[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2011118866A1 - Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau - Google Patents

Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011118866A1
WO2011118866A1 PCT/KR2010/001882 KR2010001882W WO2011118866A1 WO 2011118866 A1 WO2011118866 A1 WO 2011118866A1 KR 2010001882 W KR2010001882 W KR 2010001882W WO 2011118866 A1 WO2011118866 A1 WO 2011118866A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
email
mail
server
reviewers
audit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/KR2010/001882
Other languages
English (en)
Korean (ko)
Inventor
김범석
김대중
임진모
이동현
박은영
이승태
최원혁
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation of Yonsei University
Original Assignee
Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation of Yonsei University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation of Yonsei University filed Critical Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation of Yonsei University
Priority to PCT/KR2010/001882 priority Critical patent/WO2011118866A1/fr
Publication of WO2011118866A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011118866A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for requesting an audit using a network.
  • a clinical trial is a test on the safety and efficacy of a drug or product used in humans. Before conducting a clinical trial directly related to humans, the clinical trial review board (IRB) must review it. It is legalized to go through.
  • IRS clinical trial review board
  • the review conducted by the Institutional Review Board is conducted by a number of reviewers.
  • reviewers are conducted by a plurality of independent institutions because a plurality of reviewers are rarely gathered in a single institution.
  • communication between reviewers is not easy during the deliberation process.
  • the screening process may cause an error depending on the screening task in the screening task in the Institutional Review Board, but when the content reviewed by one institution is reviewed by another institution In some cases, the contents of examinations at each organization may conflict with each other. For this reason, communication at each institution where deliberations take place is an important factor.
  • the examination period may be performed for a long time, and as described above, there may be a problem that duplication or conflict of the examination contents occurs.
  • the present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and even if the audit is conducted by a plurality of independent auditors to provide an audit request method through a network that can facilitate communication at each audit institution. have.
  • an audit request method through a network includes: an audit task registration step in which an audit task to be audited by an institution that participated in the audit is registered on a server; An email transmission step of transmitting, at the server, an email (e-mail) requesting at least one auditor for performing the audit on the audit task that the audit task is registered in the server; A notification message transmission step of transmitting, by the server, a notification message informing that the email has been transmitted to the mobile communication terminal of the at least one examiner; Characterized in that it comprises a.
  • the one or more examiners are a plurality, and the email transmission step is characterized in that for transmitting the email to the plurality of examiners sequentially one by one.
  • the one or more examiners are plural, and the sending of the email is characterized in that the emails of the plurality of examiners are bundled by domains and the emails are sequentially transmitted for each domain.
  • the e-mail confirmation determination step of the server determines whether the at least one reviewer has confirmed the e-mail for the e-mail sent to the at least one reviewer in the e-mail transmission step;
  • the notification message transmitting step may further include transmitting the notification message to any one of the at least one examiner when it is determined that one of the at least one examiner has not checked the email for a predetermined period of time.
  • the notification message is characterized in that the transmission.
  • the examiner can be notified to the examiner about the registered examination task, and the examiner can be surely and accurately informed.
  • the number of e-mails that are sent simultaneously can be controlled by sending one by one or grouping the domains of the reviewer e-mails, which can be treated as spam mails that can occur as many e-mails are sent to multiple reviewers at the same time. There is an effect that can be prevented from processing.
  • 1 is a flow chart showing the flow of the audit request method through the network of the present invention.
  • the examination task to be reviewed for the clinical trial is applied by the researcher who wants to conduct the clinical trial or by the supporter who supports it.In this stage, the research project and the sponsor's institution are reviewed on the server operated by the clinical trial committee.
  • the application is made by uploading documents such as an application form.
  • the clinical trial review committee checks whether the application has been completed including all necessary matters about the screening task in which the application was made, and a normal application was made. Review tasks are registered with the Institutional Review Board.
  • step S102 the audit task is requested to a plurality of auditors who can audit the registered audit task, such as safety, effectiveness, and whether it is suitable for use or use. Send an email to request a number of reviewers to review the project.
  • the reviewer requests the reviewer and sends an email to a number of reviewers to inform the reviewer that they have been registered with the Institutional Review Board. Is sent as a single server, misleading as spam. As a result, some of the reviewers may be treated as spam e-mail sent from the server, not knowing whether the request was submitted to the review task.
  • each reviewer can prevent important emails from being treated as spam by specially managing the emails received.
  • the server sends emails to multiple reviewers in order to prevent spam from being sent from the server. It is possible to prevent.
  • step S103 when an email is sent to the plurality of reviewers, a notification message indicating that the email has been sent is transmitted to the plurality of reviewers.
  • a review task for the clinical trial is registered in the server of the clinical trial review committee, and the review is performed. It is possible to inform multiple reviewers that an e-mail has been sent stating that a must be done.
  • the examiner can know that the e-mail has been received from the server of the clinical trial examination committee by sending a notification message about it.
  • the server judges whether or not the plurality of reviewers has confirmed the email sent in step S103, and the image included in the email has been read by sending an email including a small image in an email sent to the plurality of reviewers. It is possible to determine whether a number of reviewers have checked each e-mail, for example, using a method of checking whether the e-mail is determined.
  • step S114 it is determined whether a plurality of examiners who have received e-mails have checked the e-mails, and if there are reviewers who do not check e-mails after a certain period of time has elapsed, a notification message is transmitted to the examiner's mobile communication terminal.
  • the review task was registered to 100 reviewers, and a notification email was sent to the reviewer regarding the registered review task, and 70 reviewers checked the email sent in step S114 for a period of two days. If judges have not yet verified the email, this step sends a notification message to 30 reviewers who have not verified the email, and has not yet confirmed the email by sending a notification message that has sent the email and prompts the user to confirm the email. It is possible to encourage reviewers who do not have access to the emails sent.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant de demander une évaluation au moyen d'un réseau, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes : enregistrer une tâche pour une évaluation sur un serveur ; transmettre un message électronique pour demander l'évaluation de la tâche par un évaluateur ou plus ; transmettre un message de notification, qui notifie la transmission du message électronique, à un terminal de communication mobile ; et notifier l'évaluateur de la tâche enregistrée pour l'évaluation, la demande d'évaluation étant efficacement fournie à l'évaluateur de façon plus fiable et plus précise.
PCT/KR2010/001882 2010-03-26 2010-03-26 Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau Ceased WO2011118866A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/KR2010/001882 WO2011118866A1 (fr) 2010-03-26 2010-03-26 Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/KR2010/001882 WO2011118866A1 (fr) 2010-03-26 2010-03-26 Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011118866A1 true WO2011118866A1 (fr) 2011-09-29

Family

ID=44673395

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/KR2010/001882 Ceased WO2011118866A1 (fr) 2010-03-26 2010-03-26 Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2011118866A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12024724B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2024-07-02 Replimune Limited Oncolytic virus strain
US12059444B2 (en) 2017-01-09 2024-08-13 Replimune Limited Altered virus

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003067305A (ja) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-07 Yamaha Corp メール配信装置、及びプログラム
KR20030081768A (ko) * 2002-04-12 2003-10-22 신흥섭 임상정보관리방법
KR20050027897A (ko) * 2003-12-29 2005-03-21 엔에이치엔(주) 네트워크를 통한 메일 알림 시스템 및 그 방법
KR20060076650A (ko) * 2004-12-29 2006-07-04 사회복지법인 삼성생명공익재단 Ｉｒｂ 심사 시스템 및 그 방법
US20100023870A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2010-01-28 Baker Matthew R Apparatus and method for integrated management of clinical trials and studies at an irb

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003067305A (ja) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-07 Yamaha Corp メール配信装置、及びプログラム
KR20030081768A (ko) * 2002-04-12 2003-10-22 신흥섭 임상정보관리방법
KR20050027897A (ko) * 2003-12-29 2005-03-21 엔에이치엔(주) 네트워크를 통한 메일 알림 시스템 및 그 방법
KR20060076650A (ko) * 2004-12-29 2006-07-04 사회복지법인 삼성생명공익재단 Ｉｒｂ 심사 시스템 및 그 방법
US20100023870A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2010-01-28 Baker Matthew R Apparatus and method for integrated management of clinical trials and studies at an irb

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12024724B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2024-07-02 Replimune Limited Oncolytic virus strain
US12049647B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2024-07-30 Replimune Limited Engineered virus
US12397053B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2025-08-26 Replimune Limited Engineered virus
US12458696B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2025-11-04 Replimune Limited Modified oncolytic virus
US12465639B2 (en) 2016-01-08 2025-11-11 Replimune Limited GB Modified oncolytic virus
US12059444B2 (en) 2017-01-09 2024-08-13 Replimune Limited Altered virus

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Schopper et al. Research ethics governance in times of Ebola
Golden et al. Modernizing field services for human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections in the United States
Aung et al. Interventions for increasing HIV testing uptake in migrants: a systematic review of evidence
Costard et al. Partitioning, a novel approach to mitigate the risk and impact of African swine fever in affected areas
WO2011118866A1 (fr) Procédé de demande d'évaluation au moyen d'un réseau
Moonesinghe et al. Design and methodology of SNAP-1: a Sprint National Anaesthesia Project to measure patient reported outcome after anaesthesia
Waltenburg et al. A survey of current activities and technologies used to detect carbapenem resistance in bacteria isolated from companion animals at veterinary diagnostic laboratories—United States, 2020
McLean et al. Can a smartphone-delivered tool facilitate the assessment of surgical site infection and result in earlier treatment? Tracking wound infection with smartphone technology (TWIST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients
KR20110108165A (ko) 네트워크를 통한 심사요청 방법
Don Bamunusinghage Nihal et al. Challenges and opportunities for wildlife disease surveillance in Sri Lanka
Kite et al. Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
Robinson et al. Factors influencing diagnostic sample submission by food animal veterinarians in Mississippi
Usher et al. Influence of COVID-19 on the preventive health behaviours of indigenous peoples of Australia residing in New South Wales: a mixed-method study protocol
Sawras et al. Assessing complex interventions: a systematic review of outcomes used in randomised controlled trials on STI partner notification in high-income countries
Horváth et al. Models of good practice to enhance infectious disease care cascades among people who inject drugs: a qualitative study of interventions implemented in European settings
KR20110007498A (ko) 네트워크를 통한 다기관 심사 방법 및 이를 이용한 시스템
CN104318475B (zh) 一种获取模拟回执的方法和装置
Davis et al. Alternative approaches to partner notification, diagnosis, and treatment: Perspectives of New York county health departments, 2007
McDonald et al. Framework for Just Culture: Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline
KR102640469B1 (ko) 메시지 수신자 정보를 확인할 수 있는 메시지 관리 시스템
Kennedy et al. One Health security lessons from a year-long webinar series on international COVID-19 response
Monaghan et al. Understanding the role of patient communication protocols in sexually transmissible infections point-of-care testing among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in remote communities: a qualitative study
Ulucan et al. Interventions to Prevent HIV Infection with Migrants and Refugees: A Systematic Review/Gocmenlere ve Siginmacilara HIV Enfeksiyonunu Onlemeye Yonelik Yapilan Mudahaleler: Sistematik Derleme.
Franceschelli UNDRR INFO-Managing Biological Risks-Systemic Risk of DRR Strategy
Reddy et al. Public Health is Key to Pandemic Preparedness.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10848508

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10848508

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1