WO2009078745A1 - Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials - Google Patents
Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009078745A1 WO2009078745A1 PCT/RU2007/000708 RU2007000708W WO2009078745A1 WO 2009078745 A1 WO2009078745 A1 WO 2009078745A1 RU 2007000708 W RU2007000708 W RU 2007000708W WO 2009078745 A1 WO2009078745 A1 WO 2009078745A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- proppant
- capsule
- tackifying
- compound
- encapsulated
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims description 63
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 title abstract description 33
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 title abstract description 33
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 93
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- -1 poly(ε-caprolactone) Polymers 0.000 claims description 39
- 239000004952 Polyamide Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 229920002647 polyamide Polymers 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 claims description 18
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007777 multifunctional material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229920001661 Chitosan Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001710 Polyorthoester Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001308 poly(aminoacid) Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000747 poly(lactic acid) Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002745 poly(ortho ester) Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000058 polyacrylate Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001610 polycaprolactone Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004417 polycarbonate Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000515 polycarbonate Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920003169 water-soluble polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920006359 Fluoroplast Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycolic acid Polymers OCC(O)=O AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000954 Polyglycolide Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004642 Polyimide Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001328 Polyvinylidene chloride Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000001252 acrylic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001903 high density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004700 high-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001684 low density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004702 low-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000025 natural resin Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001721 polyimide Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000193 polymethacrylate Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000098 polyolefin Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 abstract description 25
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 34
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 27
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 description 27
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 20
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 15
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 11
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000011246 composite particle Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 5
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-Propenoic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=C NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229920001519 homopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- SMZOUWXMTYCWNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(2-methoxy-5-methylphenyl)ethanamine Chemical compound COC1=CC=C(C)C=C1CCN SMZOUWXMTYCWNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dichloromethane Chemical compound ClCCl YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 3
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methacrylic acid Chemical class CC(=C)C(O)=O CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 125000005396 acrylic acid ester group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001994 activation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006482 condensation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011872 intimate mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011236 particulate material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000768 polyamine Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000005956 quaternization reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000005060 rubber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013638 trimer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XYOMMVNZIAGSMW-UHFFFAOYSA-N (prop-2-enoylamino)methyl propane-1-sulfonate Chemical compound CCCS(=O)(=O)OCNC(=O)C=C XYOMMVNZIAGSMW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QNIRRHUUOQAEPB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(prop-2-enoylamino)butane-2-sulfonic acid Chemical class CCC(C)(S(O)(=O)=O)NC(=O)C=C QNIRRHUUOQAEPB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002101 Chitin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920003171 Poly (ethylene oxide) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002319 Poly(methyl acrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002732 Polyanhydride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000331 Polyhydroxybutyrate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004721 Polyphenylene oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001800 Shellac Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002125 Sokalan® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011149 active material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005054 agglomeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003232 aliphatic polyester Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 150000008064 anhydrides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- KCXMKQUNVWSEMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzyl chloride Chemical compound ClCC1=CC=CC=C1 KCXMKQUNVWSEMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940073608 benzyl chloride Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011258 core-shell material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006037 cross link polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010779 crude oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001351 cycling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000014113 dietary fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- DENRZWYUOJLTMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethyl sulfate Chemical compound CCOS(=O)(=O)OCC DENRZWYUOJLTMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940008406 diethyl sulfate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- VAYGXNSJCAHWJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N dimethyl sulfate Chemical compound COS(=O)(=O)OC VAYGXNSJCAHWJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001651 emery Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002118 epoxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930195729 fatty acid Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000004665 fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009969 flowable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000002485 formyl group Chemical class [H]C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004820 halides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910000856 hastalloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002373 hemiacetals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003301 hydrolyzing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- FPYJFEHAWHCUMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N maleic anhydride Chemical compound O=C1OC(=O)C=C1 FPYJFEHAWHCUMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000005397 methacrylic acid ester group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000010445 mica Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052618 mica group Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004005 microsphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012764 mineral filler Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000001181 organosilyl group Chemical group [SiH3]* 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001603 poly (alkyl acrylates) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001485 poly(butyl acrylate) polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001490 poly(butyl methacrylate) polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005015 poly(hydroxybutyrate) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940065514 poly(lactide) Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229920003229 poly(methyl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002627 poly(phosphazenes) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920006149 polyester-amide block copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000570 polyether Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013074 reference sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012508 resin bead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000518 rheometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004208 shellac Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZLGIYFNHBLSMPS-ATJNOEHPSA-N shellac Chemical compound OCCCCCC(O)C(O)CCCCCCCC(O)=O.C1C23[C@H](C(O)=O)CCC2[C@](C)(CO)[C@@H]1C(C(O)=O)=C[C@@H]3O ZLGIYFNHBLSMPS-ATJNOEHPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940113147 shellac Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000013874 shellac Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010455 vermiculite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052902 vermiculite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019354 vermiculite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
- C09K8/62—Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
- C09K8/70—Compositions for forming crevices or fractures characterised by their form or by the form of their components, e.g. foams
- C09K8/706—Encapsulated breakers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
- C09K8/80—Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
- C09K8/805—Coated proppants
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
- C09K8/92—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation characterised by their form or by the form of their components, e.g. encapsulated material
Definitions
- the present Invention relates generally to the field of petroleum production. More specifically, the present Invention relates to a method for stimulation of reservoirs for fluid production.
- proppant is pumped into a fracture created by hydraulic fracturing in the near-wellbore zone.
- Wide application of this approach is often hindered by proppant flowback, that is, a process of proppant removal from the proppant pack into the well bore.
- Proppant can be removed as both intact particles and/or as particle debris generated due to proppant crush.
- up to about 20% of the pumped proppant is usually removed from a fracture during fracture cleanup and fluid production.
- Proppant flowback is a serious problem occurring during completion and production.
- proppant flowback is a change in the fracture geometry.
- the fracture sections from which proppant is removed may become narrower. This may lead to reduction of the fracture conductivity, which in turn causes decreases in fluid production.
- Another problem that can be caused by high proppant flowback is a failure of downhole equipment, such as electrical submersible pumps (ESP 's).
- Proppant crush is also an important problem.
- the closure pressure leads to partial proppant fragmentation, causing fines generation.
- Packs of polydispersed granular material are characterized by low porosity and conductivity. Proppant debris removed from a fracture may significantly contribute to ESP erosion as well. Elimination of the proppant flowback leads to both a significant increase in proppant pack conductivity and an increase in ESP lifetime.
- proppant material having a hardenable resin coating see, for example, US3492147, US3929191, US5218038, and US5639806, which is pumped into the fracture at the end of the fracturing treatment.
- this type of proppant has serious limitations caused by unwanted chemical reactions of the resin with the fracturing fluid. Firstly, these reactions induce partial degradation of the coating and reduce the strength of binding between proppant particles. This process results in proppant pack loosening. Secondly, degradation components of the coating cause an unpredictable change in the rheology of the fracturing fluid.
- a second method of reducing proppant flowback is certain uses of "tackifying compounds".
- the "tackifying compound” is a liquid compound, or a solution of such a compound, capable of forming at least a partial coating upon the substrate material (proppant) with which it is mixed prior to or subsequent to placement in the subterranean formation.
- Compounds suitable for use as a tackifying compound include almost any compound that, when in liquid form or in a solvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating by themselves.
- the words “material” or “agent” may be used interchangeably here with “compound”.
- a liquid form or solution of a tackifying compound has been incorporated into an intimate mixture with a particulate material such as conventional proppants or gravel packing materials and introduced into subterranean formations.
- a particulate material such as conventional proppants or gravel packing materials
- proppant it is to be understood that both proppant and gravel are meant; proppants and gravels are included in "particulates”.
- the liquid or solution of tackifying compound interacts mechanically with the particles of particulate introduced into the subterranean formation and the adhered fines to limit or prevent the flowback of fines to the wellbore.
- a tackifying compound has been incorporated in an intimate mixture with a particulate material such as conventional proppants or gravel packing materials together with a hardenable resin.
- a particulate material such as conventional proppants or gravel packing materials together with a hardenable resin.
- Deposition of proppants coated with the tackifying compound and resin material causes particulate adjacent to the coated material to adhere to the coated material, thereby creating proppant agglomerates which bridge against other particles in the formation to minimize initial particulate flowback, and the hardenable resin subsequently consolidates the particulate before and during flowback.
- the technical result of the present Invention is the development of (a) a new material for more efficient hydraulic fracturing of subterranean formations and for control of proppant flowback during fluid production, and (b) a method of using this material.
- This new material is nonsoluble capsules with a tackifying agent inside.
- This material provides no adhesion as prepared, unlike the tackifying additives known previously
- the adhesion is activated in situ and this activation process may be enhanced by use of a pressure pulse generator.
- compositions and methods of the Invention include the following. 1)
- the proppant-laden fracturing fluid is injected without the negative effects of having adhesive materials in the wellbore. This avoids proppant agglomeration during treating and reduces the probability of perforation plugging during hydraulic fracturing. This also reduces proppant sedimentation during treatment and fracture closure.
- the protective shells prevent chemical reaction between the tackifying agent and the fracturing fluid. This avoids damage to the fracturing fluid and preserves the high adhesion activity of the encapsulated agent.
- composition and method reduces the consumption of tackifying agent (and so reduces the total amount of tackifying agent needed).
- a method of treating a subterranean formation includes several stages.
- a fracture is propped with a conventional proppant mixed with an encapsulated tackifying (adhesive) compound.
- the amount of encapsulated tackifying compound preferably varies from about 0.01 to about 20 weight per cent relative to the proppant.
- An encapsulated adhesive compound and proppant may be pre-mixed or a mixture may be prepared on the fly at the well site and than introduced into the subterranean formation.
- a second stage includes fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound.
- a pressure pulse generator is employed for intensifying the adhesive compound release and for uniform dispersion in the inter-pore medium.
- the adhesive compound forms a non- hardening coating on the proppant and reinforces the proppant pack in the fracture.
- New encapsulated adhesive compounds are also given; these and the method of treating of subterranean formations lead to reduced proppant flowback and to maintaining the initial conductivity of the proppant pack.
- a composition of the Invention is a capsule consisting of at least a protective shell containing a tackifying compound.
- the tackifying compound may be a material selected, for example, from at least one of polyamides; quaternized polyamides; polyesters; polycarbonates; polycarbamates; natural resins; acrylates; silylated polyamides; and mixtures of these compounds.
- the tackifying compound may be non-hardening.
- the capsule size may range from about 3.36 mm (about 6 mesh) to about 0.25 mm (about 60 mesh), and the protective shell may have a thickness in the range of about 0.01 to about 1 mm.
- the protective shell may be formed from a water-soluble polymer selected, for example, from at least one of a polysaccharide; a polylactide; a polyglycolide; a polyorthoester; a polyaminoacid, a polyactoacid, a polyglycolacid, a polyacrylamide, poly( ⁇ -caprolactone); a chitosan; and mixtures of these polymers.
- the protective shell may also be formed from an oil-soluble polymer, selected, for example, from at least one of a polyester; a polyolefins; a low density polyethylene; a high density polyethylene; a polypropylene; and mixtures of these materials.
- the protective shell may also be formed from an insoluble polymer compound selected, for example, from at least one of polyesters; polyacrylates; polyimides; phenol-aldehyde resins; fluoroplasts; polymethacrylates; polyvinylidene chlorides; polyvinylchlorides; and mixtures of these materials.
- an insoluble polymer compound selected, for example, from at least one of polyesters; polyacrylates; polyimides; phenol-aldehyde resins; fluoroplasts; polymethacrylates; polyvinylidene chlorides; polyvinylchlorides; and mixtures of these materials.
- the capsule may also contain at least one of a deformable material; a surfactant; a multifunctional material; a degradable material; a filler material; an inert filler material; and mixtures of these materials.
- composition and method of the Invention may be used in fracturing, gravel packing, and combined fracturing and gravel packing in a single operation ("frac and pack”, “frac-pack”, “frac-n-pack”, stimpack, etc.).
- the method of proppant flowback control and permeability retention uses new encapsulated tackifying (adhesive) compounds.
- One method of well treatment includes the steps of: a) injection of a slurry including a proppant material and an encapsulated adhesive compound; and b) allowing fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound into the proppant pack.
- the method of well treatment includes the steps of: a) injection of a slurry including a proppant material and an encapsulated adhesive compound; b) allowing fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound into the proppant matrix; and c) employing a pressure pulse generator to intensify the adhesive compound release and to affect more uniform dispersion of the adhesive compound into the inter-pore medium.
- the encapsulated adhesive compound (capsules or microspheres) has a "core-shell” structure: a non-hardening adhesive compound ("core") encapsulated in an impermeable coating (“shell”).
- the chemical composition of the protecting shell is one or more of a water or oil-soluble polymeric material, a degradable compound, or a cross-linked polymer.
- the tackifying substance is a liquid, or a solution of a liquid compound or a solution of a solid compound that transforms into the liquid state at the subterranean formation temperature.
- a particularly preferred group of tackifying compounds is those polyamides that are liquids at the temperature of the subterranean formation to be treated, or that are in solvent solution, and that are, by themselves, non- hardening when present on the proppant introduced into the subterranean formation.
- a particularly preferred material is a condensation reaction product made from (a) and (b) polyamines.
- Such commercially available polyacids include mixtures of C 36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higher oligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids.
- Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acids produced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like.
- Such acid compounds are available from companies such as Witco Corporation (Chemtura Corp,. Greenwich, CT, U. S. A.), Union Camp Corporation (International Paper, Memphis, TN, U. S. A), Chemtall (Riceboro, GA, U. S. A.), and Emery Industries (Cincinnati, OH, U.
- the polyamides thus made may be converted to quaternary compounds by reaction with methylene chloride, dimethyl sulfate, benzyl chloride, diethyl sulfate, and the like.
- the quaternization reaction may be employed to improve the chemical compatibility of the tackifying compound with the other chemicals utilized in the treatment fluids. Quaternization of the tackifying compound may reduce such effects as breaking of fracturing fluids.
- Additional compounds that may be utilized as tackifying compounds include liquid forms or solutions of, for example, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, natural resins such as shellac, and the like.
- compositions suitable for use as tackifying agents in the present Invention comprise any compound that may form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate. Additional examples of suitable tackifying agents include non-aqueous tackifying agents, aqueous tackifying agents, and silyl modified polyamides.
- Non-aqueous tackifying agents generally comprise polyamides (condensation reaction product of a polyacid and a polyamine) that are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterranean formation, and are, by themselves, non-hardening.
- Non-aqueous tackifying agents may be combined with multifunctional materials capable of reacting with the tackifying compounds to form hardened coatings.
- a "hardened coating” as used herein means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with the multifunctional material results in a substantially non-flowable reaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in a consolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with the particulates (for example proppant).
- aqueous tackifying agents are defined as those tackifying materials that are soluble in aqueous fluids. Aqueous tackifying agents are capable of forming a partial coating upon the surface of proppants. Aqueous tackifying agents are not significantly tacky when placed onto a particulate, but are capable of being “activated” by an activating agent (or compound or material) to transform the compound into a sticky, tackifying compound at a desirable time. Such activating agents are well-known in the art.
- Suitable aqueous tackifying compounds include derivatives of acrylic acid polymers, for example, acrylic acid ester polymers, acrylic acid derivative polymers, acrylic acid homopolymers, acrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl acrylate), poly(butyl acrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate)), acrylic acid ester co-polymers, methacrylic acid derivative polymers, methacrylic acid homopolymers, methacrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and poly(2- ethylhexyl methacrylate)), acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate derivative polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and acrylic acid/acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-pol
- Silyl-modified polyamide compounds suitable for use as tackifying agents are substantially self-hardening compositions.
- Substantially self- hardening or self-cross-linking compositions such as the silyl-modified polyamide compounds disclosed in US6439309, may also be used as the tackifying compounds of the present Invention.
- Silyl-modified polyamides may be based, for example, on the reaction product of a silylating agent with a polyamide or a mixture of polyamides.
- these silyl-modified polyamide compounds When these silyl-modified polyamide compounds are introduced in the unhardened state into a subterranean formation, these compounds are capable of at least partially adhering to naturally-occurring particulates or proppant and then are further capable of self-hardening into a substantially non-tacky state without the need for the presence of separate hardening components or reactive components.
- additive of certain surfactants may improve or facilitate the coating of the tackifying compound upon the particulate.
- the particle containing a tackifying compound may also contain a multifunctional material, such as those described in US6047772.
- the multifunctional material reacts with the tackifying compound on the proppant to consolidate at least a portion of the proppant within the formation.
- Preferred multifunctional materials include at least one of aldehydes, dialdehydes, diacid halides, dihalides, polyacid anhydrides, epoxides and hemiacetals.
- compositions and methods of the present Invention may also be used in conjunction with deformable particles, such as those described in US6742590, EP 1398460, and MX 03008020.
- deformable particles or solid materials of a larger size than the proppant particles are added and uniformly suspended in the fracturing fluid along with the proppant particles and encapsulated tackifying compound so that the smaller proppant particles stick to the larger deformable particles.
- the preferred deformable particle or solid material is glass, ceramic, rubber, silicon, plastic, polymer, resin or metal, in the shape of fibers, shavings, platelets, and irregular shaped pieces.
- the deformable particles are preferably formed of rubber-coated proppant, resin beads, soft metal particulates, resin coated metal particulates and the like.
- the methods and compositions of the Invention may also be used with a degradable material, such as those described in US20040261995 and WO2005000993, capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole.
- a degradable material such as those described in US20040261995 and WO2005000993, capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole.
- irreversible means that the degradable material, once degraded downhole, should not recrystallize or reconsolidate while downhole.
- degradation or “degradable” refer to both of the two relatively extreme cases of hydrolytic degradation that the degradable material may undergo, i.e., heterogeneous (or bulk erosion) and homogeneous (or surface erosion), and any stage of degradation in between these two. This degradation can be a result of a chemical or thermal reaction.
- the proppant, encapsulated tackifying material, and degradable material may be pre-blended or may be mixed on-the-fly at the well site.
- the weight concentration of the degradable material in the total composition preferably ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%. A concentration of degradable material between about 1% and about 5% by weight is most preferable.
- the degradable material is selected to have a size, and shape similar to the size and shape of the curable proppant particulates to help maintain substantial uniformity within the mixture. It is preferable if the proppant particulates and the degradable material do not segregate within the proppant composition.
- the degradable materials may have any shape, depending on the desired characteristics of the resultant voids in the proppant matrix including but not limited to particles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other physical shape.
- Mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent may also include composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material, for example as disclosed in U. S. Patent Applications US20050126780, and US20050130848.
- Such composite particles generally are more resistant to crushing forces within a fracture (as compared to degradable materials by themselves) and may help support the fracture and maintain the integrity of the proppant matrix.
- voids that have a desirable degree of integrity are formed, at least in part due to the high crush strength of the composite particles and the consolidation of the proppant matrix. Such vo ⁇ ds increase the proppant pack permeability.
- Suitable composite particles include one or more than one of a polysaccharide; a chitin; a chitosan; a protein; an aliphatic polyester; a poly(lactide); a poly(glycolide); a poly( ⁇ -caprolactone); a poly(hydroxy ester ether); a poly(hydroxybutyrate); a polyanhydride; a polycarbonate; a poly(orthoester); a poly(acetal); a poly(acrylate); a poly(alkylacrylate); a poly(amino acid); a poly(ethylene oxide); a poly ether ester; a polyester amide; a polyamide; a polyphosphazene; and copolymers and blends of such materials.
- Inert fillers may also be included in mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent.
- Suitable inert fillers are materials that enhance the compressive strength of a proppant pack.
- Suitable fillers include calcium carbonate, talc, mica, glass, silica, silica flour, other similar mineral fillers, and mixtures of such materials.
- the concentration of composite particles and/or fillers in the mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent composition preferably range from about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of the total.
- any portion of the proppant particulates may be coated with a curable resin.
- a tackifying agent may be used rather than a curable resin. The tackifying agent helps distribute the degradable material within the proppant composition and keep it in place within the proppant matrix.
- Suitable coating (encapsulating) materials include a water-soluble polymer taken from the classes of a polysaccharide; a polylactide; a polyglycolide; a polyorthoester; a polyaminoacid; a polylactoacid; a polyglycolacid; a polyacrylamide; a poly( ⁇ -caprolactone); a chitosan; or a mixture of such materials.
- suitable materials for the shells of encapsulated tackifying compounds include oil-soluble substances such as polyesters, polyolefins, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene.
- the shell may also be made from an insoluble polymer compound selected from the polyesters, polyacrylates, polyimides, phenol-aldehyde resins and mixtures of such materials.
- the shell may also be made from fluoroplasts, polymethacrylates, polyvinylidene chlorides, polyvinylchlorides, and mixtures of such materials.
- Suitable shell thicknesses of capsules are in the range of from about 0.01 mm to about 1 mm.
- Suitable sizes of capsules containing adhesive compounds range from about 3.36 mm (about 6 mesh) to about 0.25 mm (about 60 mesh).
- the encapsulated adhesive compound and proppant may be pre-mixed on or off location or may be mixed on the fly at the well site and than introduced into a subterranean formation.
- the blend preferably includes an amount of an encapsulated adhesive compound of between about 0.01% and about 20% by weight of proppant. Most preferably, the blend contains the tackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.05 to about 3.0 percent active material by weight of proppant. It is to be understood that larger quantities may be used; however, the larger quantities generally do not significantly increase performance and could undesirably reduce the permeability of the particulate pack.
- the mechanism of the adhesive compound release may be one or more than one of shell breakage due to crushing, dissolution of the shell in the fracturing fluid or in subterranean water or crude oil, or diffusion of fluid into the capsule causing breakage, or diffusion of the tackifying compound out of the capsule.
- the adhesive compound (tackifying agent) is then dispersed in the inter-pore medium in the proppant in the fracture.
- the shell may be partially destroyed during a fracture treatment at high pressure due to multiple collisions with proppant particles in the flow of the slurry.
- Shell thickness may influence a hydrostatic (diffusion) release mechanism.
- Aqueous or oil soluble polymer coatings may be employed. Breakage of the capsule shells during the fracture closure is the major mechanism providing release of the adhesive compound. For efficient capsule breakage, capsule size should be larger than the pore sizes of the proppant pack.
- the adhesive compound should be dispersed in the porous medium. If there is insufficient fluid motion relative to the particles, then the principle mechanism of dispersion is molecular diffusion, which is very slow.
- the dispersion problem may be solved as follows. Pressure pulse generators provide high-frequency pressure pulses, causing fluid medium oscillations, the amplitudes of which are comparable to the proppant pack pore size. Micro-vortexes arising in the inter-pore medium provide efficient dispersion.
- Any known pressure pulse generator may be employed; examples include cavitation generators, electro-hydraulic generators, ultrasonic generators, hydrodynamic generators, inducing water hammers at the end of the treatment, etc.
- An optimal depth of treatment by a pressure pulse generator is 5-10 meters.
- An additional manner of using the methods and compositions of the present Invention is to use proppant mixed with encapsulated tackifying material in the far wellbore area of the fracture and then place an agent capable of controlling particulate flowback in the near wellbore area.
- the agent capable of controlling particulate flowback may be proppant coated with curable resin, may be fibers, or may be a screen sized to control the flowback of the proppant.
- Placing proppant mixed with encapsulated tackifying material in the far wellbore area acts to help control the migration of formation sands and fines. Placing proppant coated with curable resin and/or fibers in the fracture near the well bore, or placing a screen in the well bore, acts to keep the proppant in place instead of producing it along with the produced fluids.
- One of the major advantages of the introduction of encapsulated adhesive compounds is the ability to pump a proppant slurry containing only particles that do not have tacky properties. Thus the particles do not agglomerate.
- the method and composition of the present Invention provides: (i) reduction in the probability of a screen-out, and (ii) lower proppant settling velocity during pumping and fracture closing.
- the Invention increases proppant pack strength even if closure stress cycling is employed, and encapsulated adhesive compounds do not require any shut-in time for activation.
- tackifying compounds may be used both to control fines migration and to control corrosion of ferrous metals.
- suitable polyamide materials form a very thin film on the ferrous metal surfaces, protecting them from contact with aqueous fluids.
- Encapsulated adhesive compounds are most effective if a forced closure procedure is applied.
- the compositions and methods of the Invention may also be used for reduction of coal fines production from subterranean coal formations, including subterranean formations penetrated by gravel packed wellbores.
- the compositions and methods of the Invention may be used with treatment chemicals such as inhibitors, biocides, breakers, buffers, paraffin inhibitor and corrosion inhibitors.
- the compositions and methods of the Invention may be used when at least a portion of the proppant is resin-coated, resulting in tackified resin coated proppant.
- Suitable proppant materials include any proppant or gravel used in the industry, for example ceramic particulate, sand of different shapes, proppant or sand with cured resin coating, expanded haydite, vermiculite, agloporite, or proppants with curable resin coating, and mixtures of such materials.
- the Invention may be used in wells of any orientation, in open or cased holes, and with or without screens.
- the Invention may be used for wells for production, injection, or storage of any fluids, such as water, hydrocarbons or carbon dioxide.
- This device included a gravitation filter with a multicell assembly for sampling.
- the entire system was automated. Data acquisition and processing were computer-controlled.
- the apparatus provided data on the proppant pack strength through a gradual increase in the water flow rate when the critical pack-destruction rate was reached.
- the proppant used was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand and the encapsulated tackifying compound was used at a concentration of 1 weight per cent of the proppant.
- the particulate was mixed with the fracture fluid.
- the size of the capsules of tackifying compound was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh), and the shell thickness was about 50 microns.
- the reference sample was pure 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand. The sample was loaded between two Ohio sandstone slabs in the apparatus for testing of the proppant pack strength.
- a standard procedure was used: a 20.6 MPa closure pressure was applied to the cell, then the cell was heated up to 95 0 C and kept at this temperature for 2 hours at a constant water flow rate of 50 ml/min until complete degradation of the fracture fluid had occurred.
- the pack strength testing was carried out with a stream of hot water (95°C) containing 2% KCl. The solution flow rate was increased gradually until complete destruction of the pack had occurred. Pack destruction was indicated by a drastic pressure drop (as shown by readings from differential pressure gauges) and by visual observation of the proppant particulate on the gravitation filters. Measurements demonstrated a 19-fold increase in the strength of the pack from sand initial mixed with encapsulated tackifying agent in comparison to the reference case of pure proppant.
- the proppant used was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand and the encapsulated tackifying compound was used at a concentration of 1 weight per cent of the proppant.
- the particulate was mixed with the fracture fluid.
- the size of the capsules of tackifying compound was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh), and the shell thickness was about 50 microns.
- the same apparatus as example 1 was used.
- the sample was loaded between two Ohio sandstone slabs in the apparatus for testing of the proppant pack strength.
- the proppant bed contained the operating element of an ultrasound piezoelectric generator. This element was a metal cylinder having a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 10 mm. This cell was compressed with a closure pressure of 20.6 MPa.
- the cell was heated up to 95 0 C and kept at this temperature for 2 hours at a constant water flow rate of 50 ml/min until complete degradation of the fracture fluid had occurred.
- the tackifying agent was further activated with ultrasound emissions of the piezoelectric generator (frequency of 10-15 kHz; power of 20W) for 10 minutes.
- the pack strength testing was carried out with a stream of hot water (95 0 C) containing 2% KCl. The solution flow rate was increased gradually until complete destruction of the pack had occurred. Pack destruction was indicated by a drastic pressure drop (as shown by readings from differential pressure gauges) and by visual observation of the proppant particulate on the gravitation filters. Measurements demonstrated a 48-fold increase in the strength of the pack initially mixed with encapsulated tackifying agent and further treated with pressure pulses (ultrasound) in comparison to a reference case of pure proppant.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Adhesives Or Adhesive Processes (AREA)
Abstract
The present Invention relates generally to the field of petroleum production. More specifically, the present Invention relates to a method for stimulation of reservoirs for fluid production. A method of treating a subterranean formation includes the initial stage, wherein a fracture is propped with a conventional proppant mixed with an encapsulated tackifying (adhesive) compound. The amount of encapsulated tackifying compound preferably varies from about 0.01 to about 20 weight per cent relative to the proppant. An encapsulated adhesive compound and proppant may be pre-mixed or a mixture may be prepared on the fly at the well site and than introduced into the subterranean formation. A second stage includes fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound.
Description
PROPPANT FLOWBACK CONTROL USING ENCAPSULATED
ADHESIVE MATERIALS
The present Invention relates generally to the field of petroleum production. More specifically, the present Invention relates to a method for stimulation of reservoirs for fluid production.
In one common stimulation technique, proppant is pumped into a fracture created by hydraulic fracturing in the near-wellbore zone. Wide application of this approach is often hindered by proppant flowback, that is, a process of proppant removal from the proppant pack into the well bore. Proppant can be removed as both intact particles and/or as particle debris generated due to proppant crush. Experience shows that up to about 20% of the pumped proppant is usually removed from a fracture during fracture cleanup and fluid production. Proppant flowback is a serious problem occurring during completion and production.
One of the major problems caused by proppant flowback is a change in the fracture geometry. The fracture sections from which proppant is removed may become narrower. This may lead to reduction of the fracture conductivity, which in turn causes decreases in fluid production. Another problem that can be caused by high proppant flowback is a failure of downhole equipment, such as electrical submersible pumps (ESP 's). Proppant crush is also an important problem. The closure pressure leads to partial proppant fragmentation, causing fines generation. Packs of polydispersed granular material are characterized by low porosity and conductivity. Proppant debris removed from a fracture may significantly
contribute to ESP erosion as well. Elimination of the proppant flowback leads to both a significant increase in proppant pack conductivity and an increase in ESP lifetime.
There are many known methods for reducing proppant flowback.
The most widely accepted method is the use of proppant material having a hardenable resin coating (see, for example, US3492147, US3929191, US5218038, and US5639806) which is pumped into the fracture at the end of the fracturing treatment. However, the use of this type of proppant has serious limitations caused by unwanted chemical reactions of the resin with the fracturing fluid. Firstly, these reactions induce partial degradation of the coating and reduce the strength of binding between proppant particles. This process results in proppant pack loosening. Secondly, degradation components of the coating cause an unpredictable change in the rheology of the fracturing fluid.
A second method of reducing proppant flowback is certain uses of "tackifying compounds". The "tackifying compound" is a liquid compound, or a solution of such a compound, capable of forming at least a partial coating upon the substrate material (proppant) with which it is mixed prior to or subsequent to placement in the subterranean formation. Compounds suitable for use as a tackifying compound include almost any compound that, when in liquid form or in a solvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating by themselves. The words "material" or "agent" may be used interchangeably here with "compound".
A liquid form or solution of a tackifying compound has been incorporated into an intimate mixture with a particulate material such as
conventional proppants or gravel packing materials and introduced into subterranean formations. (When the word proppant is used, it is to be understood that both proppant and gravel are meant; proppants and gravels are included in "particulates".) The liquid or solution of tackifying compound interacts mechanically with the particles of particulate introduced into the subterranean formation and the adhered fines to limit or prevent the flowback of fines to the wellbore.
In another method, a tackifying compound has been incorporated in an intimate mixture with a particulate material such as conventional proppants or gravel packing materials together with a hardenable resin. Deposition of proppants coated with the tackifying compound and resin material causes particulate adjacent to the coated material to adhere to the coated material, thereby creating proppant agglomerates which bridge against other particles in the formation to minimize initial particulate flowback, and the hardenable resin subsequently consolidates the particulate before and during flowback.
The technical result of the present Invention is the development of (a) a new material for more efficient hydraulic fracturing of subterranean formations and for control of proppant flowback during fluid production, and (b) a method of using this material. This new material is nonsoluble capsules with a tackifying agent inside. This material provides no adhesion as prepared, unlike the tackifying additives known previously The adhesion is activated in situ and this activation process may be enhanced by use of a pressure pulse generator.
The advantages of the compositions and methods of the Invention include the following.
1) The proppant-laden fracturing fluid is injected without the negative effects of having adhesive materials in the wellbore. This avoids proppant agglomeration during treating and reduces the probability of perforation plugging during hydraulic fracturing. This also reduces proppant sedimentation during treatment and fracture closure.
2) The protective shells prevent chemical reaction between the tackifying agent and the fracturing fluid. This avoids damage to the fracturing fluid and preserves the high adhesion activity of the encapsulated agent.
3) The capsules make delivery of the tackifying agent to the fracture much simpler; conventional equipment for proppant handling and mixing may be used.
4) The composition and method reduces the consumption of tackifying agent (and so reduces the total amount of tackifying agent needed).
Summary of the Invention
A method of treating a subterranean formation is given. According to the Invention, the method includes several stages. In the initial stage, a fracture is propped with a conventional proppant mixed with an encapsulated tackifying (adhesive) compound. The amount of encapsulated tackifying compound preferably varies from about 0.01 to about 20 weight per cent relative to the proppant. An encapsulated adhesive compound and proppant may be pre-mixed or a mixture may be prepared on the fly at the well site and than introduced into the subterranean formation. A second stage
includes fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound.
In an optional final stage, a pressure pulse generator is employed for intensifying the adhesive compound release and for uniform dispersion in the inter-pore medium. As a result, the adhesive compound forms a non- hardening coating on the proppant and reinforces the proppant pack in the fracture. New encapsulated adhesive compounds are also given; these and the method of treating of subterranean formations lead to reduced proppant flowback and to maintaining the initial conductivity of the proppant pack.
A composition of the Invention is a capsule consisting of at least a protective shell containing a tackifying compound. The tackifying compound may be a material selected, for example, from at least one of polyamides; quaternized polyamides; polyesters; polycarbonates; polycarbamates; natural resins; acrylates; silylated polyamides; and mixtures of these compounds. The tackifying compound may be non-hardening. The capsule size may range from about 3.36 mm (about 6 mesh) to about 0.25 mm (about 60 mesh), and the protective shell may have a thickness in the range of about 0.01 to about 1 mm.
The protective shell may be formed from a water-soluble polymer selected, for example, from at least one of a polysaccharide; a polylactide; a polyglycolide; a polyorthoester; a polyaminoacid, a polyactoacid, a polyglycolacid, a polyacrylamide, poly(ε-caprolactone); a chitosan; and mixtures of these polymers. The protective shell may also be formed from an oil-soluble polymer, selected, for example, from at least one of a polyester; a polyolefins; a low density polyethylene; a high density
polyethylene; a polypropylene; and mixtures of these materials. The protective shell may also be formed from an insoluble polymer compound selected, for example, from at least one of polyesters; polyacrylates; polyimides; phenol-aldehyde resins; fluoroplasts; polymethacrylates; polyvinylidene chlorides; polyvinylchlorides; and mixtures of these materials.
The capsule may also contain at least one of a deformable material; a surfactant; a multifunctional material; a degradable material; a filler material; an inert filler material; and mixtures of these materials.
Detailed Description of the Invention
It should be understood that throughout this specification, when a concentration or amount or other parameter range is described as being useful, or suitable, or the like, it is intended that any and every concentration or amount or other parameter within the range, including the end points, is to be considered as having been stated. Furthermore, each numerical value should be read once as modified by the term "about" (unless already expressly so modified) and then read again as not to be so modified unless otherwise stated in context. For example, "a range of from 1 to 10" is to be read as indicating each and every possible number along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. In other words, when a certain range is expressed, even if only a few specific data points are explicitly identified or referred to within the range, or even when no data points are referred to within the range, it is to be understood that the inventors appreciate and understand that any and all data points within the range are to be considered
to have been specified, and that the inventors have possession of the entire range and all points within the range.
Although the following discussion emphasizes fracturing, the composition and method of the Invention may be used in fracturing, gravel packing, and combined fracturing and gravel packing in a single operation ("frac and pack", "frac-pack", "frac-n-pack", stimpack, etc.).
The method of proppant flowback control and permeability retention uses new encapsulated tackifying (adhesive) compounds. One method of well treatment includes the steps of: a) injection of a slurry including a proppant material and an encapsulated adhesive compound; and b) allowing fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound into the proppant pack.
In another embodiment, the method of well treatment includes the steps of: a) injection of a slurry including a proppant material and an encapsulated adhesive compound; b) allowing fracture closure that leads to capsule breakage and release of the adhesive compound into the proppant matrix; and c) employing a pressure pulse generator to intensify the adhesive compound release and to affect more uniform dispersion of the adhesive compound into the inter-pore medium.
The encapsulated adhesive compound (capsules or microspheres) has a "core-shell" structure: a non-hardening adhesive compound ("core") encapsulated in an impermeable coating ("shell"). The chemical
composition of the protecting shell is one or more of a water or oil-soluble polymeric material, a degradable compound, or a cross-linked polymer.
The tackifying substance is a liquid, or a solution of a liquid compound or a solution of a solid compound that transforms into the liquid state at the subterranean formation temperature.
A particularly preferred group of tackifying compounds is those polyamides that are liquids at the temperature of the subterranean formation to be treated, or that are in solvent solution, and that are, by themselves, non- hardening when present on the proppant introduced into the subterranean formation. A particularly preferred material is a condensation reaction product made from (a) and (b) polyamines. Such commercially available polyacids include mixtures of C36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higher oligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids. Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acids produced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like. Such acid compounds are available from companies such as Witco Corporation (Chemtura Corp,. Greenwich, CT, U. S. A.), Union Camp Corporation (International Paper, Memphis, TN, U. S. A), Chemtall (Riceboro, GA, U. S. A.), and Emery Industries (Cincinnati, OH, U. S. A.).
The polyamides thus made may be converted to quaternary compounds by reaction with methylene chloride, dimethyl sulfate, benzyl chloride, diethyl sulfate, and the like. The quaternization reaction may be employed to improve the chemical compatibility of the tackifying compound with the other chemicals utilized in the treatment fluids. Quaternization of
the tackifying compound may reduce such effects as breaking of fracturing fluids.
Additional compounds that may be utilized as tackifying compounds include liquid forms or solutions of, for example, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, natural resins such as shellac, and the like.
Compositions suitable for use as tackifying agents in the present Invention comprise any compound that may form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate. Additional examples of suitable tackifying agents include non-aqueous tackifying agents, aqueous tackifying agents, and silyl modified polyamides.
Non-aqueous tackifying agents generally comprise polyamides (condensation reaction product of a polyacid and a polyamine) that are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterranean formation, and are, by themselves, non-hardening.
Non-aqueous tackifying agents may be combined with multifunctional materials capable of reacting with the tackifying compounds to form hardened coatings. A "hardened coating" as used herein means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with the multifunctional material results in a substantially non-flowable reaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in a consolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with the particulates (for example proppant).
The "aqueous tackifying agents" are defined as those tackifying materials that are soluble in aqueous fluids. Aqueous tackifying agents are capable of forming a partial coating upon the surface of proppants. Aqueous tackifying agents are not significantly tacky when placed onto a particulate,
but are capable of being "activated" by an activating agent (or compound or material) to transform the compound into a sticky, tackifying compound at a desirable time. Such activating agents are well-known in the art.
Suitable aqueous tackifying compounds include derivatives of acrylic acid polymers, for example, acrylic acid ester polymers, acrylic acid derivative polymers, acrylic acid homopolymers, acrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl acrylate), poly(butyl acrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate)), acrylic acid ester co-polymers, methacrylic acid derivative polymers, methacrylic acid homopolymers, methacrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and poly(2- ethylhexyl methacrylate)), acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate derivative polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and acrylic acid/acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and combinations of such materials. These and other suitable aqueous tackifying agents are described in U. S. Patent Application Ser. No. 10/864,061, filed on Jun. 9, 2004, and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 10/864,618, filed on Jun. 9, 2004.
US20050059558 and WO2006032833 disclose an extended list of suitable tackifying agents.
Silyl-modified polyamide compounds suitable for use as tackifying agents are substantially self-hardening compositions. Substantially self- hardening or self-cross-linking compositions, such as the silyl-modified polyamide compounds disclosed in US6439309, may also be used as the tackifying compounds of the present Invention. Silyl-modified polyamides
may be based, for example, on the reaction product of a silylating agent with a polyamide or a mixture of polyamides. When these silyl-modified polyamide compounds are introduced in the unhardened state into a subterranean formation, these compounds are capable of at least partially adhering to naturally-occurring particulates or proppant and then are further capable of self-hardening into a substantially non-tacky state without the need for the presence of separate hardening components or reactive components.
Addition of certain surfactants (such as those described in US5787986) to the tackifying compound may improve or facilitate the coating of the tackifying compound upon the particulate.
The particle containing a tackifying compound may also contain a multifunctional material, such as those described in US6047772. The multifunctional material reacts with the tackifying compound on the proppant to consolidate at least a portion of the proppant within the formation. Preferred multifunctional materials include at least one of aldehydes, dialdehydes, diacid halides, dihalides, polyacid anhydrides, epoxides and hemiacetals.
The compositions and methods of the present Invention may also be used in conjunction with deformable particles, such as those described in US6742590, EP 1398460, and MX 03008020. Preferably, deformable particles or solid materials of a larger size than the proppant particles are added and uniformly suspended in the fracturing fluid along with the proppant particles and encapsulated tackifying compound so that the smaller proppant particles stick to the larger deformable particles. The preferred
deformable particle or solid material is glass, ceramic, rubber, silicon, plastic, polymer, resin or metal, in the shape of fibers, shavings, platelets, and irregular shaped pieces. The deformable particles are preferably formed of rubber-coated proppant, resin beads, soft metal particulates, resin coated metal particulates and the like.
The methods and compositions of the Invention may also be used with a degradable material, such as those described in US20040261995 and WO2005000993, capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole. The term "irreversible" means that the degradable material, once degraded downhole, should not recrystallize or reconsolidate while downhole. The terms "degradation" or "degradable" refer to both of the two relatively extreme cases of hydrolytic degradation that the degradable material may undergo, i.e., heterogeneous (or bulk erosion) and homogeneous (or surface erosion), and any stage of degradation in between these two. This degradation can be a result of a chemical or thermal reaction. The proppant, encapsulated tackifying material, and degradable material may be pre-blended or may be mixed on-the-fly at the well site. The weight concentration of the degradable material in the total composition preferably ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%. A concentration of degradable material between about 1% and about 5% by weight is most preferable.
Preferably, the degradable material is selected to have a size, and shape similar to the size and shape of the curable proppant particulates to help maintain substantial uniformity within the mixture. It is preferable if the proppant particulates and the degradable material do not segregate within the proppant composition.
Whichever degradable material is utilized, the degradable materials may have any shape, depending on the desired characteristics of the resultant voids in the proppant matrix including but not limited to particles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other physical shape.
Mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent may also include composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material, for example as disclosed in U. S. Patent Applications US20050126780, and US20050130848. Such composite particles generally are more resistant to crushing forces within a fracture (as compared to degradable materials by themselves) and may help support the fracture and maintain the integrity of the proppant matrix. Also, when the composite particle degrades in the proppant pack, voids that have a desirable degree of integrity are formed, at least in part due to the high crush strength of the composite particles and the consolidation of the proppant matrix. Such voδds increase the proppant pack permeability.
Suitable composite particles include one or more than one of a polysaccharide; a chitin; a chitosan; a protein; an aliphatic polyester; a poly(lactide); a poly(glycolide); a poly(ε-caprolactone); a poly(hydroxy ester ether); a poly(hydroxybutyrate); a polyanhydride; a polycarbonate; a poly(orthoester); a poly(acetal); a poly(acrylate); a poly(alkylacrylate); a poly(amino acid); a poly(ethylene oxide); a poly ether ester; a polyester amide; a polyamide; a polyphosphazene; and copolymers and blends of such materials.
Inert fillers may also be included in mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent. Suitable inert fillers are materials that enhance the compressive strength of a proppant pack. Suitable fillers include calcium carbonate, talc, mica, glass, silica, silica flour, other similar mineral fillers, and mixtures of such materials.
The concentration of composite particles and/or fillers in the mixtures of proppant and encapsulated tackifying agent composition preferably range from about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of the total.
Any portion of the proppant particulates may be coated with a curable resin. A tackifying agent may be used rather than a curable resin. The tackifying agent helps distribute the degradable material within the proppant composition and keep it in place within the proppant matrix.
Suitable coating (encapsulating) materials include a water-soluble polymer taken from the classes of a polysaccharide; a polylactide; a polyglycolide; a polyorthoester; a polyaminoacid; a polylactoacid; a polyglycolacid; a polyacrylamide; a poly(ε-caprolactone); a chitosan; or a mixture of such materials.
Other suitable materials for the shells of encapsulated tackifying compounds include oil-soluble substances such as polyesters, polyolefins, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene. The shell may also be made from an insoluble polymer compound selected from the polyesters, polyacrylates, polyimides, phenol-aldehyde resins and mixtures of such materials. The shell may also be made from fluoroplasts, polymethacrylates, polyvinylidene chlorides, polyvinylchlorides, and mixtures of such materials.
Suitable shell thicknesses of capsules are in the range of from about 0.01 mm to about 1 mm. Suitable sizes of capsules containing adhesive compounds range from about 3.36 mm (about 6 mesh) to about 0.25 mm (about 60 mesh).
The encapsulated adhesive compound and proppant may be pre-mixed on or off location or may be mixed on the fly at the well site and than introduced into a subterranean formation. The blend preferably includes an amount of an encapsulated adhesive compound of between about 0.01% and about 20% by weight of proppant. Most preferably, the blend contains the tackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.05 to about 3.0 percent active material by weight of proppant. It is to be understood that larger quantities may be used; however, the larger quantities generally do not significantly increase performance and could undesirably reduce the permeability of the particulate pack.
The mechanism of the adhesive compound release may be one or more than one of shell breakage due to crushing, dissolution of the shell in the fracturing fluid or in subterranean water or crude oil, or diffusion of fluid into the capsule causing breakage, or diffusion of the tackifying compound out of the capsule. The adhesive compound (tackifying agent) is then dispersed in the inter-pore medium in the proppant in the fracture.
The shell may be partially destroyed during a fracture treatment at high pressure due to multiple collisions with proppant particles in the flow of the slurry. Shell thickness may influence a hydrostatic (diffusion) release mechanism. Aqueous or oil soluble polymer coatings may be employed.
Breakage of the capsule shells during the fracture closure is the major mechanism providing release of the adhesive compound. For efficient capsule breakage, capsule size should be larger than the pore sizes of the proppant pack.
To provide efficient coating of the particles (proppant) with the adhesive compound, the adhesive compound should be dispersed in the porous medium. If there is insufficient fluid motion relative to the particles, then the principle mechanism of dispersion is molecular diffusion, which is very slow.
The dispersion problem may be solved as follows. Pressure pulse generators provide high-frequency pressure pulses, causing fluid medium oscillations, the amplitudes of which are comparable to the proppant pack pore size. Micro-vortexes arising in the inter-pore medium provide efficient dispersion.
Any known pressure pulse generator may be employed; examples include cavitation generators, electro-hydraulic generators, ultrasonic generators, hydrodynamic generators, inducing water hammers at the end of the treatment, etc. An optimal depth of treatment by a pressure pulse generator is 5-10 meters.
An additional manner of using the methods and compositions of the present Invention is to use proppant mixed with encapsulated tackifying material in the far wellbore area of the fracture and then place an agent capable of controlling particulate flowback in the near wellbore area. The agent capable of controlling particulate flowback may be proppant coated with curable resin, may be fibers, or may be a screen sized to control the
flowback of the proppant. Placing proppant mixed with encapsulated tackifying material in the far wellbore area acts to help control the migration of formation sands and fines. Placing proppant coated with curable resin and/or fibers in the fracture near the well bore, or placing a screen in the well bore, acts to keep the proppant in place instead of producing it along with the produced fluids.
One of the major advantages of the introduction of encapsulated adhesive compounds is the ability to pump a proppant slurry containing only particles that do not have tacky properties. Thus the particles do not agglomerate. Compared to the composition and method of pumping a slurry containing an unprotected, available adhesive tackifying agent, the method and composition of the present Invention provides: (i) reduction in the probability of a screen-out, and (ii) lower proppant settling velocity during pumping and fracture closing. Furthermore, the Invention increases proppant pack strength even if closure stress cycling is employed, and encapsulated adhesive compounds do not require any shut-in time for activation.
Some tackifying compounds (such as those described in US5853048) may be used both to control fines migration and to control corrosion of ferrous metals. For example, suitable polyamide materials form a very thin film on the ferrous metal surfaces, protecting them from contact with aqueous fluids.
Encapsulated adhesive compounds are most effective if a forced closure procedure is applied.
The compositions and methods of the Invention may also be used for reduction of coal fines production from subterranean coal formations, including subterranean formations penetrated by gravel packed wellbores. The compositions and methods of the Invention may be used with treatment chemicals such as inhibitors, biocides, breakers, buffers, paraffin inhibitor and corrosion inhibitors. The compositions and methods of the Invention may be used when at least a portion of the proppant is resin-coated, resulting in tackified resin coated proppant.
Suitable proppant materials include any proppant or gravel used in the industry, for example ceramic particulate, sand of different shapes, proppant or sand with cured resin coating, expanded haydite, vermiculite, agloporite, or proppants with curable resin coating, and mixtures of such materials.
The Invention may be used in wells of any orientation, in open or cased holes, and with or without screens. The Invention may be used for wells for production, injection, or storage of any fluids, such as water, hydrocarbons or carbon dioxide.
Experimental:
Experiments on proppant flowback and proppant pack strength were carried out with apparatus including a pressure cell, built of Hastelloy and having a size 12 xl2 mm and a slot width of 10 mm. The tested sample was put into the cell and water was pumped through the slot. The water pumping system was a closed circuit including a 100 1/min water pump having a flow rate control, a flowmeter linked to a computer, a reduction valve, and a sedimentation tank. The flow rate was operator-controlled according to the readings of the flowmeter.
Experiments were carried out with the axial force impact produced by a hydraulic press. The system had a device for collecting any proppant carried out of the cell by flowback. This device included a gravitation filter with a multicell assembly for sampling. The entire system was automated. Data acquisition and processing were computer-controlled. The apparatus provided data on the proppant pack strength through a gradual increase in the water flow rate when the critical pack-destruction rate was reached.
Example 1 :
The proppant used was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand and the encapsulated tackifying compound was used at a concentration of 1 weight per cent of the proppant. The particulate was mixed with the fracture fluid. The size of the capsules of tackifying compound was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh), and the shell thickness was about 50 microns. The reference sample was pure 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand. The sample was loaded between two Ohio sandstone slabs in the apparatus for testing of the proppant pack strength. A standard procedure was used: a 20.6 MPa closure pressure was applied to the cell, then the cell was heated up to 950C and kept at this temperature for 2 hours at a constant water flow rate of 50 ml/min until complete degradation of the fracture fluid had occurred. The pack strength testing was carried out with a stream of hot water (95°C) containing 2% KCl. The solution flow rate was increased gradually until complete destruction of the pack had occurred. Pack destruction was indicated by a drastic pressure drop (as shown by readings from differential pressure gauges) and by visual observation of the proppant particulate on the gravitation filters. Measurements demonstrated a 19-fold increase in the
strength of the pack from sand initial mixed with encapsulated tackifying agent in comparison to the reference case of pure proppant.
Example 2:
The proppant used was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh) sand and the encapsulated tackifying compound was used at a concentration of 1 weight per cent of the proppant. The particulate was mixed with the fracture fluid. The size of the capsules of tackifying compound was 0.42 to 0.84 mm (20/40 mesh), and the shell thickness was about 50 microns. The same apparatus as example 1 was used. The sample was loaded between two Ohio sandstone slabs in the apparatus for testing of the proppant pack strength. The proppant bed contained the operating element of an ultrasound piezoelectric generator. This element was a metal cylinder having a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 10 mm. This cell was compressed with a closure pressure of 20.6 MPa. Then the cell was heated up to 950C and kept at this temperature for 2 hours at a constant water flow rate of 50 ml/min until complete degradation of the fracture fluid had occurred. After that, the tackifying agent was further activated with ultrasound emissions of the piezoelectric generator (frequency of 10-15 kHz; power of 20W) for 10 minutes. The pack strength testing was carried out with a stream of hot water (950C) containing 2% KCl. The solution flow rate was increased gradually until complete destruction of the pack had occurred. Pack destruction was indicated by a drastic pressure drop (as shown by readings from differential pressure gauges) and by visual observation of the proppant particulate on the gravitation filters. Measurements demonstrated a 48-fold increase in the strength of the pack initially mixed with encapsulated tackifying agent and
further treated with pressure pulses (ultrasound) in comparison to a reference case of pure proppant.
Claims
1. A method for creating a fracture in a subterranean formation comprising injecting a mixture of a proppant with an encapsulated tackifying compound, and allowing said tackifying compound to be released during or after fracture closure.
2. The method of claim 1 further wherein the tackifying compound release process is enhanced with pressure pulses.
3. The method of a claim 1 or 2 wherein the amount of encapsulated tackifying compound varies from 0.01 to 20 weight per cent relative to the proppant.
4. A capsule comprising a protective shell containing a tackifying compound.
5. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the tackifying compound comprises a material selected from at least one of polyamides; quaternized polyamides; polyesters; polycarbonates; polycarbamates; natural resins; acrylates; silylated polyamides; and mixtures thereof.
6. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the tackifying compound is non- hardening.
7. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the capsule size ranges from 0.25 mm to 3.36 mm, and the protective shell has a thickness in the range of 0.01 to 1 mm.
8. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the protective shell comprises a water- soluble polymer.
9. The capsule of claim 8 wherein the protective shell comprises a water- soluble polymer selected from at least one of a polysaccharide; a polylactide; a polyglycolide; a polyorthoester; a polyaminoacid, a polyactoacid, a polyglycolacid, a polyacrylamide, poly(ε-caprolactone); a chitosan; and mixtures thereof.
10. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the protective shell comprises an oil- soluble polymer.
11. The capsule of claim 10 wherein the protective shell comprises an oil- soluble polymer selected from at least one of a polyester; a polyolefins; a low density polyethylene; a high density polyethylene; a polypropylene; and mixtures thereof.
12. The capsule of claim 4 wherein the protective shell comprises an insoluble polymer compound selected from at least one of polyesters; polyacrylates; polyimides; phenol-aldehyde resins; fluoroplasts; polymethacrylates; polyvinylidene chlorides; polyvinylchlorides; and mixtures thereof.
13. The capsule of claim 4 further comprising at least one of a deformable material; a surfactant; a multifunctional material; a degradable material; a filler material; an inert filler material; and mixtures thereof.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/RU2007/000708 WO2009078745A1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2007-12-14 | Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/RU2007/000708 WO2009078745A1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2007-12-14 | Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2009078745A1 true WO2009078745A1 (en) | 2009-06-25 |
Family
ID=40795725
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/RU2007/000708 WO2009078745A1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2007-12-14 | Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| WO (1) | WO2009078745A1 (en) |
Cited By (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012021373A1 (en) | 2010-08-12 | 2012-02-16 | Conocophillips Company | Controlled release material |
| WO2014045815A1 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2014-03-27 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Well proppant and method for recovering hydrocarbon from hydrocarbon-bearing formation |
| WO2015041673A1 (en) * | 2013-09-20 | 2015-03-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Compositions and methods for forming and utilizing stable, single-component resin mixture |
| US9297244B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing comprising a coating of hydrogel-forming polymer |
| US9315721B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-04-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| EP2909282A4 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2016-07-13 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Hollow hydrogel capsules and methods of using the same |
| US9528351B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-12-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Gravel and fracture packing using fibers |
| WO2017007462A1 (en) * | 2015-07-07 | 2017-01-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of using low-strength proppant in high closure strees fractures |
| US9644139B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2017-05-09 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9845427B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2017-12-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Proppants for hydraulic fracturing technologies |
| US9856415B1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2018-01-02 | Superior Silica Sands, LLC | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US9868896B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2018-01-16 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9879174B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2018-01-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of fluid slug consolidation within a fluid system in downhole applications |
| US9932521B2 (en) | 2014-03-05 | 2018-04-03 | Self-Suspending Proppant, Llc | Calcium ion tolerant self-suspending proppants |
| US10040990B1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2018-08-07 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10215007B2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2019-02-26 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Consolidation of proppant in hydraulic fractures |
| US10655466B2 (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2020-05-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of monitoring of hydraulic fracture closure stress with tracers (variants) |
| US10920494B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2021-02-16 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10941336B2 (en) | 2016-04-29 | 2021-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Hydraulic fracturing method using non-standard proppant |
| US10947447B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2021-03-16 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US11713415B2 (en) | 2018-11-21 | 2023-08-01 | Covia Solutions Inc. | Salt-tolerant self-suspending proppants made without extrusion |
| US11732179B2 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2023-08-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Proppant-fiber schedule for far field diversion |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6209643B1 (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 2001-04-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of controlling particulate flowback in subterranean wells and introducing treatment chemicals |
| US20040043906A1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2004-03-04 | Heath Stephen Mark | Microcapsule well treatment |
| US20050194136A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Nguyen Philip D. | Methods of preparing and using coated particulates |
-
2007
- 2007-12-14 WO PCT/RU2007/000708 patent/WO2009078745A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6209643B1 (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 2001-04-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of controlling particulate flowback in subterranean wells and introducing treatment chemicals |
| US20040043906A1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2004-03-04 | Heath Stephen Mark | Microcapsule well treatment |
| US20050194136A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Nguyen Philip D. | Methods of preparing and using coated particulates |
Cited By (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US11999907B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2024-06-04 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10947447B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2021-03-16 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10920494B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2021-02-16 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10266757B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2019-04-23 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US10040990B1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2018-08-07 | Aquasmart Enterprises, Llc | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US9856415B1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2018-01-02 | Superior Silica Sands, LLC | Hydraulic fracture composition and method |
| US9845427B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2017-12-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Proppants for hydraulic fracturing technologies |
| US9845428B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2017-12-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Proppants for hydraulic fracturing technologies |
| US9879174B2 (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2018-01-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of fluid slug consolidation within a fluid system in downhole applications |
| WO2012021373A1 (en) | 2010-08-12 | 2012-02-16 | Conocophillips Company | Controlled release material |
| US10316244B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2019-06-11 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9315721B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-04-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9796916B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2017-10-24 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9644139B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2017-05-09 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9845429B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2017-12-19 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9868896B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2018-01-16 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US10472943B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2019-11-12 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing |
| US9297244B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Self-Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing comprising a coating of hydrogel-forming polymer |
| US9528351B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-12-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Gravel and fracture packing using fibers |
| WO2014045815A1 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2014-03-27 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Well proppant and method for recovering hydrocarbon from hydrocarbon-bearing formation |
| JPWO2014045815A1 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2016-08-18 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Methods for recovering hydrocarbons from well propellants and hydrocarbon-bearing formations |
| US10000681B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2018-06-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hollow hydrogel capsules and methods of using the same |
| EP2909282A4 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2016-07-13 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Hollow hydrogel capsules and methods of using the same |
| US10662361B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2020-05-26 | Hallibunon Energy Services, Inc. | Hollow hydrogel capsules and methods of using the same |
| US9840655B2 (en) | 2013-09-20 | 2017-12-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Compositions and methods for forming and utilizing stable, single-component resin mixture |
| WO2015041673A1 (en) * | 2013-09-20 | 2015-03-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Compositions and methods for forming and utilizing stable, single-component resin mixture |
| US10215007B2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2019-02-26 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Consolidation of proppant in hydraulic fractures |
| US9932521B2 (en) | 2014-03-05 | 2018-04-03 | Self-Suspending Proppant, Llc | Calcium ion tolerant self-suspending proppants |
| US10280363B2 (en) | 2015-07-07 | 2019-05-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of using low-strength proppant in high closure stress fractures |
| WO2017007462A1 (en) * | 2015-07-07 | 2017-01-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of using low-strength proppant in high closure strees fractures |
| US10655466B2 (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2020-05-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of monitoring of hydraulic fracture closure stress with tracers (variants) |
| US10941336B2 (en) | 2016-04-29 | 2021-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Hydraulic fracturing method using non-standard proppant |
| US11732179B2 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2023-08-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Proppant-fiber schedule for far field diversion |
| US12269988B2 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2025-04-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Proppant-fiber schedule for far field diversion |
| US11713415B2 (en) | 2018-11-21 | 2023-08-01 | Covia Solutions Inc. | Salt-tolerant self-suspending proppants made without extrusion |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2009078745A1 (en) | Proppant flowback control using encapsulated adhesive materials | |
| US8061424B2 (en) | Method for hydraulic fracturing of subterranean formation | |
| US7325608B2 (en) | Methods of hydraulic fracturing and of propping fractures in subterranean formations | |
| US7281581B2 (en) | Methods of hydraulic fracturing and of propping fractures in subterranean formations | |
| US9670764B2 (en) | Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill | |
| EP1859001B1 (en) | Methods of creating high porosity propped fractures | |
| US7581590B2 (en) | Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill | |
| US8763699B2 (en) | Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill | |
| CA2716186C (en) | Slip-layer fluid placement | |
| CA2867502C (en) | Methods of forming high-porosity fractures in weakly consolidated or unconsolidated formations | |
| US20130161003A1 (en) | Proppant placement | |
| US20140138085A1 (en) | Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill | |
| Nguyen et al. | Evaluation of low-quality sand for proppant-free channel fracturing method | |
| CN103362489B (en) | Method used for stratum hydraulic fracture | |
| AU2015202225B2 (en) | Methods of forming high-porosity fractures in weakly consolidated or unconsolidated formations | |
| MX2008009169A (en) | Method for hydraulic fracturing of subterranean formation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 07872869 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 07872869 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |