measured value continues to be larger than the alert threshold except for a part, the measured value is less than the alert threshold due to the influence of error and noise. It may be.
この場合には例えば所定時間内に測定値が注意喚起閾値より大きくなった回数に基づいて判定してもよいし、計測値の所定時間内の平均値が注意喚起閾値以上である状態の継続時間に基づいて判定してもよい。 In this case, for example, the determination may be made based on the number of times the measured value has become larger than the alert threshold within a predetermined time, or the duration of a state in which the average value of the measured values within the predetermined time is equal to or more than the alert threshold. May be determined based on
Claims (15)
取得された前記計測値が第1の上限閾値及び下限閾値の範囲外の値となった場合に注意情報を出力する出力部とを有し、
前記出力部は、前記注意情報の出力中に、前記計測値が所定時間の間、前記第1の上限閾値及び前記下限閾値とは異なる値に設定された第1の解除閾値の値を参照し前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
状態判定装置。 An acquisition unit for acquiring a measurement value of a measurement target,
An output unit that outputs caution information when the acquired measurement value is outside the range of the first upper threshold and the lower threshold.
The output unit refers to a value of a first release threshold set to a value different from the first upper threshold and the lower threshold for a predetermined time while the caution information is output. Stopping the output of the caution information,
State determination device.
前記出力部は、前記計測値が前記下限閾値の値以下となった場合に、前記下限閾値より大きな値に設定された前記第1の解除閾値に基づいて前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to output the caution based on the first release threshold set to a value smaller than the first upper threshold when the measured value is equal to or greater than the value of the first upper threshold and outputting caution information. Stop outputting information,
The output unit, when the measured value is equal to or less than the lower threshold, stops outputting the attention information based on the first release threshold set to a value greater than the lower threshold,
The state determination device according to claim 1.
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to stop outputting the attention information based on a local change that is a change within a predetermined period due to the lapse of time of the measurement value.
The state determination device according to claim 1.
又は、前記出力部は、前記計測値が前記第1の解除閾値の値以上となった後に最初に前記計測値の極小値が前記第1の解除閾値の値以上である場合に前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項3に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit outputs the caution information when the local maximum value of the measurement value is equal to or less than the first cancellation threshold value after the measurement value is equal to or less than the value of the first cancellation threshold value. Stop,
Alternatively, the output unit may be configured such that, when the minimum value of the measurement value is equal to or greater than the first cancellation threshold value first after the measurement value equals or exceeds the value of the first cancellation threshold value, Stop output,
The state determination device according to claim 3.
又は、前記出力部は、前記計測値が前記第1の解除閾値の値以上となった後に2番目に前記計測値の極小値が前記第1の解除閾値の値以上となる場合に前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項3に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to output the caution information when the local maximum value of the measurement value becomes the second release threshold or less second after the measurement value becomes the value of the first release threshold or less. To stop the
Alternatively, the output unit may be configured such that when the measured value is equal to or more than the first release threshold value and the second minimum value of the measured value is equal to or greater than the first release threshold value, the caution information is displayed. Stop output of
The state determination device according to claim 3.
又は、前記出力部は、前記計測値が前記第1の解除閾値の値以上となった後に、前記第1の解除閾値とは異なる第2の解除閾値の値以上となった場合に前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit outputs the caution information when the measured value becomes equal to or less than a value of the first cancellation threshold and then becomes equal to or less than a value of a second cancellation threshold different from the first cancellation threshold. To stop the
Alternatively, the output unit may be configured to set the caution information when the measured value is equal to or greater than a value of the first cancellation threshold and is equal to or greater than a value of a second cancellation threshold different from the first cancellation threshold. Stop output of
The state determination device according to claim 1.
請求項6に記載の状態判定装置。 The second release threshold is a substantially intermediate value between the first upper threshold and the lower threshold.
The state determination device according to claim 6.
又は、前記出力部は、前記注意情報が出力中である場合に、前記下限閾値より大きな値である他の下限閾値に基づいて前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit, when the attention information is being output, stops outputting the attention information based on a second upper threshold that is a value smaller than the first upper threshold,
Or, the output unit, when the attention information is being output, stops outputting the attention information based on another lower threshold that is a value greater than the lower threshold,
The state determination device according to claim 1.
請求項1から請求項5のいずれか一項に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to measure the measurement value of one of the plurality of measurement targets, the first release threshold set for the one measurement target, and another measurement different from the one measurement target. Stopping output of the attention information of the one measurement target based on the other measurement value of the target,
The state judging device according to claim 1.
請求項1から請求項5のいずれか一項に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to measure the measurement value of one of the plurality of measurement targets, the first release threshold set for the one measurement target, and another measurement different from the one measurement target. Stopping output of the caution information of the one measurement target, based on a relative value of the measurement value to another measurement value of the target,
The state judging device according to claim 1.
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit outputs information output based on a threshold different from the attention information,
The state determination device according to claim 1.
又は、前記計測値が前記下限閾値の値以下となった継続時間に基づいて、前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit is configured to stop outputting the caution information based on a duration in which the measured value is equal to or greater than the first upper threshold value.
Or, based on the duration of the measured value is equal to or less than the value of the lower threshold, to stop outputting the attention information,
The state determination device according to claim 1.
又は、前記計測値が前記下限閾値の値以下となった回数に基づいて、前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
請求項1に記載の状態判定装置。 The output unit, based on the number of times the measured value is equal to or more than the first upper threshold value, stops outputting the attention information,
Or, based on the number of times the measured value is equal to or less than the value of the lower threshold, stop outputting the attention information,
The state determination device according to claim 1.
取得された前記計測値が第1の上限閾値及び下限閾値の範囲外の値となった場合に注意情報を出力し、
前記注意情報の出力中に、前記計測値が所定時間の間、前記第1の上限閾値及び前記下限閾値とは異なる値に設定された第1の解除閾値の値を参照し前記注意情報の出力を停止する、
状態判定方法。 Get the measurement value of the measurement target,
If the acquired measurement value is a value outside the range of the first upper threshold value and the lower threshold value, output caution information;
During the output of the caution information, the measurement value is output for the caution information while referring to a value of a first cancellation threshold set to a value different from the first upper threshold and the lower threshold during a predetermined time. To stop the
State determination method.
取得された前記計測値が第1の上限閾値及び下限閾値の範囲外の値となった場合に注意情報を出力し、前記注意情報の出力中に、前記計測値が所定時間の間、前記第1の上限閾値及び前記下限閾値とは異なる値に設定された第1の解除閾値の値を参照し前記注意情報の出力を停止する、出力手段、
としてコンピュータを機能させる状態判定プログラム。 An acquisition unit for acquiring a measurement value of a measurement target,
When the acquired measurement value is a value outside the range of the first upper threshold value and the lower threshold value, the caution information is output. During the output of the caution information, the measurement value is the predetermined value for the predetermined time. Output means for stopping output of the attention information by referring to a value of a first release threshold set to a value different from the upper limit threshold of 1 and the lower limit threshold,
A state determination program that causes a computer to function as
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2020550303A JP7096901B2 (en) | 2018-10-04 | 2019-09-20 | Status determination device, status determination method and status determination program |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018188965 | 2018-10-04 | ||
| JP2018-188965 | 2018-10-04 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2020071160A1 true WO2020071160A1 (en) | 2020-04-09 |
Family
ID=70054874
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2019/037006 Ceased WO2020071160A1 (en) | 2018-10-04 | 2019-09-20 | State determination device, state determination method, and state determination program |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7096901B2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020071160A1 (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20020105435A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-08 | Yee David Moon | Electric power meter including a temperature sensor and controller |
| US20030046031A1 (en) * | 2001-08-29 | 2003-03-06 | Conrad Jeffrey Richard | Baselining of data collector data |
| US20050057355A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-17 | Barrieau Mark P. | Fire alarm with distinct alarm reset threshold |
| WO2012043029A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-04-05 | 株式会社創業 | Network apparatus-monitoring monitor device |
| CN104574848A (en) * | 2015-01-14 | 2015-04-29 | 深圳市欧瑞博电子有限公司 | Warning method of fuel gas warning device |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH05303432A (en) * | 1992-02-27 | 1993-11-16 | Sanyo Electric Co Ltd | Abnormality alarming device for temperature control device |
-
2019
- 2019-09-20 WO PCT/JP2019/037006 patent/WO2020071160A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2019-09-20 JP JP2020550303A patent/JP7096901B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20020105435A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-08 | Yee David Moon | Electric power meter including a temperature sensor and controller |
| US20030046031A1 (en) * | 2001-08-29 | 2003-03-06 | Conrad Jeffrey Richard | Baselining of data collector data |
| US20050057355A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-17 | Barrieau Mark P. | Fire alarm with distinct alarm reset threshold |
| WO2012043029A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-04-05 | 株式会社創業 | Network apparatus-monitoring monitor device |
| CN104574848A (en) * | 2015-01-14 | 2015-04-29 | 深圳市欧瑞博电子有限公司 | Warning method of fuel gas warning device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP7096901B2 (en) | 2022-07-06 |
| JPWO2020071160A1 (en) | 2021-09-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA3078987C (en) | Fire detection system | |
| CN103026720B (en) | Optical self-diagnosis of stereo camera system | |
| CN106991072A (en) | Automatic measure on line event detection model update method and device | |
| KR20110031923A (en) | How to Provide Tsunami Alarm Systems and Tsunami Alarms | |
| CN103810823B (en) | Alarm processing method and device | |
| CN109166265A (en) | Classifying alarm method, terminal and the storage medium of fire-fighting link net broadcast system | |
| JP4111660B2 (en) | Fire detection equipment | |
| CN103282847B (en) | The method and system for monitoring industrial system with eye tracking system | |
| CN104301688A (en) | Method and system for monitoring sounds | |
| US20170024998A1 (en) | Setting method and apparatus for surveillance system, and computer-readable recording medium | |
| WO2020071160A1 (en) | State determination device, state determination method, and state determination program | |
| JP2018093347A (en) | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program | |
| JP5710230B2 (en) | Monitoring system and monitoring method | |
| JP5318007B2 (en) | LNG tank alarm device | |
| CN207530963U (en) | A kind of illegal geofence system based on video monitoring | |
| JP2005293204A (en) | Disaster prevention apparatus | |
| WO2020090715A1 (en) | Process management device, process management method, and process management program storage medium | |
| JP2005173911A (en) | Process control system and process control method | |
| KR20060112207A (en) | Security system | |
| CN108877131A (en) | A kind of security alarm method and apparatus | |
| JP5844841B2 (en) | Alarm | |
| JP2000105137A (en) | Method and apparatus for detection of avalanche of rocks and earth | |
| JP5548415B2 (en) | Fire alarm | |
| CN104270622A (en) | Switch cabinet detection method and system | |
| CN116597603A (en) | Intelligent fire-fighting fire alarm system and control method thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 19868434 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2020550303 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 19868434 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |