[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2006112713A2 - Methode de criblage a rendement eleve pour l'evaluation de l'heterogeneite de micro-organismes - Google Patents

Methode de criblage a rendement eleve pour l'evaluation de l'heterogeneite de micro-organismes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006112713A2
WO2006112713A2 PCT/NL2006/050087 NL2006050087W WO2006112713A2 WO 2006112713 A2 WO2006112713 A2 WO 2006112713A2 NL 2006050087 W NL2006050087 W NL 2006050087W WO 2006112713 A2 WO2006112713 A2 WO 2006112713A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
microorganisms
support
compartments
micro
cell
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/NL2006/050087
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2006112713A3 (fr
Inventor
Colin Ingham
Willem Meindert De Vos
Johannes Epeüs Theodoor VAN HYLCKAMA VLIEG
Johan Gerrit Bomer
Adrianus Joseph Sprenkels
Albert Van Den Berg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DSM IP Assets BV
Original Assignee
DSM IP Assets BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from PCT/NL2006/050078 external-priority patent/WO2006112709A2/fr
Application filed by DSM IP Assets BV filed Critical DSM IP Assets BV
Priority to US11/918,612 priority Critical patent/US20100021959A1/en
Priority to EP06733066A priority patent/EP1871893A2/fr
Publication of WO2006112713A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006112713A2/fr
Publication of WO2006112713A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006112713A3/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms
    • C12Q1/04—Determining presence or kind of microorganism; Use of selective media for testing antibiotics or bacteriocides; Compositions containing a chemical indicator therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J19/0046—Sequential or parallel reactions, e.g. for the synthesis of polypeptides or polynucleotides; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making molecular arrays
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00277—Apparatus
    • B01J2219/00351—Means for dispensing and evacuation of reagents
    • B01J2219/00427—Means for dispensing and evacuation of reagents using masks
    • B01J2219/00432—Photolithographic masks
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00277—Apparatus
    • B01J2219/00497—Features relating to the solid phase supports
    • B01J2219/00527—Sheets
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00277—Apparatus
    • B01J2219/0054—Means for coding or tagging the apparatus or the reagents
    • B01J2219/00572—Chemical means
    • B01J2219/00576—Chemical means fluorophore
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00585—Parallel processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00596—Solid-phase processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00605—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being directly bound or immobilised to solid supports
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00605—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being directly bound or immobilised to solid supports
    • B01J2219/0061—The surface being organic
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00605—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being directly bound or immobilised to solid supports
    • B01J2219/00612—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being directly bound or immobilised to solid supports the surface being inorganic
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00605—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being directly bound or immobilised to solid supports
    • B01J2219/00614—Delimitation of the attachment areas
    • B01J2219/00621—Delimitation of the attachment areas by physical means, e.g. trenches, raised areas
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00639—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being trapped in or bound to a porous medium
    • B01J2219/00641—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces the compounds being trapped in or bound to a porous medium the porous medium being continuous, e.g. porous oxide substrates
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00583—Features relative to the processes being carried out
    • B01J2219/00603—Making arrays on substantially continuous surfaces
    • B01J2219/00659—Two-dimensional arrays
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
    • B01J2219/00718—Type of compounds synthesised
    • B01J2219/0072—Organic compounds
    • B01J2219/0074—Biological products
    • B01J2219/00743—Cells

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of microbiology.
  • a High Throughput (HT) method for assessing heterogeneity of microorganisms or interaction between microorganisms is provided.
  • This method makes use of (bio-)chips, which allow the analysis of cells and micro-colonies in situ, with minimal disturbance of cells or microbial communities. Characteristic is that the method provided is particularly powerful for High Throughput Screening (HTS) purposes.
  • the results of the method are an analysis of aspects of the heterogeneity or interactions within the sample population.
  • this analysis allows the selection of microorganisms showing characteristics related to aspects of heterogeneity and interactions from the bio-chip.
  • microorganisms are used in the production of food ingredients and bulk and fine chemicals.
  • pharmaceutical products and food/feed products as well as in industrial applications.
  • microorganisms or populations of microorganisms are used.
  • these are organisms, which remain stable and do not vary significantly in phenotype and genotype when grown in culture or when present in the product. Heterogeneity within microbial populations is, therefore, of great interest as are methods to assess this. This not only applies to the industrially used microorganisms but also to those that are undesired and may contaminate a product, such as pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms.
  • heterogeneity is of importance in case new strains are developed for industrial applications, and specifically methods to assess this heterogeneity and select strains with desired traits are of utmost importance.
  • Heterogeneity in microorganisms has both a genetic and a non-genetic (environment plus noise) component.
  • Micro-organisms are characterized by an extraordinary degree of divergence and heterogeneity, they have representatives in all kingdoms of life and there is a high degree of plasticity and heterogeneity even within a species. Additionally, even within a clonal population, the influence of noise and environment can generate considerable heterogeneity resulting in different states of existence (such as differentiation into spores or a differential response to stress or antimicrobial agents).
  • HT high throughput
  • Microarrays for use in HT methods have been described in WO 03/102578.
  • the microarrays are used only for screening the response of cells to target compounds, i.e. compound-induced responses, and not intrinsic or natural variation of cells or cell- to-cell interactions.
  • the cells or cell components screened for a compound-induced reaction are homogeneous cells.
  • screening analyses the collected data in a different way compared to the present invention.
  • the distribution range of variation between microorganisms and/or micro-colonies is determined, while in WO03/102578 this is not done, as only the mean response is of interest.
  • a particular aspect of heterogeneity lies in how cells or microorganisms interact with each other, thus the object of the invention is to provide a HT method for determining interactions between cells or microorganisms as well.
  • Heterogeneity and “variability” are used herein interchangeably to refer to differences between cells or microorganisms.
  • the term encompasses genetic variation, phenotypic variation and environmental variation.
  • “Intrinsic heterogeneity” or “natural heterogeneity” refers to the differences or variation already intrinsically present between the cells of a population of cells.
  • the cells may differ in their growth rate when contacted with one particular growth medium.
  • external stimuli or factors e.g. a particular nutrient, stress, heat or a toxic agent
  • an apparently clonal population of a bacterium may be grown on a solid support and variation in cell length may be observed. The variation however may be moderate as a result of different stages of cell division, unequal partition of molecules in dividing cells, the odd mutation and various other reasons.
  • Microorganism refers to bacteria, archaea, viruses (including phage), fungi (including yeast species), oomycetes, protozoa, mycoplasmas, algae, microspores, and pollen but also nanobacteria and artificial cells (e.g. by gutting live cells or filling lipid membranes with biomolecules) and/or artificial microorganisms (e.g. hybrid bacteria due to genomic shuffling and mating techniques (e.g. between E.
  • a "population of microorganisms" may thus refer to a plurality of cells of a single microorganism (e.g. bacterial cells of one or more species or strains) or to a plurality of cells of two or more different microorganisms, e.g. a mixture of fungal cells and bacterial cells.
  • Micro-colony refers to a small number of cells (two or more), derived from a single cell or from a single microorganism still in close proximity. In this context it is noted that often an inoculum is more than one cell, for example by coincidence or more commonly because more than one cell is joined to another. Therefore micro-colony also refers to colony forming unit (cfu). The formation of a micro-colony involves one or more cell-divisions. In addition "colonies” may also be formed during incubation through changes of a cell without cell division, such as cell growth (enlargement) without cell division or cell differentiation without cell division and colonies may merge or form more complex structures such as bio films. For reasons of clarity these "colonies” will not be referred to as micro-colonies herein, but simply as microorganism(s) or cell(s).
  • 'Tnteraction(s)" or “cell-to-cell interaction(s)” refers to both direct or indirect interactions between at least two cells (or microorganisms).
  • Direct interaction refers to physical contact between the cells. Examples of direct interactions include direct contact of cell walls or membranes (in some cases mediated by specific receptors) or even fusion of these structures or entry of one cell into another, or interactions via cell surface structures such as pili.
  • Indirect interaction refers to indirect contact between the cells, such as through metabolites or signaling compounds or nucleic acids or enzymes or other molecules being secreted by one cell into the medium, wherein only the metabolites come into physical contact with the other cell (or organism).
  • cell-to-cell interaction(s) refers to interactions between cells or microorganisms of the same species as well as to interactions between cells or microorganisms of different species including in complex communities such as biofilms.
  • reporter compounds are compounds which assist in the detection of heterogeneity or interactions, such as cell staining dyes, recombinant reporter gene products such as the green fluorescent protein (GFP) or enzymes, etc.
  • reporter compounds may be either contacted with the cells by external application, for example to the medium underlying the support, or they may be present or induced in, or introduced into, the cells themselves.
  • Food-grade micro-organisms are in particular organisms, which are considered as not harmful, when ingested by a human or animal subject.
  • a "subject” refers herein to a human or non-human animal, in particular a vertebrate, such as but not limited to domestic animals.
  • Probiotics or “probiotic strain(s)” refers to strains of live micro-organisms, preferably bacteria, which have a beneficial effect on the host when ingested (e.g. enterally or by inhalation) by a subject.
  • High-throughput as in high throughput screening (HTS) refers to a process designed to perform a large number of assays, including assay(s) on a large number of cells, in an automated or semi-automated fashion. How large this number is will depend on the context of the particular assay, but for example in screening for genetic differences it is desirable to examine millions of cells. In other contexts HTS can be regarded as at least hundreds of thousands of assays or screenings per day but also screening of considerably lower numbers of cells still is considered to be high throughput in the context of this invention.
  • high throughput also encompasses ultra-high throughput (UHT)
  • Ultra-high throughput UHT
  • High content HC refers to a variation on HTS in which the amount and quality of the information is of a higher priority, sometimes at the expense of throughput but still dealing with a large number of assays.
  • high throughput in the context of this invention also encompasses high content and thus HTS also refers to “high content screening” (HCS).
  • a HTP method for determining the heterogeneity of a population of microorganisms is provided.
  • the method comprising the steps of: (a) contacting the microorganisms with a (preferably rigid) porous support,
  • the method of the invention allows determining the intrinsic heterogeneity of a population of microorganisms.
  • the focus of the present method is thus on measuring heterogeneity rather than on determining a magnitude of response.
  • a HTS involves treating a bacterial population with an antibiotic and seeing if it kills the target bacterium.
  • many aspects of heterogeneity are a problem - it is noise that makes the assay more difficult and less reliable.
  • the present invention thus is not concerned with the absolute effect of an external factor such as for example an antibiotic, but the focus is on how an external factor brings the diversity and stability of the population to light.
  • a plurality of cells or microorganisms is provided, which is to be analysed.
  • the starting population of cells may vary, depending on the aim of the analysis.
  • the starting population may be a mixture of microorganisms found in a natural sample, such as a soil sample, a water sample, an air sample, a urine sample and the like.
  • the sample may be a man-made composition, such as a food or drink, or a composition which is to be used in the preparation of a food or drink (such as a starter culture to be used in the preparation of fermented products, such as yoghurts, beer, etc.).
  • libraries of mutant or recombinant microorganisms e.g. mutant or recombinant bacteria may be analysed.
  • single strains or isolates commonly used in research or in the preparation of pharmaceutical or nutritional compositions may be analysed, in order to determine whether these are homogeneous (i.e. there is low heterogeneity between the cells derived from a single starting cell or colony) and stable.
  • homogeneous i.e. there is low heterogeneity between the cells derived from a single starting cell or colony
  • stable In principle any starting population of cells or microorganisms may be used.
  • the starting population may initially be grown, for example in liquid culture, to increase the number of cells. For example, if heterogeneity of a single spore isolate of a fungus is to be determined, the single spore isolate may first be grown to provide a plurality of cells derived from it. Likewise, the starting population may be purified or partially purified using methods known in the art (for example by filtration or centrifugation or with a fluorescent activated cell sorter) prior to contacting the population with the support. The removal of debris and other non-cellular components may be desirable for accurate detection.
  • the starting cells or microorganisms may be of a single species or of a mixture of species. Similarly, if the starting microorganism is of a single species, it may be of a single strain (e.g. single clone or strain) or it may be a mixture of strains. Examples of species that may be analyzed are (plant or animal) pathogen species. For example human or animal pathogens include such bacteria as Legionella, pneumophila, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pathogenic E. coli strains, Salmonella ssp., Klebsiella spp., Hafnia alvei, Haemophilus influenzae, Proteus spp.
  • pathogenic fungi such as yeasts, e.g. Candida species including C. albicans, C krusei and C tropicalis, and filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus or Penicillium marneffei including dermatophytes such as Trichophyton rubrum.
  • free-living protozoans such as pathogenic free- living amoeba may also be analysed or protozoans carrying bacterial pathogens such as Legionella.
  • Plant pathogens include for example Pseudomonas species (e.g.
  • Pseudomonas solanacearum Pseudomonas solanacearum
  • Xylella fastidiosa Ralstonia solanacearum
  • Xanthomonas campestris Erwinia amylovora, Fusarium species, Phytophthora species (e.g. P. infestans), Botrytis species, Leptosphaeria species, powdery mildews (Ascomycota) and rusts (Basidiomycota), etc.
  • compositions comprising one or more species or strains of food-grade microorganisms and/or probiotic microorganisms such as but not limited to species of the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Oenococcus,
  • Corynebacterium are used. Yeast species, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast or brewer's yeast) or S. pastorianum (lager yeast) may also be used as are fungi such as Aspergillus or Rhizopus spp..
  • micro-organisms are envisaged, for example those used in industrial processes such as the production of enzymes (e.g. in biological washing powders from organisms such as Bacillus subtilis) or thermophilic Archeaea (e.g. Sulfolobus sulfotaricus) or other extremophiles or with uses in bioremediation or yeasts and fungi such as Hansenula, Pichia, Aspergillus etc.
  • Strains involved in bioleaching for metal release from ore may also be used, such as Geobacter sulfureducens and Pseudomonas isachenkovii.
  • starting populations of microorganisms will be given further below, as the aim of the analysis determines which cells to start with. For example if the aim is to test whether a certain strain is homogeneous and stable, one starts with a plurality of cells of this strain.
  • step (a) the microorganisms, or the composition comprising these, are contacted with a porous support.
  • the pores are important for allowing compounds, such as nutrients or reporter compounds to diffuse through the pores from underneath the support.
  • the pore size must be small enough so that the cells do not pass through the pores.
  • Various supports which are suitable for use in the method are available in the art or can be made using known methods. For a specific embodiment of the porous support (or biochip, see below).
  • porous supports are made of metal oxides.
  • Such supports are already commercially available in the art, e.g. Anapore® inorganic supports (see e.g. WO 99/02266), which are available from Whatman. More specific embodiments are described below
  • the cells may be applied to one or to both surfaces of the support.
  • the microorganisms are contacted with the upper surface of the support, while the lower surface of the support is contacted with (solid, liquid or semi-solid) medium.
  • Contacting can be achieved by various methods, such as (but not limited to) dipping, spreading, spraying or pipeting of a composition comprising the microorganisms onto one or both surfaces.
  • the cell density on the support can be adapted as desired, by preparing compositions (e.g. liquid suspensions in sterile water) comprising a suitable cell concentration. Also, dilution series of cell suspensions may be used as inoculum for a series of supports. Although for most applications it is generally preferred that cells are distributed so that they are separated from one another in order to allow micro-colonies being formed (preferably arising from one or more cell divisions of a single cell), higher concentrations may also be suitable. For example, cells may be in close proximity or in contact with one another. For some applications the densities may be sufficiently high to allow biofilms (i.e. cell monolayers or multiple layers) to be formed following incubation.
  • compositions e.g. liquid suspensions in sterile water
  • dilution series of cell suspensions may be used as inoculum for a series of supports.
  • higher concentrations may also be suitable.
  • cells may be in close proximity or in contact with one another.
  • the densities may be sufficiently high to allow
  • Suitable concentration of support-inoculum may thus result in cell densities of e.g. 100 to 2000 cells per mm 2 of support, or more. Obviously, suitable cell densities may differ from one microorganism to another, and may again be different for mixtures of organism. Likewise, the aim of the analysis (heterogeneity or cell interaction) will also influence the choice of cell density. A skilled person can easily determine the optimal cell density and inoculum concentration for a desired analysis.
  • the support is in step (b) incubated on a medium in order to allow cell growth, cell differentiation and/or micro-colony formation.
  • the medium used may comprise one or more of the following: nutrients, minerals, other compounds such as chemical inducers or inhibitors of cellular processes, compounds involved in respiratory metabolism (e.g. electron acceptors) or in cellular energy metabolism or transduction, antibiotics or toxins, proteins or peptides, carbohydrates or nucleic acids, compounds that may influence cellular interaction or adhesion, enzyme substrates, reporter molecules, etc.
  • the medium is homogenous with respect to the support, although a medium comprising gradients of one or more compounds along the support is also envisaged for certain applications. For example, a 2D gradient of the two most important end-metabolites in a fermentation could be used to test that a production strain was stable under the range of conditions encountered during a fermentation. Also, a gradient could be used to define the concentration of two signaling compounds that trigger a cell: cell interaction, such as a mating.
  • the medium may be solid, liquid or semi-solid.
  • a simple agar medium suitable for maintaining cell viability, growth, cell division and/or differentiation, may be used.
  • the pH may be adapted, depending on the organisms being tested.
  • the medium is a growth medium, suitable for culturing the microorganism(s). Such media are well known in the art.
  • the medium may also be one which allows selective growth of one or more species of microorganisms or induces particular changes (e.g. spore formation or germination).
  • the medium not only brings the microorganisms into contact with compounds or components of the medium (such as nutrients) but also removes compounds, such as waste compounds in order to prevent or reduce these compounds to significantly change the micro-environment.
  • waste compounds such as lactic acid, or other metabolites produced by the microorganisms
  • the incubation conditions may also vary, depending on the microorganisms and the phenotypic characteristics which are to be analyzed.
  • incubation temperature(s) chosen may vary
  • incubation period(s) may vary
  • humidity may vary
  • aerobic or anaerobic conditions may be used (e.g. for facultative anaerobes anaerobic conditions are required), etc.
  • incubation time is at least about 20 minutes, which allows micro-colony formation, e.g. comprising on average 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or more cells per micro-colony.
  • Incubation times may range from 20 minutes to several hours, up to about eight hours.
  • the incubation step (b) comprises incubation in a suitable gas phase, such as oxygen or an oxygen comprising gas phase and/or a lack of oxygen.
  • a suitable gas phase such as oxygen or an oxygen comprising gas phase and/or a lack of oxygen.
  • gaseous components e.g. oxygen or other electron acceptors
  • a switch between aerobic and anaerobic conditions is encompassed herein, by incubating the support first in an anaerobic or aerobic gas phase and then switching to the other phase.
  • the heterogeneity within the population is revealed or amplified by submitting the micororganisms to external stimuli (or factors) such as heat, cold, salt, toxins, antibiotics or other antimicrobial compounds, osmotic stress, infectious agents such as viruses etc.
  • external stimuli or factors
  • Heterogeneity thus refers to difference between cells or microorganisms. Differences can be generated by genetic means (specified by nucleic acids, possibly other heritable mechanism such as covalent modification of stable or replicated molecules), by differences in environment or experience or by chance, such as unequal partition of rare molecules during cell-division. Usually such differences come to light as a phenotypic characteristic.
  • Phenotypic characteristics refer herein to any feature or combination of features (whether macroscopic, microscopic, molecular, biochemical, physiological) of the cells which is to be measured or assessed and which indicate the degree of heterogeneity between the cells or between (or within) micro- colonies, such as (but in no way limiting): cell or micro-colony sizes, shape(s), textures, ability to retain stains or dyes and/or colors; growth rate, viability, differentiation or behaviour including motility, nucleic acid distribution; gene expression; protein (enzyme) production, changes in cell wall (including septation), capsule, membranes or other layer(s) surrounding the cell or structures protruding from the cell such as flagella or pili, metabolite production (e.g.
  • folic acid levels or aspects of energy transduction or consequences of metabolism such as changes in pH, changes in organelle or vesicle structure, secreted products including hormones and signaling peptides or quorum sensing autoinducers or nucleic acids or enzymes; mRNA levels (transcription of one or more genes); DNA or mRNA fingerprints; protein compositions, levels or activities; responsiveness to environmental factors; presence/absence or transfer of mobile genetic elements (transposons, viruses, plasmids, etc.); the (degree of) direct or indirect interaction between micro-organisms such as predation, formation of complex multicellular structures or communities (such as biofilms) that may be of the same or of different species, competition for nutrients, action of bacterocidins, release of signaling compounds that result in the formation of complex communities, adhesion, close cooperation between organisms including sharing of energy metabolism, etc.
  • micro-organisms such as predation, formation of complex multicellular structures or communities (such as biofilms) that may be of the same or of
  • the phenotypic characteristics may be determined qualitatively (e.g. presence or absence of a feature) or quantitatively (e.g. length of cells).
  • Step (c) involves the determination of the heterogeneity or of the interaction between the cells, microorganism or micro-colonies.
  • This step involves the scoring of one or more phenotypic characteristics, as defined above. For example, if the intra- or inter- micro-colony heterogeneity in terms of cell length or morphology is to be analyzed, the length of a large number of cells is measured and statistical analysis of the data is used to determine the heterogeneity of the population (see Examples). More examples will be given herein below.
  • the methods used for detecting the heterogeneity i.e. for assessing one or more phenotypes
  • the collected data is then preferably analyzed using statistics, whereby the analysis comprises a step wherein the distribution range of variation between the microorganisms and/or micro-colonies is analyzed and optionally compared to an expected (model) distribution range, as further described in the Examples.
  • an expected (model) distribution range Preferably any deviation from the expected (model) distribution, such as a model based on randomness, reveal the heterogeneity within the population.
  • the support surface may be examined through a light microscope (e.g. light-, fluorescent-, confocal- or scanning electron microscopy) or by surface plasmon resonance, conductivity, enzyme assays, mass spectrometry, etc..
  • image analysis refers to the surface examination of the support surface, either by eye, e.g. through a microscope, or by a camera or laser scanner or other apparatus scanning the support surface, which then in turn may produce images or any other output data, such as counts, etc.).
  • the support surface is analysed directly using laser scanning, especially rapid laser scanning methods, whereby the support surface is scanned to detect the microorganims or the reporter compound.
  • Such scanners are available in the art such as the ChemScan®RDI (Chemunex InCeIl Analyser 3000 (RTS Life Science International/ Amersham Biosciences).
  • a rapid (in situ) staining method is used.
  • the support is transferred to a medium comprising one or more reporter compounds, such as (fluorescent or luminescent) dyes which stain e.g. living (or dead) cells, or particular cellular components (e.g. nucleic acids, etc).
  • the reporter compounds are able to diffuse through the pores of the support and thereby rapidly come into contact with the cells, with minimal disruption of the location of the cells on the support. If the reporter compound is already present or produced in the cells (e.g. GFP protein), it need not to be brought into contact with the cells. However, in certain detection methods the reporter compound is only released or developed in or by the cells upon contact with another compound (e.g. an enzyme, which cleaves a compound present in the cells, thereby causing the cell to emit light). In such indirect detection methods the other compound(s) needed are also referred to as reporter compounds herein, even though these are not the compounds detected directly.
  • reporter compounds such as (fluorescent or luminescent) dyes
  • the rapid staining method does, therefore, not necessarily require cell fixation, which has the advantages that the cellular distribution is retained and that cells or sub-cellular components are not damaged. Some artefacts are thereby avoided.
  • the reporter compound is a dye or luminescent compound (e.g. a fluorogenic or chromogenic compound) or a mixture of several compounds, such as
  • Fluo-3, Fluo-4, and Ca-dyes such as e. g. Calcium Green-1, Syto dyes (Invitrogen), fluorescein isothiocyanate, rhodamine, malachite green, Oregon green, Texas Red,
  • FAM Fluorescein
  • JOE 6-carboxy X- rhodamine
  • HEX 6-carboxy-2', 4', T, 4, 7-hexachloro fluorescein
  • HEX 5- carboxyfluorescein
  • TAMRA N 5 N, N', N'tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine
  • cyanine dyes e. g.Cy5, Cy3
  • BODIPY dyes e. g.
  • GFP or eGFP green fluorescent protein
  • BFP blue fluorescent protein
  • YFP yellow fluorescent protein
  • RFP red fluorescent protein
  • Fluorescent nano-particles such as quantum dots may also be employed. Advanced uses of fluorescence dyes as above in such techniques as FRET or in vivo tracking of molecules is also envisaged.
  • viability labels such as for example Fluorassure® or calcein/calcein-AM based fluorescent compounds may be used (e.g. obtainable from Sigma; esterases within viable cells cleave calcein-AM to produce calcein, which is then detected and is directly proportional to the number of viable cells).
  • Esterase substrates include cFDA cell-tracker compounds (Molecular Probes).
  • the medium is, for example, contacted with a (fluorogenic or chromogenic) substrate, which is taken up and converted by a viable cell to a fluorochrome or chromophore, which can then be detected. Viability or metabolic activity may also be detected by pH or membrane potential-sensitive fluorescent agents (e.g. tetrazolium-based dyes).
  • Reporter compounds may also be nucleic acids including modified analogues thereof or radioactively labeled molecules, peptides, proteins, and antibodies or antibody fragments, enzyme substrates, etc.
  • the support may be contacted with labelled antibodies (e.g. monoclonal antibodies raised against a specific antigen).
  • the antibody, attached to the cell may be detected directly (by detection of the label attached thereto), or indirectly by using e.g. another labelled antibody directed against the specific itself. Labelled cells may then be detected by e.g. fluorescence microscopy or laser scanning. It may be advantageous to apply this particular method in combination with cell fixation (vide infra).
  • Radiolabels may be detected using photographic film or scintillation counters
  • fluorescent markers may be detected using a photo detector to detect emitted illumination.
  • Enzymatic labels are typically detected by providing the enzyme with an enzyme substrate and detecting the reaction product produced by the action of the enzyme on the substrate, and colorimetric labels are detected by simply visualizing the coloured label. Further detection means are for example (micro-) calorimetry and (light)-microscopy.
  • the cells may be fixed to the support prior to being analysed further.
  • Cell fixation methods are known in the art.
  • cells of interest may be picked off the support and analysed ex situ (directly or after sub-culturing or replica plating), e.g. in PCR reactions, ELISA assays, nucleic acid hybridization, staining, etc.
  • detection methods are automated and high throughput.
  • the detection methods are thus not limited and include molecular-, histochemical-, microscopic-, enzymatic- analysis, such as for example DNA sequencing, PCR analysis, nucleic acid hybridization, immunological tests, enzymatic assays, microscopy, etc., all as known in the art and as for example described in Sambrook et al. (1989), Sambrook and Russel (2001), Ausubel et al. (1994), Brown (1998), Brock, Smith and Madigan (1984). Protocols, methods, kits and media are available commercially from a range of suppliers, such as Bio-Rad Laboratories, S.A., Sigma- Aldrich and many others. As already mentioned steps (b) and (c) may be carried out repeatedly.
  • the incubation conditions and/or the medium may be varied between repeats or different detection assays may be carried out.
  • one or more cells may be selected from the support for further analysis or growth.
  • cells with particular properties may be selected (e.g. a cell producing more folic acids than other cells, or a cell which grows faster than other cells).
  • the support comprises a grid, comprising at least about 400, 500, 800, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 10000, or more compartments per mm 2 .
  • a grid comprising at least about 400, 500, 800, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 10000, or more compartments per mm 2 .
  • the grid can be as small as 5 microns high and 5 wide (or even less) leaving compartments of as little as only 1 or 2 microns. This will allow around 10,000 compartments per mm (i.e. 1 million per cm and over 100 million on a 96-well plate- sized area).
  • the method comprises such a grid, with nutrients being supplied through the support pores from below.
  • the microorganisms are spread plated onto the support and suction or electrophoresis is used to draw the cells into the compartments. Bacterial contamination on the surface can be prevented using antibacterial surfaces, antibacterial light or other method if it is necessary to remove or kill them. It is important that the material used to create the walls or barriers does not itself act as a capillary or the test areas will flood with nutrients allowing escape of cells.
  • microorganisms e.g. bacteria
  • they can achieve colony heights of at least 1 mm or more.
  • the only way for cells in the compartment to grow is to multiply upwards, out of the compartments.
  • the cells grown out of the compartments can be detected quickly and easily, for example by laser scanning or conductivity methods as a rapid and extraordinarily high throughput system with applications in industrial microbiology, antimicrobial screening and other areas.
  • the different test areas can be supplied with different antimicrobial compounds and viability counts performed.
  • antimicrobials targeted against a heterogeneous population or a specific segment of a more complex population
  • Production strains used in the food or pharmaceutical industry should be stable and homogenous in their phenotypes. This is often problematic, as for example recombinant strains tend to lose one or more important characteristics (e.g. plasmids or transgenes integrated into the genome may be lost).
  • the above high-throughput methods can be used to screen existing production strains and/or to select for strains suitable for being used due to their high stability (i.e. have low heterogeneity, which indicates stability).
  • the method may be used to select one or more cells having improved characteristics.
  • a population of cells may be mutagenized prior to being contacted with the support using e.g. UV or gamma- radiation or by treatment with chemical mutagens, using known methods. Heterogeneity is then determined for one or more characteristics and a cell or cells selected, which have improved characteristics, e.g. higher production levels of a particular metabolite, etc.
  • Such non-GMO strains are of particular relevance for food applications considering the profound consumer resistance to GMO food stuffs.
  • Interactions between strains and/or species can monitored. For example, complex mixtures of organism are inoculated onto the support surface, followed by growth to micro-colonies. Changes in the staining of adjacent micro-colonies may be detectable at the interface between members of a different or identical species. Given that a large number of micro-colonies can be imaged in a small area it is possible to look at a very large number of interactions. Additionally, as the environment of the cells can be changed (e.g. by placing the support on a 2D gradient of peptides involved in cell -cell signaling) so the interactions between mixtures of strains can be looked at under a wide range of conditions for a novel, highly multiplexed assay.
  • strain improvement is detection of folic acid production in engineered strains or natural (or mutant) populations or by strains co-existing and interacting with other species.
  • Lactobacillus plantarum strains can be engineered with directed evolution strategies to produce high levels of the vitamine folate.
  • Folate detection can be by UV, for example by means of a fluorescent microscope adapted for UV work.
  • Folate can also be detected by the effect of the producing on nearby micro- colonies of folate-requiring indicator strains such as Lactobacillus casei.
  • the indicator strain can be distinguished from the producer strain or population in some way (e.g. fluorescent marker) or the producer strain could be selectively recovered (e.g. using an antibiotic resistance marker).
  • the two cultures could be present on the opposite side of an Anopore sheet, so that folate or other metabolites can diffuse or be actively transported from producer to reporter strain without cross-contamination of the cells. This is likely an extremely sensitive assay with great subtlety as it takes into account very complex interactions normally missed by traditional HTS approaches. Selection and recovery of such improved strains is then possible.
  • the present invention also relates to the field of microbiology.
  • a biochip comprising a porous support and a micro compartments pattern and process for the production of such biochip are provided.
  • Arrays for use in screening methods have been described in WO 03/102578.
  • the arrays seem to be made by providing wet latex to the support. In this way compartments of 0.5-1 mm can be created.
  • a disadvantage of this technique is that when applied on a porous support, the pores may become substantially blocked, which may make such array unsuitable for high throughput microbiological applications.
  • a further disadvantage is that technology does not allow a high resolution of the compartments.
  • biochip that can be used in a HTS method. It is further an aspect of the invention to provide a process for the production of such biochip. It is a specifically preferred aspect to provide a process for the production of such biochip with good porosity. It is a further specifically preferred aspect to provide a process for the production of such biochip with a high resolution micro compartment array.
  • biochip refers to a device comprising a porous support, which porous support is preferably flat, and which porous support comprises at least one surface with a micro compartments pattern or structure.
  • biochip and griddded support are in an embodiment interchangeable.
  • micro compartments pattern refers to a layer on the porous support or a top layer of the porous support which layer has a certain thickness and which layer comprises a number of compartments (preferably at least 400 compartments per mm 2 ).
  • the compartments are notches or cavities in the layer on the porous support or in an embodiment a top layer of the porous support or in a specific embodiment in the porous support itself.
  • the compartments have edges or walls surrounding the compartments, which edges or walls are formed by the layer on the porous support or a top layer of the porous support, or in a specific embodiment by the support itself (when the cavities are in the porous support itself).
  • compartments may be round, cubic or rectangular or have other geometries, and have a bottom surface provided by the support and have edges provided by the layer on the support or a top layer of the support.
  • the compartments are present on the biochip as arrays of compartments, preferably in a regular pattern with repeating equal distances between the compartments.
  • the compartments generally have micro or near-micro dimensions, i.e. the compartments generally have a height (depth) of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m, preferably 2-100 ⁇ m, and a diameter or a width and a length of about 0.5-250 ⁇ m, preferably 2-150 ⁇ m.
  • the term “grid” is interchangeable with “compartments pattern”.
  • the term “gridded support” refers to a "support with a compartments pattern", especially a "support with a micro compartments pattern”.
  • porous support refers to a substrate or support with channels as known to the person skilled in the art.
  • the porosity (including pore size) of the support is chosen for allowing compounds, such as nutrients or reporter compounds to diffuse through the pores from underneath the support ("lower surface”) to the bottom of the compartments ("upper surface” or bottom of compartment).
  • the pore size must be small enough so that the cells preferably do not pass through the pores. Therefore, in an embodiment, the porosity of the support is chosen such that once a population of cells has been contacted with one surface of the support (the "upper surface") and the opposite surface (the "lower” surface) of the support is incubated on a medium in order to allow cell growth, cell growth indeed occurs.
  • the porous support has pores with pore diameters in the range of 0.005-1 ⁇ m, preferably 0.01-0.5 ⁇ m, and a porosity of at least 10%, more preferably at least 30%.
  • These porosity values especially refer to the porosity of the areas designed for the culture and/or assay of microorganisms and not other regions of the biochip which are not necessarily porous (like holder parts, markings or other objects that may be present on the biochip).
  • the biochip according to the invention comprises a porous support, wherein the porous support comprises at least one surface coated with a coating, preferably a polymer coating, wherein the coating is patterned with a micro compartments pattern, with the support providing a bottom surface to the compartments and the coating providing edges to the compartments, and wherein the pattern comprises at least 400 compartments per mm .
  • the biochip according to the invention is obtainable by the process according to the invention.
  • the porous support comprises a rigid porous support.
  • the pores are important for allowing compounds, such as nutrients or reporter compounds to diffuse through the pores from underneath the support. At the same time, the pore size must be small enough so that the cells do not pass through the pores.
  • suitable material for making porous supports may comprise one or more materials selected from the group consisting of acrylic, acrylamide, methylene-bis-acrylamide, dimethylaminopropyl- methacrylamide, styrenemethyl methacrylate copolymers, ethylene/acrylic acid, acrylo- nitrile-butadienestyrene (ABS), ABS/poly-carbonate, ABS / polysulfone, ABS / polyvinyl chloride, ethylene propylene, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), nitrocellulose, poly- carylonitrile (PAN), polyacrylate, polycarbonate, polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene, polypropylene homopolymer, polypropylene copolymers, polystyrene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), fluorinated ethylene
  • the porous supports are made of metal oxides.
  • Such supports comprising a metal oxide, are already commercially available in the art, e.g. Anopore® inorganic supports (see e.g. WO 99/02266), which are available from Whatman.
  • Anopore is available in various pore sizes, such as 0.02 ⁇ m, 0.1 ⁇ m and 0.2 ⁇ m.
  • Appropriate metal oxide supports have a number of advantages, such as having a high pore density and narrow pore size distribution and they are virtually transparent when wet.
  • Metal oxide supports may be manufactured using methods known in the art, such as electrochemical etching of a metal sheet.
  • Metal oxides include for example oxides of tantalum, titanium, and aluminium, as well as alloys of two or more metal oxides and doped metal oxides and alloys containing metal oxides.
  • suitable supports may include minerals such as zeolites (microporous crystalline solids with well-defined structures (see Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology, eds. S.M. Auerbach et al. E-ISBN: 0824756126 Pub. Marcel Dekker), rigid fibrous supports or artificially created porous materials. Also hybrids between the materials noted may be suitable.
  • a rigid, porous support as described above, and preferably a metal oxide support, in particular an aluminium oxide support such as Anopore®, for determining the heterogeneity of a population of microorganisms of the same or of different species. Typically such a support is planar.
  • the supports do not have to have a particular size or shape, i.e. squares, circles, strips of various dimensions may be used. Particular preferred is an area equivalent to a 96- well plate footprint as commonly used in the art. Other preferred dimensions include that of a typical microscope slide.
  • the support comprises a grid (compartments pattern or compartments structure), comprising at least 400, 500, 800, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000,
  • the grid can be deposited on the porous support (e.g. Anopore) using printing, photolithography, sputtering or other methods.
  • the polymer used can be polyimide or other high precision polymer (SU8) or a photo- activated film or a metal such as gold (vide infra).
  • the grid can be as small as 5 microns high (deep) and 5 wide (or even less) leaving compartments of as little as only 1 or 2 microns. This will allow around 10,000 compartments per mm 2 (i.e. 1 million per cm 2 and over 100 million on a 96-well plate- sized area). Such a grid will essentially harbour only 1 or a few bacteria per compartment.
  • the compartments Preferably, have a height (depth) of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m, preferably 2-100 ⁇ m and a diameter or a width and length of about 0.5-250 ⁇ m, preferably 2-150 ⁇ m. This means that the coating preferably has a thickness of 1 -1000 ⁇ m.
  • compartments of approximately 20 by 20 microns (bottom surface area or compartment area dimensions), or approximately 30 by 30 microns, which results in a support having more than about 2000, respectively more than about 1000 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the compartment area (of the bottom surface) of the compartments is in the range of 1 ⁇ m - 50,000 ⁇ m , preferably 4 ⁇ m - 40,000 ⁇ m , even more preferably 20 ⁇ m - 20,000 ⁇ m .
  • the edges of the compartments have a height in the range of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m, preferably 2-100 ⁇ m.
  • the pattern comprises at least 1 ,000 compartments, more preferably 10,000 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the pattern comprises at least 100,000 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the wall thickness between two adjacent compartments, or the distance between two adjacent compartments is preferably at least 0.5 ⁇ m, more preferably at least 1 ⁇ m, even more preferably at least 2 ⁇ m. Since the walls between adjacent compartments are not necessarily perpendicular to the bottom of the compartments and may have a slope, the wall thickness herein refers to the thickness of the wall measured at the bottoms of adjacent compartments. Since the walls between compartments may be structured, the wall thickness refers to the average thickness.
  • a preferred process for the production of the biochip comprises: a. providing a porous support; b. coating at least one surface of the support with a coating, preferably a polymer coating, preferably having a thickness of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m; d. arranging between the coated surface and an ion etching device, preferably a reactive ion etching device (RIE), a shadow mask with a predetermined hole pattern; and e. ion etching at least part of the coating such that a patterned coating with micro compartments is obtained.
  • RIE reactive ion etching device
  • the porous support has been described above.
  • the process of coating at least one surface of the support with a coating having a thickness of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m, preferably 2- 100 ⁇ m, can be performed with techniques known in the art.
  • the coating is a polymer, which is provided to the porous support.
  • Such coating may be bonded to the porous support by using heat and pressure or may be glued to the support, with glues known to the person skilled in the art.
  • the coating comprises one or more materials selected from the group consisting of Teflon, Polyester, polyimide, SU8, thermoplastic polymer such as PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate), POM (polyoxymethylene), PC (polycarbonate), PCDF (polychlorinated dibenzofuran) and PSU (polysulfone), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), PVC, (polyvinyl chloride), polypropylene, polyethylene, acrylic, celluloid, polystyrene cellulose acetate, rubber and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).
  • non-polymeric materials may also be suitable, such as metals or other materials.
  • the polymer coating or other material comprises a laminate.
  • Such laminate preferably includes an adhesion layer and a polymer layer.
  • the laminate may be arranged to the porous support by adhering the adhesion layer to the support. In this way a stack is obtained comprising a porous support, an adhesion layer and a polymer layer, wherein the latter two layers are comprised in the laminate.
  • the micro compartments pattern is than provided in the laminate (vide infra).
  • the coating layer acts as a physical barrier to the spread of microorganisms and as such is effectively bond to the porous support.
  • the coating layer is preferably arranged on the support in such a way that no gaps are created (i.e. gaps between compartments or gaps between coating layer and porous support), or only gaps are created smaller than about 0.2 ⁇ m.
  • gaps larger than 0.2 ⁇ m are absent. Gaps that lead to a break in the continuity of a barrier between two compartments or by poor adhesion to the porous support are avoided or may only be present when smaller than about 0.2 ⁇ m.
  • the layer thickness of the coating layer is chosen that at an appropriate thickness to create a barrier of the right height.
  • the coating layer is preferably not toxic or detrimental to microbial culture or related assays such as determination of the activity of a microbial enzyme.
  • the coating layer is sterilisable along with the rest of the chip by at least one of a heat, a steam (autoclaving), an irradiation or a chemical sterilization method. Such sterilization methods are known in the art.
  • the coating layer is removable from specific areas (for forming the growth compartments of the micro compartments pattern) of the coating layer by the process of the invention, especially etching such as reactive ion etching (RIE).
  • RIE reactive ion etching
  • the coating layer is durable (for instance not degraded by micro organisms, not degraded by commonly used chemicals (such as ethanol, dimethylformamide, dimethylosulfoxime, methanol, acids, alkaline reagents and ideally other solvents including chloroform and acetone), not degradable by day light or microbial action, and not degrading during a reasonable storage period of, for instance, about several years.
  • commonly used chemicals such as ethanol, dimethylformamide, dimethylosulfoxime, methanol, acids, alkaline reagents and ideally other solvents including chloroform and acetone
  • the coating layer has a relatively low adhesion for micro organisms so that inoculations do not adhere to the walls (where they may be unculturable or promote contamination between compartments. It may further be preferable that the coating layer generates a relatively low signal in terms of background for a predetermined detection method, particularly does not show autofluorescence or only shows weak autofluorescence under irradiation with for instance UV light. It may further be desirable that the physical properties (especially hydrophobicity) should reduce the ability of the compartments to act as capillaries (if they do, they will fill with culture media transforming the invention from culture on a solid support to a form of liquid culture).
  • the ion etching method according to the process of the invention does not imply the use of laminates comprising an adhesion layer and a photoresist layer (i.e. a photo resist polymer for use in photolithography), since the method does not use photolithography, it appear that such laminates may advantageously be applied in the process of the invention.
  • the polymer coating for use in the process of the invention comprises a dry film photopolymer resist.
  • the ion etching technique used in the process of the present invention advantageously does not provide blocked pores.
  • the support porosity of the support provided with a micro compartments pattern is preferably > 90% of the initial support, not yet provided with the micro compartments pattern. Even more preferably, the support porosity of the support provided with a micro compartments pattern is > 95%, preferably > 99%, of the initial support, not yet provided with the micro compartments pattern.
  • the biochip can be placed on a filter paper disk on a sintered glass support. Excess area around the chip is blocked with for instance parafilm (so air flow is through chip). Then, drops of water are dripped on the biochip. By applying vacuum to the biochip water may be pulled through the biochip.
  • Another method is to spread the upper surface of the biochip with a microorganism such as Lactobacillus plantarum WCFSl, with for instance an average of 100 colony forming units per compartment. Medium below the biochip is stained with a dye, for instance with 10 micromolar Syto9 dye (Invitrogen).
  • a biochip wherein > 90%, preferably > 95%, even more preferably > 98%, yet even more preferably > 99% of the micro compartments facilitate growth of microorganisms within the compartments.
  • a person skilled can choose a microorganism, for instance mentioned above, and grow the microorganism in the micro compartments, as for instance described above.
  • the number of compartments that show growth or staining should be at least 90 % of the compartments.
  • the ion etching technique for etching away the polymer advantageously provides a micro compartments pattern in the coating without substantially affecting the adhesion of the polymer coating. It appears that when photolithographic etching techniques (photolithography) are used, the polymer coating after processing does not adhere well, whereas the polymer coating when using the process of the invention does adhere well after processing.
  • Especially suitable polymer coatings for use in the process of the invention comprise laminar plates that are designed to be used as dry film photoresists such as ordyl dry film photoresists from Tokyo OHKA Industrial or Elga Europe, for instance Ordyl SY 300 (like 314).
  • the coating has a coating thickness of about 1 -1000 ⁇ m.
  • laminar 5000 dry film photopolymers of Eternal such as Laminar 5025, 5032, 5038, 5050 and 5075 have a coating or layer thickness of about 25-75 ⁇ m.
  • a ion etching device is provided and between the coated surface and the ion etching device a shadow mask with a predetermined hole pattern is arranged.
  • at least part of the coating preferably a polymer coating, is ion etched such that a patterned coating with micro compartments is obtained.
  • Such techniques are known in the art.
  • RIE reactive ion etching
  • IBE reactive ion etching
  • RIE reactive ion etching
  • compartments are provided wherein the support provides a bottom surface to the compartments and the coating provides edges to the compartments. Therefore, the invention provides highly miniaturized flow and growth chambers for microbial culture and other biochips at relatively low cost based structures built onto the porous support, especially anopore.
  • the shadow mask is arranged to provide a patterned polymer comprising at least 400 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the shadow mask is arranged to provide a patterned polymer with compartment areas in the range of 20 ⁇ m 2 - 20,000 ⁇ m 2 .
  • the shadow mask is arranged to provide a patterned polymer with wall thicknesses between adjacent compartments of at least 0.5 ⁇ m, more preferably at least 1 ⁇ m, even more preferably at least 2 ⁇ m.
  • the shadow mask is designed to provide such patterns, respectively, by ion etching techniques, especially deep reactive ion etching techniques, preferably according to the process of the invention.
  • RIE reactive ion etching device
  • a biochip comprising a porous support, wherein the porous support comprises at least one surface coated with a metal coating, wherein the metal coating is patterned with a micro compartments pattern, with the support providing a bottom surface to the compartments and the metal coating providing edges to the compartments, and wherein the pattern comprises at least 400 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the term “metal” and “coating” also refer to a combination of two or more metals and a combination of two or more coatings, respectively.
  • a metal that can be used is for instance Au (gold), Pt (platinum) and Ti (titanium). Instead of a metal, also other materials may be applied, such as for instance alloys, metal nitrides or materials, etc.
  • the support comprises silicon, especially porous silicon, silicon nitride or silicon dioxide.
  • Porous silicon substrates can be provided in an embodiment by etching one or both sides of a silicon substrate (including silicon nitride or silicon dioxide) resulting in compartmented structures with underlying thinner parts that can be made porous in a third etching step, for instance an electrochemical etch step.
  • RIE reactive ion etching device
  • a porous support may be provided wherein the compartments are processed into the support, thus without the use of the polymer or a metal coating layer.
  • the compartments are integrated into the porous support (in fact porous made support), and the compartment wall(s) are provided by the support.
  • a biochip comprising a porous support, wherein the porous support is patterned with a micro compartments pattern, with the support providing edges to the compartments, and wherein the pattern comprises at least 400 compartments per mm 2 .
  • the bottom surface area of the compartments is in the range of 20 ⁇ m 2 - 20,000 ⁇ m 2 and preferably the edges of the compartments have a height in the range of 0.2-1000 ⁇ m.
  • silicon, silica and silicon nitride supports such as wafers, although also other materials may be used as support.
  • the porous support may thus only be porous below the compartments. Further, the porosity may be introduced to the support before or after providing the compartments.
  • the support comprises a grid (compartments pattern or compartments structure), comprising at least 400, preferably 500, more preferably 800, even more preferably 1000, yet even more preferably 2000, more preferentially 4000, even more preferentially 8000, yet even more preferentially 10000, or more (especially 100000) compartments per mm 2 .
  • a grid comprising at least 400, preferably 500, more preferably 800, even more preferably 1000, yet even more preferably 2000, more preferentially 4000, even more preferentially 8000, yet even more preferentially 10000, or more (especially 100000) compartments per mm 2 .
  • biochip of the invention is obtainable by the processes described according to the invention. Description of the Figures
  • Figure 1 shows a micro-colony of E. coli, which has only undergone 2-3 rounds of cell division and already shows heterogeneity. Stain used is Syto9.
  • Figure 2 shows three micro-colonies of Lactobacillus plantarum, showing heterogeneity in cell length.
  • Figure 3 shows the statistical analysis of heterogeneity in cell length of three Lactobacillus plantarum colonies.
  • Figure 4 shows two micro-colonies, A and B, wherein colony B shows a bias in staining at the interface with colony A. Repeated detection of such staining suggests that the colonies interact indirectly. Treatment with DNAse can be used to determine whether the interaction involves nucleic acids.
  • FIG. 5 shows a Scanning Electron Microscopy picture of a single compartment of an Anopore chip showing bacterial growth.
  • Inset shows expanded view of central region with individual bacteria visible.
  • Figure 6a shows a fluorescence microscopy picture of an Anopore chip showing bacterial growth (white areas) separated by the walls formed by the Laminar 5000 polymer. All compartments are c. 100 microns across.
  • Expanded view figure 6b shows growth in compartments 1-3 (in some cases individual bacteria can be resolved from the population) whilst compartment 4 did not support growth.
  • Figures 7a-c schematically depict side and top views of a biochip 5 according to the invention.
  • Biochip 5 may have a width bl, for instance 7.5 mm and a length Ll of 35 mm.
  • FIG. 7a shows a support 10, which is at least partially porous (i.e. porous regions), with (polymer) coating 20 and arranged above (or on top of polymer coating 20) a shadow mask 30, with predetermined openings 31, which are arranged to provide a patterned (polymer) coating according to the invention.
  • the shadow mask 30 is arranged between an ion etching device (not shown) arranged to generate ions for etching polymer coating 20 (or a metal or other material) and polymer coating 20 (or a metal or other material).
  • the top of material 20 is indicated with reference number 33. This top 33 is also indicated as first surface or top surface of biochip 5.
  • the bottom surface of second surface of biochip 5 is indicated with reference number 11.
  • Support 10 may for instance be anopore.
  • RIE ion etching process
  • biochip 5 is obtained, as shown in figures Ib and Ic.
  • coating 20 contains compartments 25, which have a bottom surface 21a formed by substrate 10 and which have side walls formed by coating 20.
  • the compartments comprise a top opening, due to the etching process, as is clear from the figures.
  • the interface between support 10 and coating 20 is indicated with reference number 21. This interface 21 will also provide the bottom surface 21 a to the compartments 25, although it is not excluded that during RIE processing, also a top layer of anopore is etched away.
  • height hi of compartments 25 is identical or substantially identical to the height of coating 20. Height hi is for instance 15 ⁇ m.
  • the compartment area is the area of compartments 25 provided by bottom surface 21a, which is the area of compartments 25 enclosed by the compartment walls (i.e. coating 20). Distances between adjacent compartments 25 are indicated with reference symbol d2 and may be for instance 1 ⁇ m (this is also indicated with barrier width). Diffusion 13 of micro organisms is prevented by using coatings 20 that adhere well to support 10. Diffusion 12 of nutrients from the bottom surface to the top surface of support 10 is possible due to the porosity of support 10.
  • Figure 7c shows compartments 25 with a square bottom surface (see also figures 2a-2), but rectangular, oval, round or other shaped compartments may also be applied.
  • the support 10 is porous. This means that support 10 is either provided as porous material, such as anopore, or is made porous after providing the grid structure with compartments 25. For instance, support 10 may be etched at least at one or more positions where the thickness of the support 10 and coating between the first surface 33 and a second surface 11 opposite of the first surface 33 has been reduced due to the presence of one or more micro compartments 25, thereby providing an at least partial porous support (at positions 51 below such compartments 25).
  • Support 10 is at least porous below compartments 25.
  • At least the regions below compartments 25 are porous and have a porosity as described above.
  • Coating 20 may be a polymer as described above, or a laminate like a dry film photoresist. However, herein coating 20 may also comprise a metal or other material.
  • Figures 8a-b show SEM measurements of biochips made according to example 8.
  • square compartments 25 are provided into coating 20, the coating 20 providing side walls (with wall thickness d2) and the support 10 providing a bottom surface 21a, with a top opening.
  • the compartments 25 are processed into the support 10 itself.
  • material 20 and support 10 are than one material, such as a silicon dioxide wafer.
  • support 10/20 is etched to provide compartments 25. Since the support 10/20 may not be porous before providing the grid structure or compartment structure, a further etching to provide porosity may be applied. At least at one or more positions 51 where the thickness (hl+hl) of the support between the first surface 33 and a second surface 11 opposite of the first surface 33 has been reduced due to the presence of one or more micro compartments 25, thereby providing an at least partial porous support, which is indicated with regions 51.
  • the phrase "providing a porous support” includes the situation wherein a non-porous or substantially non-porous support is provided, and after (or during) providing the compartment structure, the support is made porous, at least at those positions below compartments 25, as indicated in the figures.
  • the porosity is as described above.
  • Example 1 heterogeneity in cell size and nucleic acid distribution Material and Methods
  • Escherichia coli strain 2613 was inoculated on sterile Anopore (0.2 micron pore size, 60 microns thick, 8 mm x 36 mm strips) at a density of 2000 cells per mm 2 of area.
  • the strip was incubated at 37 0 C for 2 hours by placing it on 2TY agar to allow formation of micro-colonies on the upper surface of the Anopore by division of cells from the inoculum.
  • the Anopore was then moved to a microscope slide covered in a thin film of solidified low-melting-point agar containing the nucleic acid-binding dye Syto9 (Invitrogen). This method allowed rapid staining of the cells on the Anopore with minimal disturbance of the cells on the surface by the dye passing upwards though the pores and entering the cells.
  • the micro-colonies are imaged by means of a BX41 fluorescent microscope equipped with Fluorotar lenses (Olympus, x50 objective used). Data was captured using a Kappa CCD camera.
  • the anopore was incubated at 37 0 C for 5 hours on MRS agar under anaerobic conditions to allow formation of micro-colonies.
  • Electron microscopy was used to image the resulting micro-colonies directly on the anopore surface (Fig. 2).
  • Colony 1 is to the right in Fig. B, Colony 2 is central and Colony 3 is to the left.
  • the length of the cells in each of three distinctly separated micro-colonies was calculated using the cell-analysis program ImageJ (NIH).
  • NASH cell-analysis program
  • repeated measurements of a randomly chosen cell were made to assess the variability of the measuring technique.
  • the two colonies are Enterobacter cloacae grown on Anopore® for 4 hours on Mueller-Hinton agar at 37 0 C then stained from below using a mixture of Syto9 dye and Hexidium Iodide.
  • the inoculum was stressed by its environment prior to inoculation on Anopore®, normally Hexidium Iodide penetrates this species poorly but here heterogeneity has been observed with the 2-dye system. In this case no bias indicating any interaction was observed.
  • Example 4 - gridded support
  • Anopore Growth compartments were created on Anopore using a photosensitive (photoresist) film. Initially, the film (Laminar 5000, Shipley UK) was used to laminate the upper surface of the Anopore. Photolithographic techniques were then employed, using a series of masks, to direct the selective and permanent polymerisation of the photoresist and the removal of unpolymerised material (Shipley Laminar 5000 technical data sheet PI 102701). The end result was an Anopore chip. A single chip was based around a 36 x 8 mm strip of anopore to create over 20,000 growth compartments of c. 100 microns across.
  • washes methanol, ethanol, acetone and sterile water
  • washes methanol, ethanol, acetone and sterile water
  • an Anopore chip was placed in an agar plate of MRS medium (Oxoid) and spread plate with cells of Lactobacillus plantarum strain WCFSl at an average density of 20 cells per compartment. Chips were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 10 hours at 37 0 C then stained with Syto9 dye and imaged as described previously, or by scanning electron microscopy.
  • MRS medium Oxoid
  • WCFSl Lactobacillus plantarum strain
  • Figs 5 and 6 Examples of growth in compartments are shown in Figs 5 and 6. Many compartments now contained thousands to tens of thousands of cells, indicating that multiplication of the inoculum has occurred. The walls segregate the cells in different compartments (Fig 6) creating a highly multiplexed testing and screening environment. Example 5 - Heterogeneity of respiratory metabolism
  • a cellular response to oxygen or to another terminal electron acceptor is screened for using the method according to the invention.
  • aspects of cellular energy metabolism and transduction are screened for.
  • gas phase and medium e.g. liquid phase
  • compounds include electron acceptors, carbon and nitrogen sources, nutrients, waste products, and specific reagents for heterogeneity assays.
  • One approach herein is the cultivation of yeast or bacteria in the presence of oxygen used in aerobic respiration or an anaerobic environment in which fermentative growth is likely, or any other compound that can be administered via the gas phase.
  • oxygen used in aerobic respiration or an anaerobic environment in which fermentative growth is likely, or any other compound that can be administered via the gas phase.
  • other electron acceptors are used in place of oxygen - these may be in gas and/or liquid phase as appropriate.
  • a redox dye such as 5-cyano-2, 3-ditoyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC from Polysciences Inc. PA, USA).
  • CTC 5-cyano-2, 3-ditoyl tetrazolium chloride
  • the oxidized form is colourless and the reduced fluorescent form (CTC-formazin) is insoluble and accumulated intracellularly.
  • a reversible dye system, or other method of detection e.g. the difference between aerobic and fermentative growth deduced from metabolites, e.g. by near infra red spectroscopy, may be used.
  • fluorogenic or fluorescent dyes examples include fluorescein 5 (and 6) carbofluorecein (BCECF), 5 (and 6) carboxyfluorecein succinimidyl ester (cFSE), RedoxSensor Red CC-I and oxocarbocyanine dyes (e.g. DiOC2).
  • fluorescein 5 (and 6) carbofluorecein (BCECF) 5 (and 6) carboxyfluorecein succinimidyl ester (cFSE), RedoxSensor Red CC-I and oxocarbocyanine dyes (e.g. DiOC2).
  • non-fluorescent redox dyes such as 2-(p-iodophenyl)-5- phenyltetrazolium chloride (INT) is also possible given the translucent nature of Anopore allows transmission microscopy. It may be advantageous to combine this with other stains or counter-stains such as DAPI for detection of all cells by their nucleic acid content
  • respiration status of each cell within a microcolony is assessed and analyzed either at the level of the differences between cells in the same microcolony or between microcolonies, the interaction between adjacent cells. This information is used to assess the heterogeneity of a population.
  • This method allows cell-by-cell assessment of closely related cells (with a common ancestor within the microcolony) in a homogenous environment where changes in the gas phase are experienced extremely rapidly. This is a significant advantage over other known methods when combined with the potential for high throughput screening for microcolonies exhibiting desired properties.
  • FACS fluorescence activated cell sorter
  • FACS fluorescence activated cell sorter
  • the stimulation or inhibition of respiration by cellxell contacts within the same species or in consortia of different species can also be assessed at high-throughput using this method.
  • Respiratory growth has different properties from fermentative (anaerobic) growth.
  • yeast respiratory growth is better for biomass or protein production whilst many metabolites of commercial value are produced by fermentation. Therefore, one use of this invention is to study the heterogeneity of the switch between these two forms which may be usable as a screening method for cells that are more homogenous (and stable) with one form of metabolism or switch more effectively or synchronously between the two.
  • Example 6 Statistical analysis of heterogeneity data
  • the statistical interpretation of the arrays can be used to deduce interactions between organisms. It is expected that a random distribution of organisms will be inoculated onto the porous surface that forms the culture area.
  • the growth of inoculated cells into a distribution of microcolonies is expected to comply with a definable statistical model that may be a characteristic of the organism or strain. For examples, all or a random subset of cells will form microcolonies. Another example, one of a common and definable but non-random pattern of growth is if growth is cell density dependent.
  • Deviations from the expected model may occur for a number of reasons, including the situation when there is interaction between two microorganisms or strains.
  • the parameter or parameters used to detect this could be, for example, microcolony size or shape or the production and/or inhibition of a secreted metabolite or another property of the cells or the microcolonies.
  • These biases that may indicate interaction can be analyzed in a number of ways. For example, by creating a probability map of the array using the appropriate parameters (colony presence or size, shape etc.) and comparing the maps of two organisms or strains. A number of methods, for example dividing the growth area into sectors and comparing the ratio of the two organisms or strains, can be used to quantify and analyze interactions.
  • Such statistical programs as SPSS (SPSS Inc. USA) are suitable for mapping or analyzing such data.
  • Anopore Growth compartments were created on Anopore using a photosensitive (photoresist) film. Initially, the film (Laminar 5000, Shipley UK) was used to laminate the upper surface of the Anopore. Photolithographic techniques were then employed, using a series of masks, to direct the selective and permanent polymerisation of the photoresist and the removal of unpolymerised material (Shipley Laminar 5000 technical data sheet PI 102701). The end result was an Anopore chip. A single chip was based around a 36 x 8 mm strip of anopore to create over 20,000 growth compartments of c. 100 microns across.
  • washes methanol, ethanol, acetone and sterile water
  • washes methanol, ethanol, acetone and sterile water
  • an Anopore chip was placed in an agar plate of MRS medium (Oxoid) and spread plate with cells of Lactobacillus plantarum strain WCFSl at an average density of 20 cells per compartment. Chips were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 10 hours at 37 0 C then stained with Syto9 dye and imaged as described previously, or by scanning electron microscopy.
  • MRS medium Oxoid
  • WCFSl Lactobacillus plantarum strain
  • Example 8 - gridded support produced with RIE
  • a microbial culture biochip was engineered that maintains and improves the advantages of separation of organism on a planar surface, but which addresses many of the limitations of the Petri dish.
  • the material chosen was a highly porous ceramic (Anopore).
  • Anopore has previously been shown to be a good growth and imaging support for bacteria and fungi.
  • the limited change in volume of Anopore with wetting or temperature changes is an additional advantage in micro-engineering this material.
  • the micro engineering of Anopore to create channels for molecular analysis and growth compartments with a density of 200 cm "2 is known.
  • the microbial culture possibilities is extended with a novel approach that creates culture areas of up to or mmoorree tthhaann 335500,,000000 ccmm "" ((ii..ee.. uupp ttoo oorr i more than 3500 mm " ) a number highly appropriate for HTS and other applications.
  • a substrate holder to fix the substrates In order to handle the fragile anopore substrates in the clean room equipment, a substrate holder to fix the substrates is used.
  • a P-type ⁇ 1 - 0-0> silicon wafer was covered with 200 nm silicon nitride.
  • a pattern with the dimensions of the anopore substrates was etched in the silicon nitride on the front side of the wafer with Electrotech PF340 reactive ion etcher (3 min at 10 mTorr, 75 W, 25 seem CHF 3 /5 seem O 2 ), using a usual photolithography process. After stripping the photoresist in an oxygen plasma, the cavities were etched in KOH (1 hour in 25% KOH at 75 0 C) until 55 ⁇ m depth.
  • Anopore strips (35x7.5 mm , 60 ⁇ m thick, pore size c. 0.2 ⁇ m) were put in the substrate holder and cleaned with oxygen plasma using an Electrotech PF340 reactive ion etcher (5 min at 10 mTorr, 10OW, 20 seem O 2 ).
  • Ordyl 314 foil (supplier Elga Europe S.r.l., Milano; http://www.elgaeurope.it/) was used to laminate the entire upper surface of Anopore strips using a heated roller
  • Ordyl SY 314 belongs to the Ordyl SY 300 series, which laminates may be used in the invention.
  • Ordyl SY 300 is a solvent type permanent dry film for special MEMS applications. It is a negative-working photopolymer and is designed to be applied with hot roll lamination. Ordyl SY 300 is capable of resolving patterns down to 40 ⁇ m. Ordyl SY 300 coatings can be processed with CFC free chemicals.
  • Ordyl SY 300 shows compatibility with biological fluids. It has a strong adhesion to different materials (glass, silicon, epoxy resin, polymers, etc). It has a resist thickness of 15-50 ⁇ m.
  • Photolithography was done by spinning HDMS adhesion promoter for 20 sec 4000 rpm and subsequently 20 sec 4000 rpm OiR908-17 resist on the front side of the silicon wafer.
  • EVG620 Electrovision
  • Mask aligner developing and then baking for 5 min at 90 0 C on a hot plate.
  • DRIE of the compartments was done using an AdixenlOOSE I-speeder deep Si etcher for 12 minutes by a Bosch process.
  • the backside of the mask was locally etched with KOH (5 hour 20 min in 25% KOH at 75 0 C) with a structured silicon nitride layer as mask, until a 20 ⁇ m thick membrane with precisely defined holes resulted.
  • the silicon nitride mask was stripped in HF.
  • a protective layer of aluminium oxide 150 nm thick was sputtered to reduce etching and back-sputtering of the mask during its use.
  • Reactive ion etching of laminated Anopore The silicon shadow mask was aligned with a substrate holder containing 16 laminated strips of Anopore and etched with PlasmaTherm 790: parallel plate reactive ion etcher (20 mTorr, 500W, 40/4 seem O2 / CHF 3 ) for 25 min (5 treatments of 5 min, with intervals of 3 min to cool-down). Next the anopore chips were cut out of the substrate holder by means of a scalpel. After treatment, the completed chips were washed and sterilized; twice in distilled water and twice in 96% (v/v) ethanol and stored in sterile tubes ready for use.
  • Chips were imaged directly (without immersion oil or cover-slip) using an Olympus BX41 epifluorescence microscope equipped with
  • Image capture used a Kappa CCD camera (Kappa, Germany). TIFF files of 8-bit images were analysed quantitatively using ImageJ software to implement background correction, median filtration, conversion to a binary image and measurement of colony or cell size. Images were merged and displayed using Photoshop 8.0 CS (Adobe).
  • RIE reactive ion etching
  • the porosity of the laminated and etched Anopore or other porous substrate is close to the porosity of Anopore that has never been laminated (i.e. the porosity under the compartments is > 90 % of the original porosity), for instance tested by dye penetration for example, using a fluorogenic dye such as Syto 9 added from below to stain organisms spread but not grown on the upper surface or by the growth test, wherein a high percentage of the intended compartments (> 90 %) should be sufficiently porous to support microbial growth at an acceptable rate.
  • a fluorogenic dye such as Syto 9 added from below to stain organisms spread but not grown on the upper surface or by the growth test, wherein a high percentage of the intended compartments (> 90 %) should be sufficiently porous to support microbial growth at an acceptable rate.
  • Anopore is a rigid and exceptionally porous (such as 2 x 109 pores cm "2 , pore diameter of 0.2 ⁇ m) inorganic, planar material.
  • Anopore is extremely flat with low background fluorescence and is translucent when wet: making it appropriate as a cellular imaging substrate and also amenable for micro-engineering.
  • the chip formats are flexible, permit rapid exchange of nutrients and other materials through the pores and do not desiccate.
  • the planar surface permits imaging by fluorescence microscopy and other techniques. Microbial culture is possible on strips of this ceramic with the nutrients supplied from beneath the Anopore to organisms on the upper surface. Growth can be monitored at the single cell and microcolony level using a variety of (fluorescence) microscopy techniques.
  • the process and product of the invention can be applied in a number of technical fields. It is a relatively low cost method, which is further flexible in terms of material choice and a relatively simple process compared to other patterning techniques. Specific applications include:
  • HTS/HCS creation of highly-multiplexed screening formats for cellular assays - for example industrial strain improvement or screening for antimicrobials.
  • Environmental monitoring - Detection of organisms for example in food processing or pharmaceutical or cosmetic manufacture. Detection and enumeration or difficult to culture organisms.
  • Anopore Based Assays or Devices e.g. Modification of anopore into multiwell plates and molecular bioassay chips (e.g. channelling reaction components through a particular section of anopore).
  • anopore is a popular material in nanotechnology.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne le domaine de la microbiologie, notamment, une méthode particulièrement efficace en matière de criblage à rendement élevé. Ladite invention a encore plus spécifiquement pour objet une méthode à rendement élevé de détermination de l'hétérogénéité ou d'interactions de micro-organismes.
PCT/NL2006/050087 2005-04-18 2006-04-18 Methode de criblage a rendement eleve pour l'evaluation de l'heterogeneite de micro-organismes Ceased WO2006112713A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/918,612 US20100021959A1 (en) 2005-04-18 2006-04-18 High Throughput Screening Method for Assessing Heterogeneity of Microorganisms
EP06733066A EP1871893A2 (fr) 2005-04-18 2006-04-18 Méthode de criblage à haut débit pour évaluer l'hétérogénéité de microorganismes

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP05103080.7 2005-04-18
EP05103080 2005-04-18
US69650705P 2005-07-06 2005-07-06
US60/696,507 2005-07-06
PCT/NL2006/050078 WO2006112709A2 (fr) 2005-04-18 2006-04-10 Biopuce et son procede de production
NLPCT/NL2006/050078 2006-04-10

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006112713A2 true WO2006112713A2 (fr) 2006-10-26
WO2006112713A3 WO2006112713A3 (fr) 2007-05-10

Family

ID=37115584

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/NL2006/050087 Ceased WO2006112713A2 (fr) 2005-04-18 2006-04-18 Methode de criblage a rendement eleve pour l'evaluation de l'heterogeneite de micro-organismes

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2006112713A2 (fr)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008153387A1 (fr) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Nizo Food Research B.V. Procédé de fabrication à haut débit de fromage
WO2009078724A1 (fr) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Stichting Top Institute Food And Nutrition Procédé de prélèvement d'une pluralité d'échantillons
GB2476663A (en) * 2009-12-31 2011-07-06 Blood Analysis Ltd Detection of microorganisms
CN102735517A (zh) * 2012-06-29 2012-10-17 成都欧林生物科技股份有限公司 一种b型流感嗜血杆菌发酵液的细菌荚膜染色方法
EP2688395A4 (fr) * 2011-03-22 2014-05-14 Pioneer Hi Bred Int Appareils et procédés pour évaluer et trier du pollen et des végétaux
US8978297B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2015-03-17 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Method and apparatus of high-throughput pollen extraction, counting, and use of counted pollen for characterizing a plant
CN111139281A (zh) * 2020-01-13 2020-05-12 华南农业大学 一种基于微流控可视化技术精确测定特殊状态菌及其分选富集的方法
WO2021198443A1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-07 Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives Procédé de caractérisation de microorganismes par imagerie en transmission

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4528269A (en) * 1980-04-14 1985-07-09 The State Of Oregon By And Through The Oregon State Board Of Higher Education On Behalf Of Oregon State University Method for producing single and/or mixed strain concentrates of bacteria
DE10145568A1 (de) * 2001-09-14 2003-04-03 Knoell Hans Forschung Ev Verfahren zur Kultivierung und Analyse mikrobieller Einzelzellkulturen
JP2005528102A (ja) * 2002-06-03 2005-09-22 パムジーン ビー．ブイ． 多用途の生存マイクロアレイを用いる、細胞に基づく高処理量アッセイのための方法

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008153387A1 (fr) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Nizo Food Research B.V. Procédé de fabrication à haut débit de fromage
US8978297B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2015-03-17 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Method and apparatus of high-throughput pollen extraction, counting, and use of counted pollen for characterizing a plant
WO2009078724A1 (fr) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Stichting Top Institute Food And Nutrition Procédé de prélèvement d'une pluralité d'échantillons
GB2476663A (en) * 2009-12-31 2011-07-06 Blood Analysis Ltd Detection of microorganisms
EP2688395A4 (fr) * 2011-03-22 2014-05-14 Pioneer Hi Bred Int Appareils et procédés pour évaluer et trier du pollen et des végétaux
CN102735517A (zh) * 2012-06-29 2012-10-17 成都欧林生物科技股份有限公司 一种b型流感嗜血杆菌发酵液的细菌荚膜染色方法
CN111139281A (zh) * 2020-01-13 2020-05-12 华南农业大学 一种基于微流控可视化技术精确测定特殊状态菌及其分选富集的方法
WO2021198443A1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-07 Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives Procédé de caractérisation de microorganismes par imagerie en transmission
FR3108983A1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-08 Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives Procédé de caractérisation de microorganismes par imagerie en transmission

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006112713A3 (fr) 2007-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100021959A1 (en) High Throughput Screening Method for Assessing Heterogeneity of Microorganisms
US12188075B2 (en) High resolution systems, kits, apparatus, and methods for screening microorganisms and other high throughput microbiology applications
US11104939B2 (en) High resolution systems, kits, apparatus, and methods for high throughput microbiology applications
US10677793B2 (en) High resolution systems, kits, apparatus, and methods using lateral flow for high throughput microbiology applications
AU2003242613B2 (en) High throughput cellular response assay using microarrays
US6448387B1 (en) Polymeric arrays adapted for high expressing polynucleotides
CA3041109A1 (fr) Systemes, kits, appareil et procedes a haute resolution pour le criblage de micro-organismes et autres applications de microbiologie a haut rendement
WO2006112713A2 (fr) Methode de criblage a rendement eleve pour l'evaluation de l'heterogeneite de micro-organismes
AU2017335897A1 (en) High resolution systems, kits, apparatus, and methods for bacterial community relationship determination and other high throughput microbiology applications
CN110049817B (zh) 将材料从第一微加工装置转移到第二微加工装置的方法、和用于其的试剂盒
US20230279514A1 (en) Devices that include a dried reagent:substrate complex and methods for generating such complexes and devices
US20200263227A1 (en) High resolution systems, kits, apparatus, and methods using magnetic beads for high throughput microbiology applications
EP3478415A1 (fr) Systèmes à haute résolution, trousses, appareil, et procédés utilisant des stratégies de supports combinatoires pour des applications de microbiologie à débit élevé.
JP2022525087A (ja) 高密度増殖プラットフォーム上の微生物分離株の選択方法
EP4186981A1 (fr) Isolation et manipulation directes parallèles d'acide nucléique à partir de cellules cultivées dans des gouttelettes de nanolitre
WO2006022293A1 (fr) Procédé de criblage à l’aide d’un réseau de microchambres et appareil de criblage
JP2023500796A (ja) 嫌気性条件下で細胞の代謝活性をモニターするためのレゾルフィンの使用
Sharma RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MICROBIAL REPORT CELL GENETIC TECHNIQUE AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN CELL ARRAYS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006733066

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 06733066

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2006733066

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 11918612

Country of ref document: US