[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2016021522A1 - Dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs et procédé de recherche - Google Patents

Dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs et procédé de recherche Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016021522A1
WO2016021522A1 PCT/JP2015/071901 JP2015071901W WO2016021522A1 WO 2016021522 A1 WO2016021522 A1 WO 2016021522A1 JP 2015071901 W JP2015071901 W JP 2015071901W WO 2016021522 A1 WO2016021522 A1 WO 2016021522A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
supplier
company
buyer
search
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2015/071901
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
哲朗 足立
田口　謙太郎
英紀 木内
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Publication of WO2016021522A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016021522A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a supplier search apparatus and a search method for searching for a supplier that can supply parts and the like.
  • Patent Document 1 shows the attributes of each company and the contents of transactions between companies on a map that represents the business relationships between many companies in a tree shape for the purpose of seeing the extent of the impact of bankruptcy of a company. The technology that makes it possible to grasp the situation is also disclosed.
  • Patent Document 1 can be used as clue information when searching for suppliers who procure parts such as standard products or catalogs because they know the business relationship between companies and the industry of the companies.
  • the disclosed supplier search device searches a company information DB in which company information is stored in accordance with a search condition input from the input / output device, refers to the searched company information, and indicates a business relationship between the supplier and the buyer.
  • a supplier candidate selection unit that creates a business relationship information table
  • a competitiveness processing unit that obtains a competition level indicating the distance of a competitive relationship between a buyer and a company included in the business relationship information table
  • an input / output device A search result output unit is provided for outputting, to the input / output device, a supplier candidate list indicating a business relationship with a buyer corresponding to a competition degree that satisfies the inputted competition degree condition.
  • composition of a supplier search device It is an example of a search condition input screen. It is an example of a search condition table. It is a processing flowchart of a supplier candidate selection part. It is a processing flowchart of a supplier candidate selection part. It is an example of a company information list. It is an example of a company master table. It is a figure which shows the example of a company catalog. It is a figure which shows the example of a company homepage. It is a process flowchart of a competition degree process part. It is an example of a business relationship information table. It is a process flowchart of a search result output part. It is an example of a business relation output field. It is an example of a score calculation information table.
  • the supplier search device will be described as a case where a company is a manufacturer of products and searches for suppliers who are suppliers of parts necessary for product manufacture.
  • companies not only so-called parts, but for example, design companies that provide product designs, technical advisor companies that provide special technologies, adhesives with the required adhesive strength, and paints with the required color and gloss Companies that provide tangible and intangible technologies and services, such as chemical material companies that provide products and companies that relate to the transportation and distribution of products, are also required as suppliers or partners. Therefore, here, the parts are not limited to tangible parts but include intangible services and technologies, and suppliers include not only parts suppliers but also companies that provide intangible services and technologies.
  • the supplier search device to be described is a device that assists a company in making a decision to finally determine a supplier with reference to a search result.
  • FIG. 1 is a configuration example of the supplier search device 1.
  • the supplier search apparatus 1 includes a search condition input unit 10, a supplier candidate selection unit 20, a competition degree processing unit 30, a supplier rank processing unit 40, a search result output unit 50, a search condition table 60, and company information.
  • the computer includes a list 70, a company master table 80, and a business relationship information table 90 in a storage device, and is connected to the input / output device 110 and to the company information DB 100 via a network. Temporary data associated with the execution of each processing unit is appropriately stored in the storage device of the supplier search device 1 and referenced.
  • the search condition input unit 10 stores the supplier search conditions input from the input / output device 110 in the search condition table 60.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 searches the company information DB 100 according to the search conditions of the search condition table 60 and stores the search result in the company information list 70.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 creates a company master table 80 and a business relationship information table 90 based on the company information list 70.
  • the competition degree processing unit 30 obtains a supplier candidate from the relationship (competition degree) with a competitor competing in the product or market for the company, and stores it in the company master table 80.
  • the supplier ranking processing unit 40 evaluates scores of suppliers and ranks them.
  • the supplier search apparatus 1 functions as an apparatus that supports decision making for determining a supplier.
  • the company information DB 100 may be an in-company database (internal database) in which company information provided by each company is collected in advance, or may be a website (external database) of each company that can be accessed via a search site on the Internet. They may be used in combination. Here, it is sufficient that it is at least a target of search, and what kind of database is not essential, so details are omitted, but it is desirable to use it together.
  • the internal database stores business information that has been in business relations up to now, and often contains information (technical know-how, prices, etc.) that, if leaked to the outside, can cause problems with the credit of the transaction.
  • Companies that have a business relationship are generally limited to suppliers whose buyers are their own companies. Therefore, in order to search for new suppliers, it is necessary to use them together with an external database.
  • Most internal databases store company information according to a predetermined format and are managed by a database management system.
  • the external database is likely to be insufficient in terms of the amount of information and the specifics of the information content as individual company information for searching for suppliers. Is important to get. In particular, it is important to search for suppliers of parts that cannot be procured from companies that have a business relationship to date.
  • external databases such as websites publicize their parts and technologies for PR and sales promotion of each company's technical capabilities, they actively disclose delivery results to major customers (buyers). It is rare to disclose suppliers (suppliers) of parts (parts here are metal materials in the case of a metal processing company, for example).
  • the company information collected in the internal database depends on the transaction content up to the present, and does not include much other information related to the company (for example, parts with no transaction history).
  • the company information DB 100 there is a great advantage of using both an internal database and an external database related to the same company.
  • the supplier search apparatus 1 supports a plurality of access types. There is a need. For this, since many access tools (access processing programs) already exist, the supplier search apparatus 1 may use them selectively.
  • FIG. 2 is an example of a search condition input screen displayed on the input / output device 110 by the search condition input unit 10.
  • the search condition input screen includes an input field for a supplier name 111, a part name 112, a plurality of keywords 113, an upper limit value 114 of the number of supplier companies to be acquired as a search result, and an execution button 115 for starting the supplier candidate selection unit 20. Including.
  • the search condition input unit 10 stores the content input on the search condition input screen in the search condition table 60. Then, the supplier candidate selection unit 20 is activated.
  • the reason why the keyword 113 is a display example starting from “keyword 3” is shown in the description of the search condition table 60 of FIG.
  • FIG. 3 is an example of the search condition table 60.
  • “Keyword 1” is added to the supplier name 61 and “Keyword 2” is assigned to the part name 62.
  • the keyword is the same as the keyword 63 when searching the company information DB 100 described later. It is because it uses as.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 acquires company information including at least one of KW1, KW2,..., KWn from the company information DB 100.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 acquires the company information of the set supplier name 61 from the company information DB 100.
  • the keyword 63 is set, the company information of the part including the set keyword 63, the company name and the business partner (hereinafter referred to as the keyword 63, etc.) from the set company information of the supplier name 61. Is acquired from the company information DB 100. If the company information of the part including the set keyword 63 and the like cannot be classified, the company information is acquired from the company information DB 100 regardless of the set keyword 63.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the company information of the part related to the part name 62 of the set supplier name 61 to the company information DB 100. Get from.
  • the keyword 63 is set, the company information of the part including the set keyword 63 and the like from the company information DB 100 from the company information of the part related to the part name 62 of the set supplier name 61 from the company information DB 100. get.
  • the company information DB 100 stores the part of the company information related to the part name 62 of the company information of the supplier name 61 regardless of the set keyword 63. Get from.
  • the company information of the part related to the set part name 62 cannot be classified, the company information of the set supplier name 61 regardless of the setting of the keyword 63 regardless of the set part name 62. Is acquired from the company information DB 100.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 acquires company information including the part name 62 from the company information DB 100. At this time, the acquisition of the part related to the part information 62 and the part of the company information including the set keyword 63 is the same as in the case of (3).
  • the upper limit 64 of the number of supplier companies to be acquired is significant in the cases (1) and (4) above, that is, the supplier name 61 is not set.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 may acquire company information of several tens to several hundred companies from the company information DB 100, and the supplier search apparatus 1 performs evaluation described later from among them.
  • a high company is narrowed down to the upper limit of 64 and used as a supplier search result.
  • Company information of several tens to several hundred companies may be sequentially output as a supplier search result.
  • a large number of users using the supplier search device 1 are required. The role as a decision support device is impaired.
  • a desired part is specified by “aluminum”, “press processing”, “curved surface”, “polishing”, etc. as the keyword 63.
  • the part relating to the part name 62 and the part including the set keyword 63 are classified (selected) in the company information, in the case of an internal database, it can often be classified from a predetermined format. In many cases, it cannot be classified in the database. In many cases of accessing an external database, the company information of a supplier company that meets the search conditions is acquired as a whole. However, if the page including the keyword 63 or the like and the page not including the keyword are clear company information, the page including the keyword 63 or the like may be acquired.
  • FIG. 4A is a processing flowchart of the supplier candidate selection unit 20. Although the outline of the processing of the supplier candidate selection unit 20 activated by the search condition input unit 10 has already been described, it will be briefly described using a processing flowchart.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the supplier name 61 as the keyword 1 (KW1) (S201). If the supplier name 61 is not set (S200), the supplier candidate selection unit 20 proceeds to S210 in FIG. 4B. If the part name 62 is set in the search condition table 60 (S202), the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the part name 62 as the keyword 2 (KW2) (S203). If the part name 62 is not set in the search condition table 60 (S202), the supplier candidate selection unit 20 proceeds to S204.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the keyword 63 set in the search condition table 60 as a search keyword of the company information DB 100 (S204), searches the company information DB 100 (S205), and stores the searched company information in the storage device. Store.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 classifies the company information stored in the storage device by keywords (S205). The classification of corporate information including keywords is as described above.
  • Supplier candidate selection part 20 starts search result output part 50 (S207), and ends processing.
  • the company information stored in the storage device is the company information of the company name set in the supplier name 61 regardless of whether the part name 62 or the keyword 63 is set, the search result output unit 50
  • the company information is output to the input / output device 90. In the processing of the search result output unit 50 to be described later, description of output in this case is omitted.
  • FIG. 4B is a process flowchart of the supplier candidate selection unit 20 following FIG. 4A, and shows a case where the supplier name 61 is not set in the search condition table 60. If the upper limit value 64 is not set in the search condition table 60 (S210), the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets a default value for the upper limit value 64 (S211). The default value is 7 (company), for example.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the number of acquired company information (the number of companies having the company information to be acquired) (S212).
  • the number of acquired company information is, for example, twice the value of the upper limit 64. This is because there is a possibility that the searched order and the order may be changed by the processing of the supplier order processing unit 40. That is, the company information of the number of acquired company information is searched, and the supplier ranking processing unit 40 ranks, selects from the ranked company information a number of company information equal to or less than the upper limit value 64 and acquires it as a search result. Because.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 sets the part name 62 as the keyword 2 (KW2) (S214).
  • the keyword 63 set in the search condition table 60 is set as a search keyword of the company information DB 100 (S215), the company information DB 100 is searched (S216), and the number of acquired company information is obtained in the search order from the searched company information. Is selected and stored in the storage device (S217).
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 classifies the company information stored in the storage device by keywords or the like (S218). The classification of corporate information including keywords is as described above.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 creates a company information list 70 indicating the storage location of the classified company information in the storage device (S219).
  • FIG. 5 is an example of the company information list 70.
  • the company information list 70 includes No 71 indicating the order of the list, the searched supplier (name) 72, the part name 73 when the part name 62 is set in the search condition table 60, and the keyword 63 set in the search condition table 60.
  • Match (represented by a circle in the figure) 74, information source (for example, homepage) 75 of searched company information, storage address 76 of company information stored in the storage device (or classified company information), storage device A storage capacity 77 of the stored company information (or classified company information) and a buyer (name) 78 included in the searched company information are included.
  • the search for the buyer (name) 78 will be described later.
  • the company information list 70 of FIG. 5 is an example in which the search result with the number of acquired company information as 10 (company) is stored in the search order corresponding to the setting of 5 (company) of the upper limit 64 of the search condition table 60. .
  • the search order is from the largest number of matched keywords to the keyword setting order.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 creates a company master table 80 corresponding to the company information list 70 (S220).
  • FIG. 6 is an example of the company master table 80.
  • the company master table 80 includes No 81 indicating the record order of the table, a company (name) 82, a buyer flag 83 indicating that the company is a buyer, a buyer competition 84, and an attribute 85 of the company.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 is a master table that stores information about each company 82 with the supplier 72 and the buyer 78 of the company information list 70 as the company 82. .
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 searches for company information of a new supplier using the buyer 78 of the company information list 70 as a search keyword, and adds the search result to the company information list 70 as a new record.
  • the company master table 80 can be created.
  • the competition level 84 is stored by the competition level processing unit 40 described later.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 activates the competition degree processing unit 40 (S221) and ends the process.
  • the creation of the company information list 70 and the company master table 80 may be performed by a method described later as another processing example of the competition degree processing unit 30.
  • FIG. 7 and 8 are diagrams showing company information stored in the company information DB 100.
  • FIG. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of the company catalog 120.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of the company homepage 130.
  • the company information DB 100 includes, for example, catalog information 120 describing an outline of the company, or homepage information 130 introducing an introduction of the company.
  • the company information includes at least company names 121 and 131 of the company, parts / member names 122 and 132 handled by the company, and character string information 123 and 133 representing the company name of the supplier.
  • homepage information it may be a document in a description format for display on a computer.
  • the company information is searched by the supplier candidate selection unit 20, a company information list 70 is created, and stored in the storage area indicated by the storage address 76 of the company information list 70 in the storage device.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 acquires the supplier company name as the buyer name from the company information of each supplier stored in the storage device, and stores it in the buyer 78 of the company information list 70.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 identifies a character string 123 including “customer”, and follows “A company”, “B1 company”, and “B2” following the character string “customer”. Acquired as the buyer name.
  • “Company A” is the buyer itself (own company)
  • two companies, “B1 company” and “B2 company” from which the information of the company is removed, are the buyers.
  • FIG. 9 is a process flowchart of the competition degree processing unit 30.
  • the relationship between the supplier “X1 company” and the two buyer companies is “X1 company” and “B1 company”, “X1 company” and “B2 company”.
  • “Company X1” is a supplier of “Company A” and a supplier of “Company B1” and “Company B2”.
  • “Company B1” and “Company B2” are directly competing in the supply chain for parts procurement.
  • a direct competitor a company that has a direct competitive relationship.
  • the competition degree processing unit 30 stores the degree of competition between the direct competitor and the company having the buyer flag 85 of the company master table 80 in the degree of competition 84 of the company master table 80 (S300).
  • “Competitiveness” refers to the distance of a competitive relationship with the company in the procurement supply chain. In other words, direct competitors have a strong competitive relationship for buyers, and other buyers supplied by suppliers of direct competitors become indirect competitive relationships (primary indirect competitors) for the company. In addition, other buyers supplied by the primary indirect competitor supplier are secondary indirect competitors. By repeating such processing, indirect companies with higher orders can be extracted. Starting with this direct competitor, the more the company becomes a primary indirect competitor and an nth indirect competitor, the more sparsely related, the more potential supplier candidates can be extracted. In other words, the direct competitors and the company have a very strong competitive relationship, and the indirect competitors of the order are less competitive with the company. The degree-of-competition processing unit 30 sets the degree of competition as the degree of competition.
  • the competition level processing unit 30 calculates the competition level with the buyer who is an indirect competitor, and stores it in the competition level 84 of the company master table 80 (S301). As described above, the degree of competition is calculated by following the relationship between the supplier company and the buyer company in the company master table 80.
  • the competition degree processing unit 30 creates the transaction relation information table 90 (S302), activates the search result output unit (S303), and ends the process. The creation of the business relationship information table 90 will be described later.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 first searches for some suppliers by keyword search, and based on the initial search results, a predetermined buyer (target buyer) among several buyers and a supplier's business relationship (Repeating the supplier candidate selection unit 20 and the competition degree processing unit 30).
  • the target buyer may be based on the user's selection input via the input / output device 110 of the supplier search device 1.
  • Fig. 8 In order to cultivate more new suppliers, taking Fig. 8 as an example, "Company B", “Company B2,” which is a direct competitor in the procurement supply chain, and indirect Extract suppliers that your competitors are using.
  • the supplier candidate selection unit 20 receives input information for searching for a new supplier. Although illustration is omitted, the supplier candidate selection unit 20 displays the buyer (B1 company, B2 company in the example of FIG. 7) with the buyer flag 83 of the company master table 80 on the input / output device 110, and is directly competitive or indirect. Accepts the choice of which buyer (target buyer) to search for competitors.
  • the competition degree processing unit 30 extracts the buyer (target buyer) from the company information DB 100 using the received buyer name of the target buyer as a search key, and stores it in the storage device. Specifically, the buyer name of the received target buyer is compared with the business partner (here, supplier) in each company information in the company information DB 100, and the company information of the matching supplier is extracted as a search result, and the storage device To store.
  • the business partner here, supplier
  • the competition degree processing unit 30 generates business relationship information by the supplier and the buyer from the company information stored in the storage device, and creates a business relationship information table 90.
  • the company name of the company information stored in the storage device is acquired as the supplier name
  • the supplier company name is acquired as the buyer name. Relationship information paired with them is generated as transaction relationship information and stored in a storage device.
  • the business relationship information table 90 is a correspondence table of the supplier 91, the buyer 92, and the business information source 93 of the supplier 91 as business relationship information based on the company information list 70 and the company master table 80. Since the contents of the business relationship information table 90 are clear from the company information list 70 and the company master table 80, they are not essential, but are provided for easy understanding of the explanation to be described later.
  • FIG. 10 is an example of the transaction relation information table 90.
  • the company information of “Company Y” is extracted and stored as a supplier to the direct competitor “Company B2”.
  • the company information of “Y company”, “C1 company” and “C2 company” were extracted as buyers of supplier “Y company”. That is, the business relationship between “Y company” and “B2 company”, “Y company” and “C1 company”, and “Y company” and “C2 company” are extracted and stored in the storage device. Yes.
  • the supplier “Company Y” is a supplier of “Company B2” and a supplier of “Company C1” and “Company C2”.
  • “Company Y” is not a supplier of “Company A”, but has a direct business relationship with “Company B2”, which is a direct competitor, and “C1” and “C2”, which are the buyers, Represents the indirect competitive relationship
  • the business relationship information table 90 in FIG. 10 indicates that the business relationship between the supplier and the buyer is repeatedly searched, and the company master table 80 corresponding to the company information list 70 is created. May be. According to this processing, the competition degree 84 of the company master table 80 is stored as a processing result.
  • FIG. 11 is a process flowchart of the search result output unit 50.
  • the search result output unit 50 displays an input screen on the input / output device 90 in order to input search result output conditions from the input / output device 110 (S500). This display screen is called a transaction relation output area 600.
  • FIG. 12 shows an example of the business relationship output area 600.
  • the business relationship output area 600 includes a search condition input unit 610, a supplier candidate list display unit 630, and a business relationship MAP display unit 620.
  • the search condition input unit 610 is an area for inputting search condition output conditions.
  • Supplier candidate list display unit 630 is an area for displaying supplier names extracted in accordance with the conditions specified by search condition input unit 610 in a list format.
  • the business relationship MAP display unit 620 is a region for visually displaying business information regarding suppliers extracted according to the conditions specified by the search condition input unit 610.
  • the input information received by the search condition input unit 610 may be an existing supplier input area 611, an information source input area 612 from which transaction relation information is extracted, and an execution button 615. Furthermore, in order to limit the number of suppliers to be displayed, there may be a competition input area 613 and an attribute input area 614.
  • the search result output unit 50 displays a list of companies 82 with the supplier flag 83 of the company master table 80 in the existing supplier input area 611, a homepage of the company information of the supplier input in the existing supplier input area 611, etc.
  • the information sources 75 are displayed in the information source input area 612, and the selection input is accepted.
  • the search result output unit 50 displays the degree of competition 84 of the company master table 80 corresponding to the supplier name accepted in the existing supplier input area 611 in the competition degree input area 613 and accepts the input by selection.
  • the search result output unit 50 displays the attribute 85 of the company master table 80 in the attribute input area 614 and accepts the input by selection.
  • the execution button 615 is an execution button for confirming values input in the existing supplier input area 611, the information source input area 612, the competition degree input area 613, and the attribute input area 614 and proceeding to the next process. In the example of FIG. 12, conditions are set so that a new supplier that replaces the existing supplier “X1 company” is extracted from the information on the company homepage to the degree of competition “2”, that is, the supplier of the primary indirect competitor.
  • the search result output unit 50 receives the search result output condition at the search condition input unit 610 (S501).
  • the search result output unit 50 determines whether or not to rank the suppliers when outputting the supplier candidate list (S502), and if so, executes the supplier rank processing unit 40 (S503). The determination of ranking and the execution of the supplier ranking processing unit 40 will be described later.
  • the search result output unit 50 collates information stored in the company master table 80 or the business relationship information table 90 based on the received input data (output conditions for the search result), and is a supplier candidate in the business relationship output area 600.
  • the supplier candidate list is output to the list display unit 630 (S504).
  • the search result output unit 50 executes the supplier MAP generation processing unit (S505).
  • the execution of the supplier MAP generation processing unit will be described later.
  • the output of the supplier candidate list to the supplier candidate list display unit 630 will be specifically described using the transaction relation information table 90 of FIG.
  • the values input to the existing supplier input area 611 and the information source input area 612 are compared with the supplier name 91 and the information source 93 in the transaction relation information table 90, and duplicates among the buyer names 92 included in the corresponding record. Remove the name and save it in the storage device. Next, the value stored in the storage device and the buyer name 92 are checked again, and the supplier name 91 of the corresponding record is extracted and output to the supplier candidate list display unit 630.
  • the supplier name 91 in the transaction relation information table 90 is searched using the supplier name stored in the supplier candidate list display unit 630 as a search key, the duplicate name of the buyer name 92 of the corresponding record is eliminated, and stored in the storage device. To do.
  • the value stored in the main storage device is again checked against the buyer name 92, and the supplier name 91 of the corresponding record is extracted and output to the supplier candidate list display unit 630.
  • the search result output unit 50 extracts the competition level of the buyer from the company master information table 80, and determines whether or not the value (competition level condition) of the competition level input area 613 of the search condition input unit 610 is satisfied (S505). If not satisfied, the process proceeds to S502.
  • the supplier 91 includes a first record and a second record as records including “X1”. “B1 company” and “B2 company” of the buyer 92 of each of the first record and the second record are stored in the storage device. Since there is no supplier whose trading partner is “B1 company” stored in the storage device, the supplier search for “B1 company” ends.
  • the display order of suppliers displayed on the supplier candidate list display unit 630 is not particularly limited. When a large number of suppliers are extracted, there may be a process for controlling the display order so that the supplier to be selected with priority is displayed at the top. For this purpose, the determination of S502 is executed. This determination follows a predetermined necessity of execution or an instruction from the user via the input / output device 110 of the supplier search device 1.
  • the score shown is calculated and output.
  • a table (not shown in FIG. 1) used by the supplier ranking generation processing unit 40 will be described.
  • FIG. 13 is an example of the score calculation information table 360.
  • the score calculation table 360 stores a supplier name 361, a buyer name 362, a competition degree 363, a business relationship reliability 364, and a score 365.
  • the supplier name 361 is a column in which the supplier name 91 of the business relationship information table 90 extracted according to the search condition of the search condition input unit 610 is stored.
  • the buyer name 362 is a column in which the buyer name 92 of the transaction relation information table 90 extracted according to the input condition of the search condition input unit 610 is stored.
  • the competition level 363 is a column for searching the company name 82 in the company master information table 80 using the value stored in the buyer name 362 as a search key and storing the competition level 84 of the record.
  • the business relationship reliability 364 and the score 365 are columns in which values calculated by the supplier rank generation processing unit 40 are stored.
  • FIG. 14 is an example of the score totaling information table 370.
  • the score totaling information table 370 stores at least a rank 371, a supplier name 372, and a total score 373.
  • the rank 371 is a rank (display order) displayed on the supplier candidate list display unit 630.
  • Supplier name 372 is the name of the supplier displayed on supplier candidate list display unit 630.
  • the total score 373 is a column in which values calculated by the supplier rank generation processing unit 40 are stored. That is, it can be seen that the higher the total score 373, the higher the ranking 371.
  • FIG. 15 is a processing flowchart of the supplier ranking processing unit 40.
  • the supplier ranking generation processing unit 40 counts the number of records based on the combination of the same buyer and supplier from the records in the transaction relationship information table 90, and stores it in the transaction relationship reliability 364 of the score calculation information table 360 (S400).
  • the value stored in the business relationship reliability 364 may be the number of information sources from which the business relationship has been extracted.
  • the supplier ranking generation processing unit 40 quantifies each business relationship from the values stored in the competition degree 363 and the business relationship reliability 364 of the score calculation information table 360, and stores them in the score 365 (S401).
  • the score can be calculated by the following formula because it is a supplier of a buyer who is in a more competitive relationship, and the higher the reliability of the business relationship information, the more important the supplier should be.
  • Score 1 / competition ⁇ transaction relationship reliability
  • the transaction relationship between “Company X1” and “Company B1” is “1” for competition and “2” for transaction relationship.
  • the supplier ranking generation processing unit 40 aggregates the value of the score 365 for each business relationship calculated in S401 for each supplier and stores it in the total score 373 of the score aggregation information table 370 (S402). Taking the record of the supplier name “X2” in the score calculation information table 360 of FIG. 13 as an example, the score 365 of “X2” is “2” in the second record, “2” in the third record, and the sum “ 4 ”is stored in the total score 373 of the score totaling information table 370.
  • the supplier MAP generation processing unit Based on the input data received by the search condition input unit 610, the supplier MAP generation processing unit collates information stored in the transaction relationship information table 90 and generates a transaction relationship MAP (transaction relationship diagram). The data is output to the transaction relation MAP display unit 620 in the output area 600. Specifically, the supplier MAP generation processing unit first draws its own mark on the business relationship MAP display unit 620 and draws the mark of the supplier name input in the existing supplier input area 611. Next, the supplier MAP generation processing unit collates the supplier name 91 and the information source 93 in the business relationship information table 90 with the values input in the existing supplier input area 611 and the information source input area 612, and puts them in the corresponding records.
  • the supplier MAP generation processing unit collates the supplier name 91 and the information source 93 in the business relationship information table 90 with the values input in the existing supplier input area 611 and the information source input area 612, and puts them in the corresponding records.
  • the mark of the buyer name 92 included is drawn on the business relationship MAP display unit 620.
  • the extracted buyer name 92 is also stored in the storage device.
  • the supplier MAP generation processing unit next checks the buyer name 92 again based on the value stored in the storage device, extracts the supplier name 91 of the corresponding record, and draws a mark on the business relationship MAP display unit 620.
  • the supplier MAP generation processing unit searches the supplier name 91 using the extracted supplier name 91 as a search key, extracts the buyer name 92 of the corresponding record, and draws a mark on the business relationship MAP display unit 620.
  • the supplier MAP generation processing unit repeats the above processing and draws the transaction information included in the transaction relationship information table 90 on the transaction relationship MAP display unit 620.
  • the processing of the supplier MAP generation processing unit will be described using the screen example of FIG. 12 and the transaction relation information table 90 of FIG.
  • a mark 6212 indicating the company is drawn on the business relationship MAP display unit 620
  • a mark 6211 of “Company X1” input in the existing supplier input area 611 is drawn, and these two marks are represented by lines indicating the business relationship. tie.
  • the supplier name 91 of the transaction relation information table 90 is searched using the value “X1 company” input in the existing supplier input area 611 as a search key, and the buyer name 92 of the corresponding first record and second record is searched. “B1 company” and “B2 company” are extracted, and the respective marks 6221 and 6222 are drawn.
  • the buyer name 92 is searched using “B1 company” as a search key, but since there is no corresponding record, the same processing is executed for “B2 company”.
  • the mark 6223 of “Company Y” of the supplier name 91 of the third record which is the corresponding record in the transaction relation information table 90, is drawn and connected to the mark 6222 of “B2 company” with a line indicating the transaction relation.
  • the supplier name 91 is searched using “Y company” as a search key, the corresponding fourth record and fifth record are extracted, and the corresponding buyer names 92 “C1 company” and “C2 company” marks 6231 and 6232 is drawn, and the drawn marks 6231 and 6232 are connected by a line indicating a business relationship. The above processing is repeated.
  • FIG. 16 is an example in which the method of outputting to the transaction relationship MAP display unit 620 in the transaction relationship output area 600 is modified.
  • the display condition is limited to a primary supplier with a competition level of 1 and output. According to this output method, it is possible to visually select which supplier is important or should be selected for the extracted supplier.
  • “X1 company” 625 has a deal with all buyers “company” 621, “B1 company” 623, “B2 company” 626, and “B3 company” 627. (In-house, user of supplier search device 1) can be determined.
  • “Y1 company” 624 and “Y2 company” 628 are subject to new pioneer suppliers because they have transactions with competitors other than their own companies.
  • Y2 company 628 only has transactions with “B3 company” 637
  • Y1 company” 624 has transactions with “B1 company” 623 and “B2 company” 626
  • Y1 company” is “Y2 company”.
  • the buyer the company, the user of the supplier search device 1) can determine that the supplier is more important than the company.
  • FIG. 17 is an example in which the method of outputting to the transaction relationship MAP display unit 620 in the transaction relationship output area 600 is modified.
  • the example of FIG. 17 is an example in which the thickness of a line indicating between nodes is changed in accordance with the number of company information documents as a basis for extracting a business relationship. For example, when a business relationship is extracted from a plurality of company information documents, the probability of the information increases. Therefore, it may be expressed as the thickness of the line connecting the nodes according to the value stored in the business relationship reliability 364.
  • a candidate for a new supplier can be presented to the buyer (in-house, user of the supplier search device 1), and the user of the supplier search device 1 can easily find a new supplier.
  • this invention is not limited to the above-mentioned Example, Various modifications are included.
  • the above-described embodiments have been described in detail for easy understanding of the present invention, and are not necessarily limited to those having all the configurations described.
  • a part of the configuration of one embodiment can be replaced with the configuration of another embodiment, and the configuration of another embodiment can be added to the configuration of one embodiment.
  • each of the above-described configurations, functions, processing units, processing means, and the like may be realized by hardware by designing a part or all of them with, for example, an integrated circuit.
  • each of the above-described configurations, functions, and the like may be realized by software by interpreting and executing a program that realizes each function by the processor.
  • Information such as programs, tables, and files for realizing each function can be stored in a recording device such as a memory, a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive), or a recording medium such as an IC card or an SD card DVD.
  • control lines and information lines shows what is considered necessary for explanation of control lines and information lines, and does not necessarily show all control lines and information lines on the product. Actually, it may be considered that almost all the components are connected to each other.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

　Selon la présente invention, afin de faciliter la recherche d'un nouveau fournisseur, un dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs comprend : une unité de sélection de fournisseurs candidats pour rechercher, en fonction d'une condition de recherche saisie à partir d'un dispositif d'entrée/sortie, une base de données d'informations d'entreprise dans laquelle sont stockées des informations d'entreprise, et, en se référant à la recherche d'informations d'entreprise, la création d'une table d'informations de relations commerciales indiquant des relations commerciales entre un fournisseur et un acheteur ; une unité de traitement du degré de concurrence pour trouver le degré de concurrence indiquant une distance en relation compétitive dans une chaîne d'alimentation d'approvisionnement entre des acheteurs inclus dans la table d'informations de relations commerciales et la société ; et une unité de sortie de résultat de recherche pour délivrer, pour le dispositif d'entrée/sortie sous la forme d'une liste de fournisseurs candidats, les fournisseurs pour laquelle des relations commerciales avec l'acheteur correspondant au degré de compétition qui satisfait le degré de condition de compétition saisi depuis le dispositif d'entrée/sortie sont indiqués.
PCT/JP2015/071901 2014-08-06 2015-08-03 Dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs et procédé de recherche Ceased WO2016021522A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014-160266 2014-08-06
JP2014160266A JP2016038658A (ja) 2014-08-06 2014-08-06 サプライヤ探索装置および探索方法

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016021522A1 true WO2016021522A1 (fr) 2016-02-11

Family

ID=55263788

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2015/071901 Ceased WO2016021522A1 (fr) 2014-08-06 2015-08-03 Dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs et procédé de recherche

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2016038658A (fr)
WO (1) WO2016021522A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109740838A (zh) * 2018-11-22 2019-05-10 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于大数据的供应商服务评价方法及相关设备
CN111788591A (zh) * 2018-06-05 2020-10-16 株式会社日立制作所 供应商评价系统和供应商评价方法
EP3852034A1 (fr) 2020-01-16 2021-07-21 Fujitsu Limited Procédé de génération, appareil de traitement d'informations et programme de génération

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017212553A1 (fr) * 2016-06-07 2017-12-14 三菱電機株式会社 Dispositif, procédé et programme de médiation
JP6671649B2 (ja) * 2016-08-03 2020-03-25 株式会社三鋭システム 情報処理装置
DE112018006835T5 (de) 2018-01-11 2020-10-15 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Vorrichtung zur Anomalie-Erkennung einer Sekundärbatterie, Verfahren zur Anomalie-Erkennung und Programm
JP7383456B2 (ja) * 2019-11-12 2023-11-20 ユーソナー株式会社 情報管理システム、識別情報付与モジュール及び情報管理方法
JP2021179646A (ja) * 2020-05-11 2021-11-18 株式会社日立製作所 サプライチェーンの信頼性評価システムおよび信頼性評価方法
JP7437235B2 (ja) * 2020-05-25 2024-02-22 株式会社日立製作所 計画連携装置および計画連携方法
JP7034447B1 (ja) 2021-06-21 2022-03-14 株式会社Fronteo 情報処理システム及び情報処理方法
JP7675628B2 (ja) * 2021-11-25 2025-05-13 株式会社日立製作所 バリューチェーン提供装置、バリューチェーン提供システムおよびバリューチェーン提供方法

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007305157A (ja) * 2007-07-17 2007-11-22 Hitachi Ltd 企業間取引仲介方法
JP2009151760A (ja) * 2007-11-13 2009-07-09 Nec (China) Co Ltd オブジェクト間競合指標計算方法およびシステム
US20130275269A1 (en) * 2012-04-11 2013-10-17 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Searching supplier information based on transaction platform
JP2014048862A (ja) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-17 Hitachi Ltd サプライヤ検索装置およびサプライヤ検索プログラム

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007305157A (ja) * 2007-07-17 2007-11-22 Hitachi Ltd 企業間取引仲介方法
JP2009151760A (ja) * 2007-11-13 2009-07-09 Nec (China) Co Ltd オブジェクト間競合指標計算方法およびシステム
US20130275269A1 (en) * 2012-04-11 2013-10-17 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Searching supplier information based on transaction platform
JP2014048862A (ja) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-17 Hitachi Ltd サプライヤ検索装置およびサプライヤ検索プログラム

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111788591A (zh) * 2018-06-05 2020-10-16 株式会社日立制作所 供应商评价系统和供应商评价方法
CN111788591B (zh) * 2018-06-05 2024-02-13 株式会社日立制作所 供应商评价系统和供应商评价方法
CN109740838A (zh) * 2018-11-22 2019-05-10 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于大数据的供应商服务评价方法及相关设备
CN109740838B (zh) * 2018-11-22 2024-04-09 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于大数据的供应商服务评价方法及相关设备
EP3852034A1 (fr) 2020-01-16 2021-07-21 Fujitsu Limited Procédé de génération, appareil de traitement d'informations et programme de génération

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016038658A (ja) 2016-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2016021522A1 (fr) Dispositif de recherche de fournisseurs et procédé de recherche
US10204121B1 (en) System and method for providing query recommendations based on search activity of a user base
US9275062B2 (en) Computer-implemented system and method for augmenting search queries using glossaries
JP6022056B2 (ja) 検索結果の生成
US10140297B2 (en) Supplementing search results with information of interest
EP3238099B1 (fr) Procédé et interface utilisateur pour présenter un contenu auxiliaire conjointement avec des résultats de recherche d'image
US12204594B2 (en) Method and system for providing alternative result for an online search previously with no result
CN101238461B (zh) 能够访问开放网络内容的付费访问法律研究系统
US20120179709A1 (en) Apparatus, method and program product for searching document
CN104750776A (zh) 使用元数据访问数据库平台中的信息内容
JP2015184723A (ja) 文書作成支援システム
US11514031B2 (en) Product navigator
Pustulka et al. Text mining innovation for business
Hechler et al. Intelligent cataloging and metadata management
US8429149B2 (en) System, method and computer program products for determining O*NET codes from job descriptions
KR102651008B1 (ko) 수출입 전문가 유형 분석 시스템
US7093233B1 (en) Computer-implemented automatic classification of product description information
KR102811817B1 (ko) 제조업체 검색결과 제공 장치 및 방법
CN117764688B (zh) 一种针对商品画像的智能风控方法和系统
JP2006031209A (ja) 全文検索システム、全文検索方法、プログラムおよび記録媒体
JP6787768B2 (ja) 文書管理システム、検索装置及び検索プログラム
JP2024121524A (ja) マイクロサービス設計支援システム、マイクロサービス設計支援方法及びプログラム
JP6925611B2 (ja) 文献検索システム
CN119013671A (zh) 信息处理装置以及信息处理方法
Kotze Growing with indexing and the role of citation databases: ISAP shows the way

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15829669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15829669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1