WO1998030759A1 - Interference preventing device for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator - Google Patents
Interference preventing device for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998030759A1 WO1998030759A1 PCT/JP1998/000014 JP9800014W WO9830759A1 WO 1998030759 A1 WO1998030759 A1 WO 1998030759A1 JP 9800014 W JP9800014 W JP 9800014W WO 9830759 A1 WO9830759 A1 WO 9830759A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- boom
- arm
- control
- prevention device
- interference prevention
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F3/00—Dredgers; Soil-shifting machines
- E02F3/04—Dredgers; Soil-shifting machines mechanically-driven
- E02F3/28—Dredgers; Soil-shifting machines mechanically-driven with digging tools mounted on a dipper- or bucket-arm, i.e. there is either one arm or a pair of arms, e.g. dippers, buckets
- E02F3/36—Component parts
- E02F3/42—Drives for dippers, buckets, dipper-arms or bucket-arms
- E02F3/43—Control of dipper or bucket position; Control of sequence of drive operations
- E02F3/435—Control of dipper or bucket position; Control of sequence of drive operations for dipper-arms, backhoes or the like
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F9/00—Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
- E02F9/20—Drives; Control devices
- E02F9/2025—Particular purposes of control systems not otherwise provided for
- E02F9/2033—Limiting the movement of frames or implements, e.g. to avoid collision between implements and the cabin
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F9/00—Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
- E02F9/20—Drives; Control devices
- E02F9/22—Hydraulic or pneumatic drives
- E02F9/2278—Hydraulic circuits
- E02F9/2285—Pilot-operated systems
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F9/00—Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
- E02F9/20—Drives; Control devices
- E02F9/22—Hydraulic or pneumatic drives
- E02F9/2278—Hydraulic circuits
- E02F9/2292—Systems with two or more pumps
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F9/00—Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
- E02F9/20—Drives; Control devices
- E02F9/22—Hydraulic or pneumatic drives
- E02F9/2278—Hydraulic circuits
- E02F9/2296—Systems with a variable displacement pump
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom type excavator, and more particularly to an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom type excavator that restricts movement of a work front when a predetermined portion of the work front approaches a vehicle body.
- the work front of the excavator is made up of front members such as a boom and an arm that can move up and down, and a work implement such as a bucket is attached to the tip of the arm.
- the work front boom is bent at an angle, and usually consists of one mono boom, but some are divided into two booms, a first boom and a second boom. It is called a two-piece boom hydraulic excavator.
- each front member is regulated to stop.
- operations such as excavation and earth removal that move the work front toward you (toward the operator's cab) are continuously smooth. Work efficiency is greatly impaired.
- An object of the present invention is to provide an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom type hydraulic shovel, which can continuously and smoothly perform a work of moving a work front in a forward direction and improve workability.
- the present invention provides a vehicle main body, a work front provided on the vehicle main body and comprising a plurality of front members including first and second booms and arms movable vertically.
- a flow control valve for the first boom that controls the flow rate of the supplied hydraulic oil, and a flow control valve for the second boom that controls the flow rate of the hydraulic oil that is supplied to the second boom cylinder according to the operation signal of the operating means of the second boom A two-piece boom hydraulic excavator equipped with a flow control valve and a flow control valve for an arm that controls the flow rate of hydraulic oil supplied to the arm cylinder in response to an operation signal from the arm operating means Flow A two-piece boom type hydraulic shovel interference prevention device that regulates the movement of the work front when a predetermined part of the vehicle approaches the vehicle body; a posture detecting means for detecting a posture of the work front; Control means for inputting a signal and outputting a command signal to the second boom flow control valve to move the second boom in the dumping direction when the predetermined portion of the work front approaches the vehicle body.
- the second boom when the predetermined part of the work front approaches the vehicle body, the second boom is moved in the dumping direction, so that the work front does not stop and the interference with the vehicle body and the cab does not occur.
- the work that moves the work front toward you (toward the cab) can be performed continuously and smoothly.
- the control means controls the second boom while continuing to raise the first boom. Is controlled to move in the dump direction.
- the combination of the first boom raising and the second boom dump allows the predetermined part of the work front to move around the vehicle body (driver cab), Work while avoiding interference between the front and the vehicle body
- the work of moving the front in the forward direction (toward the cab) can be performed continuously and smoothly.
- the control means inputs an operation signal of the operation means of the first boom in a first boom raising direction, and a predetermined portion of the work font is a vehicle body. , The raising operation of the first boom is decelerated, and then the operation signal in the raising direction of the first boom is corrected so as to continue the decelerated first boom raising operation.
- the raising operation of the first boom is decelerated when a predetermined part of the work front approaches the vehicle body, so that even if the maximum capacity of the hydraulic pump is limited, the second boom cylinder has a sufficient flow of hydraulic oil. Can be quickly dumped, and the interference between the work front and the vehicle body can be reliably prevented.
- the first boom raising operation is decelerated, the amount of approach of a predetermined portion of the work front to the vehicle body is suppressed, and the second boom dump can reliably prevent the work front from interfering with the vehicle body.
- the control means includes an operation signal of the operation means of the second boom in the second boom cloud direction and an operation signal of the operation means of the arm in the worm cloud direction.
- the operation signal in the cloud direction of the second boom is decelerated so that the predetermined portion of the work front decelerates as the vehicle approaches the vehicle body and then stops. And the operation signal in the cloud direction of the arm is corrected.
- control means inputs an operation signal in an arm cloud direction of the operation means of the arm, and when the first boom is moved in the raising direction, As the predetermined portion of the work front approaches the vehicle body, the arm cloud operation is decelerated, and then the operation signal of the arm in the cloud direction is corrected so as to continue the decelerated arm cloud operation.
- the arm cloud will continue to move at a certain speed after deceleration when the predetermined part of the work front approaches the vehicle body by raising the first boom and operating the cloud, and the arm cloud will be used for restoration control by the second boom dump. Stop ⁇ Repetition of deceleration is avoided, and smooth interference avoidance control becomes possible.
- control means calculates a target speed in a dumping direction of the second boom according to a moving speed of a predetermined portion of the work front, and Performs the above-mentioned control so as to move at this target speed.
- a second boom dump speed suitable for the moving speed of the predetermined portion of the work front can be obtained, and smooth interference prevention control can be performed.
- control means calculates a target speed of the second boom in the damping direction so as to increase as a moving speed of a predetermined portion of the work front increases.
- the control means is provided in the second boom in which the predetermined portion of the work front becomes larger as approaching the vehicle body.
- the target speed in the dump direction is calculated, and the control is performed so that the second boom moves at the target speed.
- the second boom damping speed increases as the predetermined portion of the working member approaches the vehicle body, and the interference between the work front and the vehicle body can be reliably prevented.
- the posture detecting means calculates a distance from a predetermined portion of the work front to a region set in advance around the vehicle body.
- the control means corrects the operation signal of each operation means so as to decelerate as the distance decreases, and
- the distance reaches a second control start distance smaller than the preset first control start distance, the operation of each operation means is performed so that at least the raising operation of the first boom is excluded and each contact member stops.
- the signal is corrected, and when the calculated distance becomes equal to or less than the second control start distance, the second boom is controlled to move in the dumping direction.
- each contact member is decelerated within the first control start distance, and each front member is stopped except for at least the raising operation of the first boom. Since the second boom is controlled to move in the damping direction within the second control start distance, sufficient hydraulic oil is supplied to the second boom cylinder even if the maximum capacity of the hydraulic pump is limited. As a result, the second boom can be quickly dumped, and the interference between the work front and the vehicle body can be reliably prevented.
- each front member is decelerated before the second boom is controlled to be moved in the dumping direction, the amount of entry of a predetermined portion of the work front beyond the second control start distance is suppressed, and the work front and the vehicle are controlled. Interference with the main body can be reliably prevented.
- control means raises the first boom when the calculated distance becomes a second control start distance smaller than the first control start distance set in advance. Except for the operation and the cloud operation of the arm, the operation signal of each operation means is corrected so that each front member stops.
- the arm cloud continues to move at a certain speed when the predetermined position of the work front approaches the vehicle body by the first boom raising and arm cloud operation and becomes less than the second control start distance,
- the arm cloud stops and repeated deceleration is avoided, enabling smooth interference avoidance control.
- control means inputs an operation signal of each operation means, and performs each operation such that the degree of deceleration decreases as the operation amount of the operation means increases. Correct the operation signal of the means.
- the deceleration control is always started from the vicinity of the first control start distance regardless of the operation amount of each operation means, and smooth deceleration control can be performed.
- the control means moves both the second boom and the arm in the dump direction when a predetermined portion of the work front approaches the vehicle body.
- a command signal is output to the second boom flow control valve and the arm flow control valve.
- control means may move an arm in a dumping direction instead of the second boom when a predetermined portion of the work front approaches the vehicle body.
- a command signal may be output to the flow control valve for the arm.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a collision prevention control method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 3 shows the dimensions, angles and coordinate system of the work front.
- FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram showing a control algorithm of the controller.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a method of calculating the distance deviation ⁇ Z from the arm tip position to the boundary of the restoration area.
- FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing details of the deceleration control.
- FIG. 7 is an enlarged view showing a setting relationship between the deviation ⁇ Z and the deceleration gain in the control gain block.
- Figure 8 shows how the setting relationship between the deviation ⁇ and the deceleration gain changes with the pilot pressure.
- FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram showing details of the restoration control.
- FIG. 10 is an enlarged view showing the setting relationship between the deviation ⁇ Z and the restoration gain in the control gain block and the setting relationship between the target speed of the second cylinder and the feedback gain in the feedback gain block. is there.
- FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining the concept when obtaining the arm tip target speed.
- FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom hydraulic excavator according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 13 is a functional block diagram showing details of the restoration control.
- FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom hydraulic excavator according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 15 is a functional block diagram showing a control algorithm of the controller.
- FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an interference prevention device for a two-piece boom hydraulic excavator according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 17 is a functional block diagram showing details of the deceleration control.
- FIG. 18 is a functional block diagram showing details of the restoration control. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
- a two-piece boom hydraulic excavator 40 has a vehicle body 41 and an articulated work front 42, and the vehicle body 41 has a lower traveling body 41A, It consists of an upper revolving unit 4 1 B mounted on the traveling unit 4 1 A so as to be able to turn, and a cab 4 1 C provided on the upper revolving unit 4 1 B.
- the hydraulic drive circuit of the excavator 40 is shown on the lower side of FIG.
- the hydraulic drive circuit includes the first boom cylinder 1A, the second boom cylinder 2A, the arm cylinder 3A, and the hydraulic pumps 29, 30 having the variable capacity mechanisms 29A, 29B.
- the first boom flow control valve 10 and the second boom flow control valve 1 that control the flow of hydraulic oil supplied from the hydraulic pump 29 to the first and second boom cylinders 1 A and 2 A 1, a flow control valve 12 for the arm that controls the flow rate of the hydraulic oil supplied from the hydraulic pump 30 to the arm cylinder 3A, and a pilot pressure operation signal to the first boom flow control valve 10.
- pilot valves 23 and 24 for outputting pilot pressure operation signals are provided.
- the pilot valves 19 and 20 are selectively operated according to the operating direction of the same operating lever, and output a pilot pressure according to the operation amount of the operating lever as a command signal.
- the pilot valves 21 and 22 and the pilot valves 23 and 24 are also selectively operated according to the operating direction of the same operating lever, and the pilot pressure corresponding to the operating amount of the operating lever is output as a command signal. I do.
- the flow control valves 10, 11, and 12 are controlled by the pilot pressure from the pilot port valve to have an opening area corresponding to the operation amount (pilot pressure) of each operating lever, Control flow rate and supply direction.
- FIG. 1 shows only the parts related to the first cylinder 1A, the second cylinder 2A, and the cylinder 3A as the hydraulic drive circuit, and includes the bucket cylinder 4A and the swing and travel actuators. Parts related to the evening are omitted.
- the interference prevention device of the present invention is provided in the two-piece boom hydraulic excavator as described above.
- the anti-interference device is provided at a connection between the upper revolving unit 41B and the first boom 1 and includes a first boom angle sensor 5 for detecting a relative angle between the upper revolving unit 41B and the first boom 1.
- a second boom angle sensor 6 that is provided at a connection between the first boom 1 and the second boom 2 and detects a relative angle between the first boom 1 and the second boom 2; Provided at the connection with arm 3, relative angle between second boom 2 and arm 3 Angle sensor 7 for detecting the pressure, pressure sensors 25 and 26 for detecting the pilot pressure output from pilot valves 19 and 20, respectively, and pressure sensor for detecting the pilot pressure output from pilot valve 21 27, a pressure sensor 28 for detecting the pilot pressure output from the pilot valve 23, a proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 13, 14 for reducing the pilot pressure output from the pilot valves 19, 20, respectively.
- the proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 18 for reducing the pressure and the pilot pressure output from the pilot valve 22 and the higher of the pilot pressure output from the proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 17 are selected and given to the flow control valve 11.
- a shuttle valve 33, and a controller 50 consisting of input and output equipment 50 a and CPU 50 b and the memory 50 c.
- the controller 50 receives signals from the angle sensors 5, 6, 7 and the pressure sensors 25, 26, 27, 28, and generates a control signal for controlling the work front 42 based on the angle signal and the pressure signal. Output to the proportional solenoid pressure reducing valves 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18.
- 3 1 is a tank.
- K 1 is a boundary line indicating the boundary between the deceleration region R 1 and the restoration region R 2
- K 2 is a boundary line indicating the boundary between the deceleration region R 1 and the region where no control is performed, and is a deceleration start line.
- c Boundary line 2 is set at a predetermined distance rO from boundary line K1.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an outline of the interference prevention control method.
- the arm tip position is calculated based on the signals from the angle sensors 5, 6, and 7 (Step 11).
- the arm tip position is calculated as a value in the XY coordinate system with the origin at the base end of the first boom 1 shown in FIG.
- the equation is shown in equation (1).
- step 12 it is determined whether the first boom raising operation is being performed (step 12). In the case of ⁇ S, it is determined whether the arm tip position exceeds the boundary line ⁇ 2 and enters the deceleration region R1 (step 13). Also in the case of NO, it is determined whether or not the arm tip position has exceeded the boundary line K2 and has entered the deceleration region R1 (step 17). If the arm tip does not exceed the boundary line K2 and has not entered the deceleration area R1, return to the start without performing any control (step 19).
- step 15 it is determined whether the arm tip position has entered the restoration area R2 beyond the boundary line K1 (step 15). If the arm tip has not crossed the restoration area R2 beyond the boundary line K1, return to the start (step 19).
- controller 50 The above processing is performed by the controller 50.
- the control algorithm of the controller 50 will be described with reference to FIGS.
- the overall control algorithm of the controller 50 will be described with reference to FIG.
- the signals from the angle sensors 5, 6, and 7 are input in block B9, and the arm tip position is calculated from the angles 01, ⁇ 2, and 3.
- a deviation Z of the shortest distance from the arm tip position to the boundary line K 1 is calculated from the arm tip position (X, Y).
- Figure 5 shows the details of this calculation.
- the signals of the pressure sensors 25, 26, 27, 28 are further input, and the pilot pressures P fbu, P fbd, P sbc, Pac and the deviation ⁇ Z are used to perform a deceleration control algorithm.
- the command voltage of the solenoid proportional valve 17 is calculated from the arm tip position (X, Y) and the deviation ⁇ Z calculated in block B9 by the control algorithm of the restoration control.
- Block B 13 outputs a 0 signal when the deviation ⁇ is positive, and outputs a 1 signal when it is negative.
- a signal from the pressure sensor 25 is input, and when the pilot pressure P fbu for raising the first boom is input, a 1 signal is output, and when it is not input, a 0 signal is output.
- the block B 15 selects the MIN of the output signals of the blocks B 13 and B 14, and the selected signal is used by the block B 16 to control the voltage of the solenoid proportional valve 17 from the block B 12 for restoration control. And the output signals of blocks B1 3 and B1 4 are both 1 Only when the signal is a signal, the restoration control of the block B12 is performed.
- control of the first boom raising electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 13 will be described.
- the deceleration gain Kfbu is calculated from the deviation ⁇ 1
- the cylinder target speed Mfbu is calculated from the first boom raising pilot pressure P fbu.
- block 1 17 multiplies the deceleration gain Kfbu by the cylinder target speed Mfbu. From this value, the target pilot pressure P fbun is calculated from the metering table 102 and converted to the output voltage of the electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 13 for the first boom raising using the voltage table 103 and output. I do.
- Fig. 7 (a) The relationship between the setting of the deviation ⁇ ⁇ in the control gain block 101 and the deceleration gain Kfbu is shown enlarged in Fig. 7 (a).
- the deceleration gain Kfbu is 1, and when the deviation ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ is less than the deceleration start distance r O, the deceleration gain Kfbu becomes smaller as the deviation ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ becomes smaller.
- the deceleration gain Kf becomes a certain value larger than 0, and when the deviation ⁇ Z becomes a negative value, the deceleration gain Kf bu is adjusted so that the value when the deviation ⁇ Z is 0 is maintained.
- the relationship between ⁇ Z and the deceleration gain Kfbu is set. As a result, the deceleration gain Kfbu in the restoration area R2 becomes larger than 0, and the first boom 1 can be operated in the restoration area R2.
- the setting relationship between the first boom raising pipe pressure P fbu and the cylinder target speed Mfbu at the first boom raising metering characteristic block 100 is the opening area characteristic of the flow control valve 10 in the first boom raising direction.
- the deceleration gain Kfbu multiplied by the cylinder target speed Mfbu in block 117 increases the first boom raising pilot pressure P fbu as shown in Fig. 8 (a).
- the speed is corrected to the deceleration gain Kfbu * so as to increase according to the above, and deceleration control according to the operation speed of raising the first boom is enabled.
- the characteristic of the metering table 102 is the reverse characteristic of the first boom raising metering characteristic of the block 100.
- the 2nd boom cloud electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 16 L For the 1st boom lowering electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 14, the 2nd boom cloud electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 16, L, control gain block 105, 1st boom lowering metering characteristic block 104, multiplication block 1 18
- the metering table 106 the voltage table 107, and the control gain block 109, the second boom cloud metering characteristic block 108, the multiplication block 119, the metering table 110, and the voltage table 111, It is controlled in the same manner as the first boom raising electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 16.
- the relationship between the deviation ⁇ and the deceleration gain is such that the deceleration gains Kfbd and Ksbc become 0 when the deviation ⁇ is 0 or less, as shown in the enlarged view of Fig. 7 (b). Is set, whereby the first boom lowering and the second boom cloud stop on the boundary line K1.
- the deceleration gain Kfbd multiplied by the cylinder target speed Mfbd in the block 118 becomes smaller as the first boom lowering pilot pressure Pfbd increases, as shown in FIG. 8 (b). *, And the deceleration control according to the operation speed of the lowering of the first boom becomes possible as in the case of Fig. 8 (a).
- the control gain block 113 calculates the deceleration gain Kac from the deviation ⁇ , and the first boom raising pilot pressure gain block 1 16 calculates the gain Kfbu from the first boom raising pilot pressure Pfbu.
- the cylinder target speed Mac is calculated from the arm cloud pilot pressure Pac.
- control gain block 1 13 Setting of control gain block 1 13 is almost the same as control gain block 105.o
- the setting relationship between the first boom raising pilot pressure Pfbu and the gain Kfbu in the first boom raising pilot pressure gain block 116 is enlarged in FIG. 7 (c).
- the gain Kfbu is 0 when the first boom raising pilot pressure Pfbu is the highest, the gain Kfbu increases as the pilot pressure Pfbu decreases, and the gain Kfbu becomes 1 when the pilot pressure Pfbu decreases near 0.
- the relationship between the pilot pressure Pfbu and the gain Kfbu is set in FIG.
- the three gains obtained in blocks 1 12, 1 13, 1 16 are blocks 120-1 At 23, processing is performed by multiplying by the following equation to obtain the corrected deceleration gain Kac *.
- Kac * (1 -Kfbu + Kacx Kfbu) xMac... (2)
- the target pilot pressure Pacn is calculated from the metering table 114 from the corrected deceleration gain Kac *, converted into the output voltage of the arm cloud electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 18 by the voltage table 115, and output. .
- FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram showing details of the restoration control of the block B12.
- the control gain block 200 calculates the restoration gain Ksbdd from the deviation ⁇ . In addition, using the coordinate values (X, Y) of the arm tip position calculated in block B9 of FIG. 4, the front angular velocities of the first boom 1, the second boom 2, and the arm 3 are determined in the block 204.
- the second boom target angular velocity 0 ′ 2 ⁇ is obtained in block 207
- the second boom cylinder target velocity S 2n is obtained in block 208 using the second boom target angular velocity 0 ′ 2 ⁇ .
- in-bACK gain block 209 than the second blanking one arm cylinder objectives speed S 2n Fi obtaining an-back gain Ksbf.
- the restoration gain Ksbdd and the feedback gain Ksbf obtained as described above are added in an adding unit 203, and a target pilot pressure Psbdn is calculated from the metering table 201 from the gain Ksbd. Converted to the output voltage of the proportional pressure reducing valve 17 and output via the multiplication unit (see Fig. 4) of block 16 0
- An example of the setting relationship between the deviation ⁇ Z and the restoration gain Ksbdd in the control gain block 200 is enlarged in FIG. 10 (a).
- the restoration gain Ksbdd When the deviation ⁇ is a positive value, the restoration gain Ksbdd is 0, and when the deviation ⁇ becomes a negative value (when the tip of the arm enters the restoration region R2), the restoration gain Ksbdd decreases as the deviation ⁇ decreases.
- the relationship between the deviation ⁇ and the restoration gain K sbdd is set so that the restoration gain Ksbdd becomes 1 when the force increases and the deviation ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ falls below a certain negative value.
- the arm tip speed is calculated by the following equation.
- ⁇ 3 L 3 ( ⁇ ! + ⁇ 2+ ⁇ 3) cos ( ⁇ , + ⁇ 2+ ⁇ 3)
- the second boom target angular velocity 0'2 ⁇ is determined by (7).
- FIG. 10 (b) An example of the setting relationship between the second brake cylinder target speed S 2n and the feedback gain Ksbf in the feedback gain block 209 is shown enlarged in FIG. 10 (b).
- the gain Ksbf is 1 for example, the gain Ksbf urchin by which the smaller second blanking one arm cylinder target speed S 2 according to the second boom cylinder target speed S 2n decreases
- the relationship between n and the feedback gain K sbf is set.
- the characteristics of the metering table 201 are the inverse characteristics of the second boom dump pilot pressure Psbd and the cylinder target speed Msbd determined according to the opening area characteristics of the flow control valve 11 in the second boom dump direction. . However, the cylinder target speed Msbd on the horizontal axis is converted to gain.
- the control gain block 200 calculates the restoration gain Ksbdd according to the amount of entry, and the feedback gain block 209 provides feedback according to the arm tip speed at that time.
- the gain is calculated, the second boom 2 is dumped at a speed corresponding to the amount of penetration into the restoration area R2 and the arm tip speed, and the arm tip is moved back into the deceleration area R1.
- the pilot valve 19 in the upward direction of the first boom flow control valve 10 is not operated, and other pilot valves, for example, the pilot valve 21 in the cloud direction of the second boom flow control valve 11 or for the arm
- the pilot valve 23 in the cloud direction of the flow control valve 12 is operated, 108, 108, 119, 110, 111, or 112, 113, 123, 114 of FIG. 1
- the electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 16 or 18 is operated so that the arm tip stops at boundary line 1.
- the deceleration gain of the block 105 or 113 is corrected so as to increase as the pilot pressure increases, as described in Fig. 8 (b).
- deceleration control is started, and smooth deceleration control is always possible.
- the pilot pressure Pfbu for raising the first boom is not contained in the block B 14 shown in FIG. 4, and the block B 14 outputs the 0 signal, so that the tip of the arm is restored by the inertia of the work front 42. Even if the area slightly enters the area R2, the restoration control of the block 12 is not performed.
- the pilot valve 19 in the upward direction of the first boom flow control valve 10 is operated and the pilot valve 23 in the cloud direction of the arm flow control valve 12 is not operated, 100, 101 in Fig. 6
- the pilot pressure is reduced by operating the electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 13 and the first pressure is reduced.
- deceleration control is performed so that the first boom raise is reduced to the speed determined by the deceleration gain of the block 101, and the arm tip speed is reduced.
- block B 14 shown in FIG. 4 contains the pilot pressure Pibu raised by the first boom, and block B 14 outputs one signal. Therefore, when the arm tip position crosses the boundary line K1 and enters the restoration area R2, the output of the block 13 also becomes one signal, and the arm tip position is moved from the boundary line K1 to the deceleration area R1 side. Block 12 restoration control is performed.
- the restoration gain is calculated according to the amount of intrusion into the restoration region R2, and the functions 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, and 209 are performed according to the arm tip speed at that time.
- the feedback gain is calculated, and based on these gains, the second boom 2 is automatically dumped according to the amount of intrusion into the restoration area R2 and the arm tip speed at that time, and the arm tip position is moved into the deceleration area R1. Move it back.
- the arm tip position exceeds the boundary line K2 and enters the deceleration region R1
- the arm decelerates so that the first boom is lowered to the specified speed, and the arm tip position moves to the boundary line.
- the arm tip moves around the vehicle body, especially the cab, due to the combination of the decelerated first boom raising and the second boom dump by the recovery control. In other words, it is possible to continuously and smoothly avoid interference with the vehicle body, especially the driver's cab without stopping the work front, thereby improving workability.
- the pilot valve 19 in the upward direction of the first boom flow control valve 10 is operated, and the pilot valve 23 in the cloud direction of the arm flow control valve 12 is also operated.
- the deceleration control and the restoration control described in (b) above are performed, and the functions described in FIG. 8 (c) are performed by the functions of 116, 120, 122, and 122 in FIG.
- the deceleration gain Kac 'of the arm cloud is corrected to increase as the first boom raising pilot pressure P fbu increases, the amount of deceleration is reduced, and a certain amount of arm corresponding to the first boom raising speed is adjusted. Penetrate the recovery area R2 at cloud speed.
- the deceleration control is performed so that the arm cloud also stops at the boundary line K1
- the arm tip enters the restoration area R2 and is returned to the deceleration area R1 by the second boom dump.
- the deceleration control of the arm cloud is restarted, so the stop and deceleration of the arm cloud are repeated, and the movement of the work front becomes jerky.
- the arm cloud since the arm cloud enters the restoration area R2 at a certain arm cloud speed corresponding to the speed at which the first boom is raised, the arm cloud continues deceleration control, and smooth interference avoidance control becomes possible.
- the arm tip position enters the restoration area R2 beyond the boundary line K1
- the arm tip is moved back by the second boom dump, and the work front stops. This prevents interference with the driver's cab without causing any trouble in moving the work front in the forward direction (toward the driver's cab).
- the speed of the second boom dump adapted to the arm tip speed can be obtained, and smooth interference avoidance control can be performed.
- the restoration gain is calculated according to the amount of penetration of the arm tip into the restoration area R2, the closer the tip of the arm is to the cab, the greater the second boom dump speed, and the greater the distance between the work front and the vehicle body. Interference can be reliably prevented.
- the deceleration gain is corrected by multiplying the cylinder target speed obtained by the metering characteristic block, the deceleration according to the predetermined characteristics when the deviation ⁇ becomes less than the deceleration start distance r 0 regardless of the level of the operating pilot pressure. Control is started and smooth deceleration control is always possible.
- the arm tip position enters the restoration area R2 as described above, the arm tip is moved back by the second boom dump so that the work front does not stop and interferes with the cab. Has been prevented.
- the movement of returning the arm tip can also be obtained by moving the arm in the dump direction as described later.
- the arm is a front member used to execute the work itself during normal work (for example, during excavation work), and the operator is operating the operation lever to move the arm in the cloud direction. If the arm is moved in the dumping direction by the control described above, the movement may be contrary to the operator's will, and the operator may feel uncomfortable.
- the second boom of a two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator is often used as a so-called positioning boom that selects the working range in the front-rear direction before starting work, and the frequency used during actual work is often Since the second boom moves in the dumping direction with the above control, the operator does not feel a sense of discomfort because the number is small. Therefore, according to the present embodiment, the interference avoidance control is smoothly performed without impairing the operation feeling of the operator. I can.
- FIGS. 1 and 9 A second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In the first embodiment, only the second boom is dumped by the restoration control. However, in the present embodiment, the second boom and the arm are dumped. In the figure, the same reference numerals are given to members or functions equivalent to those shown in FIGS. 1 and 9.
- the interference prevention device includes, in addition to the components of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1, a proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 15 for reducing the pilot pressure from the pilot hydraulic pressure source 32, and a pilot And a shuttle valve 34 that selects the higher one of the pilot pressure output from the pilot valve 24 and the pilot pressure output from the proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 15 and supplies the selected pilot pressure to the flow control valve 12.
- the overall control algorithm of the controller 50A is the same as that of the first embodiment shown in FIG.
- the details of this control algorithm are the same as those of the first embodiment except for the restoration control of block B12.
- the arm target angular velocity 0' 2 ⁇ is obtained, and the arm cylinder target velocity S 2nA is obtained in block 208 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ using the arm target angular velocity 0 ' 2 ⁇ , and further, the feedback gain block 209 A Calculate the feedback gain Kaf from the arm-boom cylinder target speed S 2nA .
- the control gain block 210 calculates a restoration gain Kacd for the arm dump from the deviation ⁇ . Further, similarly to the case of the restoration gain Ksbdd for the second boom dump described in the first embodiment, the restoration gain Kacd obtained by the control gain block 210 is assigned to each of 204, 205, 206, 207 A, 208 A, and 209 A. The feedback gain Kaf obtained by the function is added by the adder 213, and The target pilot pressure Pacn is calculated from the metering table 211, converted to the output voltage of the arm dump electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 15 by the voltage table 211, and multiplied by the block 16 (see Fig. 4). ) And output.
- Control gain block 2 1 0 Set relationship arm boom cylinder target speed S 2 n A and feedback gain Kaf in set relationships and the feedback gain block 2 0 9 A deviation ⁇ Z and restore the gain Kadd in the FIG. 1 0 (a) This is substantially the same as the setting relationship shown in (b).
- the characteristics of the metering table 211 are the inverse characteristics of the arm dump pilot pressure Psbd and the cylinder target speed Msbd determined according to the opening area characteristics of the flow control valve 12 in the arm dump direction. However, also in this case, the cylinder target speed on the horizontal axis is converted to a gain.
- the control gain blocks 200 and 210 calculate the restoration gains Ksbdd and Kadd according to the amount of entry, and the feedback gain block 209 calculates the restoration gains Ksbdd and Kadd.
- the feedback gain according to the arm tip speed at that time is calculated, the second boom 2 and the arm 3 are dumped at a speed according to the amount of intrusion into the restoration area R2 and the arm tip speed, and the arm tip is decelerated in the deceleration area R Move it back to 1.
- the interference prevention device differs from the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that the pilot valves 19 to 24 as operating means are replaced by electric lever devices 19 A to 24.
- the pilot control system of the flow control valves 10, 11, 12 has electric lever devices 19 A to 24 A based on the pilot pressure from the pilot hydraulic source 32.
- Electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valves 13, 14, 16, 55, 18, and 56 that generate pilot pressure in accordance with the operation amount are provided.
- the pilot pressure from pilot hydraulic source 32 A proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 17 for reducing the pressure is provided, and the higher of the pilot pressure output from the pilot valve 55 and the pilot pressure output from the proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 17 is selected by the shuttle valve 33 to control the flow rate.
- Valve 1 is given to 1.
- the controller 50B inputs signals from the electric lever devices 19A to 24A and the angle sensors 5, 6, and 7, and generates control signals for controlling the work front 42 based on these operation signals and angle signals.
- FIG. 15 shows the overall control algorithm of the controller 50B.
- Controller 50 B calculates and outputs a command voltage to proportional solenoid valve reducing valves 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18 similar to that shown in FIG. , 56 for calculating and outputting the command voltage to the controller.
- the input of the operation signal of the part C1 is replaced by the operation signal (electric signal) Dfbu, Dfbd, Dsbc, Dac from the electric lever device from the operation pilot pressure.
- the deceleration control block B 11 and the restoration control block B 12 are the same as those shown in FIGS. 6 and 9 except that the main ring characteristic corresponds to the operation signal from the electric lever device. Is the same.
- the operation signals Dsbd and Dad from the electric lever devices 22A and 24A are converted into a metering characteristic block (eg, 100 in FIG. 6) and a metering table (eg, 102 in FIG. 6). Then, it is converted to the command voltage according to the voltage table (for example, 103 in FIG. 6) and output to the proportional solenoid valves 55 and 56.
- a metering characteristic block eg, 100 in FIG. 6
- a metering table eg, 102 in FIG. 6
- FIGS. 1 A fourth embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.
- the arm is dumped instead of the second boom.
- the same reference numerals are given to members or functions equivalent to those shown in FIGS. 1, 6, 6, 9, 12, and 13.
- the interference prevention device includes a proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 17 and a shuttle valve according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 with respect to the dump direction of the second boom flow control valve 11.
- the proportional electromagnetic pressure reducing valve 15 and the shuttle valve 34 similar to the second embodiment shown in FIG. are provided.
- the overall control algorithm of the controller 50C is the same as that of the first embodiment shown in FIG.
- the control of the second boom cloud proportional solenoid pressure reducing valve 13 and the control of the arm cloud proportional solenoid valve 18 are also shown in the functional block diagram of the deceleration control.
- the control is reversed from that shown in FIG. That is, for the electromagnetic proportional pressure reducing valve 18 for the arm cloud, the control gain block 113, the arm cluster metering characteristic block 112, the multiplication block 123, the metering table 114, and the voltage table 111 5 is controlled.
- control gain block 109 the second boom cloud metering characteristic block 108, the multiplication block 1 19, the metering table 110,
- the 1st boom raising pilot pressure gain block 1 16 and the blocks 1 20 to 123 that combine the gains obtained in the blocks 1 09 and 1 16 are provided.
- the vehicle crosses the boundary line K1 (see Fig. 11), it can enter at a certain speed of the second boom cloud according to the speed at which the first boom is raised, thereby preventing interference with the arm dump control.
- FIG. 18 The details of the restoration control of block B12 (see Fig. 4) of the controller 50C are shown in Fig. 18 as a functional block diagram.
- the blocks 207, 208, 209, 200, 203, 201, and 202 for the second boom dump of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 9 are replaced with the blocks 207B, 208A, and 209 for the arm dump.
- A, 210, 211, 211, 212 are added.
- the arm target angular velocity 0 ' 2nA is obtained using the arm tip target velocity ( X'n , Y'n ).
- the functions of the other blocks 208A, 209A, 210, 211, 211, and 212 are the same as those of the second embodiment shown in FIG.
- the control gay The recovery gain Kadd is calculated in accordance with the amount of intrusion in the feedback block 210, and the feedback gain is calculated in the feedback gain block 209 in accordance with the arm tip speed at that time.
- Dump arm 3 at a speed corresponding to the amount of penetration into R 2 and the speed of the arm tip, and move the arm tip so that it returns into deceleration area R 1.
- the second boom when a predetermined portion of the work front approaches the vehicle body, the second boom is controlled to be dumped. ) Can be performed continuously and smoothly, greatly improving workability.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Operation Control Of Excavators (AREA)
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE69831713T DE69831713T2 (de) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | Kollisionsverhütungsvorrichtung für einen hydraulischen Bagger mit einem zweiteiligen Arm |
| JP53073798A JP3759961B2 (ja) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | 2ピースブーム式油圧ショベルの干渉防止装置 |
| EP98900050A EP0915208B1 (en) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | Interference preventing device for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator |
| US09/142,234 US6230090B1 (en) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | Interference prevention system for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator |
| KR1019980706941A KR100281009B1 (ko) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | 2피스부움식 유압셔블의 간섭 방지장치 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9/584 | 1997-01-07 | ||
| JP58497 | 1997-01-07 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO1998030759A1 true WO1998030759A1 (en) | 1998-07-16 |
Family
ID=11477775
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP1998/000014 Ceased WO1998030759A1 (en) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-01-06 | Interference preventing device for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6230090B1 (ja) |
| EP (1) | EP0915208B1 (ja) |
| JP (1) | JP3759961B2 (ja) |
| KR (1) | KR100281009B1 (ja) |
| CN (1) | CN1076422C (ja) |
| DE (1) | DE69831713T2 (ja) |
| WO (1) | WO1998030759A1 (ja) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1122369A4 (en) * | 1998-12-02 | 2002-06-05 | Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd | HYDRAULIC CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE |
| JP2007107311A (ja) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-04-26 | Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd | 作業機械の干渉防止装置 |
Families Citing this family (27)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4430270B2 (ja) * | 2001-08-06 | 2010-03-10 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | プラントの制御装置及び内燃機関の空燃比制御装置 |
| US6711838B2 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2004-03-30 | Caterpillar Inc | Method and apparatus for determining machine location |
| US6819993B2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2004-11-16 | Caterpillar Inc | System for estimating a linkage position |
| US7007415B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-03-07 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and system of controlling a work tool |
| CN1989302B (zh) * | 2004-08-02 | 2010-06-09 | 株式会社小松制作所 | 流体压力执行机构的控制系统及其控制方法以及流体压力机械 |
| US7178606B2 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2007-02-20 | Caterpillar Inc | Work implement side shift control and method |
| US20080038106A1 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2008-02-14 | Oshkosh Truck Corporation | Mobile lift device |
| US7489098B2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2009-02-10 | Oshkosh Corporation | System for monitoring load and angle for mobile lift device |
| JP4823767B2 (ja) * | 2006-05-31 | 2011-11-24 | 日立建機株式会社 | 双腕作業機械 |
| US7676967B2 (en) | 2007-04-30 | 2010-03-16 | Caterpillar Inc. | Machine with automated blade positioning system |
| US8135518B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2012-03-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Linkage control system with position estimator backup |
| CN101294402B (zh) * | 2008-05-28 | 2010-12-08 | 江阴市长龄液压机具厂 | 液压挖掘机用动臂保持阀 |
| US7975410B2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2011-07-12 | Caterpillar Inc. | Adaptive excavation control system having adjustable swing stops |
| KR101613560B1 (ko) | 2011-03-08 | 2016-04-19 | 스미토모 겐키 가부시키가이샤 | 쇼벨 및 쇼벨의 제어방법 |
| CL2012000933A1 (es) * | 2011-04-14 | 2014-07-25 | Harnischfeger Tech Inc | Un metodo y una pala de cable para la generacion de un trayecto ideal, comprende: un motor de oscilacion, un motor de izaje, un motor de avance, un cucharon para excavar y vaciar materiales y, posicionar la pala por medio de la operacion del motor de izaje, el motor de avance y el motor de oscilacion y; un controlador que incluye un modulo generador de un trayecto ideal. |
| US8886415B2 (en) * | 2011-06-16 | 2014-11-11 | Caterpillar Inc. | System implementing parallel lift for range of angles |
| US9580885B2 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2017-02-28 | Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Swing operating machine and method of controlling swing operating machine |
| CN102493656B (zh) * | 2011-12-26 | 2014-05-21 | 三一汽车制造有限公司 | 用于多节臂架的流量分配系统、装置和方法、工程机械设备 |
| EP3042999B1 (en) * | 2013-08-22 | 2019-06-26 | Yanmar Co., Ltd. | Industrial vehicle with collision prevention system |
| EP3283352A2 (en) * | 2015-04-17 | 2018-02-21 | Hudson Bay Holding B.V. | Safetysystem for foldable arm on mobile construction machine |
| JP6477259B2 (ja) * | 2015-05-28 | 2019-03-06 | コベルコ建機株式会社 | 建設機械 |
| JP2017057607A (ja) * | 2015-09-15 | 2017-03-23 | 日立建機株式会社 | 建設機械 |
| JP2019127725A (ja) * | 2018-01-23 | 2019-08-01 | 株式会社クボタ | 作業機、作業機の制御方法、プログラム及びその記録媒体 |
| US10801180B2 (en) * | 2018-06-11 | 2020-10-13 | Deere & Company | Work machine self protection system |
| DE102019207170A1 (de) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-19 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Verfahren zur Verhinderung einer Kollision eines Werkzeugs mit einer Baumaschine |
| DE102022119045A1 (de) * | 2022-07-28 | 2024-02-08 | Wacker Neuson Linz Gmbh | Arbeitsmaschine mit einer Begrenzungseinheit zum Festlegen eines Grenz-Parameters |
| DE102022122737A1 (de) | 2022-09-07 | 2024-03-07 | Wacker Neuson Linz Gmbh | Mobile Arbeitsmaschine mit einer einen elektrischen und/oder hydraulischen Aktuator aufweisenden Antriebseinheit |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH02221526A (ja) * | 1989-02-23 | 1990-09-04 | Komatsu Ltd | 超小旋回パワーショベルにおける作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JPH02261128A (ja) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-23 | Komatsu Ltd | 超小旋回パワーショベルにおける作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JPH02308018A (ja) * | 1989-05-23 | 1990-12-21 | Komatsu Ltd | 油圧式堀削機に於ける作業機の千渉防止装置 |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0297437U (ja) * | 1989-01-23 | 1990-08-02 | ||
| JP2739358B2 (ja) * | 1989-11-10 | 1998-04-15 | 油谷重工株式会社 | 作業機干渉回避装置 |
| JP2870599B2 (ja) | 1990-01-23 | 1999-03-17 | 油谷重工株式会社 | 建設機械の作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JP2733355B2 (ja) * | 1990-02-02 | 1998-03-30 | 油谷重工株式会社 | 建設機械の作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JP3215502B2 (ja) * | 1992-05-19 | 2001-10-09 | 株式会社小松製作所 | 作業機動作範囲制限装置 |
| JPH06104985A (ja) | 1992-09-17 | 1994-04-15 | Fujitsu Ltd | 構内交換機における個人情報表示装置 |
| US5704141A (en) * | 1992-11-09 | 1998-01-06 | Kubota Corporation | Contact prevention system for a backhoe |
| JP3357120B2 (ja) | 1993-04-30 | 2002-12-16 | 日立建機株式会社 | 作業機の干渉防止装置 |
| JPH084046A (ja) | 1994-06-16 | 1996-01-09 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | 作業機の干渉防止装置 |
| JP2972530B2 (ja) * | 1994-11-16 | 1999-11-08 | 新キャタピラー三菱株式会社 | 建設機械の作業機制御装置 |
| JP3461407B2 (ja) | 1995-06-08 | 2003-10-27 | 日立建機株式会社 | 油圧ショベルの運転室干渉防止装置 |
| US5957989A (en) * | 1996-01-22 | 1999-09-28 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Ltd. | Interference preventing system for construction machine |
| JP3156037B2 (ja) | 1996-06-14 | 2001-04-16 | 日本興産株式会社 | 建設汚泥のリサイクル方法 |
-
1998
- 1998-01-06 CN CN98800013A patent/CN1076422C/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-01-06 EP EP98900050A patent/EP0915208B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-06 US US09/142,234 patent/US6230090B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-01-06 WO PCT/JP1998/000014 patent/WO1998030759A1/ja not_active Ceased
- 1998-01-06 JP JP53073798A patent/JP3759961B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-01-06 KR KR1019980706941A patent/KR100281009B1/ko not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-01-06 DE DE69831713T patent/DE69831713T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH02221526A (ja) * | 1989-02-23 | 1990-09-04 | Komatsu Ltd | 超小旋回パワーショベルにおける作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JPH02261128A (ja) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-23 | Komatsu Ltd | 超小旋回パワーショベルにおける作業機干渉防止装置 |
| JPH02308018A (ja) * | 1989-05-23 | 1990-12-21 | Komatsu Ltd | 油圧式堀削機に於ける作業機の千渉防止装置 |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| See also references of EP0915208A4 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1122369A4 (en) * | 1998-12-02 | 2002-06-05 | Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd | HYDRAULIC CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE |
| JP2007107311A (ja) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-04-26 | Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd | 作業機械の干渉防止装置 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN1076422C (zh) | 2001-12-19 |
| CN1216079A (zh) | 1999-05-05 |
| KR100281009B1 (ko) | 2001-02-01 |
| KR20000064551A (ko) | 2000-11-06 |
| US6230090B1 (en) | 2001-05-08 |
| JP3759961B2 (ja) | 2006-03-29 |
| EP0915208A1 (en) | 1999-05-12 |
| EP0915208A4 (en) | 2000-05-31 |
| EP0915208B1 (en) | 2005-09-28 |
| DE69831713D1 (de) | 2006-02-09 |
| DE69831713T2 (de) | 2006-05-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO1998030759A1 (en) | Interference preventing device for two-piece boom type hydraulic excavator | |
| JPWO1998030759A1 (ja) | 2ピースブーム式油圧ショベルの干渉防止装置 | |
| JP3091667B2 (ja) | 建設機械の領域制限掘削制御装置 | |
| JP6707064B2 (ja) | 油圧式作業機械 | |
| JP4215944B2 (ja) | 油圧ショベルのフロント制御装置 | |
| JP2003184133A (ja) | 油圧作業機の振動抑制装置 | |
| JPH101968A (ja) | 油圧建設機械の自動軌跡制御装置 | |
| JP3198249B2 (ja) | 建設機械の干渉防止装置 | |
| JP5970625B1 (ja) | 建設機械、ハイブリッド油圧ショベル、および電動発電機の出力トルク制御方法 | |
| JP3310783B2 (ja) | 作業機の干渉防止装置 | |
| JP4741521B2 (ja) | 油圧ショベルのフロント制御装置 | |
| KR20230143178A (ko) | 작업 기계 | |
| JP2015148928A (ja) | 建設機械 | |
| JP3468331B2 (ja) | 建設機械の干渉防止装置 | |
| JP3713358B2 (ja) | 建設機械のフロント制御装置 | |
| JP3466371B2 (ja) | 建設機械の干渉防止装置 | |
| US12264451B2 (en) | Hydraulic excavator | |
| JP2017155418A (ja) | 作業機械および作業機械の干渉回避方法 | |
| JP6152178B1 (ja) | 作業機械および作業機械の干渉回避方法 | |
| JP3682352B2 (ja) | 建設機械のフロント制御装置 | |
| JP2000355957A (ja) | 油圧ショベルの領域制限掘削制御装置 | |
| JP2000336690A (ja) | 建設機械の領域制限掘削制御装置 | |
| US12286768B2 (en) | Work machine | |
| JP3418127B2 (ja) | 作業用機械の干渉回避制御装置 | |
| JPH111937A (ja) | 建設機械のフロントアタッチメントの角度制御装置 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 98800013.X Country of ref document: CN |
|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CN JP KR US |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1998900050 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09142234 Country of ref document: US |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1019980706941 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1998900050 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1019980706941 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1019980706941 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1998900050 Country of ref document: EP |