[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2009098180A1 - Procédé pour guider une attaque par torpille - Google Patents

Procédé pour guider une attaque par torpille Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009098180A1
WO2009098180A1 PCT/EP2009/051145 EP2009051145W WO2009098180A1 WO 2009098180 A1 WO2009098180 A1 WO 2009098180A1 EP 2009051145 W EP2009051145 W EP 2009051145W WO 2009098180 A1 WO2009098180 A1 WO 2009098180A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
torpedo
target
torpedoes
spectra
sonar
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2009/051145
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Gerrit Plümecke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Atlas Elektronik GmbH
Original Assignee
Atlas Elektronik GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Atlas Elektronik GmbH filed Critical Atlas Elektronik GmbH
Publication of WO2009098180A1 publication Critical patent/WO2009098180A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B19/00—Marine torpedoes, e.g. launched by surface vessels or submarines; Sea mines having self-propulsion means
    • F42B19/01—Steering control
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G8/00—Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
    • B63G8/28—Arrangement of offensive or defensive equipment
    • B63G8/32—Arrangement of offensive or defensive equipment of torpedo-launching means; of torpedo stores or handlers
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S15/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of acoustic waves, e.g. sonar systems
    • G01S15/02—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of acoustic waves, e.g. sonar systems using reflection of acoustic waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S3/00—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received
    • G01S3/80—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • G01S3/801—Details
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S3/00—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received
    • G01S3/80—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • G01S3/802—Systems for determining direction or deviation from predetermined direction
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S3/00—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received
    • G01S3/80—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • G01S3/82—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves with means for adjusting phase or compensating for time-lag errors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S3/00—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received
    • G01S3/80—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • G01S3/84—Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves with indication presented on cathode-ray tubes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/18—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using ultrasonic, sonic, or infrasonic waves
    • G01S5/20—Position of source determined by a plurality of spaced direction-finders

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for conducting a torpedo attack launched from a platform, in particular from a submarine, according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • a target complex is targeted with a platform sonar installed on the platform, and the positions of the torpedo starting at the target complex, together with the bearing line to the target complex, are continuously displayed in a combat position display.
  • the single-target bearings of the torpedo-ons of the torpedoes approaching the target complex are represented as bearing beams emanating from the current torpedo position.
  • Signals from target bearings of a torpedo-sonar are compared with the signals of the boron-sonar or a torpedo-sonar of another torpedo, and if coincident, a signal tag is displayed in association with at least one of the bearing beams.
  • signals received from target locations of two torpedo-onsignals are compared with one another at the central station.
  • the signals can be processed in a variety of ways and represented, for example, as spectra or partial spectra of the signals or as demodulated partial spectra.
  • the target mark is displayed at the intersection of the two outgoing beams emanating from the positions of the torpedoes.
  • the battle position indicator allows a decision as to which of the two torpedoes should attack the target and which is excluded from the attack.
  • the decision is made by the operator in the control center, who activates the torpedo by releasing the self-steering for attack.
  • the invention is based on the object in a torpedo attack with a large number of torpedoes, which are fired at a targeted target complex, to continuously give the operator an easily manageable and traceable overview of the individual objectives covered by the torpedo so that the operator can assign a single target for each Monitor the torpedo and, if necessary, correct it by manual intervention.
  • the method according to the invention has the advantage of providing the operator with an aid for controlling the fired torpedoes in a torpedo attack on a target complex with a cluster of torpedoes and each of the torpedoes having its own target within the target complex assign.
  • the usual battle situation representation is by the continuous display of the current positions of the torpedoes along with the torpedo-onarial target sightings, the battlefield at launch of a torpedo salvo very confusing.
  • the correlation maximum as a measure for the existing match of the torpedo spectra will result in the measure "1" for the autocorrelation.
  • the correlation maximum of the cross correlation will be close to "1" and close to "0" if the match is low or not
  • Correlation function and the display of the correlation maximum the operator can easily distinguish whether a target is assigned to only one torpedo or two or more torpedoes start the same target. The operator can intervene and release the self-steering of both torpedoes, if the torpedoes have understood different goals, or at Conceiving the same objective, one Torpedo on the target and assign the other Torpedo another destination.
  • target bearings are displayed as the bearing angle ⁇ associated symbols and displayed the symbol for the destination assigned targeting in the color characteristic of the torpedo.
  • the assigned targeting is clarified which of the target bearings of the torpedo son represents the goal assigned to the torpedo, thus representing the target contact of the torpedo, and which torpedo spectrum in the sum spectrogram or sum sonogram belongs to the target contact of the respective torpedo.
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a control unit installed on a platform, connected to the torpedoes of the torpedo cluster via data lines,
  • FIG. 1 schematically shows a scenario of a torpedo attack with a cluster of four torpedoes 11 on a target complex consisting of six individual targets 12 at a time before the torpedoes 11 are released on self-steering with so-called homing in plan view shown.
  • the torpedoes 11 are designated by the letters A, B, C and D and the targets by Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, Z5 and Z6.
  • the four torpedoes 11 have been launched at a great distance from the target complex of a platform, such as a submarine, towards the target complex.
  • the target complex had previously been passively sighted by a Bordsonar installed on the platform, with the bearing capturing the acoustic focus of the target complex.
  • All torpedoes 11 are equipped with a torpedo sonar 13, which receive directionally selective target noise in a known manner and the receiving direction of the target noise as a bearing angle ⁇ , measured against the torpedo axis, deliver.
  • the torpedo sonar 13 is connected via a data line 14, preferably a glass fiber, to a central station 15 installed on the platform. From the center 15 of the torpedo attack is controlled and monitored. As is not further illustrated in the block diagram of FIG.
  • an operator has the option of influencing the steering of the torpedoes 11 by means of steering signals transmitted via the data line 14 and switching the torpedoes 11 to self-steering after destination assignment, after which the torpedoes with the aid of their torpedo sonar 13 autonomously start the assigned destination.
  • the torpedo-sonars 13 form directional characteristics under predetermined receiving directions, so-called preformed beams, and are able to simultaneously grasp and aim several targets within reach of the torpedo sonar 13. If these targets lie in different beams of the torpedo-sonar 13, then they can be separated from one another directionally and a destination direction, the so-called bearing angle ⁇ , can be assigned to each target.
  • preformed beams so-called preformed beams
  • the target complex consisting of six targets 12 is detected by the torpedo nacelles 13 of the four torpedoes 11, the torpedo sonar 13 of the torpedo A, the targets Zl to Z4 under four different bearing angles ⁇ , the torpedo B, the targets Z2, Z3, Z4 and Z5 under four different bearing angles ⁇ , the torpedo C, the targets Z3, Z4 and Z5 under two different bearing angles ⁇ and the torpedo D, the targets Z5 and Z6 at two different bearing angles ⁇ .
  • the target bearings are shown in Fig. 1 by DF beams.
  • the bearing angles of the torpedo sonar 13 of the torpedo C are represented as representative of the bearing angles ⁇ of the torpedo-sonar.
  • the target Z3 is aimed at the bearing angle - ⁇ c3, the target Z4 at the bearing angle - ⁇ C 4, and the target Z5 at the bearing angle + ⁇ C s.
  • the bearing angles ⁇ of the torpedo-sonar 13 of torpedo A would carry the indices A1 to A4, of torpedo B the indices B2 to B5 and of torpedo D the indices D5 and D6.
  • the target bearings of the torpedo-sonars 13 are transmitted via the data lines 14 to the "target bearings" block 16 in the central station 15.
  • the target bearings are graphically processed into an analysis image for the torpedo 11.
  • These analysis images of the torpedoes 11 are shown in FIG 1 is shown by way of example in Fig. 1.
  • the analysis images are presented on a screen 20 to the operator.
  • the target bearings of the torpedo-sonars 13 for each torpedo A to D are shown in association with the bearing angle ⁇ with a circle symbol.
  • the torpedo sonar 13 of the torpedo A aims at targets the bearing angle ⁇ of -20 °, -12.5 °, 0 ° and + 12.5 ° and the torpedo sonar 13 of the torpedo D at the bearing angles ⁇ of -7.5 ° and + 10 °.
  • the operator assigns each torpedo 11 one of the six targeted targets 12.
  • Each assigned target 12 receives a changed symbol in the analysis image by the assignment, in the example of FIG. 3 a square.
  • each torpedo 11 is assigned a characteristic color.
  • the square symbol representing the assigned target is assigned the color associated with the respective torpedo 11. This is symbolically indicated in Fig. 3 with the color information "GREEN”, “RED”, “YELLOW”, “BLUE”.
  • the target noises perceived by the connected targets 12 are transmitted via the data lines 14 to the central station 15.
  • the target noises of the individual torpedo sonars 13 are pre-processed and demodulated, and in the "DEMON analysis” block the spectra of the demodulated target noises are formed.
  • the envelope or envelope of the target noise delivered by the torpedo-sonar 13 is examined with regard to its frequency content and the frequency spectrum is calculated.
  • An example of a DEMON analysis circuit can be found in EP 0 213 541 B1.
  • Each spectrum is superimposed on the color characteristic of the torpedo 11 and the colored spectrum is output as a torpedo spectrum.
  • All torpedo spectra are combined into a summation spectrogram or sum sonogram, in which the different colored spectral lines of all torpedo spectra are contained.
  • the targets 11 of a target complex have distinguishable target noise frequencies, which is usually the case for ship consoles composed of different types of ships, and the torpedoes 11 are each assigned only one target 12, the coloration makes the various torpedo spectra clearly distinguishable from one another.
  • the summation spectrogram calculated in successive time points is visualized in chronological succession on the screen 20 in a so-called waterfall representation, wherein the sum spectra calculated over a certain period of time at successive times are simultaneously visible on the screen 20.
  • the operator immediately recognizes, on the basis of this type of representation of the target noise spectra, whether optimum guidance of the torpedoes has been carried out or not.
  • FIG. 4 shows in simplified form a summation spectrogram of the four torpedo spectra at a specific point in time, with only the spectral lines of the fundamental frequencies of the torpedo spectra being shown for the sake of clarity.
  • the colors of all four torpedoes 11 are represented and belong to different frequencies. So the torpedo A (GREEN) is on a target with the fundamental frequency fi, the torpedo B (RED) is switched to a target with the frequency f 3 , the torpedo C (YELLOW) to a target with the fundamental frequency f 4 and the torpedo D (BLUE) to a target with the fundamental frequency f 5 .
  • GREEN GREEN
  • RED torpedo B
  • YELLOW torpedo C
  • BLUE torpedo D
  • each torpedo spectrum is correlated with itself and with the remaining torpedo spectra at block 19 "Correlation.”
  • the autocorrelation maxima and cross correlation maxima are determined and displayed on the screen in association with the respective torpedo 11 in the analysis image, such as this is schematized in Fig. 3.
  • the torpedo spectrum green
  • the autocorrelation function always giving the measure "1".
  • the autocorrelation maximum is shown in the analysis image of the torpedo A in the corresponding size in association with the target symbol in the color "green" at the bearing angle ⁇ Since these torpedo spectra do not match the torpedo spectra of torpedo A, the measure of the cross-correlation function will be close to "0", in any event being significantly less than the autocorrelation function of the torpedo spectrum of torpedo A.
  • This three cross-correlation maxima are in the analysis image of the torpedo A respectively with a size corresponding to their size each represented in the color on the bearing angle ⁇ , which corresponds to the color of each used for cross-correlation torpedo spectrum of the other torpedo.
  • the three cross-correlation functions are displayed in the size of the respectively determined correlation maximum in the colors "red”, “yellow” and "blue” on the symbol for the target "GREEN”.
  • the torpedo spectra of the torpedoes B, C and D are correlated with themselves and with the other torpedo spectra and the correlation maxima are displayed in the same way.
  • the cross-correlation of the torpedo spectrum of the torpedo B (ROT) with the torpedo spectrum of the torpedo C (YELLOW) results in a
  • Cross correlation function whose correlation maximum is only slightly smaller than "1", since the two torpedo spectra largely coincide
  • the cross correlation maximum is about the same size as the autocorrelation maximum and is shown in the analysis image of the torpedo B in the color of the torpedo C, ie "yellow".
  • YELLOW the torpedo spectrum of the torpedo C
  • RED the torpedo spectrum of the torpedo B
  • Cross correlation maximum which is close to "1" and thus in the analysis image of the torpedo C is shown in about the same size as the autocorrelation maximum of the torpedo spectrum of the torpedo C.
  • the cross correlation maximum is shown in the color "red" of the torpedo B.
  • the cross-correlation maxima of the cross-correlation function of the torpedo spectra of torpedoes C and B appear in the color "red.”
  • Fig. 4a in this constellation the assignment is missing of targets 12 and torpedoes 11 in the sum spectrogram spectral lines with the color "red” and “yellow”, and at a frequency f 4 occurs a spectral line with a mixed color here "orange” on.
  • the operator also recognizes in the summing spectrogram that the two torpedoes B (RED) and C (YELLOW) are assigned to the same target.
  • the symbol entered under this bearing angle is now converted from a circle into a quadrilateral and displayed in "RED.”
  • the sum spectrogram in FIG. 4a thus changes in the manner illustrated in FIG Summing Spectrogram illustrates that each torpedo 11 now has its own destination assigned to it, and the torpedo B and Torpedo C torpedo spectra cross-correlation function would give a cross-correlation maximum close to "0" because the target noise is no longer consistent.
  • the summation spectrogram shown in simplified form in FIG. 4b would correspond to a combat situation in which the target Z1 is the torpedo A, the target Z3 the torpedo B, the target Z4 the torpedo C and the target the torpedo D. Assigned to Z5. The goals Z2 and Z6 are not combated for lack of further torpedoes 11.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour guider une attaque par torpille lancée à partir d'une plate-forme, notamment d'un sous-marin, et comprenant une formation de plusieurs torpilles (11) portant chacune un sonar de torpille (13) et se dirigeant vers un groupe de cibles. Selon ce procédé, des bruits de cible reçus avec une sélectivité directionnelle par les sonars de torpilles (13) sont transmis à la centrale (15) et y sont représentés sous forme de spectres, et la centrale (15) affecte aux torpilles individuelles (11) des cibles à combattre. L'invention vise à fournir à l'opérateur une vue d'ensemble facile à visualiser et à suivre de l'état d'engagement concernant les cibles individuelles appréhendées par les torpilles (11), de façon qu'il puisse surveiller et corriger pour chaque torpille (11) l'affection de cible individuelle. A cet effet, pour l'affectation de cible, on sélectionne arbitrairement un bruit de cible parmi l'ensemble des bruits de cibles reçus avec une sélectivité directionnelle par le sonar de torpille (13) de la torpille (11), et on représente le spectre du bruit de cible sélectionné dans une couleur caractéristique de la torpille (11), sous forme de spectrogramme de torpille. Les spectres de torpilles de toutes les torpilles (11) sont représentés sur un spectrogramme commun qui est actualisé en permanence.
PCT/EP2009/051145 2008-02-07 2009-02-02 Procédé pour guider une attaque par torpille Ceased WO2009098180A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102008007851A DE102008007851B3 (de) 2008-02-07 2008-02-07 Verfahren zum Leiten eines Torpedoangriffs
DE102008007851.4 2008-02-07

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009098180A1 true WO2009098180A1 (fr) 2009-08-13

Family

ID=40348826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2009/051145 Ceased WO2009098180A1 (fr) 2008-02-07 2009-02-02 Procédé pour guider une attaque par torpille

Country Status (2)

Country Link
DE (1) DE102008007851B3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2009098180A1 (fr)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2550197A1 (de) * 1975-11-08 1978-12-14 Licentia Gmbh Verfahren zur dynamischen kreuzpeilung
EP0115044A2 (fr) * 1982-12-31 1984-08-08 Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Procédé de reconnaissance d'un situation tactique
EP0213541A2 (fr) * 1985-08-31 1987-03-11 Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Procédé pour détecter des bateaux
WO1999018451A1 (fr) * 1997-10-06 1999-04-15 ETAT FRANÇAIS représenté par le DELEGUE GENERAL POUR L'ARMEMENT Procede de representation sur un ecran de visualisation d'un champ de donnees multidirectionnelles notamment de donnees fournies par un sonar d'ecoute passive, et systeme pour la mise en oeuvre d'un tel procede
WO2001098796A2 (fr) * 2000-06-22 2001-12-27 Lockheed Martin Corporation Systeme de surveillance acoustique dote d'un affichage de donnnees de signature et de portee
FR2913115A1 (fr) * 2007-02-27 2008-08-29 Thales Sa Methode automatique de fusion de pistes et estimation de peignes d'harmoniques.

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2550197A1 (de) * 1975-11-08 1978-12-14 Licentia Gmbh Verfahren zur dynamischen kreuzpeilung
EP0115044A2 (fr) * 1982-12-31 1984-08-08 Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Procédé de reconnaissance d'un situation tactique
EP0213541A2 (fr) * 1985-08-31 1987-03-11 Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Procédé pour détecter des bateaux
WO1999018451A1 (fr) * 1997-10-06 1999-04-15 ETAT FRANÇAIS représenté par le DELEGUE GENERAL POUR L'ARMEMENT Procede de representation sur un ecran de visualisation d'un champ de donnees multidirectionnelles notamment de donnees fournies par un sonar d'ecoute passive, et systeme pour la mise en oeuvre d'un tel procede
WO2001098796A2 (fr) * 2000-06-22 2001-12-27 Lockheed Martin Corporation Systeme de surveillance acoustique dote d'un affichage de donnnees de signature et de portee
FR2913115A1 (fr) * 2007-02-27 2008-08-29 Thales Sa Methode automatique de fusion de pistes et estimation de peignes d'harmoniques.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102008007851B3 (de) 2009-03-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE2912587C1 (de) Feuerleiteinrichtung,insbesondere fuer ein mobiles Flugabwehrsystem
DE2952315A1 (de) Verfahren zur darstellung einer gefechtslage
EP3495762A1 (fr) Système et procédé de localisation de cible coordonnée par une personne d'un missile guidé
DE102008007851B3 (de) Verfahren zum Leiten eines Torpedoangriffs
EP2803938A2 (fr) Procédé de désignation de cible pour une rampe de lancement de missile
DE3248744C2 (fr)
DE3342338A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung fuer zielzuweisung und zielbekaempfung
DE102018110241A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Fahrzeugs vor einer Bedrohung
DE102018108204A1 (de) Interventionssystem zur Abwehr eines Schwarms von unbemannten Flugkörpern und Verfahren zur Abwehr eines Schwarms von unbemannten Flugkörpern mittels eines solchen Interventionssystems
CH670431A5 (fr)
DE2550197B2 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung des Standortes eines bewegten oder unbewegten Objektes und Einrichtung zu seiner Durchführung
DE102024000581B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Luftkampfsystems
Stockfisch The intellectual foundations of systems analysis
EP3339796A1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination de la trajectoire de vol de l'avion et procédé de détermination de la trajectoire de vol de l'avion
DE3818444A1 (de) Verfahren zur bedrohungsanalyse fuer ein heeresflugabwehrsystem
DE2932428A1 (de) Verfahren zur bekaempfung von bodenzielen durch gelenkte flugkoerper
EP1394495B1 (fr) Dispositif de combat contre cibles
DE977292C (de) Darstellung der Bahnen von Zielen und Geschossen in einem bewegten Koordinatensystem
Matthews The Political-Military Rivalry for Operational Control in US Military Actions: A Soldier's Perspective
DE3041076C1 (de) Verfahren zur Lenkung von mehreren Waffen auf einen Zielhaufen
DE3544401C1 (de) Verfahren zum Erzeugen eines Lagebildes von einer Seegefechtslage
DE3703952A1 (de) Bedien- und ueberwachungskonsole fuer einen panzer
DE102014018789A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bekämpfung von Militärfahrzeugen
DE102014014906B3 (de) Flugkörper und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Flugkörpers
Tucker Counterterrorism and the Perils of Preemption Problems of Command and Control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09708125

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09708125

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1