[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2018191385A1 - System and method for monitoring psa bed health - Google Patents

System and method for monitoring psa bed health Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018191385A1
WO2018191385A1 PCT/US2018/027122 US2018027122W WO2018191385A1 WO 2018191385 A1 WO2018191385 A1 WO 2018191385A1 US 2018027122 W US2018027122 W US 2018027122W WO 2018191385 A1 WO2018191385 A1 WO 2018191385A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bed
molecular sieve
oxygen concentration
oxygen
psa
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2018/027122
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Steven C. Peake
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mission Systems Davenport Inc
Original Assignee
Carleton Life Support Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carleton Life Support Systems Inc filed Critical Carleton Life Support Systems Inc
Publication of WO2018191385A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018191385A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62BDEVICES, APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR LIFE-SAVING
    • A62B27/00Methods or devices for testing respiratory or breathing apparatus for high altitudes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/02Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
    • B01D53/04Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
    • B01D53/0454Controlling adsorption
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61MDEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
    • A61M16/00Devices for influencing the respiratory system of patients by gas treatment, e.g. ventilators; Tracheal tubes
    • A61M16/10Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours
    • A61M16/1005Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours with O2 features or with parameter measurement
    • A61M16/101Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours with O2 features or with parameter measurement using an oxygen concentrator
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/02Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
    • B01D53/04Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
    • B01D53/047Pressure swing adsorption
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61MDEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
    • A61M16/00Devices for influencing the respiratory system of patients by gas treatment, e.g. ventilators; Tracheal tubes
    • A61M16/10Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours
    • A61M16/1005Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours with O2 features or with parameter measurement
    • A61M2016/102Measuring a parameter of the content of the delivered gas
    • A61M2016/1025Measuring a parameter of the content of the delivered gas the O2 concentration
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62BDEVICES, APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR LIFE-SAVING
    • A62B7/00Respiratory apparatus
    • A62B7/14Respiratory apparatus for high-altitude aircraft
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2256/00Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
    • B01D2256/12Oxygen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/10Single element gases other than halogens
    • B01D2257/102Nitrogen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/402Further details for adsorption processes and devices using two beds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/45Gas separation or purification devices adapted for specific applications
    • B01D2259/4566Gas separation or purification devices adapted for specific applications for use in transportation means
    • B01D2259/4575Gas separation or purification devices adapted for specific applications for use in transportation means in aeroplanes or space ships

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to pressure swing adsorption systems, and more particularly to a system and method of monitoring the health of the molecular sieve beds used within a pressure swing adsorption system.
  • PSA Pressure Swing Absorption
  • zeolite molecular sieve material
  • the adsorbed nitrogen may be periodically purged from the zeolite under reduced pressure (e.g., at ambient pressure) by using pressure swing techniques in a known manner. The purged nitrogen is then either dumped overboard or used for other purposes, such as inerting the fuel tank ullage of the aircraft.
  • the present invention is generally directed to a system for monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system
  • PSA pressure swing adsorption
  • An oxygen sensor coupled to an outlet of the PSA system.
  • the oxygen sensor measures an oxygen concentration of an output air produced by the molecular sieve bed.
  • a controller is in communication with the oxygen sensor and records a series of oxygen concentrations over time. The controller is configured to determine bed health based upon the series of recorded oxygen concentrations.
  • a method of monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system of an on-board oxygen generating system includes a) powering the OBOGS; b) passing feed air into a first molecular sieve bed of the PSA system to produce an output gas; c) measuring an oxygen concentration of the output gas; d) cycling the PSA system to produce an oxygen-enriched output gas; e) measure the oxygen concentration of the oxygen-enriched output gas at regular time intervals until the oxygen concentration reaches a predetermined level; f) determining a length of time for the PSA system to reach the predetermined oxygen concentration; g) compare the length of time against a performance curve; and h) determine the bed health as a function of step g).
  • PSA pressure swing adsorption
  • OOGS on-board oxygen generating system
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for monitoring the health of a molecular sieve bed within a PSA system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic of an exemplary system for monitoring the health of a molecular sieve bed within a PSA system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a plot of a series of PSA molecular sieve bed units showing percent oxygen concentration as a function of time.
  • a method 10 for monitoring the health of a Pressure Swing Absorption (PSA) bed generally utilizes the inherent recovery time of the PSA bed to concentrate the desired gas to measure the health or amount of degradation that has occurred within the bed.
  • PSA Pressure Swing Absorption
  • method 10 may be implemented during the initial power up sequence of the PSA system prior to each flight operation. It should be noted that method 10 may also be implemented at other times, such as during routine maintenance, to decrease the test time and complexity of bed health testing.
  • employment of method 10 during power up of the aircraft is especially important to aircraft operations since it provides an assessment of the PSA performance prior to any flight operations. Continuing the aircraft example and as shown in FIG.
  • an On Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) 100 with a PSA system 102 is configured to generate an output gas 104 having a high concentration of oxygen gas for ultimate delivery to pilots and crew 106, particularly when the aircraft is at high altitude.
  • OBOGS 100 may go through a warm-up period as part of aircraft startup and checkout prior to any flight.
  • method 10 may be employed during the PBIT or other initiation sequence and may provide a reading of the health of the PSA bed unit while the aircraft is on the ground. Proper decisions can then be made regarding risk of a fault of the OBOGS 100 and/or PSA system 102 during the flight or mission of the aircraft.
  • Exemplary method 10 may be used with an OBOGS 100 to monitor (such as via oxygen sensor 108) the oxygen concentration of output gas 104 exiting OBOGS outlet 110 in real time while the operating conditions of the PSA are varied. It should be noted that the following discussion will be directed to a PSA system employing two beds 112, 114. In this instance, one bed is typically under pressure to produce the desired product gas (oxygen, 02) while the other bed is undergoing desorption of adsorbed gas (i.e., nitrogen, N2) at lower (i.e. ambient) pressure. However, one skilled in the art should recognize that method 10 may be used for a 3 or more bed system with appropriate adaptions to account for the additional beds. It should be further noted that, for aircraft applications, it is important that method 10 be inhibited when the aircraft the crew is reliant on the oxygen concentration for breathing, such as when at altitude. Thus, method 10 may be disabled when the aircraft is not on the ground.
  • method 10 may initiate upon aircraft startup (step 12) with controller 116 instructing OBOGS 100 to cycle the two-beds 112, 114 of PSA unit 102 at its typical duty cycle, for instance every 4-8 seconds, with different bed configurations potentially having significantly different duty cycles.
  • Aircraft startup may take several minutes (e.g., 2 to 4 minutes) such that, during the later portion of the OBOGS warm-up period, such as minutes 3 to 4 post startup, the cycling of the PSA beds is stopped such that airs passes over one bed (e.g., bed 112) for a period longer than the typical 1 ⁇ 2 cycle, for instance, 2 to 4 seconds (step 14).
  • the duration of step 14 may be around 5-6 times the length of a bed half cycle, for instance 10 to 30 second.
  • the active sites on the PSA bed e.g., bed 112 receiving the feed air become saturated (such as with N 2 ) such that the molecular sieve material no longer enriches the output gas 104.
  • the above times are merely exemplary and that the half cycle of the beds is typically dependent on the configuration of the PSA and can vary accordingly.
  • the duration of step 14 may vary depending on the accuracy requirement for measurement, the time allowed, as well as the configuration of the bed. As a result of sieve saturation, the 02 concentration within the output gas 104 will drop to near ambient (21%).
  • Sieve saturation and 02 concentrations may be verified by measurement using 02 sensor 108 at step 16. If the measured 02 concentration is not within a tolerance band, such as 21% +/- 3% 02, either the 02 sensor 108 is faulty or the OBOGS 100 and/or PSA system 102 has another operational fault. Aircraft startup may then be stopped for diagnosis and maintenance of the affected systems/components. It should also be noted that the tolerance of the 02 measurement in step 16 may be dependent on the necessary accuracy of the readings for specific applications.
  • step 18 bed cycling is then re-initiated to thereby allow concentration of 02
  • the 02 concentration of the output product gas is measured at regular intervals, such as once every second.
  • the time required to achieve approximately 1 ⁇ 2 the target concentration of the OBOGS is measured at step 22.
  • an OBOGS system has a target, or maximum, 02 concentration of around 93% 02.
  • the percent 02 is measured regularly until the 02 concentration reaches a user defined level, such 50% 02 at step 22.
  • the time measured at step 22 may then be compared to a predetermined, known performance curve for the OBOGS/PSA system (see example below, FIG. 3) stored within controller 116 or an off-board diagnostic unit to determine the condition or 'health' of the PSA sieve beds (step 24).
  • curve 30 may be compared to empirical measurements 32, 34, 36 for the recovery of the 02 concentration of various PSA sieve beds (curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system after 10 liters of 02 production; curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system having 0 liters of 02 production; and curve 34 was generated by a PSA system that has been regenerated to near- new condition).
  • curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system after 10 liters of 02 production
  • curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system having 0 liters of 02 production
  • curve 34 was generated by a PSA system that has been regenerated to near- new condition.
  • modeling curve 30 correlates well with empirical curves 32-36, thereby validating method 10 as a diagnostic test for PBOGS/PSA system performance.
  • method 10 may further include a pass fail measure step 26 for PSA bed health.
  • the %02 may be measured at a predetermined time, such as 20 seconds following initiating of step 18. If the measured %02 is greater than 50%, method 10 may indicate that the PSA system is acceptable and flight operations may be conducted. However, if the measures %02 is below 50% at 20 seconds, another measurement is taken at a second predetermine time, such as 30 seconds after initiation of step 18. If the second %02 measured is greater than 50%, method 10 may indicate that OBOGS 100 /PSA system 102 may be acceptable for flight operations but maintenance will soon be required (see e.g., curve 40). However, should the measured %02 remain below 50%, method 10 may indicate a PSA system 102 failure and that flight operations should be suspended until the OBOGS 100/PSA system 102 is properly maintained or repaired (see e.g., curve 42).
  • method 10 may have the OBOGS/PSA system run to levels higher than 50% of target test point for assessment of bed health.
  • the shape of the recovery curve from 21% to a higher point, such as 70% or 90% may be used to assess the health of the bed.
  • the PSA system is not cycled upon startup of the aircraft systems. Rather, steps 12 and 14 are omitted and method 10 begins at step 12' where air is passed through a single bed (e.g., bed 112) beginning with aircraft systems power up. Not cycling the PSA beds 112, 114 may allow a 21% 02 air stream to be measured at oxygen sensor 108 more quickly. Thus, once 21% 02 is measured at step 16, the remaining steps 18 through 29 of method 10 may proceed unchanged.
  • method 10 may include an additional or alternative step 28 wherein the slope of the oxygen concentration rise is calculated.
  • the maximum rate of change or maximum slope of the increase in %02 may be indicative of the bed health and reduces sensitivity to other time variables within the system.
  • the slope may be calculated over 5 or 10 second periods beginning at step 18. The highest slope during a test period becomes the measurement of health, where the slope is reported as a bed health indication, either in % degradation or simply a slope or other number calculated. The slope reading for each startup is recorded and becomes a history of the trend for the health of the beds. There can also be a minimum slope, where if the beds fall below this slope, a warning is provided to the aircraft.
  • method 10 may report a relative degradation reading after each startup.
  • bed health may be reported as a percent of useful life consumed, or life remaining, in order to improve the predictability of preventative maintenance on bed refurbishment or replacement.
  • outlet flow of the system does have some effect on the readings, it is not required to control the outlet or 'product' flow during method 10. Nevertheless, control of the product flow can be included to provide a higher degree of accuracy of the measurement of bed health. Also, for very high outlet flow rates which significantly reduce the capability of the system to concentrate oxygen to a high level, such as an open flow through a mask, additional steps may be required to restrict that outlet flow during bed health testing method 10. Still further, it is not required, but may be desirable, to control which bed within the system is exposed to a longer flow of ambient air for the first portion of method 10. This may prevent one bed from degrading more quickly than another in conditions where there is a high amount of contamination, such as moisture in the air supply stream. Method 10 may also include a calibration step 29 where the outlet pressure to inlet pressure ratio may be used to adjust the pass/fail threshold values. Temperature correction may also be used in this calibration.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Pulmonology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Anesthesiology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Separation Of Gases By Adsorption (AREA)

Abstract

A system for monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system includes an oxygen sensor coupled to an outlet of the PSA system. The oxygen sensor measures an oxygen concentration of an output air produced by the molecular sieve bed. A controller is in communication with the oxygen sensor and records a series of oxygen concentrations over time. The controller is configured to determine bed health based upon the series of recorded oxygen concentrations.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING PSA BED HEALTH
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
62/484,205 filed April 11, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention generally relates to pressure swing adsorption systems, and more particularly to a system and method of monitoring the health of the molecular sieve beds used within a pressure swing adsorption system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Current Pressure Swing Absorption ("PSA") systems generally utilize molecular sieve material, such as zeolite, to separate incoming air from an air source, such as engine bleed air of an aircraft, by adsorbing nitrogen from the bleed air while allowing oxygen to pass therethrough. The separated oxygen may then be ultimately directed to specific areas (e.g., cockpit, cabin) and personnel (e.g., pilot, crew, passengers) aboard the aircraft so as to provide a breathable gas. The adsorbed nitrogen may be periodically purged from the zeolite under reduced pressure (e.g., at ambient pressure) by using pressure swing techniques in a known manner. The purged nitrogen is then either dumped overboard or used for other purposes, such as inerting the fuel tank ullage of the aircraft.
[0004] However, the material used in the molecular sieve beds degrades over time, especially when exposed to moisture or contaminants in the supply air. One problem encountered in the art is determining how much the sieve has degraded so as to allow proper and timely maintenance actions to recharge or replace a bed unit. This problem is especially true in regard to aircraft On Board Oxygen Systems ("OBOGS"). For OBOGS systems, it has been necessary to provide a known demand on the PSA oxygen concentrator, then measure the oxygen concentration produced and compare it to desired oxygen concentration levels. This approach, however, leads to several problems. For instance, it is difficult to do this on the aircraft without special actions such as valves controlling output flow rate and controlled inlet pressure conditions. These additional activities do not fit well with routine maintenance monitoring and add cost and complexity to operation of the aircraft. They also do not provide the necessary timely information about the health of the sieve material for each flight.
[0005] Thus, what is needed is a system and method for monitoring the health of the molecular sieve beds within a PSA system which does not require special actions or cumbersome flow control protocols.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] In view of the above and in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the present invention is generally directed to a system for monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system includes an oxygen sensor coupled to an outlet of the PSA system. The oxygen sensor measures an oxygen concentration of an output air produced by the molecular sieve bed. A controller is in communication with the oxygen sensor and records a series of oxygen concentrations over time. The controller is configured to determine bed health based upon the series of recorded oxygen concentrations.
[0007] In a further aspect of the invention, a method of monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system of an on-board oxygen generating system (OBOGS) includes a) powering the OBOGS; b) passing feed air into a first molecular sieve bed of the PSA system to produce an output gas; c) measuring an oxygen concentration of the output gas; d) cycling the PSA system to produce an oxygen-enriched output gas; e) measure the oxygen concentration of the oxygen-enriched output gas at regular time intervals until the oxygen concentration reaches a predetermined level; f) determining a length of time for the PSA system to reach the predetermined oxygen concentration; g) compare the length of time against a performance curve; and h) determine the bed health as a function of step g).
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] The invention will further be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings:
[0009] FIG. 1 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for monitoring the health of a molecular sieve bed within a PSA system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; [0010] FIG. 2 is a schematic of an exemplary system for monitoring the health of a molecular sieve bed within a PSA system in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;
[0011] FIG. 3 is a plot of a series of PSA molecular sieve bed units showing percent oxygen concentration as a function of time.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0012] With reference to FIG. 1, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a method 10 for monitoring the health of a Pressure Swing Absorption (PSA) bed generally utilizes the inherent recovery time of the PSA bed to concentrate the desired gas to measure the health or amount of degradation that has occurred within the bed. When used with aircraft, and more particularly military aircraft, method 10 may be implemented during the initial power up sequence of the PSA system prior to each flight operation. It should be noted that method 10 may also be implemented at other times, such as during routine maintenance, to decrease the test time and complexity of bed health testing. However, employment of method 10 during power up of the aircraft is especially important to aircraft operations since it provides an assessment of the PSA performance prior to any flight operations. Continuing the aircraft example and as shown in FIG. 2, an On Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) 100 with a PSA system 102 is configured to generate an output gas 104 having a high concentration of oxygen gas for ultimate delivery to pilots and crew 106, particularly when the aircraft is at high altitude. During the Power up Built in Test (PBIT) of the aircraft, the OBOGS 100 may go through a warm-up period as part of aircraft startup and checkout prior to any flight. As a result, method 10 may be employed during the PBIT or other initiation sequence and may provide a reading of the health of the PSA bed unit while the aircraft is on the ground. Proper decisions can then be made regarding risk of a fault of the OBOGS 100 and/or PSA system 102 during the flight or mission of the aircraft.
[0013] Exemplary method 10 may be used with an OBOGS 100 to monitor (such as via oxygen sensor 108) the oxygen concentration of output gas 104 exiting OBOGS outlet 110 in real time while the operating conditions of the PSA are varied. It should be noted that the following discussion will be directed to a PSA system employing two beds 112, 114. In this instance, one bed is typically under pressure to produce the desired product gas (oxygen, 02) while the other bed is undergoing desorption of adsorbed gas (i.e., nitrogen, N2) at lower (i.e. ambient) pressure. However, one skilled in the art should recognize that method 10 may be used for a 3 or more bed system with appropriate adaptions to account for the additional beds. It should be further noted that, for aircraft applications, it is important that method 10 be inhibited when the aircraft the crew is reliant on the oxygen concentration for breathing, such as when at altitude. Thus, method 10 may be disabled when the aircraft is not on the ground.
[0014] As shown in FIG. 1, method 10 may initiate upon aircraft startup (step 12) with controller 116 instructing OBOGS 100 to cycle the two-beds 112, 114 of PSA unit 102 at its typical duty cycle, for instance every 4-8 seconds, with different bed configurations potentially having significantly different duty cycles. Aircraft startup may take several minutes (e.g., 2 to 4 minutes) such that, during the later portion of the OBOGS warm-up period, such as minutes 3 to 4 post startup, the cycling of the PSA beds is stopped such that airs passes over one bed (e.g., bed 112) for a period longer than the typical ½ cycle, for instance, 2 to 4 seconds (step 14). The duration of step 14 may be around 5-6 times the length of a bed half cycle, for instance 10 to 30 second. During step 14, the active sites on the PSA bed (e.g., bed 112) receiving the feed air become saturated (such as with N2) such that the molecular sieve material no longer enriches the output gas 104. It should be noted that the above times are merely exemplary and that the half cycle of the beds is typically dependent on the configuration of the PSA and can vary accordingly. Additionally, the duration of step 14 may vary depending on the accuracy requirement for measurement, the time allowed, as well as the configuration of the bed. As a result of sieve saturation, the 02 concentration within the output gas 104 will drop to near ambient (21%). Sieve saturation and 02 concentrations may be verified by measurement using 02 sensor 108 at step 16. If the measured 02 concentration is not within a tolerance band, such as 21% +/- 3% 02, either the 02 sensor 108 is faulty or the OBOGS 100 and/or PSA system 102 has another operational fault. Aircraft startup may then be stopped for diagnosis and maintenance of the affected systems/components. It should also be noted that the tolerance of the 02 measurement in step 16 may be dependent on the necessary accuracy of the readings for specific applications.
[0015] At step 18, bed cycling is then re-initiated to thereby allow concentration of 02
(removal of N2 through adsorption to the molecular sieve material) to start as normal. At step 20, the 02 concentration of the output product gas is measured at regular intervals, such as once every second. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the time required to achieve approximately ½ the target concentration of the OBOGS is measured at step 22. Continuing the aircraft example, an OBOGS system has a target, or maximum, 02 concentration of around 93% 02. Thus, at step 20 the percent 02 is measured regularly until the 02 concentration reaches a user defined level, such 50% 02 at step 22. The time measured at step 22 may then be compared to a predetermined, known performance curve for the OBOGS/PSA system (see example below, FIG. 3) stored within controller 116 or an off-board diagnostic unit to determine the condition or 'health' of the PSA sieve beds (step 24).
[0016] As shown in FIG.3, computer modeling has been used to verify the curve shape for recovery of the 02 concentration of a PSA sieve bed, see curve 30. As can be seen in FIG. 3, modeling curve 30 may be compared to empirical measurements 32, 34, 36 for the recovery of the 02 concentration of various PSA sieve beds (curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system after 10 liters of 02 production; curve 32 was generated by a new PSA system having 0 liters of 02 production; and curve 34 was generated by a PSA system that has been regenerated to near- new condition). As a result, modeling curve 30 correlates well with empirical curves 32-36, thereby validating method 10 as a diagnostic test for PBOGS/PSA system performance.
[0017] With continued reference to FIG. 3, it can be seen that as the PSA sieve material degrades, the shape of the recovery curve changes. By way of example, as can be seen by curve 38, a bed system degraded to the point where it still produces enriched oxygen concentration, but at a concentration approximately 70% as opposed to a new system producing 93%, the time to reach 50% concentration is approximately twice as long as a new unit (compare point 50 on curve 32 at approximately 9 seconds to point 52 on curve 38 at approximately 18 seconds). Accordingly, measuring the time it requires a saturated PSA sieve bed to generate 50% 02 may be used to assess bed health in less than one minute.
[0018] With continued reference to FIG. 3, method 10 may further include a pass fail measure step 26 for PSA bed health. In one aspect of the present invention, at step 26 the %02 may be measured at a predetermined time, such as 20 seconds following initiating of step 18. If the measured %02 is greater than 50%, method 10 may indicate that the PSA system is acceptable and flight operations may be conducted. However, if the measures %02 is below 50% at 20 seconds, another measurement is taken at a second predetermine time, such as 30 seconds after initiation of step 18. If the second %02 measured is greater than 50%, method 10 may indicate that OBOGS 100 /PSA system 102 may be acceptable for flight operations but maintenance will soon be required (see e.g., curve 40). However, should the measured %02 remain below 50%, method 10 may indicate a PSA system 102 failure and that flight operations should be suspended until the OBOGS 100/PSA system 102 is properly maintained or repaired (see e.g., curve 42).
[0019] It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the above times and concentrations are exemplary and non-limiting. That is, method 10 may have the OBOGS/PSA system run to levels higher than 50% of target test point for assessment of bed health. Alternatively, the shape of the recovery curve from 21% to a higher point, such as 70% or 90% may be used to assess the health of the bed.
[0020] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the PSA system is not cycled upon startup of the aircraft systems. Rather, steps 12 and 14 are omitted and method 10 begins at step 12' where air is passed through a single bed (e.g., bed 112) beginning with aircraft systems power up. Not cycling the PSA beds 112, 114 may allow a 21% 02 air stream to be measured at oxygen sensor 108 more quickly. Thus, once 21% 02 is measured at step 16, the remaining steps 18 through 29 of method 10 may proceed unchanged.
[0021] In still another aspect of the present invention, method 10 may include an additional or alternative step 28 wherein the slope of the oxygen concentration rise is calculated. By way of example, the maximum rate of change or maximum slope of the increase in %02 may be indicative of the bed health and reduces sensitivity to other time variables within the system. For instance, and without limitation thereto, the slope may be calculated over 5 or 10 second periods beginning at step 18. The highest slope during a test period becomes the measurement of health, where the slope is reported as a bed health indication, either in % degradation or simply a slope or other number calculated. The slope reading for each startup is recorded and becomes a history of the trend for the health of the beds. There can also be a minimum slope, where if the beds fall below this slope, a warning is provided to the aircraft.
[0022] Thus, method 10 may report a relative degradation reading after each startup. For example, bed health may be reported as a percent of useful life consumed, or life remaining, in order to improve the predictability of preventative maintenance on bed refurbishment or replacement.
[0023] It should be noted that while outlet flow of the system does have some effect on the readings, it is not required to control the outlet or 'product' flow during method 10. Nevertheless, control of the product flow can be included to provide a higher degree of accuracy of the measurement of bed health. Also, for very high outlet flow rates which significantly reduce the capability of the system to concentrate oxygen to a high level, such as an open flow through a mask, additional steps may be required to restrict that outlet flow during bed health testing method 10. Still further, it is not required, but may be desirable, to control which bed within the system is exposed to a longer flow of ambient air for the first portion of method 10. This may prevent one bed from degrading more quickly than another in conditions where there is a high amount of contamination, such as moisture in the air supply stream. Method 10 may also include a calibration step 29 where the outlet pressure to inlet pressure ratio may be used to adjust the pass/fail threshold values. Temperature correction may also be used in this calibration.
[0001] Although the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it is understood that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the full spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims which follow.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A system for monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system, the system comprising:
a) an oxygen sensor coupled to an outlet of the PSA system, wherein the oxygen sensor measures an oxygen concentration of an output air produced by the molecular sieve bed;
b) a controller in communication with the oxygen sensor, the controller configured to record a series of oxygen concentration measurements over time, wherein the controller is configured to determine bed health based upon the series of recorded oxygen concentrations.
2. The system in accordance with claim 1 wherein successive oxygen concentration measurements within the series of oxygen concentration measurements are taken at regular time intervals.
3. The system in accordance with claim 2 wherein the bed health is determined by calculating, using the controller, a length of time for the output gas to reach a predetermined oxygen concentration.
4. The system in accordance with claim 2 wherein the regular time interval is one second.
5. A method of monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system of an on-board oxygen generating system (OBOGS), the method comprising:
a) powering the OBOGS;
b) passing feed air into a first molecular sieve bed of the PSA system to produce an
output gas;
c) measuring an oxygen concentration of the output gas; d) cycling the PSA system to produce an oxygen-enriched output gas;
e) measuring the oxygen concentration of the oxygen-enriched output gas at regular time intervals until the oxygen concentration reaches a predetermined level;
f) determining a length of time for the output gas to reach the predetermined oxygen
concentration;
g) comparing the length of time against a performance curve; and
h) determining the bed health of the first molecular sieve bed as a function of step g).
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
i) communicating the determined bed health, wherein the communication comprises one of:
i) the first molecular sieve bed is fully operational; or
ii) the first molecular sieve bed is operational but will require maintenance; or iii) the first molecular sieve bed is non-operational and requires immediate
maintenance.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the communication further includes an anticipated period of time until maintenance will be required.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the communication further includes a
measurement of a length of time since the last maintenance of the first molecular sieve bed.
9. A method of monitoring the bed health of a molecular sieve bed within a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system of an on-board oxygen generating system (OBOGS), the method comprising:
a) powering the OBOGS;
b) passing feed air into the OBOGS;
c) cycling the feed air between a first molecular sieve bed and a second molecular sieve bed, wherein one of the first or second molecular sieve beds is receiving the feed air at high pressure while the other of the first or second molecular sieve beds is at ambient pressure; d) stopping the cycling of the feed air,
e) passing feed air into the first molecular sieve bed of the PSA system until an output gas has an ambient oxygen concentration equal to the oxygen concentration of ambient air;
f) confirming the ambient oxygen concentration of the output gas;
g) restarting cycling of the feed air between the first molecular sieve bed and the second molecular sieve bed to produce an oxygen-enriched output gas having an enriched oxygen concentration;
h) measuring the enriched oxygen concentration of the oxygen-enriched output gas at regular time intervals until the enriched oxygen concentration reaches a predetermined level;
i) determining a length of time for the output gas to reach the predetermined oxygen concentration;
j) comparing the length of time against a performance curve; and
k) determining the bed health of the first molecular sieve bed as a function of step j).
PCT/US2018/027122 2017-04-11 2018-04-11 System and method for monitoring psa bed health Ceased WO2018191385A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762484205P 2017-04-11 2017-04-11
US62/484,205 2017-04-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018191385A1 true WO2018191385A1 (en) 2018-10-18

Family

ID=63710163

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2018/027122 Ceased WO2018191385A1 (en) 2017-04-11 2018-04-11 System and method for monitoring psa bed health

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US10702722B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2018191385A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4107072A4 (en) * 2020-02-18 2024-04-03 Cobham Mission Systems Davenport LSS Inc. Obogs composition control and health monitoring

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3880344B1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2022-07-06 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Portable oxygen concentration
US11577101B2 (en) * 2019-09-24 2023-02-14 Mission Systems Davenport Inc. Composition control for OBOGS
JP7645570B2 (en) 2020-07-16 2025-03-14 ベンテック ライフ システムズ, インコーポレイテッド Systems and methods for concentrating gases - Patents.com
CA3189540A1 (en) 2020-07-16 2022-01-20 Invacare Corporation System and method for concentrating gas

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6669758B1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2003-12-30 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Variable inlet air restriction for composition control of product gas
WO2004096111A2 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-11 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentration system having selectable beds
US20060062707A1 (en) * 2004-09-21 2006-03-23 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen generator with storage and conservation modes
EP0860646B1 (en) * 1997-02-10 2007-08-29 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentrator
US20150196245A1 (en) * 2014-01-10 2015-07-16 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Reduced cognitive function detection and alleviation system for a pilot

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0250235A1 (en) 1986-06-17 1987-12-23 Negretti Aviation Limited Improvements in and relating to pressure swing oxygen generating systems
GB8907447D0 (en) 1989-04-03 1989-05-17 Normalair Garrett Ltd Molecular sieve-type gas separation systems
US5071453A (en) 1989-09-28 1991-12-10 Litton Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentrator with pressure booster and oxygen concentration monitoring
EP0760247A3 (en) 1995-08-30 1997-04-23 Devilbiss Health Care Inc Oxygen concentrator monitoring system
US5858063A (en) 1997-06-03 1999-01-12 Litton Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentrator with beds' duty cycle control and self-test
GB9715747D0 (en) * 1997-07-26 1997-10-01 Normalair Garrett Ltd Method of testing
KR19990028153A (en) * 1997-09-30 1999-04-15 정휘동 Portable PS Oxygen Generator
JP4473580B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2010-06-02 エアーセップ・コーポレーション Portable oxygen concentrator
GB0303936D0 (en) 2003-02-21 2003-03-26 Honeywell Normalair Garrett Method of testing
US6889144B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2005-05-03 Praxair Technology, Inc. Life prediction for gas purifiers
FR2880328B1 (en) 2005-01-06 2008-08-22 L'air Liquide METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VERIFYING THE CORRECT OPERATION OF AN ONBOARD OXYGEN PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT FOR AN AIRCRAFT
CA2706523A1 (en) 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Airbus Operations Gmbh Test equipment and method for testing an aircraft oxygen system control device
US9089721B1 (en) * 2012-03-22 2015-07-28 The Boeing Company Oxygen generating system
US9925497B2 (en) 2015-07-13 2018-03-27 Hamilton Sunstrand Corporation Condition monitoring for an air separation module

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0860646B1 (en) * 1997-02-10 2007-08-29 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentrator
US6669758B1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2003-12-30 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Variable inlet air restriction for composition control of product gas
WO2004096111A2 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-11 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen concentration system having selectable beds
US20060062707A1 (en) * 2004-09-21 2006-03-23 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen generator with storage and conservation modes
US20150196245A1 (en) * 2014-01-10 2015-07-16 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Reduced cognitive function detection and alleviation system for a pilot

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4107072A4 (en) * 2020-02-18 2024-04-03 Cobham Mission Systems Davenport LSS Inc. Obogs composition control and health monitoring
US12115394B2 (en) 2020-02-18 2024-10-15 Cobham Mission Systems Davenport Lss Inc. OBOGS composition control and health monitoring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20180289992A1 (en) 2018-10-11
US10702722B2 (en) 2020-07-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10702722B2 (en) System and method for monitoring PSA bed health
US5858063A (en) Oxygen concentrator with beds' duty cycle control and self-test
EP3118121B1 (en) Condition monitoring for an air separation module
US8171932B2 (en) Oxygen breathing device for an aircraft
KR102186988B1 (en) On-board inert gas generation system predictive health monitoring
CA2936507C (en) Reduced cognitive function detection and alleviation system for a pilot
US9002616B2 (en) Full authority digital engine control system for aircraft engine
CN107635874A (en) Aircraft air quality monitoring system and method
US12115394B2 (en) OBOGS composition control and health monitoring
JP4138030B2 (en) Test method for aircraft oxygen supply system
EP2143636B1 (en) Oxygen breathing device for an aircraft
US11932404B2 (en) OBOGS controller
EP3960275A1 (en) Obogs controller
US20230032906A1 (en) Apparatus for supplying oxygen to a vehicle user, and vehicle comprising such an apparatus
US20190369074A1 (en) Device for Measuring the Amount of Oxygen Present in a Gas, and Air-Separation Module Comprising Such a Measurement Device
CN103476461B (en) The method of protection aircraft occupant and respiratory mask

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18783884

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18783884

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1