[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2012043108A1 - Serveur de création de tests, serveur de création de formulaires de résultats, serveur de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, serveur de maintenance de problèmes, programme de création de tests, programme de création de formulaires de résultats, programme de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, et programme de maintenance de problèmes - Google Patents

Serveur de création de tests, serveur de création de formulaires de résultats, serveur de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, serveur de maintenance de problèmes, programme de création de tests, programme de création de formulaires de résultats, programme de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, et programme de maintenance de problèmes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012043108A1
WO2012043108A1 PCT/JP2011/069400 JP2011069400W WO2012043108A1 WO 2012043108 A1 WO2012043108 A1 WO 2012043108A1 JP 2011069400 W JP2011069400 W JP 2011069400W WO 2012043108 A1 WO2012043108 A1 WO 2012043108A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
field
student
code
unit
storing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2011/069400
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
正男 松田
浩司 永久
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TACT CO Ltd
Original Assignee
TACT CO Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TACT CO Ltd filed Critical TACT CO Ltd
Priority to KR1020137009134A priority Critical patent/KR20130048295A/ko
Priority to KR1020147007940A priority patent/KR20140044410A/ko
Priority to KR1020137009135A priority patent/KR20130048296A/ko
Priority to CN201180003808.XA priority patent/CN102549634B/zh
Priority to KR1020137009133A priority patent/KR101756245B1/ko
Publication of WO2012043108A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012043108A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/20—Education
    • G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/20—Education

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a test creation server, a result form creation server, a practice problem collection server, a problem maintenance server, a test creation program, a result form creation program, a practice problem collection creation program, and a problem maintenance program.
  • a test creation server that supports effective review by grasping the proficiency level of each student's learning content that is received by school children (hereinafter abbreviated as “students”) at the cram school, and this test
  • a result form creation server that outputs a result form based on the results of the academic achievement test created by the creation server, and a proficiency level for each learning content of the student himself / herself for use in a cram school and / or self-study based on the result form
  • the present invention relates to a practice problem collection server for creating practice problems optimized for each problem, a problem maintenance server for performing maintenance on the difficulty level of problems used for these servers, and a program for realizing these servers.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2005-242018
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a test creation server, a result form creation server, a practice question collection creation server, a problem maintenance server, a test creation program, a result form creation program, a practice question collection creation program, and a problem maintenance program.
  • the test creation server of the present invention provides: A student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name; A problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit as a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing a name of the small unit A small unit master with A problem table comprising a problem code field, a small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the substance of the problem; A problem difficulty level table including a problem code field and a difficulty field for storing a problem difficulty level which is a difficulty level of the problem; A school master field comprising a school code field for storing a school code for uniquely identifying a school, and a deviation value field for storing a deviation value of the school; Aspiring school information table
  • the degree of difficulty corresponding to each can be changed, the learning content and the difficulty level are again specified from the client, the problem entity of the corresponding record is read from the problem table, a test is created and output to the client And a test creation unit for storing the question code of the question used in the test and the student code in the student assignment / grading history table.
  • Subdivide the learning contents into small units register all the problems in the database, classify them in small units, and assign difficulty levels, and create academic ability assessment tests that clarify student grades in small units be able to.
  • the result form creation server of the present invention provides: A student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name; A problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit as a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing a name of the small unit A small unit master with A problem table comprising a problem code field, a small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the substance of the problem; A problem difficulty level table including a problem code field and a difficulty field for storing a problem difficulty level which is a difficulty level of the problem; A school master field comprising a school code field for storing a school code for uniquely identifying a school, and a deviation value field for storing a deviation value of the school; Desired school information table including a student code field,
  • a student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name;
  • a problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit as a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing a name of the small unit
  • a small unit master with A large unit master comprising a small unit field, a large unit field indicating learning content of the superordinate concept of the small unit and including one or more small units, and a large unit name field for storing the names of the large units
  • a problem table comprising a problem code field, a small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the substance of the problem;
  • a problem difficulty level table including a problem code field and a difficulty field for storing a problem difficulty level which is a difficulty
  • the problem maintenance server of the present invention is: A problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit as a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing a name of the small unit
  • a small unit master with A problem table comprising a problem code field, a small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the substance of the problem
  • Problem difficulty level comprising a problem code field, a difficulty field for storing the problem difficulty level, which is the difficulty level of the problem, and a difficulty level registration date field for storing the difficulty level registration date in which the problem difficulty level is stored in the difficulty level field Table
  • Subdivide the learning content into small units register all questions in the database, classify them in small units, assign difficulty levels, and use the database that records the student's correct / wrong results in advance to calculate the correct answer rate By doing so, the validity of the difficulty assigned to the problem can be objectively secured.
  • the present invention provides a detailed grasp of the proficiency level of each student's learning content and supports effective review, and creates a collection of exercises optimized for the proficiency level of each student's learning content.
  • a creation server, a result form creation server, a practice problem collection server, a problem maintenance server, a test creation program, a result form creation program, a practice problem collection creation program, and a problem maintenance program can be provided.
  • This embodiment discloses a learning cram school system.
  • This cram school system is a web-based client / server system.
  • the learning cram school server that provides the core functions of the cram school system is roughly divided into four functions.
  • One is an academic ability grasp test creation function that creates an academic ability grasp test in order to accurately grasp a student's current achievement and review progress.
  • the other is a result form output function that outputs a “result form” that clarifies the student's current academic ability and review progress based on the results of the achievement assessment test.
  • the other is an exercise that includes reviews and preparations when students are practicing and / or self-learning inside and outside the cram school, optimized for the student's current academic ability based on the result form output by the result form output function.
  • This is a practice question creation function that creates a collection (drill).
  • the difficulty level set for each small unit which is stored in the problem database used for the ability to create academic achievement test creation function, result report output function, and exercise problem collection function, shows the test results of many students. It is a problem difficulty level adjustment function that adjusts to the optimum value based on the above.
  • the learning school system has the following concepts, objects, and functions.
  • Result form that clarifies students' current academic ability and review progress based on the unit system diagram
  • "unit system diagram" exists as the underlying concept of all functions . Then, based on the layout design of the unit system diagram, the difficulty of the problem is set for each small unit and the questions are given to the students. To do.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a cram school system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the learning school system 101 includes a learning school server 102 and a client 103.
  • the clients 103 a and 103 b have the same configuration, and these are collectively referred to as the client 103.
  • the client 103 is provided in a learning cram (not shown) in various places where the franchise is deployed.
  • the room manager operates the client 103 to connect the client 103 to the cram school server 102.
  • the client 103 connects to the learning cram server 102 through the Internet 104 and enjoys various services.
  • the client 103 is a general personal computer, and is installed with a network OS (not shown) such as Windows (registered trademark) and a known web browser (not shown), and is a terminal of the learning cram server 102 which is a web server.
  • a network OS such as Windows (registered trademark) and a known web browser (not shown)
  • a client 103 running a network OS and a web browser includes a display unit 105 that is a display, an operation unit 106 that is a pointing device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and an input / output control unit that connects the display unit 105 and the operation unit 106 to a network. It can be seen that it is configured as 107.
  • the input / output control unit 107 is connected to a printer 108 for printing a scholastic ability grasp test, a result form, and a practice question collection, which will be described later.
  • a printer 108 for printing a scholastic ability grasp test, a result form, and a practice question collection, which will be described later.
  • FIG. 1 two clients 103a and 103b are illustrated as an example. Of course, the client 103 is provided according to the number of learning crams in each place.
  • the learning cram server 102 installed in the office that manages the learning crams in each area includes a network OS (not shown) such as Linux (registered trademark), Apache (http://httpd.apache.org/), etc. Web server program 109, various cgi (Common Gateway Interface), and various databases.
  • the web server program 109 receives a request from the client 103, transmits an html (Hyper Text Markup Language) document file to the client 103 in response to the request from the client 103, or activates cgi corresponding to the request content, and the result Is transmitted to the client 103.
  • html Hyper Text Markup Language
  • a login cgi 110 is a registered user of the learning cram school server 102 and manages user authentication of a manager who operates the client 103. For this purpose, the login cgi 110 exchanges login information with the user master 111.
  • the student basic information cgi 112 provides a user interface for recording and managing basic information such as a student's name and grade in a student basic information database (hereinafter referred to as “student basic information DB”) 113.
  • the test output cgi 114 is a cgi for creating and outputting a scholastic ability grasp test for checking the learning progress for each learning content of the student.
  • the test output cgi 114 includes a student aspiration school database (hereinafter abbreviated as “student aspiration school DB”) 115, a student assignment / scoring history table 116, and a problem database (hereinafter abbreviated as “question DB”) 117.
  • the test output cgi 114 provides the academic achievement grasp test creation function described above. This can be said to constitute an academic achievement test creation server. In combination with the client 103, it can be said that an academic achievement grasp test creation system is configured.
  • the cram school system 101 of the present embodiment outputs two types of tests in the achievement grasp test.
  • the first test which can be called the first test, is a test to measure the students' comprehension ability, and three questions are given for each small unit. Based on the result form obtained as a result of the first test, an exercise problem collection described later is created.
  • the second test which can be called the second test, is a test for checking the understanding level of the review of the small unit, focusing on the small unit that was determined to have insufficient understanding in the first test. , One question for each small unit.
  • the test result cgi 118 registers the results of the achievement grasp test in the student assignment / scoring history table 116, registers the achievement of each small unit of the student determined based on the result of the achievement grasp test in the student achievement history DB 119, and the result Cgi for outputting a form.
  • the test result cgi 118 provides the result form output function described above. These can be said to constitute a result form output server. It can also be said that a result form output system is configured by combining with the client 103.
  • the exercise creation cgi 120 selects a problem suitable for the student from the problems stored in the problem DB 117 based on the result form output from the test result cgi 118, and creates an exercise problem collection optimized for the student's current academic ability.
  • the exercise creation cgi 120 provides the above-mentioned exercise question collection creation function. It can be said that this constitutes a practice problem collection server. In combination with the client 103, it can be said that a practice problem collection system is configured.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 which can be called a problem maintenance unit, is a cgi for correcting the difficulty level of each problem registered in a problem difficulty level table (described later in FIG. 5) included in the problem DB 117.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 accesses the problem DB 117 and the student achievement history DB 119.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 provides the above-described problem difficulty level adjustment function. It can be said that this constitutes a problem difficulty level adjustment server. And it can be said that the problem difficulty level adjustment system is configured by combining with the client 103.
  • the student grade management cgi 122 is a cgi for registering data related to student grades in the student grade history DB 119.
  • the student achievement is calculated based on the result and automatically registered in the student achievement history DB 119. Therefore, the student achievement management cgi 122 , Cgi for registering the contents of the test outside the school cram and the school report book.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the test output cgi 114.
  • the test output cgi 114 includes a desired school setting unit 201, a unit selection unit 202, a unit selection template 203, and a difficulty level setting unit 204.
  • the desired school setting unit 201 displays a predetermined input screen on the display unit 105 of the client 103, and records the student's desired school and the desired department in a student desired school information table to be described later.
  • the unit selection unit 202 causes the display unit 105 of the client 103 to display a unit selection screen for selecting a small unit, which is necessary when creating an achievement grasp test. At this time, the unit selection unit 202 reads the unit selection template 203 in order to create a unit selection screen.
  • the difficulty level setting unit 204 causes the display unit 105 of the client 103 to display a difficulty level setting screen for setting the difficulty level for each small unit, which is necessary when creating the achievement grasp test. Since the unit selection unit 202 and the difficulty level setting unit 204 create a scholastic ability grasp test as a final product, it can be said to be a test creation unit.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the test result cgi118.
  • the test result cgi 118 includes a result registration unit 301, a result form output unit 302, and a result form template 303.
  • the result registration unit 301 displays a predetermined input screen on the display unit 105 of the client 103 and records the correctness / incorrectness of the student achievement test test result in the student assignment / scoring history table 116.
  • the result form output unit 302 reads the correctness / incorrectness of the student achievement test test registered in the student's question / scoring history table 116, creates a result form describing the details of each small unit in detail, and outputs the result form to the client .
  • the result form output unit 302 reads the result form template 303 in order to create the result form. Since the result registration unit 301 and the result form output unit 302 process the results of the achievement grasp test, they can be said to be test result processing units.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the exercise creation cgi 120.
  • the exercise creation cgi 120 includes a desired school setting and screen selection unit 401, a first unit setting unit 402, a second unit setting unit 403, a third unit setting unit 404, and a unit setting template 405.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a configuration of a database and a table included in the learning school server 102 of the present embodiment.
  • the user master 111 includes a classroom code field, a user code field, a user classification field, a login ID field, and a password field.
  • the classroom code field a classroom code for uniquely identifying a learning cram school (unique) is stored.
  • the user code field stores a user code that uniquely distinguishes the room manager (user).
  • the login ID field stores a login ID used by the user when logging in. This login ID is also unique.
  • In the password field a password used when the user logs in is stored.
  • the user code stored in the user code field of the user master 111 is unique.
  • the login cgi 110 reads the user master 111, checks the login ID input by the room manager by operating the client 103 and the password, and determines whether or not access to the learning cram school server 102 is permitted.
  • the student basic information DB 113 includes (A) a student basic information table 501 and (B) a classroom master 502.
  • the student basic information table 501 includes a classroom code field, a student code field, a name field, a school year field, a school entrance date field, and the like.
  • the classroom code field is the same as the classroom code field of the user master 111.
  • In the student code field a student code for uniquely identifying a student is stored.
  • the name field the name of the student is stored.
  • the grade level field stores the grade level of the student.
  • the entry date of the student is stored in the entry date field.
  • the classroom master 502 includes a classroom code field and a classroom name field.
  • the classroom code field is the same as the classroom code field of the user master 111 and the student basic information table 501.
  • the classroom name field stores the name of the classroom.
  • the student code stored in the student code field of the student basic information table 501 is unique.
  • the classroom master 502 is used when each cgi refers to the classroom name from the classroom code.
  • the student basic information cgi 112 additionally records basic information such as the name and grade of a student who newly enters a school in the student basic information DB 113.
  • the student basic information DB 113 provides the student's basic information to each cgi when creating a student achievement test, a result form, or a collection of exercises for the student.
  • the student school DB 115 includes (A) student school information table 503 and (B) school school master 504.
  • the student school information table 503 includes a classroom code field, a student code field, a school code field, a department code field, an input date field, and the like.
  • the classroom code field is the same as the classroom code field of the user master 111, the student basic information table 501 and the classroom master 502.
  • the student code field is the same as the student code field of the student basic information table 501.
  • the school code field stores a school code that uniquely identifies a school.
  • the department code field stores a department code that uniquely identifies a department.
  • the input date field stores the date on which the student's desired school was input.
  • the desired school master 504 includes a school code field, a department code field, a school name field, a department name field, a passing reference point field, a deviation value field, and the like.
  • the school code field and the department code field are the same as the school code field and the department code field of the student aspiration school information table 503, respectively.
  • the school name field stores the name of the school.
  • the department name field stores the name of the department.
  • the acceptance reference point field stores the acceptance reference point of the school or department.
  • the deviation value field the deviation value of the school or department is stored.
  • the combination of the school code stored in the school code field of the desired school master 504 and the department code stored in the department code field is unique.
  • the learning cram school system 101 of the present embodiment positions the ultimate goal that students pass the school of choice. Therefore, it is an indispensable task of the cram school that the head of the room hears the school where the student wants.
  • the desired school setting unit 201 of the test output cgi 114 additionally records information on the desired school heard from the student in the student desired school information table 503 as a process to be executed first for a newly enrolled student.
  • the test output cgi 114 is executed and a new record is additionally recorded in the student school information table 503.
  • the deviation value field of the desired school master is referred to from the school code field and the department code of the student desired school information table 503, and the deviation value is converted into a difficulty level described later to obtain the student's learning target level.
  • the student question / grading history table 116 includes a classroom code field, a student code field, a test type field, a test execution date field, a subject code field, a question code field, a large unit code field, and a small unit code field. And a correct / wrong result field.
  • the classroom code field is the same as the classroom code field of the user master 111, the student basic information table 501, the classroom master 502, and the student desired school information table 503.
  • the student code field is the same as the student code field of the student basic information table 501 and the student desired school information table 503.
  • information indicating the type of achievement achievement test is stored. This is information for identifying the first test and the second test.
  • test execution date field the date on which the student's achievement test is executed is stored.
  • subject code field information for identifying a subject (national language / arithmetic / science / society / English) of the achievement test is stored.
  • the problem code field stores a problem code that uniquely identifies the problem.
  • the large unit code field stores a large unit code that uniquely identifies the large unit.
  • the small unit code field stores a small unit code that uniquely identifies the small unit.
  • correct / incorrect result field a flag indicating whether the answer was correct or incorrect when the student solved the question is stored.
  • the problem unit 117 stores the small unit and the difficulty level. Randomly extract the number of questions that match the difficulty level for the number of questions for the academic achievement test.
  • the subject code, question code, large unit code, and small unit code of the extracted problem are difficult, along with the classroom code, student code, test type of the achievement assessment test, and the date of the test.
  • the degree setting unit 204 additionally records in the student assignment / scoring history table.
  • the question DB 117 includes (A) a question table 505, (B) an answer table 506, (C) a question difficulty level table 507, (D) a large unit master 508, and (E) a small unit master 509.
  • the problem table 505 includes a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, a problem code field, and a problem data field.
  • the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question code field are the same as the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question code field of the student question / grading history table 116.
  • the problem code stored in the problem code field of the problem table 505 is unique.
  • the problem data field stores the substance of the problem, that is, the content of the problem itself. For this reason, depending on the content of the problem, it may be indefinite length text data or image data. In particular, in the case of mathematics, image data is used for handling mathematical expressions. Note that this is not the case when a markup language capable of expressing mathematical expressions is used.
  • the answer table 506 includes a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, a question code field, and an answer data field.
  • the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question code field are the same as the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question code field of the student question / grading history table 116 and the question table 505. It is. Similar to the question table 505, the question code stored in the question code field of the answer table 506 is also unique.
  • the answer data field stores the substance of the answer, that is, the content of the answer of the question itself. For this reason, depending on the content of the answer, it may be indefinite length text data or image data. In particular, in the case of mathematics, image data is used for handling mathematical expressions. Note that this is not the case when a markup language capable of expressing mathematical expressions is used.
  • the problem difficulty level table 507 includes a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, a problem code field, a medium difficulty level field, a medium difficulty level registration date field, and a medium difficulty level field. And a medium difficulty level registration date field, a medium difficulty level registration field, and a medium difficulty level registration date field.
  • the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question code field are the subject code field, the large unit code field, the small unit code field, and the question of the student question / grading history table 116, the question table 505, and the answer table 506, respectively. Same as code field.
  • the difficulty level field stores the difficulty level at the time of first grade junior high school students.
  • the middle difficulty level registration date field the date on which the difficulty level is recorded in the middle difficulty level field is stored.
  • the second difficulty level field the difficulty level at the time of the second grader of the problem is stored.
  • the second difficulty level registration date field the date on which the difficulty level is recorded in the second difficulty level field is stored.
  • the difficulty level field stores the difficulty level at the time of the third year of junior high school.
  • the middle three difficulty level registration date field the date on which the difficulty level is recorded in the middle three difficulty level field is stored. Similar to the question table 505 and the answer table 506, the question code stored in the question code field of the question difficulty table 507 is also unique.
  • the large unit master 508 includes a subject code field, a large unit code field, and a large unit name field.
  • the subject code field and the large unit code field are the same as the subject code field and the large unit code field of the student question / scoring history table 116, the question table 505, the answer table 506, and the question difficulty level table 507.
  • the name of the large unit is stored in the large unit name field.
  • the large unit code stored in the large unit code field of the large unit master 508 is unique.
  • the small unit master 509 includes a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, and a small unit name field.
  • the subject code field, the large unit code field, and the small unit code field are the subject code field, the large unit code field, and the small unit code field of the student question / scoring history table 116, the question table 505, the answer table 506, and the question difficulty level table 507, respectively. Is the same.
  • the small unit name field the name of the small unit is stored.
  • the small unit code stored in the small unit code field of the small unit master 509 is unique.
  • the contents of the question table 505 and the answer table 506 are updated by operations such as sequentially adding new questions in order to provide better questions to students.
  • the problem difficulty level table 507 holds the difficulty level of each problem for each grade. This is due to the fact that there are problems that are used beyond the academic year depending on the students' academic ability. If you are an excellent student, you may be able to solve the problem of the third grader unit for preparations even when you are in the first year of junior high school. In some cases, students solve a unit problem in the first grade of junior high school. In addition, for each grade difficulty level, the date when the difficulty level is registered is also recorded. This is because the scoring result of a student who solved the problem before the registration date of the difficulty level is not preferable as a calculation target of the correct answer rate when estimating the difficulty level. This will be described later with reference to FIG.
  • the student achievement history DB 119 includes (A) a student cram school result history table 510 and (B) a student cram school history record table 511.
  • the student cram school record history table 510 includes a classroom code field, a student code field, a test type field, a test execution date field, a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, and a difficulty field. And a scoring result field and an academic achievement field.
  • classroom code field, student code field, test type field, test execution date field, subject code field, large unit code field, and small unit code field are the classroom code field, student code field, and test type of the student question / grading history table 116 The same as the field, the test execution date field, the subject code field, the large unit code field, and the small unit code field.
  • the difficulty level field stores the difficulty level of the question that is given in the small unit belonging to this record.
  • the scoring result field the scoring result of the question presented in the small unit belonging to this record is stored.
  • the academic achievement field stores the academic achievement of the student in the small unit belonging to this record.
  • the non-student grade record history table 511 includes a classroom code field, a student code field, a test type field, a test execution date field, a subject code field, a large unit code field, a small unit code field, and a difficulty level field. And a scoring result field and an academic achievement field.
  • the student cram school history record table 510 and the student cram school record history table 511 have the same names for all fields, but differ only in the test type field.
  • the test type field of the student cram school record history table 510 stores a test type code indicating the type of the achievement assessment test.
  • the test type field of the student non-school results history table 511 stores names of various tests and mock tests performed outside the school.
  • the learning cram school system 101 of the present embodiment registers all questions to be asked to students in the database. Problems are classified according to the content of learning that exists in the subject. This learning content has a large category and a small category that further subdivides it. Therefore, in the cram school system 101 of the present embodiment, the learning content is largely classified into large units, and the large units are further classified into small units. Details of the concept of the large unit and the small unit will be described later.
  • the student's grade is recorded finely for every small unit in the student grade history DB119. This is to clarify the weak points of the students in detail and to obtain the maximum learning effect with the minimum necessary learning.
  • students' grades have been treated by absolute evaluation, which is score, and relative evaluation, which is deviation value.
  • a five-step evaluation standard is employed in order to match the difficulty level of a problem with the student's grade. And these five grades of performance evaluation criteria are directly related to the difficulty of the problem.
  • the grade is C. Assume that if a student solves three questions on difficulty level C and incorrectly answers one or two questions, the grade is D. If the student solves three questions of difficulty C and answers all questions incorrectly, the grade is E. Then, the level of the desired school is also converted into the difficulty level in the learning cram school system 101, and it is compared whether or not the student has reached the grade necessary for passing the desired school. For example, if the desired school is level B difficulty, students need to reach difficulty level B, so it is necessary to complete exercises for each small unit from the current grade level to grade level B . On the other hand, if the grade level of a certain unit has already reached the difficulty level of the desired school, it is no longer necessary to practice the unit.
  • the difficulty level of the problem, the student's grade, and the difficulty level of the desired school which are employed in the learning school system 101 of the present embodiment, are concepts obtained by dividing the deviation value into five levels. As an example, it differentiates as follows. A: Deviation value 66 or more, B: Deviation value 65 to 58, C: Deviation value 57 to 49, D: Deviation value 48 to 42, E: Deviation value 41 or less
  • FIG. 6 is a time chart showing the flow of operations related to the academic achievement server test creation function, result report output function, and practice question collection creation function of the learning cram school server 102. This time chart shows an operation from the time when a student enters a cram school.
  • ⁇ Student basic information registration> When a student enters a cram school, the director first performs counseling (S601), and acquires basic information such as the student's name, school year, and the school to which he belongs. Then, the room manager inputs the basic information of these students to the cram school system 101 (S602). In other words, the room manager operates the client 103 to register the student's basic information in the learning cram school server 102. At this time, the student basic information cgi 112 registers the student basic information received from the client 103 in the student basic information DB 113 (S603).
  • the counselor obtains information on the school that the student wishes to enter and information on the student's current academic ability through counseling.
  • the manager inputs information on the desired school and information on scholastic ability into the cram school system 101 (S604). That is, the student's desired school information and scholastic ability information are registered in the learning cram school server 102.
  • the desired school setting unit 201 of the test output cgi 114 registers the desired school information of the student received from the client 103 in the student desired school DB 115 (S605), and the student grade management cgi 122 receives the student grade information received from the client 103 as the student grade. Register in the history DB 119 (S606).
  • the room manager performs an operation for outputting a scholastic ability test to the cram school system 101 in order to accurately grasp the ability of each student's learning content (S607).
  • the unit selection unit 202 of the test output cgi 114 creates an html document forming a unit selection screen based on the unit selection template 203 in response to the operation of the client 103, and transmits it to the client 103.
  • a unit selection screen which will be described later with reference to FIG.
  • the room manager operates the operation unit 106 while viewing the unit selection screen displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103, and selects learning content to be used for the achievement grasp test given to the student in units of small units.
  • the difficulty level setting unit 204 of the test output cgi 114 forms an difficulty level setting screen for setting the difficulty level for each selected small unit in response to the operation of the client 103. Is transmitted to the client 103.
  • a difficulty level setting screen which will be described later with reference to FIG.
  • the difficulty level setting unit 204 reads the student's desired school and department from the student's desired school information table 503, and reads the deviation value of the student's desired school and desired department with reference to the desired school master 504. Then, the deviation value is converted into a difficulty level and set as an initial value of the difficulty level.
  • the room manager operates the operation unit 106 while looking at the difficulty level setting screen displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103, and selects the difficulty level of the learning content used for the achievement grasp test given to the student in units of small units.
  • the academic achievement test 630 is created by the difficulty level setting unit 204 and output from the printer 108 of the client 103 (S608).
  • the test type code of the achievement comprehension test 630 the problem code of the problem selected from the problem DB 117 when creating the achievement comprehension test 630, the subject code of the problem
  • the unit code, the small unit code, the student code of the student who receives the achievement test 630, the classroom code, and the test execution date are registered (S609).
  • the test output cgi 114 selects a small unit of a question to be asked in the achievement grasp test 630 by the unit selection unit 202 to create the achievement grasp test 630 after setting the desired school, and makes the difficulty level of the problem difficult.
  • the academic achievement grasp test 630 is selected by the degree setting unit 204.
  • the difficulty level setting unit 204 There is a reason that the difficulty level can be changed for each small unit by the difficulty level setting unit 204 in the achievement test. If there is a large gap in the student's academic ability relative to the degree of difficulty at the desired school, the student can hardly solve the problem even if the difficulty level corresponding to the difficulty level at the desired school is solved. You will not be able to grasp the correct academic ability. Therefore, in such a case, the achievement level test is created by degrading the difficulty level of each small unit to the difficulty level close to the student's academic ability.
  • the student receives the achievement grasp test 630 from the room manager and solves the problem (S610).
  • the room manager receives an answer of the achievement test 630 from the student (S611), and operates the client 103 to match the answers (S612).
  • the result registration unit 301 of the test result cgi 118 performs a narrowed search by the student code and the test execution date from the student question / scoring history table 116, and acquires the problem code of the problem used in the achievement grasp test 630 created for the student. To do.
  • the answer table 506 is searched using the question code, the answer data of the question is read, and displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • the room manager matches the answer displayed on the display unit 105 with the content of the student's answer, and inputs a correct / incorrect answer result for each question.
  • the input answer result is registered in the correct / wrong result field of the student question / scoring history table 116 (S613).
  • the result registration unit 301 calculates the achievement of the student for each small unit based on the result of the achievement comprehension test 630 registered in the student question / scoring history table 116, It records in the student cram school record history table 510 (S614). Specifically, for the difficulty level of each question given in the academic achievement test 630, it corresponds to the difficulty level of the set question, depending on whether the student answered all questions correctly or how many questions were incorrect. Calculate your academic ability. For example, if a student solves three questions of difficulty C and corrects all questions, the grade is C. Assume that if a student solves three questions on difficulty level C and incorrectly answers one or two questions, the grade is D. If the student solves three questions of difficulty C and answers all questions incorrectly, the grade is E. The grades for each small unit of the student thus calculated are additionally recorded in the achievement field of the grade history table 510 in the student cram school.
  • the result form is a document created for printing by the printer 108, and is, for example, a PDF (Portable Document Format) format of Adobe Systems.
  • the result form template 303 is a form for printing.
  • the result form 631 is created by the result form output unit 302 and can be output from the printer 108 of the client 103 (S615).
  • the room manager performs a task of creating a collection of exercises to be given to the students.
  • the cram school system 101 presented the result form 631 that clearly shows the student's detailed academic ability for each small unit by the result form output unit 302 to the room manager and the student, so that the room manager uses the result form 631 for the next four months.
  • the contents of learning can be planned in detail.
  • the room manager operates the client 103 while referring to the result form 631 to create an exercise problem collection (S616).
  • the desired school setting and screen selection unit 401 displays a screen for confirming a student's desired school on the display unit 105 of the client 103, and then displays a screen for selecting three types of exercise question collection creation screens. To display.
  • the manager selects one of the three types of exercise collection screens: “Easy Order Screen”, “Regular Screen”, and “Full Customize Screen”.
  • the first unit setting unit 402 When the manager selects “easy order screen”, the first unit setting unit 402 is activated, and an easy order screen, which will be described later with reference to FIG. 11, is displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • the second unit setting unit 403 When the room manager selects “regular screen”, the second unit setting unit 403 is activated, and an easy order screen described later with reference to FIG. 12 is displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • the first unit setting unit 402 and the second unit setting unit 403 read the unit setting template 405 and create the content (html document) to be displayed on the screen according to the layout described in the unit setting template 405.
  • the third unit setting unit 404 When the room manager selects the “full customization screen”, the third unit setting unit 404 is activated, and an easy order screen described later with reference to FIG. 13 is displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • the third unit setting unit 404 reads the student cram school result history table 510 and the student cram school result history table 511, acquires the latest student grade information, and selects a small unit in advance based on the grade information.
  • the displayed display screen (html document) is created (S617).
  • the manager sets the learning content and the number of questions to be issued as exercises using one of the “Easy Order Screen”, “Regular Screen”, and “Full Customize Screen”. Then, the exercise creation cgi 120 outputs the exercise problem collection 632 (S618).
  • the first unit setting unit 402, the second unit setting unit 403, and the third unit setting unit 404 provide a function for creating the exercise problem collection 632, and thus can be said to be exercise problem collection creation sections.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of the unit system diagram.
  • the unit system diagram 701 becomes huge when it is included from the first grade of elementary school to the third grade of high school, so FIG. 7 shows mathematics of junior high school students as an example.
  • a school year 702 which is a time series of school years / semesters, is arranged on the vertical axis from the bottom to the top, and a large learning content category 703 is arranged on the horizontal axis.
  • the semester semester 702 is divided into the first semester, the second semester, and the third semester respectively from the bottom to the top.
  • the learning content category 703 includes three categories of “calculation”, “function”, and “figure”. Then, learning contents based on the learning guidance guidelines of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and publications issued by educational institutions and examination institutions including applicants are classified as learning contents and arranged at corresponding locations in the unit system diagram 701. Since the course of study does not have a structured description of the learning content, many educational institutions and examination institutions, including applicants, make their own interpretations, classify the learning content, and organize the interrelationships of these learning content. ing. The inventor divided the learning contents into a large unit having a mutual relationship and a small unit for further subdividing the large unit.
  • FIG. 7 shows only a large unit as a large unit label 704 due to space limitations.
  • the unit selection screen shown in FIG. Next the large units related to each other are connected by lines. In this way, when the academic ability of a unit is insufficient, it is possible to determine whether to study only that unit or to review a unit necessary to understand the unit.
  • This unit system diagram 701 is very useful not only for grasping the scholastic ability of each small unit of the student at the present time, but also for making a learning plan such as what can be efficiently understood next time. Therefore, a screen for creating the achievement comprehension test 630 (unit selection screen in FIG. 8), a result form 631 (result form 631 in FIG. 10) showing the result of the achievement comprehension test 630, and an exercise question collection 632 are created. A common layout is adopted for the screens (the easy order screen of FIG. 11 and the regular screen of FIG. 12).
  • the inventor has also realized that students must be given a difficulty level appropriate to the student's academic ability. This is because problems that are too easy or difficult do not contribute to the improvement of academic ability. I also realized that students' academic abilities differ from unit to unit. This means that students have high academic ability related to small units whose contents are understood, but conversely, their academic ability related to small units whose contents are not understood is low. Today, many tests are scored, but this is only the total score of the questions on the test, and the degree of comprehension for each small unit does not appear as data. The inventor has come up with the following concept.
  • FIG. 8 is a partially enlarged view of the unit selection screen created by the unit selection unit 202 of the test output cgi 114.
  • the unit selection screen 801 is created based on the layout of the above-described unit system diagram 701, and FIG. 8 is partially enlarged to show the details.
  • the large unit button 802 is a toggle-type button, and when it is clicked with a mouse or the like, it changes reversibly to either a red indicating a selected state or a gray indicating a non-selected state.
  • a small unit label 803 is unfolded and displayed immediately below the large unit button 802.
  • a check box 804 is provided on the left side of the small unit label 803, and it is possible to select which small unit is to be asked by clicking with a mouse or the like.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a difficulty level selection screen created by the difficulty level setting unit 204 of the test output cgi 114.
  • the selected small units are displayed after being grouped for each large unit, and a difficulty setting pull-down menu 904 is provided for each small unit at the right end of the small unit display field 903.
  • the difficulty level can be freely changed for each small unit.
  • the learning content that is not good is known, it is possible to reduce the difficulty level of the small unit or the large unit corresponding to the learning content, and realize more accurate scholastic ability.
  • FIG. 10 is a partially enlarged view of the result form 631 created by the result form output unit 302 of the test result cgi 118.
  • the large unit label 704 and the small unit label 803 are arranged on the paper in the same layout of the unit system diagram 701 as the unit selection screen 801 described above with reference to FIG.
  • the large unit learning achievement rate column 1001 displays the learning achievement rate as a percentage.
  • a small unit learning achievement rate column 1002 indicating the learning achievement rate of the small unit is provided.
  • the small unit learning achievement rate column 1002 according to the ratio of the number of correct answers to the number of questions given in the small unit, “ ⁇ (circle indicating correct answers for all questions)” “ ⁇ (triangle indicating partially incorrect answers)
  • the learning achievement rate is displayed in three stages, “ ⁇ ” (a cross indicating an incorrect answer for all questions).
  • this “ ⁇ / ⁇ / ⁇ ” is referred to as a three-stage performance mark.
  • two small unit learning achievement rate columns 1002 are provided on the left and right, and the left column displays the results of the previous achievement test 630, and the right column displays the results of the current achievement test 630.
  • the three-stage grade mark is calculated and determined by the result form output unit 302 totaling the correct / wrong result field of the student assignment / scoring history table 116.
  • the result form output unit 302 extracts the student records from the student assignment / scoring history table 116, and then sorts them by the test execution date. Then, a value obtained by tabulating the correct / wrong result field of the record corresponding to the latest test and a value obtained by summing the correct / wrong result field of the record corresponding to the immediately preceding test are converted into print data according to the result form template 303.
  • the printing of the result form 631 by the result form output unit 302 corresponds to so-called merge printing known in a word processor.
  • the small unit learning achievement rate column 1002 a three-level grade mark is printed in red at a location corresponding to the latest test result.
  • the results of tests that are not up-to-date are printed in black with a three-level grade mark.
  • the red three-level grade mark you can determine at a glance which small unit problem this test solved.
  • the large unit learning achievement rate column 1001 it can be determined at a glance for each large unit whether or not the achievement of the target level by review has been achieved.
  • the large unit with the large unit learning achievement rate column 1001 of the result form 631 of “100%” is filled from the bottom to the top.
  • the learning school system 101 of the present embodiment positions the ultimate goal that the student passes the school of interest. For example, if the desired school is level C, all the academic abilities for each small unit that students will take must be level C or higher. However, even if the level of a specific small unit or large unit is raised unnecessarily, it does not make sense if the level of another unit does not reach the target level. Therefore, the determination criterion for achievement is based on the level of the desired school and whether or not the academic ability of each small unit has reached the level of the desired school.
  • the unit that has reached the target level does not learn any more, and develops a learning plan so that it focuses on the level of other units.
  • the learning achievement rate for each small unit on the basis of the difficulty level of the desired school, it is possible to give the student the ability to pass the target desired school with the minimum necessary effort. Being able to acquire the target academic ability with the minimum amount of effort means that students can achieve the target quickly. This can give students great confidence. Then, students will have a more positive feeling toward learning and will be able to raise their target level, that is, aim for a school of higher difficulty.
  • the school cram school system 101 of the present embodiment has the ultimate goal of passing the desired school, so the option of actively eliminating such disadvantageous units is also a measure that can be taken to pass the desired school It is.
  • the problem of the unit with low question frequency is set in the problem difficulty level table 507 so that only a high difficulty level such as A or B is assigned. Then, since a student who desires a high school with a difficulty level of C cannot select it on the unit selection screen 801, it is not necessary to practice such a low-frequency question.
  • the result form 631 remains blank. The decision to determine the study pace distribution necessary for such a pass can also be judged at a glance by looking at the result form 631.
  • FIG. 11 is a partially enlarged view of the easy order screen created by the first unit setting unit 402 of the exercise creation cgi 120.
  • the easy order screen 1101 is created based on the layout of the unit system diagram 701 described above, and FIG. 11 is partially enlarged to show the details.
  • the large unit label 1102 is a toggle-type display label. When a large unit check box 1103 arranged near the large unit label 1102 is clicked with a mouse or the like, a check mark is written in the large unit check box 1103.
  • the large unit label 1102 is displayed in red indicating the selected state, and when no check mark is written in the large unit check box 1103, the large unit label 1102 is displayed in gray indicating the non-selected state.
  • This large unit label 1102 changes reversibly in the same manner as the large unit button 802 on the unit selection screen 801 in FIG. Clicking the large unit check box 1103 of the gray large unit label 1102 in a non-selected state with a mouse or the like to mark a check mark, and changing the large unit label 1102 to red in the selected state directly below the large unit label 1102
  • the difficulty level selection mark 1104 is expanded and displayed.
  • the difficulty level selection mark 1104 is provided with a level selection frame 1105. By moving the level selection frame 1105 up and down with a mouse or the like, the difficulty level of the problem of the small unit belonging to the large unit can be selected.
  • the large unit check box 1103 of the gray large unit label 1102 in the non-selected state is clicked with a mouse or the like to mark it and the large unit label 1102 is changed to red in the selected state, the large unit label 1102 is displayed.
  • the question number entry column is displayed on the right side of.
  • FIG. 12 is a partially enlarged view of the regular screen created by the second unit setting unit 403 of the exercise creation cgi 120.
  • the regular screen 1201 is created based on the layout of the unit system diagram 701 described above, and FIG. 12 is partially enlarged to show the details.
  • the large unit label 1202 is a toggle-type display label similar to the large unit label 1102 on the easy order screen 1101 described above. When the large unit check box 1203 at the upper left of the large unit label 1202 is clicked with a mouse or the like, when the large unit check box 1203 is checked, the large unit label 1102 is displayed in red indicating the selected state.
  • the large unit label 1202 When no check mark is written in the large unit check box 1203, the large unit label 1202 is displayed in gray indicating a non-selected state.
  • the large unit label 1202 also reversibly changes in the same manner as the large unit label 1102 on the easy order screen 1101 in FIG. Click the large unit check box 1203 of the gray large unit label 1202 in the non-selected state to mark it with a mouse or the like, and change the large unit label 1202 to red in the selected state.
  • the small unit label 803 is expanded and displayed.
  • a difficulty level setting pull-down menu 1204 is provided on the left side of the small unit label 803, and a difficulty level can be set for each small unit.
  • a question number entry column 1205 is displayed on the right side of the small unit label 803. By inputting a number indicating the number of questions in the question number entry column 1205, the number of questions of the question of the small unit can be set.
  • FIG. 13 is a partially enlarged view of the full customization screen created by the third unit setting unit 404 of the exercise creation cgi 120.
  • the full customization screen 1301 is created in tabular form without using the layout of the unit system diagram 701 in order to set a more detailed form of the questions than the regular screen 1201 described above.
  • Display items are a large unit item 1302, a small unit item 1303, a difficulty level item 1304, a grade item 1305, achievement achievement test result item 1306, and a question number entry item 1307 from the left side.
  • a check box 1308 is provided for each of the large unit item 1302 and the small unit item 1303.
  • the check box 1308 is checked in advance. It is attached. This is created based on the content of the academic achievement field, which is the result of the achievement comprehension test 630, in the student cram school result history table 510.
  • the question number entry field 1307 is provided with a question number entry field 1309 for each difficulty level. Since this question number entry field 1309 is provided for each difficulty level, a plurality of difficulty level questions can be set for one small unit. This is particularly effective when there is a large discrepancy in the student's academic ability with respect to the difficulty level of the desired school. In other words, the ability is effectively improved by digesting easy problems first and gradually increasing the difficulty level.
  • the problems are classified into small units and further classified into five levels of difficulty corresponding to the students' academic ability. Then, a problem with an appropriate difficulty level is selected so that the student can quickly reach the target academic ability.
  • the learning cram school system 101 strongly depends on the difficulty level of the problem, and thus a high objectivity is required for the difficulty level of the problem. And the difficulty of the problem is likely to change with the times.
  • the difficulty level of a single problem varies depending on the degree of completion of textbooks distributed at schools and changes in educational methods implemented by the school board. Of course, such changes are likely to include regional factors. Therefore, the difficulty of the problem must always be maintained.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 provides a problem difficulty level adjustment function for adjusting the difficulty level of each problem stored in the problem difficulty level table 507 using the student cram school result history table 510.
  • FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a flow of operations of the problem maintenance cgi 121.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 is executed by the person in charge of maintenance of the cram school server 102, not the manager of the cram school.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 first creates an html document that forms a menu screen to be displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • This html document is an html document for designating a small unit and a difficulty level of a problem whose difficulty is to be adjusted. This is not necessarily essential, but is a process for narrowing down the problem to be processed first to some extent.
  • the html document created by the problem maintenance cgi 121 is displayed on the display unit 105 of the client 103.
  • the maintenance person selects a small unit to be processed and a difficulty level.
  • the selected content is sent from the client 103 to the problem maintenance cgi 121.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 narrows down and searches the problem difficulty level table 507 using the small unit and difficulty specified by the client 103, and outputs the extracted problem codes to a temporary list (S1402).
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 selects the problem code of the first record in the temporary list (S1403).
  • the question maintenance cgi 121 performs a correct answer rate determination process for the question code of the record selected from the temporary list (S1404). After performing the correct answer rate determination process, the problem maintenance cgi 121 selects the next record of the record in the currently selected temporary list (S1405). Then, it is confirmed whether or not there is a next record (S1406). If there is a record (NO in S1406), the process returns to step S1404 again to continue the process. If there is no record (YES in S1406), problem maintenance cgi 121 is included in the difficulty level change target list (described later in FIG. 15) created in step S1404, and the problem code whose correct answer rate exceeds the predetermined threshold range.
  • FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the flow of the correct answer rate determination process. It is a detail of step S1404 of FIG.
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 acquires a registration date for the difficulty level selected by the client 103 of the currently selected problem code (S1502).
  • the question maintenance cgi 121 records in the student question / scoring history table 116 a record of a student who has received the academic ability grasp test 630 of the question of the question code after the registration date and has the academic ability equivalent to the difficulty level of the question.
  • the correct answer rate is calculated by adding the values in the scoring result field of the student record (S1503).
  • the problem maintenance cgi 121 compares the calculated correct answer rate with a predetermined threshold range (S1504). If the correct answer rate falls outside the predetermined threshold range (YES in S1504), the problem maintenance cgi 121 adds the problem code to the difficulty level change target list (S1505). On the contrary, if the correct answer rate is a value included in the predetermined threshold range (NO in S1504), the problem maintenance cgi 121 does nothing. Then, a series of processing ends (S1506).
  • FIG. 16A, FIG. 16B, and FIG. 16C are time charts illustrating a time-series flow of problem maintenance operations.
  • FIG. 16A shows a time series of the difficulty levels assigned to the problem X. Since the maintenance staff has updated the difficulty level of the problem X on the difficulty level update date P1602, the difficulty level is C before the difficulty level update date P1602 and the difficulty level is B after the difficulty level update date P1602. It has been changed.
  • FIG. 16B shows a time series of student A's academic ability related to question X. Student A took the achievement test 630 on the test implementation date P1603 before the difficulty update date P1602, and solved the question X.
  • Student A's academic ability related to question X is C before the test date P1603, C after the test date P1603 and before the test date P1604, and B after the test date P1604.
  • FIG. 16C shows a time series of student A's academic ability related to question X. Student B took the achievement test 630 on the test implementation date P1603 before the difficulty update date P1602, and solved the question X. Student B's academic ability related to question X is C before the test date P1603, B after the test date P1603 and before the test date P1604, and A after the test date P1604. .
  • the difficulty level assigned to the problem X is B.
  • the student A has solved the problem X in the state of the academic ability B after the test implementation date P1604.
  • the student B has solved the problem X in the state of the academic ability A after the test implementation date P1604.
  • the validity of the difficulty level is calculated by calculating the correct answer rate of students with academic ability corresponding to the difficulty level initially set for the question. In FIG. 16, the score of the question X of the student who has academic ability B like the student A is totaled to calculate the correct answer rate.
  • the correct answer rate of students of other academic ability is referred to.
  • the correct answer rate for students of academic ability B of question X is 60%, and the threshold range is 75% or more. In such a case, it can be determined that the problem X has a high difficulty level for the student of the academic ability B, and the value of the difficulty level B is not appropriate. Therefore, the correct answer rate for students with academic ability A of question X is calculated.
  • the scoring results of a student such as student B are totaled, the correct answer rate is calculated, whether it is within the threshold range, and if it is appropriate, the difficulty level is changed from B to A.
  • the cram school system of this embodiment is designed on the assumption that it will be introduced into a franchise or directly managed cram school, but this system can be easily applied to correspondence education as it is. is there. Students can operate a personal computer at home, connect to the cram school server 102, register their own basic information, information on the school they want, etc., take an academic achievement test, and receive a result form. Even if a human resource equivalent to the room manager is not near the student, a collection of exercises can be created based on the input result of the student.
  • the cram school server 102 has realized the main functions with cgi, but the method of providing such functions is not limited to cgi. Since the web server only needs to be able to create a dynamic html document, for example, a Java (registered trademark) applet may be used. Further, Ajax (Asynchronous JavaScript (registered trademark) + XML) may be introduced as necessary.
  • Java registered trademark
  • Ajax Asynchronous JavaScript (registered trademark) + XML
  • the learning cram server 102 described in the present embodiment has been described as a configuration in which the web server and the database server are integrated, but these may be separated and each may be configured independently. Furthermore, when the traffic of the cram school server 102 increases, the login management server (corresponding to the user master 111), the student basic information management server (corresponding to the student basic information DB 113), and the student school management according to the data handling the database. A server (corresponding to the student aspiring school DB 115), a student assignment / grading history server (corresponding to the student assignment / grading history table 116), a problem server (corresponding to the question DB 117), a student achievement history server (corresponding to the student achievement history DB 119), Each database may be separated and independent.
  • a student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name;
  • a problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit that is a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing the name of the small unit
  • a small unit master comprising: A problem table comprising the problem code field, the small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the problem entity;
  • a problem difficulty level table comprising: the problem code field; and a difficulty level field for storing a problem difficulty level that is the difficulty level of the problem;
  • a desired school master comprising a school code field for storing a school code for uniquely identifying a school, and a deviation value field for storing a deviation value of the school;
  • a desired school information table comprising: the student code
  • the degree of difficulty corresponding to the small unit is presented to the client in a changeable manner, the learning content and the degree of difficulty are designated again from the client, and the record of the corresponding record from the problem table is received.
  • ⁇ 2 >> The test creation server according to ⁇ 1 >>, wherein the problem difficulty level corresponds one-to-one with the desired school difficulty level.
  • a student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name;
  • a problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit that is a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing the name of the small unit
  • a small unit master comprising: A problem table comprising the problem code field, the small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the problem entity;
  • a problem difficulty level table comprising: the problem code field; and a difficulty level field for storing a problem difficulty level that is the difficulty level of the problem;
  • a desired school master comprising a school code field for storing a school code for uniquely identifying a school, and a deviation value field for storing a deviation value of the school;
  • a desired school information table comprising: the student code field; and the school code field storing the school code as
  • a result form creation server comprising a processing unit.
  • a student cram school result history table comprising: the student code field; the small unit field; the question code field; the test execution date field; and an academic ability field that stores a student's academic ability for the small unit;
  • the test result processing unit adds up the correct / wrong result field of the student assignment / scoring history table for each small unit, calculates the academic ability of the student in the small unit, and Record in the student history table
  • the small unit field a large unit field that indicates learning content of a superordinate concept of the small unit and includes one or more small units, and a large unit name field that stores the name of the large unit Comprising a large unit master
  • the test result processing unit describes a plurality of the small unit names in the result form for each of the same large unit, calculates the results for each large unit, and outputs the results to the result form.
  • ⁇ 6 The result form output by the test result processing unit arranges the time series of grades and semesters on the vertical axis, and arranges the learning content category corresponding to the superordinate concept of the unit on the horizontal axis,
  • the macro units described in the result form are arranged along the contents indicated by the vertical axis and the horizontal axis, and the relationship between the macro units related to each other is clearly indicated.
  • the result form creation server described in the above ⁇ 5 >>.
  • a student basic information table comprising a student code field for storing a student code for uniquely identifying a student, and a name field for storing a student's name;
  • a problem code field for storing a problem code for uniquely identifying a problem, a small unit field for storing a small unit code indicating a small unit that is a learning content of the problem, and a small unit name field for storing the name of the small unit
  • a small unit master comprising: The small unit field, a large unit field that indicates learning content of a superordinate concept of the small unit and includes one or more small units, and a large unit name field that stores the name of the large unit
  • a large unit master with A problem table comprising the problem code field, the small unit field, and a problem data field for storing the problem entity;
  • a problem difficulty level table comprising: the problem code field; and a difficulty level field for storing a problem difficulty level that is the difficulty level of the problem; Display a predetermined input screen on the client, receive a predetermined designation
  • the practice question creation unit displays the input screen for selecting the large unit and the difficulty level of the problem belonging to the large unit and designating the number of questions of the problem belonging to the large unit on the client.
  • the substance of the question in the corresponding record is read from the question table, and a practice question collection is created and output to the client.
  • ⁇ 9 The input screen created by the exercise collection creation unit arranges a time series of grades and semesters on the vertical axis, and arranges a learning content category corresponding to the superordinate concept of the unit on the horizontal axis,
  • the macro units described on the input screen are arranged along the contents indicated by the vertical axis and the horizontal axis, and the relationship between the macro units related to each other is clearly indicated.
  • the practice question creating unit displays the input screen for selecting the difficulty of the small unit and the small unit belonging to the large unit and specifying the number of questions of the question belonging to the small unit to the client,
  • the entity of the problem in the corresponding record is read from the problem table, and an exercise question collection is created and output to the client
  • ⁇ 11 The input screen created by the exercise collection creation unit arranges a time series of grades and semesters on the vertical axis, and arranges a learning content category corresponding to the superordinate concept of the unit on the horizontal axis,
  • the macro units described on the input screen are arranged along the contents indicated by the vertical axis and the horizontal axis, and the relationship between the macro units related to each other is clearly indicated.
  • a selection column for selecting the difficulty level for the selected large unit and a question number entry column for specifying the number of questions are specified.
  • the exercise problem collection creating server described in the above ⁇ 10 >>.
  • the practice question creation unit displays the input screen for selecting the large unit and the small unit belonging to the large unit and designating the number of questions for each small unit on the client, and from the client
  • the problem entity of the corresponding record is read from the problem table, and an exercise problem collection is created and output to the client.
  • ⁇ 13 The selection unit for the large unit and the small unit displayed on the input screen reads out the result of the test performed on the students for each small unit, and the small unit that is not the correct answer among all the results. Display the selection field in a pre-selected state,
  • the exercise problem collection creating server described in the above ⁇ 12 >>.
  • the learning cram school system 101 and the learning cram school server 102 used for this are disclosed.
  • the cram school server 102 described in the present embodiment reduces the elements depending on the skill of the room manager or the instructor as much as possible, and improves the student's academic ability reasonably and effectively while minimizing the burden on the student. Therefore, it was built based on the idea of thorough data management. Therefore, the learning school server 102 is configured as a database based on the following design concept. (1) The learning content is subdivided into small units (small unit master 509 of problem DB 117). (2) Register all the problems in the database, classify them in small units, and assign a difficulty level (question table 505 in the problem DB 117).
  • the cram school server 102 includes the above-described database, thereby realizing the following functions.
  • -Ability to create a scholastic ability test to grasp the student's scholastic ability for each small unit ⁇
  • a function to create a result form that clearly shows the student's achievement in small units based on the results of the achievement test (result form output function)
  • ⁇ Ability to re-examine the difficulty level of a problem classified by small unit and difficulty level based on the student's answer history and change the difficulty level as necessary (question difficulty adjustment function)
  • students' academic ability based on the level of difficulty of the desired school students can clarify the academic ability that should be improved in small units.
  • the academic cram school server 102 of this embodiment grasps the student's academic ability in units of small units, makes it possible to clarify which small unit should be learned, and how to create effective exercises. And the difficulty of the problem used in that case is guaranteed very high objectivity by the maintenance work based on statistics.
  • the cram school server 102 can collect valuable data on student achievement.
  • various analyzes can be performed in units of small units. For example, it is possible to statistically find out which small unit is a weak unit by looking at a plurality of result forms of students who are not good at a large unit or a small unit. Interviewing students who have a particular tendency to do this will make it clearer what is causing them. There may be points that were overlooked in previous curriculums.
  • it is possible to easily classify the weak tendency by collecting a plurality of data of students who share a plurality of small units that are weak. If such a typology is possible, it will be relatively easy to create an educational curriculum common to students with the same tendency.
  • the cram school server 102 of the present embodiment systematically implements a policy for rescuing students from the negative spiral of “I don't know” to “I can't” and converting them from “I understand” to “I can”.
  • the analysis and improvement of education curriculum based on such detailed data collection will be an area that is difficult to achieve in school education.
  • Problem difficulty table 508 ... Large unit master, 509 ... Small unit master, 510 ... Student grade record history table, 511 ... Student grade record history table, 630 ... Scholastic ability test, 631 ... Results report, 632 ... Exercise problem collection, 701 ... Unit system diagram, 702 ... Grade semester, 703 ... Learning content category, 704 ... Large unit label, 801 ... Unit selection screen, 802 ... Large unit button, 803 ... Small unit label, 8 4 ... Check box, 901 ... Difficulty level selection screen, 903 ... Small unit display column, 904 ... Difficulty level setting pull-down menu, 1001 ... Large unit learning achievement rate column, 1002 ... Small unit learning achievement rate column, 1101 ...
  • Easy order screen 1102 Large unit label, 1103: Large unit check box, 1104 ... Difficulty level selection mark, 1105 ... Level selection frame, 1201 ... Regular screen, 1202 ... Large unit label, 1203 ... Large unit check box, 1204 ... Difficulty level setting Pull-down menu, 1205 ... Question number entry field, 1301 ... Full customization screen, 1302 ... Large unit item, 1303 ... Small unit item, 1304 ... Difficulty level item, 1305 ... Grade item, 1306 ... Achievement test result item, 1307 ... Questions Number entry, 1308 ... check box, 13 09 ... number of questions

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un serveur de création de tests, un serveur de création de formulaires de résultats, un serveur de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, et un serveur de maintenance de problème ayant pour objet de saisir un niveau de compétence pour chaque contenu d'apprentissage d'un étudiant en détail pour faciliter un examen efficace et créer un manuel d'instructions d'exercices qui est optimalisé pour le niveau de compétence ou similaire pour chaque contenu d'apprentissage de l'étudiant. Le contenu d'apprentissage est segmenté en petites unités, les problèmes sont entièrement enregistrés dans une base de données et classifiés dans les petites unités, un niveau de difficulté est accordé à chacun des problèmes, une performance scolaire de l'étudiant est segmentée en petites unités, la performance scolaire correspondant au niveau de difficulté du problème est mesurée, une transition de la performance scolaire est enregistrée sous la forme d'un historique, et tous les résultats, quand l'étudiant résout les problèmes qui sont accumulés dans la base de données, sont entièrement enregistrés sous la forme d'un historique.
PCT/JP2011/069400 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 Serveur de création de tests, serveur de création de formulaires de résultats, serveur de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, serveur de maintenance de problèmes, programme de création de tests, programme de création de formulaires de résultats, programme de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, et programme de maintenance de problèmes Ceased WO2012043108A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020137009134A KR20130048295A (ko) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 연습 문제집 작성 서버, 및 연습 문제집 작성 프로그램
KR1020147007940A KR20140044410A (ko) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 테스트 작성 서버 및 테스트 작성 프로그램이 기록된 기록 매체
KR1020137009135A KR20130048296A (ko) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 문제 메인터넌스 서버, 및 문제 메인터넌스 프로그램
CN201180003808.XA CN102549634B (zh) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 测试题制作服务器和结果表单制作服务器
KR1020137009133A KR101756245B1 (ko) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 결과 리포트 작성 서버, 및 결과 리포트 작성 프로그램

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010-222150 2010-09-30
JP2010222150 2010-09-30
JP2011-000599 2011-01-05
JP2011000599A JP5989300B2 (ja) 2010-09-30 2011-01-05 学習塾サーバ及び学習塾プログラム

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012043108A1 true WO2012043108A1 (fr) 2012-04-05

Family

ID=45892582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2011/069400 Ceased WO2012043108A1 (fr) 2010-09-30 2011-08-29 Serveur de création de tests, serveur de création de formulaires de résultats, serveur de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, serveur de maintenance de problèmes, programme de création de tests, programme de création de formulaires de résultats, programme de création de manuel d'instructions d'exercices, et programme de maintenance de problèmes

Country Status (5)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5989300B2 (fr)
KR (5) KR101756245B1 (fr)
CN (3) CN102549634B (fr)
TW (1) TWI517111B (fr)
WO (1) WO2012043108A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5952950B1 (ja) * 2015-11-04 2016-07-13 株式会社エジュテックジャパン 学習支援システム及びプログラム
CN106103851A (zh) * 2013-12-26 2016-11-09 斗山英维高株式会社 工程机械的动力控制装置
JP2020118851A (ja) * 2019-01-24 2020-08-06 大日本印刷株式会社 情報処理装置及びプログラム

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101401722B1 (ko) * 2013-12-24 2014-05-30 박형용 개인 맞춤형 온라인 학습 시스템
CN105373977A (zh) * 2014-08-29 2016-03-02 风腾科技（北京）有限公司 课程教学系统和课程教学系统的操作方法
CN104391688A (zh) * 2014-11-04 2015-03-04 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 一种教学资源处理方法及系统
CN107004373A (zh) * 2014-12-03 2017-08-01 索尼公司 信息处理装置、信息处理方法以及计算机程序
CN105070130A (zh) * 2015-08-04 2015-11-18 北京优宇通教育科技有限公司 水平测评方法和系统
JP2017032921A (ja) * 2015-08-06 2017-02-09 株式会社ワオ・コーポレーション 過去問情報処理装置、過去問情報処理方法、およびプログラム
CN105118348B (zh) * 2015-08-20 2017-10-03 浙江通关教育科技有限公司 基于知识点体系的学科选题方法
CN105512214A (zh) * 2015-11-28 2016-04-20 华中师范大学 一种知识数据库、构建方法及学情诊断系统
KR101723770B1 (ko) * 2016-02-19 2017-04-06 아주대학교산학협력단 플레이어 매칭 기법에 기반하는 문제 추천 방법 및 그 시스템
CN106547815B (zh) * 2016-09-23 2020-11-27 耀灵人工智能(浙江)有限公司 一种基于大数据的针对性作业生成方法与系统
CN106297458A (zh) * 2016-10-25 2017-01-04 合肥东上多媒体科技有限公司 一种智能多媒体教学管理平台
CN106409034B (zh) * 2016-11-24 2019-05-03 广东小天才科技有限公司 一种家庭作业的智能布置方法及设备
JP6841498B2 (ja) * 2017-01-27 2021-03-10 株式会社なるほどゼミナール 学習支援装置、方法、及びコンピュータプログラム
KR101853091B1 (ko) * 2017-05-19 2018-04-27 (주)뤼이드 기계학습이 적용된 사용자 답변 예측 프레임워크를 통한 개인 맞춤형 교육 컨텐츠 제공 방법, 장치 및 컴퓨터 프로그램
CN107220917B (zh) * 2017-06-06 2020-05-08 高岩峰 一种自动生成等价测题的系统
CN108021613A (zh) * 2017-11-02 2018-05-11 浙江工商大学 一种试题对相关度在线计算的方法
CN107944105A (zh) * 2017-11-14 2018-04-20 新疆智尚高科电子科技有限公司 基于triz理论的石油化工产品设计平台及其方法
JP7096671B2 (ja) * 2018-01-19 2022-07-06 株式会社ベネッセコーポレーション 学習支援システム
CN110211441A (zh) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-06 上海乂学教育科技有限公司 自动标记试题难度自动标记、推送方法及系统
JP7410725B2 (ja) * 2020-01-07 2024-01-10 株式会社ベネッセコーポレーション 管理装置、方法及びプログラム
JP7559510B2 (ja) * 2020-11-04 2024-10-02 大日本印刷株式会社 学習支援装置、学習支援方法及びプログラム
JP7563120B2 (ja) * 2020-11-04 2024-10-08 大日本印刷株式会社 学習支援装置、学習支援方法及びプログラム
CN112184089B (zh) * 2020-11-27 2021-03-09 北京世纪好未来教育科技有限公司 试题难度预测模型的训练方法、装置、设备及存储介质
KR102667282B1 (ko) * 2020-12-31 2024-05-20 (주)강안교육 스마트 온라인 강의방법 및 강의 시스템
JP7154637B2 (ja) * 2021-02-10 2022-10-18 株式会社なるほどゼミナール 学習支援装置、方法、及びコンピュータプログラム
KR102607385B1 (ko) * 2021-04-06 2023-11-29 주식회사 아이스크림에듀 Ai학습장치 및 ai학습계획을 제공하는 방법
JP7670534B2 (ja) * 2021-04-15 2025-04-30 株式会社ワオ・コーポレーション 教育支援装置、教育支援方法、およびプログラム
JP7643198B2 (ja) * 2021-06-15 2025-03-11 大日本印刷株式会社 教育支援装置、教育支援方法及びプログラム
CN113506052B (zh) * 2021-09-10 2021-11-23 北京世纪好未来教育科技有限公司 能力评测方法及相关装置
CN113849627B (zh) * 2021-11-29 2022-07-12 北京世纪好未来教育科技有限公司 训练任务生成方法、装置及计算机存储介质
WO2024214751A1 (fr) * 2023-04-11 2024-10-17 ソフトバンクグループ株式会社 Système de commande de comportement

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0830187A (ja) * 1994-07-20 1996-02-02 Shiyuusui:Kk 自動採点装置と採点表示方法及びこれらに用いられる解答用紙
WO2002019295A1 (fr) * 2000-08-31 2002-03-07 Jes Co., Ltd. Procede et systeme de support d'apprentissage
JP2002202711A (ja) * 2000-12-28 2002-07-19 Casio Comput Co Ltd 受験学習支援システム、受験学習支援装置及び受験学習支援方法
JP2002287608A (ja) * 2001-03-27 2002-10-04 Ideia Corporation:Kk 学習支援システム
JP2003216015A (ja) * 2002-01-22 2003-07-30 Aruze Corp 学習システム
JP2004117947A (ja) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-15 Virtual N:Kk 学習システム
JP2005242018A (ja) * 2004-02-26 2005-09-08 Takuto:Kk 個別カリキュラム作成システム、個別カリキュラム作成方法およびプログラム
JP2007293252A (ja) * 2006-03-31 2007-11-08 Fujitsu Ltd 学習管理プログラム及び学習管理装置

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2911375B2 (ja) * 1994-12-12 1999-06-23 株式会社学習研究社 問題作成装置
JP3818825B2 (ja) * 2000-04-14 2006-09-06 アイリス株式会社 通信網を利用した学習者個別学習計画書作成提供システム
JP2003058044A (ja) * 2001-08-10 2003-02-28 Okayama Fukutake Shoten:Kk 学習教材、同学習教材の作成システム、及び学習支援システム
JP2003255818A (ja) * 2002-03-01 2003-09-10 Nippon Yunishisu Kk 学習支援システム及び学習支援装置、並びに学習支援プログラム
CN1744148A (zh) * 2004-08-31 2006-03-08 英业达股份有限公司 一种远程教学系统及其方法
KR100784298B1 (ko) * 2006-01-17 2007-12-13 문상주 학습관리시스템
CN101149874A (zh) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-26 刘守纹 游戏式学习系统及方法
JP2010107787A (ja) * 2008-10-30 2010-05-13 Cosmotopia Japan Inc 評価分析システム
CN101807356A (zh) * 2009-02-13 2010-08-18 高荣冠 英文程度定位方法
CN101770702A (zh) * 2010-03-26 2010-07-07 武汉福来尔科技有限公司 手持式学习诊断分析装置

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0830187A (ja) * 1994-07-20 1996-02-02 Shiyuusui:Kk 自動採点装置と採点表示方法及びこれらに用いられる解答用紙
WO2002019295A1 (fr) * 2000-08-31 2002-03-07 Jes Co., Ltd. Procede et systeme de support d'apprentissage
JP2002202711A (ja) * 2000-12-28 2002-07-19 Casio Comput Co Ltd 受験学習支援システム、受験学習支援装置及び受験学習支援方法
JP2002287608A (ja) * 2001-03-27 2002-10-04 Ideia Corporation:Kk 学習支援システム
JP2003216015A (ja) * 2002-01-22 2003-07-30 Aruze Corp 学習システム
JP2004117947A (ja) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-15 Virtual N:Kk 学習システム
JP2005242018A (ja) * 2004-02-26 2005-09-08 Takuto:Kk 個別カリキュラム作成システム、個別カリキュラム作成方法およびプログラム
JP2007293252A (ja) * 2006-03-31 2007-11-08 Fujitsu Ltd 学習管理プログラム及び学習管理装置

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106103851A (zh) * 2013-12-26 2016-11-09 斗山英维高株式会社 工程机械的动力控制装置
CN106103851B (zh) * 2013-12-26 2018-02-09 斗山英维高株式会社 工程机械的动力控制装置
JP5952950B1 (ja) * 2015-11-04 2016-07-13 株式会社エジュテックジャパン 学習支援システム及びプログラム
JP2020118851A (ja) * 2019-01-24 2020-08-06 大日本印刷株式会社 情報処理装置及びプログラム
JP7247600B2 (ja) 2019-01-24 2023-03-29 大日本印刷株式会社 情報処理装置及びプログラム

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20130048295A (ko) 2013-05-09
JP2012093691A (ja) 2012-05-17
CN105118349A (zh) 2015-12-02
CN102549634A (zh) 2012-07-04
TWI517111B (zh) 2016-01-11
KR101756245B1 (ko) 2017-07-10
JP5989300B2 (ja) 2016-09-07
KR20120049178A (ko) 2012-05-16
TW201229978A (en) 2012-07-16
KR20130048296A (ko) 2013-05-09
KR20130048797A (ko) 2013-05-10
CN105070131A (zh) 2015-11-18
KR20140044410A (ko) 2014-04-14
CN102549634B (zh) 2015-08-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5989300B2 (ja) 学習塾サーバ及び学習塾プログラム
Canrinus et al. Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective
Gutiérrez et al. A growth curve analysis of literacy performance among second-grade, Spanish-speaking, English-language learners
Hampton et al. Examining the technical adequacy of progress monitoring using early writing curriculum-based measures
JP2020016871A (ja) 情報処理装置及びプログラム
Blackburn Effectiveness of eLearning in statistics: Pictures and stories
Richardson et al. Evaluating English learner progress in reading: How much growth can we expect?
McGrane et al. Applying a thurstonian, two-stage method in the standardized assessment of writing
Laxdal et al. Gender and the perceived learning environment in upper secondary school physical education
Leo et al. Teaching methodology instruments in physical education: A systematic review
Davis et al. The edTPA and physical education teacher education: Working in tandem to prepare successful teachers
Tan Tensions in the biology laboratory: What are they?
Knight-Teague et al. Empirical investigation of word callers who are English learners
Johnson et al. Aligning instructional practices to meet the academic needs of adult ESL students
Thouësny Assessing second language learners’ written texts: An interventionist and interactionist approach to dynamic assessment
Santharooban Analyzing the level of information literacy skills of medical undergraduate of Eastern University, Sri Lanka
Yan et al. Development of a Profile-Based Writing Scale: How collaboration with teachers enhanced assessment practice in a post-admission ESL writing program at a USA University
Lusardi et al. Who is Most Affected by Covid-19?
Wewer English language assessment in bilingual CLIL instruction at the primary level in Finland: Search for updated and valid assessment methods
JP2018146845A (ja) 情報表示装置、学習管理システム、情報表示方法及び情報表示プログラム
Denisova et al. Quality indicators of the classroom-online learning under uncertainty conditions
JP2004069746A (ja) 答案採点方法、答案採点システム、プログラム
Gurusinghe et al. Students’ Perception Regarding the Teaching Strategies of Government ESL School Teachers and Private Tutors: With Special Reference to a Grade Nine Government School in Galle, Sri Lanka
Pantzare Validating standard setting: comparing judgmental and statistical linking
Bason et al. Reviewing Literature on Tier I Implementation Fidelity in Foundational Reading Skills: Trends, Measurement Methods, and Facilitators vs. Barriers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201180003808.X

Country of ref document: CN

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20117026986

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11828669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11828669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1