[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2019000091A1 - Stabilization of hazardous materials - Google Patents

Stabilization of hazardous materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019000091A1
WO2019000091A1 PCT/CA2018/050790 CA2018050790W WO2019000091A1 WO 2019000091 A1 WO2019000091 A1 WO 2019000091A1 CA 2018050790 W CA2018050790 W CA 2018050790W WO 2019000091 A1 WO2019000091 A1 WO 2019000091A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
arsenic
aluminum
scorodite
gel
carbonate base
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/CA2018/050790
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
George DEMOPOULOS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning
Original Assignee
Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning filed Critical Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning
Priority to CA3096126A priority Critical patent/CA3096126A1/en
Priority to MX2020000165A priority patent/MX2020000165A/en
Priority to JP2019571443A priority patent/JP7265267B6/en
Priority to EP18823982.6A priority patent/EP3645132A4/en
Priority to PE2019002680A priority patent/PE20200766A1/en
Priority to AU2018292424A priority patent/AU2018292424B2/en
Priority to CN201880049403.1A priority patent/CN110944724B/en
Publication of WO2019000091A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019000091A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09BDISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B09B3/00Destroying solid waste or transforming solid waste into something useful or harmless
    • B09B3/20Agglomeration, binding or encapsulation of solid waste
    • B09B3/25Agglomeration, binding or encapsulation of solid waste using mineral binders or matrix
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09BDISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B09B3/00Destroying solid waste or transforming solid waste into something useful or harmless
    • B09B3/20Agglomeration, binding or encapsulation of solid waste
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09CRECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • B09C1/08Reclamation of contaminated soil chemically

Definitions

  • This invention relates to stabilization / solidification of hazardous materials and, in particular, arsenical wastes through encapsulation with mineralized products of hydrolyzed aluminum gels.
  • Stabilization/solidification is an approach used for the fixation of toxic waste materials of various types and sources.
  • An example of such a process involves the mixing of a toxic waste with cement and/or other binder materials to produce a chemically and physically stable solid mass suitable for use in the landfill.
  • the most common technologies currently used for the stabilization/solidification of hazardous wastes are those based upon hydraulic cement and/or slaked lime and, less commonly, organic polymers, sulphur polymer cement, and other encapsulation materials.
  • a method for the stabilization of hazardous materials comprising:
  • carbonate base such as NaHC03 or Na 2 COs
  • aluminum gels and their mineralized products in stabilization of hazardous materials.
  • a composite comprising scorodite particles and a gel-derived solidified matrix comprising aluminum (oxy)hydroxide mineral phases.
  • a composite prepared by the method as defined herein.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph of the evolution profiles of pH and Eh with time during stability testing of scorodite-gel blends using either Na 2 S0 3 (top) or Na 2 S (bottom) to adjust Eh;
  • FIG. 2 depicts arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from reference bases NaOH and Mg(OH) 2 , compared to a carbonate base
  • FIG. 3 depicts arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from reference bases NaOH and Mg(OH) 2 , compared to a carbonate base
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing the arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with Al-gels prepared from NaOH, Na2C03 and NaHC03 under anoxic (Na2S03) condition and pH ⁇ 9;
  • FIG. 5. represents the arsenic release from scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from Na 2 C0 3 and NaHC0 3 under anoxic condition chemically generated with Na 2 S;
  • FIG. 6 depicts XRD patterns of Na 2 C0 3 derived aluminum gels after 167 days stability testing under oxic and anoxic conditions;
  • FIG. 7 presents the profile of arsenic release from scorodite encapsulated with Al-gels prepared from Na 2 CC>3 or Mg(OH) 2 under oxic (with and without elemental sulfur present) or anoxic (Na 2 S) condition (with or without elemental sulfur present) in water of pH ⁇ 9 compared to release of arsenic under same conditions from naked scorodite; and
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of scorodite particle encapsulated with gel-derived mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxides phases.
  • the inventors have discovered hydrolyzed aluminum gels derived from aluminum sulfate solutions by neutralization with carbonate bases to be highly effective in encapsulating hazardous materials like scorodite particles.
  • the said aluminum gels form a mineralized matrix protecting the scorodite particles from decomposition in alkaline or anoxic waters, hence minimizing release of arsenic.
  • the encapsulation process involves blending scorodite particles with gels prepared with carbonate bases from aluminum sulphate solution and storing the resultant composite that provides protection via the in situ formation of a mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxide matrix.
  • the carbonate base is comprising a carbonate anion (formula: CO3 2" ) or bicarbonate anion (formula: HCO 3 " - also referred to as hydrogen-carbonate ion in the IUPAC system).
  • Suitable carbonates include:
  • the carbonate base is NaHC0 3 or Na 2 C0 3 .
  • the molar ratio of Al:As is ranging from about 1.5 to 0.05; preferably less than about 1, or from about 1.0 to 0.1, or less than about 0.2, or more preferably from about 0.2 to 0.1, and most preferably about 0.1.
  • the concentration of Al(S0 4 ) l 5 in the aqueous medium for preparing the Al gel is ranging from about 0.5 to 3.0M (mol/L) of 1.0 to 3.0 mol/L; preferably, about 1.0 to 2.0, more preferably about 1.5 to 2.0, and most preferably about 2.0.
  • the carbonate bases can be used as powders or suspension/solution.
  • Na 2 C0 3 from about 0.5M to dry powder and preferably about 1.0M to 6M, more preferably about 2M to 4M and most preferably about 2.5 to 3M.
  • NaHC0 3 one can double these numbers, i.e. from about 1M to powder, or about 2M to 12M or about 4M to 8M or most preferably about 5 to 6M.
  • the amount will suitably vary depending on the concentration of Al sulfate solution.
  • the skilled person understands that it may not be desirable to use very dilute solutions of base or AI-SO 4 as this would lead to very liquid-like gel. On the other hand, it may not be desirable to use too concentrated a medium as this leads to immediate solidification (in the form of crushed ice) of the gel, and making more difficult its handling, such as its transportation to the storage site.
  • the temperature range for forming the gel or blending it with the hazardous material is from about 0 to 80°C, or preferably about 10 to 40°C, or more preferably about 15 to 30°C or about 20°C.
  • hazardous materials subjected to stabilization with hydrolyzed aluminum gels as defined herein is not especially limited. Examples include ferric arsenate/scorodite, but however may as well be other arsenical compounds, residues, precipitates or flue dusts such as arsenic sulfides, calcium arsenates or arsenites, mixed calcium arsenates- phosphates, ferrous arsenate, ferric arsenite, arsenic trioxide and so on. Further, the carbonate- derived aluminum gels could be used to provide additional protection to arsenical residues previously stabilized (partially) with conventional cement based methods.
  • the gels could be used for other types of hazardous materials, as is the case for example of antimony, mercury or selenium-containing wastes generated by smelting and other industrial operations.
  • "blending" may involve aging following mixing of the gel and the hazardous arsenical material or not before permanent disposal.
  • Non-limiting examples of aging time may be about one day or from 1 day to 30 days before permanent disposal (storing) of the blended material.
  • aqueous medium can be essentially water, optionally comprising conventional additional components present in the "hazardous materials" subjected to stabilization with hydrolyzed aluminum gels as defined herein.
  • the scorodite substrate material was synthesized by atmospheric precipitation via the use of a seed and supersaturation control method previously developed by the inventors.
  • 0.5 L As(V) - Fe(III) - H 2 S0 4 solutions containing 40 g/L arsenic(V) and iron(III) to arsenic molar ratio of one were placed in a reactor and heated to 95°C.
  • 5 g of hydrothermally produced scorodite were added to the reactor as seed.
  • precipitation started and was allowed to proceed for 24 hours, after which the slurry was filtered using a pressure filter with 0.22 ⁇ pore size membrane filter.
  • TCLP Toxicity Characterization Leachability Procedure-method developed by the Environmental Protection Agency-EPA- of the USA.
  • the freshly washed scorodite particles were subsequently used in aging with aluminum hydroxyl gels. All the reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.
  • Preferred gels were prepared using sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOs) and sodium carbonate (Na 2 CC>3) by partial neutralization of aluminum(III) sulfate solution.
  • magnesium hydroxide also as reference gel
  • sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate powders or previously dissolved or suspended in water (as reported in the specific examples given) were introduced to the prepared Al(S0 4 ) l 5 (typical concentration: 2 mol/L) solutions.
  • Mild stirring had to be applied during mixing as excessive force was found to be counter-productive, causing gel thinning.
  • the freshly prepared aluminum gels were used to stabilize scorodite particles.
  • This anoxic stability test was conducted at adjusted reducing potential (Eh) conditions ( 200 + 20 mV ) via the addition of sodium sulfite (0.15mol/L Na 2 SOs) solution. The pH of the solution was monitored and periodically adjusted to pH 9 ⁇ 0.2 with 0.5 mol/L Ca(OH)2 slurry. Refer to FIG. 1.
  • This anoxic stability test was conducted at adjusted reducing potential (E h ) of 50mV via addition of sodium sulfide solution (0.125M Na 2 S). The pH of the solution was monitored and periodically adjusted to pH 9 ⁇ 0.2 with 0.5 mol/L Ca(OH) 2 slurry. Refer to FIG. 1.
  • ICP-AES Inductively Coupled Plasma- Atomic Emission Spectrometer
  • an aluminum gel of acceptable quality for ageing tests is one that has a sufficiently high initial viscosity (at least 300 cP) to enable solid particles to be blended with the gel without subsequently settling. It is also preferable that the aluminum gel maintains a sufficiently high viscosity for enough time (e.g. 1 to 24 hours) for ease of transportation to storage site before it becomes solidified.
  • Tables 1-4 below summarizes some of the viscosity measurements. The measurements were made with a Brookfield LVDV-E Viscometer apparatus. [0037] Table 1 - NaOH pellets, Na 2 C0 3 , NaHC0 3 powders were introduced to a 2M Al(S0 4 )i.s solution.
  • NaHCC>3 and Na 2 CC>3 provided satisfactory initial viscosities under various reaction conditions except for very dilute (0.5M-Table 3) Al(S04)i.s solution.
  • tests showed gels made with NaOH suffered breakage with time, i.e. water/gel separation (Table 4).
  • scorodite encapsulated with the gel deriving from Na2C03 exhibited a negligible amount of arsenic release after 167 days, and was below the detection limit of the ICP-AES for arsenic (i.e. ⁇ 0.1 mg/L) at a final pH of -7.6. This is significantly lower than the permitted amount of released arsenic in leachate from industrial/mining waste ranging from 1.0 mg/L in certain countries like Japan to 5.0 mg/L in USA. Therefore, these gels display a superior performance for industrial usage. It was also observed that the arsenic released from the two types of hydroxide ions (i.e. NaOH and Mg(OH) 2 ) varied broadly and in an unexpected manner relative to each other.
  • FIG. 3 shows the arsenic release versus time for various aluminum gel/scorodite materials in comparison with scorodite substrate under anoxic environment (chemically generated under Na 2 SOs). It can be seen that the dissolution of scorodite (-137 mg/L in the case of naked mineral) was effectively suppressed with the aid of these aluminum gels encapsulations. The concentration of arsenic released from scorodite encapsulated with particular aluminum gels was reduced by at least one order of magnitude. The scorodite encapsulated with the sodium hydroxide -derived gels had a significantly higher arsenic release.
  • the arsenic released from the scorodite encapsulated with Al-gel derived from NaHC0 3 is no more than 0.1 mg/L and lower than that from Al-gel derived from Na 2 C0 3 .
  • the in-situ mineralization of the hydrolyzed aluminum gel into inert aluminum (oxy)hydroxide crystalline phases as schematically depicted in FIG. 8 provides a protective layer to the scorodite particles, thus preventing their dissolution/decomposition.
  • the mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxide matrix is immune to pH and redox potential swings compared to those caused by the addition of chemical reducing agents, hence greatly enhancing the stabilization of the toxic material.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
  • Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Alkaline-Earth Elements, Aluminum Or Rare-Earth Metals (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne la stabilisation et/ou la solidification de matières dangereuses qui peuvent être générées par des activités telles que des opérations industrielles d'extraction minière, de broyage ou de fusion, par exemple de déchets arsénifères (tels que la scorodite, les sulfures d'arsenic, les arséniates ou les arsenites de calcium, les d'arséniates-phosphates de calcium mixtes, l'arséniate ferreux, l'arsénite ferrique ou le trioxyde d'arsenic), d'antimoine, de déchets contenant du mercure ou du sélénium par l'encapsulation desdits déchets arsénifères dans les produits minéralisés de gels d'aluminium hydrolysés créés par la neutralisation partielle d'Al(SO4)1, 5 par un carbonate.The present invention relates to the stabilization and / or solidification of hazardous materials that can be generated by activities such as industrial mining, milling or melting operations, for example arsenic waste (such as scorodite, sulphides). arsenates or calcium arsenates, mixed calcium arsenate phosphates, ferrous arsenate, ferric arsenite or arsenic trioxide), antimony, mercury-containing wastes or selenium by encapsulating said arsenic waste in the mineralized hydrolysed aluminum gel products created by the partial neutralization of Al (SO4) 1, 5 with a carbonate.

Description

STABILIZATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
[001] This invention relates to stabilization / solidification of hazardous materials and, in particular, arsenical wastes through encapsulation with mineralized products of hydrolyzed aluminum gels.
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
[002] Hazardous materials generated by different industries call for treatment and containment in waste management facilities to ensure that there is no release to the environment of toxic elements. Arsenic is a major environmental hazard in many mining, milling or smelting operations that requires proper immobilization and disposal. Among the preferred treatment approaches to the arsenic problem in the minerals/metals industry is to co-precipitate it to iron- arsenate solids by neutralization with lime. While this route may be suitable for dilute sources of arsenic, it is not amenable to arsenic-rich sources. In the latter case, the immobilization of arsenic - released during pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical processing of arsenic-containing ores - in the form of scorodite (FeAs04 - 2H20 ) is advocated due to its high arsenic content (-23%) and relatively low solubility. A special issue related to the stability of scorodite, however, is its decomposition under alkaline (pH>7) and anaerobic/anoxic conditions that may develop over time if not properly disposed.
[003] Stabilization/solidification (S/S) is an approach used for the fixation of toxic waste materials of various types and sources. An example of such a process involves the mixing of a toxic waste with cement and/or other binder materials to produce a chemically and physically stable solid mass suitable for use in the landfill. Amongst the most common technologies currently used for the stabilization/solidification of hazardous wastes are those based upon hydraulic cement and/or slaked lime and, less commonly, organic polymers, sulphur polymer cement, and other encapsulation materials.
[004] Stabilization/solidification of arsenic -containing compounds using Portland cement could reduce the mobility of arsenic by formation of insoluble hydroxides, carbonates, or silicate providing sorption; or simply physical encapsulation. However, cement-based stabilization/solidification is not a robust long-term option for iron arsenate type solids like scorodite because the process creates a highly alkaline environment (pH -12.5) that would lead to the release of arsenic.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[005] In one aspect, there is provided a method for the stabilization of hazardous materials comprising:
a) forming a hydrolyzed aluminum gel by partial neutralizing, in an aqueous medium, Al(S04)i.5 with a carbonate base;
b) blending said hydrolyzed aluminum gel and hazardous material; and
c) storing said blend from the preceding step to obtain a mineralized aluminum (oxy) hydroxide/hazardous material composite.
[006] In a further aspect, there is provided the use of carbonate base (such as NaHC03 or Na2COs) -derived hydrolyzed aluminum gels and their mineralized products in stabilization of hazardous materials.
[007] In a further aspect, there is provided a composite comprising scorodite particles and a gel-derived solidified matrix comprising aluminum (oxy)hydroxide mineral phases. [008] In a further aspect, there is provided a composite prepared by the method as defined herein.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[009] Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be illustrated with reference to the attached Figures, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a graph of the evolution profiles of pH and Eh with time during stability testing of scorodite-gel blends using either Na2S03 (top) or Na2S (bottom) to adjust Eh;
FIG. 2 depicts arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from reference bases NaOH and Mg(OH)2 , compared to a carbonate base
( Na2C03 ) of this disclosure, under oxic condition;
FIG. 3 depicts arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from reference bases NaOH and Mg(OH)2 , compared to a carbonate base
( Na2C03 ) of this disclosure under anoxic condition;
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the arsenic release from naked scorodite and scorodite encapsulated with Al-gels prepared from NaOH, Na2C03 and NaHC03 under anoxic (Na2S03) condition and pH~9;
FIG. 5. represents the arsenic release from scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from Na2C03 and NaHC03 under anoxic condition chemically generated with Na2S; FIG. 6 depicts XRD patterns of Na2C03 derived aluminum gels after 167 days stability testing under oxic and anoxic conditions;
FIG. 7 presents the profile of arsenic release from scorodite encapsulated with Al-gels prepared from Na2CC>3 or Mg(OH)2 under oxic (with and without elemental sulfur present) or anoxic (Na2S) condition (with or without elemental sulfur present) in water of pH~9 compared to release of arsenic under same conditions from naked scorodite; and
FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of scorodite particle encapsulated with gel-derived mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxides phases.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0010] The inventors have discovered hydrolyzed aluminum gels derived from aluminum sulfate solutions by neutralization with carbonate bases to be highly effective in encapsulating hazardous materials like scorodite particles. The said aluminum gels form a mineralized matrix protecting the scorodite particles from decomposition in alkaline or anoxic waters, hence minimizing release of arsenic.
[0011] The encapsulation process involves blending scorodite particles with gels prepared with carbonate bases from aluminum sulphate solution and storing the resultant composite that provides protection via the in situ formation of a mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxide matrix.
[0012] The stability of encapsulated scorodite was examined in the laboratory by performing leachability tests under alkaline (pH 8-9) oxic or chemical reducing (anoxic) conditions, demonstrating effectiveness in curtailing arsenic release. [0013] In one embodiment, the carbonate base is comprising a carbonate anion (formula: CO32" ) or bicarbonate anion (formula: HCO3 " - also referred to as hydrogen-carbonate ion in the IUPAC system).
[0014] Suitable carbonates include:
carbonates Li2C03, Na2C03, K2CO3, etc.
Alkali metals
bicarbonates L1HCO3, NaHC03, KHCO3, etc. carbonates MgC03, etc.
Alkaline earth metals
bicarbonates Mg(HC03)2, etc.
carbonates ZnC03, FeC03, etc.
Other metals
bicarbonates Zn(HC03)2, Fe(HC03)2, etc.
[0015] In one embodiment, the carbonate base is NaHC03 or Na2C03.
[0016] In one embodiment, the molar ratio of Al:As (Al from Al(S04 5 and As from scorodite) is ranging from about 1.5 to 0.05; preferably less than about 1, or from about 1.0 to 0.1, or less than about 0.2, or more preferably from about 0.2 to 0.1, and most preferably about 0.1.
[0017] In one embodiment, the concentration of Al(S04)l 5 in the aqueous medium for preparing the Al gel is ranging from about 0.5 to 3.0M (mol/L) of 1.0 to 3.0 mol/L; preferably, about 1.0 to 2.0, more preferably about 1.5 to 2.0, and most preferably about 2.0.
[0018] The carbonate bases can be used as powders or suspension/solution. In the case of Na2C03, from about 0.5M to dry powder and preferably about 1.0M to 6M, more preferably about 2M to 4M and most preferably about 2.5 to 3M. In the case of NaHC03, one can double these numbers, i.e. from about 1M to powder, or about 2M to 12M or about 4M to 8M or most preferably about 5 to 6M. The amount will suitably vary depending on the concentration of Al sulfate solution. The skilled person understands that it may not be desirable to use very dilute solutions of base or AI-SO4 as this would lead to very liquid-like gel. On the other hand, it may not be desirable to use too concentrated a medium as this leads to immediate solidification (in the form of crushed ice) of the gel, and making more difficult its handling, such as its transportation to the storage site.
[0019] In one embodiment, the molar ratios of carbonate bases to Al is between about 2<0.5CO3 2"=HCO3 "/Al < about 3 or preferentially between about 2.2 and 2.8 or more preferentially about 2.4 to 2.6 and most preferably about 2.5.
[0020] In one embodiment, the temperature range for forming the gel or blending it with the hazardous material is from about 0 to 80°C, or preferably about 10 to 40°C, or more preferably about 15 to 30°C or about 20°C.
[0021] As used herein, "hazardous materials" subjected to stabilization with hydrolyzed aluminum gels as defined herein is not especially limited. Examples include ferric arsenate/scorodite, but however may as well be other arsenical compounds, residues, precipitates or flue dusts such as arsenic sulfides, calcium arsenates or arsenites, mixed calcium arsenates- phosphates, ferrous arsenate, ferric arsenite, arsenic trioxide and so on. Further, the carbonate- derived aluminum gels could be used to provide additional protection to arsenical residues previously stabilized (partially) with conventional cement based methods. Finally, the gels could be used for other types of hazardous materials, as is the case for example of antimony, mercury or selenium-containing wastes generated by smelting and other industrial operations. [0022] As used herein, "blending" may involve aging following mixing of the gel and the hazardous arsenical material or not before permanent disposal. Non-limiting examples of aging time may be about one day or from 1 day to 30 days before permanent disposal (storing) of the blended material.
[0023] As used herein, "aqueous medium" can be essentially water, optionally comprising conventional additional components present in the "hazardous materials" subjected to stabilization with hydrolyzed aluminum gels as defined herein.
Experimental
Preparation of Scorodite
[0024] The scorodite substrate material was synthesized by atmospheric precipitation via the use of a seed and supersaturation control method previously developed by the inventors. In this procedure, 0.5 L As(V) - Fe(III) - H2S04 solutions containing 40 g/L arsenic(V) and iron(III) to arsenic molar ratio of one were placed in a reactor and heated to 95°C. When the temperature inside the reactor reached ~65°C and the pH had dropped to 0.45, 5 g of hydrothermally produced scorodite were added to the reactor as seed. In the presence of seed, precipitation started and was allowed to proceed for 24 hours, after which the slurry was filtered using a pressure filter with 0.22 μπι pore size membrane filter. Solids were then subjected to several washing and consecutive TCLP-type washing steps (TCLP stands for Toxicity Characterization Leachability Procedure-method developed by the Environmental Protection Agency-EPA- of the USA). The freshly washed scorodite particles were subsequently used in aging with aluminum hydroxyl gels. All the reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.
Synthesis of Aluminum Gels
[0025] Preferred gels were prepared using sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOs) and sodium carbonate (Na2CC>3) by partial neutralization of aluminum(III) sulfate solution. Aluminum gels derived from NaOH (as reference gel) were produced by partial (molar ratio OH:Al = 2.5) quick neutralization of 2 mol/L Al(S04)l 5 solutions with 5.0 mol/L NaOH at room temperature. For producing the other two types of gels, magnesium hydroxide (also as reference gel), sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate, powders or previously dissolved or suspended in water (as reported in the specific examples given) were introduced to the prepared Al(S04)l 5 (typical concentration: 2 mol/L) solutions. Mild stirring had to be applied during mixing as excessive force was found to be counter-productive, causing gel thinning. The freshly prepared aluminum gels were used to stabilize scorodite particles.
Blending of Scorodite with Aluminum Gels
[0026] The scorodite and aluminum-based gels were blended together and subsequently allowed to age at room temperature for 7 days. A low gel/scorodite ratio ( Al : As = 0 . 1 molar basis) was applied for blending the two products. The procedure involved aging the blends in sealed Erlenmeyer flasks before initiating stability testing.
Stability Testing
[0027] The scorodite-gel blends were subjected to stability testing - alongside naked scorodite as control - in pH 8-9 water under oxic and anoxic (using Na2S or Na2SC>3 chemicals as reducing agents) conditions. In addition to the carbonate -based gels disclosed herein, reference examples were prepared from NaOH and Mg(OH)2 neutralized gels. Solids were placed in sealed 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 100 mL of de-ionized water and agitated with an orbital shaker over extended periods of time while regularly adjusting pH and oxidation-reduction (Eh) potential to monitor the release of arsenic via sampling and ICP analysis. The liquid to solid ratio (L/S) was kept at 20 for all tests. Typical pH and Eh evolution data during stability testing are shown in FIG 1. Oxic Stability Test
[0028] The stability of various materials was studied as a function of time under oxidizing conditions at room temperature. The stability was evaluated by equilibrating these solids in de- ionized water that was initially adjusted to pH = 9 ± 0.2 with 0.5 mol/L Ca(OH)2 slurry. The system pH was allowed to drift down to pH = -7.5 and subsequently readjusted. Refer to FIG. 1.
Anoxic Stability Test (Na?SC
[0029] This anoxic stability test was conducted at adjusted reducing potential (Eh) conditions ( 200 + 20 mV ) via the addition of sodium sulfite (0.15mol/L Na2SOs) solution. The pH of the solution was monitored and periodically adjusted to pH 9 ± 0.2 with 0.5 mol/L Ca(OH)2 slurry. Refer to FIG. 1.
Anoxic Stability Test (Na?S)
[0030] This anoxic stability test was conducted at adjusted reducing potential (Eh) of 50mV via addition of sodium sulfide solution (0.125M Na2S). The pH of the solution was monitored and periodically adjusted to pH 9 ± 0.2 with 0.5 mol/L Ca(OH)2 slurry. Refer to FIG. 1.
[0031] For both oxic and anoxic tests, samples were taken on a regular basis with 10 mL plastic syringes, which were filtered with a 28 mm diameter syringe filter with 0.2 um pore size and diluted with acidified ( HNO 3 ) de-ionized water in preparation for chemical analysis. The measurement of the pH was achieved with a refillable double -junction electrode with an accuracy of ± 0.1 pH units. The Eh was measured using a platinum single -junction combination electrode (Agl AgCl) with a reported accuracy of ± 20 mV. All experiments were performed at room temperature (22 °C). Analysis and Characterization
[0032] The concentrations of arsenic in aqueous samples were analyzed using an Inductively Coupled Plasma- Atomic Emission Spectrometer (ICP-AES). Chemical analysis of solids was performed by ICP-AES following their acidic digestion.
[0033] Powders were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction using a X-ray diffractometer (D8 Discover Bruker) with Cu K a radiation (λ= 1.5405 A).
Results and Discussion
Encapsulating material
[0034] For the context of scorodite encapsulation/stabilization, an aluminum gel of acceptable quality for ageing tests is one that has a sufficiently high initial viscosity (at least 300 cP) to enable solid particles to be blended with the gel without subsequently settling. It is also preferable that the aluminum gel maintains a sufficiently high viscosity for enough time (e.g. 1 to 24 hours) for ease of transportation to storage site before it becomes solidified.
[0035] In the following examples, the preparation of Al-gel was conducted via the partial quick neutralization (molar ratio 0.5CO32"=HCO3"/Al = 2.5) of Al(S04)i.s solution with the base at room temperature. The resulting mixture was mildly stirred until a gel-like consistency was achieved.
[0036] Tables 1-4 below summarizes some of the viscosity measurements. The measurements were made with a Brookfield LVDV-E Viscometer apparatus. [0037] Table 1 - NaOH pellets, Na2C03, NaHC03 powders were introduced to a 2M Al(S04)i.s solution.
Figure imgf000013_0001
[0040] Table 4 - Solutions of 5.0M NaOH, 2.5M Na2C03, and 5.0M NaHC03 suspension were introduced to a 2M Al(S04)i.s solution.
Figure imgf000014_0001
[0041] As shown in Tables 1 to 4, NaHCC>3 and Na2CC>3 provided satisfactory initial viscosities under various reaction conditions except for very dilute (0.5M-Table 3) Al(S04)i.s solution. In addition, tests showed gels made with NaOH suffered breakage with time, i.e. water/gel separation (Table 4).
[0042] For each aluminum gel (NaOH , Mg(OH)2 , and Na2C03 ), the corresponding X-ray diffraction pattern was generated. It was observed that all the gels after washing and drying exhibit an identical X-ray diffractogram revealing an amorphous nature. No crystalline compound containing aluminum could be confirmed.
Stability under Oxidizing Environment
[0043] The arsenic release in terms of As concentration as a function of time for the scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels made with three different bases, Na2C03, NaOH, or Mg(OH)2 along with the atmospherically produced scorodite control material is shown in FIG. 2. It is observed that arsenic release was effectively reduced by the encapsulation with hydrolyzed aluminum gels. The release of arsenic from scorodite substrate was in the order of 8.8 mg/L at pH 7.1 after 167 days of stability testing. Specifically, scorodite encapsulated with the gel deriving from Na2C03 exhibited a negligible amount of arsenic release after 167 days, and was below the detection limit of the ICP-AES for arsenic (i.e. < 0.1 mg/L) at a final pH of -7.6. This is significantly lower than the permitted amount of released arsenic in leachate from industrial/mining waste ranging from 1.0 mg/L in certain countries like Japan to 5.0 mg/L in USA. Therefore, these gels display a superior performance for industrial usage. It was also observed that the arsenic released from the two types of hydroxide ions (i.e. NaOH and Mg(OH)2) varied broadly and in an unexpected manner relative to each other.
Stability under Anoxic Environment
[0044] FIG. 3 shows the arsenic release versus time for various aluminum gel/scorodite materials in comparison with scorodite substrate under anoxic environment (chemically generated under Na2SOs). It can be seen that the dissolution of scorodite (-137 mg/L in the case of naked mineral) was effectively suppressed with the aid of these aluminum gels encapsulations. The concentration of arsenic released from scorodite encapsulated with particular aluminum gels was reduced by at least one order of magnitude. The scorodite encapsulated with the sodium hydroxide -derived gels had a significantly higher arsenic release. For example, the NaOH- derived gel released 4.2 mg/L (at pH = 8.3) compared to the sodium carbonate gel showing 2.7 mg/L (at pH = 8.7) after 167 days. The magnesium hydroxide gel sample had an arsenic release of 19.9 mg/L (at pH = 8.4). Therefore, once again, it was observed that the arsenic released from the two types of alkaline ions (OH" vs. C03 2" or HC03 ") varied broadly.
[0045] A similar trend (i.e. carbonate gels better than NaOH gel) was observed in another series summarized with the data in FIG. 4. It can be seen that the scorodite encapsulated with the gels generated with the two carbonate bases released less arsenic (0.2-0.5 mg/L As) than the sample with the gel made with NaOH (1.7 mg/L As) after 62 days of contact with water. By comparison, the release of arsenic from naked scorodite under the same anoxic (Na2S03, pH ~9) condition was 17 mg/L. [0046] FIG. 5 shows the arsenic released from scorodite encapsulated with aluminum gels derived from Na2CC>3 and NaHC03 under anoxic conditions (chemically generated with Na2S). During the 30-day stability test, the arsenic released from the scorodite encapsulated with Al-gel derived from NaHC03 is no more than 0.1 mg/L and lower than that from Al-gel derived from Na2C03.
[0047] Further evidence of the effectiveness of hydrolyzed aluminum gels generated with a carbonate base (this time Na2CC>3) is provided with the data of FIG. 7. It can be seen that the encapsulation of scorodite with Al-gels improves its stability in both oxic and anoxic conditions. In this case, Na2S was used as reducing agent and the pH was ~9. The current results show that scorodite encapsulated with the Na2CC>3 Al-gel -prepared by addition of Na2CC>3 powder into 2M Al(S04)i.5 solution- has released less arsenic (-0.5 mg/L) than "naked" scorodite by a whole order of magnitude. Moreover, the stability of Al-Gels hydrolyzed using Na2CC>3 performed better than Mg(OH)2 based gels. In some tests elemental sulfur -a common ingredient in some industrial arsenical residues- was added to assess possible adverse effect on stability without such evidence.
Post Stability Testing Characterization
[0048] XRD analysis of the Na2C03 -derived aluminum gels before and after stability testing demonstrated a transformation of the amorphous aluminum gel into mineralized crystalline AIOOH or Al(OH)3 phases (FIG. 6). Patterns of the Na2C03 -derived aluminum gels exhibit an amorphous nature with broad peaks appearing at approximately 2 Θ = 20 °,40 °,60 ° . After 167 days stability testing under oxic conditions, sharp lines developed that were entirely due to the amorphous-to-crystalline phase transformation. The amorphous aluminum gel was converted into a mineralized matrix made of gibbsite and bayerite Al(OH crystalline phases. [0049] In the meantime the aluminum gels after 167 days stability testing under chemically generated anoxic condition had also converted into mineralized phases; this time matching the boehmite (AIOOH) crystalline phase.
[0050] The in-situ mineralization of the hydrolyzed aluminum gel into inert aluminum (oxy)hydroxide crystalline phases as schematically depicted in FIG. 8 provides a protective layer to the scorodite particles, thus preventing their dissolution/decomposition. The mineralized aluminum (oxy)hydroxide matrix is immune to pH and redox potential swings compared to those caused by the addition of chemical reducing agents, hence greatly enhancing the stabilization of the toxic material.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A method for the stabilization of hazardous materials comprising:
a) forming a hydrolyzed aluminum gel by partial neutralizing, in an aqueous medium, Al(S04)i.s with a carbonate base;
b) blending said hydrolyzed aluminum gel and hazardous material; and
c) storing said blend from the preceding step to obtain a mineralized aluminum (oxy) hydroxide/hazardous material composite.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of forming said hydrolyzed aluminum gel is comprising adding said carbonate base to an aqueous medium comprising said Al(S04)i.s.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the concentration of Al(S04)l 5 in the aqueous medium is from about 1.0 to 3.0 mol/L.
4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said carbonate base is NaHCC>3 or Na2C03.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said carbonate base is Na2CC>3 powder or NaHCC>3 powder.
6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said carbonate base is a suspension/solution of Na2CC>3 at a concentration of about 2M to 4M or of NaHCC>3 at a concentration of about 4M to 8M.
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said carbonate base is present at a molar ratio of carbonate base to Al of between about 2<0.5CO3 2"=HCO3 "/Al < about 3.
8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said hazardous material is comprising arsenic (As), and in said step of blending said hydrolyzed aluminum gel and said hazardous material, the aluminum to arsenic molar ratio is lower than about 1.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said hazardous material is arsenical waste generated by mining, milling or smelting industrial operations.
10. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said hazardous material is ferric arsenate known as scorodite (FeAs04.2H20).
11. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said hazardous material is arsenic sulfides, calcium arsenates or arsenites, mixed calcium arsenates-phosphates, ferrous arsenate, ferric arsenite, or arsenic trioxide.
12. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said hazardous material is an antimony, mercury or selenium-containing waste.
13. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein after said blending, the resulting blend is aged for one to seven days before said step of storing.
14. The use of carbonate base (NaHC03 or Na2COs) derived hydrolyzed aluminum gels and their mineralized products in stabilization of hazardous materials.
15. A composite comprising scorodite particles and a gel-derived solidified matrix comprising aluminum (oxy)hydroxide mineral phases.
16. The composite of claim 15, wherein said phase is comprising crystalline and poorly crystalline AIOOH (boehmite and pseudoboehmite) or the polymorphs of Al(OH)3 gibbsite, bayerite and nordstrandite.
17. The composite of claim 16, wherein said AIOOH or Al(OH>3 mineral phases are obtainable from hydrolyzed aluminum sulfate gels produced by partial neutralization with a carbonate base.
PCT/CA2018/050790 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials Ceased WO2019000091A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA3096126A CA3096126A1 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials
MX2020000165A MX2020000165A (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials.
JP2019571443A JP7265267B6 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of harmful substances
EP18823982.6A EP3645132A4 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 STABILIZATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PE2019002680A PE20200766A1 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 STABILIZATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
AU2018292424A AU2018292424B2 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials
CN201880049403.1A CN110944724B (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762526511P 2017-06-29 2017-06-29
US62/526,511 2017-06-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019000091A1 true WO2019000091A1 (en) 2019-01-03

Family

ID=64740780

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2018/050790 Ceased WO2019000091A1 (en) 2017-06-29 2018-06-27 Stabilization of hazardous materials

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3645132A4 (en)
JP (1) JP7265267B6 (en)
CN (1) CN110944724B (en)
AU (1) AU2018292424B2 (en)
CA (1) CA3096126A1 (en)
CL (1) CL2019003807A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2020000165A (en)
PE (1) PE20200766A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2019000091A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111069228A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-28 昆明理工大学 Method for wrapping stabilized scorodite by copper slag gel
CN112718793A (en) * 2020-12-15 2021-04-30 紫金矿业集团股份有限公司 Method for directly vitrifying arsenic-fixing material containing arsenite
WO2024207127A1 (en) * 2023-04-06 2024-10-10 Ecometales Limited Procedure for the stabilization of arsenic by precipitation of ferric arsenate in mixtures with aluminum gel
US12252412B2 (en) 2019-05-28 2025-03-18 The Royal Institution For The Advancement Of Learning/Mcgill University Method for producing scorodite
CN120943485A (en) * 2025-10-15 2025-11-14 中铝山东新材料有限公司 Treatment method of carbonate-containing alkaline washing liquid

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5859306A (en) 1995-05-26 1999-01-12 Rmt, Inc. Method of treating arsenic-contaminated matter using aluminum compounds
US7445718B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2008-11-04 The Board Of Regents Of The Nevada Systems Of Higher Education On Behalf Of The University Of Nevada, Reno Removal of arsenic from drinking and process water
JP2012240017A (en) 2011-05-23 2012-12-10 Nittetsu Kankyo Engineering Kk Treating material of harmful substance, and treating method of harmful substance
US20160222291A1 (en) 2013-10-28 2016-08-04 Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd. Insolubilizing material for specific hazardous substance and method for insolubilizing specific hazardous substance with same

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53144872A (en) * 1977-05-25 1978-12-16 Takenaka Komuten Co Solidification method* solidifying agent and additive aid for wastes
JPS5496250A (en) * 1978-08-25 1979-07-30 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Solidification of waste, solidifier agent, and additives
CN1105693C (en) * 1997-05-29 2003-04-16 多乐麦曲克斯国际有限公司 Containment of Hazardous Waste
EP0989965A4 (en) * 1997-05-29 2000-11-02 Periclase Pty Ltd CAPSULE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
US6254312B1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-07-03 Rmt, Inc. Stabilization of arsenic-contaminated materials
US6843617B2 (en) * 1998-06-18 2005-01-18 Rmt, Inc. Stabilization of toxic metals in a waste matrix and pore water
AUPS200702A0 (en) * 2002-04-29 2002-06-06 Dolomatrix International Limited Treatment of hazardous waste material
JP4718155B2 (en) * 2004-10-06 2011-07-06 水澤化学工業株式会社 Method for producing deodorant composite composition
JP5069154B2 (en) * 2008-03-11 2012-11-07 電気化学工業株式会社 Porous purification material and purification method using porous filter using the same
AR074321A1 (en) * 2008-11-11 2011-01-05 Molycorp Minerals Llc REMOVAL OF OBJECTIVE MATERIALS USING RARE LAND METALS
JP2011184266A (en) * 2010-03-10 2011-09-22 Dowa Metals & Mining Co Ltd Method for treating iron arsenate particle
CN101863565B (en) * 2010-03-23 2012-07-25 中国地质大学(武汉) Earth surface depth treatment method of high-arsenic underground water and system thereof
CN102336461A (en) * 2010-07-27 2012-02-01 中国科学院过程工程研究所 Method for removing metal ions from aqueous solution by use of hydrotalcite
JP5599061B2 (en) * 2010-10-25 2014-10-01 太平洋セメント株式会社 Neutral solidifying material additive, neutral solidifying material and method for suppressing elution of heavy metals
CN102249609B (en) * 2011-04-29 2013-06-12 昆明理工大学 Arsenic-containing waste slag solidified body and preparation method thereof
JP6241661B2 (en) * 2013-03-29 2017-12-06 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Arsenic separation and immobilization method
CN103316904A (en) * 2013-04-10 2013-09-25 天津市环境保护科学研究院 Repairing method of chromium polluted soil
CN103553197B (en) * 2013-11-05 2014-12-31 红河学院 Method for removing arsenic and antimony in industrial wastewater by using smelting furnace slag
CN103952207B (en) * 2014-04-08 2015-07-15 重庆大学 Arsenic-fixing agent and preparation method thereof, and method utilizing arsenic-fixing agent to fix arsenic
CN104774619B (en) * 2015-02-13 2017-12-26 湖南永清环保研究院有限责任公司 It is a kind of for the solidification stabilizer of As polluted soil and its application
CN106242121A (en) * 2016-09-05 2016-12-21 吉林市润成膜科技有限公司 A kind of composite drug preparation method removing arsenic in water

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5859306A (en) 1995-05-26 1999-01-12 Rmt, Inc. Method of treating arsenic-contaminated matter using aluminum compounds
US7445718B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2008-11-04 The Board Of Regents Of The Nevada Systems Of Higher Education On Behalf Of The University Of Nevada, Reno Removal of arsenic from drinking and process water
JP2012240017A (en) 2011-05-23 2012-12-10 Nittetsu Kankyo Engineering Kk Treating material of harmful substance, and treating method of harmful substance
US20160222291A1 (en) 2013-10-28 2016-08-04 Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd. Insolubilizing material for specific hazardous substance and method for insolubilizing specific hazardous substance with same

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12252412B2 (en) 2019-05-28 2025-03-18 The Royal Institution For The Advancement Of Learning/Mcgill University Method for producing scorodite
CN111069228A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-28 昆明理工大学 Method for wrapping stabilized scorodite by copper slag gel
CN112718793A (en) * 2020-12-15 2021-04-30 紫金矿业集团股份有限公司 Method for directly vitrifying arsenic-fixing material containing arsenite
WO2024207127A1 (en) * 2023-04-06 2024-10-10 Ecometales Limited Procedure for the stabilization of arsenic by precipitation of ferric arsenate in mixtures with aluminum gel
CN120943485A (en) * 2025-10-15 2025-11-14 中铝山东新材料有限公司 Treatment method of carbonate-containing alkaline washing liquid

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA3096126A1 (en) 2019-01-03
JP7265267B2 (en) 2023-04-26
CN110944724A (en) 2020-03-31
JP2020525121A (en) 2020-08-27
CL2019003807A1 (en) 2020-08-14
AU2018292424B2 (en) 2023-09-28
EP3645132A4 (en) 2021-03-03
EP3645132A1 (en) 2020-05-06
MX2020000165A (en) 2020-07-22
JP7265267B6 (en) 2023-05-19
AU2018292424A1 (en) 2020-02-13
CN110944724B (en) 2022-08-26
PE20200766A1 (en) 2020-07-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2018292424B2 (en) Stabilization of hazardous materials
Duarte et al. Hazardous elements and amorphous nanoparticles in historical estuary coal mining area
Chen et al. A cleaning process for the removal and stabilisation of arsenic from arsenic-rich lead anode slime
Liang et al. Effect of strong acids on red mud structural and fluoride adsorption properties
US6197201B1 (en) Process for removal and stabilization of arsenic and selenium from aqueous streams and slurries
Li et al. Alkaline oxidative pressure leaching of arsenic and antimony bearing dusts
JP5913436B2 (en) Boron remover
CN104098237A (en) Sludge or soil treatment method and heavy metal component stabilizing agent
Ma et al. A novel method for preparing an As (V) solution for scorodite synthesis from an arsenic sulphide residue in a Pb refinery
Petrik et al. Utilization of South African fly ash to treat acid coal mine drainage, and production of high quality zeolites from the residual solids
Papassiopi et al. Removal and fixation of arsenic in the form of ferric arsenates. Three parallel experimental studies
Wang et al. A novel method for in situ stabilization of calcium arsenic residues via yukonite formation
Kuchar et al. Sulfidation treatment of molten incineration fly ashes with Na2S for zinc, lead and copper resource recovery
Li et al. A new strategy to stabilize the heavy metals in carbonized MSWI-fly ash using an acid-resistant oligomeric dithiocarbamate chelator
JP6699388B2 (en) Mine wastewater treatment method
JP2008200635A (en) Treatment method after iron arsenic reaction
ES3011207T3 (en) Method for stabilizing metallic mercury
JP2010082497A (en) Water treating agent and method for treating water
de Almeida Silva et al. Production of Iron pigments (Goethite and Haematite) from acid mine drainage
CA3076824C (en) Method and reagent system for treating mercury-contaminated material
Mothetha et al. Application of Pulverized Kaolin Clay for Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage
KR100838309B1 (en) How to Stabilize Arsenic Contaminants
Gontijo et al. Low-cost lanthanides and metalloid removal: Implications on arsenic mobility and bioaccessibility
Rubinos¹ et al. Neutralization and decontamination of acid leachates using bauxite red mud
CA3256748A1 (en) Procedure for the stabilization of arsenic by precipitation of ferric arsenate in mixtures with aluminum gel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18823982

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2019571443

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018823982

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20200129

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018292424

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20180627

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 3096126

Country of ref document: CA

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: MX/A/2020/000165

Country of ref document: MX