[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2005032084A1 - Egalisation avec auto-adaptation pour systemes de communication - Google Patents

Egalisation avec auto-adaptation pour systemes de communication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005032084A1
WO2005032084A1 PCT/GB2004/004048 GB2004004048W WO2005032084A1 WO 2005032084 A1 WO2005032084 A1 WO 2005032084A1 GB 2004004048 W GB2004004048 W GB 2004004048W WO 2005032084 A1 WO2005032084 A1 WO 2005032084A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
feedback
control signal
transmitting
transmitter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/GB2004/004048
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David Srodzinski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Elonics Ltd
Original Assignee
Elonics Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Elonics Ltd filed Critical Elonics Ltd
Publication of WO2005032084A1 publication Critical patent/WO2005032084A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00—Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03343—Arrangements at the transmitter end
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00—Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L2025/03777—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference characterised by the signalling
    • H04L2025/03802—Signalling on the reverse channel

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of communication systems. More particularly, this invention relates to communication systems that employ equalisation in order to overcome signal degradation mechanism within the system and in so doing can improve some performance metric of the system.
  • State-of-the-art electronic self-adapting equalisation schemes for communications systems rely on automatically adapting some equalisation element in or near to the receiver using decision feedback equalisation (DFE) .
  • DFE decision feedback equalisation
  • US Patent No. US 4,969,162 entitled “Polled data network auto-equalizer system and method” suggests an alternative arrangement whereby the equalisation can be done in the transmitter, based on a signal quality measuring function in an adjacent receiver in a two-way communications system.
  • This transmitter based equalisation scheme is signal aware and, by learning about the signal degradation mechanisms through training, more cost effective equalisation can be done without requiring analog to digital conversion or complex simpler signal processing within the receiver. Also the equalisation is placed before the sensitive receiver input stage, allowing higher performance to be attained.
  • this scheme has two major drawbacks. In the first instance it requires a training sequence to periodically train the link and in order to do this the normally transmitted data must be periodically interrupted. In "always on” services this is not acceptable.
  • Reciprocity can be employed when the distortion in the bi-directional signals are assumed to be substantially identical for signals travelling in either direction. Reciprocity then allows the near-end receiver to adjust the near-end transmitter and likewise ⁇ the far-end receiver and transmitter.
  • reciprocity cannot be solely relied upon, as the transmission and reception paths are not necessarily the same.
  • US Patent No. US 3,593,142 entitled “Digital Transmission system employing band limited analog medium with adaptive equalizer at transmitter” discloses a scheme wherein the near end receiver trains the far end transmitter and the far end receiver trains the near end transmitter, and in doing so no reciprocity is assumed or exploited. However, this requires an additional reverse link for the signalling channels to relay the adapting information, which may not always be cost-effective or practical to add into an existing system.
  • a method of continuously adjusting equalisation of a transmitted signal comprising the step of equalising the transmitted signal in a transmitter, wherein the equalisation is responsive to feedback provided via a duplex channel.
  • the method further comprises iteratively improving a quality measurement of said transmitted signal.
  • the method comprises the steps: • start continuous transmission of a signal; • receiving said signal; • making a measurement of the quality of said received signal; • transmitting a control signal responsive to said measurement; • receiving said control signal; • equalising the transmitted signal responsive to said control signal.
  • the steps of making a measurement, transmitting a control signal, receiving said control signal, equalising said signal, transmitting said equalised signal and receiving said equalised signal are repeated continuously.
  • the method comprises the steps: • transmitting a first signal; • receiving said first signal; • making a first measurement of the quality of said received first signal; • transmitting a first control signal responsive to said first measurement; • receiving said first control signal; • equalising a second signal responsive to said first control signal; • transmitting said second signal; • receiving said second signal; • making a second measurement of the quality of said received second signal; • transmitting a second control signal responsive to said second measurement; • receiving said second control signal; and • equalising a third signal responsive to said second control signal.
  • said first second and third signals are data signals.
  • Preferably said first, second and third signals are contiguous in time.
  • steps of transmitting a control signal further comprise the step of calculating and transmitting decision feedback perimeters.
  • the steps of transmitting a control signal further comprise the step of applying error correction to the control signal and the steps of receiving a control signal further comprise the step of decoding said error correction.
  • a communication apparatus comprising: one or more transmitters that provide means for transmitting one or more signals into one or more duplex channels; • one or more receivers that provides means for receiving said one or more transmitted signals, the one or more receivers comprising a measurement means for measuring the quality of said one or more received signal; • one or more means for generating feedback in response to the measured quality of the said one or more received signal; • one or more feedback duplex channel for carrying said feedback from one or more means for generating feedback to one or more transmitters; wherein said one or more transmitter comprises an adjustable equaliser means for equalising said one or more signals transmitted into said one or more duplex channels.
  • the feedback means further comprises a decision feedback means for calculating and transmitting decision feedback parameters.
  • the feedback means further comprises an error correction means for applying error correction to the control signal and the feedback receiver means further comprises a decoder means for decoding said error correction.
  • aspects of the present invention describe a method and apparatus for self-adapting communications whereby equalisation within the transmitter source is continuously adapted using the reverse duplex channel of a two-way communications system.
  • This transmitter adaptation is based on measurement of the received signal quality made at the destination receiver and continuous decision feedback employed between, without interruption of the normally transmitted signal. To achieve this adapting information is continuously fed-back from elements within the receiver to elements within the transmitting source by multiplexing the adapting information along with the normally transmitted data on the reverse link. It does this without increasing the traffic or data rate requirements of the system.
  • the adapting information is suitably low bandwidth, its integrity can be protected using an appropriate error coding and modulation scheme.
  • this invention suitably exploits the two-way nature of the communications channel to provide a continuous decision feedback path.
  • FIGURE 1 shows a system block diagram of a two-way, full- duplex communications system, with separate transmit and receive paths on separate media onto which an adapting scheme is to be added;
  • FIGURE 2 shows the inclusion of a near-end adjustable transmitter source and far-end decision feedback element at the destination receiver and feedback from the receiver to the transmitter;
  • FIGURE 3 shows an alternative embodiment of the communication system of Figure 2 with the addition of a far-end adjustable transmitter source and a near-end decision feedback at the destination receiver and feedback from the receiver to the transmitter.
  • the task of equalisation is to modify the physical characteristics of a transmitted signal in order to correct, accommodate or rectify some degradation mechanism that occurs.
  • Such degradation mechanisms are normally frequency, and hence data content, dependent.
  • typical signal degradation mechanisms include the rise time, fall time, bandwidth ordi"S"tOrt'i”on" of- the- receiver- or transmitter, dispersionr reflection and bandwidth limitations within the media and any other signal impairment or interference from other signals.
  • the term degradation mechanism will be so used extensively throughout this document for any linear or non-linear, stationary or non-stationary or other non- ideal effect anywhere in the communication system.
  • the signal quality metric of system performance is generally the channel Bit Error Rate (BER) and the manifestation of the degradation mechanisms is commonly referred to as Inter-Symbol- Interference (ISI) .
  • BER Bit Error Rate
  • ISI Inter-Symbol- Interference
  • SNR channel signal to noise ration
  • FIG. 1 A typical prior-art two-way non-adapting communications system is shown in Figure 1.
  • This is a full duplex system in which data can be simultaneously transmitted and received to and from the near end 11 to the far end 12 over separate transmission media 3,8.
  • the near end to far end transmission is referred to as Channel (A) 13.
  • Channel (A) 13 transmits an input signal, in (A) 1, via the transmitter 2, through the media 3, to the receiver 4 and out in the form of out (A) 5.
  • Channel (B) 8 transmits a second input signal, in(B) 10, via the transmitter 9, through the media 8, to the receiver 7 and out in the form of out (A) 6.
  • this particular system shows no adapting or no equalisation elements.
  • Channel (A) 13 is arranged to be optimised with the simple transmitter 2 being replaced with a transmitter 15 that includes an adjustable equalisation element.
  • Transmitter 15, that includes an adjustable equalisation element will be referred to as an adaptable or an adjustable transmitter throughout.
  • Adjustable equalisation transmitters are known in the art e.g. as described in US patent No. US 6,393,062 entitled “Methods and circuits for generating a pre-emphasis waveform" .
  • the described transmitters are employed in electronic systems with cable/circuit board media or as described in Canadian Patent No. CA 2,238,449 entitled “Equalisation, pulse shaping and regeneration of optical signals" for use in optical systems with optical fibre media.
  • An output from the far-end receiver 4 is monitored and assessed by an added signal quality measurement and feedback algorithm element 19, hereafter referred as the decision feedback 19.
  • the decision feedback 19 makes decisions on the quality of the signal received.
  • Such decision feedback elements are well known in the art, such as described in US Patent No. US 2003/081668 entitled “Fast computation of decision feedback equaliser coefficients”.
  • a low bandwidth decision information signal drx(A)_l 18 is produced by the decision feedback 19 and relayed to the far end transmitter 9.
  • the signal drx(A)_l 18 is then multiplexed or combined with the in(B) signal 10 in the far end transmitter path and then this combined signal is transmitted through Channel(B), represented by the form of the signal in(B) + drx(A)_2 17.
  • One method of multiplexing the low bandwidth feedback information is to exploit the data carrying capacity of control or reserved fields that are present in all major communications systems, as described in detail below.
  • a specifically designated field could be incorporated with the standard communication system protocol.
  • the feedback signal can be made suitably impairment and error resilient by encoding using an appropriate error correcting code (ECC) scheme.
  • ECC error correcting code
  • the IEEE Ethernet 802.3 2002 standard Clause 37 for gigabit Ethernet has provision for a low bandwidth "Management Function" within the Auto- Negotiation definition.
  • the IEEE Ethernet standard has provision to use unformatted code fields /U ⁇ 10:0>/ as in section 37.2.4.3.10. These fields could be used and suitably error protected for this purpose.
  • SDH Sonet
  • the SDH standard explicitly defines a transmission management function for use in a performance monitoring function.
  • ITU-T recommendations G.783 and 1.432 offer two detailed examples of such sub- layers within the Sonet protocol.
  • the 1.432 recommendation states that the BIP-96 field inserted into the B2 field of 622kbps data can be examined using the far end block error (FEBE) , and the error count inserted into the Z3 field and sent back. These allow relaying of the error count from the far end to the near end section termination point. This error count may be used as the feedback path in the decision feedback equalisation system and the error count information further used to adjust the transmitter equaliser.
  • FEBE far end block error
  • This combined signal 17 is received back at the near end 11 where the information is de-multiplexed by the receiver 7 so as to extract the decision information drx(A)_3 16.
  • the decision feedback signal drx(A)_3 15 is then used to adjust equalisation characteristics of the near end adaptable transmitter 15.
  • the transmitter 15 is continuously adjusted until the system performance of Channel (A) 13 is optimised based on the quality decision made in the receiver 4. Hence the system continuously self-adapts Channel (A) and optimises itself by adjusting the transmitter 15 characteristics, the feedback path being provided by using continuous multiplexing of the fed-back signal onto Channel (B) .
  • a far-end adjustable transmitter 24 and near end decision feedback 20 is added to Channel (B) in a similar manner to Channel (A) .
  • An output from the near-end receiver 7 is monitored and assessed by the second decision feedback element 20.
  • the decision feedback makes decisions on the quality of the signal received on Channel (B) .
  • the information based on this decision outcome can then be used to adjust the far end adjustable transmitter 24.
  • a low frequency signal drx(B)_l 21 is relayed to the near end transmitter 15.
  • the signal drx(B)_l 21 is then multiplexed with the normally transmitted signal in (A) 1 in the near end transmitter 15.
  • the combined signal is thereafter transmitted through Channel (A) , represented by the form of the signal in (A) + drx(B)_2 22.
  • This combined signal 22 is transmitted to the far end receiver 4 the information is de-multiplexed so as to extract the decision information drx(B)_3 23.
  • the decision feedback signal drx(B)_3 23 is then used to adjust equalisation characteristics of the far end transmitter 24.
  • the transmitter 24 is adjusted until the system performance of Channel (B) 14 is optimised based on the quality decision made in the receiver 7.
  • the described system self-adapts both Channel (A) 13 and Channel (B) 14 and optimises itself by adjusting the transmitter characteristics of each respective channel.
  • the performance metric of a communication system is normally the system bit error rate (BER) or signal to noise ratio (SNR) .
  • BER system bit error rate
  • SNR signal to noise ratio
  • any other performance metrics of the system can be monitored for decision feedback purposes, such as eye height, distortion, jitter, symbol by symbol ISI degradation, deterministic jitter, distortion, interference, data-rate, bandwidth or capacity.
  • the above described method and apparatus is in relation to a two-way communications system with transmission from the near end to the far end and from the far end to the near end across Channel (A) 13 and Channel (B) 14.
  • more than two-way communications can be employed, such as three-way or any number of way communications.
  • the described method and apparatus is particularly suited for employment with optical fibre media 3, 8 however it may also be employed with many other types of transmission media 3, 8 including, but not limited to, printed circuit board, cable and over-air.
  • the described- method and apparatus is particularly suited for employment with optical transmission techniques, but may also be employed with many other types of transmission technique including, but not limited to, electrical, electro-magnetic or magnetic.
  • the described method and apparatus is suited for employment with a range of transmission signal formats including, but not limited to, analogue, digital, serial, pulse amplitude modulated (PAM encoded) , modulated, un- modulated, return to zero coding, non return to zero coding, encoded data, non encoded data, multi-level, binary, continuous or discontinuous, framed, burst or packet based or any combination of these.
  • PAM encoded pulse amplitude modulated
  • a range of transmitter equalisation schemes 15, 24 for control and correction of the signals and the correction mechanism itself in any combination may be employed including, but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, optical, magnetic, thermal, chemical or other physical techniques.
  • transmissions can be non-simultaneous as employed in half duplex communications systems.
  • the described apparatus is for a communication system where only one adjustable transmitter 15, 24 is used for each media channel 3, 8.
  • transmissions are made from more than one transmitter sharing one or more media channels.
  • receiver 4, 7 being used for each media channel 3, 8 alternative embodiments employ more than one receiver, sharing one or more media channels, to carry out the receiving process.
  • the transmitter and receiver elements can be joined or part joined within the same combined element or component of the system.
  • the transmitters 15, 24 instead of being distinct and separate elements. are arranged as a combination of separate, not necessarily distinct elements in any combination or form. Similar alternatives can also be employed in relation to the receivers 4, 7 that are also described above as distinct and separate elements.
  • the described communication system employs only the destination receiver 4, 7 to relay the adapting parameter or coefficient information to their respective adjustable source transmitter 15, 24.
  • the system could be easily adapted so that the receiver near or adjacent to an adaptable transmitter can provide similar, additional or all parameter or coefficient information for adapting its near or adjacent transmitter. i.e. information determined and relayed by receiver 4 maybe used to control the equalisation of adjustable transmitter 24 and likewise receiver 7 to transmitter 15.
  • This embodiment can be used when reciprocity in the channel is to be exploited to provide some, part or all of the equalisation information and so split the equalisation decision and control making between near and far ends.
  • the decision used to adapt parameters or coefficient information could alternatively be based on one or more receivers and relayed via one or more channels to one or more of the transmitters.
  • the signal quality or decision making element is placed within, adjacent to, or near to the adaptable transmitter 9, 15 instead of as described above where both the signal quality and decision making elements 19, 20 are within or close the receivers.
  • the described apparatus shows single transmitters 15, 24, receivers 4, 7 and media 3, 8 elements per channel 13, 14.
  • the communications system contains additional filters, transducers, amplifiers, sensors or other elements or components between the transmitter and receiver.
  • the communication system can contain separate sections of media, separated by filters, transducers, sensors, transponders, transceivers, transmitters, receivers or other elements. This results in the media being separated into one or more sections of not necessarily the same type of media.
  • the described method shows the relay of the adapting parameter or coefficient information to the source transmitters 15, 24 via continuous multiplexing with the normally transmitted signal 17, 22. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any alternative multiplexing techniques such as, but not limited to, frequency division, time division, code division or phase division multiplexing can be employed.
  • a further alternative method is for the communication system to periodically, or non-periodically, interrupt the normally transmitted signal in order to relay or insert the adapting parameters or coefficients without simultaneous multiplexing required.
  • the communications system relays the adapting parameters or coefficients by exploiting periods or other events where the normally transmitted signal is not present or not made to be not present, e.g. at additional predefined or other times such as at power on of the system or components or start up of the system or a component.
  • the described method shows that the normally transmitted signals 10, 1 are not modified in order to accommodate the adapting parameter or coefficient information 18, 21.
  • the normally transmitted signal is modified in order to accommodate the adapting parameter or coefficient information.
  • the above described communication system shows the relay of the adapting parameter or coefficient information to the source via existing or non-dedicated channels 13, 8.
  • the parameter or coefficient information is relayed by an additional or dedicated channel or channels.
  • the described feedback decision signals 18, 16, 21, 23 between receivers 4, 7 and transmitters 15, 24 are shown to be singular signals in an alternative embodiment they comprise multiple or parallel signals. Furthermore, the described feedback decision signals between receivers and transmitters 21, 33, 23 and 18, 17, 16 are essentially the same signals throughout the feedback. However, in alternative embodiments the feedback signals are altered en route, such as, but not limited to, coding, removing or compaction of the information to reduce the amount of data relayed.
  • the described apparatus employs an adjustable transmitter equalising filter elements within the transmitters 15, 24 to adjust the transmitter characteristics.
  • this function is achieved by employing other adjustable techniques that act to adjust the signal wave-shape, amplitude, time duration, zero crossing, edge speed, pulse width or other characteristic of the waveform which has the effect of providing equalisation.
  • the method employs information contained within the feedback parameters to adapt the transmitters 15, 24 and hence optimise the system.
  • other additional information is used to adapt the transmitters e.g. knowledge of the past, future and present signal stream content or any other system information made available such as temperature, time or system usage not within or not within the system drawn.
  • aspects of the present invention describes a self- adaptive communications system whereby an adaptable equalisation element within a transmitter is continuously adjusted based on decision feedback information relayed to it from a receiver.
  • the equalisation element within the transmitter continuously receives adapting information from a receiver as part of a decision feedback loop via another transmitter normally present within a two-way communications system.
  • An essential feature is that it employs the communication of low bandwidth adapting information, that is inherently less sensitive to degradation, from the signal quality measurement in the receiver back to the sending adaptable transmitter. This is done continuously by multiplexing the adapting information using onto existing return path of the two-way or duplex communications channel. Thus a passive monitoring is achieved that requires no data rate increase in order to function.
  • the described method and apparatus has several inherent advantages. In the first instance it can be employed to improve a communication system's performance by employing equalisation to counteract the signal degradation mechanisms within a channel. By enclosing a configurable equalisation element within a signal quality measuring and decision feedback loop a self-adapting equalisation scheme is realised.
  • a further advantage of this self-adapting scheme is that it can be employed to improve some desired metric of the communication system's performance, such as the BER.
  • some desired metric of the communication system's performance such as the BER.
  • the described continuously self-adapting schemes can additionally self-compensate for impairments to the transmitted signal that change over time, such as the effects of temperature and component ageing, and so keeps the system running at best performance with minimum external maintenance requirements.
  • One or more of the described embodiments exhibit the further advantages in that they do not require the normally transmitted data to be interrupted in order to train, do not to rely on channel reciprocity and do not to require an additional reverse link. Such improvements assist in making the system more cost-effective and practically increase the traffic carrying capacity of the communication system when compared to other known schemes.
  • Three essential elements of any communications system are the transmitter, used to transmit the information, a receiver, used to receive the information, and the transmission media over which the information is conveyed.
  • the described self-adapting equalisation systems can be used to correct or compensate for any or all signal impairment or degradation mechanism in the communications channel including those in the transmitter, media or receiver portions.
  • the equalisation scheme can be incorporated before the receiver's sensor electronics it allows for the signal to be kept above the noise floor avoiding unwanted corruption.
  • a transmitter knows what it is trying to send and given feedback can determine what the receiver thinks it is receiving, thus a more intelligent decision feedback schemes has been produced.
  • An adaptable transmitter equalisation scheme is also less complex than an equivalent adapting receiver's, requiring lower performance building blocks, less power and can be more easily designed for low cost and high volume manufacturing. In so doing the described apparatus can contribute to higher performance systems and/or to less expensive or complex or power demanding or sized ones to be developed and manufactured.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention se rapporte à un procédé et à un appareil servant à l'auto-adaptation de l'égalisation dans des systèmes de communication. Ce procédé et cet appareil utilisent des éléments d'égalisation adaptables placés dans un ou plusieurs émetteurs qui sont réglés en continu sur la base d'informations de rétroaction de décision relayées en provenance d'un ou plusieurs récepteurs. Ces éléments d'égalisation dans les émetteurs reçoivent en continu des informations d'adaptation en provenance des récepteurs sous la forme d'une partie d'une boucle de rétroaction de décision via d'autres émetteurs normalement présents dans un système de communication multivoie. Les informations d'adaptation sont transmises à une fréquence basse, pour être plus robustes et moins sensibles à la dégradation que les signaux de fréquence supérieure transmis dans le système.
PCT/GB2004/004048 2003-09-26 2004-09-22 Egalisation avec auto-adaptation pour systemes de communication Ceased WO2005032084A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0322599A GB0322599D0 (en) 2003-09-26 2003-09-26 Self-adapting equilisation for communication systems
GB0322599.2 2003-09-26

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005032084A1 true WO2005032084A1 (fr) 2005-04-07

Family

ID=29286915

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2004/004048 Ceased WO2005032084A1 (fr) 2003-09-26 2004-09-22 Egalisation avec auto-adaptation pour systemes de communication

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB0322599D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005032084A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015021419A1 (fr) * 2013-08-08 2015-02-12 Level 3 Communications, Llc Gestion hors bande de systèmes et dispositifs à fibre optique
CN110391833A (zh) * 2019-06-24 2019-10-29 东南大学 基于自干扰能量收集的全双工中继鲁棒波束成形设计方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4995057A (en) * 1988-11-02 1991-02-19 At&T Bell Laboratories Technique for achieving the theoretical coding gain of digital signals incorporating error correction
US5881108A (en) * 1996-02-22 1999-03-09 Globespan Technologies, Inc. Adaptive pre-equalizer for use in data communications equipment
US6243425B1 (en) * 1997-07-22 2001-06-05 Globespan Technologies, Inc. Adaptive precoding system and method for equalizing communication signal

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4995057A (en) * 1988-11-02 1991-02-19 At&T Bell Laboratories Technique for achieving the theoretical coding gain of digital signals incorporating error correction
US5881108A (en) * 1996-02-22 1999-03-09 Globespan Technologies, Inc. Adaptive pre-equalizer for use in data communications equipment
US6243425B1 (en) * 1997-07-22 2001-06-05 Globespan Technologies, Inc. Adaptive precoding system and method for equalizing communication signal

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015021419A1 (fr) * 2013-08-08 2015-02-12 Level 3 Communications, Llc Gestion hors bande de systèmes et dispositifs à fibre optique
US9380362B2 (en) 2013-08-08 2016-06-28 Level 3 Communications, Llc Out-of-band management of fiber optics systems and devices
US9647751B2 (en) 2013-08-08 2017-05-09 Level 3 Communications, Llc Out-of band management of fiber optics systems and devices
CN110391833A (zh) * 2019-06-24 2019-10-29 东南大学 基于自干扰能量收集的全双工中继鲁棒波束成形设计方法
CN110391833B (zh) * 2019-06-24 2021-09-07 东南大学 基于自干扰能量收集的全双工中继鲁棒波束成形设计方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0322599D0 (en) 2003-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3181577B2 (ja) 通信システム及び通信方法
FI108265B (fi) Menetelmä ja laitteisto adaptiivisen kanavakorjauksen opetusvaiheen toteuttamiseksi digitaalisella tietoliikenneyhteydellä
US7218681B2 (en) Method and apparatus for cross-talk mitigation through joint multiuser adaptive pre-coding
US7512191B2 (en) Method and apparatus for implementing a channel correction in a digital data link
KR101514021B1 (ko) 플라스틱 광섬유을 통한 적응 데이터 통신용 프레임 구조
EP0624033A2 (fr) Système de transmission QAM pour télévision
WO1988004116A1 (fr) Procede et appareil d'egalisation de systemes de transmission de donnees
JP2001274731A (ja) Ｔｃｍ−ｉｓｄｎクロストーク環境下におけるａｄｓｌトランシーバのための等化器訓練
CN102055530A (zh) 一种充分消除以太网系统中emi影响的方法和系统
US8229303B1 (en) Reducing pulse narrowing in the transmitter signal that drives a limiting E/O converter for optical fiber channels
US11211972B2 (en) High speed serializer-deserializer systems and methods
CA1104694A (fr) Traduction non-disponible
US9887798B2 (en) Transmission apparatus, reception apparatus and modulation method
US7161980B2 (en) Receiver for high rate digital communication system
US20130195154A1 (en) Transmitter Adaptation Loop Using Adjustable Gain and Convergence Detection
US9491011B2 (en) Methods and systems for transmitting data by modulating transmitter filter coefficients
US7409003B2 (en) Method and apparatus for implementing adaptive tomlinson-harashima precoding in a digital data link
US9166831B2 (en) Asymmetric complexity PHYs to reduce power dissipation in point-to-point communication links
CN104396166A (zh) 中继器光纤-同轴电缆单元
WO2005032084A1 (fr) Egalisation avec auto-adaptation pour systemes de communication
EP1705824A2 (fr) Interface de cable duplex integral bidirectionelle à haut debit
US7321618B2 (en) PCM upstream data transmission server
US7319719B1 (en) Parallel equalization for systems using time division multiple access
US20240163047A1 (en) Method and apparatus for communicating information via pilot signals
KR101882488B1 (ko) 동선 번들 케이블 환경에서의 집선 장치 및 이를 이용한 최적 성능의 네트워크 제공 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase