[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2000062204A1 - Gestion en ligne du cycle de vie d'un contenu en fonction des statistiques d'utilisation, des evaluations fournies par les utilisateurs et des dates d'expiration - Google Patents

Gestion en ligne du cycle de vie d'un contenu en fonction des statistiques d'utilisation, des evaluations fournies par les utilisateurs et des dates d'expiration Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000062204A1
WO2000062204A1 PCT/US2000/009767 US0009767W WO0062204A1 WO 2000062204 A1 WO2000062204 A1 WO 2000062204A1 US 0009767 W US0009767 W US 0009767W WO 0062204 A1 WO0062204 A1 WO 0062204A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
content
information
item
piece
database
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2000/009767
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Nicholas D'arbeloff
Joseph Dimare
Barbara Heath
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Conjoin Inc
Original Assignee
Conjoin Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Conjoin Inc filed Critical Conjoin Inc
Priority to AU42342/00A priority Critical patent/AU4234200A/en
Publication of WO2000062204A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000062204A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/958—Organisation or management of web site content, e.g. publishing, maintaining pages or automatic linking

Definitions

  • the invention pertains to a system for maintaining and accessing a diverse collection of information to identify and keep information that is current and useful.
  • the invention pertains to a system for maintaining currency and value for a collection of information.
  • a piece of information (a content item) is added to the collection
  • metadata is added to a database specifying the location of the information, and threshold values for usage and utility of the information.
  • the database item is accessed to access the information, the user is allowed to specify a value rating for the content item, and an access log is updated. The frequency of access of the content item and its value can thus be monitored to determine if either has fallen below the associated threshold value.
  • the system performs some action, such as warning the author of the information that it is not being used or is received low ratings, marking the item for archiving, archiving the item, or deleting the item from the system.
  • Content items may further have associated expiration dates which are given at the time that the content item is added to the collection. If a content item is approaching its expiration date, the system may notify the author or perform another action such as archiving the item.
  • the system can be used for monitoring diverse collections of information, including such items as URLs and web pages, files stored on a fileserver, whole directories and subdirectories, and nondigital data such as books.
  • Figure 1 shows a sample screen containing content and a ratings entry area
  • Figure 2 shows the content matrix
  • CLM Content Lifecycle Management
  • FIG. 1 is a screen shot illustrating how feedback is collected. Each time a user views a document (or item of content) it is registered in the usage table. When a user rates the content using the ratings engine 10 at the top of the window, it is also recorded associating the content ID with the user ID, date, and rating. Rating of content may be either optional or required for the user.
  • each content item can receive one of four classifications: (1) active or good content 20, which means that this item of content is receiving high usage and that users find it of high value; (2) needs promotion 22, which means that users value the content but usage is low (usually because users can not easily find the content); (3) needs updating 24, which means that users access the file frequently but that it is not of significant use or value; and (4) archive content 26, which is the default action for content that is not being viewed often and is of low value.
  • the ratings and usage of content in combination with its expiration date serve as an effective indicator for archiving content.
  • the inventive system for maintaining currency of the information dovetails well with systems for targeting information to particular users or groups of users.
  • the methods described herein may be used with the methods described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/129,106, filed April 13, 1999, and U.S. Patent Application "Group Targeted Content Personalization,” (attorney docket 2001774- 0001), filed on even date herewith.
  • Content Lifecycle Management is based on a set of database tables that are part of an overall intranet database.
  • the following data are cataloged in the database tables: •
  • Content information - may include ID, name, file name, content type, publish and expiration dates, author/publisher, approval and archive status, and ratings/usage thresholds for each content item
  • Ratings - may include content ID, user ID, date, rating, and module in which the content was rated
  • Usage - may include content ID, user ID, date, and module in which the content was viewed
  • Author/Publisher Info - may include e-mail address for notification by e- mail
  • the following data are stored on durable media such as a hard disk: • Content, which may include documents, files, data, executables, and catalogue entries or other references to nondigital content.
  • Content is published to the intranet using the publishing functionality within the system.
  • the file may be uploaded and stored on the server and all file-specific and publisher-entered information as well as the association between the file and the database entry is saved in the database tables.
  • Data specific content such as web links (URLs) are stored in the database and the information is associated with the database entry.
  • the user-entered information may include items such as the classification of the document using the topic and subtopic parameters, access classification (who has access to view the document), target classification (who would most benefit from this content), expiration date and the rating and usage thresholds for the content.
  • access classification who has access to view the document
  • target classification who would most benefit from this content
  • expiration date and the rating and usage thresholds for the content.
  • the Archiving Daemon comprises executable code which is run as a scheduled task on a periodic basis (set by the administrator). In one preferred embodiment, it is set to run on a nightly basis.
  • the archiving daemon sends an alert e-mail to notify the author that the content is aging and will be retired at the end of the week unless it is updated.
  • Low-Usage & Low-Rating Daemons These daemons are used to notify the author if content the author has published falls below the rating and usage thresholds set when the content was published. Like the Archiving Daemon, they may be set to run on a periodic basis (e.g. , nightly). These Daemons may further directly archive content which falls below one of the thresholds (e.g., if the author/publisher does not respond to an invitation to improve the content).
  • the Content Lifecycle Management Daemon compares the averaged ratings and the usage values of each record in the content management database against the administration-set values for both the rating and usage.
  • the administration set values are the index values and allow the matrix to be configured to a particular group of users. If the rating and usage values fall above the index values for both ratings and usage, no notification is sent. If either the usage or the ratings values fall below their respective index value, a notification is sent.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

La gestion du cycle de vie d'un contenu est un procédé permettant de maintenir un contenu à jour et dans un état répondant aux besoins des utilisateurs dans un réseau intranet (ou Internet). Ce procédé consiste à archiver les contenus de valeur inférieure, inutilisés, inactifs et obsolètes du site, en fonction d'une combinaison comprenant un seuil d'évaluation, un seuil d'utilisation et une date d'expiration. L'archivage d'un contenu supprime l'accès général à ce contenu mais le garde à disposition dans le site pour des recherches spécifique concernant cette archive. Dans la gestion du cycle de vie d'un contenu, ces valeurs seuils servent de processus automatisé de retour d'information et de notification à l'éditeur et/ou à l'auteur d'un contenu vieillissant ou rencontrant peu de succès.
PCT/US2000/009767 1999-04-14 2000-04-13 Gestion en ligne du cycle de vie d'un contenu en fonction des statistiques d'utilisation, des evaluations fournies par les utilisateurs et des dates d'expiration Ceased WO2000062204A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU42342/00A AU4234200A (en) 1999-04-14 2000-04-13 Online content lifecycle management based on usage statistics, user-supplied value ratings and expiration dates

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12910499P 1999-04-14 1999-04-14
US60/129,104 1999-04-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000062204A1 true WO2000062204A1 (fr) 2000-10-19

Family

ID=22438472

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/009767 Ceased WO2000062204A1 (fr) 1999-04-14 2000-04-13 Gestion en ligne du cycle de vie d'un contenu en fonction des statistiques d'utilisation, des evaluations fournies par les utilisateurs et des dates d'expiration

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU4234200A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000062204A1 (fr)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004012126A3 (fr) * 2002-07-29 2004-03-18 Opinionlab Inc Acces sensiblement en temps reel a des donnees collectees concernant une interaction d'utilisateur avec une page web d'un site web
US6785717B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2004-08-31 Opinionlab, Inc. Method of incorporating user reaction measurement software into particular web pages of a website
US6928392B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2005-08-09 Opinionlab, Inc. Collecting a user response to an explicit question specifically concerning a particular web page of a website
US7085820B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2006-08-01 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website
EP1249767A3 (fr) * 2001-04-12 2007-05-23 General Electric Company Système et méthode d'actualisation d'un portail Internet
US7370285B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2008-05-06 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US7478121B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2009-01-13 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US7809602B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2010-10-05 Opinionlab, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for measuring and reporting business intelligence based on comments collected from web page users using software associated with accessed web pages
US7827487B1 (en) 2003-06-16 2010-11-02 Opinionlab, Inc. Soliciting user feedback regarding one or more web pages of a website without obscuring visual content
US7865455B2 (en) 2008-03-13 2011-01-04 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for providing intelligent support
US8041805B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2011-10-18 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website
US8332232B2 (en) 2009-11-05 2012-12-11 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for mobile interaction
US8775237B2 (en) 2006-08-02 2014-07-08 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for measuring and reporting user reactions to advertisements on a web page
US20220327573A1 (en) * 2010-06-02 2022-10-13 Integral Ad Science, Inc. Methods, systems, and media for reviewing content traffic

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0515073A2 (fr) * 1991-05-21 1992-11-25 Hewlett-Packard Company Migration dynamique de logiciel
GB2327787A (en) * 1997-06-02 1999-02-03 Knowledge Horizons Pty Ltd Data classification and retrieval system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0515073A2 (fr) * 1991-05-21 1992-11-25 Hewlett-Packard Company Migration dynamique de logiciel
GB2327787A (en) * 1997-06-02 1999-02-03 Knowledge Horizons Pty Ltd Data classification and retrieval system

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7970887B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2011-06-28 Opinionlab, Inc. Measuring a page-specific subjective user reaction concerning each of multiple web pages of a website
US6785717B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2004-08-31 Opinionlab, Inc. Method of incorporating user reaction measurement software into particular web pages of a website
US6928392B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2005-08-09 Opinionlab, Inc. Collecting a user response to an explicit question specifically concerning a particular web page of a website
US7085820B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2006-08-01 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website
US8041805B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2011-10-18 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website
EP1249767A3 (fr) * 2001-04-12 2007-05-23 General Electric Company Système et méthode d'actualisation d'un portail Internet
WO2004012126A3 (fr) * 2002-07-29 2004-03-18 Opinionlab Inc Acces sensiblement en temps reel a des donnees collectees concernant une interaction d'utilisateur avec une page web d'un site web
US8037128B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2011-10-11 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US8024668B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2011-09-20 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US7478121B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2009-01-13 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US7370285B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2008-05-06 Opinionlab, Inc. Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US8082295B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2011-12-20 Opinionlab, Inc. Reporting to a website owner one or more appearances of a specified word in one or more page-specific open-ended comments concerning one or more particular web pages of a website
US7827487B1 (en) 2003-06-16 2010-11-02 Opinionlab, Inc. Soliciting user feedback regarding one or more web pages of a website without obscuring visual content
US8775237B2 (en) 2006-08-02 2014-07-08 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for measuring and reporting user reactions to advertisements on a web page
US7809602B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2010-10-05 Opinionlab, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for measuring and reporting business intelligence based on comments collected from web page users using software associated with accessed web pages
US8538790B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2013-09-17 Opinionlab, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for measuring and reporting business intelligence based on comments collected from web page users using software associated with accessed web pages
US7865455B2 (en) 2008-03-13 2011-01-04 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for providing intelligent support
US8332232B2 (en) 2009-11-05 2012-12-11 Opinionlab, Inc. System and method for mobile interaction
US20220327573A1 (en) * 2010-06-02 2022-10-13 Integral Ad Science, Inc. Methods, systems, and media for reviewing content traffic

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4234200A (en) 2000-11-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6638314B1 (en) Method of web crawling utilizing crawl numbers
US7752314B2 (en) Automated tagging of syndication data feeds
Bharat et al. A comparison of techniques to find mirrored hosts on the WWW
US5898836A (en) Change-detection tool indicating degree and location of change of internet documents by comparison of cyclic-redundancy-check(CRC) signatures
EP1622053B1 (fr) Indentification de locutions dans un système de recherche d'informations
WO2000062204A1 (fr) Gestion en ligne du cycle de vie d'un contenu en fonction des statistiques d'utilisation, des evaluations fournies par les utilisateurs et des dates d'expiration
EP1622055B1 (fr) Indexage à base de phrases dans un système de recherche d'informations
EP1622054B1 (fr) Recherche à base de phrases dans un système de recherche d'informations
US8973128B2 (en) Search result presentation
US8812478B1 (en) Distributed crawling of hyperlinked documents
EP2024879B1 (fr) Alertes de modifications significatives lors de recherche
US8255519B2 (en) Network bookmarking based on network traffic
Wilde et al. Criminal choice, nonmonetary sanctions, and marginal deterrence: a normative analysis
US20070061297A1 (en) Ranking blog documents
US20110087644A1 (en) Enterprise node rank engine
US7792827B2 (en) Temporal link analysis of linked entities
US8001462B1 (en) Updating search engine document index based on calculated age of changed portions in a document
Lin Detection of cloaked web spam by using tag-based methods
Doran et al. A classification framework for web robots
EP2823408A1 (fr) Gestion de données au niveau de l'entreprise
JP2005539334A (ja) 事前選択されたデータに関し探索可能な情報コンテンツ
US6711569B1 (en) Method for automatic selection of databases for searching
Oguz et al. URL decay at year 20: A research note
JP2003316774A (ja) 文書管理システム、文書蓄積方法及びこの方法を実行するプログラム
US8239382B2 (en) Method and apparatus for creating an index of network data for a set of messages

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP